Sacramento City Council Meeting - June 10, 2025 - Budget Adoption and Children's Fund Awards
I'm sorry.
Call this meeting to order.
Please call the roll.
Thank you.
Councilmember Kaplan.
Here.
Councilmember Dickinson.
Here.
Vice Mayor Talamantes.
Here.
Councilmember Plekibom.
Councilmember Maple.
Here.
Mayor Pro Tem Guerra.
Here.
Thank you.
Councilmember Jennings.
Here.
Councilmember Vang.
Here.
And Mayor McCarty.
Here.
You have a full quorum.
Okay.
First.
Landed government and pledge.
Who is in charge?
Mr. Tannett.
Okay.
Can we have Councilmember Maple do the land acknowledgement and pledge?
Please rise if you are able.
Please rise for the opening acknowledgments in honor of Sacramento's indigenous people and tribal lands.
To the original people of this land.
The Nisenan people.
The southern Maidu.
Valley and Plains Miwok.
Putwanyan two peoples.
And the people of the Wiltson Rancheria.
Sacramento's only federally recognized tribe.
May we acknowledge and honor the native people who came before us and still walk beside us today on these ancestral lands.
By choosing to gather today in the active practice of appreciation of acknowledgement and appreciation for Sacramento's indigenous peoples history, contributions, and lives.
I remain standing.
Salute.
And pledge.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
And to the republic for which it stands.
One nation under God.
Indivisible.
With liberty and justice for all.
And all of the things that we have to do to make sure to be.
Thank you.
So Mayor we have two special presentations.
The first is pride month.
Presented by council member Kaplan and council member Maple.
All right.
Thank you.
I will kick it off.
Recognizing June as pride month.
And it is an honor to co-present this with my colleague council member Maple.
Um, the month of June has been designated as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer plus month.
Also known as LGBTQ month plus in commemoration of the Stonewall rebellion which occurred during the weekend of June 27th through 29th in 1969 in New York City.
Which truly gave birth to the modern LGBTQ civil rights movement.
Since 1994 June has been designated and celebrated.
And we celebrate the notable achievements of millions who make up our LGBTQ plus community.
Along with their valuable contributions to the nation's cities and states.
And, um, today, acknowledging this, honoring our LGBTQ community members is even more important than ever.
As they are being under attack.
As they are being under attack.
And other eyes.
And disvalued.
Which constantly puts in danger.
Because I know from my time of being a school board member.
The highest percentage of students that commit suicide are those that identify and belong to the LGBTQ community.
We are putting in jeopardy.
The lives of so many children.
Who wonder if they belong.
When we as adults fail to recognize the identity of those who identify in our LGBTQ community.
They belong.
They are one of us.
They are the same.
They deserve equal rights no matter what.
And so this month.
It is important that we acknowledge Pride Month.
We acknowledge that there are rising hate crimes.
There are rising division amongst legislation to discriminate against our LGBTQ community.
And put in division amongst our community.
So I would like to thank those who are in attendance with us this evening.
Including our cities.
LGBTQIA.
Employee Resource Group.
And the Greater Sacramento LGBTQ Center.
The Stonewall Foundation of Greater Sacramento.
Stonewall Democrats of Greater Sacramento.
And others who have expressed their support.
Whether they are here.
Because we are starting a little later.
Or not.
I see you.
I hear you.
I support you.
I will fight beside you along the way.
I will stand in front and protect you.
So at this time.
I would like to turn it over to my colleague.
Council Member Maple.
To make a couple of remarks as well.
Thank you.
Council Member Kaplan.
For kicking us off.
And just thank you also to the mayor.
And all my colleagues.
I know.
That we are co-presenting this.
But we also know that this is from all of you.
And that was shown by the flag raising outside of our city hall.
Anyone can go out there and witness.
And see where we stand as an organization.
As a city.
But I think it's really important.
That we also do this resolution.
Because we know that this is an especially difficult time.
For our LGBTQIA plus community.
We know that when we look at the news.
We know that when we look at statistics.
Of what happens to our young people.
As was mentioned.
That it's more important than ever.
That we stand up and acknowledge.
What's happening.
And that we also honor and show those.
That are a part of this community.
That we care.
And that we see you.
And so I'm.
We've taken significant strides in Sacramento.
To ensure that rights and well-being.
Of transgender individuals.
Are taken seriously in our city.
So much so that we were the first city.
To become a transgender sanctuary city.
In the United States of America.
And so I think that's a huge.
A huge deal for us.
We also proudly fly the progress flag out front.
So and with all of this.
I want to encourage the broader community.
To make sure that we're.
Doing everything that we can.
To hold those safe in our communities.
And that means showing up.
That means standing up.
When you hear something.
And when you see others doing.
When you see others doing things to others.
That we must stand up for them.
But I think one of the most important things.
That we have as a city.
Beyond the things that I just mentioned.
Is that we have an incredible.
Employee resource group.
Otherwise known as an ERG.
That is made up of our LGBTQ staff.
And I think what that says.
It's not just about us up here.
And what we say.
It's not just about a flag that's outside.
It's not just about a resolution.
It's about all of our employees coming together.
And supporting one another.
I think that that is one of the greatest things.
That we can do to help show support.
And so with that.
I would love to invite up.
Kelly McAllister and Jennifer Dolan Wyatt.
To say a few words about why.
This is important to you.
In the city of Sacramento.
Thank you.
Thank you so much.
Mayor and council.
I have a tremendous amount of gratitude.
As a member of the LGBTQIA plus community.
But also as a city employee.
Of nine years.
These nine years.
I have felt the utmost affirmation.
And celebration from the city.
As an employer.
And also as a constituent.
I would be remiss though.
If I didn't acknowledge.
The progress pride flag that we see today.
And all that it represents.
It includes the original rainbow colors.
Of the pride flag.
And it also includes the colors.
Of our trans non-binary communities.
As well as the black and brown communities.
And our communities of color.
All marginalized people.
Currently under attack.
By the federal government.
The progress pride flag.
Exists for many reasons.
It's an acknowledgement of pride.
Diversity.
And inclusion.
But it's also displayed.
So that those who feel unseen.
Undervalued.
Unheard.
Or afraid of who.
And what they represent.
Know.
That we recognize them.
And they are seen and celebrated.
So if you are out there now.
And you see this flag.
You drive by.
And you see it displayed outside.
And you see any part of yourself.
Represented in this.
I want you to know.
That the world.
This country.
And the city.
Is a better place.
Because you exist in it.
Let us not forget.
That no one is free.
Until we are all free.
.
I'm good.
I'm really good.
Are you sure?
I am good.
Thank you.
Well back.
Back over to you.
Councilmember Kaplan.
Yeah.
So.
I'd like to have.
I'm good.
Jennifer Kelly.
Come on up front.
Anybody else.
Part of our.
LGBTQ.
ERG community.
Councilmember Mae.
May I join.
I join them.
I join them.
And I join them.
And I join them.
To the community.
So.
Councilmember Maple want to come join me.
If I have to get in there, Ryan.
Okay, here and then, oh, sorry, I'm on right.
I know I'm on right.
And then let me grab one on here.
Sorry, I'm doing them for everyone.
Thank you all.
I think your phone was set to video.
That's okay, can you just send me the picture?
I'll send you the photo.
I was.
Kelly has a good time.
Okay.
Oh, excuse me.
I'm so sorry.
And Councilmember Kaplan, you have our second special presentation, Gun Violence Awareness
Month.
Thank you.
Not my intent to do two in a row, but we didn't have a council meeting last week.
And I think it's just as important that we acknowledge June as being Gun Violence Awareness Month.
There is too much violence among our community and among our youth.
And we have to recognize that gun violence is real.
And it's a time that we honor lives lost to gun violence, uplift voices of survivors, and recommit to our efforts to prevent future tragedies through education, policy, community investment, and advocacy.
Every year we know that more than 47 Americans die from gun related injuries.
Of those, 3,200 being from the state of California.
And that's not including others impacted by non-fatal shootings and the lasting trauma that follows from everyone who's been impacted.
In our city, we experience between 70 and 100 firearm deaths, injuries on an annual basis, with approximately 40 being related to homicides, 24 being related to suicides, and others related to accidental deaths.
We also know firearms are the leading cause of death for children and teens.
And by early February, more Americans are killed with guns than are killed in our peer countries in an entire calendar year.
I want to thank Deborah Grimes, Moms Demand Action, and the Nagy Grimes 212 Anchor Foundation, Academic for Athletes,
and Barry Axios Co-Founder of the Voice for the Youth Foundation, and their panel discussion and free watch party of Put the Guns Down film this past Friday, which was also held on Gun Violence Awareness Day.
As we talk about budget and funding and the hard decisions we have to make, I'm a big believer in why wait for someone else to help others?
What can I do opposed to what I cannot?
Back in December 2024, I started convening a violence discussion roundtable.
We don't have a lot of money in the city of Sacramento, but gun violence waits for no one.
And to say we have to wait until we have funding is to dismiss where we can begin collaborating and working together as a community.
And that's just part of what each one of us in this room can do to know that we all play a part in bringing gun violence to an end and educating the community.
Right. Yes.
We have a lot of work to do and more work to do to come in our community.
So I'm proud to support this resolution.
I am proud that we have so many of our community partners that are here tonight to say that we can do more and we can bring an end to gun violence and especially our youth and address our youth and the violence that it brings.
So good things come when we work together.
And I really want to thank Deborah Grimes, you know, who is the chapter lead for Mom Demand Action.
And many of you know I have known Deborah for almost 20 years because I knew her son from my time being a school board member to his time being a coach at Intercom during football to unfortunately to his murder a couple of years ago.
It impacts everyone.
And so Deborah, thank you for making this tragedy a mission to do something about it and not remain silent.
I'd love for you to say if you can a couple words if you want to take a seat and use the smaller microphone down there.
You are more than welcome to.
Right here.
You want to take a seat?
We've also got a handheld one for you Deborah.
Oh, thank you.
Well, thank you so very, very much.
Mayor McCarty and this wonderful council city council.
So what I'd like to say is that as Councilmember Kaplan said, you know, we did lose our son.
He was taken.
And on the 4th of July, next month, we will be at the cemetery and we will be with our son for his third year angelversary.
In the last three years, what we have learned is that we have become shoulders that people can lean on.
But we've also learned that we are standing on the shoulders of so many people who do so many awesome, wonderful things in this community, such as the Daryl Roberts of the world and so many other organizations.
We are very fortunate.
We are blessed to have council members such as the champions, Lisa Kaplan and Katie Maple and Rick Jennings.
And there are certainly others as well as our mayor, but champions who do more than just talk the game.
They are really serious about ending gun violence.
And we are just so fortunate as a people to have them.
And I just want to thank you so, so much for making this an awareness day or awareness month.
Pardon me, it's gun violence awareness month all over the nation.
And this is something that we need to recognize.
And I'm just so grateful that we in Sacramento are now recognizing it.
Thank you so very, very much.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Go ahead.
Thank you.
Councilwoman from District one.
First, Councilman Kaplan.
Thank you so much for bringing this resolution to the council to recognize gun violence, particularly this month.
And Deborah, just thank you for all the great work that you do.
And I didn't want to say this was timely because, you know, last week there was a girl that was shot in Medivue.
The week before that, there was a 15 year old boy that was shot and killed at Coral Gables, Villa Hardeen in Medivue.
Two weeks before that, there was a young adult that was shot and killed in Valley High.
Right.
And, you know, gun violence, no, no boundaries, no district.
And these incidents aren't isolated.
Right.
And they really demand a deeper attention from, from our, from city, from county in terms of the work that we need to do.
And so I just want to say thank you, Councilman Kaplan for bringing this to our attention.
And that we just not only pass a resolution, but that we also make sure that we back that up with dollars in our budget.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I, I had the opportunity to be at the showing of the documentary on Friday, the 6th at the Guild Theater.
Uh, and it was a packed house.
Uh, not only did we see the documentary, but we were also had the opportunity to have a panel of, uh, parents and brothers and sisters and loved ones and cousins and aunts, whoever was there that had also lost someone to gun violence.
And to hear their experiences, to listen to them, talk and to hear the pain sometimes in some cases, many years later, that pain is one said, never leaves.
It is always there.
You just have to learn how to control it and go out and talk to others about how they can make sure that they don't suffer the same, um, situation.
So I just wanted to acknowledge you and all the mothers that demand action because you have a plan in place.
And I told you that it would be my job and my, my, my privilege to work with you to find out where we can take this documentary and put it in our schools, put it in where our parents can see it.
And we can start using this movie as a way, this documentary as a way of motivating the change that we all want to see.
And so I'm willing to commit my time to help with that plan to put in place, to do all with the great work of all the mothers that are demanding action in order to see if we can make that film help us here in this great region of Sacramento.
So, thank you.
I want to thank, uh, council member Kaplan for, uh, bringing this resolution to the, to the council tomorrow, to mark this month.
Uh, there is no question gun violence is a, a scourge in our communities and across the state and the, and the nation and youth violence in particular, uh, is a horrific, uh, aspect of, uh, what our youth, uh, and families face, uh, uh, in some neighborhoods, uh, on an all too frequent basis.
But nobody, nobody is, is immune.
Uh, the son of someone who worked for me when I was a county supervisor was a victim, a fatal victim of, of gun violence.
Uh, someone who council member Kaplan and I know extremely well, who's council member Kaplan served, served with lost, lost her son to, to gun, to gun violence.
Uh, this is something that touches us all in some way, uh, or, or another.
I'm, uh, I'm heartened, uh, by what we do here, at least in the city of Sacramento and in the state of California, in addressing, uh, gun violence, uh, and, uh, moms demand action.
The Brady campaign deserve enormous credit for the grassroots advocacy they, they bring to illustrate a piece of legislation that, that, and the mayor will remember this, that, that I introduced that would have taxed ammunition to provide money for, uh,
youth mental health.
I couldn't, I couldn't get it across the finish line, but last year that legislation, thanks to mom, mom's demand action and others was signed into law.
So, you know, there are things we can do.
There are things we are doing, but we realize, and I think recognize that it is the investment in our young people, in our community, in our neighborhoods, providing positive alternatives, giving, giving children and families, uh, a safe environment by, by creating those, uh, those, uh, those, uh,
those, uh, those options that are, that's really the, the answer.
And so that's where, uh, we need to be focused as, uh, in what we do, what we say, and what we, what we believe in.
Thanks.
So, uh, if you want to say a couple comments, otherwise I'm, I'm biting you down.
I'm biting you down.
After you're done.
So, uh, I just want to thank, because I didn't, um, I know that impact all in together, gang awareness prevention, I am SAC, impact SAC, self, uh, awareness recovery,
Mack Road partnership are in the audience, um, because y'all working together and amongst more, um, after the mayor makes his comments, I want to invite him and you all down to the dais, uh, to the, to the bowl, so we can take a picture.
Mayor.
Yeah, thank you.
And, um, you know, this is always an important topic and never more important than the night that we adopt our budget.
So maybe some of your stick around and, uh, the values are important, not just to adopt a resolution, but what are we doing as a city to prevent this?
And I will say that our budget that we're adopting continues, uh, funding for our youth programs.
And then through our measure L, um, implementation will be quadruple or more investments in our young people.
And I'll just want to note that, you know, as a young council member, I'll always vividly remember those first calls I got from our police chief or captain telling me that a 15 year old lost their life in our city through senseless gun violence.
And, and we've worked on laws or legislation to combat legal gun trafficking in our communities, but we need so much more.
And a lot of it is for our, our youth.
I know that I have kids in high school myself, so I see it.
And, and I will note just a positive note that, that Mr. Dickinson's right.
You know, 10 years ago, you had the courage to, to introduce a law that, that places a surcharge on, on gun and ammunition purchases.
And last year, some member Gabriel authored and I the same bill, and it was signed by the governor and the city of Sacramento is currently applying to get even more money for, for successful, uh, gun violence intervention programs.
And so, you know, we believe in this work, so we don't have to hear the stories and those calls that we get from our police officials.
So, uh, thank you for, uh, the work that the community does in that.
And yes, let's come down and take a picture.
Thank you.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Thank you.
It's not taking the charge.
Okay.
Thanks.
Thank you.
It's not taking the charge.
Okay.
Thanks.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Yes.
Yeah.
Yeah.
All right.
Scoot in, fellas.
Yeah.
Yes.
Yeah.
Yeah.
All right.
Scoot in, fellas.
Yeah.
Yes.
Come on, Barry.
Slide in.
Okay, it's all right.
Right.
All right.
We got a couple more coming.
Can we have some of you come to the other side?
Yes, thank you.
All right, everybody right here on 3, 1,
2, 3.
1, 2, 3.
We're good.
Thank you.
Mayor, before Barry Axios walks out the room,
I just want to acknowledge him for doing a great job of emceeing the panel this past Friday.
He did an incredible job, a very tough job because there was a lot of emotion.
Fortunately, he came prepared.
So anyway, great job, Barry.
Thank you, Barry.
Thank you, Barry.
Thank you, Barry.
Thank you, Barry.
Thank you, Barry.
Thank you, Barry.
Thank you, Barry.
Thank you, Barry.
So, Mayor, we now move to the consent calendar.
That's agenda items 1 through 15.
Do we have any council members that wish to pull an item or comment?
Yes.
I see no other people punched up.
So, Council Member Maple, item 14.
All right, I'll be brief.
I know we've had a big day and more to come, but I really felt as though I needed to say something about this.
So, this is approving an application for a grant that would go to the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, which I, you know, very proudly serve as the vice chair of.
And this would go towards providing the water and the planting skills needed in order to plant trees along Franklin Boulevard.
This is a huge deal because that part of Franklin Boulevard, they live very close by.
It is a heat island.
There are a lot of people there who are, you know, low income.
They rely on our public transit system.
They walk, they bike, and it's very, very hot in the summer and very difficult for them to get around.
So, luckily, thanks to our Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets project that's currently under construction there, we are putting in the necessary pedestrian and cyclist safety that we need for that street.
But that means that we also need to put the trees in because people need the shade.
It's a part, it's just a big part of life.
We need to be cool in the summer.
It's only going to get hotter with climate change.
And so, just really want to appreciate our staff for being forward thinking and especially right now while things are tough in terms of getting federal money and just thinking outside the box.
So, thank you and thank you for your work.
Okay.
I have seven speakers on the consent calendar.
The first is Howard Nuxon and he's speaking on matters not on the agenda from the 2 p.m.
So, Howard?
Unfortunately, we had a little bit of celebrating so our meeting got to turn quickly.
Thank you, Council.
Good afternoon.
My name is Howard Knutson.
I'm a certified public accountant and former IRS agent of 10 years.
I currently operate a small tax accounting practice in District 1 in Natomas.
I'm speaking before you today because I'm concerned about the travel expenditures being incurred by the Chief of Police.
The Sacramento Bee has published an article today by Joe Rubin which goes through in detail just issues with reimbursements being made by the city to the Chief of Police for first-class plane travel, including three first-class plane travel trips conducted in May 2004 for two consecutive weeks.
We need our city, our Chief of Police here in the city not traveling 37 calendar days a year on taxpayer expense.
The Sacramento Bee goes into detail about the reimbursement she submitted, how she did not submit receipts, just screenshots of alleged purchases.
Our city is funding first-class plane travel with taxpayer money.
This is unacceptable.
We need real internal controls by CPAs reviewing this so that we can prevent taxpayer money being used for personal travel expenses.
Thank you for your time.
Have a nice day.
I waited over five hours to speak.
Yes, two minutes.
So thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Our next speaker is Zion Taddis, then Lambert, then Marbella Sala.
Zion is speaking on item 11.
Thank you.
Okay, so on item 11, I was just going to talk about, you know, before Sacramento become a farm-to-fork city, Queen Sheba was a farm-to-fork.
I know you're trying to do some urban farming around that area, so I'm just interested.
I just wanted to make sure that I am included when it comes to, because I'm trying to grow my food so I can serve it at my restaurant.
So I just want to be able to get involved in that grant.
That's what I wanted to say on 11.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Lambert is speaking on item 13, then Marbella Sala on 9.
Number 13 is called suspension of competitive bidding.
That's another word for bid rigging and bid peddling.
As a person who owns a business, I've never been part of a bid process that was suspended.
It even says in the language that you have to have experience, expertise, and capacity.
Well, even if you have the expertise and capacity, you're eliminated because of this wording.
There should be, there should never be no competitive bidding.
In the paper, in the Sacramento Bee, there was a shout out to the Sacramento Bee.
There was a scandal of how people were getting contracts and they weren't bidding on them.
That's an example. You can give it to your relatives.
In San Francisco, they showed where people were giving contracts at City Hall to relatives.
That's what that happens when you have suspended competitive bidding.
And I want to send a shout out.
This is the millennials telling me this because I don't really pay that much attention to social media.
They handle that for me.
But I want to send a shout out to Vice Mayor Telemontes because they told me today I was on the road.
They called me and said that she was saying very kind things on social media.
I haven't even seen it.
So I wanted to say thank you.
I have no idea what I'm thanking you about.
But I'm thanking you because they said whatever you did is starting to get us a lot of business.
And as the weather gets hotter, that's when the cheesecakes take off.
So thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Our next speaker is Marbella Sala.
Calling Marbella is Brandon Martinez.
And for the people at the back of the room, please, there's plenty of seats up front.
We can't block the back doors.
Good evening.
I'm here because I just want to point out how unique this SACA grant is that's coming to
part of Garden Land Northgate and District 2.
And it's a coalition of culture, the Urban League, the Mutual Network, and GNNA.
But importantly, it's also with the city.
And what it's designed to do, it's a SACA grant, is to build infrastructure, community-driven solutions
for transportation, mobility, and access, infrastructure, and emergency preparedness.
It's the first time that I know of that we're going to do such a collaboration with District
2 and our District 3 and in this unique coalition of community-based organization.
And I'm hoping that this is only the beginning and we'll be able to do this more because we
really have very similar issues.
And I want to thank Mikel Davila because he did a lot of work in helping us complete the grant process
and putting this coalition together.
So thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Brandon Martinez on items 3 and 12.
And Amber Stott on item 12.
Hey, y'all.
I came to echo that sentiment.
It's amazing what's going to happen in District 2 and 3.
And also District 4.
So I came to bring up that Plucky Bomb, this is your moment to shine.
And I'm happy for everyone here who gets to take part in what's happening in North SAC 2.
But let me not forget what's happening in D8.
So I totally want everyone to know that this is a sign of the times.
There needs to be more EVs out there.
And this is a step in the right direction.
So I definitely urge everyone to look into that.
Thanks.
Thank you for your comments.
Amber Stott on item 12.
Good evening.
Thanks for having me.
I am here in support of the SACA grant also.
And very proud to operate one of Sacramento's probably best examples of government gone right,
Floyd Farms.
And this site, it doubles as both a student farm and as a community park.
And so we're going to be using these grant funds to go into the community and conduct visioning sessions,
which essentially are needed because the original project started so long ago that many people
don't really know what happened.
The walls went up in the pandemic.
And we really want to make sure the community not only knows it's there, but gets to have a
say and a voice in some of the programming that we develop in this new beautiful space.
So we're excited to have an opportunity to partner with the city and work hand in hand to do visioning
sessions across our community and bring that feedback back to implement pilot programming to
really embrace the needs of our community.
We're in a community where we have a 40% childhood obesity rate.
Food access is an issue for many of the students that go to the adjacent school,
we had taught to Floyd Elementary. And we want to really address the mobility gaps to getting access
to that healthy food. So thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Mayor, I have no more public comment for the consent calendar.
We can entertain a motion.
I'll second.
The motion is second.
Mr. Dickinson.
Got it.
Okay. I'm sorry, Mayor. I overlooked this, but I would like to be recorded as a no vote on item six.
Not because I think this doesn't go far enough. I think it goes too far in reducing the discount for
those who have EVs and our monthly parkers. The predicate is that EVs have established themselves
and they don't need any more incentives. I don't hold that view when they're only 20% of the vehicles
on the road. So I just would prefer to be a no vote on this item.
Thank you. So you have a motion by Council Member Geta and a second by Maple.
No vote on item six for Council Member Dickinson.
Thank you. All those in favor, please say aye.
Aye.
You know, sir, abstention. Noted for Mr. Dickinson.
Measures pass. Next item.
Thank you.
We move to item 16 is a public hearing.
Public hearing on renewal of downtown Sacramento property and business improvement district number
2025-01.
Good evening, Mayor and members of City Council. I am Suzanne Tan with the Finance Department.
The item before you is the public hearing for the renewal of the downtown Sacramento PBID for another 10-year term.
Renewal of the downtown Sacramento PBID will continue to provide services and activities that
create a special benefit to assess properties within the district.
At this time, staff recommends opening the public hearing. Upon the close of the public hearing,
staff will count the ballots and come back to Council as a consent item on June 17th with the ballot tabulation results.
Thank you. Michael Alt with the downtown Sacramento partnership is here and would like to say a few words.
Welcome.
Thank you very much.
Ready for your big moment?
Yeah, no, this has been a good day to say the least.
Vice Mayor, members of Council, City Manager, Michael Alt with the downtown partnership.
It's important to note back in 1995, and I'll be really quick because I know you've got a full agenda.
This was the first business improvement district in the state of California.
There's been a lot of involvement, I think, in this movement as far as districts creating
additional income to provide enhanced services over and above baseline. But we have spent
the last couple of years meeting with our property owners, meeting with our businesses,
talking about the future. And candidly, you can't make up some of the things that we've dealt with
the last couple of years as it relates to charting a path forward. We're seeing economic development
come back. We're seeing employees come back. We're meeting with owners. We're meeting with consultants,
talking about what level of service we need to provide to our constituents and make sure that
as we start looking towards the future that we are creating a downtown environment that we're proud of.
I said in our State of Downtown Breakfast, you know, regions are defined by their downtowns and the
involvement not only of this organization but the work that we're doing, I think, makes a difference in
how the city is viewed and treated from a respect standpoint. This is a special place for us.
I want to acknowledge my staff. I'm going to make them stand up just really quick. Stand up. No, I'm torturing you.
Yeah, do that. But I also want to acknowledge specifically Danielle Biller. Danielle is my Deputy Director
She and I have been doing this for close to 30 years. She is the heart and soul of this organization
as it relates to this work. And she, when this organization renews and we feel confident, we
rule anew. We will renew. We're not taking it for granted, but she has been the champion that we have
had. And the senior team that we've got here believes in this. So we appreciate the support,
the partnership with you, Board Member Mel Stein. I think what we do makes a difference. And when this
community looks at the partners we have, there's no better partner than the city of Sacramento. So thank you
for what you do. Council Member Pluckybom, we feel very fortunate to have you on board, not only as a
board member, but as a champion and this council in general, you have made a difference in this community
and we are your partners moving forward. So thank you.
Thank you. And you do great work. So, um, one public comment. I have one speaker, Mac worthy.
And then after this, if Mr. Pluckybom would like to open and close the public hearing.
And move the item.
And move the item.
Oh, yeah. You know, I would hear when that downtown thing was created in the
end and said, let's crown downtown. How many jobs have it created downtown to money?
See, this is part of your corruption. Every time you come up here, you get these people say, oh,
we're doing this. People that you're paying these people to stay quiet and say you're doing all right.
As much corruption is here and you still spending money and can't identify where the money went. Downtown.
Downtown used to have water running down. That didn't work.
Some of the first money came here.
It's like redevelopment money was old Sacramento. Still that don't work.
Why you can't have an outside audit of where the money is going?
People, what's downtown? Nothing. I was downtown the first time. I ain't never been in an arena.
You've got a situation that I want to show the LP agent downtown. You got some real shit going on downtown and youths involved.
You just don't go. But you're not telling the people really what's going on downtown.
You have some of the worst crime having here was downtown. It's a drunk, a drunk alley is downtown.
That's all. Get drunk and go out on the street and show your ass. That's all you got downtown.
Nothing else. Nothing else to have people. That's what you call socialism.
It's there and people accept it because you are deating your way through.
Theater. Oh, I'll keep you laughing. We're going to do this. We're going to do that.
And you haven't done a damn thing downtown.
Vice mayor of no more speakers. Thank you.
Uh, council member Plucky Bob.
Open and close public comment. Move staff recommendation.
Perfect. We have a motion and a second. All in favor, please say aye.
Aye. Abstentions.
Nose. Seeing none. Congratulations downtown PBID.
Thank you. So that passes unanimously with mayor McCarty absence.
So vice mayor, we're going to reorder the agenda and take item 18 next,
which is the Sacramento Children's Fund grant awards.
All right. Wonderful. We want to get city staff to come join us down here.
And I just want to thank members of the public for being here again.
I know a lot of you came two weeks ago. Um,
and a lot of us were looking for more information on the programming and the
details of the programs that we were going to be funding.
So city staff had time to go back and do a little more homework for us to
fully understand what we were awarding.
Okay. This is going to be a very quick and short presentation.
My name is Renee Koston program manager for the Sacramento Children's Fund.
Uh, thank you for having us again, vice mayor and council.
So based off of the, uh, direction that we received,
uh, just to give a little recap scenario,
one that we presented previously funded 24 programs and projects with the 50,
50 split that was set in the strategic investment plan.
And it had an emerging set aside for grassroots scenario two funded 16 programs and projects
with the 50, 50 split with no adjustments to the funding, um, allocation.
We provided a ranked application list with description as requested by council at the previous council meeting.
We, uh, added a ranked application list by fun goal with descriptions,
a rank application list by district served with dis with descriptions.
And then we also added a social vulnerability index, the SVI at a 20% overlay as requested by city council at last city council meeting.
So this just briefly gives an overview.
That grid area is going to be what the SVI expanded upon the seed and COI overlay that was already included
in the RFP and the strategic investment plan for assessment when we were looking at applicants.
Um, the SVI does align with the seed and the child opportunity index COI and expands eligible opportunity areas.
Uh, this basically means that a hundred percent of eligible applications to the Sacramento children's fund
serve the SVI identified opportunity areas as well.
Um, so it expanded the areas, but our applications already served, um, much of what was expanded.
Just a little recap on our Sacramento children's fund timeline.
Um, we're here now June 10th for award recommendations presented to city council for approval.
Uh, we hope that our contract execution and fund disbursements happens probably closer to the end of July.
And then July, 2025 to June, 2028 will be the grant award time period for this first set of grant.
And I'm going to take a seat and let you all continue the deliberation.
Thank you so much.
Um, we do have 28, uh, speakers for public comment.
So the city clerk will start reading off names and then we'll do a council comments and delivery, deliberations.
Thank you, vice mayor.
Um, as you said, I have 28 speakers.
So I'm going to call a few of you might line up.
Um, Jamie Gersick, Gersick, Jeanette Carpenter, Darrell Roberts, Omar Turner, Brenda Yvonne,
Jamie Gersick, Amy.
Good afternoon, mayor and council members.
My name is Jamie Garrick and I'm the chief program officer at the Sacramento LGBT community center.
LGBTQ plus youth are in crisis and they urgently need your help.
They're more likely to face trauma, homelessness and mental health challenges,
yet have fewer affirming services available.
Nearly half of LGBTQ plus youth seriously considered suicide last year.
For transgender and non-binary youth, it was more than half.
The center supports LGBTQ plus youth through our drop in space, youth enrichment, housing,
employment and mental health services, all of which align with the goals of the Sacramento Children's Fund.
I know you have all been strong advocates for the LGBTQ plus community in the past and I urge your
support for scenario one funding for mental health services for LGBTQ plus youth.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Jeanette?
Good evening, vice mayor and council members.
My name is Jeanette Carpenter.
I'm here on behalf of Child Action.
We serve 17,000 children and their 9,000 families in Sacramento County.
We empower families and child care professionals with the tools and support services they need to successfully care for children.
We applaud the city for their progress with one-time investments in child care.
However, this is not a sustained funding strategy despite naming early childhood a priority.
Few Measure L proposals support kids zero to five and our initiative is one of the only child care focused proposals.
It targets the city's highest needs zip codes and proven demand and offered direct support for both families and providers.
With existing infrastructure and evidence-based models, this is a scalable high-impact investment.
Ongoing city support is essential to meet the real and growing need.
Thank you for your time.
Daryl Roberts and then Omar Turner.
Good evening, members of the council and city manager.
I'm Daryl Roberts, CEO and co-founder of Roberts Family Development Center and a resident of District 2.
I speak on behalf of our co-founder, Tina Roberts, our board of directors and the youth and their families that we serve.
We're pleased that staff ranked us as the number one scored non-profit in our category of violence prevention.
However, I am tempered by the recognition that there are many other worthy organizations who are not selected.
And I stand before you to request that not only your support for the 1.3 million dollars suggested and your staff report and championed by council member Maya Vang and others.
But I also think you should look to the 25 vacant police positions to add any money from those 25 vacant positions to the violence prevention line in the city budget.
I'm also suggesting that community meetings to better explain the grant process for the children's fund occur in District 2, 4, 5, and 6, and 8 to assure nonprofits fully understand the rubric used to score their applications.
Our organization benefited from 25 years of doing this work well.
Having a vision which has allowed us to build sustainable funding this year alone touching 5,000 youth and their families and employing more than 125 young people and mature adults.
And documenting success.
But we also had, and you get this if you remember, the public scrutiny that caused us to have to strengthen our organization fiscal department and provide the necessary documentation, including annual audits, which cost in excess of $45 each year.
For some nonprofits, that $45,000 is nearly half their existing budgets unacceptable.
We have also funded partners and supported them.
Many of them are.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Our next speaker is Omar Turner, then Brenda Yvonne.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Thank you for your comments.
Please take your seat.
Your time is complete.
Our next speaker is Omar Turner, then Brenda Yvonne.
Unfortunately, we can't do that.
Everyone needs to be treated equally.
Thank you for your comments.
Please take your seat.
Thank you so much for your comments and all that you do for our community.
We do have two minutes per person.
Thank you so much.
Our next speaker is Omar.
Good evening, Council.
I'm Ed Kassmerich, the Executive Director of Campus Life Connection.
We appreciate being considered and asking you to consider full funding.
We do work with youth.
We've talked tonight about youth violence, and we've talked about youth mental health.
That's where we focus.
I want to let Coach Omar Turner share some more.
Just sat down with a young man that came through our program, and he's right now in the process
of becoming a therapist.
He has his master's school in social work, and he's going to be one of the ones that's
going to be helping us with our program.
And we think that we're going to touch a lot of young people, their mental health, helping
them with their education, staying away from gun violence, all of those things because
of the program that we have.
And we've been doing it close to 30 years and seeing a lot of positive outcomes from it.
And we just want to, again, say thank you, and hopefully you guys will give us the maximum
amount.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Brenda Yvonne, then Christine Smith.
Hi, good evening.
Hello, Mayor and City Council members.
My name is Brenda Scioli, and I am the Youth Wellness Manager at La Familia Counseling Center,
and I'm joined by Yvonne Collin-Smith, who is our Program Manager for our Birth and Beyond
program.
On behalf of La Familia Counseling Center and Rachel Rios, we would like to extend our sincerest
gratitude for recommending us for funding for our AIM High program, which is a vital resources
for children ages 0 to 5 and their families in Sacramento.
The first five years are critical, not just for a child's development, but for the well-being
of the whole entire family.
AIM High is built on the belief that children and families deserve support every step of the
way, helping them navigate each milestone with confidence, care, and connection.
Your support strengthens our mission and reflects a meaningful investment in our youth.
We're excited to move forward together in creating a lasting impact for families across
our community.
So thank you.
Thank you so much.
Thank you for your comments.
Christine Smith, then Christy Gray, then Ashley Powers-Clark, then Mercedes Parker.
Good evening, Vice Mayor and Council Members.
Christine Smith with Sacramento County Office of Education, and I'm here tonight to thank
you for considering approval of staff's recommendation to fund Books for Brighter Futures, which will
expand the Dolly Parton Imagination Library within the city.
The Imagination Library provides books delivered directly to children's home monthly from the
time they enroll until their fifth birthday, and additionally will provide literacy workshops
for families and connections to resources through Help Me Grow.
This investment by the city is matched 100% by SCOE and will boost access to literacy across
the city.
We at SCOE, along with our partners United Way, who serve as the 501c3, appreciate your consideration
and support of our proposal.
In addition to showing our appreciation, I do want to also acknowledge that there is
a need for continued investments, as you are doing here tonight, in early learning and in
our youth by the city.
It is essential to continue the excellent work by those in this room and out in the community,
so please continue investing in our future and our youth.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Christy Gray.
Hi, Christy Gray, Deputy Program Officer of the Sacramento LGBT Community Center.
I have been there for three years, and I'm coming as an administrator supporting the team
that supports the youth, but also as a mother.
I see my team and myself see the folks that come in in desperate crisis, and this program
will not only support continued mental health services at the center, but also we will be
providing an opportunity to train future clinicians for mental health.
So I'm here to ask and thank you for the support of the community, but also to ask for you to
vote for option one.
Thank you so much.
Thank you for your comments.
Ashley?
Good evening, City Council.
My name is Ashley Powers Clark.
I'm the Homeless Education Services Coordinator for the Sacramento City Unified School District.
And I'm here to just thank you for ranking our proposal so high.
We scored the second highest out of all of the applications.
And the reason why that happened is because the work that we are proposing to do is completely
aligned with the values of the city.
This work is going to fund youth leadership to help prevent homelessness at two specific
school sites, that being Luther Burbank and Hiram Johnson.
I believe there's no place better to invest if you want to prevent youth homelessness than
working within the schools.
I know there are some concerns about public agencies funding public agencies.
And I will say that the first phase of our project is empowering young people on the ground
who have had experiences with homelessness to make their schools safe to come out and identify
as unaccompanied and get the support you need.
And I'll tell you as a social worker that has a lot of experience on the ground working
with this, there's nothing worse than being at school on a Friday night at 5 o'clock
and having a family walk into your office and having absolutely nowhere for them to go.
This is why we need strategic and cross-sector involved investments in this work.
And that's exactly what our proposal plans to do.
So you can hold us accountable for that.
You can expect results from us.
I'll say since taking over the program and since our investments in COVID, the Sacramento
City Unified School District has stepped up their investment because of the advocacy that
we've seen from our young people and the advocates that we've built in the community.
So you can hold the district accountable for holding the line on their own investments.
And you can trust that you'll be hearing from our young people here and at those board meetings.
So thank you so much for your consideration.
Thank you for your comments.
Mercedes Parker, then Malachi Chaney-McLean.
Good evening, Mercedes.
Resident of District 4.
I'm here representing California Youth Connection.
We are a youth-led organization that serves current and former foster youth advocating for policy
and practice and legislative change.
Very huge supporters of the Children's Fund as well as the Guaranteed Income Program.
I'm here today to stand in solidarity with the SAC LGBT Center.
And when we reflect on the original purpose of the Children's Fund and the issues that it was intended to address,
homelessness, mental health, violence prevention, substance abuse prevention, queer youth are at the intersection of that.
And of course, are overrepresented when we talk about homelessness, when we talk about foster youth issues.
So I just want to make sure that we are prioritizing them and that I also want to support previous comments
that suggested that we look into the overspending that's occurring in financial mismanagement happening within the SAC City Police Department
to secure additional funding to make sure that we are doing right by our children.
I also just want to add that in the next RFA process, I also agree with previous commenters that we look into making sure
that that is an equitable process in supporting nonprofits and meeting the requirements to support a successful application.
That's it. Thank you so much.
Thanks for your comments.
Malachi Chaney-McClain, then Keon Bliss.
Malachi, then Keon Bliss, then D'Angelo Mack.
Good evening. My name is Malachi LeSean-McClain.
I wanted to stand in solidarity with the LGBTQ community,
as well as with former foster youth and current foster youth.
I have an older brother.
I do hold that identity with me in every room that I walk in.
And I am also a transmasculine individual.
I use he, him pronouns.
And 30% of former foster youth identify as LGBTQ.
This statistic is quite high compared to other communities.
And I just want to make sure that this funding is placed towards communities of care,
communities that have not turned their back on former foster youth.
We just got AB 562 to get past kinship care practices.
And with that, we're seeing that kinship looks different for everyone.
It's not just one individual family plan.
And I just want to emphasize that,
that our community is vast and very diverse,
and it does not look the same in every setting.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Next speaker is Keon Bliss, then D'Angelo Mack, then Kenneth Duncan.
There's really not much I can say better than the youth organizers
and young folks in this community that have been coming up to you
demanding the resources that is rightfully theirs.
But I can point to you the fact that you have a fiduciary duty
to actually manage our budget responsibly,
and this council tonight is leaving no less than $9 million sitting on the table
because you're too afraid to cut police department vacancies.
I mean, we listened.
Besides just the scandals that have been popping up in the Sacramento Bee and other media,
we listened on May 20th to the chief of police
and the Sacramento police officer's president lie through their teeth at you
to claim that their vacancies aren't actually real,
that those are filled positions that they will have to lay off or cut
if you dare consider addressing those.
And even by their own best measurements,
by the true vacancies that they just magically made up,
that's at least $11 million that you could be contributing to youth services right here.
Public safety, the police and fire department alone,
make up no less than 66% of our discretionary dollars.
That's in the general fund.
And none of you are considering even cutting that?
They're getting $254 million this year.
There are at least 107 vacancies that have been vacant for more than six months
and at least 35 vacancies that have been vacant for over two years.
And you're too chicken shit to cut those positions?
You've got to be kidding me.
There's a reason for this for those of us that pay attention,
and I'll get to that here.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Our next speaker is D'Angelo Mack.
Your time is complete.
Keon Bliss, you've exceeded your speaking time.
Please stop speaking and take your seat.
By continuing to speak, you're disrupting the orderly conduct of the meeting.
You're in violation of Chapter 5 of the City Council Rules of Procedure.
You do not stop.
You'll be ordered to leave the meeting.
Our next speaker is D'Angelo Mack.
I like this going good today.
I like it.
Good evening, y'all.
This is the first time I've been in front of a new guard.
So I'm D'Angelo Mack, resident of District 7.
I used to be the director of the First Response Transformation Campaign,
which saved cities millions in public safety.
I actually helped frame the actual public safety resolution,
one of the original framers.
And I started the very first hospital-based violence intervention program here in the city.
So in regard to beliefs and money, we're just not brave anymore.
I know you're afraid because you're fearful people.
Some of you weren't brave kids, so there was no way you'd be brave adults.
For those of you who consider yourself brave kids,
I want you to think about why you were brave then.
Bravery usually rises when bigger, more boisterous obstacles present itself
as a challenge to those who are simply looking for a peaceful and safe existence.
For those of you who were brave kids,
you may remember bravery wasn't a thought, it was a reaction.
Before your mind could really process, your bodies were already set in motion.
You had no clue what the outcome of this motion would garner.
You just knew you had to do something differently.
Fear causes you to make the same mistakes every time these obstacles come your way.
We've done this before, and we are where we are because of that.
It's funny, we fill these chambers and pour our hearts out
when most of the time your minds are already made up.
But take just a moment and ask yourself,
am I making my decision today based on cowering under the shadow
of a bigger, more boisterous obstacle present?
Or will I remember the kid or somebody's kid
and choose to react with brave?
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Our next speaker is Kenneth Duncan, then Aki.
Kenneth, then Aki.
How you doing, council?
I stand before you with my daughters.
Hopefully we'll be future leaders here in this city.
Hello, Renee.
Rick Jennings.
Phil, we met earlier this week.
I stand to represent Marina Vista, CV Circle,
the forgotten community here in Sacramento.
We're an active nonprofit there in the projects.
Let's just be real.
What it is, it's the projects.
I've been there on the shoulders of Mr. Roberts,
who actually gave me the grace to come into the community
as a young college student.
I've been there for almost 12 years now.
I asked to be considered for the Measure L.
Like Mr. Roberts said,
we would like to be explaining these processes a little better.
We weren't in the top 10 scores, but we're doing the work.
We're in the community three to four times a week.
Just this last two weeks, I had two kids shot.
And then last year, at least three.
So it's getting to a point I can't even keep count
of how many youth were losing and being wounded
to gun violence and senseless gang violence.
But we're more so a prevention program.
We're working with the babies from first grade
all the way to 12th grade.
And then we get called and, you know,
ask for favors to do more things in CB Circle
after a baby is killed.
But we're doing the work when babies are living and thriving.
We got kids in college who get overlooked
because they're not the kids being killed.
I got kids at HBCUs who are in Ball Out Academy.
They're in Black Boys Build.
And they're in these prevention programs
that need support from the city.
So I stand before you asking for you all
to support our organization
and think about the babies my daughter's age
who are walking around CB Circle with no support.
It's walking distance.
It's walking distance from here.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Our next speaker is Aki, then Lambert.
Next speaker is Aki, then Lambert.
I do want to remind members of the public
you have two minutes to address the council
and the timer is on the screen behind me.
Yes.
Please proceed.
So good evening, everyone.
My name is Aki Ramirez.
I am representing CYC,
but right now I am representing LGBT Youth Center.
I am a youth, actually.
I'm 16 years old,
and I come from Elk Grove to use this space.
And for me to be in there
and seeing the budget cuts,
I mean, it's frightening
because I don't know where would I go.
I mean, I use therapy for that.
I have mental health.
And for me, as a queer person,
I'm gender fluid.
And while it's frightening to see
that they're getting rid of some things,
sections are cutting off,
and while for me, I mean,
at times, okay,
at times I feel like hopeless,
and while sometimes I just feel
I want to kill myself, suicide.
And while the thing is,
that place gives me hope and joy,
and while it's wonderful to be there.
And while I choose the section one,
I choose the first person who spoke here
because it's hard to be by myself.
That community is my family.
I am in foster care right now.
I'm by myself.
But that place is hope for me to be living.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Our next speaker is Lambert,
then Mack Worthy,
then Jaash Roussel,
then Kaylee Tran.
I'm hoping that the Sacramento Bee,
the Sacramento News and Review,
and the Sacramento Observer
needs to step it up, too.
Now, the Grant High School Pacers football team
won the state championship,
and when they came into these chambers,
I was here.
And what did I tell them?
When you finish taking your photo out,
you let me step in there.
And what did I ask for?
For those of you who don't know
what it's like to win it all,
to the victor go the spoils.
The kings know nothing about winning it all,
neither does the Sacramento Republic.
No, no, it has nothing to do with mockery.
We're talking about winning it all.
And these are teenagers.
What did I say?
What did I say when I came up here?
You should be paying attention, coach.
You should be helping with this.
For instance,
when you win it all,
you should have a parade.
The city of Sacramento
never gave these teenagers a parade.
They never did give them any tickets
to go see the kings play.
They never did give them banquets.
They never gave them anything.
And by the way,
some of them graduated last week.
So they'll never have a parade
because they've gone on.
And this $17 million,
a lot of it comes from cannabis.
This type of money
should be coming to Del Paso Heights
because of what they're doing for this city.
They're making this city look great.
And you mean to tell me
you can't find money
to give these teenagers
what I just stated?
I was here
when you were doing your photo ops.
And I said,
what about job applications?
They still...
Thank you for your comments.
Our next speaker is Mack Worthy.
Then Josh Rosal.
We can't hear her while now.
Money for youth.
You know,
I live here a long time.
All is theater today.
And you give two minutes about youth.
You know,
I got something
happening at my house.
Guns.
I can't get the report.
I'll get it in front of you
before I want to go
to the FBI, John.
But you got corruption
in your law enforcement.
Very serious corruption.
You got some of the best
that I've met
in your law enforcement.
It's sad, people,
to have the corruption
that you have here
and nobody
address this corruption.
It's sad
that you can't get
a report back
for four to six weeks
from the police department.
Now,
that's a camera
and I...
in that camera.
You could have people
sit down
and get that out.
But you rely on
a lot of bullshit
when you should be...
Theater,
you use today.
Why do you use
that theater tonight
to help people
with their babies?
It's because
of your egressive.
No leadership.
No management.
Some people here
should be in jail
here making decisions.
The corruption.
Why is the corruption
there and you accept it?
Why are people
getting awards
with the corruption here?
Because we don't have
the people in the city
the neighborhood
can stand up
because they are
on a little grant
here.
And go back,
I told your previous mayor,
you cannot make it
off grants and bonds.
You gotta invest.
You don't have
the wealth in this town
that pushes
the investments
that can come here.
People are pulled here
and they'll do anything
for a dollar.
Next speaker is
Juash and Kaylee Tran.
Good evening,
mayor and council members.
My name is Joshua Saul
and I reside
in District 8.
I'm 18 years old
and I'm here
as a youth advocate
representing
the Reclamation Project
at 916.
That is a 100%
youth-ran grassroot
social justice organization
dedicated to supporting
the marginalized communities
within Sacramento County
and throughout
the state of California.
Now I'm here today
to remind us
who this fund is for
and to think of
what support of this fund
means long term.
As someone who works closely
with our most vulnerable community,
these being my friends,
family, neighbors,
I'm grateful that efforts
are being made
through this budget
to support our youth,
but these efforts
can only continue
with the full support
of this fund
as building up our youth,
our future community leaders,
is something that can only happen
with time and attention.
Now we need to focus
on making sure this fund
is one that truly invests
in the future of our community,
not just one-time solutions.
We need to make sure
that it is with the city's
full intention
that the goals put in place
through this budget
are with our youth in mind.
The city has a duty
to invest in preventative
rather than reactive actions.
We must focus
on ensuring the future
of our youth,
the ones who will be
inheriting this community
and who will tend to it.
If we do not plan
for long-term investment now,
future generations
will be left to correct
the consequences
with no foundation
to build off of to do so.
Our young people
are our future
and our present.
How we respond today
will define how safe,
equitable,
and livable our city is
for decades to come.
Please ensure
the general fund
includes equitable
youth investments
and prioritizes
youth violence prevention,
mental health,
and homelessness prevention.
I thank you
for your time and leadership.
I believe we can make
lasting progress
with thoughtful,
forward-looking investments.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Kaylee Tran,
then Cao Yee Tao.
Good evening,
Mayor and Council members.
My name is Kaylee Tran
and I'm an incoming senior
at Sheldon High School.
I was born and raised
in Sacramento.
As a resident
who is part
of the developing generation
that will be responsible
for Sacramento
in only a few decades,
I'm here today
to urge us all
to think about
the long-term impact
of this budget.
I appreciated seeing
the Council's support
and facilitation
of our growth
by restoring violence
prevention funding
and protecting city roles
that support equity
and inclusion.
It gives youth,
like myself,
reason to become better people
and build a better future.
We can't just focus
on one-time solutions.
Without support systems
and available resources,
many are left
with no choice
but to rely on crime
and violence
to make it out
of their unfortunate situation.
These are preventative
and cost-effective solutions
that provide a restorative path
for youth to thrive
and become the productive citizens
of Sacramento that we need.
If we continue
to prioritize short-term fixes
and reactive spending,
future generations
will inherit the consequences,
both fiscal and social.
They'll have to redo the work
this Council failed to do.
Is that the legacy
that this Council wants to leave?
This budget deficit
is not just a financial issue.
It's a moral one.
Please ensure
the general fund
includes equitable youth investments
and prioritizes
youth violence prevention.
Thank you for your time
and leadership.
Thank you.
Good evening,
Mayor and Council.
Listen to our youth.
Listen to our youth.
Yeah, that's right.
Earlier,
we talked about Pride Month
and Gun Violence Awareness Month.
So I know that this Council
supports these things,
but show us
in your investments.
Don't just say
that you care
about youth and families.
Show us
in the budget.
The reality is that
if you wanted to,
you could actually fund
all of these youth programs.
All of them.
All of them.
Measure L
was never enough.
And I can't imagine
if we didn't have Measure L
what baseline
we would even have.
Measure L
is not enough.
It is less than
one percent
of our budget.
That's right.
So you all talk about
supporting our youth
and families,
but instead of
investing in our youth,
you are increasing
the police budget
while making significant
cuts to youth parks
and community enrichment.
Two programs
are actually employing
our young people,
preventing crime,
and making our neighborhoods
beautiful and safer.
Investment in prevention
saves us money,
and it is fiscal responsibility.
I am disappointed
that this council
did not explore
all options
when only one council member,
Council Member Vang,
dared to evaluate
reallocating police vacancies,
and we know
that there are inefficiencies
and mismanagement
of those overtime funds.
It shouldn't take courage
to evaluate
all options on the table.
This is the minimum,
the minimum of your job
as a policymaker.
So please be a responsible
policymaker.
And that means
being transparent.
We've been waiting weeks
for you all to consider
these two scenarios.
So if there is something else
that's floating around
that we, the public,
have not been aware of,
that is a breach
of community trust.
Fund all of that.
Thank you for your comments.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Our next speaker is Sandra Vang,
then Marbella Sala,
then April Javist.
Good evening, Mayor McCarty
and council members.
My name is Sandra Vang,
and I am a youth organizer
with Long Intervaling Politics.
I am from District 8.
I want to take a moment
to express gratitude
towards the organizers
behind the Sacramento Children's Fund
and our commissioners
for holding down the work.
They truly have the youth's
best interests in mind.
At times when things feel uncertain
at a federal level,
it's even more critical
that we protect our local investments
in youth people,
or young people.
These funds are created
with a purpose,
and using these funds
as a replacement
not only breaks trust,
but also puts our future
at jeopardy.
Aside from the two scenarios
that was presented
a few weeks ago,
there has been news
that there's a third scenario
floating around right now,
and it's really important
that if that's occurring
that we're transparent
and staying true
to the SIP still.
Please do not further delay
getting funds out
to our community.
Thank you for your time
and happy pride.
Thank you for your comments.
Marbella, then April.
Good evening.
I just realized
that when I come up here,
I don't introduce myself.
I'm Marbella,
and I'm the Measure U
Commissioner for District 3
and also President
of our Land Northgate
Neighborhood Association.
I'm here just to reiterate
what I said last time
a couple weeks ago,
but I also want to just commend
Darrell Roberts
for acknowledging the fact
that he ranked number one
because he had the infrastructure
to complete that application.
He had the wherewithal to do it,
and he also acknowledged
that smaller community-based organizations
that are doing difficult work,
that are doing the work
in the community,
didn't have the infrastructure
to respond to an application
that was designed.
I don't know if it was consultant
or whoever.
The application was designed
as a barrier
to those smaller community organizations,
and I hope as you deliberate,
you take that into consideration
and make some modifications.
And my last point,
it still is a shame
that we read the land acknowledgement
of the importance
of being on Native American land,
yet not one Native American
community-based youth organization
is receiving this money,
and that's a shame.
That's it.
Thank you.
Next speaker is April Javist,
then Maximilian Rosa.
Hi there.
My name is April Javist.
I'm with the Sacramento Literacy Foundation.
I want to thank the staff
and the supervisors
for allocating funds
to our organization
to our culturally relevant book giveaway
for patients zero to five
at WellSpace in scenario one.
WellSpace primarily serves
low-income, undocumented,
and homeless patients,
which is why we're working with them.
Research shows that reading
is correlated with nearly every positive
and negative life outcome,
including mental health,
health, employment, and incarceration.
I know all things
that people here are concerned about.
Research also shows
that books in the home
is as important
to a child's college trajectory
as their parents' education
and job attainment level.
So right now,
more kids cannot read
at grade level than can in Sacramento.
Council Member Vang,
I would like to thank you
for your leadership on this initiative.
I really appreciated the words
you had two weeks ago.
Very clear, very understandable.
Mayor and Council,
thank you for your partnership
in getting kids ready to read,
and I look forward
to working with you over the years.
Thank you for your comments.
Maximilian Rosa,
then Nadia Nazi.
I have 10 more speakers.
Good evening, Mayor and Council Members.
I know many of you
through the work I do in the community.
I'm the Director of Sustainability
for Sierra Service Project,
the CEO for Shroom House Mycology.
We're opening up a mushroom farm
in Rogers District,
also my neighborhood
where I grew up in Del Paso Heights,
and I'm one of the Measure U
community advisory commissioners as well.
I had some remarks prepared,
but I'm going to speak
from the heart tonight
because I'm feeling very motivated
by some of the youth
who commented earlier.
We are being recommended
for funding,
and we're very grateful for that.
Also, the scale of funding available
is very minimal.
I've spent a lot of my career
grant writing to fund the work
in my community
that needs to be done
because a lot of opportunities
just don't exist
for us in North Sac, South Sac,
and many communities
across the city.
The scale of work
that needs to be done
to address issues of youth,
which I've spent my career
focused on
because as a youth,
many of those programs
did not exist
except for Darrell Roberts
in the Roberts Family Community Center
who's been around forever.
So much appreciation
to the work they do,
the work they do at CFF.
That was one of my first jobs
out of college.
And I'm here to say
that there is a lot of collaboration
that could be encouraged.
I wrote our grant,
and we scored
one of the highest scores.
I'd be happy
to provide technical assistance,
workshops,
host them at my office
so folks can have
enough time
and opportunity
and figure out
how to craft
a compelling
and strong narrative.
That will still not address
the issue
of there not being
enough funding
for everybody.
I say this
as somebody who asked
for the absolute maximum
that I'd be willing
to sacrifice
some of our money
to make sure
some of these other organizations
can get funding as well.
And the last point
that I need to make
to the young lady
who said she considered suicide
is that we love you
and we are...
Thank you for your comments.
Nadia.
Nadia.
Nadia,
then Heather Haight.
Good afternoon.
I'm Amy McCarty
and City Council Members.
My name is Nadia Niazi
and I currently serve
as the Vice Chair
of Sacramento County's
Juvenile Justice Commission.
I've also been a proud
resident of District 7
for over 30 years.
I've spent much
of my life working
to support young people
in our community,
particularly those facing
the most difficult
and vulnerable circumstances.
In my role,
I work closely with youth,
navigating conflict challenges,
aging out of the foster care,
re-entering society
after involvement
with the justice system,
or struggling
to find stability
with family
or community support.
These young people
aged 16 to 24
are often the most at risk,
including LGBT youth,
youth of color,
and those with histories
of trauma and disconnection.
Without meaningful intervention,
too many of them
will fall into cycles
of homelessness,
incarceration,
and unemployment.
To address this,
I founded Fitra
seven years ago,
a nonprofit based
in Sacramento
that provides paid job training,
life skills,
development,
and long-term mentorship.
Fitra is one of the most innovative,
impactful programs
we have in Sac County.
What makes us different
is our approach.
We don't focus
on managing problems
through mediation
or crisis response.
We help youth
become their own solution.
We proposed expansion,
including critical education
on issues
that includes their life,
including drug
and gun violence prevention workshops.
Despite our proven track record
and deep community roots,
I was disappointed to see
that Fitra was not included
on either of the funding scenarios
presented to the City Council.
I respectfully urge
the City Council
to revisit the allocation
of Measure L funds.
Even partial support
will allow us
to continue delivering
hands-on training,
structure,
and mentorship
to youth
who are too often
left behind.
Due to the recent
federal funding cuts,
we are at risk
of losing essential resources
to keep our program running.
This is a critical moment,
not just for our organization,
but for the youth
who rely on us
to help them navigate
a way from us.
Thank you for your comments.
Our next speaker is Heather Haight,
then Michael Melton.
Good evening,
Mayor and Council members.
My name is Heather Haight,
the Executive Director
of the Greenhouse
in District 3.
I'd like to speak
to both the budget
and to Measure L.
I want to thank you
for the great questions
that you asked last meeting
about Measure L
and the work that you've done
since in response.
One thing I've been thinking
about since the last council
that stuck with me
is that there were
no native and indigenous CBOs
or efforts on Scenario 1 or 2.
There are many tribes
that we acknowledge
at the beginning
of each city meeting
to express gratitude
and honor
to the many tribes
who have stewarded the lands
that we live on
for generations
upon generations
and to put this gratitude
into action
to reciprocate
in some ways.
I would ask the council
to prioritize funding
these CBOs
in our budget
and in Measure L's distribution.
And I also appreciated
the comment made
by Julie Roten
from Stanford Settlement
who observed
that 85% of applicants
for Measure L
were CBOs
and agree that it makes sense
to offer 85%
of the funding
accordingly
to the most vulnerable
and marginalized youth
in our community
along those lines.
and finally,
it has already been raised
by many on the council
and our youth here
that the youth
are the future
who are going to be sitting here
on the dais
in the future.
And so,
I would ask
that the budget
reflects this critical investment
in our youth
in the future.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Michael Melton
and Amber Scott.
How y'all doing?
I'm Michael Melton,
the rapper named Red Boy.
Off top,
I want to say
it's crazy
that y'all thinking
about giving the police
the drug money,
you know,
after years
of arresting people
for selling drugs
and then turn around
and want to give them
the drug money.
Y'all need to give that
to the youth.
Okay.
It's either you give it
to the youth programs
or the youth
is going to be programming
in juvenile hall,
jail,
or prison,
or dead.
You know,
the Robinson Center
changed my life
for the better,
you know.
I worked there
when I was young.
That was my first job.
You know,
amongst others,
Darrell Roberts
is a great mentor.
And, you know what I mean,
his after-school programs
was real good.
It was tutors there.
It was help.
You know,
if you played basketball,
you know,
a lot of people
grew up, you know,
stayed out of trouble.
A lot of,
I put my sons there.
They played basketball there.
St. Paul,
we played basketball there.
That was a good place.
And then moved
to Del Paso Heights
and it's still a great place.
And I want to just let y'all
know that y'all need
to put the funding
to the youth,
you know,
because without giving it
to the youth,
it's like out of time
is a devil's playground.
You know what I'm talking
about?
That's where all this
violence is going on.
We don't want to fund
the police
to put our kids in jail.
We want to fund programs
to keep our children
out of jail.
We want to,
we want to,
we need wood chops.
We need metal programs.
We need all kinds
of different things
because what if California
separates from everybody?
It looks like we might,
we might even separate
from Trump.
From,
from,
what if we become
our own country?
We need to train
our children up right.
They are the future.
We need to,
we need more programs
to stop the violence
and,
and,
and to help the youth.
That's,
that's all I'd like to say.
Thank you guys very much.
Give your comments.
Amber Scott.
Following Amber is
Abu Sai.
Amber.
Amber.
Amber.
I have six.
So,
following Amber
is Abu Sai.
Oh,
I thought you said
Amber stopped.
Pardon me?
I thought you said
Amber stopped.
I did.
Please proceed.
Great.
Food Literacy Center
started right here
in Sacramento
at a school
in Oak Park.
As the founder
and CEO,
I am excited
to announce
that this year
we reached 23 schools
just 14 years later
and the Sacramento
Children's Fund
grant offers us
the opportunity
to make significant
progress on our goal
to expand.
Over the course
of the grant,
we plan to double
our reach
and our nonprofit
is significantly
poised for growth.
We are currently
the most requested
after school program
in Sac City Unified
and we serve all
of the schools
in Roble Unified
and we have
a wait list
of schools
that are interested
in our program
across the city.
Demand for our program
is high
because it works
and kids love it.
In a community
with a 40%
childhood obesity rate
which primarily strikes
children who don't
have enough to eat,
our program
offers a food justice
solution
that builds both
healthy habits
and resilience.
Our solution
to this problem
received a high score
because we have
years of successful
program delivery
under our belt.
Our program works.
94% of our students
fearlessly taste
a new fruit
or vegetable
every week
in our hands-on
cooking and nutrition
program.
Kids tell us
that the favorite
part of our program
is getting to try
new foods.
In the most recent
school year,
we reached
Sacramento students
in districts
1, 2, 4, 5,
6, and 8.
We're eager
to do even more
at a time
when the need
for our programs
is at an all-time high.
So thank you
for your consideration
of the Sacramento
Children's Fund.
Thank you for your
comments.
Ayub and then
Lauren Puello.
Good evening
to the Vice Mayor
and all Council members.
I'm here to represent
FITRA.
FITRA.
I'm a volunteer
there.
And pretty much
we're a non-profit
organization that
helps youth
who are coming
out of detention
centers or juvenile
to stay out of
homelessness.
And we give them
paid jobs
and show them
how to get
a paid job
and keep it.
We lost our
funding due to
their federal
funding cuts.
and right now
we're having
a hard time
staying open.
Any funding
would be appreciated.
We didn't make it
to scenario one
or two.
It's really hard
right now
with the way
things are.
We don't have
an AC system
in our warehouse.
So that's kind
of hurting
the youth
in the summer.
but as of
right now
any funding
would be great.
I'm here to
ask any of
the vice
I'm here to
ask the vice
mayor, mayor
or any of the
council members
for help
and it would
be muchly
appreciated.
Thank you.
Thank you for
your comments.
Lauren
Polito
then Barry
Accius.
Good evening
city council
members.
My name is
Lauren Polito
and I'm here
as a lifelong
resident and
member of our
LGBTQ plus
community and
to show strong
support for the
Sacramento LGBT
Community Center
when considering
investments from
this measure and
future budget
allocations.
Thank you to
council member
Vang for
emphasizing the
need to back
resolutions with
meaningful financial
and budget
support and
thank you to
Katie Maple
council member
Maple and
council member
Kaplan for
bringing forward
this resolution
celebrating LGBTQ
Pride Month
and LGBTQ
people.
I don't
believe this
is purely
coincidence that
along with
funding for our
youth we're
hearing on the
same evening as
honoring this
resolution.
As a city that
proudly became
the first to
declare itself as
sanctuary city
for trans
people Sacramento
carries a
responsibility not
just a symbolic
one but tangible
commitments to
safety equity and
support for
LGBTQ youth.
We know the
statistics surrounding
LGBTQ regarding
mental health
suicidality and
about the dangers
our youth face
when they do not
have affirming
spaces but beyond
the numbers are
real people.
Young people a few
from what you
heard tonight who
need our support
now more than
ever.
The Sacramento
LGBT community
center is one of
the only places in
our region where
LGBTQ youth can
access culturally
competent mental
health care affirming
services and
community.
As federal funding
continues to be
stripped away we
need our city to
step in and step
up.
I urge you honor
your sanctuary city
commitment not just
in words but in
action.
Include the LGBT
community center in
our city's budget for
youth mental health
because our youth
can't wait and they
deserve more.
They deserve to
survive and they
deserve to thrive.
Thank you for your
time, your leadership,
your consideration and
hopefully your support
in including the
Sacramento LGBTQ
community center in
investments.
Thank you.
Thank you for your
comments.
I have three more
speakers.
Barry and Kim
Talker, then Alberto
Rigaldo.
Good evening, city
council members.
Barry Axios, voice of
the youth, founder and
CEO.
I stand here more than
frustrated but
disappointed that time
and time again, you
know, we have to fight
for the crumbs of the
city to save our youth.
To continuously have to
go back and forth with
other deserving
organizations that do
the work and to be in
this pit of fire to
figure out who can have
the best narrative on
paper.
But sometimes that
doesn't translate in the
real work on the ground
and on the floor with
people that really do the
work on a day-to-day
basis.
I'd rather get your
funding than get your
recognition.
I don't need awards.
I just need the funding and
the support.
And if individuals are
telling me, because each
one of the districts, I have
youth there that
participate in the Voice
of the Youth program.
Each one of your districts,
I've probably done a vigil
there.
I've supported families.
So I'm being pat on the
shoulder and being told
you're doing a great job.
Thank you for all that
you've done for our youth.
Where does that show in
the funding?
Where does that show in
the support?
We're in June and we're in
the middle of mayhem when
it comes to violence with
our youth.
And we still have no
funding for any
programming.
Bodies upon bodies, vigils
upon vigils.
I could promise that I've
probably been on more
vigils than I've probably
went to graduations.
And I've went to a lot of
graduations.
But the frustration is we
know every year what is
going to happen.
Around April, May, things
start sparking up.
For the simple fact that we
always have to come back to
this table and fight for
funding and we all have to
be pit against each other to
get funding, it's
asinizing, it's diabolical,
it's frustrating, and it's
not fair.
Everyone, and I clearly say
everyone should be funding.
Stop showing us that you do
not care.
Thank you for your
comments.
Your time is complete.
The next speaker is Kim,
then Alberto.
Kim, then Alberto.
Can I go first?
You mind if I go?
Kim?
Is that okay?
That's fine.
Okay.
Thank you.
All right.
My name is Albert Regalado.
I'm the president of Sacramento
United Soccer Club.
We serve over 1,000 kids each
year, kids from all over the
city.
I'm here, first of all, to
thank you for investing in our
youth as they are the key to
our future.
I think we all agree on that.
I'm here to support utilizing
Measure L funds to replace the
all-weather field over at
Granite Regional Park as it will
offer many benefits to the
greater Sacramento community,
youth, and the Sacramento United
Soccer Club in furthering our
mission.
Here's some ways that we foresee
that funding benefiting everyone
relating to everything we've been
hearing about today and
empowering our youth.
Measure L in Sacramento aims to
support programs and services for
children and youth under 25 years
old.
Key goals of Measure L support mental
health and emotional health of
children and youth.
This involves providing mental
health counseling.
We have a mental health resource
page trying to normalize the
discussion and remove stigma.
We believe that participation in
sports like soccer can have
significant positive benefits to
mental health, reducing stress and
anxiety for young people.
We believe that we help to prevent
youth violence through engagement,
discipline, promoting an active
lifestyle.
We provide all these resources
through our programs.
We are educators.
We serve ourselves as educators who
utilize soccer as the tool to better
prepare our youth for the world
ahead.
This field allows us to provide
resources year-round to many low-
income families.
We keep many kids safe and off the
streets.
We do this through our leadership
opportunities and our youth
mentorship programs.
We have work programs for the kids
to get real-life experience and work
experience there.
We work in partnership with the city
utilizing the facility that we may
maintain with pride and we really have
a sense of home there.
So once again, we want to thank you
for the-
Thank you for your comments.
Our next speaker is Kim.
Hi, my name is Kim.
I have two children, both boys, and
they belong to Sacramento United as well.
I wanted to come here tonight to provide you a little bit more of a background to our club.
Statistically, our club is broken down in terms of 63% are minority.
About 49% of the club members are Hispanic and Latinos.
In addition to that, 47% of our members reside in a Title I area.
So in that sense, you can tell that we definitely need your support and your consideration for Measure L for our club.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Weissner, I have no more speakers.
Okay.
Thank you so much.
Well, I punched up to speak, but I'm sitting in the mayor's seat.
So does anybody want to go first or just go for it?
All right.
Cool.
All right.
So I recognize that tonight is a decade in the making.
A lot of ballot initiatives that went through to get us to where we're at today.
And so I just want to thank everybody for coming out two weeks in a row to have this conversation.
To the Sacramento Children's Fund city team, thank you for doing your best to navigate, to be fair, to be transparent,
to not have bias, to just like be a stickler to the charter and what was passed by the voters.
And to the commission where we all selected different commissioners in our community to advocate for these funds.
I just want to make clear that two weeks ago when the scenarios were presented to us, scenario one, two,
and then we had a community member send us scenario three,
the two scenarios that city staff gave us that day were strictly examples of what was possible.
Something for us to react to as mayor and council.
And I just feel like a lot of those scenarios gave organizations the impression that they would be receiving a certain amount of money
and that it was set in stone.
But at that council meeting, we were still having those conversations because it was our first opportunity
to see who applied, what their score was, what their priority was.
And at that time, we didn't have the description of what these programs would do, us as mayor and council,
because there was no summary, which is why I requested for it to be continued so that I can know and understand
what the programs were that were being evaluated.
And today, obviously, there's going to be people that walk away thinking, hey, I lost some money, or hey, I gained some money,
or hey, I just was never even considered because of, you know, the ability to write grants.
And I think that there's no easy scenario that will make everyone here happy or full mayor and council happy.
And each of us has had the ability to ask staff to create, you know, different scenarios based on geography, fund goals, and districts.
And we can do our best to balance the fund goals and districts equitably.
And so this is the question for us today.
I mean, we have the two scenarios.
We can still, or we can create our own tonight of what we would like to see.
And I think that the questions that we ask ourselves is, do we pick one of the fund goals and funnel all the money to that fund goal in this round,
based on the highest scoring applicants?
Do we pick one of the most underserved districts and funnel all the money there for this go-round?
Philosophically, do you choose fewer organizations who get more money or more organizations who get less money?
So instead of the 80%, do you pick 70%, do you pick 60%?
And if you pick 60%, then you're able to, like, fund more nonprofit organizations that applied,
more nonprofit organizations that maybe didn't have the ability to write fancy grants,
which last time we had this conversation, we heard that from everybody here saying, like,
hey, like the people that don't have professional grant writers just didn't score as well as the people that do.
So if we decrease the percentage of our nonprofits of who is getting money from 80% to 70% or 60%,
then it could give the opportunity for some of the lower scoring nonprofits to get some money.
And that's a decision that, you know, we can make here tonight.
Do we give less percentage of the ask or more?
And then some organizations requested the most, you know, some organizations apply for $1.5 million,
while some organizations apply for $300,000.
And then the ones that did score for $1.5, sometimes those are the ones that have more professional grant writers
and are getting more money, and that leaves out the $300,000 grant application of that really tiny, small nonprofit
that, like, did the best to their ability.
And so I think that as we deliberate today, council comments and questions and move forward as a next step,
that's a question for all of us to ask.
Do we go with one of the scenarios staff has already presented?
Or do we say, hey, we want to fund more nonprofits,
and maybe we reduce the percentage of 80% to 70% of what they requested?
And so I do believe that the process can be better.
As mentioned, you know, there's smaller organizations that were left out,
and we can do this again in three years and make some changes and work with the commission to help set these parameters.
You know, there was five categories that we could have chosen from, from zero to five, gun violence,
really learning, you know, in what I think for the next time the commission should focus on, like,
hey, which of the five priorities that people can apply for funds do we want to focus on?
Gun violence today, we passed a resolution on that, so maybe we should have focused more of the monies,
40% of the monies, to gun violence versus only 20% to zero to five.
And so for the future, I think we need to be more thoughtful on this so that everybody kind of understands
the direction of what we're looking for and the values of the city of Sacramento
to be able to just be more fair and transparent in this process.
So that's all my comments for right now.
Councilor Mayor Bank.
Thank you, Vice Mayor Talamontis.
I didn't queue up because we have a proposal in front of us that was given by your staff,
and so I was hoping that you would explain this proposal before I make my comments.
But I'm happy to make my comments, and then if you want to present your proposal,
that would be great just because I want to have a better understanding of it.
Oh, sure.
Yeah, so if you can present that because it was just given to us on the dais so that we can share that with the community,
that would be great.
Okay, cool.
So I worked with Council Member Dickinson on a proposal that allowed for, well, that reduced the community.
So right now the community-based organizations that were listed in scenario one were being funded at 80%.
And so I thought, why not give an opportunity to more organizations and fund them all at 60% instead of the 80%.
And if we did the 60% of the awarded, it allows for three new organizations to also get a bite at the apple,
and maybe more can-
Thanks, Mindy.
If you can pull that up, that'd be great so the public can see it.
Thank you.
Can we get the document camera, please?
Doug, can we have document camera, please?
It's not-
It's not-
It's basically like scenario one, except for we reduced it from 80% of the organizations getting money to 60%,
and that allowed for three new organizations to be eligible.
Go ahead.
Can we have camera approved?
That's okay.
That's it.
That's it?
Okay.
So I'll make my-
Okay, thank you.
Yeah, so yeah, I guess I'll just repeat it.
Okay.
So right now staff has two scenarios, and the first scenario, it's 80% of nonprofits being funded at the level that they were asked.
If we do it 60%, it allows for three more organizations to get a bite of the pie.
Okay.
If that's okay with my council colleagues, great.
They know grassroots.
Oh.
Because we were trying to figure out how to incorporate grassroots into grassroots organizations.
Because last time we had a lot of council colleagues say, hey, we want grassroots organizations to be able to, like, get more funds.
But they got more points through the grant application funding for being grassroots.
Thank you.
I'll-
Yeah, just point of order, Vice Mayor Talamantes, so that you don't have to respond back to the audience.
Because I know this is the debate among the council now, so I just wanted to-
Okay.
So just a few things.
So first, I just want to-
First, let me just-
I just want to say thank you to all the young people and community organization who showed up today.
I am always inspired by our young people because you all give me the courage to do the work that we do every single day.
So I just really want to say that you are all brilliant, intelligent, beyond measures.
And I'm just grateful that you were able to have the ability to show up in this space and share your lived experiences.
I know that this vote was delayed two weeks ago because we wanted to make sure, as mayor and council, if we had more questions, if we wanted other scenarios, what would that look like?
And so I did support the delay of the vote in particular and wanted to be a good team player to ensure that all my colleagues had all the information they had.
And so we are here today.
It is three years since the passing of Measure L.
And I just want to thank the Oversight Commission, all the commissioners that I see in the room today.
Thank you for all your hard work.
And I also just want to take this time to thank Renee, Julie, and Jennifer again for your hard work.
I want to acknowledge that the process isn't perfect.
There are critiques that I have about the process as well.
And I know that there are many lessons learned.
And I'm hoping that we will apply those lessons learned to improve the process.
And I'll provide those comments shortly in terms of how we can improve.
But I really just want to take a moment to say thank you again to the young people who worked really hard because they knocked on doors, campaigned so that we could force this mayor and council to set aside funding for young people.
And as I shared before, many young people who fought for this, fought for the ballot measure and fought for this funding are, many of them are actually no longer youth themselves.
They are now parents.
So as I will share, and you heard from the Commons, you know, the Sacramento Children's Fund only makes up less than 1% of our annual budget.
And our young people deserve so much more than minimal support.
They deserve all the opportunities in the world and consistent investment.
And so, you know, I shared two weeks ago that, you know, I was hoping that there would be organization in Mediview and Valley High that would score high.
And that wasn't the case, right, so I was a little bit disappointed.
But I also, you know, took a moment to step back and recognize that, you know, what I don't want happening is that we're pitting youth programs versus youth programs.
And I said this last time, but I do believe that we're still fighting for crumbs, right?
Next item on the agenda actually is our budget.
So I hope that y'all will stay for that item to speak your truth about that item.
In terms of the proposal in front of us, I do really do appreciate Council Member Talamante's submitting scenario three.
And I will also say that scenario one and two is not perfect, right?
Like I shared earlier, there are lessons learned that we need to apply for the funding round in 2027.
And I did just get this literally like right before the council.
So I did get a chance to just scan it and analyze it a little bit.
And I so I do I do have some comments about why I would not support scenario three and why I would still support scenario one, even though not perfect, because there's a lot of adjustment and improvement that needs to be made.
One, I believe, you know, two weeks ago, Vice Mayor Talamante's did note in her comments that, you know, we only have $1, right?
And maybe perhaps we need to focus our intention and be more intentional, right?
And this proposal actually, I feel like actually counters that statement because it stretches the dollars even more from 80 to 60%.
And I just want to stress to folks that the grant itself is over a three-year portion.
And so that grant is actually divided by all of those organizations.
So it's actually still not a lot of funding, right?
Even if you go with scenario one.
The other piece is that the current proposal in front of us doesn't stay true to the SIP, the strategic investment plan that the commission worked on, and also what mayor and this council voted on, which is to ensure that we also support grassroots and emerging organization.
Now, some of those grassroots and emerging organization may not be organization that you wanted to fund it or even what we wanted to fund it, but they follow the process and they were in that category, right?
And so if we don't, if we go with this option up here, we actually would not be in line with the SIP, which was recommended by our commission and voted by us by mayor and council.
And then lastly, I just want to say there is no perfect scenario.
But what I will say is that there is a better scenario.
And the better scenario is ensuring that all of the investment that we want, because we're saying, you know, how many fund buckets can we fund?
How many youth programs can we fund?
The best scenario is making sure that, you know, our ask and those investments that we want to see be reflected in the general budget.
That's the best scenario.
I do believe, however, that this round of this process in particular does need improvement and just some requests to staff in particular.
After this round and when council votes on this, I do believe that we need a more in-depth analysis of the entire RFP process.
There should actually be a report that comes back to the commission and the council about what lessons were learned so that we can make adjustment for the next round.
So I would actually like to make a motion on, because there's no motion on the, on the dice right now, but I would like to make a motion to move forward with scenario one with direction that one staff work with the commission to better.
And then at the commission, to better define strategies.
And I say define strategies in terms of fun goal, because while these dollars, the intent of these dollars were to reach our most vulnerable youth impacted by violence, poverty and trauma.
And I'm not saying that the organizations that are going to be funded that they're not doing that.
Right.
But I want to ensure that that really is happening.
And how you do that is by being more specific in the strategic investment plan, by laying out perhaps the strategic investment plan.
牛we� responsabilize what we need to be 편 and to do to reach those groups in particular.
And so if it's justice-involved youth only for youth violence, then it is.
to reach those groups in particular.
So if justice involved youth only for youth violence,
then it is, right?
And so I would love to see a more specific definition
of the fun goals through the SIP
and obviously leaning on our thought partners
on the commission to help us to help guide that.
And so those would be my recommendation.
I think we should move forward with scenario one
while not perfect, apply lessons learned
with those direction.
And so that is, those are my comments
and I hope that my colleagues will support scenario one
moving forward, thanks.
Thank you so much, Council Member Vang.
Council Member Maple seconds that
and Mayor Pro Tem Guerra is up next.
Thank you, Vice Mayor.
I was gonna second that motion as well.
One issue here, I think I would ask if the maker of the motion
and the second would also ask as part of the direction
to find the time to review the SIP as well.
And both at the commission level at the council level.
Is that, is that if they concur, Vice Mayor?
Yes, I accept.
Absolutely.
I think it should come back to the,
it should go to the commission first
because I think the commission,
our commissioners probably have a lot to say about,
about the process and then it can come back
to the full council.
But yeah, I think we do need to apply lessons learned
so that we can improve the SIP process.
Very good.
And I think that first, first of all,
I think that the alternative,
the scenario that was presented today,
without putting any judgment on the approach,
just the sheer point that it cuts out the emerging,
emerging applicants,
our emerging CBOs,
that goes against the SIP that we voted on.
So if we're going to,
and I'd ask if you could,
if the crowd can please allow the council
to deliberate here too.
But the important thing here is that
if we approve a SIP,
that was on the council.
So if we're going to not concur with the SIP,
then we need to change the SIP.
And there are other things that the council has,
has said that they don't agree with after the review.
So I think it's important for us to make sure
that as we're moving forward,
we're giving clear direction to the commission
on how they're grading.
Because if not,
it's not fair to the commission or the applicants.
They're going off of the scoring standard
that we voted on.
So I think that's the important thing there.
It's that the clarity and transparency.
You know, under this scenario, frankly,
my council district would actually gain
by like, I think, half a million dollars.
And, but again, that wouldn't be fair
to the applicants and the work
that the commission has done
to put together a proposal here.
And what the staff has proposed.
I obviously have concerns about how the SIP
is divided up in on the percentage standpoints,
particularly for those that are other entities
that have a lot deeper pockets
than the city of Sacramento.
So to me, I think that's definitely an area to resolve.
And also, you know, in the future,
I hope that the commission and the council
put a much greater weight on the issue
of supporting the areas of zero to five as well.
Because I think what occurred here under the scenario,
under the best scenario,
and there's no perfect scenario,
is that what occurred is exactly what I had mentioned
would occur before,
which is that there are very few advocates
for those who work in the zero to five realm.
And, and, and, and, and that tends to happen all the time.
So I'll leave it at that.
Thank you, Council Member Vang for this effort.
And again, I think for many of the other organizations
that have taken the step forward to support that.
And then finally, you know,
we heard some remarks here from folks
that are at Granite Regional Park.
And I know some of our,
our youth that were out today,
here today already left
because they also had soccer practice later tonight
to show you how,
how this facility actually goes late into the night.
Because now that we have actually lights in there
that, by the way,
the parents cobbled together some money
with the city to actually put together,
you know, the, the importance of also maintaining
our public facilities that help youth year round.
And so on that point,
I do want to thank the vice mayor
for recognizing the need to be supporting
our city and public facilities,
because without those,
then we actually don't have the infrastructure
to support our youth too.
So glad to support the motion.
And thank you all the staff and the CBOs
for the work that they've put here today.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
And to touch on your point to city staff,
did the commission get the opportunity
to weigh in on this at all post the scoring?
No, per the charter,
it's not part of their commission duties,
power and duty.
Oh, okay.
Sounds good.
Okay.
Thank you.
All right.
Sounds good.
Council member Maple.
Thank you, madam vice mayor.
I will be brief
because I know we still have another big item before us,
which is the budget.
But I just want to,
I want to start by thanking the staff.
I know this is,
you know,
it's been,
this is the first time around.
So I just want to thank you for all your work,
for staying true to the process
and for working with everyone.
I know it hasn't been easy.
I know there's a lot of different opinions
about what should be done or not.
And I'm sure you can talk to as many people
and get as many different opinions.
And so just thank you for your work.
It doesn't go unnoticed.
I also want to thank Council Member Bang
for all of your efforts over many, many years
and with many others on this dais too,
to make this a reality.
It's first time.
I think we're going to learn a lot.
And so I really,
you know,
obviously seconded the motion,
but say I really support that the idea
of going back to our commission
as often as we can,
getting feedback from them
because that is,
that is their role.
And so with that,
also want to thank my commissioner,
Dave on,
I see you in the crowd.
Thank you for being here,
even though it's at 8 30 PM at night.
And so,
you know,
I think that there are,
there's some difficult choices here
and maybe there was no one,
you know,
one best way of doing it,
but I think scenario one
is the best way
that we should move forward now.
And I'm really looking forward
to seeing what comes out
from,
you know,
an analysis of the process
moving forward.
I also want to thank
Vice Mayor Talamontes
for thinking outside the box too.
I know that there's,
there are,
just because we have a lot
of different opinions,
myself included,
about do you have smaller CBOs,
do you not,
do you fund this fully,
do you not,
how much goes towards the city,
how much goes towards CBOs,
it's a challenge
and I think we'll learn a lot
over the years.
So thank you for being willing
to do that.
And so with that,
those are my comments.
Thank you.
Thank you so much.
Council Member Kaplan.
Thank you, Vice Mayor.
As I was with
Council Member Vang
two weeks ago,
I was ready to move forward
on scenario one
and I'll just reiterate
because I think
it does need to be said.
Thank you to staff.
This was created from nothing.
It was created from advocacy
and it was created from words.
Words don't always
equal a process
that is easily understood
that accomplishes
what we want the words
to accomplish.
So it is,
and I think we should take this
as a learning model.
I don't think anybody
was intentionally left out
in the funding process.
I ask staff a lot of questions.
Renee knows this.
I probe and I ask why.
Why this way?
Why that way?
My commissioner, Gina,
will know.
I send her a lot of questions.
Why did the commission do this?
What was the commission doing?
Did the commission do this?
Why did you think this way?
Because it is important
we as the city have said
that our commissioner
should have a voice
and should represent
the community.
And so it's also important
knowing the background
of my commissioner
and why I appointed her
that her opinion matters.
She did have a chance
to look at the brief scenario three
and got back to me
and said that doesn't mean
the intent of what we
as a commission
and what I believe
as a commission
we want to do.
So it's not only
that I think it's important
when a new proposal
is brought up
that I have an opinion,
but my commissioner
who spent all that time
working with staff
has an opinion
because they dealt
with this day in
and day out
and we gave them
that charge
to do that.
I'm in agreement
with the motion
and the second
as well as looking
at the SIP
because I have questions.
Specifically
as we look at
public other entities,
good for Sac City
for applying,
but 40% of our children
live north of the river.
Did somebody reach out
to Natomas Unified,
Robla,
or Twin Rivers
who have just as many
unhoused
and homeless children?
Why should only Sac City
get the benefit?
And don't get me wrong,
this is a gripe
I have had
in the two decades
I spent as a Natomas Unified
school board member.
Natomas gets ignored
and Sac City gets everything
because everybody forgets
about north of the river.
You know,
so is it fair
just because Sac City
is bigger
and had matching funds?
But isn't that
also the responsibility?
And this is me
having spent two decades
as a school board member.
Isn't it my job
as a school board member
when you're an elected
school board member
to take care
of your unhoused kids
that you get special
federal funding
and additional funding for?
So why are we spending
our city money
to help another
elected public body
do the job
that they should already
be doing and investing in?
That's a policy question
that I think we need
to dig into
at the SIP
because I don't believe
that creates equity.
You know,
and I'm very different.
Again, I'm a council member,
but what are our school districts
doing to fund
to help their most neediest?
And that's where I go back
to where Council Member
Guetta brought in.
Zero to five.
That could be more
of our avenue
that we look at
because those kids
generally are not in school
except for TK maybe at four.
So you look at the zero to four
and what's being done
because we know
that first five
are the most important years
when we talk about literacy
and safety and trauma
and making sure these kids
grow up and don't have
the violence and trauma
in their life
so that they can make
good decisions.
So I am very supportive
when we review the SIP
and I want
because I know
several commissioners are here.
We really got to talk.
Does, do school districts
and does the county
of Office of Education,
should they be eligible
to get some of this funding?
Because a significant amount
of funding
went to Sac City
and went to SCOE.
Great programs.
Fully supportive
of those programs.
But was that really
the intent of Measure L
when they have
a significant amount
of budget
and should be doing this
or should they be lumped
in with CBOs?
You know, like,
but that's,
that's a conversation
I think needs to be had
with SIPs
as we look at that
because I will tell you
while I am supportive
of scenario one,
I do have a heartburn.
Not because I don't support
what, what Sex City
and SCOE is doing,
but that's,
we're taking our money
that we should be doing
for Sex City kids
and for the time
they're not in school.
I really believe
if we're to make the maximum
we've got to look at the time
they're not in school
and fund that.
It is an alignment
when we fund the SIP
to make sure we have
emerging and grassroots.
And I will go back
and say this
because I specifically asked
my, my commissioner.
The city did do a great job
in outreach
and they did do
a good job offering
small and those
who did not have
permanent grant writers
to know how to fill out
the application.
So any suggestion
otherwise to say
it was racist
or that the application
was meant to keep people out
is a flat out lie
and it's disrespectful
to our city staff
for the work that they did
to accuse them of that
because they're all small,
there are small
and emerging CBOs
who did get funding
that attended
these presentations
that learned
how to fill out
these applications
and make it happen.
So, thank you staff.
I'll get off my high horse
and you need to get on
with the budget.
Thank you for everybody
with that you've done.
I am in support
of scenario one
and I really am looking forward
to the data
that we get
and how we fund this
and what happens for it.
Thank you.
Council Member Dickinson.
Thanks, Mayor.
I want to give some credit
here to Council Member
Telemontes
who I worked with
to look at
an alternative approach.
Now, I want to take a step
back here
and I want to add my thanks
to the staff,
the commission members,
all the members
of the community
that participate
in this process.
But we all have to recognize
the hard reality.
We don't have as much money
as we would like to have
to do all the things
we need to do.
That is the fact of life.
And so we have to try
to allocate the resources
that we do have available
in the way and manner
that we think
is going to achieve
the greatest positive outcomes
for the most people
in the city,
as children and families
in the city.
And so recognizing
that very disdainful,
if you want to look at it,
the right reality,
Council Member Telemontes
tried to come up
with something
that expanded the reach
and gave more
of a mental health focus
as it turned out.
That's one of,
do you focus your money
in one place?
Do you focus your money
on one subject?
Do you focus your money
on one particular pursuit?
These are all questions
for us.
So I do think
that providing
that alternative
deserves at least
the credit
of having done that work
and stimulated
the kind of discussion
we've had
for the last 10
or 15 minutes.
For my part,
I can count
so I understand
what the outcome
on this motion
is going to be.
And that's fine.
It would be fine
if it was scenario three.
You know,
the real questions
I think
we can't really grapple
with effectively here.
They will be subject
and they have been
to comment
and postmortems
and then an adjustment
of the process
for the next round
as they must
and should be.
So what we have to do
is try to figure out
the best approach
we have before us
with the money
that we've got.
A majority clearly
thinks that's
alternative one
or scenario one.
And I don't criticize that.
I think there are
some different ideas
that could have
been productive
as well.
but fundamentally
I think we have
to recognize
that whatever we do
there's going to be
a lot of good work done.
There's going to be
a lot accomplished
in our communities
but we're not going
to be able
to help those
all those
that we would like
to do all the good things
that they can do too.
And so by definition
we will only be
partially successful.
The success is important
but the challenge
of reaching success
with the remainder
that are not going
to be able
to enjoy funding
and support
from the city
reaching success
for them
has to be
our remaining goal.
and I'm confident
I'm confident
given the work
that the staff
and the commission
and the community
has done
in participating
in what we have
before us tonight
will be as robust
and as dedicated
to making sure
that we're asking
and answering
the questions
that we have
seen raised
here
and that will be raised
following what we do
here tonight
so that we do
make improvements
and adjustments
as needed
and necessary
for the next round.
I came this evening
I'm prepared
to support
my colleagues
alternative
which we did work on
but I think
that it's important
that we hopefully
speak with one voice
on this
so I will
I'll support
the motion.
Okay
and I'm also happy
to support scenario one
and I just want to say
like throughout scenario
this new scenario
to show like
what's possible
when you decide
whether you do
30, 40, 50, 60,
80% of what people
apply for
and I think that
we all just learned
a lot of lessons here
on this first process
and you know
taking it back
to the commission
to really just
correct some areas
and you know
some areas of improvement
really focus in
on how we want
to do these grants
and which areas
we want to focus on
I think it's going
to be incredibly helpful
so I'm happy
to support
scenario one.
Yeah sorry
mayor and council
I made a grave error
and I forgot
to thank my
measure L commissioner
Lillian Ghaffari
and her
she came here
with her deputy
commissioner
eight month year old
Cyrus here tonight
so thank you so much
commish for that
and coming here
with your staff support
as well
so thank you mayor
yes
well thank you
we have a motion
a second
I just want to note
that this is our first shot
so we'll be back
three years from now
and I'm sure
we'll make some adjustments
whether or not
I think that
the notion's a good one
council member
Talamante's
vice mayor
I'd rather pick more
winners than losers
overall we all would
whether or not
we want to focus
more of a split
on different
areas and issue areas
or more than
nonprofits
and less on government
agencies
I think we'll take a look
at this first three years
and go from there
but the big picture
as I said three weeks ago
is Roger
you know
you started this idea
17 years ago
and
and crashed and burned
a few times
but here we are now
the fruits of that labor
and we talked earlier
about youth violence
we talked
I know Councilman Vang
has been on us
over and over
about not
jeopardizing
and
and eliminating
lowering funding
for our youth
and you'll see
in the budget
a little bit
we're not
cutting any
programs for our youth
but with this
we're I think
doing the math
roughly doubling
the services
that we're providing
and programs
for our young people
our future
so we should all
be excited about that
with that
we have a motion
and a second
correct
all those in favor
please say aye
aye
any nos or abstentions
hearing none
item
passes
congratulations
thank you guys
okay
next item
city budget
all right
good evening
mayor
council members
members of the public
I'm Pete Coletto
the city's
finance director
and I'm happy
to present to you
tonight
budget
for adoption
so before I start
what I promise
is a very brief
presentation
I just want to
express my thanks
and gratitude
first and foremost
to Murthala
and the budget team
who've really been
working tirelessly
developing the budget
and providing information
to mayor council
the city manager
and the assistant city
managers for their
leadership
to the department heads
and their staff
for their partnership
and to the public
for providing their input
building a budget
is really a team effort
and that's especially
true when we're making
really difficult decisions
as a city
so as I mentioned
your council
has been through
its budget deliberations
what we're presenting
today
is really going
to focus
on the adjustments
that reflect
the consensus
of council
and provide
a balanced budget
so first
I want to start
with the budget
restorations
again this reflects
really the consensus
that we heard
on May 20th
and that went
to budget
and audit committee
so we will
have the small
business relief option
for the fire
prevention fees
lowering the fee
increase for small
businesses
and we will
be restoring
the position
in the office
of diversity
and equity
we will not
be charging
for residential
parking permits
and as the mayor
mentioned
the youth violence
prevention contracts
are restored
so I also want
to mention
here
so there were
some concerns
around senior
fee increases
so we are only
going to increase
the fee
for non-residents
so city of
Sacramento
residents
participating
in those senior
programs
will not see
a fee increase
the other
thing I want
to highlight
here
as you know
we eliminated
a number
of filled
positions
to balance
the budget
but as of now
I am very happy
to report
that no city
employees
in those positions
right now
will need
to be laid off
so the city
manager directed
and HR
and the department
worked to find
other vacancies
to place
those employees
so those
three million dollars
of restorations
need to be funded
and so here
is our plan
of funding
so utilizing
a small portion
of the federal
funding reserve
the measure L
funding that you
just approved
for the library
which freed up
general fund
a reflection
in the budget
of current
city attorney
staffing levels
this will revert
to the higher
level classifications
in fiscal year
27
so it's a one
time solution
the use of
some projected
fund balance
and then the
elimination
of vacant
positions
in the city
attorney's office
the clerk's
office
and the treasurer's
office
we also had
a number
of technical
adjustments
these are minor
adjustments
that occurred
too late
to get into
the proposed
budget
so we are
shifting the
emergency management
department
from the city
manager's office
to the fire
department
there are a number
of position
ad deletes
there's the
action of
the compensation
commission
there are some
labor and other
offset adjustments
and then we
can utilize some
fund shifts
to maintain
our median
or road median
mowing service
levels
so where does
that bring us
on our forecast
well we are
balanced for
fiscal year
25-26
but again we
still have this
structural
deficit
and so we are
projecting deficits
in the out years
one important
thing to note
for fiscal
27
is this
projection
does not
include
state
homelessness
funding
through the
HAP
program
so the
governor
and just
to provide
an update
on that
at the state
level
I have some
good news
and bad news
the good news
is the legislature
has included
it in their
package
that they're
going to bring
to the governor
to negotiate
the bad news
is they are
including roughly
half of the
funding that was
in the last
round of HAP
so we are
hopeful that we
will get some
HAP funding
but it will
most likely be
less because
that half
billion that the
legislature is
putting in
is going to
be the ceiling
so there were
a couple of
other items
that we discussed
at budget and
audit committee
as we prepare
for future year
budgets
so we will be
coming back
in the fall
with these two
items they also
reflect concerns
that we heard
at council
the first is
a vacancy
analysis so
we'll have
departments provide
an analysis
of the impact
of eliminating
every vacancy
older than a
certain amount
of time
and we'll
have a really
in-depth
session about
that at budget
and audit
and then we'll
also be discussing
potential policies
to bring to
council around
balancing further
out than the
budget year
either balancing
or within a
tolerance but
we'll have those
discussions in
advance any
policies if
appropriate
so as you're
considering the
budget and the
long-term financial
status of the
city there are
some pending
factors that
we've discussed
throughout this
process
first is the
economic
uncertainty and
risk of
recession we
don't know
when one may
happen but
obviously that
would adversely
impact our
finances there
are very real
threats to our
federal funding
it's something
we'll continue
to monitor
and update
council about
there's the
future of the
HAP program
which I was
just talking
about as of
now the
governor has
zero dollars
in the HAP
program the
legislature is
proposing a
significant reduction
and we don't know
what will happen in
future years even if
they are able to work
out a deal this year
and then we've
discussed the
long-term
liabilities that the
city has in its
pension and deferred
maintenance but I'd
really be remiss to
end on a negative
note because there
are a lot of
positives in this
budget so while we
still have a
structural deficit
we've made real
progress back in
February that 60
million dollar
deficit for fiscal
year 27 that was
100 million so
that reduction is
really due to the
ongoing balancing
strategies contained in
this budget and as
council adopts in
future years more
ongoing strategies
will will make our
budget position
stronger the budget
advances a number of
council priorities
it maintains
homelessness
services funding
for our shelter
beds and other
services includes a
transportation safety
team so this is
those quick builds
to make our roads
safer we have a
number of
infrastructure and
facility improvements
including the badly
needed renovations in
the north sack and
south sack libraries
so while we made a
lot of difficult
decisions there are a
lot of critical
services being funded
for our community and
while we have unfunded
liabilities council
adopted policies earlier
this year for when we
do have one-time
savings to start
creating funding
mechanisms to pay
those down and
over time that will
improve the city's
financial position so
staff is recommending
that council conduct a
public hearing and
adopt a final budget and
capital improvement
program and we are happy
to take any questions
so mayor i have 35 speakers did
you want to take those now
yes please thank you i'm
going to call quite a few so
that we can line up in the
aisle daryl roberts
cal yi tau sandra vang paul
andrews keon bliss michael barnbom
mayor city manager daryl roberts
andrews keon
andrews keon
andrews keon
andrews keon
thank you heожет up to the
first trade
day
again
grant
jyst
m started
andrews keon
andrews mister
icheon
104
oh my god
m worried i may
what are you��
andrews keon
in our schools mayor
of the general fund budget for youth investment.
We did this with the recognition that our city needed to rethink its commitment
to investing in our youth.
Part of the challenge with the flip of putting Measure L before the budget,
many of the leaders who really need to hear this have left.
And many of our young leaders and our youth development specialists
really need to understand the budget is where we really have to begin focusing on.
Today I repeat that call that we as a city and you as a council,
you as council members, you must courageously find ways
to increase the investment in youth needed for us
to truly become a world-class citizen.
I said before I was cut off, 25 vacant police positions
would add probably about $4.5 million.
to the violent prevention funding line.
Prevention and intervention strategies are a part of public safety.
We must think that way for things to permanently change.
You're in a seat to rethink and redirect thinking.
We encourage you to use this opportunity.
I encourage you to use this opportunity and in future budget years
to think about different approaches than looking to measure L
to answer all of our challenges.
Thank you.
Thank you.
If you have comments,
Kao Yi Tao.
Kao Yi Tao.
I'm not seeing movement.
Sandra Vang.
Paul Andrews.
Following Paul is Keon Bliss,
Michael Barnbaum.
Have you seen the violence that's happening in Los Angeles?
You probably looked at it with angst.
You probably thought,
how could that happen?
I can tell you how.
People like you leaning on their cowardice.
People like you leaning into the narrative spun by a police union
that will threaten you as being against law and order
if you don't increase an already bloated budget.
And rather than having the courage to push back against that narrative,
rather than having the courage to fund community programs
that stop crime before it ever is a glint in someone's eyes
as something they need to do in order to survive,
rather than push back your own narrative of restoration,
of humanity and empathy,
you go along with the status quo.
What's happening in LA is the status quo,
with ever-increasing police budgets nationwide.
Every single police officer in here
and numerous pearl-clutching people in the community
with good and bad intentions will lean into the fear tactic,
the fear tactic that started with white flight from the inner city
and continues today,
continues to drive irrational fear
rather than lean into an alternative narrative
that doesn't accept police union talking points as gospel.
The city adopted a resolution in 2019
that stated that public safety includes more than just police.
It includes preventative measures,
measures to interrupt violence,
measures to address the needs of disenfranchised people
before they become desperate.
And then council proceeded to give the police raises
in the interviewing years,
totaling $100 million.
What that tells me is that this body
does not believe in crime prevention,
only in creating more victims on both sides of the law,
those driven to crime for survival
and those on the receiving end of crimes
that they are victims of
and that didn't have to happen.
Fund community over incarceration
and not just the safe communities that have your ear,
but also the ones where people are working so much
that they don't have the time to yell at you.
The last thing we need to do
is save money for vacancies as communities suffer.
Thank you for your comments.
Leon Bliss and Michael Barnbaum.
Budgets are a reflection of our values
and priorities as a community.
And one of the biggest priorities that we all share
is to build a safer, healthier community
and meet the needs of all Sacramento residents
so that everyone may thrive.
Communities are safest when people have
what they need to live, not just survive.
That means consistent access to food,
clean air, land water, stable housings,
health care, education, and dignity.
When those needs go unmet,
we are pushed to the margins,
forced to make impossible choices.
That's not a crisis of morality.
That's a crisis of policy.
Police have never delivered on safety
because their best work comes after the harm is already done.
And year after year,
the Sacramento Police Department
bleeds taxpayer dollars through lawsuit settlements
and bloated overtime
under the guise of public safety
while leaving our communities
with less transparency, less trust,
and less actual safety.
Even as every department across the city
is being asked to make painful cuts
to programs and services.
How did we get here?
Why are a majority of you too afraid
to even touch the police department budget?
The simple answer is follow the money.
Since 2014,
the Sacramento Police Officers Association
has funneled over $90,000
in campaign contributions
to seven out of nine council members here.
How much has Moa paid each of you for tonight's vote?
$6,800 each
for Council Member Dickinson,
Council Member Pluckybomb,
and Council Member Guerra.
Over $8,000
for Council Member Kaplan.
$10,950
to Council Member Jennings.
And $13,000
to Council Member Talamantes.
And congrats, Mayor McCarty.
You are the Blue Ribbon winner.
You've received a whopping
$38,000
since October.
That's a return on investment
exceeding $120 million
from since 2014.
You are public officials
and you have a fiduciary responsibility
to make good use of city taxpayers.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Michael Barnbaum
is our next speaker.
Keon Bliss,
you've exceeded your speaking time.
Please stop speaking
and take your seat.
If you continue to make comments,
you're disrupting
the orderly conduct of the meeting.
You're now in violation
of Chapter 5
of the City Council's
procedure.
If you do not stop,
you'll be ordered
to leave the meeting.
Please take your seat.
Michael Barnbaum.
Thank you.
Honorable Mayor,
members of the Council,
Michael Barnbaum
rising in opposition
to the 25-26 city budget.
It does not provide
enough resources
and investment
to youth,
community centers,
and violence prevention programs.
When we invest in our youth,
we invest in safer communities
because when we invest in youth,
more is possible for them
to get opportunities
they otherwise
wouldn't have been able to get.
Nobody wants to get up
and see a fight
or some act of violence
that is not good local news
that matters.
We will be getting answers
if that is what we see.
We're going to be making phone calls
to 10 on your side
and capturing that
on late news tonight.
It is not what people want to see
where the news comes first
and it begins with breaking news.
So now I want to hear
from the community
on this topic,
very important to the city budget.
I want to hear your testimony
and your phone calls coming in.
339-1140,
1-800-920-1140,
Saptown Sports 1140.
And more of that testimony
is next.
Next speaker is Kaylee Tran,
then Ja'ash Raulzol,
Mario Guerrero,
D'Angelo Mack.
I don't see Kaylee.
Is Ja'ash here?
No.
No.
Mario?
No.
D'Angelo Mack?
Following D'Angelo
is Rashid Sadiq,
then Stacy Anderson,
then Flo Kofar.
D'Angelo Mack, resident.
Today, you all passed
two unanimous votes
for a pathway to move
for a new stadium.
I'm of the belief
that we will see
faster response
for this
than passing
a resolution
for safety.
Five years ago,
we passed
a public safety resolution
that redefined
what we consider safety.
It was unanimous
as well, right?
The thought was
that we would begin
to really include
community
in the process, right?
The people
who are closest
to the problem
are also closest
to the solution.
But we do understand
what speaks.
The reason why
the resolution
for the stadium
will get more response
is because
you value that more.
You value that
because you value dollars.
You heard
Brother Keon
talk about
how much you've gotten
from those
different entities.
We know that
there is money
in a place
called police budget.
There are vacancies
sitting there
while people
are dying.
You got answers
in the audience
begging you
to give them
the funds
to support
the community
they know
and the community
that trusts them.
And yet,
you are sitting
on your hands
for vacancies.
right?
I believe
I'm here to remind
you of who you are.
You're the people's champion.
Do it for the people.
Do it for the people.
Rashid?
Is Rashid still here?
Stacey Anderson
and Flo Kofar.
Rashid Sadiq
with Lift Up Love
Always.
And I want to say
that a little louder.
Lift Up Love
Always.
And we've been
talking about the budget,
talking about police.
When is it time
that we talk about
what's really needed
and it's care
for our communities,
for our kids,
put the money
into the programs,
into the communities?
Mayor,
Kevin McCarty,
I've known you
for a long time.
We've been in the battlefields
around a lot of things.
Police reform.
Now we're talking
about police budgets.
Be bold, brother.
Be bold.
That's all we're asking.
We're asking you
to be bold,
not to put people
out of work,
but to use unused dollars
that's been rotating
for five years.
For five years.
If they would have used it,
they would have used it
five years ago.
Come on.
We're laying people off.
We got 56 parks and rec folks
that's laid off
because you guys
don't want to use
unused dollars.
And every year,
they run up the budget.
They have folks
who are beat cops
who are making money
like Chief Lester.
Come on.
Where's the policies?
Where's the accountability?
There would be
no business run like that.
Nobody gets to do that.
holds his cash dollars
during a time like this.
And you're still paying
Howard Chan $400,000.
Come on.
It's mixed management.
It is not a deficit
that can't be handled.
Do bold things.
Make good decisions.
Take care of our kids.
Come on, Kevin.
Come on, brother.
Come on.
Prove me wrong.
Prove me wrong.
I voted for somebody else.
Prove me wrong.
Come on.
Thank you.
Here's Stacy Anderson.
Good evening.
I'm Stacy Anderson.
I'm speaking on behalf
of National African-American
Civil Rights Organization
known as NACRO.
So let me remind you,
when you invest your money,
where you invest your money
is where you invest your values.
If our youth are underfunded,
then our priorities are misplaced.
Sacramento's budget
is a declaration of its priorities.
If youth,
especially our marginalized youth,
are absent,
then the city is failing
to invest in their future.
Public safety is not just policing.
It is prevention,
opportunity,
engagement,
and empowerment.
Yet,
while millions remain allocated
to vacant police positions,
our youth programs,
parks,
and violence prevention initiatives
struggle for funding.
Sacramento's budget
must reflect
a true commitment
to its future,
not just in words,
but in dollars.
Our youth deserve more than scraps.
They deserve investment
in career pathways,
leadership development,
entrepreneurship,
mental health,
sustainability,
and access to parks,
recreation centers,
and the arts.
These spaces are not luxuries.
They are lifelines
that provide young people
with safe environments,
creative expression,
and community connection.
When we fund youth,
we create a city that thrives,
a city that plants the seed,
lets them lead,
and ensures they succeed.
Our young people
are not an afterthought.
They are the leaders of tomorrow,
and Sacramento must fund
their success today.
If we want a safer,
stronger,
and more visionary community,
then we must demand a budget
that reflects that promise.
Will Sacramento invest
in its future,
or will it continue
neglecting the voices
that need it most?
Let tonight be the turning point.
Invest in our youth.
Empower our future.
Fund the spaces
that shape them.
A safe community
is an empowered community.
It's in your hands.
The time for action is now.
I'm here.
I'm not here to be here.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Our next speaker is Flo Kofor,
then Leah Schenk,
then Karen Kay.
Thank you.
Good evening.
I'm going to ask for the courtesy
of your undivided attention,
something I noticed
that not all of the speakers
were afforded this evening,
and something that should be
the minimum since we were given
two minutes to appear before you.
Tonight, I want to appeal
to your humanity.
I know most of your backstories.
Almost all of you grew up poor.
Four of you grew up
with immigrant parents.
Three of you either experienced
domestic violence
or homelessness.
And all of you were once kids.
Kids who thousands of people
invested in
to get you exactly
where you are today,
on this dais,
to represent
the people of Sacramento.
There are half a million people
in this city
who are counting on you
to take their money
and invest it in places
that are going to make them safe.
For the last six weeks,
I've had the privilege
of working at New Tech
Early College High School.
And I had 28 students,
28 black students
that I was specifically working with.
And I wanted to make sure
that all of them
had summer enrichment programs.
And you know what I discovered?
Something that shouldn't be
a surprise to any of us,
but that the majority
of the programs
that are available
cost at least $1,000 a week,
or they simply don't exist
once you turn 14.
Because we focus on the kids
who can't stay home by themselves,
but once we think you're okay,
we just sent thousands
of kids home
who have nothing to do
until school resumes in August.
Our budget should be invested in that.
Council Member Kaplan,
you're absolutely right.
We are not SCOE,
but we are the city of Sacramento.
And when I look around
and when I attend
an Oak Park Neighborhood Association
meeting on Thursday,
and I hear that we're working on
trying to crack down on sideshows,
and that the majority
of the people participating
in them are kids,
I think to myself,
yeah, because we've given them
nothing to do.
This budget is morally wrong.
Those vacancies should be cut,
and you all know exactly
what to do,
and I'm calling on you tonight
to do the right thing.
Invest in Sacramento.
Thank you.
Comments?
Thank you.
Thank you.
Leah Shank.
I don't see Leah.
Karen Kay.
And then Stephanie Duncan.
Leah Shank with Impact.
I didn't want to put some things
in perspective for you all,
because I think there's a lot
of things that are missed
in this conversation.
But I think you underestimate
us as organizers
and as CBOs.
I think that you guys
have a blanket identification marker
that you classify us under,
and you don't realize
the work that we really do.
We get the calls
that you never get.
We get the calls
that don't go to the police
because there's a distrust
with the police.
We get the calls
where families don't have any food.
They don't have housing.
Their children are not home,
and they don't know where they are.
Or we get the calls
where a youngster has a weapon
or a weapon is turned against him
and he doesn't know what to do.
We also get the calls
where we are at the yellow tape
where the body's on the ground.
And we have a weeping mother,
sometimes father,
that are there trying to figure out
if that is their child or not.
And then we have to stand there
when they find out
that it is their child,
and they fall to their knees
or fall to the ground,
and we have to see them weeping
time after time after time.
And that's who we are.
That's the service that we provide.
We're providing a service.
We're providing a service
that none of you want to do.
And so I hear you guys
talk about a lot of numbers.
I hear you guys
talking about this budget.
I see you fiddling around
with paperwork.
And at the end of the day,
we are going to lose more lives.
That's just the reality
because that's what's happening
is that we're losing lives.
Children are dying
on the streets of Sacramento
because nobody is centering them
in the conversation.
I've heard nobody talk about
the youth other than Mai Vang.
So I want to put a name to that
because Julius Cheney
should be here today.
He's a 15-year-old child
that had a whole life ahead of him.
And he should be here.
Okay?
I heard his mom say to me
that she feels like he was failed
and that all her son was
was a dollar bill.
And that's true.
We all failed him
with the help of you guys
because you won't empower us
or give us the tools
and the resources
to do what we need to do
for our community
that we know,
that we see,
that we work with all the time.
I have a 15-year-old son at home.
He's a Julius Cheney
and he deserves to live too.
A long life.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Our next speaker is Karen Kaye.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Please take your seat.
Your time is complete.
Karen Kaye.
Following Karen is Stephanie Duncan,
Dan Tibbetts,
Brooke Miller Jacobs.
Good evening, Mayor and Council.
I've been here before.
You've heard me say this before,
but I think it's important
to say it again.
The majority of Sacramento residents
want a well-funded,
well-trained,
and well-equipped police department.
One that's backed
by their city leaders.
It's time to end the reckless rhetoric
about defunding the police.
That approach has failed.
Just look at cities like Minneapolis,
Portland, Seattle,
Austin, Baltimore,
to just name a few.
Money was diverted
from the police department
in these cities,
and crime surged,
and those same cities
came back begging
to restore funding.
Let's not go down the same path.
You cannot demand law and order
while undermining
the very people who provided.
Our police officers continue
to show up,
protecting and serving the city,
despite the lack of support
from some of you.
And then you wonder
why recruitment is down.
Maybe it's because
of how some of you
treat the ones
that are still here.
And unless you're willing
to do the training,
wear the badge,
risk your life,
and possibly not make it home,
refrain from criticizing
those who do.
Be grateful for their service.
Support those
who keep us safe.
Thank you very much.
Thank you for your comments.
Stephanie Duncan.
Stephanie, then Dan, then Brooke.
Good evening, Mayor and Council.
My name is Stephanie Duncan,
and I'm a renter in District 7.
I just want to reiterate
what I said a couple of weeks ago,
that the priorities of every city
should be to maintain
essential services.
This is picking up trash
to keep the city clean,
having clean water
and sewer services,
maintaining our roads,
and most importantly,
keeping the community safe
by funding our police and fire.
Without these essential services,
the city ceases
to function properly.
I hear over and over
people talking about
there's these vacant positions,
money for vacant positions
that is unused,
that is not accurate.
That money is used
for overtime.
Our police department
is understaffed.
That money is used
to provide overtime
for the needed staffing
of officers
that we need on the streets.
Without that overtime,
we would have even less officers
than the 641 that we have.
Just like if I went to work
and no one was there
to do my job,
someone would have
to pick up the slack.
These officers
are picking up the slack.
I also hear over and over
how the police
has the largest budget ever.
Absolutely they do,
but do people understand
what's in that budget?
It includes money
for pensions.
It includes equipment
upgrades and replacements.
It includes cost
of living adjustments.
It includes so many
other elements
that people do not
consider at all.
It's not just going
to active officer salaries.
So I please ask,
ask the city council
and mayor to continue
to support the police department
because they are understaffed,
underfunded,
and underappreciated.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Dan Tibbetts,
Brooke Miller Jacobs,
Skyler Henry.
I do want to remind
members of the audience,
please do not shout out
from the audience.
Good evening.
My name is Dan Tibbetts.
The city of Sacramento
has a major crime issue.
A reason for this is
we don't have
an appropriately staffed
police department
proportional with
our population density.
Currently,
there are approximately
90 vacancies
within the police department.
The budget for these vacancies
is currently being used
for paying overtime
for the current officers.
The law-abiding citizens
of Sacramento
greatly appreciate
the hard work
and dedication
of our police officers
currently protecting us.
However,
massive overtime
is not sustainable.
What is needed
is to hire people
to fill the vacancies
within the police department.
This would avoid
burning out
the officers
already on staff.
However,
with the proposal
to defund
a portion of the budget
for these vacancies,
overtime
versus filling vacancies
could have been
a moot point.
We law-abiding citizens
do appreciate
the strong desire
of most of the council members
to support law enforcement
with a minimal cut
in positions.
And we encourage you
to adopt
the current proposed budget
regarding our police department
without any further cuts.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Brooke Miller Jacobs
and Skyler Henry.
Sorry,
it was me first.
Please proceed.
Hi, everyone again.
So,
for me,
women lie,
men lie,
but numbers don't lie.
So,
every time we come here,
we fight for Measure U,
Measure L,
Congress equity.
We used our black community,
our black youth.
But the percentage
of when you see how much
the Measure U money,
the budget,
racial equity,
I don't know
whatever happened to that too.
We need to have
a specific separate fund
for our black kids.
Our black kids
are dying every day.
Nobody's doing
something about it.
Everyone fight for Measure U,
what is the money?
Even Shawna
could not even qualify.
And then you're telling me
that's not systemic racism?
It is.
The way they put the grant,
how you qualify,
it is absolutely racism.
Go and look at it,
how you qualify.
That's why we need
to have a separate
racial equity.
What is it?
Even in Measure U,
we need to have
a separate racial equity
specifically for our black youth.
What is it?
Do you see it?
I hang out with all the
black leaders here
in Sacramento.
They don't get nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Zero.
Nothing.
Zero.
That's why our kids
are dying
and they're suffering
from lack of nutrition,
for lack of housing,
lack of education.
But the money
is invested
in every other community
but in our black community.
And that is not,
I'm not lying.
Show me the numbers.
Show me the numbers.
How many percentage
of the budget
comes to in our community?
I'll be surprised
even if it's 1 or 2%.
So if you don't
specifically
use the fund
to invest
in our community,
you use grant writers,
they get paid
and they write
some good grants
and you give them
the fund
but it's not coming
to our community.
So we need our racial equity
as soon as possible
for everybody.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Brooke Miller Jacobs.
Welcome to my neighborhood.
I'm in District 4.
Why do we think
this is acceptable?
Because it's completely unacceptable
in my neighborhood
and in the city of Sacramento.
Why?
Why would we think
about cutting
the police department
when this is happening?
I don't know
how many people
in this room
get down on their stomach
on a regular basis
calling 911
because their house
gets hit by a bullet.
Unacceptable.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you for your comments.
Skylar Henry,
Alicia Jaffe,
Kenneth Duncan,
and then Lambert.
Hey, nice to see
everybody again
or most of you again.
So I'm not going to
try and appeal to you
or try and convince you
to do anything
because I have been
at enough of these
to know that
like how cynical
this process
almost always is.
So what I do want to do
is kind of back up
what Kian was saying.
It's not that it's surprising
that everybody takes money
from the police
and then we make our decisions
based on what the police
are asking for
but it is surprising
that it happens
for so cheap.
Like I won't go in,
I won't go into
IEs and all of that
because that's a whole
murky thing
and I,
you know,
whatever
but like just in
direct contributions
from the police association
it's less than
$70,000
for all of you up here
to just give them
whatever they want
whenever they ask for it.
The return on investment
has been like what?
Like,
I mean,
let's put that in
like in the last five years
or something
let's just multiply it
by five.
$350,000
gets you $100 million
over the course
of five years
or something like that.
Like,
I don't know.
It's,
that's the part that's wild
is that it's not even,
it's not even that
they can pay,
you know,
that you get paid
to like consider
their opinions
above everybody else's.
It's that it's so little
and it's such a bummer
because we just spent
so many hours
hearing from children's groups
who we're picking
and choosing
who we can pay
and what we can do
and like giving them
this little tiny
little piece of it
and it's because
kids don't have
an association
where they can come in
and pay your,
pay into your campaigns.
So,
I don't know.
I guess
that's it.
I had a whole bunch
of stuff to say
but I mean,
it just,
it's,
people do deserve
to feel safe
in their neighborhoods
and I don't think
anybody disagrees
with that.
But to really achieve
that,
you're hearing people,
the cops have more money
than ever
and people are still,
you know,
playing Fallujah
off of their,
off of their cell phones.
It doesn't,
it's going to take courage,
it's going to take imagination.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Our next speaker is
Alicia Yaffe,
then Kenneth Duncan.
Hi,
Mayor and Council Members.
My name is Alicia Yaffe.
I'm a member,
or a resident
of District 4.
I first would like
to speak to,
you know,
a lot of the folks
in the room
who are in support
of the police.
I understand that
we all want to feel safe
in our homes
and where we live.
I also live in District 4.
However,
police don't prevent crime.
Police respond to crime.
Right?
I have a master's degree
in conflict analysis
and resolution
from George Mason University.
I studied white supremacy
and racism
in the United States.
My understanding
is that
continuing to support
police departments
in their current existence
is supporting
the existence
of white supremacy
and it is moving
those issues forward.
The police department
here in Sacramento
has received
a $116 million
increase in budget
since 2019.
That,
all of these people
who are experiencing crime
previously
and right now,
that's happened
after that increase
in the budget.
We need to look
at different solutions.
Solutions that
help prevent violence
among youth.
Solutions that get
families fed
so they're not worried
about where their next meal
is coming from.
Solutions that actually
serve the unhoused
population here
that aren't a 3-1-1 call
that just gets
those people swept
which is inhumane.
It gets their stuff
stolen from them
and they're unable
to get those things back.
This is inhumane.
It's not fair
and it is not what I,
as a person who moved
to Sacramento
a little over a year ago
from the East Coast
want to see out of my city.
I'm a new resident
of Sacramento.
I'm one of those people
that moved to California
when other people
are leaving.
Please consider my voice
as a new resident
and as someone
who knows some things
about policing,
recidivism,
and white supremacy.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Kenneth.
Kenneth,
then Lambert,
then Mack Worthy,
then Veronica G.
Hello.
Kenneth Duncan,
founder, CEO
of Ball Out Academy.
I bring my daughters.
Luckily,
they don't have school tomorrow
and they're hanging out
but I don't want the wool
to be pulled over their eyes
when they're in their teens
or in their 20s
trying to advocate
for their community
because they're seeing it.
My daughter just said,
Daddy,
are they even paying attention?
And she's a child.
So,
and that was just something
that my baby witnessed.
And to District 4,
we're in there, man.
I'm in there daily
working with the community,
working with the children
and our kids are getting
shot left and right.
Just like the lady said,
she got bullets
hit in her house
but we're trying
to do more prevention.
I'm only there twice a week
and I believe
I'm one of the only
grassroots organizations
in there working
boots on the ground.
I know we have food literacy
and street soccer
but they're not
in CV Circle.
I'm in CV Circle.
Mr. Roberts is in CV Circle
and we've been there
and we just want our kids
to have an opportunity
and they don't.
They're getting written off
as gang members
just as trouble
and then we're putting money
into the police
and the police
who come to our community
don't even know our community.
I got pulled over
by 10 cops
after a program I ran.
Me.
I had to pull my cards out
and call Phil in the office
and let them know
I was stereotyped.
I was profiled
and my babies were with me.
And that's me
so I can only imagine
a 25-year-old young man
with dreadlocks
who's 6'4".
He might have got killed
that night.
But it was me.
Luckily I was able
to pull out my card
and talk the talk
and say the people I know
and drop some names.
But not everybody
has that opportunity
or has been
in the community
like that
and I just don't wish
that on my brothers
and sisters
in the community.
We're not only
in CB Circle.
I'm at 14 schools
in Sac City Unified.
So a lot of...
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Thank you for your comments.
Next speaker is Lambert.
Lambert and Mack Worthy.
Clerk,
I'd like to make a motion
to extend this meeting
past 9.30 p.m.
Thank you, Vice Mayor.
Do we have a second?
Second.
Thank you.
All in favor?
Aye.
Opposed?
Thank you.
Passes.
Lambert?
You know,
I've been coming here
for a long time.
I've told you
that I come to City Hall
to study you
because I'm a native.
Rarely did I come here.
And I don't regret
coming here,
but I've seen enough,
especially when this budget
is approved
because that means
the money will be out there.
Now,
as a person
who has run
his own business
from the ground up,
I've never heard
of structural deficit
in my life.
Structural deficit
is a term
that masks
mismanagement.
That's what you have here.
You also have
dereliction of duty
on display.
Now,
here's Laney Milstein.
It's okay for her to leave,
but where's Howard Chan?
Where's the other
city managers
that are making
six figures?
If you take that money,
if you take that money
and put it into
Amphodel Passel Heights,
I don't make any bones
about that.
That's why I mentioned
about the Grant Pacers team
that has not been
acknowledged
at all.
Here they are,
just graduated
from high school
last week.
I was there,
and they're still
talking about to me,
why didn't we have a parade?
Why didn't we get to go
do anything?
Why didn't we get
any banquets?
And I didn't say budget.
I told them
it's systemic
and institutionalized
racist practices
at City Hall,
mainly in the city
manager's department,
and I have caught them
on many occasions
sabotaging
our business,
and we're still
going to succeed
without it.
Thank you for your comments.
I have 10 more speakers.
The next is Mac Worthy,
then Veronica Gee,
Allegra Taylor,
David Gonzalez,
Guy Renfro.
People,
when people
are here
that
caused
this
corruption,
they're still
making decisions.
How do you
have that
to happen?
When you knew
Melstine
is part
of your corruption,
power chain,
they should be
in jail.
You cannot
get over that
and say,
we're going to
build a city,
all this stuff,
we're going to
be a big time city.
This is where
your problem is.
You cannot
drive a car
with two flat ties,
and that's what
you're trying to do.
All that
at the end
of the day,
what about now?
you knew
she was here
all the time.
But yet still,
you put up that,
oh,
where is the
manager report?
Nowhere.
Nowhere.
But yet still,
here is a corruption
making decisions,
and you letting it go by.
And none of you
still worked.
But yet still,
you telling the people
that we're going to
do this and we're going,
you ain't going to
do a damn thing
but keep corrupting
this city.
That's all you're
going to do.
That's all you're
going to do.
It's not just
the police department.
It's here.
Roger,
you got a problem.
It's amazing
to see.
We know when
it was a blackmail
and for city council.
A trick stayed.
A liar stayed.
Why?
Because he don't
say I.
And second.
And so,
these are the things
that you have to solve
in the city
before the city
moves forward.
A city cannot move
forward on grants
and bonds.
People,
it's sad to see
that this is why.
Thank you for your
comments.
Your time is complete.
Veronica G.
Then Allegra Taylor.
I don't see
Veronica.
Allegra Taylor.
Jamie
and
David
kills you.
Yeah.
David
Gonzalez.
Okay.
Guy
Renfroe.
I'm Allegra Taylor.
All right.
Nope.
You're up, Allegra.
Well, good evening, city council members, mayor.
Listen, it's a waste of our time to come here and talk to you.
I know that.
But maybe one day you guys will listen to somebody.
We stand with the children, the children that I knocked on doors with,
the children that had boots on the ground voting for Measure L.
In regards to the police monies, that fund is a fund that's sitting there that can be used now.
I was sitting in counseling today with one of our youth that's facing the case.
I got to go to court with him.
Okay.
And we're not one of those organizations that was funded, by the way.
So I'm not speaking because I'm getting paid.
In addition to that, it is very disturbing to know that all of you city council members being paid by the police
are the ones that's going to be making the decisions about the police.
Few of you city council members, as this man behind me spoke about the history of Sacramento and his 40 years,
and that piece of paper that you guys didn't allow him to put on the screen,
it talked about what he was asking for and what was going on here in Sacramento in 1981.
That's 40 years ago.
The same things on his sheet is the same things we're talking to you all about today.
The same thing.
You know, it's a challenge when we see the click with any city council.
When we see the city council members clicked up and doing stuff with the mayor and stuff like that.
Some of you are corrupt.
I'm going to agree with them.
I've got some of you on tape showing your corruptness in the city of Sacramento.
You know, it's a shame when you go against the people that's volunteering and spending their time unpaid serving your city.
It's a shame when city council members put a stop to volunteers volunteering in places like, let's say, State Fair, Cal Expo, Art and Fair Mall.
Yeah, State Fair, Cal Expo.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Guy Renfro.
Is Guy here?
No.
Mo Kashmiri.
Following Mo is Moyes.
Hello, Mo Kashmiri, resident of District 4.
I agree with the speakers that we need to be voting down this current budget proposal and adding more money for prevention and youth services.
You've heard that quite a few times, but I also haven't heard reference that we need to be looking at directing the city to look at additional revenue sources, such as soda taxes,
and getting rid of our regressive business taxes to make them more progressive.
Those are ways to get in more money so we can get more of what we need, and ultimately, real public safety means we need prevention.
We need communities that have the resources they need to succeed, and it's up to you all to do that, so we're looking at you to do the right thing,
invest more money for youth services and prevention.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Moyes, then Rhonda Rios-Kravitz, Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz, and Matt McDonald.
I don't see Moyes.
Rhonda?
Rhonda?
Rhonda Rios-Kravitz?
Following Rhonda is Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz, and then Matt McDonald.
Good evening, Mayor and City Council members.
I live in District 7, and I want to thank the City Council for its commitment to funding the field network.
However, we are facing an urgent crisis.
Masked ICE agents are arresting community members without warrants, conducting workplace raids, and tearing families apart.
They are targeting ordinary people doing ordinary jobs, not criminals, not insurrectionists.
They are targeting working members of our community who are our neighbors, our friends, and our family members.
This is a perilous moment in our history.
Given these escalating threats, additional emergency funding for fuels efforts must be considered in order to provide critically needed legal protections for undocumented residents.
It's time to reduce police overtime spending and instead prioritize true public safety programs through essential programs like fuel, as well as restoring funding to youth, parks, and community enrichment department, and the Office of Violence Prevention.
We need to ensure long-term sustainability by funding those services outside of Measure L.
Measure L is not enough.
Public safety allocations must focus on community well-being, equity, and social services.
We must reinvest police department funds into public programs that take a public health-centered approach to safety, not criminalization.
Community members and advocates in the city are doing vital work to redefine and reimagine what real safety looks like in their neighborhoods.
They are making the case that increased public safety does not come from additional police officers or overtime, but rather a dramatic reinvestment in critical resources that address the root causes of trauma, economic insecurity, housing displacement, and drug abuse.
Thank you for your comments.
Thank you for your comments.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz, then Matt McDonald.
Thanks, Mom.
Mayor, City Council members, good to see you again.
I'm Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz.
As the District 7 representative on the Children's Fund Planning and Oversight Commission, I'm a member of the SAC County First Five Commission, I'm hopeful and encouraged that the nearly $18 million in Measure L monies will soon be obligated to fund
the $18 million in the U.S.
and children need services that create health and safety by addressing the root causes of injury and illness and by providing purpose, opportunity, and stability for young people, families, and communities before problems occur in the first place.
Thank you for your collaboration on this effort, but I remain concerned that these funds are only a drop in the bucket.
Youth services constitute something like 1% of the budget, and it's unfortunate that ultimately even this relatively small amount of funds are being used to balance the larger city budget.
Especially, for example, by conditioning monies for the Office of Violence Prevention against investments in library infrastructure when both can and should come from the general fund.
We should not be balancing the budget at the expense of our young people and at the expense of vital community and supportive services that we know contribute to a wider and more sustainable ecosystem of community safety while leaving police monies untouched.
And on that point, as a professor of violence prevention and public health, I want to highlight a study recently published in the Health Policy Journal, the Milbag Quarterly, that used nationwide data to show that every, for one, every $100 increase in per capita police expenditures, there are thousands of years of life lost to mental health and violence-related deaths in vulnerable communities.
And by contrast, local government investments in public services like education, housing, community development and hospitals, rather than more money for police contribute to life-sustaining improvements in health and safety outcomes.
So I appreciate all of your service to the city and I hope that in the years to come as we continue to face these budget shortfalls that we can count on each of you to act courageously and not in the status quo and to fund non law enforcement community driven.
Thank you for your comments.
Thank you for your comments.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Matt McDonald is our final speaker.
And Matt is our final speaker on this item.
Good evening again.
Matt McDonald with the California Apartment Association.
As we've said before, we're opposed to a budget that increases the burdens of the city's deficit on the businesses and property owners of the city through 300 plus increased city fees.
They should not be squeezed harder right now in the face of high inflation, tariffs and economic uncertainty in order to cover the city's shortfall.
With respect specifically to the burdens on housing providers, I want to remind the council again that rental housing is price controlled.
So much of the additional revenue the city takes out of providers pockets is unlikely to ever be recovered.
There is real lasting damage to the viability of rental housing in this budget.
We do accept that government sometimes is forced to make unpleasant, unpopular choices.
But even if we in the business community accept that notion, this problem isn't going away after this year to the tune of another 60 million dollar deficit in 2026.
As we've been told so many times and again tonight, this is a structural deficit.
So let's address the strategies of the structural part in the near term so that we're not back here next year having the same conversation about small businesses further carrying the burdens of this budget.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Mayor, I have no more speakers on this item.
Okay.
Thank you for the lively public comment.
This is an opportunity to finalize our budget.
We've had hours and hours of debate led by our chair, Roger Dickinson, the budget committee.
We've had several hearings this spring and summer as well.
And so if you remember us last time, we kind of set in motion a draft and asked city staff to go back and fine tune a few items.
And I just note that this is, you know, 1.6 roughly billion dollar budget in general funds about 800 million.
In the last hearing, we were talking about fine tuning, I think two to 3 million.
So hope we could keep our comments tonight focusing on just that and what we're coming back with.
So I'll start off with council member Dickinson.
Thank you.
Thank you, mayor.
And as we begin, there was one, one item.
If you spoke to it, Pete, I missed it.
But the proposed fees increases on senior programs.
I think you had something to say about that.
Yes.
Correct.
Council member.
So those would only apply to people who are not residents of the city of Sacramento who are utilizing those programs in the city.
So if you're a city resident, you would not see a fee increase for those senior programs.
Okay.
So just so everybody is clear on that.
Our residents in the city who are seniors who are using programs at the community centers, they do not, they will not see a fee increase.
So I want to, as the budget chair, I certainly want to start by thanking those who have taken the time to express themselves, whether it's here tonight or previously, whether it's in person or by email, letter, whatever form of communication that they've used.
So those comments do inform this process.
And although I know many feel that they don't make a difference, that feeling, I would argue to you, is incorrect.
We, we, we take these comments and sentiments into account.
We all try to assess what the public will is.
We try to allocate the resources in a way that we think is responsible in the final analysis, given the limitation on resources that, that, that we have.
For, for, for my own, for my own part, I, I would, I would note a couple things.
One, we've made some restorations that, that, I think are, are significant.
And some of you have spoken to those, to those tonight.
We, we, we, we're in this budget restoring $1.3 million for youth programs.
We are providing $500,000 for the fuel network, money that, in the moment, seems, seems even more urgent to, to, to provide.
We, uh, uh, preserved, uh, a DEI, uh, position, uh, on our, on our, on our city, city staff.
And I think importantly, uh, again, for my part, uh, we are avoiding layoffs.
No one, no one under this budget, who's a city employee, um, will, will be laid off.
And I, and, uh, I, I think that is a, a significant accomplishment, um, given the challenges that, that we face.
Um, uh, those challenges, uh, are both in the immediate moment and in the, in the future.
As some have noted, we still face a structural deficit that, uh, we will have to confront, uh, next year and, and the year after.
And so, uh, a significant element of, uh, our, um, responsibility is, is along with our, our staff, is to navigate a path that gets us, uh, to, uh, a balanced budget, uh, that, that reduces that structural, uh, deficit.
And, and, and yet preserves the, the initiatives and the, uh, services that, that, uh, the residents of the, of the city need and, and deserve.
Now, uh, I think as we go through that, that process and, and a start is, is being made in, in this budget, but will be, um, even, uh, I think more a focal point in, uh, next year and the, and the year after.
Um, we, uh, we are, I think examining where our priorities are, uh, and how we, how we meet those, those priorities.
Uh, in principle, I don't think that any of us, although I, I will only speak for myself, disagree with the, with the priority of investing in, in our young people.
And the, um, um, use of, uh, prevention, uh, in our communities to make them, make them safer.
Uh, and, um, making sure that, that we are helping, uh, especially our, our young people and, and families,
grow up in an environment which is, which is, uh, positive and, uh, stimulating to them to, to give them a chance to succeed, uh, at whatever they, they, they, they choose to do.
do. So I think that what we're doing here in this budget, in this moment, facing the
necessities that we have, is a responsible budget. But it is not the end of the discussion.
It is a continuing discussion. And as was indicated by Pete Coleto in his presentation,
we are committed to looking at the vacancy issue in upcoming years. I think we have to
look at how we can be more effective and efficient with the employees we have. We have to look
at, for example, the extent to which we can employ technology and other means to allow
our employees to be even more effective than they are today because of the reality that
we're not going to have an expanding workforce any time soon. And we have to look at potential
revenue sources, which we've already talked about that, such as the business operating
taxes as one example, and there may well be others. So I think that it's important to see,
at least, again, from my perspective, addressing my first city budget, it's important to see
this in a continuum, in a context of where are we going from a budgetary standpoint over
time in the position in which we find ourselves, in the case in which we find ourselves. So,
for me, this budget is not perfect. They never are. But I don't want to leave this, and certainly
would be remiss, without thanking the finance staff, I think, who have responded to, have given
us all the information we have asked for, have responded to our requests, have been very forthcoming.
We have identified areas that we know need and deserve further attention. But we also know
that we need to fund our city operations, keep our services at a level as much as possible that they
that they currently rise to, improve them where we can, and make those innovative changes over time, including
in this coming year, that are possible within the resources we have. So, with that, Mayor, I would move to close the
public hearing and adopt the resolution approving the fiscal year 25-26 operating budget and a 25-30
capital improvement program.
Can you amend your motion to open and close?
If you need it to be open and closed, then it's open.
Close the door. You can't just close it. Okay. Thank you.
I'll second.
Okay. We have a motion to second. Council Member Vang.
Council Member Vang.
Thanks, Mayor. Thank you to those who came to speak today in support and in opposition of the proposed budget.
There is no easy decision, only tough choices that we have to make here on the dais.
Council Member Vang.
I just want to thank all of the residents that came here today to really share your lived experience
and your priorities for the budget. I also want to thank Pete and Marthala and Interim City Manager
for all their hard work to get us in this moment and also for answering all of my questions during
budget debates and conversation. And even in between those, when I was emailing Pete and he's
incredibly responsive. So, Pete, I just really want to say thank you for answering all those questions.
And I also want to take this moment to thank the mayor for including in his amendments after the May
20th debate three of the four proposals that the community members asked me to fight for.
And so I just wanted to thank the mayor for that, listening to the consensus and thanking my colleagues
for listening to the community on that front. Pete, I know that we've been at this for several months
now. I've asked all the questions that I could. I've also made recommendations on how we can restore
critical programs by utilizing some of the PD vacancies. And I know that there wasn't an appetite
for that at the last council meeting. But I do have just two questions and then mailing comments.
The first question is, I know you sent an email to a mayor and city that we're not going to be doing
any layoffs and just wanted to reconfirm that on the record. I know that when we first proposed this budget,
there were 14 actual people that we were going to lay off. And I know that there was some retirement,
some folks were leaving, we were looking for another job for them. So I just wanted to confirm
that we're not laying anyone off. Yeah, that's correct. So we had 12.8 full-time equivalent
positions that would be eliminated that were filled. You know, we had retirements and people promoting.
So we had, as of a couple weeks ago or as of now, we have seven people who are currently in those
positions and we have another place for all seven of those people in the city. So no layoffs.
That's great. So no layoffs. The other question that I have, and I did share with you that I was
going to ask this because I think it's important just for transparency is that our compensation
commission didn't make a recommendation to provide mayor and council salary raises. And I know that
at the last debate, we talked about that if we were going to add something to the budget,
we got to take it from somewhere. So I just wanted just clarity on where those salary raises will be
coming from. Is it coming from the bottom line? Like where is it coming from?
So yeah, that that will basically come from available fund balance. So it will be an expense
in the general fund and we have enough projected balance at the end of next fiscal year to cover
that expense. Yeah. And that's about like I think 125k or so. Sorry, for salary and benefits. Yes. Okay.
Okay. Okay. Thank you. Um, so I just have some comments. Um, one, I, again, like I said, I, I,
I appreciate the mayor adding to his amendment, the restoration for three of the key things that we
fought for. That's restoring the 1.3 million for youth violence prevention, restoring the field network,
because they are our frontline defense for our immigrant and refugee communities and restoring
the diversity equity inclusion position, because we desperately need that given that we passed the
resolution last December to start operationalizing and implementing the racial equity resolution.
But I do want to acknowledge that this is a win and it's important to celebrate our accomplishments and
our wins. Uh, but I want to also acknowledge that these are one-time fixes, right? And I know
as a council member in my fourth year that we're going to be back here right again, we're going to be back
here again, defending these restorations again. Um, and I also want to acknowledge because I, you know,
folks are saying that, you know, we're not absorbing any position in PD. My understanding is that in this
proposal, we are eliminating 23 vacant CSO position from the police department. So I want to acknowledge
and appreciate a PD for offering some of the vacancies up. Um, even though I know they still have over 150
vacancy that's left open. Um, but that is nothing compared to the 56 vacant position in our parks and
youth that we're actually eliminating in this, uh, in this budget this year. Um, and so for me, um,
um, you know, I voted no on previous budget. I usually do my very best to, to fight for those
key things that the community wants. Like last year it was a language access coordinated this year.
It was those three items. But for me, the budget as a whole doesn't reflect the transformative change
that we need to make as this, as a city. Um, something I just want to share, you know, last year,
our, our city staff actually went out to the community to ask them what reductions would you make?
If you were the council member, what reductions would you make in the 2025 and 2026 budget? And I, um,
have the, um, actually, I actually have the, the ranking here and I want to share with my colleagues
and I emailed this to the city clerk, if she can pull it up as well. Um, and I wanted to share the
survey results actually from that survey. We went out to the community at large and asked them if you
had to cut something, what's the first thing you'll cut? And if you look at the survey results, you'll see
that the number one reduction option identified by the community that city staff went out to ask
was the police department. And if you look at the lowest rank, if you look at the lowest rank option,
it was youth and parks and our enrichment program and our community development.
And for me, this says something. This is a survey that we put out to community, right? We do all this
hard work. We spend staff time, we do surveys, they tell us what they want to hear. And then we,
we perhaps we do listen, but the, the, do we follow, do we follow up and do the follow through? And so
I just wanted to share this because I think it's important to want acknowledge staff time for doing
this, putting this together. Um, but that for me, it doesn't reflect, um, the survey doesn't reflect
the budget that is currently in front of us. Um, and I, and I'll just share again, you know, last week,
uh, there was a girl that was shot in Meadowview in South Sacramento. The week before that, a 15 year old boy
was shot and murdered. Two weeks before that, another young adult was killed in a separate shooting in
the Valley high area. And as I shared earlier that, you know, a lot of these incidents are not isolated
and they, they do reflect a deeper crisis that really demands the attention of this mayor and council. Um,
and, and I actually had a meeting last week and I want to share a little bit about this amazing community
meeting that I had with community based organization, with onsite management at Villa
Hardeen and Coral Gable with SHRA, with school site, and even with our police. And in that meeting,
deputy chief monk who used to work in South command, who I have deep respect for chief monk said, you
know, he said himself too, in the meeting that police cannot address all of the crimes that is happening
and that we need to address the root causes, right? And at this meeting, we began having conversation
about multidisciplinary approach that goes beyond policing and police was part of that conversation.
And I just thought to myself that as we move forward with this, there are orgs in this space
that we don't see the, there's unseen labor that we see. Um, and they're responding to the crisis,
moving upstream. But I thought to myself in that meeting that, you know, we don't have the resources
right now to support the coordinated violence intervention and prevention program that is direly
needed in our city as sites like at Coral Gables at site, like CV circle and D four as so many sites
in our city. And so the sad reality is, you know, as we get calls about these shooting, and then we go
to these funerals and we're with these families, the sad reality is that we already know what to do
because we've been there. And when I say we know what to do is because in 2017 to 2020, this city made
strategic investment in violence interruption and violence prevention. And in those two years,
we had zero youth homicide. And it didn't happen because it was a coincidence because it was great
summers those two years. But it's because we had CBOs in partnership with PD with a holistic approach to
address youth homicide in the city. And instead of doubling down on proven strategies, we've allowed
other parts of our budget to grow while cutting critical programs to support these partnerships,
right. And so for me, you know, Roger actually said this at a press conference actually yesterday
too, that for every $1 we invest in prevention, we get $7 back. And I was trying to look for that
research and I found another study didn't give me the dollar, but it said you would get five to seven
times more in terms of investment in prevention. And so I just want to share that like, I'm not,
you know, taking this position is really tough, because I know that every year I'm voting no. And I often,
you know, I used to have Katie Valenzuela on this council, but I also know that I may be the only
no vote. But that's not based on just because I want to vote no, it's because it's based on research.
It's based on data, it's based on lived experience, it's based on research that shows that simply
giving PD more money, it actually doesn't lead to safer and healthier outcomes in our in our
neighborhoods. That's what the data say. And so I am proud, I am proud this year that we are able to
balance our budget, that we're not going to be able to lay off, you know, staff again. Last year,
we weren't we we had the opportunity to balance the budget again, and we didn't lay off any staff.
I'm great. It's great to hear that we're not laying off any staff this year. But I will say,
next year, we're going to be facing a larger deficit. And the year after that, we're going to face an even
more larger deficit, even if we get the BOT. Right? If we don't look at vacancies, if we don't look at the
ways in which we operate, we will be laying people off. And until we transform how we allocate
resources to achieve our collective goals, we will continue to fail to see the outcomes our
community is demanding. And so I want to vote yes, because of these restorations, but I know they're
one time. And if I take a step back, and I look at the totality of the budget, and I have to ask myself,
my does this reflect your values? The answer is no. And so as much as I want to vote yes, because we got
three wins in the budget, that is still pretty small, because we were debating for many hours,
over like two, $3 million. I have to ask myself, like, is this the right path that we're moving
towards? And the answer is no. And so with that, I will be voting no on this year's budget.
Thank you. Council Member Kaplan.
Thank you, Mayor. I don't think it can be said enough to thank our city staff.
This is a year round, budgets are living documents. I do so appreciate all that you, Pete, Marthala,
your staff, the work, the time, the hours, you put in the questions, meeting with our community, Pete,
you've come out every time I've asked you to talk to my community, to explain what's going on,
because I think it's really important. Budgets, how we do things, why things are funded a certain way,
can be really confusing. Like, and honestly, I get it. When the public is frustrated,
why are certain things done a certain way? Because I also think we can do a better job of why is the
system set up this way. But I also think we could slow down and do it differently. And I have asked that
since I was elected. It's no surprise. I spent 20 years creating budgets for a government organization
that had to be balanced three years out with a 3% reserve. Why is one government entity required to do that,
but a council is not? And while I am glad we are quote unquote balanced this year, it really is in my mind,
when you look at budgets, it's fake. Because if I look at the documents, Pete, am I correct that we have
an estimated $60 million deficit? Yeah, correct. So for fiscal year 27,
the estimated deficit would be around $60 million. However, if we get some HAP funding, that should lower.
Yeah. So the minute we approve this, we're already facing a potential $60 million. And I do know,
like, a budget is a living thing. So we'll have some savings. We'll have some expenses. There may be
potential state funding. We used to think there might be federal funding. We know that that's on the line.
So then I asked myself, how are we being responsible for not only our citizens, but our staff?
Because if we're, we were able to figure out a way this year that even though there were certain staff
on the line to be cut, but we were able to transfer them in other places so nobody lost their job.
How many years can we continue to face between a $40 and a $60 million budget deficit and not cut staff?
And if we can do that every year, then that leads to how are we being transparent to the public?
Because if we constantly say we're in a budget deficit of 40 to 60, but we're able to switch things around,
and nobody gets laid off, but we're starting in a chaos of a $60 million deficit. If I'm sitting out in the audience,
I get your frustration. Honestly, I will tell you 23 years ago, it was me in the audience listening to that,
which caused me to run for office. So I've been there and I understand the frustration.
So I've asked, and I really hope this conversation comes to budget as we start this. We should be at
minimum looking at a two-year budget cycle with at least in the second year, you know, within
two to five percent of being balanced because budget always fluctuates. There's always approximately a
20, 30 million dollar fluctuation with our budget this size. But it really, I feel it is not
us being good stewards of taxpayer dollars to year after year do this knowing we immediately start with
another budget deficit without being honest that at some point, how is this not a crisis? We have
negotiations with all of our employees and our unions. If we give them raises, the deficit goes higher.
And then I also go to, we need to create a budget that reflects our council approved priorities.
I don't know what our collective, whether we agree or disagree, council approved priorities are
understanding that we have to fund essential services. If my number one is youth violence,
but that's not in the charter. We got to make sure there is certain things of, you know, the trash and
the parks and fire and sewer and garbage that are essential city services. So I think we have to maybe
pause and take how do we look at creating the budget? What are our essentials that we have to in our mandated funding?
And then what are non-essential? What are we funding? And what are those priorities after we already fund what we are mandated to do or is covered by separate fees?
I think if we look at the budget and created a different way, that might make more sense to the community to know what we're fighting over of what is essential, what have to we do, and where are the council priorities?
I do hope, I take a slightly different look, but I do hope because, you know, Council Member Dickinson, you brought this up and I really appreciated all the supplemental budget questions you asked.
Read through it. It's a lot, but it is really helpful.
We have over 121 vacant positions in our city that have not been filled in a thousand days.
We have 21 positions that have not been filled in 2,000 days. What my question then becomes, if some of those services or vacant positions are being used to fill contracts that we're hiring outside parties to do, then let's change our budget to reflect that.
Like, if we have open positions, and this was an argument in the past, in YPSI, because we can't hire enough tree trimming individuals, and we're using outside entities, then we've got to have a budget that actually reflects that, that the money set aside for these positions are actually filling the duties over here.
And then those actually wouldn't be vacant positions. That is a service we need taken care of in our city, but it's not holding vacant positions open in order to address that.
And I think then we might be having real discussions. What is really vacant? What is really not vacant? Because I guarantee you in some of those vacant, there are third party contractors that are actually filling the jobs that we need to do, but we don't know that.
So that's where I'm hoping we take a different view of how we create the budget to make it more people friendly, to make it more understandable for our public.
You know, there was one proposal that I really think we missed the boat on that we did not keep in our budget.
The proposal to charge, which would only affect not the entire city, but to charge $120 a year for residential parking permit program, I will tell you, the city of Davis, Berkeley, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, and others actually do this.
This is not new. Davis, this is standard. Our parking program costs money. We send code enforcement out to ticket people who don't comply or don't have a permit.
That is, it's not that I want to fee people to death, but this was $900,000 a year that we were like, eh, we can't do it when this is normal in surrounding cities for a program that we have that would also create a discount for seniors or low income.
That I hope we take a look at. Now, I am absolutely supportive of that we found a way to keep the youth, the 1.3 in.
But what I need to know is what are we funding in youth violence and what are we getting from that?
Because that's also what we need to keep asking and that goes to the seed tool. What are we getting from all of this? I also have the same question as Measure L.
We fund these. Are they actually implementing the program and what benefit are they having? I have always been supportive of the Fuel Network.
We have a lot of hard decisions to make in years to come, but I have been consistent in asking for a two-year budget.
We added more back in than we cut. I proposed a lot of cuts that wouldn't have necessarily taken jobs. They would have taken vacant positions that were not accepted.
And I think we need a budget that is more transparent and accountable to the public so that it answers the questions you have and so that you understand why we as a city are doing certain things.
I want my no vote on the budget not to have anything to do with what the city did, but I don't think we are doing what we need to do to be readily transparent, implement our values, and show a two-year budget when we know the minute this passes, which I know this well, that we are already $60 million in the hole.
I don't believe that is being responsible and it's being honest because we're going to be right back here talking about what do we cut, what do we save, and why it's the whole thing.
When you hit your head against the wall and get the same result, why do you keep doing it?
So how do we look at the budget differently? And I'm hoping as we go into the discussion with the new city manager and what our priorities are as a council that we look at things differently so that next year we don't have the same conversation again. Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, council member. We do have a motion and a second. I just want to close out by saying that this, you know, was not a fun process we had to deal with. I know three of the nine of us were new and the first day we got sworn in like, hey, we have a $60 million deficit. So congratulations.
But I do know that for the past few months we mitigated our, our tough work and, and I concur to district one rep that it's going to be painful next year and we did some of the easy stuff this year. So what I heard in the last few months, we wanted to minimize people having to literally lose their job, which you said.
You said, um, and we did, no one is actually losing their job. That's an individual with a family and bills and so forth. So we have positions that aren't going to be a field. I know some community members wanted more of that. Um, we wanted to, and the two groups that I heard the most here in the last four months where don't impact public safety funding and keep investing in our youth.
And granted the second group wanted to do something about public safety to do more money for our youth, but we did not negatively cut public safety police and fire, which was the top priority.
The top priority I heard from the overwhelming, overwhelming majority of our city council and the community. Don't cut core services like public safety.
We also want to make sure that we didn't cut youth programs in, in large parts, what we talked about earlier tonight, um, during the measure of all discussion, what these programs mean to our communities, what we talked about five hours ago related to gun violence.
And so there was an idea to sweep some money for youth programs. We, as a council said, no, we restored that. I know it's not part of this budget, but an hour ago we did a major action related to measure L.
Which, which, which, which I know people say, Oh, that's measure L. But nonetheless, we are essentially doubling programs for our youth tonight with this budget and measure L.
Yes, we could do more. We just take a moment to reflect that one, we're not cutting youth programs in the general fund budget about to adopt.
And two, we're essentially doubling programs for our youth in large practice.
I said, you know, stuff worked at Roger started 17 years ago.
And the other third thing we heard too was limit our increase on fees, parking, business taxes.
Sure. Some of the fees in here are uncomfortable. We've heard from business leaders tonight, but overall, I think this is a solid budget.
We did the best we could do. None of the choices that we saw on day one were ones that we wanted to do, but we have a job.
We're not the federal government. We can't print money and increase our deficit and just have reckless spending.
We have to live within our means and we're doing so tonight and we'll be back here next year.
So with that, we have a motion and a second. Please call the roll.
Thank you, Mayor. Council member Kaplan. No. Council member Dickinson. Aye. Vice mayor Talamantes. Aye.
Council member Plekibom. Aye. Council member Maple. Aye.
Mayor pro tem Guerra. Aye. Council member Jennings. Yes. Council member Vang. No.
And Mayor McCarty. Aye. So that is all in favor except council member Kaplan and council member Vang were no votes.
So the motion passes. Thank you. So we now move to council comments, ideas, questions and AB one, two, three reports.
And I do have eight speakers for matters, not on the agenda. One, two, three last week?
I did not do it. Well we did meet last week, right?
That's right. Yeah. Council member Vang.
Thank you city clerk. Just a few announcements. A reminder to everyone that we have our MetaVue certified farmers market every Sunday from nine to 1pm at the MetaVue light rail station.
light rail station. So stop by and come support our farmers market.
And then I also just want to give a shout out to all the graduates that are
graduating class of 2025.
A special shout out to Valley high school graduates.
They graduated May 29th and I will be at the Luther Burbank graduation.
I participate in the graduation on stage since I've been a school board member
and a council member. So go Titans.
I'm really excited to be walking or actually being on the stage at the safe
credit union center to celebrate our graduates.
And then just a few announcement next to Saturday,
June 21st from 11 to 2 PM Delta Shores community is doing a festival to kick off
the summer. That's from 11 to two o'clock at, um, at Delta Shores.
So swing by for that.
And then I also want to let y'all know that, uh,
our swimming pool is going to be open soon.
And so on June 14th and June 15th of the Pinnell pool will be open from one to
six, Cabrilla pool will be open from one to five.
And district eight will actually be sponsoring the admission.
So free admissions for all ages for the entire opening weekend, um,
covered by my office. And so come out and come splash, uh, in our pools.
Um, and then I also wanted to share that a SACRT is holding a transit idea
exchange workshop on Wednesday, June 25th from six to seven 30. Um,
it's going to be a way to, um, interact with SACRT. Uh,
it's going to be an interactive workshop with South SAC folks to really bring
voices together to shape the future of transit. Um, and then lastly,
the most important announcement, um, please join us.
I would love to invite all my colleagues to join.
I don't think we'll violate Brown act or anything, but, um, if y'all just,
we didn't talk to each other as much,
but state of district eight is June 28th from 10 to two at the Pinnell community
center.
This is my invitation to all my colleagues in terms city manager city staff
and our community to come join us for our state of district eight.
This year's theme is we got us the power of community.
So hope to see you all there. Thank you.
Thank you. Uh, I'd like to do one AB one, two, three reports, uh,
council member Gary and I had the opportunity to attend our 40th annual trip
with our sister city to Genon, uh, two weeks ago. So, um,
had a great opportunity to talk to local government officials as well as
continue this 40 year tradition,
as well as learn a thing or two about air quality transportation.
And, uh, we learned that they're doing it very well as far as EV, um,
infrastructure and public transportation. So thank you.
So thank you. I have no, um, other council members signed up to speak.
I do have 10, uh, speaker slips. I'm going to call off some,
I'm betting some people got tired. First is Alan, Sarah, Melissa,
Lambert, Mack worthy.
Thank you all for being here. It's been a long day. I'm tired. You're tired.
You know, I'm not a professional activist. I'm not paid to be here. I
spent all day, uh, working to make sure that California has a safe and stable food
supply. And then I come here to talk about things that are important to me.
And I know that's important to you, but this is what's important to me right now.
I was last here on February 11th after I personally witnessed my friend,
Raymond, a Christian Zionist, Latino farm worker,
assaulted for holding Israeli flag and wearing a Jewish star. This happened in district four.
This happened in front of his wife, African-American woman, and his small child.
I have photos here. I think they'll be visible.
After he was assaulted, the area was vandalized with swastikers. Again, this was district four. The good
news. The assailants were found and charged with felony assault, burglary, unlawful possession of
a firearm and a hate crime. You know who else was charged, uh, trying to get a, trying to get a firearm?
It's Mohammed Solomon two weeks before he set eight people on fire in Boulder, Colorado. So this is pretty chilling.
The bad news is the DA decided to downgrade these multiple serious and violent felonies to a single
misdemeanor with community service and probation. And that's why I'm here today to ask you to help me
hold the district attorney accountable. As detailed in the victim's letter, which I've given to the clerk
and have emailed to all of you, this decision violates the victim's rights under the Ralph and Bain Act,
which allows victims of hate crimes to get recovery for their injuries. He was sent to the hospital.
He was in pain for two weeks. He couldn't work. His glasses were broken. But if they're not charged with
the crime, it can't recover under the Ralph and Bain Act. It also contravenes the governor's policy
in the Golden State Plan to combat anti-Semitism 2024, the California Attorney General's guidance
for local prosecutors regarding hate crimes, and the Attorney General's Hate Crime Report 2023,
which is the most recent, which again demonstrates that hate crimes against Jews or those perceived to
be Jewish are the number one form of religious hate crime in California by a factor of eight. And this
was before October 7th. Hate crimes are up 500% in California. Thank you for your comments. Your
time is complete. Did I have any of the other? And you're Sarah, correct?
Yeah, that's Sarah.
That's my thought.
So good evening, everybody. I'm not a great public speaker. Matter of fact, I hate doing this more than
anything. I would do literally anything than do this, but this is very important to me.
My name is Alan Grand. I'm from Sacramento County. Just a little bit of background on myself. My
grandparents were both Holocaust survivors. My dad was born in a concentration camp, actually,
correction, relocation camp, which is what they became as they were looking for sponsoring countries.
So ever since October 7th, right, whatever you feel, you know, I'm pro-Palestine. I'm pro-Israeli. I'm
pro-Israeli. I'm pro-Israeli. I'm pro-Israeli. I'm pro-Israeli. What's happened is I'm against
Hamas, obviously, right? And what's happened in this country is a lot of people and around the world
is they support...they don't make a distinction between being against things the Israeli government
are doing and what...and just Jews. So Jews are being attacked. Totally different issues.
So, like as Sarah mentioned, Raymond is a Christian Zionist.
He's a migrant worker, farm worker, not Jewish, wearing, you know, in support.
He's wearing a Star of David and is attacked from the back, tackle to the ground,
and chased by a second guy who then I also heard him.
There was pictures here.
I hope you get a chance to look at Sarah, the pictures she provided.
Very sad.
I had never protested before, but after over a year of watching all these things on TV
and being very sad about it, I said, if I don't stand up and say something,
I'm no better than I'm just sitting and complaining.
So I decided to go protest.
Peacefully, stood out in the corner with a flag, met Raymond, very nice gentleman.
Excuse me, my phone just died here.
Okay.
What I found out was about this attack, I was really sad about it,
and let me continue from there.
So not treating it for what it, for not treating this, going after this as a hate crime,
embolens and encourages more hate.
There needs to be consequences.
Prosecutor, I just found out recently that the prosecutor wants to remove it as a hate crime
because it's easier, literally, because it's easier.
This is not acceptable.
We need to...
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Our next speaker is Melissa.
Thank you for your comments.
Your two minutes is complete.
Thank you for your comments.
Melissa?
Melissa Grand, Sacramento County.
Thank you for your time.
Anti-Semitism and hate crimes are drastically rising.
For every report of crime there are, there are many others where the people are terrified
to come forward and say they were a victim.
Well, here in Sacramento, on February 8th, we had our friend Raymond was attacked.
He was a victim of this type of crime.
And he came forward.
He has evidence.
He's coming forward to say this has happened to him.
In our city, I look to the police.
I look to the citizens.
I'm going to the city to protect us, to protect us as citizens.
And I find out that they're probably not going to prosecute this to the fullest extent.
It would be a failure for Sacramento to not do that.
It makes me scared to think that this assailant might be charged with a misdemeanor and back on the streets.
But he was in possession of an unlawful firearm when arrested.
Do you think he won't be able to get another one?
Do you think he won't the next time this happens, which if he's not prosecuted to the full extent,
there probably will be a next time?
We're inviting this to happen again in our city.
And I will not feel safe.
Visitors will not feel safe.
And your citizens will not feel safe.
So we do not want to send the message that this behavior is acceptable on our streets.
It is not okay.
I want to feel safe in Sacramento.
Please enforce the law.
Prosecute this to the fullest extent.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you for your comments.
Lambert, then Mack Worthy, then Yana Mandugani, Michael Milton, Rev, Kion Bliss.
Let's see.
How do I end this thing?
First of all, I attended a workshop on the Brown Act.
It was held in this chamber last year.
And one thing I learned during that Brown Act workshop, and I was the only one in the audience,
just like I've been the only one at different commissions.
Measure U is one.
Race equity.
The only one in the audience.
Can you imagine being the only person in the audience for Measure U?
As much money as comes into the coffers of this city?
And I also wanted to send a shout out, which I see people are not paying attention.
I really don't understand why people stay.
Because the people who are up on the roster, you're being paid to pay attention.
We're not being paid.
You should pay attention to us.
If we didn't care, we wouldn't be here.
And another thing is, from my math, today I saw this overhead projector work.
It worked today.
So that tells me it wasn't out of order.
That's going to be a First Amendment situation there.
I saw this work today.
It came up.
This is not out of order.
You just use it when you want to.
And I want to send a shout out to a guy that's the supervisor in 311.
311 should receive more funding.
His name is Mike Brown.
He's the supervisor.
We called him to get some grass cut in an alley in Del Paso Heights, and he got it done.
So shout out to Mike Brown.
And it's been an honor knowing Mr. Worthy.
You got to have a lot of integrity to do what him and I do under fire.
Mackworthy, then Yana Mandigano.
People, maybe I know too much history of this town.
Lake of California City.
If you do an investigation, if the government come in, I can go back to 1978.
I was in that building.
I saw all the bullshit put together.
I didn't take it nowhere because I knew what the city was going to do.
That's the reason the city, the Lake of California City, agreed to put more money at local level,
to bring their money to local level.
That's where you didn't have the people here that had the investment ability.
That's where the Bank of America got burned by utilizing the escrow money, which is taxpayers' money.
See, that's how the developers got in here.
See, this was intent by a sanctuary city.
You got more common people in this way.
I encourage the United States government to get involved here.
I'll still be here.
I probably won't be in this state.
I'll be close to Washington, D.C., and I'm going to start writing to newspapers to get the government involved now in the state of California.
Why Trump in there?
Because they're using Trump's theory here.
And I saw this stuff here.
The California city, that is, people.
I got the documentation on it.
Right here, the city.
And they abused money by dealing with developers to take over this town right here.
So, people, Dixie, you got a long ways to go, baby.
And it'll never come unless you get the fellow government involved here.
And so people go to jail that should be in jail now.
Next speaker is Yana.
Is Yana still here?
Michael Milton.
Rev.
Then Kion Bliss.
And then Alicia Yaffe.
Rev.
Well, as I sat there and fell asleep through most of this stuff, I agree on many things.
Knowing that the youth need help, because I deal with the streets, as many may know.
I live in the streets, been doing it for 14 years, running Prayer and God Street Ministry.
Before you was probably even in office good there, McCarthy.
McCarthy, Jennings, you just keep hanging around for lunch.
But to be able to stop the crime on the streets, I deal with them nightly.
I pull around the old sack about 2, 3 in the morning after everything shut down, and there's your youth.
Nothing to do.
Half of them got guns.
They got in my limo.
Hey, you mind if I bring my gun?
You ain't putting your gun up in here.
You better get it in your trunk.
So, I deal with them out there.
I see what's needed.
And I need people instead of people just running their mouths saying, I'll help you do this.
I don't need none of that right now.
I need some things that will be tangible for me to be able to work with the youth, to be able to work mainly with my homeless people, because they both go hand in hand.
You know, I got 18, 19-year-old, 15-year-old kid out here.
He was from Oregon.
He kept coming by, giving me his little story, everything going on, the way he had a couple of guys cornering him.
One guy slapped him because a dog jumped out of his car, but he was lying and telling everybody he was 18.
So, when he got fed up and everything else, and I was like, look, you're just setting yourself up a target.
You're going to wind up getting raped and everything else out here.
They did push up on him, and that boy came back with a bicycle.
I don't care if he stole it or not.
He's like, Rev, I'm riding all the way to Oregon.
I'll hit you up when I'm in ready.
I haven't heard from him.
So, I don't know where things are going with people in this city.
They're coming up missing.
Homeless people come to me.
The van had pulled up, made some of them get in and taken off.
All kind of everything.
All the little crazy laws, they keep coming up past the Occupy Movement.
You was here with the Occupy Movement.
They couldn't touch none of my homeless people's stuff, period.
As long as there was one person stationed there, they couldn't touch nothing.
So, it's things I'm pushing on that's unheard and unseen, and I don't care if I die over it.
Just had a stroke to go with my heart attack.
Thank you for your comments.
Keyon Bliss is our next speaker.
Keyon Bliss.
Just a moment.
I think you're, go ahead, Keyon.
Don't get me wrong.
I know that some of you actually have real values and principles that you wish you could,
that you try to live up to.
And some of you really do your best
and speak up in those moments.
But what I would really want to see right now
is just some moral courage
to really stand on principle just once.
To do what was right,
what your constituents in the community
are actually asking you to do.
You patronize us when you try to explain
how complicated the budget is,
how we don't understand.
Guess what?
I've been studying the budget since 2016.
I know how it's, like, I know how it works.
And there are many of us in the community
that help demystify this all the time.
So when you talk down to us,
tell us, oh, we just don't understand
about the issue of vacancies, about overtime,
or these program cuts.
You're insulting us.
You disrespect us by treating us
as if we are just children, unruly,
and needing a guiding hand by daddy or mommy.
We are not.
You might get more respect
if you actually talk to us like you have respect.
Doing a two-year budget cycle
has nothing to do with transparency.
It has everything to do with making y'all more comfortable
so that you don't have to deal
with these tough and painful meetings
year after year.
And by the way,
if you want to think outside the box
when it comes to youth funding,
think about, like,
outside the box thinking would have looked like
cutting the half of Measure L
that's going towards the city
or looking at absorbing police vacancies
to boost the CBO half.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Our last speaker is Alicia Yaffe.
Alicia?
Hi again, everyone.
Alicia Yaffe, District 4.
I wasn't planning on staying this long,
but here I am.
I just had lots of things that I didn't read
from my first comment.
One, I just wanted to address,
I understand, Mayor,
that you,
the kind of comparison you made
about how many comments
are people wanting to cut from public safety
and other comments are people wanting
to support youth violence prevention.
Well, if we are following this 2020 resolution
that defined public safety
as including youth violence prevention,
that's really not a fair comparison
because those of us
who want to see youth violence prevention
also want to see public safety.
We just define it differently
and actually define it in a way
that's aligned with the 2020 resolution.
In addition, I just want to say to,
if we want to address the structural deficit
as well as the unfunded liabilities
that we have as a city,
it's math, right?
I'm an engineer as well, right?
You have to solve the problem.
You're either going to increase revenues
or decrease costs.
There isn't much space left in our budget
to decrease costs
unless we want to decrease
the operational budget elsewhere
other than the 60-ish percent
that goes towards police and fire
already in our general fund, right?
So we really need to consider
like just basic math here, right?
We need to make a cut somewhere.
Are we just going to cut everything else
that the city does other than policing?
Because ultimately,
that's where we're going to end up.
One other item that I want to bring forward,
I'm an American Jew.
I run a nonprofit,
I help run an organization
that does humanitarian aid work in Gaza.
My friend, who's a doctor on the ground in Gaza,
he's the one who founded this.
Zionism is not Judaism.
It is,
I don't want to see hate crimes against people.
I don't want to see violent crimes against people.
But to call Zionism and Judaism the same thing,
it's not a hate crime.
Thank you for your comments.
Your time is complete.
Mayor, you have no more business
to come before the council.
You may adjourn.
Thank you.
With that, we will adjourn.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Discussion Breakdown
Summary
Sacramento City Council Meeting - June 10, 2025
The Sacramento City Council met on June 10, 2025 to discuss and vote on several major items including the FY2025/26 city budget and Children's Fund grant awards. The meeting began at 6:27 PM with all council members present.
Opening and Introductions
- Council recognized Pride Month and Gun Violence Awareness Month with special presentations
- Mayor McCarty and Council Member Guerra reported on recent Sister City visit to Jinan, China
Consent Calendar
- Approved 15 items including contracts, grants, and infrastructure projects
- Notable items included:
- Change orders for Sump 151 Outfall Replacement ($4.1M)
- Contracts for building repairs and roof replacements
- Grant acceptances for abandoned vessel removal ($85K) and air quality improvements ($3M)
Public Hearings & Major Items
Sacramento Children's Fund Awards ($17.9M)
- Approved Scenario 1 funding distribution to 24 programs
- Programs focus on youth violence prevention, mental health, and early childhood
- Council emphasized need for better process and definitions for future funding rounds
FY2025/26 Budget Adoption
- Approved $1.6B total budget with $800M general fund
- Restored $1.3M for youth programs and violence prevention
- No employee layoffs required
- Notable elements:
- Maintains public safety funding levels
- Eliminates 56 vacant parks/recreation positions
- Projects $60M deficit for FY2026/27
- Passed 7-2 with Council Members Vang and Kaplan voting no
Key Outcomes
- Successful adoption of annual budget despite structural deficit concerns
- Doubled youth program funding through Children's Fund awards
- Agreement to review budget process and explore vacancy reductions
- Commitment to examine revenue options and two-year budget cycle
The meeting adjourned at 10:38 PM after extensive public comment and council deliberation on both major items.
Meeting Transcript
I'm sorry. Call this meeting to order. Please call the roll. Thank you. Councilmember Kaplan. Here. Councilmember Dickinson. Here. Vice Mayor Talamantes. Here. Councilmember Plekibom. Councilmember Maple. Here. Mayor Pro Tem Guerra. Here. Thank you. Councilmember Jennings. Here. Councilmember Vang. Here. And Mayor McCarty. Here. You have a full quorum. Okay. First. Landed government and pledge. Who is in charge? Mr. Tannett. Okay. Can we have Councilmember Maple do the land acknowledgement and pledge? Please rise if you are able. Please rise for the opening acknowledgments in honor of Sacramento's indigenous people and tribal lands. To the original people of this land. The Nisenan people. The southern Maidu. Valley and Plains Miwok. Putwanyan two peoples. And the people of the Wiltson Rancheria. Sacramento's only federally recognized tribe. May we acknowledge and honor the native people who came before us and still walk beside us today on these ancestral lands. By choosing to gather today in the active practice of appreciation of acknowledgement and appreciation for Sacramento's indigenous peoples history, contributions, and lives. I remain standing. Salute. And pledge. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. And to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God. Indivisible. With liberty and justice for all. And all of the things that we have to do to make sure to be.