Mon, Mar 24, 2025·Sacramento County, California·Boards and Commissions

Sacramento Flood Control Agency Board of Directors Meeting - March 20, 2025

Discussion Breakdown

Engineering And Infrastructure70%
Community Engagement30%

Summary

Sacramento Flood Control Agency Board of Directors Meeting

The March 20, 2025 meeting of the Sacramento Flood Control Agency Board of Directors convened with all 13 board members present. The meeting was live-streamed and recorded for later re-airing on March 22nd.

Opening and Public Comments

  • Meeting began with roll call and Pledge of Allegiance
  • Live-streamed at Metro14live.sapcounty.gov

Key Public Comment

  • Joe O'Connor presented concerns about Army Corps of Engineers Contract 3B
  • Highlighted concerns about flood protection work between Howe Avenue and Mayhew drain
  • Project involves removal of 685 trees and extensive vegetation
  • Requested peer review and reformation of technical resource advisory committee
  • Speaker emphasized lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina experience

Executive Director's Report

  • Federal fiscal year 2025 funding update provided
  • Congress passed continuing resolution with $1.4B reduction for Corps construction projects
  • Two projects received annual funding (Thomas and study project)
  • Updates on Folsom Dam maintenance:
    • Installation of stop logs on gate 8 as proof of concept
    • Progress on dike one including geo membrane installation
    • Dike six excavation work for flood wall construction

Administrative Matters

  • Passed Resolution 2025-024 regarding Board of Directors Finance and Policy Committee appointments
  • Director Johns appointed to committee

Key Outcomes

  • Consent matters items 1-5 approved
  • Announcement of Washington D.C. visit in first week of April
  • Executive Committee meeting canceled for April visit

Meeting Transcript

All right. Thank you very much everybody. Welcome. Happy afternoon. Welcome to the March 20th, 2025 meeting of the Secondary of Flick and Troll Agency Board of Directors. Would the clerk please call the roll. Thank you. Director Desmond. I'm sorry. Director Ones, Doug. Director Hume. Here. Director Kennedy. Here. Director Rodriguez. Here. Director Surnin. Here. Director Ginny's. Here. Director Kaplan. Here. Director Pluckybong. Here. Director Holloway. Present. Director John's. Here. Director Abdus. Here. Director Perez. Director's. Devins. Here. And Director Surnin has entered. Thank you. We have a full 13 number. Thank you. Will you please join me in the pleasure of the emergency. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands one nation under God, indivisible, liberty and justice for all. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. This meeting of safety is being live streamed at Metro 14 live dot sap county dot gov and will be recorded and re aired on Saturday, March 22nd at 3pm. Members of the audience who would like to address the board should please identify yourself for the record and limit your comments to three minutes. Thank you. Thank you very much. With that next item, please public comments. I believe we do have one. Is it Joe O'Connor? Yes. All right. Okay. I'm Joe Connor. I'm here to speak to about the Army Corps of Engineers. And Joe, just so you know, that this week is the perfect time for Joe Connor to be coming visiting us. Thank you. All right. Anyway, I'm here to speak about on the Corps of Engineers contract 3B, which is on the lower American river in the parkway. I'm a member of the lower American River Task Force, the bank protection working group and Parkway coalition. By way of background, I'm from New Orleans. I have family and friends there and everyone remembers Hurricane Katrina in August 2005. Flood at the whole area, wind damage, water damage, but the big thing was flooding. Within days of being allowed to return, my brother died in the aftermath while trying to repair his home. After the funeral, I stayed to tour the whole area, city, the whole city, all down river, the Mississippi coast, and so forth. What I saw is hard to describe and I'm not going to try to. Everyone I knew had flood damage. I'm well versed in what a flood can do and I don't want one from Sacramento for Sacramento. Back to contract 3B. Flood protection, which is flood protection between how Avenue and Mayhew drain. I'm not here to criticize the course of flood control plan. It provides flood protection while limiting damage to the parkway. That being said, it does do a great deal of damage to the parkway, including wildlife habitat damage. People are very upset with the plan. Caused for the removal of like 685 trees and a great deal of other vegetation and long reaches of rock on levy faces. And bank protection, which means it'll never return to its present condition. I want to make a suggestion and try to gain support before moving ahead. Let's have something like a peer review before we do this. Let's reform the technical resource and advisory committee, which is a subcommittee of the bank protection working group of what's on the member. And out of few members that have other ideas about what can do, what can be done to protect banks from eroding. Let's have in-person meetings only nosom meetings. All the data is there. It's been collected over the years. I was there, watched it. I would add, I would add some more boring along this particular stretch of blood protection. Boring is in the ground to determine exactly where erosion is unlikely to occur. Mr. O'Cutter, can you wrap up? I am. Thank you. This is no criticism. It's a normal course of business. I worked for Lockheed missiles in space company. We had peer reviews. This was a normal course of business. Sometimes there were improvements, sometimes not. Considering the damage that's about to be done, it's worth a second look. Can we gain the same level of blood protection with less damage? It would greatly satisfy the public. My handout, which I suppose has been handed out to you, is a copy of what I presented to the environmental impact report a year ago.