The Sandy City Planning Commission met on Thursday, July 16, 2026, at 6:15 PM in the City Council Chambers. Chair Lenny Stappenport presided, joined by Commissioners Danny Shawnew, Ron Mortimer, Cameron Duncan, and Steve Rigley (later votes also included Dave Bromley, Daniel Schoenfeld, Stephen Wrigley, and Lenise Davenport). Staff included Planning Director Mike Wilcox, Senior Planner Sarah Stringham, and others. The meeting covered three public hearing items: a modified site plan for the 106 Church property, a subdivision and special exception for Hollow Bend, and a subdivision and special exception for Indigo. The commission also discussed the process for an upcoming ADU code amendment and approved prior meeting minutes.
All right. Oh no. I don't know. There's something wrong. I try exiting and rejoining. So there's a lot of other things that would like to address or changes what you know as well. But that's it was basically that one. I mean, if it captured it, it basically sells whatever discussion was now extended. I mean, we have this guest houses. But there is a fee only on a very large lot. You know, this is what we have right now for X. Shares and stuff like that. Yeah, but you would bring that up. So like oh wait, well there's kind of five. Yeah, who is trying to give it in terms of just uh like a furry on hot average and outlet size those like isn't it? So relevant first are already those same things for accessories. That's what that's it. That's what it was pulling up. But like my lot they said, my office is 10,000 square feet, so I could set them up square feet. Exactly. Or yeah, and that would make it a lot possible, but so yeah, so it seems like there already is something to work on. Yeah, that's just the nature of the documents for the accessory buildings that I created. There's I mean there's nothing uh I think that it's for a sensory but seven hundred and fifty square feet, that's bigger than six hundred and fifty. I don't know. So that would be a place to start. Well, the six six fifty um is just in relative to the parking requirements in terms of state law. It's a statewide shooter. Then they have 650 uh or F2 or is just what you could require the parking space up to 650, it was beyond that and require to a parking space. Uh but they don't require it to be you know at least six fifty aggregations, but it serves the state law. I was born in work on base, so I throw my house. I drove my office, which I don't see how big of a detached do I think it's not basically I mean, kind of I think that concern I had about everybody coming in and popping up with this patch square in the laws. The way the house is fulfilled by the setback, there's just a lot of back if you have that one foot setback for two-story school. Yeah. Or yeah, or attach it and that way it would be more efficient to patch it. Yeah, yes. And then I have already met. And then I'll print it off for an expedition. I have a co-worker who wants to put a little one in his backyard or his parents. So I kind of thought, well, that's kind of nice to actually see a floor by an elevation. I could write that off. During our last discussion, I think we we all generally had some pretty cohesive box uh around where I think that really one of the areas will uh maybe very good. I should understand this one. Uh certainly uh we want to subprint out that we have circulated around and have a discussion on it. Yeah, yeah. Um but I don't know, I just my memory of that last meeting is that uh you really were pretty implied for me part of the box on things. There might be and that's why I think that's fitting to uh be going through something, you know, like that alignment so that we can really on what it is. We do not forward and that would be nice. Do we so we do know where the council things what they're doing is to all know if they're possible? Would we be able to know what that is as we're going through our discussion? That will be part of our presentation uh when when we present our recognition, because what what we're attempting to do is spread the needle between everybody, right?