The Sarasota City Commission held a workshop on March 18, 2025, from approximately 10:01 AM to 12:53 PM in the SRQ Media Studio, to continue and finalize proposed revisions to the City Commission Rules of Procedure. The meeting was chaired by Vice Mayor Debbie Trice, with Mayor Liz Alpert arriving at 10:02 AM and Commissioner Kyle Scott Battie arriving at 10:04 AM. City Auditor and Clerk Shayla Griggs led the discussion through proposed changes page by page.
And we don't have the cheat sheet, so you don't need that for work. Shall we just start opening the meeting? Okay. I uh am calling the March 18th City Commission workshop meeting to order at 10 a.m. Sorry. Thank you. Um and the agenda item is the continued discussion of the City Commission rules of procedure. And I think I'm gonna turn it over to Ms. Griggs. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Okay, so today we are trying to do a little bit of a wrap-up on the commission rules and procedures so we can get this kind of finalized what you all are looking for and then bring it officially to the commission for a vote. We will also have to do um uh we have a resolution. Is it either resolution or orders change as well with that? So we'll we'll tie all that down. So first things first, I kind of want to go through this, highlight everything that was changed, and then we can discuss anything else that you all may have suggestions. Okay. Should we discuss it while you're go while we're going paragraph by paragraph? Well, let's do this. I will say let's go paragraph by paragraph that I the the things that we changed and what we heard from you all as a collective and make those suggested changes, and then if you want, we can go through come back and just say, okay, I would like to maybe suggest we change this. What do you all think? If if you don't want to do that, it's up to you. I'm just trying to make it easy and clean. Um so we'll start with page two. Up on the screen, Chia. Yes, please. Page two, rule five, agenda B on the underlying part here. Sorry, let me get my I was okay with that. Let me grow down to it here so everybody can see what we're talking about. Everybody's good with that. Yeah, and I think we've been doing that. It's worked well. Yeah. So it was already in our rules of procedure, we just weren't doing it. So okay, everybody's good there. Next page is missing some C on page three. Yes, on page three C and I would actually ask um the charter officials if that's working, because I haven't had any problem getting my requests to pull consent items uh in advance. And you know, you can say if everybody else has been doing it. So I'm so far it's been fine. If you guys have a problem with it, let me know. I was just wondering if we shouldn't state in there somewhere that um while it's preferred, right? That we give advanced notice that items it like we expressly stated items still can be pulled at the table. Like if something arises at that moment and you say, Oh gosh, I didn't know, you know, I mean we still have the opportunity and should that be expressly stated. But it does say that. Where the second paragraph on under item C, it says commissioners should make every effort. It doesn't say you have to, so but so my question was should we expressly state it so that commissioners in the future know they can still pull it at the table? I think they're smart enough to be able to see that they should do something. I don't read this as it's stopping you from do it. I'm reading it as hey, we would like for you to try to do it, but you know, in it's up to you all as a board how you want us to read. I've just I doesn't I don't read it as a stopping you all from that. To me, it's clear enough.