OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Sparks Planning Commission Meeting - July 17, 2026

City Council & BoardsFriday, July 17, 2026
BodySparks, Nevada
SessionCity Council & Boards
DateFriday, July 17, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:45:06

Transcript — Verbatim
0:10

Roll call, please.

0:13

Here commissioner.

0:15

Commissioner Rossin?

0:18

Commissioner Ready?

0:19

Here.

0:19

Commissioner Ross.

0:21

Here.

0:22

Commissioner Sparker.

0:23

Here.

0:24

Okay, 2020.

0:26

Any comments?

0:27

Can I be?

0:27

Here.

0:29

Thank you.

0:29

Can we stand for the Pledge of Allegiance?

0:31

Mike, would you like to use C to buy for the United States of America?

0:41

And to the Republic for which it stands.

0:44

One nation under hour indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

0:57

Okay.

0:59

So we're at 4.1 public comment.

1:03

This is general public comment, although you can speak about whatever you'd like.

1:07

Um do we have any public comment?

1:12

Do we have any general public comment?

1:16

Okay, seeing no general public comment, I'm going to close public comment.

1:21

And we're going to go to 5.1 approval of the agenda.

1:28

Madam Chair, I move to approve the agenda as written.

1:32

Okay, we have an approval by Commissioner Kramer and a second by Commissioner Rossin.

1:37

Do we have uh any dissension?

1:42

Okay, please cast your vote.

1:43

There it goes.

1:45

Maybe not going.

1:48

Maybe pardon?

1:49

Voice vote.

1:50

Okay.

1:51

Do you have a voice vote?

1:52

All in favor?

1:53

Aye.

1:53

Any opposed?

1:55

Seeing no opposition, the motion passes.

2:00

On to our public hearing items 7.1.

2:05

Pardon?

2:09

Six.

2:10

Um Madam Chair, there are no minutes for approval this evening.

2:12

Thank you.

2:13

I didn't think so, but thank you.

2:14

Okay.

2:15

Uh on to uh public hearing item 7.1.

2:19

PCN 01056 CU26-0008.

2:29

Hi, Kim.

2:51

Chair and members of the planning commission.

2:52

For the record, Kim Mock, planning technician with the City of Sparks.

2:58

The item before you today is a request for a conditional use permit to allow for the establishment and operation of a recreation and sports facility, specifically a golf simulator within a 2240 square foot existing commercial building located at the Vista Village Shopping Center at 4830 Vista Boulevard Suite 102.

3:20

The shopping center is zoned commercial and is governed by the Sparks Municipal Code, which allows the establishment of a minor recreation and sports facility subject to a conditional use permit.

3:33

The existing building is 12,734 square feet and was approved by a special use permit and constructed in 2006.

4:03

Upon processing of payment, the golfer will receive a six-digit door code as well as a four-digit code for the golf simulator.

4:11

Codes are unique and are good for one reservation only.

4:14

No real-time bookings are allowed.

4:16

Reservations may be made 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

4:46

Requires one parking space for every 200 square feet of floor space for a minor recreation facility.

4:53

The 2240 square foot facility requires 11.2 parking spaces.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████21%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████████████████20%
Parks and Recreation███████████11%
Public Safety██████████10%
Public Engagement█████████9%
Environmental Protection█████████9%
Transportation Safety█████5%
Water And Wastewater Management████4%
Recycling Management████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Sparks Planning Commission Meeting - July 17, 2026

The Sparks Planning Commission met on July 17, 2026, to consider four public hearing items: a conditional use permit for a golf simulator facility, an amendment to the Miramonte Plan Development handbook for water infrastructure, a conditional use permit for a retail and wholesale recycling center, and an amendment to the Sparks Galleria handbook for Costco's fuel station. All items were approved by the commission.

Consent Calendar

  • Agenda Approval: The agenda was approved unanimously by voice vote.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 7.1 (Golf Simulator): One written public comment expressed concerns about unsupervised 24-hour operations and potential underage drinking. Three speakers addressed the commission:
    • Chris Perigary (representing Pinocchio Family LLC, a shopping center owner) opposed the project, citing concerns about alcohol consumption, lack of on-site monitoring, and the risk of changing the center's family-oriented character.
    • Evan Prive Sherrick (owner of a similar facility, Golf Lab 24) supported the project, presenting data from 12 months of operation in Phoenix with zero incidents of intoxication, theft, or vandalism, and noting that the facility's camera system and remote controls mitigate risks.
    • Tim McDonald (developer and owner of the subject property) supported the project, stating the applicant had complied with all requirements and questioning the objector's motives given that objector owns a nearby bar.
  • Item 7.2 (Miramonte Water Infrastructure): One public comment was received:
    • Ray Town requested a more comprehensive analysis comparing tank and pump station options, including long-term costs, reliability, and operating procedures, and asked for a continuance until such analysis is provided.
  • Item 7.3 (Recycling Center): Four written public comments were submitted. Four speakers addressed the commission:
    • Steve Mandela (owner of a medical building near the site) expressed concerns about trash, debris, traffic, and the presence of Junk King trucks and dumpsters on the property.
    • Marcus Clark (representing the Mandela family) argued that the recycling use is incompatible with the medical and professional office uses in the area and would attract illegal dumping.
    • Sev Carlson (attorney for Sparks Plaza LLC and Swift Institute) argued that the application lacked substantial evidence for approval, citing inconsistencies such as an outdoor pre-crusher despite claims of no outdoor processing, and that the traffic study used incorrect land-use categories.
    • Dr. James Lynch (neurosurgeon and owner of Swift Institute) opposed the project, stating it would harm patient access due to traffic congestion on Vista Boulevard and limit expansion of his medical facility.
  • Item 7.4 (Costco Fuel Station): No public comments were received.

Discussion Items

  • 7.1 – PCN 01056 / CU26-0008 (Golf Simulator): Staff presented a request for a conditional use permit to operate a 24-hour indoor golf simulator (Go Golf 24) in a 2,240-sq-ft space within the Vista Village Shopping Center. The facility would operate by reservation only, with no walk-ins. Staff found the use consistent with the comprehensive plan, compatible with surrounding commercial/residential uses, and mitigated by conditions (e.g., appointment-only, no alcohol sales, 24-hour camera monitoring). The applicant, Ed Ziteb, explained the business model, confirmed that customers may bring food and alcoholic beverages, and described remote monitoring and locking capabilities. The commission discussed concerns raised in public comment about unsupervised alcohol consumption and concluded that the controls were adequate.
  • 7.2 – PCN 04051 / PD23-0004 (Miramonte Water Infrastructure): Staff presented an amendment to the Miramonte Plan Development Handbook to modify potable water infrastructure requirements. The amendment would replace a planned storage tank (deemed infeasible due to land ownership) with an additional pump station (Vista #6) as recommended by Truckee Meadows Water Authority. The amendment does not change the number or type of permitted residential units. Staff found all 10 required findings could be made. The commission heard public comment requesting further analysis but proceeded to vote.
  • 7.3 – PCN 26-0005 / CU26-0006 (Recycling Center): Staff presented a request for a conditional use permit for an unlisted use – a retail and wholesale recycling center (Modern Salvage) within an existing 24,000-sq-ft industrial building at 650 Vista Boulevard. The facility would accept source-separated non-hazardous materials, process them indoors, and sell items retail or wholesale. A 6,000-sq-ft outdoor storage area (enclosed by the building and topography) was included. Staff found the use materially similar to permitted industrial uses and recommended approval with eight conditions, including requirements to prevent trash accumulation. The applicant, who also owns Junk King, described operations focused on diverting reusable home goods from landfills, using indoor processing and an enclosed pre-crusher. The commission questioned the applicant about outdoor storage and trash containment, and the applicant clarified that no loose materials would be stored outdoors.
  • 7.4 – PCN 15025 / PD26-0004 (Costco Fuel Station): Staff presented an amendment to the Sparks Galleria Handbook to increase allowed fuel dispensing nozzles from 18 to 24, clarify sign standards for gasoline service station canopies, and refine the definition of convenience store service stations. The amendment is needed to support Costco's proposed expansion of its fueling station. No public comments were received. The applicant requested a minor correction to the staff report (a typo in the sign analysis).

Key Outcomes

  • Item 7.1: Approved unanimously (motion by Commissioner Priestos, second by Commissioner Nieberlin, no dissent recorded). The conditional use permit (CU26-0008) was granted based on findings C1–C5 and subject to eight conditions.
  • Item 7.2: Approved unanimously (motion by Commissioner Kramer, second by Commissioner Priestos). The commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the handbook amendment, based on findings PDA–PDJ.
  • Item 7.3: Approved (motion by Commissioner Priestos, second by Commissioner Kramer; no roll call vote shown but motion passed). The conditional use permit (CU26-0006) was granted based on findings C1–C5 and eight additional findings for unlisted uses, subject to eight conditions.
  • Item 7.4: Approved unanimously (motion by Commissioner Kramer, second by Commissioner Nieberlin). The commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the handbook amendment, with a noted correction to the sign analysis in the staff report.

Meeting Transcript

Roll call, please. Here commissioner. Commissioner Rossin? Commissioner Ready? Here. Commissioner Ross. Here. Commissioner Sparker. Here. Okay, 2020. Any comments? Can I be? Here. Thank you. Can we stand for the Pledge of Allegiance? Mike, would you like to use C to buy for the United States of America? And to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under hour indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Okay. So we're at 4.1 public comment. This is general public comment, although you can speak about whatever you'd like. Um do we have any public comment? Do we have any general public comment? Okay, seeing no general public comment, I'm going to close public comment. And we're going to go to 5.1 approval of the agenda. Madam Chair, I move to approve the agenda as written. Okay, we have an approval by Commissioner Kramer and a second by Commissioner Rossin. Do we have uh any dissension? Okay, please cast your vote. There it goes. Maybe not going. Maybe pardon? Voice vote. Okay. Do you have a voice vote? All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Seeing no opposition, the motion passes. On to our public hearing items 7.1. Pardon? Six. Um Madam Chair, there are no minutes for approval this evening. Thank you. I didn't think so, but thank you. Okay. Uh on to uh public hearing item 7.1. PCN 01056 CU26-0008. Hi, Kim. Chair and members of the planning commission.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com