The Capital Committee convened on March 23, 2026, to review the results of the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) survey, discuss the FY27 capital budget outlook, and consider recommendations from staff for both the regular capital budget and a second tranche of General Obligation Bonds (GOB). The committee reviewed a proposed list of projects totaling approximately $50 million in regular capital funding and roughly $21–22 million for GOB issuance, with a focus on addressing critical needs, leveraging federal grants, and incorporating CAC input. A subsequent meeting was scheduled within the next week to finalize recommendations for the Board of Estimate and Apportionment in April.
All right. Good afternoon, everyone. This is a meeting of the city's Capital Committee. Today is March 23rd, 2026. Thank you all for joining. It's been a while since we've met, and I wanted to go over and just bring you up to date on some things. If you if you're last, if you recall from our meeting, and I believe in the early February, we had a preliminary review of an out the outlook for the capital budget for next year and talked a bit about the projects and potential projects, our critical needs, our inventory that Rich uh went over. And then we sort of went on a hiatus uh pending reviews from the Citizens Advisory Committee. So we had a number of weeks of meetings with the Citizens Advisory Committee, and they uh received some presentations for the various departments. And then we also got their input at the end of a survey. So uh with a survey at the end of the process. So what I'd like to do here uh today is uh just present the results of that survey, and then we can get into any updates we have for the uh uh our outlook, and then Rich has got some recommendations he'd like to discuss, and we can get into that. Uh, and then we'll just take it from there and see where we are. So um let me share uh pull up the survey results and start sharing my screen here. Okay. Is can everyone see that? Yes. All right. So uh as I mentioned, we met over mostly most of the month of February um once a week, and then we also had a first week in in March. Uh and we had presentations from it from all the key categories of needs, starting with I believe parks and courts and uh uh streets and uh fire department and then building and fleet and all of that. So uh let me just summarize what our results were from the citizens advisory committee. We had uh fairly good representation across the city. Now, again, not everyone participates, and not everyone appoints some uh members, but we did have a total of uh 15 responses. Actually, the the number of participants was about 22, 23. So we got the majority. That's a little up from last year. So we but it's distributed geographically through the through the city. And our survey responses by critical uh type uh project type. Uh what we do is on a scale of one to 10. We uh with 10 being the of greatest import and uh one being the less, uh, what categories grabbed uh most sit uh most of the participants and as terms of key league of key critical areas and uh city vehicles being uh non-fire police were one of the higher areas uh and corrections of other public safety that includes the PSAP, and you'll see when you get some of the results. Uh City Hall, also we also had uh long discussion about city hall and the needs for city uh building, particularly with the roof repairs. Bridges, uh, particularly when you have a matching fund, uh, they are very keen on the fact that uh getting the bigger bang for the buck, and if there's money out there, you can grab that with uh federal monies, and uh along you go. Fire department is always rated highly, and then it and other uh and then it goes down uh from there. Um some of the top 10 projects uh by rating, uh, as I mentioned, city hall group repairs. We talked talked about that a bit, and then and it and some people rated that highly when they when they got the survey. Uh fire department again had a couple of projects that were rated highly, as they typically do. Um some of the uh hazardous street removal and street trees, uh was also a big discussion. Uh and then again, the bridge project, particularly the Compton Bridge, uh, that Rich can go on to detail a lot. It's been it's been a multi-year project, and it also involves a lot of federal funds as it's a major project here. Um and then South Refuge Station, we talked about, and that that also got rated highly on the on the on the results. And then uh with the court's presentation, uh the old uh uh we talked about that as well, but this one actually old municipal court building talking to uh talking about securing windows and doors was rated highly, as well as refuse division vehicles. Uh it's funny because we talk about vehicles, um, we break out that category, refuse and everything else, and refuse usually gets a good response in in terms of the need for making sure that part of the fleet is up to date. Those are the top 10. And then on the bottom 10, uh, I always include this just sort of as an FYI. The Christie Cycle Boulevard track and pedestrian improvements, some uh water service to circuit court building, some of the Carnahan uh replacing supply and waste piping. I think that was presented in the courts areas, not as critical as some of the other thought things that we were talking about in terms of like facade replacement and such. So that's probably why it was uh rated less important than others. Um the Wi-Fi upgrade as well, some of the bike uh facility improvements, which I think we're gonna accommodate a portion of uh Fallon Park uh the parking lot repairs, uh some of the AC handling unit at the academy, and then the Lyle House. There was a big discussion on the Lyle House. Uh uh Ottawa Schweizer, you'd be interested in that.