Surprise City Council Work Session on BESS Zoning and Marley Park CFD Meeting – June 2, 2026
Surprise City Council Work Session and Marley Park Community Facilities District Meeting – June 2, 2026
The Surprise City Council held a work session to discuss a proposed zoning text amendment establishing a Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) overlay district, followed by a brief Marley Park Community Facilities District (CFD) meeting. The council took no action on the BESS amendment, deciding to continue the item to a future meeting for further discussion.
Discussion Items – BESS Overlay District
-
Staff presented a proposed zoning text amendment to create a Battery Overlay District for large-scale battery energy storage systems. The amendment defines BESS terms and sets development standards including an 8-to-12-foot perimeter wall with a 150-foot on-site setback from the property line, and a separation distance from existing residential dwellings. Staff originally proposed 1,500 feet separation, but the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended reducing it to 100 feet (plus the 150-foot setback, resulting in 250 feet from battery cabinets to existing homes).
-
Fire Department staff (Chief, fire marshal, and third-party expert James Caulfield from Fire and Risk Alliance) explained that the original 1,500 feet came from the Emergency Response Guidebook for worst-case evacuation, while the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard 855 recommends 100-200 feet for planning purposes. They noted that safety technology has advanced and that public safety remains the primary consideration.
-
Sipand Alazata from the Arizona Technology Council advocated for reasonable setbacks, emphasizing the need for battery storage to support Arizona's growing tech industry. He recommended clarifying the ordinance to apply only to utility-scale systems (e.g., five megawatts or more) and that noise limits be specified in decibels (dBA) rather than using subjective terms like "perceptible."
-
Anna Smith, Ben Clough, and Tim Russert from APS expressed support for the amendment but argued that the 1,500-foot setback was excessive and not aligned with NFPA recommendations or other neighboring jurisdictions. They stated that APS's own facilities use a minimum 100-foot setback without a block wall around the batteries.
-
Council discussion focused on the appropriate separation distance. Councilman Duffy asked why 100 feet is safe; experts explained that NFPA standards are based on science and have been adopted internationally. Councilman Judd questioned the discrepancy between 1,500 and 100 feet and inquired about risk scaling with the number of cabinets – experts stated that risk does not increase because each cabinet is individually UL-tested and does not propagate. Councilman Judd expressed discomfort with allowing the overlay in residential areas. Councilman Melton suggested a five megawatt threshold to distinguish utility-scale systems from smaller commercial applications, and staff indicated they could incorporate that.
-
Vice Mayor noted that a BESS facility he visited had fire suppression inside each cabinet, but the expert clarified that current technology no longer uses suppression agents; instead they rely on monitoring and cooling of adjacent containers. Councilman Haney requested more education on terminology and risks, particularly regarding safety for firefighters and residents 250 feet away.
Key Outcomes
- No action was taken on the BESS text amendment. The item will be continued to a future city council meeting for further discussion. Staff will provide council with expert contact information and incorporate feedback (including potential five-megawatt threshold and noise specifications) before the next meeting.
Marley Park Community Facilities District Meeting
-
The CFD board unanimously approved the consent agenda (minutes of May 5, 2026).
-
Item 2: Consideration and action on Resolution MP CFD 202603 regarding the board's intent to levy secondary property taxes on June 16, 2026. The item was introduced by Ms. Simmons, but the transcript does not include the board's deliberation or vote; the meeting adjourned shortly thereafter.
Meeting Transcript
Order Tuesday, June 2nd, 2026. Madam Clerk, please call the role. Mayor Sarger. Present. Thanks, Mayor Greenberg. Here. Councilman Haney? Here. Councilman Duffy. Here. Councilman Melton. Present. Councilman Hastings? Here. Councilman Judge. Here. Thank you, Mayor. We have quorum. Thank you. Please join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. Here I'll do this in the meantime. All right, Madam McClerk, please read item number one. Item one presentation, discussion, and public comment pertaining to a prep hosed zoning text amendment to the surprise land development ordinance to establish a new battery overlay zone related to battery energy storage systems. FS twenty-three one zero four one. Good afternoon. Good evening, Mayor and Council. Just waiting for my presentation to load real quick. So the purpose for tonight's work session is to provide you with some background and information. So to give a background on the timeline, we've been working on this for a few years now. Um our initial outreach meeting was back in January of twenty twenty-five. Tonight we're here for a work session with City Council. Overall, the commission was generally supportive of us doing the text amendment, um, created an avenue for the use and the approach that we provided with the the proposed amendments. Some specific topics of discussion were noise. There was some feedback that our approach to addressing noise was not clear and defined enough. Um, our response to that was that it's just mirroring and referencing a different part of existing code. There was some feedback that our exception for residential and multifamily um projects in relation to like rooftop solar, for example, did not uh was not expanded to commercial purposes. Um, so our our staff's proposition would be to revise that um exception to include um commercial type uh rooftop solar installations. There was a discussion on the acceptable distance um from uh residential and the setback requirements. We had discussion on the economic impact of these facilities and then flexibility and administrative discretion that we're proposing within this text amendment. Overall, the commission's consensus was to reduce the uh proposed separation from 1,500 feet down to 100 feet, and we'll get into the details of that here in a second, and then clarify the exemption for commercial type best installations. So, first um, part of our text amendment is to define some terms that we're going to use. So, battery energy storage systems, also known as BES, uh, is being defined herein, where um it's a facility consisting of all the components that go into a best facility in order to store energy and to release it at a future time. Um, that last statement where not to include any batteries or systems that are located within single or multifamily residential projects. That's where we could add that additional clarification that it would also exempt this from like I think the example that was provided was a Walmart has rooftop solar and they want to have batteries associated with that rooftop solar, exempting that from these standards. And then for battery cabinet, um, this is a term that is used throughout our um proposed text amendment. So defining what those individual battery cabinets are as well. So our approach with this is to create a zoning overlay district um to accommodate uh best facilities. So first um giving an overview of what is an overlay zoning district. This is a special zoning district that can be combined with one of our existing zoning districts, essentially layered on top of it to modify certain regulations that come with um standard zoning applications. Um combined with uh existing zoning districts, these can these types of overlay districts can provide flexibility.
openpublica.com