Housing Committee Meeting on HUD NOFO Impacts and Permanent Supportive Housing – February 26, 2026
Housing, Community Development & Public Health Committee: HUD NOFO Impacts and Updates – Permanent Supportive Housing
This meeting convened on February 26, 2026, at 4:00 PM in Toledo City Council Chambers to discuss the impacts of federal funding cuts to HUD's Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) on supportive housing programs. The committee heard a detailed presentation from Julie Imbri, who outlined a 12-month destabilization timeline, direct and indirect community impacts, and financial consequences. Discussions emphasized the interconnectedness of homelessness, housing stability, local businesses, and public systems. No formal votes were taken; the committee committed to further planning, data sharing, and advocacy.
Presentation & Report
- Julie Imbri presented on the current scale of funding jeopardy: 750 households (approximately 1,200 individuals, 30% children) are stabilized by this funding; over 50 landlords and businesses would be directly impacted; 30+ program-specific employees face layoffs; 128 participants whose employment relies on supportive services are at risk.
- At least $3.1 million in total funding is jeopardized, including over $2 million in rental revenue to landlords.
- A 12-month timeline was detailed: within 30 days, all PSH placements would halt; within 30-60 days, shelters (currently at 588 beds full, with 465 individuals waiting) would see increased demand; after 90 days, program reductions and closures would begin, leading to workforce layoffs and permanent loss of housing stock.
- Current systemic pressures: 250 people served in warming centers (duplicated) with 60-90 nightly; 36 individuals in warming centers have psychiatric needs beyond shelter capacity; an estimated 50-60 additional individuals with similar needs are not in shelters.
- Financial impacts already felt: agencies have fronted $150,000 in unreimbursed funds, escalating to $500,000/month by June/July.
- Legal environment: Congress appropriated funds for about 10% of projects; majority of COC funding renews in Q3 and remains in jeopardy; HUD has yet to provide clarity.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Sandra Desteno, Director of 211, described the rising complexity of calls: individuals with disabilities, older adults, single mothers facing high childcare costs ($55/day to work, earning $40/day), and nursing home discharges to homelessness. She noted the loss of prevention dollars and lack of rental assistance post-ARPA.
- Pastor Leo Cunningham, St. Paul’s United Methodist Church, stated that while congregations are exploring partnerships (e.g., with Uptown Business Association, Vistoula neighborhood), existing church buildings cannot accommodate beds/cots due to fire suppression system requirements; he urged a "both-and" approach of federal/state pressure and local inspiration.
- Emily Matthews, Program Manager for 211, thanked the committee for support with warming centers and stated that Toledo's model is being emulated across Northwest Ohio. She encouraged council members to visit the warming centers.
Discussion Items
- Councilmember Gaddis requested a heat map of landlord locations and data on housing types (single-family vs. apartments) and landlord characteristics (local vs. out-of-town). Ms. Imbri agreed to generate that data.
- Councilmember Gaddis also asked about best practices for public restrooms and trash management; Ms. Imbri cited a Detroit-based “Throne” trailer model and noted existing stress on Metro Parks restrooms.
- Councilmember Gaddis expressed interest in using district funds for solar charging tables and requested a meeting to discuss Uptown issues.
- Councilmember McPherson emphasized the need for community-wide solutions, thanked churches for hosting warming centers, and suggested thinking creatively (e.g., Cincinnati converting a closed school into a shelter for students).
- Councilmember Saranto asked about approaching closed churches for overnight shelter; Ms. Imbri responded that the priority should be stabilizing existing shelters before expanding, highlighting that St. Paul’s winter crisis shelter will close March 8 (one week early) due to funding cuts.
- Councilmember Williams urged the council to pressure federal representatives to restore funding, noting that cuts are hurting the poor while millionaires are prioritized. She also raised the concept of a Tent City, though funding and location remain challenges.
- Councilmember Craig noted that state cuts have reduced library hours, pushing more unsheltered individuals to TARDA hubs. She linked the $600 million stadium levy to misplaced priorities.
- Sergeant Kelly Russell of TPD shared her experience as a CIT coordinator, noting a 30% increase in mental health calls over four years. She emphasized the need for more alternatives to jail for unhoused individuals and described successful one-at-a-time interventions.
- Building official Jim Hough briefly commented on code barriers: churches lack sprinkler systems required for housing; warming centers are permitted as long as no sleeping occurs.
- Ms. Imbri noted that restrictive zoning codes hinder creative solutions (e.g., tiny homes, tent cities) and suggested reforming zoning to ease development.
Key Outcomes
- The committee requested a heat map of PSH landlord locations, data on housing types and landlord residency, and cost projections for public restroom solutions.
- Ms. Imbri will continue working with the Mental Health Recovery Services Board to assess provider reserves and landlord willingness.
- Council agreed to send letters urging federal and state representatives to restore housing funding.
- Future meetings will address zoning code alterations to reduce homelessness and explore alternative housing models (e.g., tiny homes, tent cities) subject to regulatory feasibility.
- The committee affirmed the need for continued collaboration among city, county, mental health board, TPD, TARDA, schools, faith communities, and business associations.
Meeting Transcript
I think we've both been around. We got a few things up our sleeve, right? Yeah. I call to order the housing, community development, and public health policy committee for Thursday, February 26, 2026. Clerk, please call the role. Jones. Here. Gaddis. Kramer. Martinez. McPherson. Meldon. Williams. Here. Well, thank you everyone for attending this important committee meeting. Just to give some background. I um basically what happened with the funding that was cut regarding mental health services, prompted the conversation of how these essential organizations within the city are very important. And what will happen to our clients Hill, our those who use these services if they were to cease to exist. So this is to really paint a picture about of course the importance of these organizations and services, but also get to thinking about what can we do in order to really preserve our these services based upon what's going on federally as well as statewide. So at this moment, um I will hand it over to Miss Julie Imbri. And you can and also public comment is permitted. Thank you. I don't have it separate, just to know. Okay. Apologies. I believe you have a copy though. Yep, we do have a copy, and we can provide um Ladistar can also provide the copies as well for the public. Um so as uh councilwoman Jones had um described, uh part of what we're here to talk about today is an ongoing conversation we've had regarding federal cuts to uh supportive programming that significantly impacts particularly persons with severe and persistent mental illness within our community. And uh there are two different models, both a short-term and a long-term model that are that are impacted uh by this change. And uh this isn't a project uh that's based on theory. Uh part of what's going on is we have a system-based forecast grounded in how our homeless response infrastructure currently operates that this totally wipes out if we if we lose these fundings. And so when we look at the scale of current housing interventions, um, the different funding risks and the legal uncertainty facing a lot of the continuum of cares. Um what we'll talk about today is to present what a 12-month destabilization uh timeline might look like, uh multiple direct and indirect community impacts that Toledo will feel and uh part of the discussion will also be the financial consequences associated with those impacts. So the core principle or piece you know, really to look at today is that when housing funding disappears, homelessness doesn't. And costs do not disappear, they shift and they increase to other sectors. If you look at the second slide in your packet that council has, um you might recognize this from our previous presentation uh as far as representing the number of folks statewide that will be impacted by these funding and potential cuts. So we just wanted to put that in there as a little bit of a refresher as we move forward to what we're looking at. So let's take a moment to look at the current scale and impact of what we're looking at. This funding currently stabilizes 750 households, approximately 1,200 individuals. 30% of these are children. Partnerships with more than 50 landlords and businesses will be directly impacted. We feel that that number will be much greater on an indirect basis. Over 30 program specific employees will exit the workforce. And there's the potential for 128 participants who are in the program whose employment desperately is related to their ability to maintain not just housing but also supportive services, which are what help keep them independent and functioning and excelling persons within our community. When we look at the financial impact, we're looking at at least $3.1 million that is in total jeopardy. This is not a new number to you, but I want to break out a little bit more today what the more significant impact is as we're working through and realizing what some of the details are. More than two million in this will be rental revenue to landlords. So we're going beyond just program participants, but we're looking at workforce small businesses and entities that are serving our community that are going to be significantly impacted by this. This impacts individuals in our community spending money. This impacts recoupable property taxes on and on.
openpublica.com