OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Toledo, Ohio/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Toledo Committee of the Whole Meeting on Solid Waste Contract – March 25, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, March 25, 2026
BodyToledo, Ohio
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, March 25, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:44:06

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
1:01

That's all right.

1:05

No, once that's done, that's a little bit more thing.

1:22

I'm gonna start doing this because it's gonna be because you're gonna be able to do that.

1:41

I'm gonna send you my cat.

2:00

Or how about this?

2:10

Yeah.

2:24

Okay.

2:59

Okay.

3:13

So it's the rest of the client.

3:37

Yeah.

3:51

Yeah.

3:57

Okay.

7:12

Good afternoon, everybody.

7:14

Welcome to the City Council Chambers for the Committee of the Whole.

7:20

This Wednesday, March 25th at 4 p.m.

7:23

to discuss the solid waste contract.

7:25

Clerk, will you please call the room?

7:27

Hobbs.

7:29

Jones here.

7:32

Kramer here.

7:33

Martinez.

7:34

Present.

7:35

McPherson.

7:36

Here.

7:37

Melden.

7:38

Morris.

7:41

Williams.

7:43

Driscoll.

7:44

Here.

7:44

Gaddis.

7:46

Seven present.

7:47

Thank you so much.

7:49

If you have had the opportunity to sign in, wonderful.

7:53

If you've not, we have uh some sign-in sheets on the side over here.

7:57

Uh to my right, your left if you wish to speak and make public comments at any time.

8:02

Um we will first hear from uh the folks here at what we call the pit.

8:08

Just some representatives from the city as well as from Priority Waste.

8:11

Um and then we will allow for questions to come from council members to the folks in the pit and then open it up to public comments.

8:19

And at that time I will go in order of who signed in.

8:22

So please make sure that you do.

8:25

And uh we will keep the comments to three minutes uh so we can hear from as many people as possible.

8:32

If you hear somebody say something that you were planning to say, uh please try to be as succinct as possible when you come up to say it then too.

8:40

Uh and with that, I will turn it over to the administration to get us started.

8:44

Thank you.

8:44

Good afternoon.

8:45

Thank you.

8:46

Hello, members of council, Megan Robson, Chief of Operations for the City of Toledo.

8:50

Um today at the table, I'm joined by Commissioner of Solid Waste, Ryan Murphy.

8:54

Um, Vince Huyumpa, who is the chief executive officer for priority waste.

9:06

And Austin Austin Azaretti, the director of the PIP command for priority waste.

9:12

Also, um, we have other members of our team, including Joe Fosna, the director of public service for the City of Toledo, as well as Michael French, Chief Strategy and Growth Officer for Priority, and Sam Karamanga, Vice President of Municipal Relations.

9:27

Uh, we appreciate the opportunity to speak with you today regarding our recommendation to enter into contract with priority waste for the upcoming curbside refuse and recycling contract.

9:41

As council is aware, the current contract between the City of Toledo and the Lucas County Solid Waste Management District and Republic will expire on August 31st, 2026.

9:52

About ten months ago, the city team, along with the Lucas County Solid Waste Management District sought proposals for a new refuse and recycling contract.

10:00

We received proposals from Republic Services, Priority Waste, Rumpke, Waste and Recycling, and FCC Environmental.

10:08

Today we will take you through the process of our selection.

10:13

We will also introduce you to members of the Priority Waste team and their operations and services that they will provide to us, as well as the transition plan and what our residents can expect.

10:27

During the time that we were doing our requests for proposals and looking at options for the new refuse and recycling contract, Council members Gaddis and Comives hosted talking trash meetings in all of our council districts, and we received over 3,600 responses to a survey that we put out for our residents to learn what they were looking for as a part of the new refuse and recycling contract.

10:54

That feedback was really important to us, and we took all of those comments that we received from those community meetings as well as the survey responses.

11:04

And basically we're able to compile those into three service areas that our residents really wanted to see.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████████████████████55%
Solid Waste Management█████████11%
Public Engagement████████10%
Procedural████5%
Personnel Matters████5%
Fiscal Sustainability███4%
Community Engagement██2%
Technology and Innovation██2%
Workforce Development██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Committee of the Whole Meeting: Solid Waste Contract Discussion

The City of Toledo Committee of the Whole met on Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at 4:00 PM in City Council Chambers to discuss a proposed new refuse and recycling contract. The administration recommended entering into a five-year contract with Priority Waste, citing improved accountability, technology, and bulk collection. The meeting included presentations, council member questions, and public testimony, with many speakers opposing the switch due to cost, union labor concerns, and Priority Waste's track record.

Consent Calendar

  • None noted.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Janet Beam (Hill Avenue resident) expressed support for Republic Services, noting A+ Better Business Bureau rating (Priority rated F), and stated her neighborhood has no complaints and issues are resolved quickly.
  • Diana Schreiner (Bancroft Hills resident, United Neighborhood Residents representative) supported Republic, criticized Priority as non-union, and said Republic has resolved issues since weekly bulk pickup began.
  • Mark Schmiehausen (Principal Officer/President, Teamsters Local 20) accused Priority of violating union rights: claimed that after Teamsters Local 247 won an election to represent 30 drivers in Detroit, Priority fired 20 of them the next day. He urged council not to replace union workers with a non-union contractor.
  • Carlton Surtman (Toledo homeowner since 1971, Point Place) praised Republic's service improvements since January (weekly bulk pickup without scheduling) and called switching to Priority a gamble with taxpayers' money.
  • Blair Johnson (South Toledo resident, entrepreneur) questioned Priority's capacity, accountability, and operational readiness, noting the tight timeline for hiring and equipment. He also cited illegal dumping as a broader issue and asked about cost impacts on residents.
  • Slinda Hendrix (East Toledo resident, community activist) cited 1984 city blight commission proposals, praised Republic's recent improvements, and insisted on mandatory union labor in any contract.
  • Miranda Napier (East Toledo resident) reported positive experiences with Republic, with issues resolved same day, and opposed switching to a non-union company.
  • Rick Rolfe (General Manager, Republic Services) stated Republic submitted the lowest cost proposal ($1.7 million lower than Priority in year one) and noted Ohio law requires selection of lowest and best bidder unless a real emergency exists, which he argued does not. He also highlighted Republic's 154 Toledo employees (82 living in city/county) and recent service improvements.
  • Gary Lenhart (community activist) criticized Republic historically but acknowledged recent improvements; opposed Priority due to non-union status, high cost ($8.7 million over five years vs. Republic), and Priority's documented struggles in Michigan (missed pickups, default proceedings). He called for a two-year contract with performance renewal.
  • Fanny Effler (Old West End Association, Toledo Old Town Neighborhood Association) expressed frustration with lack of notice about the meeting, praised Republic's responsiveness, and opposed the switch.
  • Renee Dallas (Bancroft Hills area resident) urged council to address landlord and tenant accountability rather than solely blaming Republic or Priority.
  • Mike Haynes (President, Toledo Police Patrolmen's Association) highlighted budget pressures, urged against paying more for similar service, and supported shorter contracts with opt-out clauses based on performance.
  • Tony Toddy (UAW Local 14 President, downtown Toledo resident) cited his experience with union-busting trash company Value Point and opposed Priority, warning of similar problems.
  • Paul Konwinski (Secretary-Treasurer, Teamsters Local 20) cited multiple Michigan communities (Dexter, Orient Township, Macomb Township, West Bloomfield) with service complaints, defaults, and fines against Priority. He argued the higher contract cost could force cuts to city employees (police, blight team).
  • Mark Sobczak (former Council President) requested data on Priority's non-union wages, questioned where Priority would house vehicles, and stressed that enforcement of set-out rules is key regardless of provider.
  • Susan Tyson (Arlington area resident) supported Republic for two years with closer oversight, criticized rental property blight, and worried about cost increases on fixed income.
  • Kathy Shotty (South End resident) supported Republic and called for more enforcement staff.
  • Dylan Keel (resident) noted Priority fired its founder/CEO in February 2026, detailed higher daily cost ($4,856 more per day than Republic), and recited complaints from Michigan communities (Macomb Township default, Bloomfield Hills switch).
  • Daniel Rabb (President, Toledo Police Command Officers Association) opposed higher cost given city budget cuts and delayed police classes; noted only 3,600 residents responded to survey out of 200,000+.
  • Redon Jones (UAW Local 12 member, Point Place) opposed outsourcing to non-union company.
  • Larry Keel (Republic employee, 15 years, former city solid waste worker) said he would be displaced and appealed to council to retain Republic.
  • Jerry Harris (Republic sales) stated he hears negative comments about Priority from businesses daily due to rapid expansion and service issues.
  • Cheryl Gaston (Republic employee) asked council to give Republic a chance to fix issues, noting many council members have called her directly to resolve problems.
  • Jade Sendley (Republic swing driver) shared her positive experience: Republic provided CDL training and career advancement.

Discussion Items

  • Administration Presentation: Megan Robson (Chief of Operations), Ryan Murphy (Commissioner of Solid Waste), Vince Huyumpa (CEO of Priority Waste), and Austin Azaretti (Priority's Director of Integrated Technologies) presented the recommendation. They noted the current contract with Republic via Lucas County Solid Waste Management District expires August 31, 2026. The city received proposals from Republic, Priority, Rumpke, and FCC Environmental. Selection committees narrowed to Priority and Republic. Priority's bid was $1,120,000/month (modified); Republic's was $977,600/month. Priority's original bid was $935,300/month, lowest at first.
  • Key Selling Points for Priority:
    • Five-year contract with five-year renewal option.
    • Service Level Agreement (SLA) with performance metrics (e.g., call answer within 90 seconds, >98% route completion).
    • Weekly bulk collection (up to 5 items) on same day as refuse.
    • Technology: cameras on every truck, real-time route monitoring, dedicated Toledo customer service (LDCs), and a resident portal.
    • Commitment to unionization (met with Teamsters Local 20); bid includes union wages.
    • Commitment to hire Toledo residents.
    • No impact on city employees (contract covers curbside only).
  • Cost Comparison: The administration stated Priority's higher cost ($1.12M/month vs. Republic's $977,600/month) provides value through reduced blight and improved accountability, potentially lowering the city's $1.7 million annual blight team expense. Republic's bid is 3% lower than current rates.
  • Reasons for Bypassing Solid Waste District: The city wants direct contract control to enforce SLAs; the county's contract lacked enforcement mechanisms.
  • Council Concerns:
    • Unionization: Several council members (Kramer, Martinez, Sarantou, McPherson) questioned Priority's union stance. Priority stated future Toledo workers could choose to unionize; they are neutral. Councilwoman McPherson expressed skepticism, noting Republic is Teamster Local 20 (54 union employees). Councilman Komives highlighted that Republic's contract lacked SLAs and accountability for 10 years.
    • Cost: Councilman Sarantou calculated $8.75 million more over five years with Priority. Councilman Martinez asked about fuel escalators; administration confirmed no changes to quoted prices.
    • Service Record: Councilman Komives cited Republic's 2021 notice of breach for bulk collection failures. Councilwoman Kramer noted Republic improved bulk only after competition from Priority. Councilwoman Jones raised Priority's CEO shakeup (founder fired Feb. 2026) and Michigan complaints; Priority's Vince Huyumpa acknowledged change was due to ideological differences but insisted company is stable.
    • Transition: Questions about timeline (Sept. 1 start, hiring in July/August), equipment availability, and contingency if Republic walks away. Priority cited experience with Flint and Hamtramck transitions under tight timelines.
    • Contract Length: Council members (McPherson, Gaddis) favored two- or three-year terms with performance reviews; administration preferred five years with renewal option.
  • Referrals: Council members requested data on blight team history (Gaddis), communications with Lucas County Solid Waste regarding Republic complaints (Sarantou), and a timeline of administration actions (Gaddis).

Key Outcomes

  • No vote was taken. The ordinance (O-113-26) is on first reading; a final vote is expected in approximately three weeks.
  • Council directed the administration to provide additional data: blight team statistics, survey results, sample dashboards from Priority's other communities, and details on Priority's recruitment plan and union wage comparisons.
  • Council member Komives emphasized the body will continue asking questions and doing homework before a decision.
  • Public comments and council discussion made clear that union labor, cost, and track record are central issues. Several council members (McPherson, Sarantou, Komives) indicated leaning toward Republic or a shorter contract with strong SLAs.

Meeting Transcript

That's all right. No, once that's done, that's a little bit more thing. I'm gonna start doing this because it's gonna be because you're gonna be able to do that. I'm gonna send you my cat. Or how about this? Yeah. Okay. Okay. So it's the rest of the client. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Good afternoon, everybody. Welcome to the City Council Chambers for the Committee of the Whole. This Wednesday, March 25th at 4 p.m. to discuss the solid waste contract. Clerk, will you please call the room? Hobbs. Jones here. Kramer here. Martinez. Present. McPherson. Here. Melden. Morris. Williams. Driscoll. Here. Gaddis. Seven present. Thank you so much. If you have had the opportunity to sign in, wonderful. If you've not, we have uh some sign-in sheets on the side over here. Uh to my right, your left if you wish to speak and make public comments at any time. Um we will first hear from uh the folks here at what we call the pit. Just some representatives from the city as well as from Priority Waste. Um and then we will allow for questions to come from council members to the folks in the pit and then open it up to public comments. And at that time I will go in order of who signed in. So please make sure that you do. And uh we will keep the comments to three minutes uh so we can hear from as many people as possible. If you hear somebody say something that you were planning to say, uh please try to be as succinct as possible when you come up to say it then too. Uh and with that, I will turn it over to the administration to get us started. Thank you. Good afternoon. Thank you. Hello, members of council, Megan Robson, Chief of Operations for the City of Toledo. Um today at the table, I'm joined by Commissioner of Solid Waste, Ryan Murphy. Um, Vince Huyumpa, who is the chief executive officer for priority waste. And Austin Austin Azaretti, the director of the PIP command for priority waste.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com