Water Quality Committee Meeting – May 13, 2026: Shutoffs, AMI, Spent Lime Contract
Water Quality Committee Meeting – May 13, 2026
The Water Quality Committee of the Toledo City Council met on Wednesday, May 13, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers to discuss three main agenda items: the residential water disconnection and reconnection plan (water shut-offs), an update on the Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) project, and the spent lime contract (Ordinance 185-26). The meeting was chaired by Councilman Adam Martinez, with members Theresa Morris and Nick Komives present; Erin Kramer and Vanice Williams were absent. Also present were Councilmembers Gaddis, Jones, and Serantu. The meeting included presentations from Megan Robeson, Chief of Operations, and Patika Bannister, Director of Public Works, along with public comment and significant deliberation on the spent lime contract.
Water Disconnection/Reconnection Plan
- Megan Robeson and Patika Bannister presented a comprehensive plan to resume residential water disconnections for non-payment, effective June 1, 2026. The plan emphasizes a compassionate yet firm approach, balancing the need to collect past-due balances with the goal of keeping residents connected.
- The process includes a five-step communication timeline: initial bill, first reminder, formal warning, final notice with an eight-day occupant letter, a seven-day door hanger, and finally disconnection. Service can be restored within 48 hours of payment or setting up a payment plan.
- About 17% of 93,000 active residential accounts are delinquent. The first group to be addressed is 102 customers who had service disconnected pre-moratorium and have made no subsequent payments.
- Council members expressed concerns about seniors, families with multiple properties (LLCs owing over $10,000), and the need for targeted outreach. Councilman Serantu urged a shorter timeline (40–50 days instead of 75) and questioned whether the process could be expedited.
- Council President Williams shared personal experience with water shut-offs as a child and stressed the importance of compassionate assistance for families under $1,000 delinquent.
- Public comment: Bob Reinbold noted issues with missing bills during billing system conversion and suggested using sewer liens as a collection tool. He also referenced a state bill that may prohibit placing liens on real property.
AMI Meter Project Update
- The AMI (smart meter) program has exchanged 122,363 meters, with 2,410 remaining. The read rate is 98% (Nov 2025–Apr 2026).
- 752 exchanges were completed in the last month, and 1,128 door tags have been hung. 634 customers have had service disconnected for noncompliance with meter exchange requirements.
- Council discussed the remaining meters and the timeline (18–24 months) due to difficult installations. Councilman Serantu questioned the need for a private consultant ($800K contract) to supervise installations, requesting training for city employees. The administration clarified the consultant's scope includes asset management and technology optimization, not just meter exchanges.
- Councilmember Gaddis requested district-level data on remaining meters and possible coupling with emergency repair funding.
Spent Lime Contract (Ordinance 185-26)
- Andy McClure, Commissioner of Plant Operations, presented the spent lime program: 50,000 dry tons produced annually, with a $5.5 million annual budget for removal from lagoons. Without accelerated removal, lagoons would not be cleaned until 2082.
- The contract under consideration is for spent lime removal and beneficial reuse (primarily agricultural). Rocky Ridge is the recommended lowest bidder, but the award has been delayed due to budget and legislative timelines.
- Councilmember Gaddis raised serious concerns about Rocky Ridge's storage site on Consol Street in East Toledo, citing dust, runoff, and health complaints from residents. Three letters from residents were read into the record describing respiratory issues, environmental damage, and lack of public notification.
- Councilmembers requested information on past contract performance (whether Rocky Ridge sought additional payments) and the bid amounts. The administration confirmed Rocky Ridge was the lowest bidder but noted that the Board of Awards had initially recommended Polcat, a competing bidder.
- Public comment: Bob Reinbold claimed the price difference between bids is only $0.41 per cubic yard. He stated that Polcat was told they had been selected in January 2026, only to be overruled weeks later. Zach Guy of Polcat confirmed receiving a phone call and email stating they were chosen, then being later told Rocky Ridge would be awarded the contract. He expressed frustration over the lack of transparency.
- Councilman Martinez requested referral to legal for examination of the bidding process, including debarment language and Board of Awards records.
Key Outcomes
- Water Disconnection Plan: Approved to resume disconnections on June 1, 2026, with a focus on the 102 most overdue accounts first. The administration will continue outreach and payment plan assistance.
- AMI Project: No vote was taken; continued monitoring of remaining installs and contractor costs will proceed. Administrative referrals were made for district-level data and potential funding for repairs.
- Spent Lime Contract: No final decision was made. Council directed referrals to the Law Department for: (1) bid documentation and Board of Awards recommendations, (2) debarment language and compliance history of Rocky Ridge, (3) past contract supplementals paid to Rocky Ridge, and (4) clarification on communication with Polcat. The committee will revisit the issue pending legal review.
Meeting Transcript
Time or really. I'm going to call to order the Water Quality Committee meeting. Started for Wednesday, May 13th at 4 p.m. Please call the roll. Martinez. Present. Morris. Call Mibes. Kramer. Williams. Two present but also present are council members Gaddis, Jones, and Serantu. Alright, fantastic. Well, thank you everyone for our attendance. I appreciate your uh willingness to come at four o'clock on a Wednesday meeting. I know it's the end of the uh the day, and I appreciate everyone's willingness to uh swap and answer some of our questions. So the way this will work is we're gonna we have three items on the agenda. Um, water non-payment plan process, so that would be the water shutoffs. Thereafter, an update on the AMI meter project in terms of how we're progressing, and then the spent line contract um legislation 0185-26. With that being said, director, the floor is yours. Good afternoon, thank you for having us. Um, Megan Robeson, Chief of Operations for the City of Toledo, Patika Bannister, Director of Public Works is joining me. We also have members of our public works team who are here in case we have additional um questions that need to be answered by more of the uh divisional experts. Um, as uh Chair Martinez mentioned, are going to go through the residential disconnection and reconnection plan, the AMI project update, as well as then the spent line legislation that we have on the agenda. So, first for the residential disconnection reconnection plan for non-payment. Um, as we move towards resuming residential disconnections, it is our goal to ensure access to water while maintaining a fiscally sound utility. During our presentation today, we will review the history of the water affordability task force and water moratorium, our utility payment process, our discount programs that we have available for residents, our process for non-payment, and our approach for outreach and communications to our residents. I'm gonna turn it over to Patika to walk us through some of the presentation. So in 2019, the Consumer Protection and Water Advocacy or Water Affordability Task Force was created to foster collaboration between the Department of Public Utilities, City Council, community organizations, and residents, whose work was instrumental in creating various initiatives under the Department of Public Utilities Consumer Assistance Program or CAP. So you can see here on the slide a number of programs that were instituted, including monthly billing, debt forgiveness program, um, uh low-income household water assistance program or uh LIWAP, and uh community technology um workshops that we presented, the financial assistance for residential customers. Um you can see some of those listed here in the framework. Um debt relief allows the utility to recover revenue. Our revenue allows us to develop and execute solutions to the challenges that we and other utilities nationwide encounter. We have three residential paths that I will discuss quickly here. Um the first path is when the payment is received by the due date. This is where the monthly invoice is mailed to the customer. The customer receives an invoice, and then the customer pays the invoice, our process for non payment single family, be the monthly bill is mailed, the invoice is due, there is a late fee that is applied, the monthly next monthly bill bill is mailed, the financial final notice is mailed to the landlord or the tenant, seven-day notice is posted to the door, the water service is disconnected, and there's a door tag left. The customer makes a payment or signs up for a payment plan. And then finally, the service is restored within 48 hours after payment or a payment plan. The process for a non-payment multi-unit customers. Monthly bill again is mailed. An invoice is due, the late fee, late fee is applied, the monthly bill is mailed, a hang notice letter is listed on each unit, a seven-day notice is posted to each unit and office door. So as we mentioned previously at the beginning of the presentation, maintaining water service is our priority, and we want to ensure every resident has the information they need to avoid service interruption. If a resident faces a potential water shutoff due to nonpayment, there is a five-step communication process really that they will that we will work through with the city of Toledo that residents will receive. Step one is going to be that initial bill. It all begins with that monthly invoice. This is mailed directly to the resident and it outlines the current usage and of course the total amount due. We then have the second step of this process, which is the first reminder. It is the initial if the initial payment is missed, a notice of non-payment will be included and mailed with that next monthly bill to the resident. This serves as a secondary reminder for that resident to help hopefully settle that balance that's owed. If that is missed and there's no contact made by the resident, then we then they will receive a formal warning.
openpublica.com