OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Tulsa Public Works Committee Meeting – May 6, 2026

City CouncilWednesday, May 6, 2026
BodyTulsa, Oklahoma
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, May 6, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:16:28

Transcript — Verbatim
0:12

Send me a picture.

0:16

Okay, thank you.

0:17

Sorry about the delay.

0:18

Welcome to the 2 30, Wednesday, May 6th Public Works Committee meeting.

0:24

Number one, call to order.

0:26

Number two, we have an appointment to the Greater Tulsa Area African American Affairs Commission, filling the vacant Greenwood Cultural Center seat.

0:36

Is Michelle Burdicks?

0:38

Come on up.

0:40

Welcome.

0:41

Thank you.

0:43

Hi.

0:45

Please just go ahead and introduce yourself to everybody and tell us a little bit about you and why you want to serve.

0:51

Okay.

0:52

So Michelle Tulsa Native Born and Raised.

0:55

I've spent most of my professional career at the Greenwood Cultural Center this June will be my 30th year there as a program coordinator, public speaker and our on-site historian.

1:08

And I'm excited about the opportunity to work alongside so many people on the commission now.

1:13

I think I know every single president has the had the opportunity to work with me with them.

1:19

And as the Greenwood Cultural Center is in the process of renovations when we reopen our doors, hopefully January, February 2027, we want to serve as more of a cultural hub, and so I'm hoping to make um better connections so that we can collaborate with some of the individuals and the commission to better utilize the space at the Greenwood Cultural Center.

1:40

Great.

1:42

Appreciate your willingness to serve.

1:44

Yes, thank you.

1:45

Do we have any questions or comments?

1:48

Okay, great.

1:49

We will be you'll be on the five o'clock agenda next Wednesday the 13th.

1:54

You're welcome to be there if you want, but don't foresee any problems.

1:58

So thank you.

1:59

Thank you.

2:02

Okay, number three discussion regarding the retail revitalization loan fund to provide an update on the budget amendment approved in the fall of 2025 related to the fund and a HUD Small Business Loan Match Program.

2:18

And we have Miss Davis here.

2:20

Yes.

2:20

It's me and Rose Washington as well, is on the screen behind you.

2:24

She was out of town, but was able to break away and join us today.

2:29

So we wanted to bring an issue back to you all just so that it was clear at the council table and you had an update on these funds.

2:39

And so if you remember back in October and November, we had three different committee discussions regarding two budget amendments.

2:46

One of those budget amendments was a budget amendment for this small business loan match program, and it was coming out of a commitment made from the 2016 Vision Economic Development Funds for Retail Revitalization.

3:02

Those funds we were just committing to a certain geographic area in District One related to the choice neighborhood program, and then those had a match somewhere else.

3:14

And so the match conditions have changed, and that is what Rose is gonna go over with you and give you a little bit more information, and then I'll just tie it up at the end.

3:25

And this was just to make sure everybody understood where that was now because it is different than what it was in October and November.

3:32

Okay, Rose, welcome.

3:34

Well, thank you.

3:36

Um is wonderful, right?

3:38

Well, thank you, counselors, for um allowing me to again speak to you.

3:44

And Sarah, thanks for teeing this up.

3:46

But as Sarah mentioned, we we wanted to come back to you uh regarding the retail revitalization loan fund commitment that uh we requested several months ago uh that was required as a match to um the Tulsa Housing Authority's uh choice um property choice development that's happening at uh 36th uh street north, and it is really the the reinvention of the old comanche, and as a part of those uh that those types of developments, those choice neighborhoods developments, there are a number of community engagement issues, and one that the community identified was the need to create opportunities for small business ownership, and so through that process, THA agreed to commit a million dollars or so to business lending under the condition that the city provided a 1.5 million dollar match, and we were tapping into the retail revitalization loan funds to provide that match, but there um we didn't have sufficient funds to cover the entirety of the match for a number of different reasons, primarily lack of communication.

5:06

So council agreed to add a million dollars from another source into the retail revitalization loan fund because there was also another $500,000 available to the fund or committed to the fund that TEDC had not drawn down.

5:22

And so fast forward to today as we continue to work with THA to get a firm commitment and a firm contract from them on the fund that they're going to commit along with the match that the city will provide, the THA's number has been changed.

5:44

So it has gone from a million or so down to 400,000.

5:48

And so what uh Sarah and I just wanted to talk about was uh the messaging to let you know that your million-dollar commitment was now only 400,000 and and we in total had uh 1.5 million dollar available for the match.

6:09

Now we've been working with uh uh counselor Archie on a big project um that still qualifies for the retail revitalization loan fund, but at the other end of the BRT, the bus rapid transit corridor.

6:27

And so uh Sarah, I don't know how much more I need to say, but what we do know for sure is that the THA commitment to the business fund uh is reduced to 400,000 at this moment.

6:43

It could be uh in the future that that commitment is decreased further as they determine uh what their financing needs are for the other uh buildings that are coming out of the ground uh as a part of 36 North, and so uh we want it to be very transparent with council to um uh be very clear in letting you know that the million that we had asked for uh that would be part of the 1.5 million dollar match for the they call it a critical community improvement loan fund for businesses in that neighborhood uh has changed a bit, and and so we've gone from uh a required match of a million and a half to a required match of about 400,000, and it it could change again, but right now we're committed to the 400,000.

7:41

So Sarah, I hope what I've said makes sense.

7:44

You can clean it up.

7:45

Yeah, I think that I think that's good, and so really at this point what will occur is um you've already appropriated those funds, so you don't actually need to take any action on this.

7:56

Um those funds that are above 400,000 that TEDC will have can still go through the program um that we have set out by the economic incentive policy, so other businesses could apply for those those funds.

8:12

They're now available.

8:14

Um, and so anybody in the retail market um study corridors, there were 12 or 13 areas and along the BRT would now be eligible for this project.

8:26

So we just didn't want people to be thinking we were double promising funds, so yes.

8:33

So thanks, Raz for that explainer.

8:35

Um we were putting in a million to unlock 1.5.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure███████████████████19%
Fiscal Sustainability██████████████████18%
Economic Development█████████████████17%
Historic Preservation██████████████14%
Legislative Policy██████6%
Facilities██████6%
Community Engagement█████5%
Pedestrian Safety█████5%
Pending Litigation████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Tulsa Public Works Committee Meeting – May 6, 2026

The Public Works Committee met on Wednesday, May 6, 2026, at 2:30 PM. The agenda included an appointment to the Greater Tulsa Area African American Affairs Commission, updates on the retail revitalization loan fund, resolutions for a judgment payment and a special election on the ONG franchise, a fee ordinance amendment, a District 5 sidewalk project, and a lengthy discussion of city-owned Route 66 assets. No votes were taken; items were discussed for future action.

Appointment to the Greater Tulsa Area African American Affairs Commission

  • Michelle Burdicks, a 30-year program coordinator and historian at the Greenwood Cultural Center, was introduced to fill the vacant Greenwood Cultural Center seat. She expressed enthusiasm for collaborating with the commission and using the Center as a cultural hub after its renovation (expected reopening January/February 2027). The appointment will be placed on the May 13 council agenda for formal approval.

Retail Revitalization Loan Fund Update

  • Sarah Davis and Rose Washington (TEDC) provided an update on the budget amendment from fall 2025. The original plan was a $1.5 million city match to unlock a $1 million commitment from the Tulsa Housing Authority (THA) for a small business loan fund supporting the 36th Street North choice neighborhood. However, THA reduced its commitment to $400,000. The city will now match $400,000 (not the full $1.5 million), leaving the remaining funds available for other eligible retail projects along the BRT corridor and other market study areas. No additional council action is required; the previously appropriated funds are now partially freed for other uses.

Resolution for Payment of $30,000 Judgment

  • Chad Becker (Treasury) presented a resolution authorizing payment of $30,000 to plaintiff Marla Stewart and her attorney from the sinking fund. The settlement resolves a 2024 auto accident involving a city employee driving a city vehicle. Damages included $9,000 in medical bills and $8,000–$9,000 in vehicle damage, plus attorney fees. The settlement precludes further litigation costs. Councilors asked about the accident location (36th Street North and Mohawk Boulevard) and confirmed it was a routine human error. The resolution will be considered for approval at a future meeting.

Resolution Calling Special Election for ONG Franchise

  • Sarah Davis presented a resolution to call a nonpartisan special election on October 25, 2026, for voters to decide on Ordinance No. 25782, which grants a franchise to Oklahoma Natural Gas Company. This is the second of three legislative actions. The substance of the franchise was discussed the previous week. Councilor Gilbert noted that community conversations were held the prior evening with limited public attendance. The resolution will be on the next week’s agenda for a vote.

Ordinance Amending Title 49 – Administrative Permit and License Fees

  • Mr. Skates (Development Services) presented an ordinance to increase building permit fees by 3% (inflation adjustment), add fees for review of LOMRs and floodplain documents, introduce after-hours/weekend inspection fees for public works, and add a fee for posting more than two signs (Planning). No questions were raised. The ordinance will be considered for adoption.

District 5 Sidewalk Project – 36th Street

  • Councilor Gilbert proposed using $575,000 from District 5 community development priority funds to construct a sidewalk connecting South Hudson and South Lakewood Avenue along East 36th Place. The project aims to provide a safe route for students walking to Bishop Kelly High School, Zarrow Elementary, and Montessori School, as well as pedestrians. The sidewalk is within the right-of-way, and the city has discussed relocating a sign from an apartment complex. Councilor Gilbert noted that additional public meetings are planned for other district projects. Completion before the next school year is ideal but depends on procurement.

Discussion of City-Owned Route 66 Assets – Repair Status and Long-Term Maintenance

  • Anna, Terry Ball (Asset Management), and Mark Hogan (Public Works) presented a draft inventory of city-owned Route 66 assets, many of which were unknown to the departments. The list includes neon signs, sculptures, plaques, planters, and other unique items. The discussion highlighted the lack of a maintenance plan and dedicated funding. Key concerns raised by councilors:
    • Councilor Dutton (District 3) expressed frustration that the east side of Route 66 (east of Yale) has been neglected since 2005, citing unlit “Route 66 Rising” sculpture, worn plaques at the Interpretive Plaza, and missing banners. She noted that many assets are in disrepair and that the city has not prioritized maintenance east of Yale.
    • Councilor Bellis emphasized the need for a maintenance fund and suggested partnering with Main Street programs and corporate sponsors. She also noted that a historical marker from the Cyrus Avery Bridge was found at an estate sale and needs to be reinstalled.
    • Councilor Roy (District 7) proposed a fiscal impact statement for future capital projects, including maintenance costs in RFPs, and suggested exploring a dedicated revenue source (e.g., a portion of economic impact from Route 66 tourism) for ongoing maintenance.
    • Councilor Mills requested an Excel version of the asset list to sort by district.
    • Councilor Bingle noted that the city’s practice of building without maintenance planning has led to deferred maintenance, and that the upcoming Vision package should include a maintenance fund.
    • Staff noted that the Route 66 Commission has been asked to pause new construction until a maintenance plan is in place. They are working to assign each asset to a responsible department and will return with cost estimates for annual maintenance and replacement.
    • Immediate preparations for the Route 66 centennial (May 30, 2026) include weekly street sweeping, graffiti removal, extra trash cans, and coordination with the railroad to clean adjacent property. The two large neon welcome signs (contracted to Claude Neon) are expected to be installed in time, but there are concerns about lead times for repairs.

Key Outcomes

  • The appointment of Michelle Burdicks will be forwarded to the full council for approval on May 13.
  • The retail revitalization loan fund update was informational; no further action is required.
  • The judgment payment resolution and special election resolution will be voted on at the next council meeting.
  • The fee ordinance will be considered for adoption.
  • The District 5 sidewalk project will proceed with community engagement; design and construction will follow.
  • The Route 66 asset inventory will be refined, shared with the Route 66 Commission, and used to develop a comprehensive maintenance plan. Staff will provide cost estimates and a proposed funding mechanism. Councilors will incorporate maintenance planning into future capital improvement packages.

Meeting Transcript

Send me a picture. Okay, thank you. Sorry about the delay. Welcome to the 2 30, Wednesday, May 6th Public Works Committee meeting. Number one, call to order. Number two, we have an appointment to the Greater Tulsa Area African American Affairs Commission, filling the vacant Greenwood Cultural Center seat. Is Michelle Burdicks? Come on up. Welcome. Thank you. Hi. Please just go ahead and introduce yourself to everybody and tell us a little bit about you and why you want to serve. Okay. So Michelle Tulsa Native Born and Raised. I've spent most of my professional career at the Greenwood Cultural Center this June will be my 30th year there as a program coordinator, public speaker and our on-site historian. And I'm excited about the opportunity to work alongside so many people on the commission now. I think I know every single president has the had the opportunity to work with me with them. And as the Greenwood Cultural Center is in the process of renovations when we reopen our doors, hopefully January, February 2027, we want to serve as more of a cultural hub, and so I'm hoping to make um better connections so that we can collaborate with some of the individuals and the commission to better utilize the space at the Greenwood Cultural Center. Great. Appreciate your willingness to serve. Yes, thank you. Do we have any questions or comments? Okay, great. We will be you'll be on the five o'clock agenda next Wednesday the 13th. You're welcome to be there if you want, but don't foresee any problems. So thank you. Thank you. Okay, number three discussion regarding the retail revitalization loan fund to provide an update on the budget amendment approved in the fall of 2025 related to the fund and a HUD Small Business Loan Match Program. And we have Miss Davis here. Yes. It's me and Rose Washington as well, is on the screen behind you. She was out of town, but was able to break away and join us today. So we wanted to bring an issue back to you all just so that it was clear at the council table and you had an update on these funds. And so if you remember back in October and November, we had three different committee discussions regarding two budget amendments. One of those budget amendments was a budget amendment for this small business loan match program, and it was coming out of a commitment made from the 2016 Vision Economic Development Funds for Retail Revitalization. Those funds we were just committing to a certain geographic area in District One related to the choice neighborhood program, and then those had a match somewhere else. And so the match conditions have changed, and that is what Rose is gonna go over with you and give you a little bit more information, and then I'll just tie it up at the end. And this was just to make sure everybody understood where that was now because it is different than what it was in October and November. Okay, Rose, welcome. Well, thank you. Um is wonderful, right? Well, thank you, counselors, for um allowing me to again speak to you. And Sarah, thanks for teeing this up. But as Sarah mentioned, we we wanted to come back to you uh regarding the retail revitalization loan fund commitment that uh we requested several months ago uh that was required as a match to um the Tulsa Housing Authority's uh choice um property choice development that's happening at uh 36th uh street north, and it is really the the reinvention of the old comanche, and as a part of those uh that those types of developments, those choice neighborhoods developments, there are a number of community engagement issues, and one that the community identified was the need to create opportunities for small business ownership, and so through that process, THA agreed to commit a million dollars or so to business lending under the condition that the city provided a 1.5 million dollar match, and we were tapping into the retail revitalization loan funds to provide that match, but there um we didn't have sufficient funds to cover the entirety of the match for a number of different reasons, primarily lack of communication. So council agreed to add a million dollars from another source into the retail revitalization loan fund because there was also another $500,000 available to the fund or committed to the fund that TEDC had not drawn down. And so fast forward to today as we continue to work with THA to get a firm commitment and a firm contract from them on the fund that they're going to commit along with the match that the city will provide, the THA's number has been changed. So it has gone from a million or so down to 400,000. And so what uh Sarah and I just wanted to talk about was uh the messaging to let you know that your million-dollar commitment was now only 400,000 and and we in total had uh 1.5 million dollar available for the match. Now we've been working with uh uh counselor Archie on a big project um that still qualifies for the retail revitalization loan fund, but at the other end of the BRT, the bus rapid transit corridor. And so uh Sarah, I don't know how much more I need to say, but what we do know for sure is that the THA commitment to the business fund uh is reduced to 400,000 at this moment.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com