This meeting to order.

I don't have a chairperson's report for director's report.

We'll recognize Susan Miller.

Hi, good afternoon.

So I don't have any cases that have been recently approved.

There'll be a lot more coming up soon.

But I wanted to give you an update.

As you know, City and County are both working to establish their own planning commission.

So the process would be for both the city council and the county commission to adopt a joint resolution to dissolve TMAPC.

And then only speaking from the city side, then the city will need to adopt a resolution to establish a new city of Tulsa Planning Commission.

So we're also just behind the scenes working on other details that will help set that up.

And anyway, so once we get a little further along or know when that date is, the mayor will start appointing people to the City of Tulsa Planning Commission, so that'll happen.

And I'll just keep you posted as as I know more.

Okay.

So any questions?

Or did you want to give an update on the county side?

Just uh briefly, you know, we did get the uh uh state statute changed to allow uh the modification of the county uh zoning board.

The original law is uh stated there's six members.

Uh they served for six-year terms, very onerous, and no one wants to you don't want to go and ask the volunteer to say, would you serve six years?

So we able to mod get that modified for two-year terms, um, uh six members plus the chair or the chair or appointee as far as the uh chair of the BOCC to be the chair of the planning commission.

But yeah, so the good thing is that law that was signed and had an emergency clause, so that will actually go in it's already in effect, so we now can operate under the new the new um state statute.

We are uh we've been meeting weekly since I got the phone call from uh from the city that we want to uh break this up and stuff.

So we're working on our process.

That the big hurdle was that the change in the statute.

Once that we are now pushing as far as as fast as we can, but um my I think we're looking probably 60-90 days at minimum, uh which I think is what is in talk with uh the city legal and so forth.

But the attorneys they're all over it.

They've just they're they Jeff and uh is dealing with our ADAs and he's just loves it.

Working diligently to get that accomplished.

Yep, thank you.

Thanks, Susan.

Uh no, we don't have any minutes approved.

There's no consent agenda item, Mr.

Secretary.

We please read our rules.

In order to conduct the public hearing in an orderly manner, we ask that you abide the following rules.

Commissioner will first hear from the staff for an explanation of the application, physical facts of the property under application and the surrounding property, followed by the staff's uh presentation of the staff's recommendation.

Commissioner will then hear the applicant's presentation not to exceed 15 minutes.

Next, the commission will hear from any interested parties or protestants.

A time limit per speaker may be imposed.

Those wishing to speak must use the sign-in sheet over to my left by the door.

For the record, please state your name and address if you choose to speak.

Finally, the commission will hear the applicant's rebuttal if any not to exceed 10 minutes.

During the hearing, the commission may ask questions of staff, the applicant or interested parties in the room or representative city legal department and development services department, and the Tulsa Planning Office staff.

We do have a taping system, therefore, please direct all of your comments into the microphone, and these proceedings are broadcast live on cable channel 24.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Good afternoon, commissioners.

So item one is a rezoning request Z7860, and then item four is a comprehensive plan amendment CPA 131.

Uh this was an item that was continued from your previous meeting for uh roughly 3.8 acre property that's located east of the southeast corner of West Edison Street and North 41st West Avenue.

Um the existing conditions on the property are that about a third of it is zone CS.

The applicant is requesting to change the remainder portion that is currently RS3 to CS as well.

Um I do want to mention there is now an optional development plan included with this.

There was at your previous meeting as well, but um we noticed on the agenda it just still said rezoning, so um just keep that in mind as as you're making any considerations that the optional development plan would need to be attached.

Since your last meeting, um the commission had requested the applicant meet more with the neighbors who had been here last time, and I'm gonna I'll leave it up to him to give you an update on the discussions that he's had with the neighbors.

Um the only change we have made at this point to the optional development plan was the increase of the fence height that is um from six feet to eight feet.

Previously we had the standard F1 screening fence requirement that we had modified now based on discussion at the previous commission meeting um that he had agreed to go to an eight-foot fence height between him the property and the neighbors' properties.

Uh other than that, the request remains the same.

The the development plan still has a list of prohibited uses that would not be allowed on the property.

Um and I do want to reiterate, I there was around this project, there's discussion about a proposal for an RV park.

Um the CS zoning as presented today, does not permit an RV park by right and would require still another approval through the city's board of adjustment uh before it would be an allowable use on the property, uh, but I do think that's where a lot of the conversation um has been focused from the applicant as he describes what he'd like to do with the property.