OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Tulsa Board of Adjustment Meeting 1387 – July 21, 2026

City CouncilTuesday, July 21, 2026
BodyTulsa, Oklahoma
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, July 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:33:01

Transcript — Verbatim
3:43

All right, good afternoon, and welcome to the City of Tulsa Border Justin Meeting Number One Three Eight Seven Eighty Swan O Four.

3:50

Let's call this meeting to order.

4:06

The chair will ask if the applicant is present and if there are protestants or interested parties.

4:17

Each party will be given time to speak not to exceed five minutes.

4:20

Please do not repeat comments of previous speakers.

4:23

After the board is heard from protestants or interested parties, the applicant may be allowed time for a rebuttal, not to exceed ten minutes.

4:30

If you wish to speak in support or opposition to a case, please sign in before speaking.

4:35

There's a sign-in sheet located at the front desk.

4:42

During the hearing, the board may ask questions of the applicant or interested parties at any time.

4:46

Staff reports for each application are available as PDFs on the Board of Adjustment web page at Tulsa Planning.

4:53

After the presentations, the board will vote to approve or deny the application.

4:57

If you are approved, staff will give you a copy of your case report following the hearing for your records.

5:02

You will need to submit this documentation to the permit center as a revision to your current permit application or include the documents with your submittal for a new permit application.

5:12

If you submitted your permit through the online portal, please submit revisions in the same manner.

5:16

When addressing the board, please state your name and address for the record and direct all comments into the microphone.

5:22

A video of these proceedings is being recorded for future airing on TGov Channel 24 Cable TV.

5:28

At this time, please silence any electronic devices.

5:31

And if there are no questions, Mr.

5:34

Chair.

5:35

All right, thank you, Nathan.

5:37

So let's move on to agenda item number one, which is the approval of the minutes of meeting 1386, July 7th, 2026.

5:45

Mr.

5:46

Chair, motion to approve the minutes from meeting 1386 on July 7th, 2026.

5:51

We got a motion.

5:52

Do we have a second second?

5:53

We got a motion, we got a second.

5:55

Ms.

5:55

Dumas?

5:56

Yes.

5:56

Mr.

5:57

Hill.

5:57

Yes.

5:57

Ms.

5:58

Stallfock?

5:58

Yes.

5:59

I'm going to upstain or what's not in the meeting.

6:01

So let's move on to agenda item number two, BOA 24069.

6:08

BOA 24069.

6:11

Location is 8621 South Memorial Drive.

6:14

Applicant 8.

6:20

And a special exception to increase the allowed fence height of four feet within the street setback.

6:26

Hi, good afternoon, Jesse Stringer, 8.1428 South New Haven Avenue.

6:32

Yes, so we are back.

6:45

This is a property that they inherited that at the time of purchase was already established as a church.

6:53

So they have been utilizing all the existing buildings and all the existing parking lot as is.

6:59

So since day one of purchase, they have been extremely limited on the amount of parking they have.

7:05

Right now they're drastically below even the required parking count from the day they purchased it.

7:11

Now the parking requirements are even a little bit more lenient, but still they they're barely meeting it.

7:16

So right now, um, with their proposal to put in a security fence, they would need to go around the existing parking lot and follow the already existing campus outline.

7:30

Unfortunately, a portion of that fence, which I've bubbled in red, would be within the statutory right-of-way.

7:37

The rest of the proposed security fence is within their property line, outside of the utility easement, and outside of the right-of-way.

7:44

But there is a decent chunk of the fence that would be within that right-of-way, which is in the uh ODOT's parcel.

7:55

We have contacted ODOT many months ago and let them know of this.

7:59

They have told us in writing that they have no problem with this.

8:02

As long as the city is okay with it, we could proceed forward with construction.

8:07

Um today we are asking for a variance based on the problem parcel that they have inherited.

8:15

This is just how it was constructed.

8:17

It was platted before a very large right-of-way even existed.

8:21

Um, so that's why the parking lot is so close to memorial, which you don't really find on a lot of properties in that area.

8:29

Um the main reason they're wanting to construct a security fence is they are having issues with folks wandering up on to campus.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning███████████████████████████████████35%
Signage██████████████████████████████████34%
Procedural██████████10%
Parking███████7%
Public Safety█████5%
Engineering And Infrastructure████4%
Housing███3%
Environmental Protection1%
Water And Wastewater Management1%
Summary of Proceedings

Tulsa Board of Adjustment Meeting 1387 – July 21, 2026

The Board of Adjustment met on July 21, 2026, to consider seven agenda items involving fence height variances, a special exception for a fleet fuel facility, signage variances, a driveway width exception, a manufactured home permit, and a sign height variance. The board approved the minutes of the previous meeting and voted on each case, with mixed outcomes on two items.

Approval of Minutes

  • The board unanimously approved the minutes of meeting 1386 held on July 7, 2026.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • BOA 24069 (Regent School fence): The applicant (Jesse Stringer) explained that the school inherited a property with a parking lot too close to Memorial Drive, requiring a fence within the right-of-way for security. No public speakers appeared in opposition or support.
  • BOA 24070 (Fleet fuel facility): The applicant (Mike Scarborough) stated that the facility would generate only 10–12% of the traffic of a typical convenience store. No public speakers appeared; two neighbors expressed support via phone and in person at the previous hearing.
  • BOA 24072 (Cherry Street signs): The applicant (Joel Slaughter) described two blade signs perpendicular to the building, one on 15th Street and one on Rockford, both encroaching into the planned right-of-way. No public speakers appeared.
  • BOA 24073 (Driveway width): The applicant (James Walker) explained that the driveway expansion was completed before he purchased the property and that 23 neighboring households submitted letters of support. One letter of opposition regarding drainage was received. Molly Cooley, a neighbor, spoke in support.
  • BOA 24074 (Credit union signage): The applicant (Lori Worthington) requested a pylon sign to improve visibility, noting that the building is set far back from the road. No public speakers appeared.
  • BOA 24075 (Manufactured home): The applicant (Berseta Medina) stated she wanted to place a new manufactured home on a lot she bought in 2024, seven minutes from her job. No public speakers appeared.
  • BOA 24076 (Maverick sign height): The applicant (Casey Swallem) requested a 60-foot sign to compete with nearby signs and overcome the site’s elevation below I-44. No public speakers appeared. Additional exhibits (flag study photos) were submitted during the meeting.

Discussion Items

  • BOA 24069 – Fence height and variance: The board discussed the proposed fence alignment. Mr. Hill expressed concern about placing the fence along Memorial Drive, but Ms. Stoffer and Ms. Dumas supported the request, citing ODOT’s lack of objection and the security need after a machete incident. The board voted separately on the special exception and the variance.
  • BOA 24070 – Fleet fuel facility: Board members noted the surrounding automotive uses and the low traffic impact. Ms. Dumas raised concerns about ground contamination, but the applicant described modern double-walled tanks with sensors. The board was satisfied.
  • BOA 24072 – Signs in right-of-way: The board confirmed that only the two blade signs were in question, and staff clarified that the sign over the entrance was within the property line. All members agreed that such signs are common in urban districts like Cherry Street.
  • BOA 24073 – Driveway width: The board noted the minimal relief (31 ft 8 in vs. 30 ft) and the lack of neighbor opposition regarding the driveway itself. The drainage concern was deemed unrelated to the driveway.
  • BOA 24074 – Credit union signage: The board discussed the number of existing signs (three) and the request for a fourth. The applicant offered to remove one sign. The board decided to approve a variance from two to three signs, allowing the applicant to choose which to remove.
  • BOA 24075 – Manufactured home: Mr. Hill opposed, stating that manufactured homes are not appropriate in neighborhoods with few such homes. Ms. Dumas and Ms. Stoffer supported the request, noting the new unit’s quality and the lack of neighbor objections.
  • BOA 24076 – Sign height: The board reviewed the additional flag study images showing the 60-foot sign’s visibility from I-44. Members noted the unique elevation and intersection configuration. Ms. Dumas commented that the height increase was not self-imposed and was the minimum needed.

Key Outcomes

  • BOA 24069 – Regent School fence: Special exception approved (4-0); variance approved (3-1, with Mr. Hill dissenting). The special exception permits a fence height of 6 feet in the street setback; the variance permits the fence within the street right-of-way.
  • BOA 24070 – Fleet fuel facility: Special exception approved (4-0) to allow commercial vehicle repair and maintenance use in the CS district.
  • BOA 24072 – Cherry Street signs: Special exception approved (4-0) to permit two blade signs in the right-of-way.
  • BOA 24073 – Driveway width: Special exception approved (4-0) to increase driveway width from 30 feet to 31 feet 8 inches in the RS3 district.
  • BOA 24074 – Credit union signage: Variance approved (4-0) to increase the number of permitted signs along the street frontage from two to three in the OM district.
  • BOA 24075 – Manufactured home: Special exception approved (3-1, with Mr. Hill dissenting) to permit a manufactured housing unit in the RS3 district.
  • BOA 24076 – Maverick sign height: Variance approved (4-0) to increase the permitted freestanding sign height from 40 feet to 60 feet in the CS district, based on the conceptual plans and additional exhibits.

Meeting Transcript

All right, good afternoon, and welcome to the City of Tulsa Border Justin Meeting Number One Three Eight Seven Eighty Swan O Four. Let's call this meeting to order. The chair will ask if the applicant is present and if there are protestants or interested parties. Each party will be given time to speak not to exceed five minutes. Please do not repeat comments of previous speakers. After the board is heard from protestants or interested parties, the applicant may be allowed time for a rebuttal, not to exceed ten minutes. If you wish to speak in support or opposition to a case, please sign in before speaking. There's a sign-in sheet located at the front desk. During the hearing, the board may ask questions of the applicant or interested parties at any time. Staff reports for each application are available as PDFs on the Board of Adjustment web page at Tulsa Planning. After the presentations, the board will vote to approve or deny the application. If you are approved, staff will give you a copy of your case report following the hearing for your records. You will need to submit this documentation to the permit center as a revision to your current permit application or include the documents with your submittal for a new permit application. If you submitted your permit through the online portal, please submit revisions in the same manner. When addressing the board, please state your name and address for the record and direct all comments into the microphone. A video of these proceedings is being recorded for future airing on TGov Channel 24 Cable TV. At this time, please silence any electronic devices. And if there are no questions, Mr. Chair. All right, thank you, Nathan. So let's move on to agenda item number one, which is the approval of the minutes of meeting 1386, July 7th, 2026. Mr. Chair, motion to approve the minutes from meeting 1386 on July 7th, 2026. We got a motion. Do we have a second second? We got a motion, we got a second. Ms. Dumas? Yes. Mr. Hill. Yes. Ms. Stallfock? Yes. I'm going to upstain or what's not in the meeting. So let's move on to agenda item number two, BOA 24069. BOA 24069. Location is 8621 South Memorial Drive. Applicant 8. And a special exception to increase the allowed fence height of four feet within the street setback. Hi, good afternoon, Jesse Stringer, 8.1428 South New Haven Avenue. Yes, so we are back. This is a property that they inherited that at the time of purchase was already established as a church. So they have been utilizing all the existing buildings and all the existing parking lot as is. So since day one of purchase, they have been extremely limited on the amount of parking they have. Right now they're drastically below even the required parking count from the day they purchased it. Now the parking requirements are even a little bit more lenient, but still they they're barely meeting it. So right now, um, with their proposal to put in a security fence, they would need to go around the existing parking lot and follow the already existing campus outline. Unfortunately, a portion of that fence, which I've bubbled in red, would be within the statutory right-of-way.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com