OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Tuscaloosa City Council Meeting Summary - November 4, 2025

City Council MeetingsTuesday, November 4, 2025
BodyTuscaloosa, Alabama
SessionCity Council Meetings
DateTuesday, November 4, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 37:46

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Motion.

0:01

Second.

0:02

All in favor say aye.

0:04

Aye.

0:04

Okay.

0:05

Minutes are adopted.

0:08

Item number one under old business.

0:11

Authorization of budget amendments.

0:14

For the department of public safety tabled on 930 25.

0:18

Mayor Maddox.

0:19

Ms.

0:19

Herbert and Ms.

0:20

Stanbridge.

0:21

Yes, sir.

0:22

And I'm gonna let uh Miss Herbert and Ms.

0:24

Standridge go through the specifics of the budget amendment.

0:27

But I passed out to each of you a memorandum that I want to prepare for today because I assumed that there would likely be a discussion just beyond the budget amendment itself.

0:41

So 130 days ago, I notified the city council in writing that my goal was to create an executive director of public safety.

0:50

The foundation of this recommendation is something I think we all believe in, whether we've agreed or disagreed along this journey that we want to make Tuscaloosa safer, and that if there is a crime fire medical response or even an act of mother nature or terrorism, then our response will be swift.

1:10

I don't disagree that any of us don't believe that.

1:15

We all are in alignment.

1:18

This recommendation since June 27th has been vetted both formally and informally and has been adopted by the public safety committee and the administration and policy committee, has also gone through one vote of the city council.

1:32

Um the recommendation that we have made is cost neutral, doesn't increase our fiscal 26 budget, and the recommendation that you see today is a reflection of months of discussion with each and every one of you.

1:49

So hopefully today's recommendation fits what I believe has been the concerns of several city council members.

1:59

Um I know there has been some concern about the amount of this being vetted, and so what I wanted to provide to each and every one of you is just my correspondence and a couple of other significant correspondence since June 27th.

2:16

Um whether we agree or disagree, it's my goal to provide you as much information that I have access to so that this council can make a good decision and debate it and then determine if it's necessary.

2:32

So at this time I'm gonna ask Ms.

2:34

Herbert and the standards to walk you through the budget amendment, an overview of it from 40,000 feet before they go into details is one of the concerns that has been and probably the primary concern as it relates to the budget amendment, has been overtime.

2:52

So as you will see in the budget amendment, we have limited the overtime in the case that someone who is a police or current police officer or firefighter, a sworn officer is selected to that position.

3:05

Um, and it's in your packet, you will see the proposed legislation that will allow this position eventually to be exempt under the local law that requires that sworn police officers and sworn firefighters earn over time.

3:23

Um again, that's been a process of the very productive discussions I've had with many of you, and it is reflected in the overall spreadsheet.

3:33

So I don't know if Ms.

3:34

Standridge or Ms.

3:34

Herbert are going to present, so I'll let them present this to you.

3:38

It's a single sheet that we send it out to them.

3:42

So Miss Standard.

3:43

Yes.

3:44

Um the sheet that you see in front of you with all of the details for um financing for the position is not should not be foreign.

3:53

I think that we handed this out at the end of September when we first started talking about the position and how to fund it.

3:58

Um the only change from that original document will be the overtime amount that the mayor mentioned has been decreased.

4:05

I think previously it was at 30,000.

4:08

We have since decreased it to 10,000 as shown on the um page in front of you.

4:12

And because of that um lowered overtime rate, we were able to uh functionally adjust the offsets for it, and so I do want to go through the offsets as there is.

4:26

Lower overtime amount.

4:28

Okay.

4:29

Um, and so I do want to go over the uh individual offsets for the ways to to fund this position.

4:36

The first one on the list is going to be to utilize the ambulance franchise revenue.

4:40

Um, this is the one that was adjusted because over time was decreased.

4:45

Previous to now, we had two different positions that we were gonna try to offset their um their salaries and benefits amount with the ambulance franchise revenue.

4:55

So because of the lowered overtime, we're only requesting one offset, and that is for the EMS prevention coordinator.

5:02

That total amount um would be about $83,791.

5:07

And so we would recognize the ambulance franchise revenue and then also increase salary amount for this position.

5:15

The other two items that we're proposing to use to fund the position is to eliminate two vacant um two vacant positions that are currently in TPD.

5:25

The first one is an auxiliary officer position.

5:28

Um that total amount would be the 60,000 one sixty-five, and then in a vacant police patrol officer position that would total about 115,000 dollars.

5:38

Um those two positions have been vacant for over a year, and the and when it comes to the uh ability to be able to fund the position, that one, those who are already in TPD, and so really just taking them off the board is all we would need to do for funding.

5:55

Um this really will the the net effect of all of these changes would leave about 23,315 dollars available.

6:04

Um whether or not that goes back into contingency within the general fund or stays within the salary line item within TPD to be possibly utilized later is is up to the council to decide.

6:15

Um below you will see equipment uh one-time costs needed for the position, and that is really just going to be uh proposed to be paid for out of salary savings, which the uh police department has um available, and we can transfer that to their equipment line.

6:34

I'm willing to answer any questions.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Safety█████████████████████████████████████████████47%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████████████████████████29%
Budget Equity Analysis████████████████████21%
Parks and Recreation███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Tuscaloosa City Council Meeting Summary - November 4, 2025

The Tuscaloosa City Council convened on November 4, 2025, to address five primary agenda items ranging from public safety personnel restructuring to infrastructure funding and grant applications. The meeting featured significant debate regarding the creation of a Director of Public Safety position, including concerns over overtime costs, legislative hurdles, and public pension implications. The council unanimously approved budget amendments, funding transfers for Northridge High School, and bond authorizations for the MLK Jr. Boulevard project, alongside a grant application for police canines.

Consent Calendar

  • Adoption of the minutes from the previous meeting (9/30/25).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • A constituent and soccer parent spoke in support of Councilman Crow's request, emphasizing the growth of soccer and the need for improved athletic facilities at city high schools to foster student time management and character.

Discussion Items

  • Authorization of Budget Amendments (Public Safety Director):
    • Mayor Maddox presented a recommendation to create an Executive Director of Public Safety, noting the goal is to create a swift emergency response. He highlighted that the recommendation is cost-neutral for Fiscal Year 26.
    • Ms. Herbert and Ms. Standridge detailed the funding offsets: utilizing approximately $83,791 in ambulance franchise revenue (specifically for the EMS Prevention Coordinator), and eliminating two vacant positions (an Auxiliary Officer and a Police Patrol Officer) totaling approximately $175,000 combined. A $10,000 cap was established for overtime in the current budget.
    • Councilman Crow questioned the overtime structure, noting that if the position remains non-exempt due to the lack of a passed local bill, the $10,000 cap may be insufficient. He requested clarification on whether the position could be reclassified to exempt immediately if the local bill fails.
    • The administration clarified that if the local bill allowing sworn officers to be exempt does not pass, the position will remain overtime-eligible, and the council would need to return for a budget revision to cover actual overtime costs beyond the $10,000 estimate.
    • Councilman Crow raised concerns regarding the job description requiring sworn status. Ms. Herbert and the Mayor explained that maintaining sworn status is necessary to allow current police or fire personnel to transfer their existing years of service into the Retirement System of Alabama (RSA) without cashing out their pensions; removing the sworn requirement would disenfranchise internal applicants regarding their pension benefits.
    • The discussion concluded with the understanding that if the local bill fails, a future budget revision will be necessary.
  • District Two Funding Request (Northridge High School):
    • Councilman Crow requested to transfer $25,000 from remaining surplus funds (originally allocated for district infrastructure three years ago) to fund a public-private partnership for a new soccer field at Northridge High School.
    • Ms. Herbert confirmed the funds are legitimate surplus funds from a general surplus transfer and that there are no restrictions preventing their reallocation from infrastructure to school support.
  • Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement (MLK Jr. Blvd. Phase 3):
    • Ms. Standridge and Mr. Holmes presented the amendment to the joint funding agreement with the Tuscaloosa County Road Improvement Commission (TCRIC) for the third phase of the MLK Jr. Blvd/Jack Warner Parkway project.
    • The total project cost is estimated at $84 million, with the third phase costing approximately $48 million. A new bond issuance of approximately $40 million is proposed (with a max cap of $45 million to cover potential bid overruns).
    • Mr. Holmes outlined the timeline: bidding to open in mid-to-late March, bonds to be sold in mid-March, and construction to begin early summer. He warned that the timeline is complex due to the need to align bid openings with TCRIC meetings to avoid re- validating the agreement if costs exceed current estimates.
  • Approval of Preliminary Bond Ordinance (MLK Jr. Blvd.):
    • The council discussed the preliminary ordinance required to authorize the bond issuance of up to $45 million, pending final bid amounts.
  • Authorization to Submit Grant Application:
    • Chief Blankley requested authorization to submit a "Bulletproof Investment" grant application to purchase ballistic vests for five police canines.

Key Outcomes

  • Budget Amendments: Approved unanimously (Aye). The Mayor's motion to amend the budget to fund the Director of Public Safety position passed, authorizing the offsets and limiting overtime to $10,000 for the current fiscal year with the understanding of potential future revision.
  • Northridge High School Funding: Approved unanimously (Aye). Councilman Crow's request to re-route $25,000 to the High School soccer field project was approved.
  • MLK Jr. Blvd. Funding Agreement: Item 3 (Amendment to Joint Funding Agreement) approved unanimously (Aye).
  • Bond Ordinance: Item 4 (Preliminary Bond Ordinance for 2026) approved unanimously (Aye).
  • Grant Application: Item 5 (Police Canine Vests) approved unanimously (Aye).
  • Adjournment: The meeting concluded, and the council moved to adjourn.

Meeting Transcript

Motion. Second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Okay. Minutes are adopted. Item number one under old business. Authorization of budget amendments. For the department of public safety tabled on 930 25. Mayor Maddox. Ms. Herbert and Ms. Stanbridge. Yes, sir. And I'm gonna let uh Miss Herbert and Ms. Standridge go through the specifics of the budget amendment. But I passed out to each of you a memorandum that I want to prepare for today because I assumed that there would likely be a discussion just beyond the budget amendment itself. So 130 days ago, I notified the city council in writing that my goal was to create an executive director of public safety. The foundation of this recommendation is something I think we all believe in, whether we've agreed or disagreed along this journey that we want to make Tuscaloosa safer, and that if there is a crime fire medical response or even an act of mother nature or terrorism, then our response will be swift. I don't disagree that any of us don't believe that. We all are in alignment. This recommendation since June 27th has been vetted both formally and informally and has been adopted by the public safety committee and the administration and policy committee, has also gone through one vote of the city council. Um the recommendation that we have made is cost neutral, doesn't increase our fiscal 26 budget, and the recommendation that you see today is a reflection of months of discussion with each and every one of you. So hopefully today's recommendation fits what I believe has been the concerns of several city council members. Um I know there has been some concern about the amount of this being vetted, and so what I wanted to provide to each and every one of you is just my correspondence and a couple of other significant correspondence since June 27th. Um whether we agree or disagree, it's my goal to provide you as much information that I have access to so that this council can make a good decision and debate it and then determine if it's necessary. So at this time I'm gonna ask Ms. Herbert and the standards to walk you through the budget amendment, an overview of it from 40,000 feet before they go into details is one of the concerns that has been and probably the primary concern as it relates to the budget amendment, has been overtime. So as you will see in the budget amendment, we have limited the overtime in the case that someone who is a police or current police officer or firefighter, a sworn officer is selected to that position. Um, and it's in your packet, you will see the proposed legislation that will allow this position eventually to be exempt under the local law that requires that sworn police officers and sworn firefighters earn over time. Um again, that's been a process of the very productive discussions I've had with many of you, and it is reflected in the overall spreadsheet. So I don't know if Ms. Standridge or Ms. Herbert are going to present, so I'll let them present this to you. It's a single sheet that we send it out to them. So Miss Standard. Yes. Um the sheet that you see in front of you with all of the details for um financing for the position is not should not be foreign. I think that we handed this out at the end of September when we first started talking about the position and how to fund it. Um the only change from that original document will be the overtime amount that the mayor mentioned has been decreased. I think previously it was at 30,000. We have since decreased it to 10,000 as shown on the um page in front of you. And because of that um lowered overtime rate, we were able to uh functionally adjust the offsets for it, and so I do want to go through the offsets as there is. Lower overtime amount. Okay. Um, and so I do want to go over the uh individual offsets for the ways to to fund this position. The first one on the list is going to be to utilize the ambulance franchise revenue. Um, this is the one that was adjusted because over time was decreased. Previous to now, we had two different positions that we were gonna try to offset their um their salaries and benefits amount with the ambulance franchise revenue. So because of the lowered overtime, we're only requesting one offset, and that is for the EMS prevention coordinator.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com