The Tuscaloosa City Council convened on November 18, 2025, to review and approve a wide range of municipal contracts, including construction change orders, professional services agreements, and property lease amendments. The meeting featured detailed presentations from city staff regarding capital improvements for the Fletcher Wastewater Treatment Plant, infrastructure upgrades, and safety initiatives for first responders. All items were discussed, with no public testimony or opposition recorded, and every motion passed unanimously.
To approve. So move. Move. Second in any discussion. All in favor say aye. Aye. Minutes are approved. Item number one is approval change order number two with Mark Johnson construction. For the Fletcher phase two improvements project, the total is 943, 883, and an additional 304 days. Brian, welcome. Hey, good afternoon. Good afternoon. So I'm gonna walk through some of the history and how we got here. Um as a reminder, this the phase two project at the Fletcher plant is to rehab the digesters and to rehab the aeration basis. So the aeration basins are done, that's that's complete. Uh the remaining scope is to replace the lids on digesters one and two. Um the change order that we're asking for will add digester three back into the project. And I'll explain that. But so about this time last year, we took third digester out of the project to cover the cost of lid uh replacements for digesters one and two during construction. Once we had the sludge removed from those digesters, we had in the constructor project to inspect the lids because we couldn't do it outside construction. We did the inspection showed that the lids needed replacing. So that time the decision was made to pull digester three out to help cover the cost of the lid replacement for digesters one and two. You with me? Okay. So for reluctant for uh so there is an accompanying finance committee item for to transfer monies from the wastewater lagoon project to Commodore Changer. Uh the this time last year, since then we've done a study for that project on the lagoons. Um the intent of the city was to determine the scope for improvements and correct preliminary cost estimates. Uh and it so a component of those improvements is restoring some of the lagoon capacity by sludge removal. Um the study indicated we could restore eight to ten years of capacity within the proposed modified budget. So, in other words, we take what we're proposing 943,000 dollars from the lagoon project. We still can remove the amount of sludge we need to to restore 10 years worth of capacity and do the other components of that project we want to do. Um and then another note is that the digesters and the lagoons are they're interconnected systems, so the lagoons basically serve as an overflow for sludge that can't be processed by the plant. Um, or if the solids facilities overload it, so restoration of the third digester will help to reduce the transfer of sods to the lagoon and reduce the amount of capacity needed for the lagoon to be restored. So any questions? You understand all that? I do that's good. Remember how the athlete done went basically at the time when we established the review budget. How much did they originally for the cost? Yes. Five million five the six million dollars of that budget through two sources. So six million dollars is the answer to your question. So at that time we didn't have this study. We so now we're increasing that another million nine forty. Uh I was talking about the legume project. Okay. That we're taking money from so for that project. We had six million dollars. Since then, we've done a study. The study shows that we have enough money to remove sludge, restore it. There's other components of that project we can do as well.