Virginia Beach City Council Meeting - September 3, 2025
Virginia Beach City Council Meeting - September 3, 2025
The City Council convened on September 3, 2025, for a work session followed by a formal meeting. The work session featured a briefing from Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) on its System Optimization Plan (SOP) and an update on pending planning items. The formal session included the consent agenda, appointments, and ceremonial recognitions.
Consent Calendar
- Approved ordinance amending Section 35-64 of the City Code regarding prerequisites for the elderly and disabled tax relief program.
- Approved resolution designating August 31 each year as International Overdose Awareness Day.
- Approved resolution naming 31st Street Park as the William D. Sessums Jr. Neptune Park (Councilmember Rouse voted no).
- Approved ordinance authorizing city staff support for the Timberland Dedication Day celebration at Salem High School.
- Approved ordinance deeming city-owned property at 333 Laskin Road as excess and authorizing its sale, deferred to October 21, 2025.
- Approved resolution to participate in the proposed settlement of opioid-related claims.
- Approved resolutions for revenue sharing projects (Cleveland Street Improvements, Holland Road Phase 1, Independence Boulevard/Edwin Drive intersection).
- Approved multiple encroachment ordinances (Lake Wesley, Virginia Dare Drive, Ocean Front Avenue/63rd Street).
- Accepted and appropriated various grants and fund transfers for public works, human services, information technology, police, emergency medical services, and the clerk of circuit court.
Discussion Items
- HRT System Optimization Plan Briefing: Ray Amaruso, Chief Planning and Development Officer for HRT, presented the SOP, which aims to reallocate resources from low-performing bus routes to high-demand routes due to an ongoing operator shortage. Proposed changes in Virginia Beach include eliminating Route 22 and Route 26, replacing them with microtransit zones, and adjusting alignments on Routes 24, 27, 29, 33, and 36. Two additional microtransit zones were proposed. Councilmembers expressed support for the approach and asked about military base connections, TCC coordination, and fare impacts. No vote was taken; the briefing was for input.
- Planning Update for September 16 Agenda: Planning Administrator Caitlin Alcock reviewed 11 items scheduled for the September 16 council meeting, including:
- Subdivision variance at 970 Whitehurst Landing Road (recommended approval, unanimous).
- Change in non-conformity for a BP sign at 1689 Laskin Road (recommended approval).
- Change in non-conformity for a dwelling addition at 311 35th Street (recommended approval).
- Modification of proffers for 375 multifamily units at 1276 Baker Road (deferred from August 12; applicant added 7% attainable housing commitment for 10 years; recommended approval).
- Alternative compliance for a Funnybone sign at Pembroke Mall (recommended approval).
- Three short-term rental conditional use permits (213 4th Street, 423 21st Street, 304 28th Street Unit 206) — all recommended approval, with some prior complaints that were unsubstantiated or resolved.
- Text amendment to Western Campus Overlay District building form standards (allowing 10-foot minimum ground floor height for residential; recommended approval).
- Text amendment to floodplain ordinance (administrative variances for functionally dependent uses; clarifying appeal and grandfathering; recommended approval).
- Appeal of Historical Review Board denial of a certificate of appropriateness for a vinyl privacy fence at Northlanding Estates subdivision. The fence had been installed without approval; HRB denied the after-the-fact request. Council discussed the issue; no action taken as the item was deferred to the September 16 agenda.
Key Outcomes
- The consent agenda was approved by an 11-0 vote (Councilmember Ross Hammond voting remotely).
- Council appointments were approved: reappointment of Brandon Horsley (Agriculture Advisory Commission), John David (Board of Building Zone Appeals), Eric Keplinger (Development Appeals), Clinton Mills (Parks and Recreation Commission); appointment of Sarah Cully (Health Service Advisory Board), Kimberly Denton (Housing Advisory Board), Ogu Emma Juru, Carla Gregory, and Cavela Molineau (Minority Business Council), Lauren Bland (Open Space Advisory Committee), James Yost (Personnel Board), Dorcas Hellfant Browning (Resort Advisory Commission).
- The closed session was certified by a 10-0 vote (Councilmember Ross Hammond abstained).
- Minutes of August 12 and August 19, 2025 meetings were approved 11-0.
- The formal meeting included a ceremonial presentation for Zero Waste Awareness Week and the naming of 31st Street Park.
Meeting Transcript
Hope everybody had a nice restful Labor Day weekend. I'll tell you what, the weather couldn't have got better. Thank you. And welcome. We need some rain now. Okay. Okay. The former needs rain. Okay. Well, since I get blamed for the weather, I'll say we're going to do all right. If we could go ahead and get rolling. So this is the council. At this time, we'll be joined by our colleagues with Hampton Roads Transit. We'll be joined by Ray Amaruso, the Chief Planning and Development Officer for Hampton Roads. Welcome, Ray. How are you doing? Thank you, Mayor, for that warm welcome and good afternoon, members of council city manager. It's nice to be back again. I'm here today to talk about our system optimization plan, which actually is something we're very excited about. To share with you, we're we'll be doing this for the six member cities that we serve. Your city council is the first one. Um is talk about an effort that uh I believe um is extremely important for the future transit in this region. So the system optimization plan, by its very nature, is looking how HRT can put its limited resources to the best use by reducing low ridership local bus service and reinvesting those savings in routes with high ridership demand. Why is that important? You have heard before how we are struggling as many transit properties throughout the country in getting enough bus operators to operate the 68 bus routes that we put out on the street every day. We simply just don't have enough. So when I talk about limited resources, is not just typically you put in the uh characteristic of financial resources, but it's also human resources. Uh why is the SOP needed? A really good question. Um, as you all may recall, we get funding through a variety of sources, but our biggest funders, in addition to the six member cities, uh the federal government that helps pay for operating costs and capital costs, and the state government, the Commonwealth of Virginia. And uh they award funding very much so the state by uh looking at productivities of bus routes and how many people they carry on an hourly basis or per trip basis. So the goal of the SOP is to increase ridership by putting service where it's most needed, not must needed. Sorry for that typo. Improving reliability by having enough operators to support the schedules that we put out and the number of routes we put out. And therefore, the net effect of that is reducing costs for the local member jurisdictions by making the system more efficient. So a little bit of background and context of the system optimization plan. We have an ongoing operator shortage that pretty much manifested itself at the start of the pandemic. And we've been struggling like a lot of transit properties around the country. We're currently short about on any given day of the week, 50 bus operators to get back to pre-pandemic 2019 service levels on Southside routes to fully implement our regional transit or RTS network. On top of that, we need another 45 bus operators. For those who may not recall, the regional transit service network, the uh high frequency backbone routes is something that was identified in the legislation passed by the General Assembly back in 2020 to deliver 13 regional backbone routes that serve all six cities with 15-minute high frequency service with a consistent span of the service week and the service day. Doesn't worry about uh what city pays for what. Um, but then needs to deliver 15-minute service, you need more operators for that. HRT needs to match its service to its resources, plain and simple. The lack of bus operators means we cannot reliably put out on the street all the trips that we publish for our customers because of the ongoing shortage of operators. Right sizing the network, the local bus network means our HRT can keep its compact with its customers and not miss trips due to the fact we are lacking bus operators. Again, we're not alone in this. This is happening all over the country. Everyone's experiencing bus operator shortfalls. We've talked about microtransit or demand responsive service in the past.
openpublica.com