OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Washoe County Planning Commission and CIAC Meeting - April 7, 2026

Meeting PortalTuesday, April 7, 2026
BodyWashoe County, Nevada
SessionMeeting Portal
DateTuesday, April 7, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:36:14

Transcript — Verbatim
0:05

Recording in progress.

0:13

Good evening.

0:14

It is Tuesday, April 7th at 6 p.m.

0:17

I'm going to exercise a little discretion here and call to order the Washer County Capital Improvements Advisory Committee first thing.

0:29

And then we'll be able to excuse our member from that.

0:33

And then we'll convene the county planning commission.

0:35

So could we have a determination of quorum?

0:40

Mike Flick.

0:42

Mindic Kennedy.

0:43

Here.

0:44

Kate Nelson.

0:46

Here.

0:46

Amy Owens.

0:48

Present.

0:49

Dan Vazareschi.

0:50

Here.

0:51

Matthew Robison.

0:54

Jim Barnes here.

0:56

Rob Pierce.

0:57

President.

0:57

We have a quorum.

0:59

Thank you.

1:00

Would you please join me in the Pledge of Allegiance?

1:23

Thank you.

1:25

We're opening the hearing now.

1:27

Do we have any public comment on the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee?

1:34

No public comment in chambers, no public comment on Zoom.

1:39

All right, then we have one hearing.

1:45

Do we have that presentation for the regional road impact fee?

1:52

Mr.

1:52

Chair, if it's okay, I'll read it into the record.

1:55

Okay.

1:55

Okay, this item uh recommendation to the Washoe County Board of County Commissioners to adopt the eighth edition of the regional road impact fee, the general administration manual, the eighth edition of the capital improvement program, and the revised fees for review discussion and possible action pursuant to NRS 278B 150 and Washoe County Code Section 11070605 to recommend approval to the Washoe County Board of County Commissioners of amendments uh to the regional road impact fee general administrative manual and the RIF Capital Improvement Plan with revised fees.

2:33

And uh let's see representing Washoe County in this matter is uh senior engineer Michaan Reed.

2:41

Good evening, everyone.

2:43

Um so Jeff Wilbert from RTC is gonna give a presentation about the regional road impact fee eighth edition update.

2:49

And I'll do that now.

2:52

All right, thank you very much.

2:54

Oops sorry about that.

2:55

My name is Jeff Wilbricht, I'm a engineering manager at RTC.

2:58

I help administer the RIF program for um our community.

3:02

So to kind of kick us off, um talk about why we're doing this effort and what really impact fees are.

3:11

So to kind of introduce it kind of on an easy level, it's a funding tool that we use to add capacity to our roadway network uh when new um development occurs.

3:22

Um it's really intended so when new development creates additional demands on um public facilities provided by local governments like roads or water or sewer facilities.

3:31

If those capacity uh if the capacity of those facilities is not increased to satisfy that new demand, um the quality of service will be degraded.

3:39

So this is identified as a funding tool to allow new development to kind of help pay their share.

3:48

The program has a couple advantages and a couple limitations.

3:51

Um it's advantage, like I said earlier, it allows development to pay its fair share, and really it's but it's viewed as an equitable system and it's been supported by the community.

3:59

The program itself has been in place since roughly the mid-90s.

4:03

Um, so it's a kind of a long-standing program that our community is very familiar with.

4:06

It does have a couple limitations.

4:09

Those fees that are collected that cannot be used for the operating cost of any of those facilities.

4:13

So for the operation of the traffic signal, for example, we can't use um those monies to pay for the operation of that signal.

4:19

Similarly, maintenance expenses, so we can't use um RIF funds to pay for preventative maintenance of the roadway, and we can't use it for non-capacity related improvements.

4:28

So a bike um cycle track or something like that is we cannot use RIF money for those types of roadway improvements.

4:36

Uh the program itself is governed uh through NRS 278B.

4:40

Um, the local governments of Reno Sparks and Washoe County all have um their own ordinances that allow the inaction and um collection of impact fees, and then collectively as a group of RTC, City of Reno, City of Sparks, and Washoe County, we're all entered into a cooperative agreement that was executed back in the early 90s that allows the kind of joint operation of a RIF program.

5:01

And that's why I from RTC in here.

5:03

RTC was identified as kind of the administrator or the initiator of the program.

5:08

So local agencies collect the fees, they distribute into a pile, and I'll talk about kind of the service areas of how that is distributed to then develop and construct capacity improvements for a roadway network.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Housing Capacity████████████████████████24%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████████████████22%
Procedural█████████████13%
Transportation Safety████████████12%
Affordable Housing█████████9%
Regional Planning████████8%
Economic Development███████7%
Public Engagement███3%
Zoning Code Review██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Washoe County Planning Commission and Capital Improvements Advisory Committee Meeting - April 7, 2026

This combined meeting of the Washoe County Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) and the Planning Commission began at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 7, 2026. The CIAC convened first to recommend adoption of the 8th Edition of the Regional Road Impact Fee (RRIF), then the Planning Commission addressed a consent agenda item, two public hearings, and three development code amendments. All votes were unanimous unless otherwise noted.

Consent Calendar

  • WTM20-001 Ladera Ranch Extension of Time: The Planning Commission approved a two-year extension (to August 4, 2028) for recording the final map for phases 2–6 of the 294-lot subdivision. The item was pulled from the consent calendar for discussion; staff noted it is a routine one-time extension allowed by NRS 278.360. The motion carried unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Helen Neff (Incline Village resident): Commented on Item 9D, requesting explicit legal language to ensure the attainable housing density bonus does not apply within the Tahoe Basin due to unique environmental constraints and limited buildable land. She submitted written suggested language.
  • Pat Davison (District 5 resident): Spoke in support of both Items 9D and 9E, praising staff's analysis and urging approval of the housing incentive packages.
  • Craig (Zoom): Asked whether the 20-parcel subset in Item 9F could be developed or traded. Staff confirmed the proposal is to designate these parcels as open space and lock them as undevelopable.
  • Christine Gilbert (in chambers): Expressed relief that the SOI-released parcels would be designated open space, noting traffic concerns in the North Valleys.

Discussion Items

CIAC – Regional Road Impact Fee (RRIF) 8th Edition

Jeff Wilbricht (RTC Engineering Manager) presented the update to the RRIF General Administration Manual (GAM), Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and revised fees. Key points:

  • The total RIF share of needed improvements is approximately $149 million (up from $132 million in the 7th edition), split 60/40 between North and South benefit districts.
  • Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) growth decreased due to updated travel demand modeling, resulting in lower fees for single-family units and most other land uses.
  • Fees are based on ITE trip generation rates and national data; residential VMT data is local.
  • A business impact statement concluded the new fees do not impose a significant economic burden on businesses.
  • The update follows NRS 278B requirements and will be presented to Reno and Sparks before final adoption by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) in June 2026.
  • Commissioners questioned the use of national versus local statistics and the impact of reduced school busing on traffic. Staff responded that public schools are exempt from RIF collection, but the program uses standard traffic engineering guidelines.
  • Commissioner Pierce raised concerns about projects being removed from the RTP after developer assumptions; staff stated such changes do not materially affect the fee calculations.

CIAC Vote: Motion to recommend approval to the BCC passed unanimously.

Item 9B – WAB26-0002: 3565 Lone Tree Drainage Easement Abandonment

Planner Jolene Bertetto presented a request to abandon ~280 sq ft of a 50-foot-wide drainage easement to allow construction of a detached garage. A drainage analysis confirmed the channel can convey maximum flows with 0.5–1 foot of freeboard. The existing 20-foot channel operates independently of the Steamboat Ditch. Staff recommended approval. No public comment. Motion carried unanimously.

Item 9C – WSUP26-0001: Enterprise Rent-A-Car Special Use Permit

Carlos Perez Campbell (Enterprise representative) requested a special use permit for a rental car office inside an existing Caliber Collision shop at 155 Ingenuity Avenue, Spanish Springs. The operation would provide replacement vehicles to collision customers with minimal traffic impact (2–3 weekday trips). An open landscaping violation must be remedied before business license issuance. Neighborhood meeting had zero attendees. Staff recommended approval. Motion carried unanimously.

Item 9D – WDCA25-0006: Attainable Housing Density Bonus

Senior Planner Eric Young presented a code amendment to establish a density bonus for attainable (affordable) housing. Key features:

  • Tiers allow one-step density increases (e.g., MDS to HDS) without master plan or zoning amendments.
  • Targets income levels from <30% AMI to 150% AMI, with a new workforce housing tier (120–150% AMI).
  • Minimum affordability: 30 years for rental, 9 years for for-sale units (based on Nevada average home tenancy).
  • The bonus does not stack with other density bonuses.
  • Explicitly does not apply in the Tahoe Basin (zones not used there).
  • Staff found the approach more transparent than complex tiered systems used elsewhere.
  • Median home sale price remains $120,000 above what 150% AMI households can afford, but the bonus aims to narrow the gap.
  • Commissioner Pierce questioned whether investors could buy units; staff confirmed first sale and subsequent sales within 9 years must be to income-qualified homeowners.
  • Commissioner Flick expressed frustration that many approved projects are not built despite incentives; staff noted Ladera Ranch is making steady progress.

Public comment: Pat Davison supported, noting the nine-year deed restriction and potential for traffic reduction. Motion to recommend approval to the BCC carried unanimously.

Item 9E – WDCA26-0001: Small Unit Density Incentive

Planning Manager Kat Oakley presented a 25% density bonus for units ≤1,200 sq ft in suburban, urban, and commercial zones (outside Tahoe). Staff analysis compared traffic and building bulk of small-unit neighborhoods versus standard neighborhoods, finding lower impacts even with increased density. The incentive is voluntary and prohibits variances. Previously approved tentative maps must undergo new approval to use this incentive. Motion to initiate and recommend approval carried unanimously.

Item 9F – WMPA25-0003 / WRZA25-0004: Sphere of Influence (SOI) Open Space Designations

Senior Planner Eric Young presented three related actions:

  1. Master plan text amendments for conformance with the Truckee Meadows Regional Plan (scheduled updates and new policies for natural resource areas, trails, source water protection).
  2. Master plan map amendments to designate 40 publicly owned parcels (released from Reno's SOI) as Open Space.
  3. Regulatory zone amendments to apply Open Space zoning to 20 of those 40 parcels. All parcels have development constraints (slopes >15%, conservation targets). Staff noted public alarm initially (misinterpretation as selling federal land), but after clarification, no opposition. Motion for master plan amendment and motion for regulatory zone amendment both carried unanimously.

Key Outcomes

  • RRIF 8th Edition: CIAC recommended approval to the BCC (unanimous).
  • Ladera Ranch Extension: Two-year extension approved (unanimous).
  • 3565 Lone Tree Abandonment: Approved (unanimous).
  • Enterprise Rent-A-Car SUP: Approved with conditions (unanimous).
  • Attainable Housing Density Bonus: Recommended to BCC for adoption (unanimous).
  • Small Unit Density Incentive: Initiated and recommended to BCC (unanimous).
  • SOI Open Space Amendments: Both master plan and zoning amendments recommended to BCC (unanimous).
  • Report: The BCC on March 10, 2026, voted 3-2 to overturn the Planning Commission's decision on the Sierra Reflections tentative subdivision map.

The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:00 p.m. after the final motion.

Meeting Transcript

Recording in progress. Good evening. It is Tuesday, April 7th at 6 p.m. I'm going to exercise a little discretion here and call to order the Washer County Capital Improvements Advisory Committee first thing. And then we'll be able to excuse our member from that. And then we'll convene the county planning commission. So could we have a determination of quorum? Mike Flick. Mindic Kennedy. Here. Kate Nelson. Here. Amy Owens. Present. Dan Vazareschi. Here. Matthew Robison. Jim Barnes here. Rob Pierce. President. We have a quorum. Thank you. Would you please join me in the Pledge of Allegiance? Thank you. We're opening the hearing now. Do we have any public comment on the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee? No public comment in chambers, no public comment on Zoom. All right, then we have one hearing. Do we have that presentation for the regional road impact fee? Mr. Chair, if it's okay, I'll read it into the record. Okay. Okay, this item uh recommendation to the Washoe County Board of County Commissioners to adopt the eighth edition of the regional road impact fee, the general administration manual, the eighth edition of the capital improvement program, and the revised fees for review discussion and possible action pursuant to NRS 278B 150 and Washoe County Code Section 11070605 to recommend approval to the Washoe County Board of County Commissioners of amendments uh to the regional road impact fee general administrative manual and the RIF Capital Improvement Plan with revised fees. And uh let's see representing Washoe County in this matter is uh senior engineer Michaan Reed. Good evening, everyone. Um so Jeff Wilbert from RTC is gonna give a presentation about the regional road impact fee eighth edition update. And I'll do that now. All right, thank you very much. Oops sorry about that. My name is Jeff Wilbricht, I'm a engineering manager at RTC. I help administer the RIF program for um our community. So to kind of kick us off, um talk about why we're doing this effort and what really impact fees are. So to kind of introduce it kind of on an easy level, it's a funding tool that we use to add capacity to our roadway network uh when new um development occurs. Um it's really intended so when new development creates additional demands on um public facilities provided by local governments like roads or water or sewer facilities. If those capacity uh if the capacity of those facilities is not increased to satisfy that new demand, um the quality of service will be degraded. So this is identified as a funding tool to allow new development to kind of help pay their share. The program has a couple advantages and a couple limitations. Um it's advantage, like I said earlier, it allows development to pay its fair share, and really it's but it's viewed as an equitable system and it's been supported by the community. The program itself has been in place since roughly the mid-90s. Um, so it's a kind of a long-standing program that our community is very familiar with.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com