⬚ figure
AlexWest
SMALL AREA PLAN
Approved by City Council on November 16, 2024 Adopted by Ordinance #5565 on December 14, 2024
⬚ figure
Approved by City Council on November 16, 2024 Adopted by Ordinance #5565 on December 14, 2024
City Council Mayor Justin Wilson Vice Mayor Amy Jackson Councilman Canek Aguirre Councilmember Sarah Bagley Councilman John T. Chapman Councilwoman Alyia Gaskins Councilman R. Kirk McPike
Planning Commission David Brown Stephen Koenig Mindy Lyle Nathan Macek, Chair Jody Manor Melissa McMahon, Vice Chair Vivian Ramirez
City Manager’s Office James F. Parajon, City Manager Emily Baker, Deputy City Manager
City Attorney’s Office Cheran Ivery, City Attorney Christina Brown, Deputy City Attorney
Planning and Zoning Karl Moritz, Director Jeffrey Farner, Deputy Director Jared Alves, Urban Planner Cory Banacka, Urban Planner Carrie Beach, Division Chief Christian Brandt, Urban Planner Thomas Canfield, City Architect Katherine Carraway, Urban Planner Mary Christesen, Principal Planner Maya Contreras, Principal Planner William Cook, Urban Planner Margaret Cooper, Urban Planner José Delcid, Urban Planner Michael D’Orazio, Urban Planner Nathan Imm, Principal Planner Robert Kerns, Division Chief Tony LaColla, Division Chief Richard Lawrence, Principal Planner Andra Roventa Schmitt, Urban Planner Melissa Symmes, Urban Planner
Office of Housing Helen McIlvaine, Director Eric Keeler, Deputy Director Tamara Jovovic, Housing Program Manager Virginia Patton, Housing Program Manager Melodie Seau, Division Chief Kenneth Turscak, Housing Analyst
Recreation, Parks and Cultural Activities Jack Browand, Deputy Director Judy Lo, Principal Planner Ana Vicinanzo, Urban Planner Jose Carlos Ayala, Principal Planner Bethany Znidersic, Division Chief Meika Daus, Public Art Senior Manager
Transportation and Environmental Services Adriana Castañeda, Director Hillary Orr, Deputy Director Erin Bevis-Carver, Division Chief Megan Oleynik, Civil Engineer IV Ryan Knight, Division Chief Carson Lucarelli, Urban Planner Gavin Pellitteri, Principal Planner Daniel Scolese, Civil Engineer IV Christopher Ziemann, Division Chief
Office of Climate Action Valerie Amour, Energy Manager Ryan Freed, Climate Action Officer Dustin Smith, Green Building Manager
Alexandria Economic Development Partnership Stephanie Landrum, President & CEO Christina Mindrup, Vice President, Real Estate
Alexandria City Public Schools Sophie Huemer, Director of Capital Programs, Planning & Design
Virginia Housing The City gratefully acknowledges the financial support provided by Virginia Housing (VH) for the AlexWest Small Area Plan. A VH Community Impact Grant enabled six AlexWest community organizations to help enhance community engagement during the planning process. This collaboration, and the work of these community organizations, was essential to the City’s ability to reach marginalized and underrepresented communities. Special thanks to Mike Hawkins, Matthew Bolster, Chris Thompson, Ayan Addou, Carina DeRoché Henry, and John Payne.
VHDA-Supported Community Organizations African Communities Together ALIVE, Inc. Concerned Citizens Network of Alexandria Landmark Church Southern Towers United Tenants and Workers United
| Chapters | Page |
|---|---|
| 1 Maintaining Community........................... 5 | |
| 2 Inclusive Growth...................................... 11 | |
| 3 Housing Affordability............................. 25 | |
| 4 Mobility + Safety..................................... 33 | |
| 5 Public + Connected Open Spaces........... 49 | |
| 6 Sustainable + Healthy Communities....... 59 | |
| 7 Recommendations................................. 67 | |
| 8 Neighborhoods....................................... 73 | |
| 9 Implementation..................................... 127 | |
| A Appendix............................................... 135 |
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
| Figures | Page |
|---|---|
| 2.1 Existing Land Uses | 13 |
| 2.2 Land Use Strategy | 15 |
| 2.3 Land Uses | 17 |
| 2.4 Building Heights | 19 |
| 2.5 NVCC - Alexandria Campus | 23 |
| 3.1 Opportunities for Development Without Displacement | 29 |
| 4.1 Existing Street Network | 36 |
| 4.2 Street Network | 38 |
| 4.3 Street Dimensions + Types | 39 |
| 4.4 Street Dimensions + Types | 40 |
| 4.5 Street Dimensions + Types | 41 |
| 4.6 Pedestrian + Bike Network | 43 |
| 4.7 West End Transitway Route | 45 |
| 4.8 Southern Towers Enhanced Transit Facility | 46 |
| 4.9 Safety Enhancements Study Areas | 47 |
| 4.10 Seminary Road + N. Beauregard Street | 48 |
| 5.1 Open Space Existing Conditions | 52 |
| 5.2 Walking Distance to Parks + Open Space | 53 |
| 5.3 Parks + Open Space | 54 |
| 6.1 Existing Tree Canopy + Parking Lots | 63 |
| 8.0 Neighborhoods | 77 |
| 8.1A Gateway Neighborhood | 80 |
| 8.1B Gateway Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 81 |
| 8.2A Terrace Neighborhood | 84 |
| 8.2B Terrace Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 85 |
| 8.3A Jacobs Neighborhood | 88 |
| 8.3A Jacobs Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 89 |
| 8.4A Upland Park Neighborhood | 92 |
| 8.4B Upland Park Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 93 |
| 8.5A Crossroads Neighborhood | 96 |
| 8.5B Crossroads Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 97 |
| 8.6A Seminary Overlook Neighborhood | 100 |
| 8.6B Seminary Overlook Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 101 |
| 8.7A Central Core Neighborhood | 104 |
| 8.7B Central Core Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 105 |
| Figures | Page |
|---|---|
| 8.8A Adams Neighborhood | 108 |
| 8.8B Adams Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 109 |
| 8.9A Highland Neighborhood | 112 |
| 8.9B Highland Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 113 |
| 8.10A Garden Neighborhood | 116 |
| 8.10B Garden Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 117 |
| 8.11A Greenway Neighborhood | 120 |
| 8.11B Greenway Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 121 |
| 8.12A Union Neighborhood | 124 |
| 8.12B Union Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network | 125 |
| A.1 City Annexation Map | 138 |
| A.2 Existing Sanitary Sewershed | 148 |
| Tables | Page |
|---|---|
| 2.1 Focus Area Criteria | 14 |
| 2.2 Area 2 Criteria | 14 |
| 8.1 Gateway Neighborhood | 79 |
| 8.2 Terrace Neighborhood | 83 |
| 8.3 Jacobs Neighborhood | 87 |
| 8.4 Upland Park Neighborhood | 91 |
| 8.5 Crossroads Neighborhood | 95 |
| 8.6 Seminary Overlook Neighborhood | 99 |
| 8.7 Central Core Neighborhood | 103 |
| 8.8 Adams Neighborhood | 107 |
| 8.9 Highland Neighborhood | 111 |
| 8.10 Garden Neighborhood | 115 |
| 8.11 Greenway Neighborhood | 119 |
| 8.12 Union Neighborhood | 123 |
| 8.13 Development Table Notes | 125 |
| 9.1 Community Benefits + Funding Responsibility | 129 |
| 9.2 Prioritization of City- and Grant-funded Projects | 130 |
| 9.3 Implementation Rubric | 131 |
Alexandria West (AlexWest) is a mosaic of many communities, each abundant with their own histories and unique experiences. It is also one of the City’s most diverse areas, with residents and business owners from more than 70 countries speaking many different languages, and made up of many different cultures, races, and ethnicities. AlexWest’s community members also reflect a broad economic diversity, with a higher proportional share of low- to moderate-income households and renters as compared to other parts of the City. The AlexWest Plan builds on this community diversity and the social fabric that supports it.
⬚ figure
Inclusive Growth
⬚ figure
Mobility + Safety
⬚ figure
Sustainable + Healthy Communities
⬚ figure
Public + Connected Open Spaces
⬚ figure
Housing Affordability
⬚ figure
Neighborhoods
The AlexWest Plan area, at nearly 1,300 acres, is the largest in the City. The sheer magnitude of the area offers significant complexities, challenges, and opportunities represented in the wide array of neighborhoods. Though complex, the scale of the Plan area offers opportunities to view holistic solutions at a system-wide level. To begin to address the challenges and goals identified by the community, the Plan integrates a long-term land use strategy with a comprehensive anti-displacement and housing policy framework that strives to retain existing residents and the community and culture of AlexWest, while achieving new community benefits for all. With the community's input, the Plan further prioritizes key improvements that help to stitch neighborhoods together, such as integrated mobility and open space networks.
A core element of the land use strategy, which will facilitate many of the objectives outlined in the following chapters, is the prioritization of new residential development on surface parking lots and in underutilized commercial and office space. This new development will take pressure off existing market affordable housing and at the same time create new committed affordable housing and obtain important new community benefits, such as easy and equitable access to transit, open space, and community amenities like neighborhood-serving retail. An inclusive and flexible approach to land use and growth will help maintain critical social infrastructure and support overall affordability for residents.
Without a proactive Plan, few new affordable housing units will be produced, existing market affordable units will become less affordable, and some AlexWest community members may be pushed out of the neighborhood. Existing residents will continue to lack access to meaningful open spaces and parks and necessary neighborhood services. Residents will be less well connected to the rest of Alexandria and the surrounding municipalities.
⬚ figure
Members of the AlexWest community drove this Plan forward. The work represented here would not have been realized without thoughtful and sustained community input. Given the size of the Plan area, the many different communities that live here, and the potential consequences of inaction, the City’s community engagement efforts focused on intentionally engaging AlexWest’s historically marginalized communities and residents who do not typically participate in traditional planning efforts, as well as building on the relationships of established community organizations. Through committed and inclusive community engagement designed to enhance accessibility for all, and in partnership with
AlexWest’s active community and civic organizations, over 1,500 residents participated in the process at more than 40 different community events. The lived experiences that residents shared over the course of this process have informed nearly all aspects of the Plan.
As new proposals and developments proceed, it is crucial that all stakeholders monitor and engage in implementation of the Plan to ensure that new affordable housing, commercial development, parks, and city facilities meet the intent of the Plan and are consistent with the objectives identified by community members during this planning process.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
This page is intentionally left blank.
Ensure that future development considers both housing affordability and the changing market by implementing a land use strategy that prioritizes inclusive growth in areas that will minimize displacement, retain the culture and diversity of the area, maximize the use of transit, provide neighborhood-serving retail, be well-designed, and enhance the social infrastructure (parks, civic uses, public realm, public space, and high-quality design) that improves residents’ quality of life.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The Plan area features a mix of residential, commercial, civic, and institutional uses of varying building scales and densities. The existing land uses, as depicted in Figure 2.1: Existing Land Uses, are generally separated with a concentration of commercial uses in the central portion of the Plan area and on the major corridors of King and Duke Streets. A significant portion of the commercial office uses are anticipated to convert to other uses. Retail businesses in the area are experiencing and will likely continue to experience increasing financial pressures, including rent escalation, impacting their ability to remain in the Plan area and potentially also acting as a deterrent to new small and/or local businesses. Institutional uses in the Plan area include public schools, the City’s community resource center, and the Northern Virginia Community College. Interstate 395 serves as a barrier on the eastern side of the Plan area.
⬚ figure
Existing Land Use
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Residential High-Rise
⬚ figure
Civic/Institutional
⬚ figure
Commercial - Office
⬚ figure
Open Space
⬚ figure
Residential Low-Rise
⬚ figure
Residential Mid-Rise
⬚ figure
Commercial - Retail
As part of the Plan’s goal to minimize displacement, the Land Use Strategy designates and establishes criteria for three different areas based on existing and planned development, described below and depicted in Figure 2.2: Land Use Strategy.
Within the Focus Area, commercial and office spaces, as well as more than 75 acres of surface parking, represent an opportunity for new residential development to occur in areas that do not contain residential uses, therefore not displacing existing residents. In the short- to mid-term, this approach will lessen market pressure on many existing and at-risk residential buildings. Development that occurs on existing parking lots will provide new parking for existing and future needs.
New residential development in the Focus Area will provide 10% committed affordable housing, as well as other important community benefits, such as neighborhood-serving retail, new public open spaces, adequate parking, and safety and mobility improvements. New development will also be close to frequent bus service, affordably connecting residents to jobs, amenities, and other destinations locally and regionally.
The development requirements of the Focus Area are summarized in Table 2.1: Focus Area Criteria, with more detailed requirements by neighborhood in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods.
It should be noted that the 137-acre site highlighted in Figure 2.2: Land Use Strategy in the southern portion of the Focus Area contains existing garden apartments. While the Plan’s overall strategy generally avoids development on existing residential sites to minimize displacement, this site was included in the Focus Area due to the amount of development already permitted through existing zoning. The Plan does not recommend additional density for the site above and beyond what is already contemplated by the approved CDD.
Development is not broadly anticipated in Area 2. However, there may be sites that will develop in the future which will be required to provide the same community benefits of design, public open space, connectivity, and affordable housing as development in the Focus Area. The development requirements of Area 2 are summarized in Table 2.2: Area 2 Criteria.
Development that may occur within Area 3 will be subject to City policies and regulations in place at the time of development. The Plan does not recommend changes to existing land uses, density, and building heights for Area 3.
⬚ figure
| Table 2.1: Focus Area Criteria | Table 2.2: Area 2 Criteria | |
|---|---|---|
| Land Use(s) | Refer to Figure 2.3: Land Uses | Residential |
| Building Heights | Refer to Figure 2.4: Building Heights | Refer to Figure 2.4: Building Heights |
| Design | Subject to Design Guidelines | Subject to Design Guidelines |
| Public Open Spaces | Refer to Figure 5.3: Parks + Open Space | 20,000 SF consolidated for every 90,000 SF of land developed |
| Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | 3.0* | 2.0 |
| Street Connections | Refer to Figures 4.2-4.5 | Subject to Design Guidelines |
*Unless otherwise shown in the Development Tables in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods.
⬚ figure
The Plan generally recommends a mix of residential and commercial uses to enable development to adapt to changing market conditions. The Focus Area also includes concentrated areas of neighborhood-serving retail. The land uses in Area 2 and Area 3 are generally intended to be residential uses. Figure 2.3: Land Uses depicts recommended land use designations. The Residential land use designation allows only residential uses (townhomes, multi-unit buildings, etc.) and neighborhood-serving retail when allowed by the underlying zoning. It is the intent of the plan that residential development within the Focus Area will be predominantly multi-unit development, with some limited townhouse/stacked townhouse development. In addition, Home for the Elderly and other comparable senior-serving uses are permitted in the Focus Area and Area 2.
Residential or Commercial can include residential uses or commercial uses (office, hotel, retail etc.) or a mix of both. Recognizing the importance of civic uses in a community, City facilities and other civic uses may be located within the Residential and Residential or Commercial land use designations. Uses that do not contribute to an active public realm and walkable neighborhood, such as warehouses, storage buildings, and data centers, are considered inconsistent with the intent of the Plan.
⬚ figure
Allowing residential and commercial uses in areas enables new development to adapt to changing market pressures.
Concentrating retail in mixed-use neighborhoods will help provide the types of services residents need within walking distance.
Allowing a variety of heights and densities, especially of housing, expands and diversifies the housing stock.
As demand for office use in the Plan area continues to wane, it is especially important to address this change for the future. With the Plan’s land use strategy, there are opportunities, particularly in the Focus Area, for existing office buildings to convert to residential buildings, increasing the supply of housing in the City and meeting the needs of the community. However, the Plan does not require that office uses be converted to residential, as the market for some office uses will continue to exist and can provide a source of employment for community members and opportunities for local businesses.
City Boundary AlexWest Boundary Focus Area Land Use Residential Residential or Commercial Encouraged Retail Required Retail Planned Parks Existing Parks
⬚ figure
Notes:
Building heights are depicted in Figure 2.4: Building Heights. Taller heights are generally located within the Focus Area, closer to transit service, and along major corridors. As depicted in Figure 2.4, there are three tiers of building heights that can be utilized with the provision of committed affordable housing in the amounts specified below or in amounts consistent with City affordable housing contribution policies, regulations, and procedures in effect at the time development is accepted for review, whichever is greater.
Consistent with recommendations in the Plan, in coordination with the Directors of Planning and Zoning and Housing and at their sole discretion, developers may propose alternative housing opportunities of equivalent value to meet committed affordable housing requirements, including providing committed affordable units in existing building(s), in order to deepen and expand affordability.
Across the Plan area there are varying Floor Area Ratios (FARs) recommended depending on location. The Plan generally recommends an FAR of 3.0 for the Focus Area and a FAR of 2.0 for Area 2. Further detail regarding FAR is provided in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods. The recommended FARs are intended to enable a meaningful increase in housing supply in the Focus Area while also taking into consideration urban design, public facilities, and infrastructure capacity.
To implement the Plan Recommendations, some of the properties will need to amend their existing zone, or implement a different zone or new zoning category.
The Plan is based on urban design best practices of connectivity, urban-scale blocks, a pedestrian-oriented public realm, active uses on the ground floor, engaging public spaces, and high-quality building design and materials. In addition, the design of the public streetscape plays a fundamental role in increasing safety and walkability in the Plan area. Development will comply with the Design Guidelines for streetscapes, the public realm, and the built environment.
⬚ figure
| Tier A: Plan | Tier B: Plan Max | Tier C: With Section 7-700 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 ft | 35 ft | 35 ft | |
| 45 ft | 45 ft | 45 ft | |
| 60 ft | 85 ft | 110 ft | |
| 85 ft | 110 ft | 135 ft | |
| 100 ft | 125 ft | 150 ft | |
| 110 ft | 135 ft | 160 ft | |
| 130 ft | 155 ft | 180 ft | |
| 150 ft | 175 ft | 200 ft |
Refer to the Building Heights section on page 18 for affordable housing requirements.
⬚ figure
Notes:
Neighborhood-serving retail is a key element for a thriving community, providing essential goods and services within walking distance, fostering social interaction among neighbors and local business owners, and providing opportunities for culturally relevant businesses and entrepreneurs to serve their communities. Concentrating retail in key nodes in the Focus Area, rather than having it dispersed, will create a critical mass of commercial activity, supporting active, walkable neighborhood centers. The required retail locations are generally located near major transit stops or at nodes along key neighborhood corridors.
Figure 2.3: Land Uses depicts the locations for required ground floor retail in new development. The map also indicates several encouraged retail areas, locations where ground floor retail is preferred but not required. Design of the ground floor retail spaces in the Required and Encouraged Retail Areas will be subject to Design Guidelines to ensure that future uses promote a high degree of pedestrian activity, transparency, and engagement with the adjacent streetscape.
The Plan area’s locally owned small businesses help foster a sense of community, provide a diversity of jobs, and provide important neighborhood services. There is a strong desire for locally-owned small businesses, many of which reflect the identity and culture of the residents, to remain within and/or locate within the community. The Plan recognizes that the small, affordable commercial tenant spaces that most local businesses occupy are a key element in commercial districts to provide opportunities for a diversity of businesses.
It is the intent of the Plan that City programs, policies, and zoning be used to retain and grow small and locally owned businesses. In addition, the Plan recommends allowing interim uses, including pop-up commercial uses, in the surface parking lots as areas for entrepreneurs and local businesses.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
A variety of building heights are encouraged.
Tree canopy helps provide shade and relief in public spaces.
Ground floor retail oriented towards public open spaces and streets helps activate the public realm.
Different modes of transportation are integrated and supported.
Public parks and open spaces are designed for people of all ages.
This rendering of Seminary Plaza is for illustrative purposes only (see Figure 8.6 in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods).
The Plan encourages interim uses on vacant or underutilized sites and surface parking lots. Interim uses can activate underutilized sites at a neighborhood level, create a sense of place, and provide local creatives, organizations, and small businesses opportunities to engage with the community.
Interim uses could include farmers markets, parklets, pop-up open spaces, food trucks, temporary stages, and other similar uses if they do not preclude future development envisioned by the Plan. Examples of activation strategies include repurposing indoor and outdoor public spaces for community programming, outdoor dining, performances, public art installations, cultural activities and celebrations, and similar activities.
⬚ figure
Successful urban communities incorporate civic and social infrastructure and services for residents. Community facilities provide space for essential social and public services and play an important role in enhancing the livability of the Plan area. The flexible land use strategy recommended by the Plan enables opportunities and permits uses for implementing creative community serving spaces that support small businesses, artist entrepreneurs, and community arts/cultural uses that can serve as a cultural hub for the community.
Given the size of the Plan area, its population, and the limited capacity of the existing recreation center in the southern portion of the Plan area, the Plan recommends that a new Recreation Center be located within AlexWest to serve the community, ideally within the northern portion of the Plan area and near transit. The primary opportunity site for locating a new facility is the Terrace Neighborhood portion of NVCC, given its location and redevelopment potential. In the event that the Terrace Neighborhood is deemed infeasible by the City, there are other potentially feasible sites and the City will continue to work with other development/opportunity sites in the Plan area. Funding for a new facility will be considered as part of the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and/or grant funding sources.
Public education is a crucial public service, especially in areas that are expected to see a growth of families and young professionals over time. With this in mind, the Plan provides flexibility for Alexandria City Public School (ACPS) sites, including William Ramsay and John Adams Elementary Schools, to expand to meet the needs of their student populations. Both sites, as well as the existing Ferdinand T. Day K-8 school and the new adjacent ACPS-owned site, are incorporated within the Focus Area.
Forecasted development and 2023 student generation rates suggest approximately 100-350 net new ACPS students will live in AlexWest over the next 25 years, spanning all grade levels K-12. Given the existing school facilities within the Plan area with the ability to expand, as well as planned future school capacity in higher grades elsewhere in the City, additional public education facilities are not needed within AlexWest.
⬚ figure
The Northern Virginia Community College (NVCC) – Alexandria Campus is an important community and regional asset located in the Plan area, with 14,000 students attending annually. The Plan recommends the potential development of the lower campus, including the provision of a new street network, new public parks, and market-rate and affordable housing, close to a transit stop. This development presents a generational opportunity to stitch the college back into the fabric of the neighborhood rather than remaining as a separate facility.
⬚ figure
Note:
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
(blank page)
Ensure a livable, diverse, and affordable community for current and future residents by minimizing residential displacement through inclusive development that employs a variety of tools for the expansion of housing options and preservation of existing affordability.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The region, Alexandria, and the Plan area are grappling with housing affordability. The price of housing and cost of living are increasing at a faster rate than housing production or income growth. In particular, demand for housing near jobs, services, and transit is increasing while supply is lacking or unaffordable in those locations. This combination has caused more residents to become cost burdened (paying more than 30% of their gross income in rent), which compounds the risk of displacement and the likelihood of overcrowding. People with low- and moderate-incomes, people of color, and families with children are most impacted by this tremendous housing pressure. In fact, 98% of AlexWest rental households earning less than $50,000 per year are cost burdened. Without intervention, this crisis will continue to worsen, posing short-, mid-, and long-term threats to the existing affordable- and market-rate housing in the Plan area.
Making the situation more challenging is that more than half of the area’s housing units were built during the 1950s and 1960s, leading to a variety of maintenance issues, which can ultimately lead to increases in housing costs and displacement as potential renovations occur. Further, the City has limited authority to implement tenant protection policies, increase affordable housing requirements, and provide more stringent requirements for property maintenance. The intent of this Plan, and other City policies such as the Housing Master Plan, is to proactively address these challenges.
| 38% <br> of the City’s <br> Market Affordable <br> Rental Units | 14% <br> of the City’s <br> Committed <br> Affordable Rental <br> Units | 98% <br> of Renter <br> Households <br> earning less <br> than $50,000 <br> per year are cost <br> burdened | $2,425 <br> is the average <br> 2023 rent for a <br> two bedroom <br> apartment with <br> utilities |
| 74% <br> of Ownership <br> Units are Condos | 50% <br> of Condo Units <br> were built in the <br> 1960-70s | 72% <br> of Owner <br> Households <br> earning less <br> than $75,000 <br> per year are cost <br> burdened | $300K <br> is the average <br> assessed value <br> for a Condo Unit |
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
“Increase overall housing supply [is] an important component to expanding housing opportunity, alongside the already-included needs for dedicated affordable units and a variety of unit types...”
“If other parts of Alexandria and NoVA were more like our neighborhood — with a mix of housing types and lots of density — our region would be much more affordable, sustainable, and diverse.”
“I worry about how expensive [renting] has gotten, we need to allow a lot more housing to be built. Growth is good, other parts of the City should allow more density too!”
By Level of Affordability
⬚ figure
Area Median Income (AMI): Income levels that are established annually by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for households of various sizes, where half of the households in the region earn more and half earn less. In 2024, the area median income for a household of four for the Washington, DC Metropolitan Statistical Area is $154,700.
Affordable housing is the foundation for household stability and well-being. Children do better in school when they live in housing that is stable and healthy while seniors and others on fixed incomes have opportunities to age safely in homes that are affordable and accessible. Affordable housing is the cornerstone of the City’s commitment to diversity, racial and social equity, and access to opportunity for people of all incomes, abilities, and stages of life.
Not only does housing affordability and the risk of displacement have a personal impact on the individuals and families who struggle to pay for housing, it also has broader impacts on their communities, the City, and the region. When community members leave, their social networks are weakened and the threads that help to make AlexWest’s neighborhoods unique are strained. Eventually, these networks disappear altogether.
Affordable housing is also a crucial component to the City’s long-term economic vitality and growth. Housing that is affordable at a range of levels is essential to retain and attract the workforce necessary to sustain Alexandria’s local economy. When these workers, including many of the City’s essential workers, are unable to afford to live in Alexandria, the City and the region suffer economically.
Many community members who participated in developing this Plan expressed a fear of being displaced from their neighborhoods and communities. While the City currently does not have the authority to prevent displacement in individual cases of residential redevelopment or repositioning, the Plan envisions a coordinated approach to help consistently mitigate and minimize displacement.
The Plan’s Land Use Strategy, detailed in Chapter 2, is a long-term vision and framework aimed primarily at addressing housing affordability by prioritizing new market rate housing and new committed affordable units on surface parking lots and underutilized commercial and office space. Figure 3.1: Opportunities for Development Without Displacement illustrates potential locations for residential development that do not result in displacement of existing residents.
For areas in the Focus Area with existing garden apartments, those apartments may be retained as part of the development process if they achieve the housing affordability goals of the Plan and comply with the open space and connectivity recommendations of the Plan. In doing so, the Plan aims to produce new housing while minimizing the displacement of existing residents. The Plan is intended to work in coordination with the City’s Housing Master Plan and additional legislative authority if granted to the City.
— City Boundary — AlexWest Boundary ■ Potential Housing Opportunities without Residential Displacement
⬚ figure
At the most basic level, residential displacement is the involuntary relocation of current residents or businesses. Often, residents must move to homes that are farther away, less well maintained, or smaller. There are many different reasons that a resident may be displaced from their home. Some of the most common reasons are illustrated below.
⬚ figure
Rising Housing Costs: When a resident can no longer afford to remain in their home due to rising housing costs such as large increases in rent, utilities, and/or fees.
Lease Termination: When a landlord or property owner decides not to renew a resident’s lease at the end of the term.
⬚ figure
Redevelopment or Repositioning: When a home is proposed to be redeveloped or because renovations drive up the rent.
Building Conditions: When the condition of a home poses concerns, including mold, infrastructure problems, pests, and other reasons.
⬚ figure
Development in the Focus Area that utilizes Tier A Plan Building Heights will provide 10% of new residential development over base residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) (as established in Figures 8.1–8.12 and Tables 8.1–8.12 in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods) as committed affordable housing or in an amount consistent with the City’s affordable housing contributions policies and regulations in effect at the time development is accepted for review, whichever is greater. Affordable rental units are intended to be affordable to households at 60% of the Area Median Income (AMI), while for-sale units are priced to be affordable generally between 70% and 100% of the AMI.
Where feasible, and in coordination with the City, developers are encouraged to consider alternative opportunities of equivalent value to meet their committed affordable rental housing requirements in order to maximize the provision of deeply affordable rental housing at 40-50% AMI, and/or to expand affordability through public private partnerships, preservation or dedication.
While significant development is not anticipated in Area 2, future development proposed in this area that utilizes Tier A Plan Building Heights will be required to provide 10% of additional residential development proposed above their existing zoning as affordable housing. In addition to these requirements, development that utilizes Tier B Plan Maximum Building Heights will provide 10% of the increased Floor Area Ratio (FAR) above Tier A Plan Building Height as committed affordable housing.
For resulting committed affordable rental units, half will be affordable to households with incomes at 40% AMI and half will be affordable to households with incomes at 50% AMI. Resulting committed affordable for-sale units will be priced to be affordable up to 80% AMI consistent with City homeownership policies.
Properties may request additional bonus building height and density above what is depicted in the Plan in Figure 2.4 (Tier C Section 7-700), Figures 8.1–8.12 and Tables 8.1–8.12 with the provision of additional committed affordable units as permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. In the Focus Area and Area 2, bonus density above 30% is authorized to encourage further production of committed affordable units. Building heights are intended to facilitate flexibility for property owners, such as the Alexandria Redevelopment and Housing Authority (ARHA), to add to the AlexWest affordable housing stock.
Property owners with multiple residential properties in the Plan area will be encouraged to collaborate with the City on affordable housing plans for their properties as part of the development process. These plans will help provide both an early assurance of how the affordable housing requirements will be fulfilled and additional opportunities for deeper and/or expanded affordability.
Diversity in housing choice is an important element in creating complete neighborhoods where households of all incomes, abilities, sizes, and life stages can live safely and affordably. The Plan enables a diverse range of housing options, including different prices, sizes,
⬚ figure
types, and tenures (rental and homeownership). Strengthening the area’s housing stock diversity and affordability will provide existing and new residents with opportunities to live in AlexWest at levels they can afford and help reduce the risk of displacement of lower-income residents. In addition, the Plan recommends increased building efficiency for new affordable and market rate units, decreasing the costs of utilities and minimizing the impact of new development on the environment.
Working together with many kinds of partners is essential to providing more affordable housing, particularly more deeply affordable housing. Public-private partnerships, such as with existing community organizations, non-profits, local property owners and developers, and City, State, and Federal agencies, will deepen and expand affordable housing options.
Building on past successes in producing deeply affordable housing, the City will continue to seek out partnerships with local property owners, developers, and non-profits to:
A thriving and affordable housing market in AlexWest requires that residents are aware of their legal rights and have easy access to the tools and resources they require to advocate for themselves. The City currently works with community partners to promote tenant empowerment through training and mutual support, pair housing assistance with workforce development and job training, offer landlord-tenant mediation services, and provide eviction services. The City will continue to promote and seek compliance with the Voluntary Rent Increase Policy and will work with property owners during redevelopment to minimize impacts to tenants through the development of comprehensive Tenant Relocation Assistance Plans.
In the case of applications subject to the Development Site Plan (DSP) or Development Special Use Permit with Site Plan (DSUP) process, the displacement impacts of residential redevelopment on existing tenants will be documented as part of the projects' respective staff reports and in the City’s annual Implementation Report. This documentation may include the identification of buildings where tenants are at risk of displacement nearby the proposed project. Further, the City will work on legislative and other changes to expand tenant protections and resources.
The City does not currently have legislative authority to require more stringent tenant protections. Expansion of legislative authority to enhance tenant protections may include:
While these tools are outside of the scope of this Plan, they represent important ways that the City could help to ensure that community members, and by extension all City residents, can affordably stay in their homes and live in healthy environments.
Condominium homes serve as an important source of housing for first-time homebuyers, seniors looking to downsize, and households on fixed incomes. However, many of the Plan area’s multi-unit condominium communities are aging and face growing capital maintenance needs, jeopardizing their affordability. The City will continue to provide technical assistance, including governance training, to support and strengthen the Plan area’s condominium and HOA communities. The Office of Housing will also expand access to training, counseling, and related financial and non-financial resources to prepare interested residents for homeownership.
Many homes in the Plan area, especially rental buildings and condominium communities, are aging or experiencing maintenance and building issues that impact livability. It is the intent of this Plan to ensure that community members have access to safe and healthy, not just affordable, homes.
The City will continue to utilize ongoing partnerships and inter-departmental collaborations to identify and proactively address building condition issues with property owners or through existing enforcement mechanisms. Through the Department of Code Administration, the City is coordinating efforts to improve and update existing housing stock. If existing housing units are preserved through dedication or other means, they will be required to be maintained to meet all codes and standards.
Ensure a connected mobility network for all users that enables community members to safely and easily get around AlexWest using all modes of transportation.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Residents in AlexWest travel through their neighborhoods using a variety of different modes, including transit, bike, car, or on foot. Multiple bus routes run along arterial roadways such as N. Beauregard Street, King Street, Seminary Road, and Duke Street; bike facilities and walking trails exist in some areas. While some intersections have been improved to address the safety of people walking and biking, significant improvements are needed. See Figure 4.1: Existing Street Network for an overview of existing conditions.
To meet the current and future needs of the community, the Plan provides a framework for addressing transportation in a comprehensive and holistic manner, placing safety as a priority while enhancing and expanding the existing transportation network. These enhancements will enable individuals of all ages and abilities to more safely navigate within AlexWest and establish stronger connections to both the rest of the City and the wider region.
| 4 <br> City bus <br> lines | ⬚ figure | 12 <br> regional bus <br> lines | ⬚ figure |
⬚ figure | 4 <br> CaBi stations | ⬚ figure | 5 <br> miles of <br> trails |
| 111 <br> miles of <br> sidewalks | ⬚ figure | 6 <br> miles of bike <br> facilities | ⬚ figure |
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The creation of a multimodal, safe, human-scaled, and highly accessible transportation network will increase opportunities for the community to get around safely and easily. With better, more frequent connections, residents across all neighborhoods will have expanded access to destinations throughout the Plan area and beyond, whether it is by walking, biking, riding transit, or driving a vehicle.
Expanding transportation options is crucial for residents with disabilities and low-income and cost burdened households who must rely on affordable means to get around for education, employment, and shopping needs. This Plan recommends safety improvements at high-traffic intersections and corridors, a robust network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities that will connect people to neighborhood amenities and green spaces, an enhanced street network, and increased capacity for reliable public transportation options.
The City will collaborate with Arlington and Fairfax Counties to ensure that connections are mutually beneficial and enhance regional transportation patterns as a whole.
⬚ figure
Safely designed streets will prioritize the well-being and safety of users of varying transportation modes. This may include implementing changes such as the elimination of slip lanes, the reconfiguration of crosswalks to create shorter distances, reallocating travel lanes to better accommodate various modes, and incorporating additional pedestrian refuge areas.
New streets and blocks will be provided as part of development as shown in Figure 4.2: Street Network. These new street connections are intended to create a more reliable street grid, which will increase the number of options that pedestrians, bicyclists, and automobiles have to get around AlexWest without compromising the safety of all road users. The network of streets will assist in diffusing traffic from some arterial streets and provide other mode users, like pedestrians and bicyclists, with a less traffic-intensive option. New streets will adhere to the Street Cross-Sections as outlined in Figures 4.3–4.5.
⬚ figure
Note:
⬚ figure
Note:
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
88 FEET | Transit Street A
⬚ figure
90 FEET | Transit Street B
⬚ figure
136 FEET | Beauregard Transit
⬚ figure
Primary: Applies when a cross-section is not specified for a street or portion of a street.
Primary Streets in the Plan Area:
*The Plan does not recommend new streetscape improvements along the north side of King Street due to the steep topography and existing tree canopy.
⬚ figure
Secondary: Applies when a cross-section is not specified for a street or portion of a street and is not designated as a primary street, including streets such as Mark Center Drive, Dawes Avenue, and S. Bragg Street.
The Plan recommends a network of bike and pedestrian facilities, as illustrated in Figure 4.6: Pedestrian + Bike Network, that will be implemented by development. New and improved pedestrian connections will incorporate designs that promote safe and comfortable travel by foot between and among neighborhoods and an expanded bike network will connect existing trails to each other, expand multi-use paths, trails, and greenways, add new bike facilities across the Plan area, and expand access to shared mobility options (e.g., Capital Bikeshare, Dockless Scooters, etc.).
Further, the Plan recommends limiting new curb cuts, garage entrances, and similar functions along designated bicycle facilities and along N. Beauregard Street, Seminary Road, Duke Street, and King Street to eliminate potential conflicts between cars and cyclists.
⬚ figure
| Trails | Greenways | Sidewalks | Off-Road Multi-Use Paths | Sharrows | On-Road Protected Bike Facilities |
|---|
Planned Bike and Pedestrian Facilities
⬚ figure
Notes:
⬚ figure
Shortened Crosswalks
⬚ figure
Pedestrian Refuge Areas
⬚ figure
Raised Crosswalks
⬚ figure
Dynamic Speed Radar
⬚ figure
Higher Visibility Crossings
⬚ figure
BEFORE
⬚ figure
AFTER
Removal of Slip Lanes
The West End Transitway (WET) integrates AlexWest into the fabric of the broader West End, the rest of Alexandria, and the region, connecting to several transit facilities and stations and to the future Inova Hospital complex. Figure 4.7: West End Transitway Route shows the planned WET route and station locations. New development will be required to enhance transit services by providing transit facilities, such as bus shelters or other improvements.
The Plan recommends a new enhanced transit facility within the Southern Towers neighborhood, which has one of the highest transit ridership rates in the City. Current bus stop locations are in the busy parking lots and create challenging conditions for pedestrians, transit riders, and drivers. A new facility will create a safe and accessible way for current and future residents to access transit, as shown in Figure 4.8: Southern Towers Enhanced Transit Facility.
The City’s DASH local bus system will expand to include more services to and from AlexWest, and the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) is configuring its Metrobus network for improved connections between local jurisdictions, including Alexandria. Finally, King Street is anticipating a new bus rapid transit corridor that will connect Fairfax County and the City of Falls Church to transit facilities in AlexWest. These regional improvements will greatly enhance AlexWest’s overall connectivity within the greater metropolitan region.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Rendering is for illustrative purposes only.
Several corridors in the Plan area, including certain intersections along King Street, Seminary Road, and Sanger Avenue, among other locations, have been identified for improvements based on collision frequency data, consistent with the City’s Vision Zero goal to eliminate fatalities from traffic collisions by 2028.
The locations identified are at high-volume intersections along wide roadways, which are also known as “high crash corridors.” The City will work with property owners and other partners to study and address mobility-related issues at the intersections and along the corridors identified in Figure 4.9: Safety Enhancements Study Areas. In addition, the City will explore options for improving safety and accessibility for all users on Seminary Road, generally from Mark Center Drive to Library Lane.
⬚ figure
The Plan recommends a redesign of the intersection of N. Beauregard Street and Seminary Road to address the intent of the Plan to better accommodate all users, provide safety measures that increase the comfort and visibility of pedestrians and bicyclists, enhance the streetscape, and maintain ease of access for public transit and vehicles to pass through. Elements of these intersection improvements can be seen in Figure 4.10: Seminary Road + N. Beauregard Street. The Upland Park corner of the intersection may be configured differently, as discussed within Chapter 8: Neighborhoods.
⬚ figure
Rendering is for illustrative purposes only.
Ensure equitable access to the network of existing and planned public open space and provide expanded and improved amenities for people of all ages and abilities.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Despite existing public parks and natural areas, AlexWest’s public open space network has gaps, meaning that some parks are disconnected and inaccessible to some neighborhoods. These gaps are particularly evident where residents must walk more than a half-mile to access any type of public open space, often facing barriers like high-speed roads, inconsistent sidewalks, and closed park entry points. Figure 5.1: Open Space Existing Conditions shows existing parks in AlexWest and demonstrates a number of gaps where residents do not have access to a park within a 10-minute walk of their home, such as near Duke Street and near the existing Coca-Cola facility on Dawes Avenue. Parks are also occasionally lacking in amenities, with over 65% of residents lacking easy access to a playground or sports field.
The William Ramsay Recreation Center, the only recreation center in the area, serves thousands of residents annually and provides community members access to a gymnasium, fitness and recreational classes, a dance studio, and other educational programs and social services. Community use of the William Ramsay Recreation Center is restricted during school hours since the space is used by William Ramsay Elementary School during the day for classes and afterschool programming.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The Plan anticipates approximately 60 acres of new publicly accessible parks in the Focus Area. The new parks will fill in gaps in the current open space network as shown in Figure 5.2: Walking Distance to Parks + Open Space and Figure 5.3: Parks + Open Space so that all residents will live within walking distance of public open space and recreation resources. New parks will consist of a variety of sizes and amenities, as specified in Figures 8.1–8.12 and Tables 8.1–8.12 in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods, to meet the needs of different ages and abilities. Parks listed in the tables are required as development occurs and will be open to the public.
Residential uses require more open space than commercial uses to serve the more intensive open space needs of households compared to workers. In locations in the Garden District where the Plan allows land use to be either residential or commercial (see Figure 8.10 and Table 8.10 in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods), development that is entirely residential will provide an additional 10,000 square feet of public open space consolidated with other nearby planned parks. While development is not broadly anticipated in Area 2 or 3, the Plan requires open space should development occur. In Area 2, 20,000 square feet of public open space will be provided for every 90,000 square feet of land developed. In Area 3, open space amenities will be provided consistent with zoning and the most current open space needs assessment. In addition to the publicly accessible open space required in Figure 5.3, development will provide onsite open space.
⬚ figure
AlexWest currently lacks a full-time recreation facility with services accessible to the community daily. Recreation centers provide many important services beyond active recreation for social support and cultural interaction, including after school care, adult services, classes, community meeting spaces, cultural celebrations, and more. These opportunities are particularly valuable for communities in AlexWest who lack access to similar private facilities. In order to ensure AlexWest residents enjoy the same level of access to these services as residents in other parts of the City, the City will locate a new recreation center or similar facility on City-owned land and/or co-located with other uses as part of new development. Funding for such a facility will compete for funding through the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and/or grant funding sources.
⬚ figure
Notes:
Without increased investment in parks, especially as the population grows, up to 85% of residents would have limited access to recreational amenities by 2045. The Plan's objective for a connected public open space network, with crucial links and improved access between existing and new public parks and open spaces, will enable community members to easily access public open spaces in different neighborhoods throughout the Plan area. In service of this goal, new public parks and open spaces provided by development will have multiple publicly accessible entrances. Existing parks, such as the Winkler Botanical Preserve, James Mulligan Park, and the Stonegate Scenic Easement will get new entryways to enhance connectivity and increase community use.
Winkler Botanical Preserve, for example, is a 50-acre natural preserve owned by NOVA Parks that is open to the public but has only one entrance. Working with NOVA Parks to create up to three new access points will make the trails and natural beauty of the park more accessible for the broader community to get to and better connect to the area's open space network.
⬚ figure
Public open spaces that provide a wide range of activities foster social interactions among users, provide space for meaningful community building, and encourage unique, culturally relevant programming. New public open spaces offer the opportunity to expand and diversify the amenities, programming, and types of open space uses in AlexWest, making it a more robust and multi-use network overall.
Consistent with this objective, the Plan recommends that new parks provide a variety of amenities as identified in Figures 8.1–8.12 and Tables 8.1–8.12 in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods. The development of these amenities will be shaped by input from the community and the most current Open Space Needs Assessment at the time of development to ensure that new parks meet the needs of residents of different ages and abilities, are functional and welcoming, encourage social interaction, and facilitate recreation. From a functionality perspective, the feasibility of restroom facilities, either within parks or within nearby development, should be explored. In addition, parks should incorporate lighting to extend the usability of the space into evening hours when temperatures are cooler. As part of the phasing of the new open public space/parks it is anticipated that they will designed and constructed within each neighborhood in a phased manner that is proportional with new development.
⬚ figure
Rendering is for illustrative purposes only.
Expanding the public open space network also creates opportunity for new public art in AlexWest, providing direct access to arts and cultural resources in neighborhoods currently lacking these amenities. Public art can take many forms, including art installations, live performances, and interactive events, all of which help to activate public open spaces by making them inviting and interesting. Integrating space for events and performances enables residents to come together for celebrations, facilitates collaboration, and supports creative entrepreneurship.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
A variety of park amenities will be provided as part of new parks in AlexWest to meet a variety of community needs. These images are illustrative examples of the amenities specified in Figures 8.1–8.12 and Tables 8.1–8.12 in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods.
⬚ figure
Playground
⬚ figure
Dog Park
⬚ figure
Flexible Seating Area
⬚ figure
Multi-Purpose Athletic Court
⬚ figure
Shade Structure
⬚ figure
Rectangular Field
⬚ figure
Exercise Play Feature
⬚ figure
Flexible Lawn Area
⬚ figure
Natural Area
Enhance water quality, natural ecosystems, energy efficiency, and tree canopy, and mitigate heat island impacts for a healthier quality of life for all.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
As the impacts of climate change become more consequential, inclusive growth and sustainable development will be integral to addressing and mitigating impacts. In AlexWest, consistent with City-wide priorities, planning for sustainability will include enhancing tree canopy for shade, reducing impervious surfaces, managing and treating stormwater to protect waterways, enhancing the natural habitat and landscaping, utilizing the City’s green building principles for energy efficiency, and creating transit-rich, walkable, bikeable neighborhoods.
⬚ figure
Tree canopy is inconsistent across AlexWest’s neighborhoods, despite the area’s total tree canopy coverage being slightly higher than the City average. The impact of this disparity is particularly evident in areas with a higher proportion of surface parking lots (and consequently a lower proportion of tree coverage).
Roughly 141 acres (11% of the overall Plan area) is made up of paved surface parking lots, as shown in Figure 6.1: Existing Tree Canopy + Parking Lots. Of those 141 acres, more than 75 acres (or 55%) are located in the Focus Area. These areas contribute to higher surface land temperatures during the summertime as heat is absorbed into the pavement, significantly increasing temperatures in the surrounding area. Existing surface parking lots also do not detain or clean stormwater, resulting in warmed, polluted runoff being carried to nearby waterways, impacting water quality and the natural ecosystem.
⬚ figure
Sustainability Recommendations and Actions
Related Plan Chapter(s)
Existing Tree Canopy Existing Surface Parking Lots Focus Area Surface Temperature Range (82°F to 114°F)
⬚ figure
The Plan’s approach for inclusive growth utilizes a variety of elements that when taken together achieve significant progress toward a more sustainable community for all, with an intentional focus on improving the lives of AlexWest’s residents. Beginning with the Land Use Strategy, which prioritizes new housing on existing surface parking lots, development will also provide improved stormwater management and tree canopy, resulting in a healthier natural ecosystem and community at both the block and neighborhood level. The strategy aims to alleviate negative climate change and environmental impacts that disproportionately fall on vulnerable and marginalized populations.
As surface parking lots are redeveloped in the Focus Area, they will no longer be a source of polluted runoff that negatively impacts the ecology of nearby waterways. New development will incorporate green infrastructure to detain and treat stormwater onsite through the latest best management practices (BMPs) and in compliance with all necessary City provisions and codes.
Tree canopy as part of development will enable more cooling, improve stormwater management, and enhance the community’s green spaces. The Plan recommends that development provide on-site tree canopy coverage consistent with applicable City policies at the time development is submitted for review. If this requirement cannot be met onsite due to physical constraints, the required canopy can be provided in another City-approved location; in AlexWest, it is preferred that the tree canopy be provided within the same land use strategy area (either Focus Area, Area, 2 or Area 3) in which the development is located. As a result, canopy coverage will proportionately increase in the Focus Area overall, improving equitable access to shade and other canopy benefits.
In addition, with the Plan recommendation for approximately 60 acres of new public parks and open spaces, at full build-out residents will have more equitable access to green, healthy, and natural areas, increased pervious surfaces, and more street trees, which will bring better balance to the natural and built ecosystems.
Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) are buffer areas within 100 feet of perennial streams, which are important to the waterway’s integrity and water quality. Removing existing encroachments (such as buildings) from the RPA and restoring this area during redevelopment provides an opportunity to protect and improve water quality, reduce flooding, create green space, and restore habitat.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
All new buildings will meet the City’s Green Building Policy standards and zoning requirements for energy efficiency, high-quality building materials, and open space, all of which contribute to both human and ecological health. Further, the Plan seeks to take advantage of efficiency opportunities offered by large scale development, recommending the exploration and implementation of district-wide energy systems to efficiently combine building heating and cooling loads to lower energy consumption and overall costs.
Air pollution (in the form of greenhouse gases) is a key factor contributing to climate change, resulting in extreme weather events and conditions, such as severe heat and storms. With guidance for the design and development of future buildings and transportation networks, the Plan can influence lower emissions from these sectors, which will result in cleaner air. The Plan’s recommendations for safe and easy options for residents to access neighborhood services, amenities, and jobs without the need for a car will help to reduce air pollution, benefiting not only residents’ health but also their ability to remain affordably in the neighborhood.
⬚ figure
This page is intentionally left blank.
Residential development in the Focus Area that utilizes Tier A and Tier B building heights will comply with Figure 2.4 and provide 10% of any development above the base residential, as generally depicted in Figures and Tables 8.1-8.12 in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods and described in Chapters 2 and 3, as on-site Committed Affordable Housing, or in an amount consistent with City affordable housing contribution policies, regulations, and procedures in effect at the time development is accepted for review, whichever is greater.
Residential development in Area 2 that utilizes Tier A and Tier B heights will comply with Figure 2.4 and provide 10% of any development proposed above the existing zoning, as described in Chapters 2 and 3, as on-site Committed Affordable Housing, or in an amount consistent with City affordable housing contribution policies, regulations, and procedures in effect at the time development is accepted for review, whichever is greater.
Affordable housing monetary contributions will be consistent with City affordable housing contribution regulations, policies, and procedures in effect at the time development is accepted for review.
Where feasible, and in coordination with the City, developers are strongly encouraged to consider alternative opportunities of equivalent value to meet their committed affordable housing requirements in order to maximize the provision of deeply affordable rental housing at 40-50% AMI and to expand affordability. These can include, but are not limited to: a. Offering a greater number of affordable units, including family-sized units, in existing buildings (versus new development); b. Providing a greater number of affordable units off-site, but within or in close proximity to the Plan area; c. Providing a fewer number of affordable units in exchange for deeper levels of affordability; d. Providing a monetary contribution to leverage other sources and; e. Dedicating land, development rights, or property to maximize affordable housing development through third party partners.
Property owners with multiple residential properties within the Plan area are encouraged to work with the City to develop an overall affordable housing plan that considers strategies to provide committed affordable housing in a coordinated fashion.
Residential development in Coordinated Development Districts requesting density above what is proposed pursuant to the Plan will provide one third of the additional residential density as committed affordable housing or an amount consistent with City affordable housing contribution regulations, policies, and procedures in effect at the time development is accepted for review, whichever is greater.
Pursuant to Section 7-700 of the Zoning Ordinance, bonus density above 30% is authorized in the Focus Area and Area 2 to encourage the production of additional committed affordable units.
Residential development should provide a range of housing types, designs, and tenures throughout the Plan area to meet current and future housing needs and accommodate different household sizes, compositions, stages of life, and abilities.
C. Tenant Protections
D. Homeownership
B. Pedestrian + Bicycle Network
Development will provide a network of bike facilities as generally depicted in Figure 4.6: Pedestrian + Bike Network.
Development that occurs in Area 2 and Area 3, as depicted in Figure 2.2: Land Use Strategy, will implement new pedestrian and bicycle connections that link to the network depicted in Figure 4.6: Pedestrian + Bike Network.
Development will ensure and support access to shared mobility options (e.g., Capital Bikeshare, Dockless Scooters, etc.).
Curb cuts, garage entrances, and similar functions are prohibited along designated bicycle facilities and along N. Beauregard Street, Seminary Road, Duke Street, and King Street. This does not apply to curb cuts needed for existing or planned streets.
When possible, the City will work with property owners to add additional pedestrian and bicycle connections not shown on Figure 4.6: Pedestrian + Bike Network.
Development will provide pedestrian connections within development blocks.
C. Safety
Development will be responsible for providing all necessary improvements and right-of-way for the frontages at the intersection of Seminary Road and N. Beauregard Street to better accommodate and ensure the safety of all users as generally depicted in Figure 4.10: Seminary Road + N. Beauregard Street. The City will provide all other improvements.
The City will explore options for improving safety and accessibility for all users on Seminary Road, from about Mark Center Drive to Library Lane as generally depicted in Figure 4.9: Safety Enhancements Study Areas.
D. Transit
As part of multimodal transit enhancements, a new bus/transit facility will be established at the location generally depicted in Figure 8.5: Crossroads Neighborhood.
Development will provide all necessary transit, pedestrian, and bicycle access and amenities to mitigate the impact caused by the development.
The City will coordinate with all applicable transit partners to explore improvements to existing transit operations.
Development will provide an at-grade publicly accessible public park/open space network, as generally depicted in Figure 5.3: Parks + Open Space and specified in the Figures and Tables 8.1–8.12 in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods: a. New public parks/open spaces will be fully accessible to the public through dedication to the City or through the provision of a perpetual public access easement(s) that mirrors access to public parks.
b. New public parks/open spaces will have multiple publicly accessible entrances and will consist of a mixture of typologies and amenities. All public parks/open spaces in the Plan area will include gathering spaces and be designed, with input from the community, to be interconnected, functional, useable, welcoming, and encourage social interaction.
c. As part of the design of the larger redevelopment sites, explore the feasibility of providing areas or structures that facilitate and encourage community gathering and entrepreneurship opportunities.
d. The final design and configuration of the public parks/open spaces in Figure 5.3: Parks + Open Space will be subject to compliance with the intent of the AlexWest Plan and the size requirements of Figures and Tables 8.1–8.12 in Chapter 8: Neighborhoods as part of the approval of the public open space(s).
The City will locate a new City recreation center, or similar facility, within the Plan area. City recreational facilities may be located within the public open space recommended by the Plan.
Improve access to existing public and public easement parks.
In addition to the publicly accessible parks and open space required in Figure 5.3: Parks + Open Space, each residential development will provide a minimum of 25% on-site open space, including ground-level and above-grade open space. Residential developments that are not required to provide public parks and open space or developments that provide less than 10% as public parks and open space are expected to provide a greater proportion of at-grade open space as part of the 25% requirement.
In subarea 10A of the Garden Neighborhood (see Figure 8.10: Garden Neighborhood), where development is allowed to include residential or commercial uses, if the uses are entirely residential, development will provide an additional 10,000 square feet of consolidated public open space within the neighborhood to be consolidated with one of the other planned parks.
Public art provided as part of development will highlight the cultural diversity of the Plan area. In addition, private art and other comparable forms of artistic expressions are encouraged to highlight the cultural diversity of the Plan area.
Special events, community activities, and cultural activities in support of the Plan’s intent are encouraged within the public parks and open spaces, subject to all applicable City approvals and permits, or as part of the approval of public access easement(s) in new public open spaces.
Interim recreational uses on existing surface parking lots are encouraged if they do not preclude future development envisioned by the Plan.
Accessory park structures, such as but not limited to restrooms, may be provided within the required publicly accessible open spaces if they are consistent with the City’s open space policies and overall intent of the Plan.
Development will comply with the City’s Green Building Policy at the time development is submitted for review.
Development by large property owners will explore opportunities for the implementation of district-wide sustainability measures and approaches.
Ensure that development sites in the Focus Area implement the Plan’s Recommendations for land use, housing affordability, urban design, open space, and connectivity.
This chapter provides guidance for how each neighborhood in the Focus Area will implement the Plan intent and Recommendations.
The Neighborhood Tables establish the base development on which the affordable housing requirements will be calculated. In addition, the Tables reflect Recommendations for land use, floor area ratio (FAR), retail, building height, and open space. Residential development within the Focus Area will be multi-unit development with a limited amount of townhouses and/or stacked townhouses.
The intent of the Plan is that in neighborhood(s) under common ownership, density will be based on entire tract consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, density may be transferred with the neighborhood(s) subject to all applicable zoning provisions and the street, land use, open space and building height recommendations of the Plan.
Within some of the neighborhoods in the Focus Area there will likely be a need for parking structure(s) as part of development. The Plan recommends flexibility for up to an additional 1.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the provision of replacement parking for existing building(s) that will be retained long-term on the site. The additional FAR for parking does not trigger the affordable housing recommendations. The parking structure(s) will be subject to all applicable Design Guidelines and will not preclude other recommendations of the Plan such as streets and parks.
The parcel and right-of-way boundaries illustrated are approximate. The final configuration of the neighborhoods will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and the Design Guidelines. An overview map of the Focus Area neighborhoods can be found in Figure 8.0: Neighborhoods.
⬚ figure
The Neighborhood Maps include terms that are defined below. In addition to these terms, refer to Table 8.13: Development Table Notes as well as the map notes included on each Neighborhood Map.
⬚ figure
Tree Retention/ Buffer Areas
A tree retention/buffer area is an area where it is desirable to retain areas of mature trees or natural buffer areas that may contain steep slopes.
⬚ figure
Trails
A trail is a pedestrian pathway that is typically narrower than a greenway and may or may not be paved. Trails are typically located within wooded natural areas and public parks.
⬚ figure
Greenways
A greenway is a wide, pedestrian pathway with green spaces on either side of the pathway. In some cases, buildings may be located on either side of a greenway. Sometimes, a greenway may abut a public park or open space.
⬚ figure
Mid-Block Pedestrian Connections
A mid-block pedestrian connection is a building break designed to provide an open and unobstructed pedestrian pathway. These connections must comply with the building break requirements and guidelines in the Design Guidelines.
⬚ figure
Building Blocks/ Streetwalls
Buildings will create a well-defined edge, also known as the building streetwall, that frames and defines the public streets and open spaces. The streetwall provides a sense of spatial definition to enable the street to function as an outdoor room and reinforce pedestrian activity on the sidewalk.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The intent of this Neighborhood is to enable redevelopment of the existing buildings and surface parking lots with buildings that visually denote a gateway entrance to the City and provide neighborhood-serving retail and improve connectivity within the neighborhood.
⬚ figure
Required retail at King Street and N. Beauregard Street will help activate the gateway entrance to Alexandria.
⬚ figure
A new playground will serve the neighborhood.
⬚ figure
New development will enhance and connect to recent existing development projects in the neighborhood.
| Subarea | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio1 (FAR) | Required Ground Floor Retail | Tier A Plan Building Height2 (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities3 | Minimum Size4 (SF) | ||||||
| 1A | Residential/ Commercial | 1.5 | 3.0 | Yes | 100 | 1 | School Age Playground | 6,000 |
| 1B | Residential/ Commercial | 1.5 | 3.0 | No | 60 - 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 1C | Residential/ Commercial | 2.5 | 3.0 | Yes | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
LEGEND
⬚ figure
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate.
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES IN TABLE 8.13
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| — | Neighborhood Boundary |
| - - | City Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| Existing Public Park | |
| Planned Public Park | |
| Existing Public Street to Remain | |
| Required Neighborhood Street | |
| ■■■ | Planned Greenway Connection |
| ●●● | Existing Bike Facility |
| ●●● | Planned Off-Road Multi-Use Paths |
| ●●● | Planned On-Road Protected Bike Facilities |
| ●●● | Planned Sharrows |
⬚ figure
The intent of this Neighborhood is to enable development to connect the Northern Virginia Community College (NVCC) campus to the adjoining neighborhoods and provide an appropriate level of density adjacent to the new West End Transitway stop. Development in this Neighborhood will also provide important community benefits, such as the planned public parks and potential neighborhood-serving retail. As part of the future zoning and development approval(s) for the Terrace Neighborhood, the feasibility of incorporating a new City recreation center or comparable use will be explored. The facility may be a separate facility or integrated within one of the new residential buildings.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The topography can be embraced and integrated into redevelopment.
New buildings should be oriented towards new and existing open spaces.
There is an opportunity for retail uses and possibly a city recreational center that serve students and residents.
| Subarea | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio1 (FAR) | Required Ground Floor Retail | Optional Ground Floor Retail | Tier A Plan Building Height2 (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities3 | Minimum Size4 (SF) | |||||||
| 2A | Residential/ Commercial | 0.75 | 3.0 | No | Yes | 85 | 2 | Natural Areas, Passive Recreation | 260,000 |
| 3 | Flexible Lawn Areas (passive and active), Trails, Natural Areas | 65,000 | |||||||
| 2B | Residential | 2.5 | 3.0 | No | No | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
LEGEND
⬚ figure
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate.
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES IN TABLE 8.13
⬚ figure
New street will provide a new connection from N. Beauregard St. to Dawes Ave.
Approved multi-unit redevelopment at the corner of N. Beauregard St. and W. Braddock Rd.
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| — | Neighborhood Boundary |
| — — | City Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| Existing Public Park | |
| Planned Public Park | |
| Existing Public Street to Remain | |
| Required Neighborhood Street | |
| ■■■ | Planned Greenway Connection |
| ●●● | Existing Bike Facility |
| ●●● | Planned Off-Road Multi-Use Paths |
| ●●● | Planned On-Road Protected Bike Facilities |
| ●●● | Planned Sharrows |
⬚ figure
The intent of this Neighborhood is to encourage the conversion of the existing industrial use to a use that is better integrated with the surrounding areas. This Neighborhood will include new green space and an expanded trail network.
⬚ figure
Mid-block connections are important for breaking up the buildings.
⬚ figure
Greenways are important for connecting new buildings and parks.
⬚ figure
There is an opportunity for a new public park and playground.
| Subarea | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Required Ground Floor Retail | Tier A Plan Building Height1 (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities2 | Minimum Size3 (SF) | ||||||
| 3A | Residential | 0 | 3.0 | No | 60 - 85 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 3B | Residential | 0 | 3.0 | No | 85 | 4 | School Age Playground, Flexible Lawn Area | 25,000 |
Figure 8.3A: Jacobs Neighborhood
⬚ figure
LEGEND
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate. D. Final location of mid-block connection determined as part of development review process.
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES IN TABLE 8.13
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| — | Neighborhood Boundary |
| - - | City Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| ■ | Planned Public Park |
| ■ | Existing Public Street to Remain |
| ■ | Required Neighborhood Street |
| ■ | Recommended Neighborhood Street |
| ■■■ | Planned Greenway Connection |
| ●●● | Existing Bike Facility |
| ●●● | Planned Off-Road Multi-Use Paths |
| ●●● | Planned On-Road Protected Bike Facilities |
| ●●● | Planned Sharrows |
⬚ figure
The intent of this Neighborhood is to encourage a mix of residential uses centered around a new public park and street network that frames the intersection of Seminary Road and N. Beauregard Street. An option for the Upland Park neighborhood could include an option where the City swaps right-of-way for a larger consolidated park adjacent to the existing park.
⬚ figure
Rendering of approved townhomes.
⬚ figure
Rendering of the future park and townhomes.
| Subarea | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Minimum Retail (SF) | Maximum Commercial (SF) | Tier A Plan Building Height¹ (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities² | Minimum Size³ (SF) | |||||||
| 4A | Residential | 0 | 0 | 45 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
| 4B | Residential/ Commercial | 2.0 | 3.2 | 100 | 5 | Playground, Dog Exercise Area, Flexible Lawn Area | 37,000 | ||
| 4C | Residential/ Commercial | 8,000 | 95,000 | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| — | Neighborhood Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| 🟨 | Building Block |
| 🟩 | Planned Public Park |
| ••• | Planned Mid-Block Pedestrian Connection |
| ■■■ | Planned Greenway Connection |
| ⬜ | Existing Public Street to Remain |
| ⬛ | Required Neighborhood Street |
| ⬛ | Recommended Neighborhood Street |
| 🟨 | Residential Land Use |
| 🟦 | Residential/Commercial Land Use |
| ▭ | Natural Intermittent Stream Buffer |
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate. D. Intermittent stream location is approximate. E. Final location of mid-block connection determined as part of development review process. F. A modification to the intermittent stream is possible if approved by City Council.
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES ON TABLE 8.13
Figure 8.4B: Upland Park Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| —— | Neighborhood Boundary |
| - - | City Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| Existing Public Park | |
| Planned Public Park | |
| Existing Public Street to Remain | |
| Required Neighborhood Street | |
| ■ ■ | Recommended Neighborhood Street |
| ●●● | Planned Trail |
| ●●● | Existing Bike Facility |
| ●●● | Planned Off-Road Multi-Use Paths |
| ●●● | Planned On-Road Protected Bike Facilities |
| ●●● | Planned Sharrows |
⬚ figure
The intent of this Neighborhood is to utilize development to obtain crucial community benefits and meaningful improvements for the residents of the Neighborhood's existing buildings. Development on the extensive parking lots will provide market rate housing and Committed Affordable Units. New neighborhood-serving retail, several new parks, and greenway connections will facilitate a safer and more walkable community. The street grid will improve pedestrian safety and provide space for an enhanced transit facility.
Within the neighborhood there will likely be a need for stand alone parking structure(s) as part of development. The parking structure(s) will be subject to all applicable Design Guidelines and will not preclude implementation of the Plan.
⬚ figure
New development and open space will provide opportunities for interim and community-serving uses, such as farmers markets.
⬚ figure
Ground floor commercial spaces will be focused around the new enhanced transit facility and will provide neighborhood-serving retail.
⬚ figure
The enhanced transit facility will allow existing residents in the neighborhood and nearby to safely access transit.
| Subarea | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Maximum Commercial (SF) | Required Ground Floor Retail | Tier A Plan Building Height¹ (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities² | Minimum Size³ (SF) | |||||||
| 5A | Residential/ Commercial | 1.25 | 3.0 | Yes | 100 | 8 | Exercise Play Features, Small Multi-Purpose Athletic Courts | 6,000 | |
| 5B | Residential/ Commercial | 1.25 | 3.0 | 356,100 | No | 85 | 6 | Rectangular Field, Multi-Purpose Athletic Courts, School Age Playground | 140,000 |
| 7 | Small Multi-Purpose Athletic Courts, Dog Exercise Area | 20,000 | |||||||
| 9 | Tot Lot Playground, Flexible Lawn Area, Shade Structures | 9,000 | |||||||
| 5C | Residential | 0.75 | 3.0 | N/A | No | 60 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 5D | Residential/ Commercial | 0.75 | 3.0 | N/A | No | 60 | 10 | Trails, Picnic Areas, Natural Area | 45,000 |
| 5E | Residential/ Commercial | 0.75 | 3.0 | N/A | No | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 5F | Residential/ Commercial | 2.5 | 3.0 | N/A | No | 150 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 5G | Residential/ Commercial | 2.5 | 3.0 | N/A | No | 150 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| —— | Neighborhood Boundary |
| —— | Parcel |
| Existing Building | |
| == | Required Retail Frontage |
| == | Building Block |
| Planned Public Park | |
| ●●● | Planned Mid-Block Pedestrian Connection |
| ■■■ | Planned Greenway Connection |
| ●●● | Planned Trail |
| Existing Public Street to Remain | |
| Required Neighborhood Street | |
| Recommended Neighborhood Street | |
| Residential Land Use | |
| Residential/Commercial Land Use | |
| Ⓑ | Planned BRT Stop |
⬚ figure
New enhanced transit facility.
Natural and Conservation park and greenway connection as part of the open space network.
Retail area for neighborhood-serving retail and a possible farmers market.
Large central public open space to serve as the social center of the neighborhood, which may include amenities as needed for the residents of the neighborhood.
Planned greenway to connect new parks and provide a buffer setback on this portion of the site.
Connection to I-395.
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate. D. Final location of mid-block connection determined as part of development review process. E. The final design of the transit facility shall be consistent with the intent of the Plan, in consultation with the property owner(s).
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES IN TABLE 8.13
Figure 8.5B: Crossroads Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| ▬ | Neighborhood Boundary |
| - - | City Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| ■ | Existing Public Park |
| ■ | Planned Public Park |
| ■ | Existing Public Street to Remain |
| ■ | Required Neighborhood Street |
| ■ | Recommended Neighborhood Street |
| ■■■ | Planned Greenway Connection |
| ●●● | Existing Trail |
| ●●● | Planned Trail |
| ●●● | Existing Bike Facility |
| ●●● | Planned Off-Road Multi-Use Paths |
| ●●● | Planned On-Road Protected Bike Facilities |
| ●●● | Planned Sharrows |
The intent of this Neighborhood is to provide a mixed-use community with a new public park, neighborhood-serving retail, and street connections. The Plan also acknowledges that the existing office and hotel may convert to other uses.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
When located next to retail, the planned open spaces will be activated with the adjoining buildings and uses.
⬚ figure
Streetscapes will be able to accommodate outdoor dining and pedestrians in a safe and comfortable atmosphere.
⬚ figure
Bike lanes will ensure residents can safely navigate the neighborhood by bicycle.
| Subarea | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Required Ground Floor Retail | Tier A Plan Building Height¹ (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | Required Public Open Spaces | Required Public Open Spaces |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities² | Minimum Size³ (SF) | ||||||
| 6A | Residential/ Commercial | 2.0 | 3.0 | Yes | 150 | 12 | Flexible Seating Areas | 2,000 |
| 6B | Residential/ Commercial | 2.0 | 3.0 | Yes | 150 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 6C | Residential/ Commercial | 2.0 | 3.0 | Yes | 85 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 6D | Residential/ Commercial | 0.75 | 3.0 | Yes | 85 | 11 | Multi-Purpose Athletic Courts, Flexible Lawn Area, Shade Structures | 25,000 |
| 6E | Residential | 1.25 | 2.0 | No | 150 | 13 | Dog Park | 6,000 |
| 6F | Residential | 0.75 | 2.0 | No | 85 | 13 | Dog Park | 17,000 |
LEGEND
⬚ figure
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate. D. Final location of mid-block connection determined as part of development review process.
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES ON TABLE 8.13
Explore vacating existing right-of-way in exchange for new streets right-of-way and parks.
New public park adjacent to retail frontages.
Explore feasibility of a new traffic signal at this location.
⬚ figure
| LEGEND | |
|---|---|
| — | Neighborhood Boundary |
| - - | City Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| Existing Public Park | |
| Planned Public Park | |
| Existing Public Street to Remain | |
| Required Neighborhood Street | |
| Recommended Neighborhood Street | |
| - - - | Planned Greenway Connection |
| Existing Trail | |
| ••• | Existing Bike Facility |
| ••• | Planned Off-Road Multi-Use Paths |
| ••• | Planned On-Road Protected Bike Facilities |
The intent of this Neighborhood is to enable infill development with primarily residential uses, increase access to the Winkler Botanical Preserve, and build on the civic role of the Del Pepper Community Resource Center. The Plan also acknowledges that some of the existing office uses will likely convert to other uses.
⬚ figure
New development will encourage ground floor uses that enhance and activate the public realm.
⬚ figure
The Del Pepper Community Resource Center is an important part of this neighborhood. The building provides residents access to the Department of Community and Human Services, the Alexandria Health Department, Neighborhood Health, and the Permit Center.
⬚ figure
Future development will include open space amenities, such as dog exercise areas.
| Subarea | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Required Ground Floor Retail | Tier A Plan Building Height¹ (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities² | Minimum Size³ (SF) | ||||||
| 7A | Residential/ Commercial | 2.5 | 3.0 | No | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 7B | Residential/ Commercial | 1.5 | 3.0 | No | 100 | 16 | Small Multi-Purpose Athletic Courts, Dog Exercise Area | 6,000 |
| 7C | Residential/ Commercial | 2.5 | 3.0 | No | 150 | 14 | Natural Area | 25,000 |
| 15 | Natural Area | 22,000 | ||||||
| 7D | Residential/ Commercial | 2.0 | 3.0 | No | 150 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Figure 8.7A: Central Core Neighborhood
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| — | Neighborhood Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| Existing Building | |
| Building Block | |
| Planned Public Park | |
| ••• | Planned Mid-Block Pedestrian Connection |
| ■■■ | Planned Greenway Connection |
| •••• | Planned Enhanced Pedestrian Connection |
| Existing Public Street to Remain | |
| Required Neighborhood Street | |
| Residential/Commercial Land Use | |
| Resource Protection Area | |
| ⁕ | Possible Winkler Botanical Preserve Pedestrian Access |
| ⚲ | Planned BRT Stop |
⬚ figure
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate. D. Final location of mid-block connection determined as part of development review process.
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES ON TABLE 8.13
⬚ figure
LEGEND
⬚ figure
The intent of this Neighborhood is to build on the existing John Adams Elementary School. Development will be centered around a new approximately 2-acre public park adjacent to the school, and the neighborhood will likely be predominantly residential with an interconnected street network.
⬚ figure
With development, a new rectangular sports field can be located adjacent to John Adams Elementary School.
⬚ figure
A network of trails and greenways will help connect the neighborhood and provide access to adjacent neighborhoods.
⬚ figure
New buildings and streetscapes will better accommodate pedestrians.
| Subarea | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Tier A Plan Building Height¹ (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | Required Public Open Spaces | Required Public Open Spaces |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities² | Minimum Size³ (SF) | |||||
| 8A | Residential/ Commercial | 3.0 | 3.0 | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 8B | Residential/ Commercial | 0 | 3.0 | 85 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 8C | Residential/ Commercial | 0 | 3.0 | 100 | 21 | Trails, Exercise Play Features | 26,500 |
| 8D | Residential/ Commercial | 0 | 3.0 | N/A | 20 | Rectangular Field or Diamond Field | 98,000 |
| 8E | Residential | 0.75 | 2.0 | 60 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
LEGEND
⬚ figure
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate.
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES ON TABLE 8.13
⬚ figure
The park is envisioned to contain a rectangular or diamond field adjoining the John Adams Elementary School site.
A network of existing and planned trails and greenways helps connect the neighborhood.
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| — | Neighborhood Boundary |
| - - | City Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| Existing Public Park | |
| Planned Public Park | |
| Existing Public Street to Remain | |
| Required Neighborhood Street | |
| ■ ■ ■ | Planned Greenway Connection |
| — | Existing Trail |
| ● ● ● | Planned Trail |
| ● ● ● | Existing Bike Facility |
| ● ● ● | Planned Off-Road Multi-Use Paths |
| ● ● ● | Planned On-Road Protected Bike Facilities |
| ● ● ● | Planned Sharrows |
| 🚷 | Possible Winkler Botanical Preserve Pedestrian Access |
⬚ figure
The intent of this Neighborhood is to better integrate it with the surrounding community through an improved and expanded street grid and provide increased neighborhood amenities, such as new access points to Winkler Botanical Preserve, potential retail along N. Beauregard Street, and several new public parks. Given the topography of the neighborhood, planned parks will have views into the Winkler Botanical Preserve.
⬚ figure
New parks and open spaces will provide active and passive opportunities.
⬚ figure
A new street grid will better connect this neighborhood to other surrounding neighborhoods.
⬚ figure
New access points to Winkler Botanical Preserve can greatly benefit nearby ACPS schools.
| Subarea | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Required Ground Floor Retail | Tier A Plan Building Height¹ (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities² | Minimum Size³ (SF) | ||||||
| 9A | Residential/ Commercial | 1.5 | 3.0 | No | 150 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 9B | Residential/ Commercial | 1.5 | 3.0 | No | 100 | 17 | Playground, Shade Structures, Flexible Lawn Area | 35,000 |
| 9C | Residential | 0.67 | 3.0 | No | 100 | 18 | Small Multi-Purpose Athletic Courts, Dog Exercise Area | 25,000 |
| 19 | Small Multi-Purpose Athletic Courts, Shade Structure, Natural Area | 45,000 |
Figure 8.9A: Highland Neighborhood
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| — | Neighborhood Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| Existing Building | |
| ■■■ | Building Block |
| ■■■ | Recommended Retail Frontage |
| ■ | Planned Public Park |
| ●●● | Planned Mid-Block Pedestrian Connection |
| ■ | Existing Public Street to Remain |
| ■ | Required Neighborhood Street |
| ■ | Residential Land Use |
| ■ | Residential/Commercial Land Use |
| ■ | Tree Retention/ Buffer Area |
| 🥾 | Possible Winkler Botanical Preserve Pedestrian Access |
| 🚏 | Planned BRT Stop |
| ■ | Resource Protection Area |
Existing tree and steep slopes retention area.
New public park adjacent to the Winkler Botanical Preserve.
Enhance the entrance to the Winkler Botanical Preserve by providing a setback and open space.
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate. D. Final location of mid-block connection determined as part of development review process.
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES IN TABLE 8.13
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| — | Neighborhood Boundary |
| - - | City Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| Existing Public Park | |
| Planned Public Park | |
| Existing Public Street to Remain | |
| Required Neighborhood Street | |
| ■■■ | Planned Greenway Connection |
| Existing Trail | |
| ●●● | Planned Off-Road Multi-Use Paths |
| ●●● | Planned On-Road Protected Bike Facilities |
| ●●● | Planned Sharrows |
| 🥾 | Possible Winkler Botanical Preserve Pedestrian Access |
⬚ figure
The intent of this Neighborhood is to increase the size of Dora Kelley Nature Park and retain a predominantly residential use throughout. Development will also provide expanded retail in the required and encouraged retail areas. New greenway connections will expand access to this Neighborhood’s open spaces, which will be consolidated together to create space for amenity improvements.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
New parks will provide an array of amenities, such as shade structures, sports courts, and flexible lawn areas.
New buildings will be oriented towards and connect with the planned open spaces and greenways. They will also help frame and define a network of streets.
Retail will be required and encouraged along sections of N. Beauregard Street and Reading Avenue.
| Subareas | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Maximum Commercial (SF) | Minimum Retail (SF) | Tier A Plan Building Height¹ (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities² | Minimum Size³ (SF) | |||||||
| 10A | Residential/ Commercial | 0.75 | 2.5 | 785,510 | Amount of retail will comply with minimum frontage and depth requirements | 110 - 130 | 23 | Event Space, Flexible Seating | 7,000 |
| 10B | Residential | 0.75 | 2.5 | 785,510 | Amount of retail will comply with minimum frontage and depth requirements | 110 - 130 | 25 | Natural Area, Trails | 71,000 |
| 10C | Residential | 0.75 | 2.5 | 785,510 | Amount of retail will comply with minimum frontage and depth requirements | 60 - 110 | 22 | Dog Park, Shade Structures | 26,000 |
| 10D | Residential | 0.75 | 2.0 | 21,355 | 0 | 60 | 24 | Tot Lot Playground, Shade Structures, Flexible Seating | 8,000 |
| 26 | Trails, Shade Structures, Small Multi-Purpose Courts, Athletic Practice Cages | 63,000 | |||||||
| 27 | Trails, Shade Structures, Exercise Play Features, Dog Exercise Area | 32,000 | |||||||
| 31 | Multi-Purpose Athletic Courts, Flexible Lawn Area | 17,000 | |||||||
| 10E | Residential | 0.75 | 2.0 | 21,355 | 0 | 60 | 28 | Natural Area, Trails | 318,000 |
| 29 | Flexible Seating Areas | 2,000 | |||||||
| 30 | Flexible Seating Areas, Flexible Lawn Area | 4,000 | |||||||
| 10F | Residential | 0.3 | 3.0 | N/A | N/A | 60 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 10G | Residential | 0.75 | 3.0 | N/A | N/A | 60 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
⬚ figure
LEGEND
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate. D. Additional residential units may be permitted on the land to be dedicated to the City at the intersection of N. Beauregard St. and Sanger Ave. if approved as part of the development review process.
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES IN TABLE 8.13
LEGEND
⬚ figure
Figure 8.10B: Garden Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network
⬚ figure
The intent of this Neighborhood is to provide an interconnected street grid and a mix of residential building types (multi-unit and townhouses), with access to the planned 23-acre Greenway Park and the Winkler Botanical Preserve through an enhanced visual and physical entrance. This Neighborhood also prioritizes restoring the Resource Protection Area (RPA).
⬚ figure
New open spaces will include amenities, such as flexible seating areas and flexible lawn areas.
⬚ figure
Residents will be provided better access to new and existing open spaces within this neighborhood.
⬚ figure
Residential development will consist of primarily lower-scale development types.
| Subarea | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Tier A Plan Building Height¹ (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities² | Minimum Size³ (SF) | |||||
| 11A | Residential | 0.75 | 2.0 | 45 - 60 | 33 | Trails, Small Multi-Purpose Athletic Court | 11,000 |
| 34 | Natural Areas, Trails | 740,000 | |||||
| 37 | Trails, Exercise Play Features, Playground | 15,000 | |||||
| 38 | Flexible Seating Areas, Shade Structures | 3,000 | |||||
| 11B | Residential | 0.75 | 45 - 60 | 32 | Flexible Seating Areas, Flexible Lawn Area | 7,000 | |
| 35 | Natural Areas, Trails | 250,000 | |||||
| 11C | Residential | 0.75 | 60 | 36 | Natural Areas, Trails | 39,000 |
LEGEND
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate. D. Final location of mid-block connection determined as part of development review process.
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES IN TABLE 8.13
⬚ figure
LEGEND
⬚ figure
Figure 8.11B: Greenway Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network
⬚ figure
The intent of this Neighborhood is to celebrate the existing Lebanon Union Cemetery as an important cultural element of the neighborhood and provide an additional public open space adjacent to the cemetery, both framed by new buildings. Development in this Neighborhood, including a new updated street grid, will require coordination with Fairfax County.
⬚ figure
Greenways and new streets will better connect this neighborhood to the rest of AlexWest and Fairfax County.
⬚ figure
New open spaces will be provided in areas where there are currently no public parks.
⬚ figure
New buildings will help frame a better connected street network and make this neighborhood more walkable than it is today.
| Subarea | Primary Land Use(s) | Base Residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Plan Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) | Required Ground Floor Retail | Tier A Plan Building Height¹ (FT) | Required Public Open Spaces | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Required Amenities² | Minimum Size³ (SF) | ||||||
| 12A | Residential/ Commercial | 1.25 | 3.0 | No | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 12B | Residential/ Commercial | 1.25 | 3.0 | No | 100 | 39 | Cultural Site, Historic Interpretation | 30,000 |
| 12C | Residential/ Commercial | 1.5 | 3.0 | No | 100 | 40 | Playground, Shade Structures | 10,000 |
| 12D | Residential/ Commercial | 1.5 | 3.0 | No | 100 | 41 | Multi-Purpose Athletic Courts, Shade Structures | 10,000 |
| 12E | Residential/ Commercial | 1.5 | 3.0 | No | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 12F | Residential/ Commercial | 1.5 | 3.0 | No | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 12G | Residential/ Commercial | 1.5 | 3.0 | No | 100 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| — | Neighborhood Boundary |
| - - | City Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| ■■■ | Building Block |
| ■■■ | Planned Public Park |
| ■■■ | Planned Greenway Connection |
| Existing Public Street to Remain | |
| Required Neighborhood Street | |
| Recommended Neighborhood Street | |
| Fairfax County Planned Streets | |
| Residential/Commercial Land Use | |
| Cemetery |
⬚ figure
NOTES: A. The Neighborhood Figures are a graphic implementation of Plan intent and Recommendations. B. The final configuration will be subject to compliance with the Plan Recommendations and Design Guidelines. C. Parcel and right-of-way boundaries are approximate.
SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES IN TABLE 8.13
Figure 8.12B: Union Neighborhood Pedestrian and Bike Network
⬚ figure
LEGEND
| — | Neighborhood Boundary |
| - - | City Boundary |
| — | Parcel |
| Cemetery | |
| Planned Public Park | |
| Existing Public Street to Remain | |
| Required Neighborhood Street | |
| Recommended Neighborhood Street | |
| Fairfax County Planned Streets | |
| ■■■ | Planned Greenway Connection |
| ●●● | Planned Off-Road Multi-Use Paths |
| ●●● | Planned On-Road Protected Bike Facilities |
| Note # | Note |
|---|---|
| 1 | See Figure 2.4: Building Heights for specific height recommendations. |
| 2 | Outdoor park amenities are to be finalized as part of the development review process and will be based on the most current needs assessment. |
| 3 | In addition to the publicly accessible parks and open space required in Figure 5.3, each residential development will provide a minimum of 25% on-site open space, including ground-level and above-grade open space. Residential developments that are not required to provide public parks and open space or developments that provide less than 10% as public parks and open space are expected to provide a greater proportion of at-grade open space as part of the 25% requirement. |
| 4 | For the purposes of this table, the 10% committed affordable housing requirement applies to the residential floor area above the base residential maximum FAR. |
| 5 | Floor Area Ratio (FAR) will be calculated on applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. |
| 6 | In subarea 10A of the Garden Neighborhood, where development is allowed to include residential or commercial uses, if the uses are entirely residential, development will provide an additional 10,000 square feet of consolidated public open space within the neighborhood to be consolidated with one of the other planned parks. |
| 7 | For purposes of this table, the table assumes 300 square feet per room for hotels. |
| 8 | City recreational facilities may be located within the open space recommended by the Plan. |
| 9 | The location of the required streets will be constructed as generally depicted in Figure 4.2 and in Figures and Tables 8.1–8.12, subject to site constraints and compliance with all applicable provisions of the Design Guidelines. The location of recommended streets must be constructed as generally depicted in Figure 4.2 and in Figures and Tables 8.1–8.12, however their final location can be determined during the development review process. |
| 10 | The size, shape and location of the park(s) are depicted for illustrative purposes. The final shape and location within each neighborhood will be determined as part of the development process subject to the size and amenities recommended by the Plan. |
| 11 | Up to an additional 1.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) can be granted for the provision of replacement parking for existing building(s) that will be retained long-term. The additional FAR for parking does not trigger the affordable housing recommendations. The parking structures will be subject to all applicable Design Guidelines and will not preclude other recommendations of the Plan such as streets and parks. |
| 12 | For any neighborhood(s) under common ownership, density (FAR) will be based on the entire tract of land consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Density (FAR) may be transferred within the neighborhood(s) subject to all applicable zoning provisions and the street, land use, open space and building height recommendations of the Plan. |
Ensure that the Plan is implemented in a timely manner and tasks are prioritized so that the community’s objectives can be met over the 20-year timeframe of the Plan.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The Plan establishes a 20-year framework to guide future planning, infrastructure, parks, and development throughout the Plan area, with the expectation that, given the scale and scope of the Plan Recommendations, they will occur in phases. In addition to establishing a land use strategy intended to expand housing opportunity and affordability to help minimize displacement, the Plan also implements community amenities and infrastructure to mitigate impacts from development and to provide public benefits within the Plan area.
Funding responsibility for the Plan-recommended community benefits is outlined in Table 9.1: Community Benefits + Funding Responsibility. Community benefits that are the responsibility of development will be provided in-kind, rather than funded through monetary contributions provided by the developer. Larger infrastructure projects, such as a new recreation facility, will be implemented by the City with grant funding and/or will compete with projects for funding through the City's 10-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Given constrained resources and the importance of implementing improvements strategically and efficiently, Table 9.2: Prioritization of City- and Grant-funded Projects provides guidance for prioritizing the improvements that require City and/or grant funding.
| Community Benefit | Funding Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Expand Housing Affordability | |
| a. Ten percent of additional residential development shall be provided as committed affordable housing, and contributions to the Housing Trust Fund shall be provided on base development. | Developers in-kind and contributions to the City Housing Trust Fund |
| b. Preservation and expanded/deepened housing affordability pursued through partnerships, co-location, and other tools and opportunities. | City, State, Federal, Non-Profit and Other Partners |
| Enhance Mobility and Safety | |
| a. Enhancements to Pedestrian and Bicycle Network as depicted in Figure 4.6 | Developers in-kind |
| b. Street Network as depicted in Figure 4.2 | Developers in-kind |
| c. Southern Towers Transit facility | City, Grants, Property owner provides land in-kind |
| d. Seminary Road and N. Beauregard Street Intersection Improvements | City, Grants, Developers in-kind |
| e. Mobility Enhancements as depicted in Figure 4.9 | City, Grants |
| Incorporate City Facilities | |
| a. Dedication of land for a City facility as depicted in Figure 8.10A (southwest corner of N. Beauregard Street and Sanger Avenue) | Developers in-kind |
| b. Recreation facility (or equivalent) construction | City |
| Enhance and Expand Open Space | |
| a. Parks and Open Space Network as depicted in both Figure 5.3 and Tables 8.1–8.12 | Developers in-kind |
| b. Access improvements to existing parks | City |
| Project (Funded by CIP &/or Grants) | Priority (1 = Highest Priority) | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mobility/Safety Enhancements as depicted in Figure 4.9 | ||
| • N. Beauregard Street / Sanger Avenue | 3 | Coordinate with William Ramsay Safe Routes to School project and Transitway implementation | |
| • N. Beauregard Street / Rayburn Avenue | 2 | Coordinate with Transitway implementation | |
| • N. Beauregard Street / Seminary Road | 1 | Grant funding for design has been secured; prioritize funding for construction funding; development will provide right-of-way and frontage improvements | |
| • N. Beauregard Street / Braddock Road | 3 | Coordinate with NVCC development and transitway implementation | |
| • N. Beauregard Street / King Street | 1 | Funding secured and design complete, construction anticipated in 2025 | |
| • Seminary Road / Mark Center Drive | 1 | High priority for pedestrian safety improvements | |
| • Seminary Road / Library Lane | 1 | High priority for pedestrian safety improvements | |
| • King Street / Dawes Avenue | 1 | Coordinate with Fairfax Route 7 improvements, NVCC, adjacent development | |
| • King Street / N. Hampton Drive | 2 | Medium priority for pedestrian safety improvements | |
| • King Street / Park Center Drive | 1 | High priority for pedestrian safety improvements | |
| • King Street / S. 28th Street | 1 | High priority for pedestrian safety improvements | |
| 2 | Missing connections in Street Network not provided by development | 2 | Medium priority as needed |
| 3 | Southern Towers Transit facility | 1 | High priority for implementation; Grant funding secured; transit access safety improvements high priority |
| 4 | Bike & Pedestrian Network connections not provided by development | 2 | Medium priority as needed |
| 5 | Construct Recreation facility | 1 | High priority, high cost, high return. Facility is needed now; requires CIP planning. |
| 6 | Provide new entrances to Winkler Botanical Preserve | 1 | High priority, low cost, high return |
| 7 | Improve access to James Mulligan Park and other existing City Parks | 2 | Medium priority; coordinate with development or improvements at adjacent ARHA site |
| 8 | Pursue all applicable state and federal grant funds for BRT/WET | 1 | The City will pursue all applicable state and federal grant funds for BRT/WET |
Successful implementation of the Plan's Recommendations, including the benefits listed above, requires a variety of implementation actions with varying responsibilities and timeframes for completion as shown in Table 9.3: Implementation Rubric. The rubric provides a framework for tracking and reporting progress over the Plan's lifespan after adoption. Each action includes an implementation timeframe: short-term (0-5 years), mid-term (6-10 years), long-term (11-20 years), and ongoing (0-20+ years). This table does not include site specific infrastructure-related improvements typically required as part of any development, such as undergrounding utilities, stormwater, sanitary sewer, open space, and streetscape enhancements.
| Task # | Rec. # | Implementation Action | Responsibility | Short-term | Mid-term | Long-term | On-going |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAND USE | |||||||
| 1 | 13 | Dedicate the land identified in Figure 8.10A to the City for a future community facility. | Developers | 🟡 | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ |
| 2 | 1 | Per Figure 2.2, prioritize development in the Focus Area, including on existing surface parking lots and underutilized commercial sites. | Developers | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🟡 |
| 3 | 2, 5, 6 | Provide Residential, Commercial, and ground floor retail uses as depicted in Figure 2.3 and Figures and Tables 8.1–8.12. | Developers | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🟡 |
| 4 | N/A | As part of the next Long Range Planning Work Program, propose a citywide initiative to evaluate land use strategies to assist small businesses. | City | 🟡 | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ |
| HOUSING | |||||||
| 5 | 14 - 17 | Provide committed affordable housing units and contributions. | Developers | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🔵 |
| 6 | 18 | Develop coordinated affordable housing plans for properties involving multiple residential sites. | Developers | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🔵 |
| 7 | 22 | Produce and preserve new committed affordable housing units through partnerships and other tools and resources. | City & Partners | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🔵 |
| 8 | 23 | Pursue tenant support and protections through community partners, programs, voluntary commitments from developers/property owners, and future legislative tools. | City & Partners | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🔵 |
| Task # | Rec. # | Implementation Action | Responsibility | Short- term | Mid- term | Long- term | On going |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOUSING | |||||||
| 9 | 24 | Provide technical support to condominium and HOA communities to promote housing stability and ownership affordability. | City & Partners | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🔵 |
| 10 | N/A | In collaboration with the community, develop criteria for the analysis of displacement impacts of residential development. | City & Partners | 🔵 | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ |
| 11 | N/A | Include the analysis of displacement impacts of residential development in DSUP or DSP staff reports and the annual Implementation Report. | City | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🔵 |
| MOBILITY | |||||||
| 12 | 25, 27 | Construct streets, blocks, and connections as depicted in Figures 4.2 - 4.5 as part of development. | Developers | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🔴 |
| 13 | 29, 30, 34 | Implement bike and pedestrian improvements as depicted in Figure 4.6 as part of development, including the connections that link to the network, all pedestrian crossings (including sidewalks), and internal non-auto connections. | Developers | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🔴 |
| 14 | 31 | Provide and support access to shared mobility options as part of development. | Developers | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🔴 |
| 15 | 33 | Coordinate to provide additional pedestrian and bicycle connections not shown in Figure 4.6. | City, Developers | ⚪ | ⚪ | ⚪ | 🔴 |
| 16 | 28 | Address mobility-related issues in the areas identified in Figure 4.9. | City | 🔴 | 🔴 | 🔴 | ⚪ |
| 17 | 35 | Improve the intersection of Seminary Road and N. Beauregard Street as generally depicted in Figure 4.10. | City, Developers | ⚪ | 🔴 | ⚪ | ⚪ |
| 18 | 37 | Provide land area and infrastructure to connect to the new transit facility. | Developers | 🔴 | 🔴 | ⚪ | ⚪ |
| 19 | 37 | Construct a new transit facility in Southern Towers as generally depicted in Figure 8.5A. | City | ⚪ | 🔴 | 🔴 | ⚪ |
| Task # | Rec. # | Implementation Action | Responsibility | Short- term | Mid- term | Long- term | On going |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOBILITY | |||||||
| 20 | 38 | Provide all necessary transit access and amenities to mitigate impacts of development. | Developers | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● |
| 21 | 39 | Coordinate with transit partners to explore improvements to transit operations. | City | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● |
| PARKS + OPEN SPACE | |||||||
| 22 | 40 | Provide at-grade publicly accessible public parks/open space as generally depicted in Figure 5.3 and specified in Tables 8.1–8.12. | Developers | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● |
| 23 | 41 | Locate a new City Recreation Center, or similar facility, within the Plan area. | City | ○ | ● | ● | ○ |
| 24 | 42 | Implement access improvements to Winkler Botanical Preserve, James Mulligan, and other existing public and public easement parks. | City | ● | ● | ○ | ○ |
| SUSTAINABILITY | |||||||
| 25 | 49 | Provide onsite tree canopy consistent with City Policy. | City, Developers | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● |
| 26 | 50 | Comply with the City’s Green Building Policy. | City, Developers | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● |
| 27 | 51 | Explore opportunities for the implementation of district-wide sustainability measures and approaches. | Developers | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● |
| GENERAL | |||||||
| 28 | N/A | Three (3) years after the adoption of the Plan, staff will provide a status update to the Planning Commission and City Council on the implementation of the Plan. The Planning Commission and City Council may consider modifications to enhance the efficacy of the Plan at that time. | City | ● | ○ | ○ | ○ |
This page is intentionally left blank.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
American Indian Camp in the Uplands
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Stone tools from the Stonegate site
The history of AlexWest dates back long before contemporary historical records start. Beginning approximately 13,000 years ago, Native Americans established small camps along creeks, frequently traversing the area for hunting and gathering. Archaeological surveys and excavations have identified the locations of 24 Native American settlements in and around the previous Beauregard Small Area Plan boundaries, accounting for more than 70 percent of the total number of Native American settlements discovered in Alexandria. Sites that have been identified include the present-day Mark Center, the Winkler Botanical Preserve, and Stonegate residential community. The earliest identifiable artifacts found at Stonegate date from 5500 B.C.
The arrival of European colonists in the early 1600s fundamentally shifted the course of Alexandria’s, and AlexWest’s, history. At that time, a large affiliation of Native American communities called the Conoy Chiefdom lived along the banks of the Potomac and farther inland, likely including the area that is now AlexWest. Historical documents indicate that by the late 1600s, these communities had largely disappeared.
In 1669, much of AlexWest was granted by King Charles II to seven supporters, eventually passing to Thomas Lord Fairfax, who controlled all shares by the end of the seventeenth century and continued to issue land grants.
⬚ figure
Cabin in Historic Fairfax County
Research suggests that in 1741, William Henry Terrett acquired 982 acres that encompassed the Mark Center property. Archaeologists have found remnants of a small, two-room, early-nineteenth century wood dwelling, probably occupied by slaves or tenants of William Henry Terrett, located between what is now the BRAC building and the parking structure in the northwest. Additionally, the remains of a log cabin, most likely a tenant home occupied from about 1790 to 1830, were found on the Stonegate development property.
AlexWest includes several possible Civil War-era sites within or immediately adjacent to the Plan area. Pre-Civil War sites found included a cabin for likely slave tenants in the area where the Winkler Botanical Preserve is located. Despite the fact that AlexWest was outside of the ring of protective forts and batteries surrounding the Capital during the Civil War, there is evidence of significant military activity and camps in the area, both Union and Confederate. The area where Dora Kelley Nature Park is located was once called Lebanon prior to the Civil War and included a church and one-room schoolhouse. During the War, there were several Union Army units who occupied this area, and one unit burned the church to the ground in retaliation for the Union Army's losses at the Battle of Bull Run. Today, the cemetery, which is maintained by the City, is all that remains of where the Lebanon Union church once stood.
Despite active habitation and development, Western Alexandria remained primarily agricultural until urbanization began in the 1940s. Major residential development built between the 1940s and the 1960s included Shirley Gardens (today known as the Upland Park neighborhood), Southern Towers, Seminary Towers, and the Hamlets East and West. The City of Alexandria annexed AlexWest from Fairfax in 1952 at the time of the development of the Henry G. Shirley Memorial Highway (I-395), a new commuting option for federal employees at the time.
The Alexandria neighborhood Fairlington, included in the Annexation in 1952, was part of a 1940s wartime effort to accommodate U.S. Department of Defense employees and their families through planned, federally financed housing. In 1999, the now-private community was designated a Historic District on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).
Throughout the 1950s and 60s, AlexWest developed into a suburban area of residential high rises and single-unit homes, coupled with commercial shopping centers and other community amenities, including six educational and recreational institutions. The Alexandria campus of the Northern Virginia Community College opened in 1973. The combination of shopping and retail enhanced AlexWest’s local economy.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
2022 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates, US Census Bureau
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
2022 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates, US Census Bureau
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
2022 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates, US Census Bureau
AlexWest is a large and ethnically, racially, and socioeconomically diverse collection of neighborhoods. Given the high degree of overall diversity, the City conducted preliminary engagement with residents and community organizations to ensure that the planning process was wide-reaching, informative, and accessible to people of all backgrounds. Based on this preliminary engagement, the City developed a comprehensive, five-phase community engagement strategy that implemented current best practices in engagement, engaged all parts of the community in ways that reduced barriers to participation, and provided equitable opportunities for community members to participate – ensuring that all voices are included and heard.
⬚ figure
Appendix | 143
Key aspects of the community engagement strategy included:
The City launched preliminary engagement in Summer 2022, when City staff reached out to over 40 community organizations, community groups, business associations, 37 multifamily residential properties, multiple private and public property owners (including Northern Virginia Community College [(NVCC]), several faith-based organizations, and nearby jurisdictions (Fairfax and Arlington Counties) to introduce the planning process for AlexWest. Preliminary engagement activities included setting up the Plan’s official webpage on alexandriava. gov, establishing an instant message group using WhatsApp, and attending informal meetings to answer community stakeholders’ questions about the process and get preliminary feedback. Preliminary engagement identified opportunities for partnerships between the City and local organizations to better spread awareness about the AlexWest planning process, served as an additional communication outlet between residents and the City, and laid the foundation for the subsequent engagement conducted by the City. Preliminary engagement also included establishing what the AlexWest Plan would and would not address and how stakeholders could be involved throughout the planning process to influence decision-making.
The AlexWest planning process officially kicked off in November 2022. Phase 1, “Launch & Listen”, included 12 local pop-up events, various stakeholder meetings, one community meeting, and Community Poll #1, in which almost 1,000 people participated. High-level takeaways from the poll included that the community valued its diversity and culture, enjoyed proximity to other activity centers, such as Washington D.C. and Pentagon City, and had concerns over traffic and congestion, unaffordable housing, cost of utilities, fear of displacement, access to parks and green spaces, and overall safety.
Phase 2, “Listen & Frame”, took place from March 2023 through July 2023, and included three community meetings, an introduction of the Plan topics, local office hours where community could provide feedback, and a second community poll. Community Poll #2 had over 200 participants, and the poll feedback was used to inform the Draft Plan Objectives, guiding statements broken down by key topics such as Housing, Transportation, Parks, and Land Use. Together, these objectives generated the foundation of the Plan. During the development of the Draft Plan Objectives, prioritizing housing affordability and addressing displacement emerged as defining elements of community members’ feedback.
Phase 3, “Listen & Develop”, took place from July 2023 through November 2023 and included one community meeting, 10 meetings between AlexWest property owners and tenants, numerous meetings with community organizations, local pop-up events, and three community open houses in key locations in the Plan area. During Phase 3, City staff began developing planning concepts focusing on Housing, Transportation and Mobility, Parks and Open Space, Land Use, and Sustainability and were informed by the Draft Plan Objectives, as well as community feedback gathered during Phases 1 and 2. The three community open houses provided opportunities for community members and other stakeholders to actively engage with staff on these various planning concepts, provide feedback, and enjoy games, food, and music. Each open house included visual boards conveying the planning concepts by topic and offered participants opportunities to “dot” vote on board questions and use sticky notes to provide written feedback. An online survey accompanied the open houses and provided participants unable to attend in-person the opportunity to weigh in. In general, open house feedback focused on affordable housing, traffic safety, business and retail types, park and open space types, and sustainability challenges and opportunities, which directly contributed to the development of the Plan Recommendations.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Phase 4, known as “Listen & Refine”, took place from November 2023 through April 2024 and included three community meetings, additional meetings with community organizations and civic associations, and the release of the draft Plan Recommendations. Community feedback from the polls and open houses, as well as the expertise of City departments, formed the backbone of the draft Plan Recommendations, which were additionally refined following a virtual public comment period. Community members submitted feedback on the draft recommendations through an interactive ArcGIS StoryMap, several listening sessions and meetings with community organizations and civic associations, and to City staff directly through phone or email. The City incorporated feedback gathered during this comment period into the next draft of the recommendations, presented at an April community meeting and accessible on the Plan website. Phase 4 also included a January work session for City Council and the Planning Commission and presentations to other Citywide Boards and Commissions.
The fifth phase, known as “Listen & Finalize”, took place from June 2024 through September 2024 and included the release of the full draft Plan, including graphics and text, in June 2024.
Throughout the planning process, the City prioritized consistent and transparent communication with all constituents, working to ensure that all community stakeholders could reliably and efficiently receive planning updates and be notified when and how they could participate in the process. The AlexWest planning process incorporated community input at every stage, including before the official launch, which resulted in a Plan that reflects key opportunities, concerns, and ideas that originated from the AlexWest community.
Plan Objectives were derived from community input and best practices. Draft Plan Objectives were shared with the community at the March 2023 community meeting. This was followed by a public comment period and staff shared updated Draft Plan Objectives based on community input in May 2023. Plan Objectives served as the basis for Plan Recommendations which can be found in the Plan. Separated into topics, the full objectives are as follows:
• In coordination with this planning process, address both traffic congestion and safety for all users at the Seminary Road and N. Beauregard Street intersection. • Provide clear information about other current projects like the West End Transitway, Beauregard Multiuse Trail, Safe Routes to School improvements, and others.
Ensuring adequate sanitary sewer infrastructure capacity is a critical aspect of planning for the future to protect the health of the community and waterways. In AlexWest, there are two cross-jurisdictional sanitary sewersheds: the AlexRenew Service area and the Arlington County Service area. The two sewersheds are separated by Seminary Road, as shown in Figure A.2: Existing Sanitary Sewershed. Wastewater, or sanitary sewage, is channeled via collector pipes owned either by the City or Arlington County and then sent to the nearest pumping station before going on to a wastewater treatment facility. Analysis of forecasted development indicates that there is adequate capacity in the sewershed. New development will comply with the most current requirements for sanitary infrastructure.
⬚ figure
This page is intentionally left blank.
Approved by City Council November 16, 2024 Adopted by Ordinance #5565 on December 14, 2024