The Public Meeting Index

The Ocala City Council held a special meeting on September 9, 2026, at 5:00 PM in City Hall Council Chambers to adopt tentative millage rates and budgets for the city and its downtown development districts for Fiscal Year 2026-27. The council unanimously approved five resolutions and heard public comments regarding the city's community sponsorship funding for nonprofits. Key decisions included maintaining current millage rates and proceeding with nonprofit funding at last year's levels while directing staff to develop a new process for future allocations. Public Comments & Testimony - Lauren Diorio, CEO of the Community Foundation, addressed the council about the proposed move of community sponsorship funding to a reserve. She clarified that the foundation takes no administrative fee from city funds and presented a paper outlining a process for selecting nonprofits. She expressed willingness to help design a future system and defended the use of taxpayer dollars for community investment. Mayor Marciano and Council Member Hilty expressed support for the foundation's role, with the mayor noting the increasing need in the community. - Wayne Little Jr., representing the MLK Commission, thanked the council for past support and requested restoration of $10,000 in funding for the MLK observance. He highlighted the commission's scholarship program, which has awarded approximately $100,000 to over 175 students since 2000. He asked for at least partial funding or continued in-kind assistance (police, traffic control, facilities) if full allocation was not possible. Discussion Items - Nonprofit Funding and Future Process: The council debated the $140,000 held in the budget for four nonprofits (Community Foundation, MLK Commission, MCA, Veterans Helping Veterans) plus the Community Foundation. Council Member Dreyer requested a comprehensive list of all in-kind donations (e.g., police and fire support for events, discounted leases) to understand the full picture. City Manager Peter Lee proposed bringing back that information first, then working on contractual agreements with performance measures. Council Member Hilty and Mayor Marciano favored funding the nonprofits this year as previously done, with a year's notice before changing the process. - City Manager's Guidance: Lee stated the budget money could be moved without impacting reserves and recommended holding the funds in an operating account pending council direction. He agreed to bring back an informational item on all in-kind services and then draft agreements with each group. Key Outcomes - Resolution 2026-54 (Fire Assessments): Adopted unanimously (5-0) at 5:06 PM. The resolution reimposes fire assessment rates for FY 2026-27 based on a revenue target of $18.2 million, using the same methodology as the current fiscal year. - Resolution 2026-158 (Downtown Development District Millage Rates): Adopted unanimously (5-0) at 5:06 PM. Tentative millage rates set at 1.7185 (District A), 1.6332 (District B), and 1.4699 (District C), all above rollback rates. - Budget Resolution 2026-159 (Downtown Development Fund Budget): Adopted unanimously (5-0) at 5:07 PM. Tentative budget of $856,159 for FY 2026-27. - Resolution 2026-160 (City Millage Rate): Adopted unanimously (5-0) at 5:30 PM. Tentative millage rate set at 6.6177, above the rollback rate of 6.3727 by 3.84%, to support additional critical employees and cost pressures. - Budget Resolution 2026-161 (City Budget): Adopted unanimously (5-0) at 5:32 PM. Tentative total budget of $1,269,705,929 (General Fund $27,375,696) for FY 2026-27. - Nonprofit Funding Direction: The council agreed to proceed with nonprofit sponsorship funding as in the prior year for FY 2026-27. Staff will compile a full inventory of in-kind donations and return with draft agreements with performance measures by October 6, 2026. A new process for selecting nonprofits will be developed for the following fiscal year.

Date: September 9, 2026 Time: 5:00 PM (called to order at 5:06 PM) Location: Council Chambers, City Hall The board considered four new business items: a residential carport/shed, a YMCA addition/renovation, and two commercial developments on Washington Street involving demolition of existing dwellings. Public comments focused on preserving the historic Southmaid House (c. 1739) at 797 Washington Street. All items were approved, with conditions on materials and preservation. Consent Calendar - None (all items were discussed individually). Public Comments & Testimony - Christina Wasch (Chair, Middletown Sustainability Commission; President, Jonas Center for Earth and Art; member, Historical Society) spoke in favor of preserving the Southmaid House at 797 Washington Street. She detailed its historical significance (Beers Southmaid funeral home, connection to Judge Seth Wetmore House, early female physician Dr. Lucy Waterman Southmaid) and urged either on-site retention or a guarantee that the house be rebuilt after dismantling. She noted that Middletown lost many historic structures during urban renewal, while Newburyport’s preservation later boosted tourism. - Renee Treber (Chair, Historic Preservation Committee, Middlesex County Historical Society) emphasized the architectural rarity of the Southmaid House (one of only six center‑chimney colonials built 1735–1745 remaining in town). She supported on‑site reuse or, if dismantled, reconstruction within Middletown. - Steve Beelitz (Preservationist, 40+ years experience; head of preservation for Glastonbury) reported that after inspecting the house three times, he found it structurally sound and easy to restore. He advocated keeping it on site as office space or, if moved, having the developer (Chick‑fil‑A) contribute to its relocation. He noted the house is a “beauty” and could be the second‑oldest in Middletown. - Bill Howard (Retired attorney, involved in the 1970s “Save the South Green” lawsuit) supported preservation, citing the loss of historic buildings during urban renewal. He argued that a drive‑in restaurant adds little to New England ambiance and that this house cannot be replaced. Discussion Items 4.1 – Proposed Carport and Shed at 208 College Street (DVD Zone) Applicant Jeff Bianco requested approval for a detached combined carport and shed to accommodate aging‑in‑place needs. The structure would be minimally visible behind existing trees (Japanese maple, possibly a large maple). Materials: vertical wood siding (T‑111 or cedar), dark stain, asphalt shingles matching the house. Board members asked for final color selection and material clarity. The applicant agreed to submit a color sample to staff. 4.2 – YMCA Exterior Design at 85 Union Street (MXC Zone) Project architect Rock Patito (QA+M) presented a revised design after earlier 2024 submission. Changes included: removal of a roof deck, reduction of glass, and addition of square footage. The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) reviewed and approved the design, as the YMCA is deemed historically significant and SHPO contributed $5 million. Materials: metal panel (white), brick samples, EIFS (on less visible elevations), and storefront glazing. Board members noted the EIFS locations and accepted the design given SHPO’s oversight. 4.3 & 4.4 – Demolition and New Construction at 797 & 809 Washington Street (B‑2 Zone) Discussed jointly. Attorney Rich Carella (Updike, Kelly & Spellacy) represented owners Evan and Scott O’Brien. The combined 2.55‑acre site would be regraded (20‑foot grade change) to accommodate: - 4.4 (809 Washington Street): 2,500 SF credit union (Dutch Point Credit Union) with a 2‑lane drive‑through. The existing 1960s cape will be demolished. Dutch Point currently operates in a 1,700 SF basement space with no visibility or drive‑through; the new branch would better serve city employees and residents. Chamber of Commerce voted in support. - 4.3 (797 Washington Street): 5,020 SF quick‑service restaurant (likely Chick‑fil‑A) with a 2‑lane drive‑through. The existing 1739 Southmaid House saltbox and barn would be removed. Attorney Carella detailed a preservation plan: a contract with William Butterley (20‑year experience, historic barn/restoration specialist) to dismantle, catalog, and store the house, then rebuild it in Guilford or Madison, CT within a few years. Butterley’s past projects include moving 1750s houses from New Hampshire and Maine. The board expressed concern about enforceability; the attorney stated the city could require documentation before issuing a building permit. The development also includes intersection improvements (new signal, turning lanes, elimination of Liberty Bank’s current exit), dark‑sky compliant LED lighting, street trees (eastern redbud), and sidewalks. Stormwater management meets 2024 CT Standards. The board voted separately on 4.4 first, then 4.3. Key Outcomes - 4.1 – Carport/Shed (208 College Street): Approved (motion by Wendy Smith, seconded). Condition: final color selection and material details to be submitted to staff for review. - 4.2 – YMCA Exterior (85 Union Street): Approved (motion by Wendy Smith, seconded). Board noted confidence in SHPO review. - 4.4 – Credit Union at 809 Washington Street: Approved (motion by Wendy Smith, seconded). Unanimous (all in favor). - 4.3 – Restaurant at 797 Washington Street: Approved (motion by Wendy Smith, seconded). Conditions: (1) the Southmaid House must be dismantled and preserved per the Butterley contract, not demolished; (2) documentation of the dismantling process (mapping, numbering) to be provided to the city; (3) a building permit for the new restaurant will not be issued until the house is removed and documented. The board also noted that the final design, materials, and colors for the restaurant building will be subject to future review by the Design Review & Preservation Board. - Minutes of June 10, 2026 regular meeting: Approved unanimously. - Adjournment: 7:00 PM (estimated).

The Rules and Open Government Committee (ROGC) and Committee of the Whole met on September 9, 2026, at 2:00 PM in a hybrid format. The committee reviewed the final agenda for the September 15, 2026 City Council meeting, the draft agenda for September 22, 2026, approved the consent calendar, and discussed a referral to evaluate policy options regarding Council transparency and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). Consent Calendar - Approved three items: The Public Record for August 27 – September 3, 2026 (received and filed); the Auditor’s Office Monthly Report of Activities for August 2026 (approved); and a request to authorize travel for Mayor Mahan to attend a Bloomberg Center for Cities convening, to accept travel payments, and to excuse the Mayor’s absence from the September 29, 2026 Council meeting (approved). The motion carried 5-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Brian (in-person): Spoke on multiple agenda items. He noted he had sent an email containing concerns about the agenda and consent calendar items and requested guidance on how the public should submit emails (by topic vs. single email). He expressed general support for transparency, stating that distrust of government is unhealthy and that transparency helps build trust. He also supported the NDA policy discussion, saying the more transparent government is, the better. - Jordan Mullen (virtual): Commented on the NDA item. He suggested the policy should apply not only to council members but also to their staff and senior city staff. He also asked whether previous NDAs could be released retroactively or a database compiled. He questioned why the policy should be limited to council members when all city staff should be covered. Discussion Items - Council Transparency and Private Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) – Referral (Item C-1, ROGC 26-315): - Councilmember Ortiz introduced the memorandum, co-signed by Councilmembers Cohen, Candelas, Campos, and Casey. The memo seeks to direct the City Manager’s Office, in coordination with the City Attorney’s Office and City Clerk’s Office, to evaluate and return with policy options that would: (1) prohibit Council members from signing NDAs concerning projects subject to City approval; (2) prohibit persons/entities seeking City action from conditioning access to project information on signing an NDA; and (3) establish a City process to review confidential information without requiring individual Council members to sign NDAs. - Councilmember Ortiz stated the intent is to give residents confidence in government transparency, noting that even though only one recent incident (the Google decision) involved NDAs, perception matters. He referenced other municipalities (Franklin Township, Indiana; multiple cities in Wisconsin, Missouri, Ohio, Alabama) that have been asked to sign NDAs, particularly regarding data centers. - Vice Mayor Foley questioned whether a policy is necessary since she had never been asked to sign an NDA. Councilmember Ortiz explained that the policy would codify common sense and address potential future perception issues. Vice Mayor Foley also asked whether the policy should apply to chiefs of staff and staff members; Ortiz indicated openness to that suggestion. - Chair Cohen noted that early project discussions can be candid and not yet public, but once a project is formally before the Council, all proceedings are public. He supported the memo as a way to document existing practices in light of public skepticism. - Assistant City Manager Lee Wilcox confirmed the item would go to workload analysis, with timing likely for the September 30 ROGC meeting (or possibly the next week). - The committee voted to approve the referral subject to workload analysis. Motion carried 5-0. Key Outcomes - Agenda Reviews: Approved the final agenda for September 15, 2026 (4-0) and the draft agenda for September 22, 2026 (4-0). No changes were made to the agendas. - Consent Calendar: Approved all three consent items (5-0). - NDA Referral: Approved the referral to evaluate policy options on Council transparency and NDAs, subject to workload analysis. The policy options will be brought back to the ROGC on September 30, 2026 (or earlier if possible). - No Open Forum: No items were raised under Open Forum.

The Ocala Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) Agency Board held a special meeting at 4:45 p.m. on Wednesday, September 9, 2026, at Ocala City Hall. The board considered four budget resolutions adopting Fiscal Year 2026-27 budgets for the East Ocala, Downtown, North Magnolia, and West Ocala redevelopment subarea funds. The city clerk announced that the total of the four subarea fund budgets is $14,787,414. All four resolutions passed unanimously by roll-call vote. No minutes for the meeting were available; this summary relies on the agenda and the raw transcript. Budget Resolutions (Agenda Items 4a–4d) - 4a – CRA-BR-2026-101 (East Ocala Redevelopment Subarea Fund): Adopted in the amount of $3,437,260. Motion made, seconded, and passed unanimously. - 4b – CRA-BR-2026-102 (Downtown Redevelopment Subarea Fund): Adopted in the amount of $2,058,789. Motion made, seconded, and passed unanimously. - 4c – CRA-BR-2026-103 (North Magnolia Redevelopment Subarea Fund): Adopted in the amount of $1,996,077 as read during the motion. Note: the agenda lists this amount as $1,966,077, so there is a $30,000 discrepancy between the agenda and the transcript; the clerk's announced total of $14,787,414 matches the agenda amount rather than the amount read aloud. - 4d – CRA-BR-2026-104 (West Ocala Redevelopment Subarea Fund): Adopted in the amount of $7,325,288. Motion made, seconded, and passed unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were offered during the public comment period, and no board members asked questions or raised concerns about the budget resolutions. Key Outcomes - All four FY 2026-27 CRA subarea budgets were approved unanimously (5-0): members voting aye were Hilty, Dreyer, Musleh, Mansfield, and Bethea. - The board was called to order at 4:45 p.m. and voted on the resolutions at approximately 4:46 p.m., 4:48 p.m., 4:48 p.m., and 4:49 p.m., after which the meeting was adjourned. - Public notice for the September 9, 2026 meeting was given on August 12, 2026 on the City of Ocala website.

On September 9, 2026, at 9:45 AM, the Prince George's County Council held its second fall listening session. Council Chair Crystal Orieva (District 7) and Vice Chair Eric Olson (District 3) hosted the session, which focused on hearing resident concerns and providing updates on recent council achievements. The meeting also featured information about the Cannabis Restoration Board survey. Public Comments & Testimony - Nancy Feisner (Indivisible) praised the council's immigration package, stating her group authored the legislative language. She requested the council's assistance in securing a meeting with County Executive Aisha Braveboy to discuss voter suppression efforts ahead of November 3rd. Chair Orieva agreed to help schedule the meeting. - Sarah Hines (Route One Corridor Indivisible) expressed concern about a permit granted to the DHS legal advisors office at 6505 Bellcrest Road, arguing it could be used for immigration enforcement despite the council's legislation preventing ICE staging. She asked the council to help rescind the permit. - Linda Green (Mount Rainier, Hyattsville Resistance) echoed concerns about the Bellcrest building, noting nearby Howard University dorm and community college students are at risk. She urged the council to rescind the permit. - Annette Williams (District 2 senior) voiced frustration over high property taxes, saying the senior discount was halted. She asked the council to restore relief. - Miss Bender (Hyattsville) recounted confusion over the LD tax program eligibility and asked for a broader, simpler program. - Taylor Frazier McComb (District 2) criticized the lack of school transportation for 10,000 children, the condition of older schools, and the council's allowance of data centers at Landover Mall. She also questioned councilmember Fisher's donations from data center lobbyists. She urged investment in youth programs using cannabis funds. - Mr. Pertuna (social worker) raised the issue of seniors being scammed, noting a lack of response from authorities. Vice Chair Olson mentioned the sheriff's efforts and a scheduled senior scam awareness event. - Nancy Coleman (library associate, Hyattsville Branch) highlighted frozen positions, lack of raises, and reduced library hours, asking for increased investment. - Norman Lasama (Bladensburg Library) echoed the call for investment, describing library services including citizenship classes and job help. - Gay Moore (speaker) supported library investment, noting free access to books and technology. - Douglas Steinberg (Chillum, volunteer master gardener) reported that farmers market vendors are leaving due to high permit costs compared to Montgomery County and DC. He asked for permit fee reduction. - Magali Salas (Adelphi Hills Community Association) described the decrepit Metzrod Plaza, with trash, graffiti, and vagrancy. She asked for a strategy to address the mall. - Zach Hess (University Park) expressed concern about Flock cameras, stating data could be used by ICE and that cameras require data centers. Vice Chair Olson confirmed the county does not use Flock cameras and expressed civil liberties concerns. - Calvin Brooks (Beltsville) opposed data centers, proposing instead a hub for small businesses to park work vehicles. He criticized high taxes and lack of services. - Paul Rowe (District 2, retired) repeated senior property tax concerns, noting the cost of the tax credit is a small fraction of the budget. He asked the council to fully fund it. - Magdalena Green (Lewisdale) complained about parking on lawns, work trucks on narrow streets, and disrespect from police. She asked for enforcement. - Lillian Walker (Lewisdale) asked for county assistance to install a railing at her home after being told it was required. - Teresa Imordino (81-year-old retired social worker) criticized property tax increases and lack of in-home services for seniors in the county, contrasting with Montgomery County. - Ilian Contreras (lifelong county resident, former leasing consultant) argued the 5.7% rent stabilization cap is insufficient, especially for senior renters. He advocated for a 2% cap and permanent rent control on all properties. - Julian Contreras (21-year-old, recent graduate) criticized underfunded schools, high taxes on residents but tax breaks for corporations, and called for taxing the rich to invest in education and seniors. Discussion Items - Immigration Package: Chair Orieva outlined four bills passed: public safe spaces (libraries, community centers not cooperating with ICE), resident kidnapping protection act, prohibiting facial coverings, and accounting for ICE detainees via nonprofit partnerships. - Community Beautification Package: Included clean corridors rapid response (48-hour cleanup for dumped trash), clean community transparency dashboard, vacant property maintenance and tax (5x rate for vacant properties), legal signage enforcement (utility companies fined, businesses identified by sign info), see-it-snap-it-get-paid (up to 50% of violation to resident), and a moratorium on 24-hour tobacco stores inside the Beltway. - Universal Child Care Package: Work group, expansion of quality improvement act (evaluate new buildings for child care space), child care building blocks grant ($500,000), first-ever early start child care scholarship ($2 million), and quality of life fund (fees on liquor, tobacco, self-storage, convenience, gun shops used for senior/youth services, public safety, child care). - Economic Development Package: Set-aside for sit-down restaurants, concierge permitting (50% fee reduction inside Beltway). - Future Packages: Affordable housing, workforce development, access to information/transparency. - Senior Property Tax Relief: Chair Orieva announced three forthcoming bills: moratorium on increases for seniors, matching state tax break similar to Montgomery County, and deferred payment structure capping increases with payback upon sale. - Library Funding: Chair Orieva stated the council increased library budget and is working on raises. - Rent Stabilization: Chair Orieva expressed disappointment that the passed bill only applies to certain properties. She supports permanent rent stabilization for all properties and cited Montgomery County's rolling provision as a model. She advocated for continued advocacy and voter action to change council composition. - Data Centers and Landover Mall: Chair Orieva stated she is working on legislation to repeal a prior bill that allowed Landover Mall to skip council approval. She supports a full ban on data centers and said the majority of council holds the moratorium. - Parks and Planning Tax: Chair Orieva criticized MNCPPC for bloated budgets, surplus of hundreds of millions, and excessive spending on headquarters, while reducing rec center hours and senior programs. The council forced them to spend on free swimming, summer camp scholarships, senior services, and special needs programs. - School Transportation: Chair Orieva said the council has pushed the school system on bus driver shortages and alternate plans, but the council lacks line-item budget authority over schools. Key Outcomes - Chair Orieva agreed to facilitate a meeting with County Executive Aisha Braveboy for Indivisible regarding voter suppression. - The council committed to following up on senior property tax relief with three bills to be presented soon. - Implementation updates will be requested for the senior protection act (scams) and dumpster overflow/clean lots legislation. - Chair Orieva and Vice Chair Olson will work with incoming councilmember Victor Ramirez on Metzrod Plaza issues. - A meeting with the health department is scheduled to discuss farmers market permit fees. - The council will investigate the Flock camera issue and confirm no cameras are currently in use. - The council will assist Lillian Walker with her railing issue and connect her with rehab programs. - Chair Orieva stated the council is working on fixing library raises and will continue advocacy for rent stabilization and data center bans.

The Saint Paul City Council met on Wednesday, September 9, 2026, from 3:31 PM to 5:04 PM in the Council Chambers. Six members were present at roll call (Councilmember Johnson absent), with seven present for later votes. The meeting covered a consent agenda, separate discussion items, first readings of ordinances, public hearings, and legislative hearing consent items. Consent Calendar - Communications & Receive/File (Items 1–3): Budget amendments for Public Works sewer construction, a new Neighborhood STAR Year-Round project (United Church of God in Christ Inc.), and Financial Services grant management software funds were received and filed. - Consent Agenda (Items 4–32): Adopted as amended. Notable items included: - Railway track removal approval (RES 26-1356). - Multiple street reconstruction and alley improvement assessments (e.g., University Ave., Pleasant Ave., Pelham Blvd., Wheelock/Grotto). - Ordinance permits for Highland Bridge infrastructure (Ford site). - Police Department grant applications for recruitment, DWI enforcement, and Violence Against Women Act. - Claim settlement of $12,335.47 for Cathryn Teigen. - Liquor license ownership changes for Mexico 32 Cocina, Bird In Hand, La Cucaracha, and new license for Lulus Salsas. - Adverse action against Tobacco Shop license with a $1,000 matrix penalty. - City–Xcel Energy Memorandum of Understanding. - Partial waiver of Sustainable Building Ordinance for Baker Park restroom. - Appointments to Capital Improvement Budget Committee and Workforce Innovation Board. - Donation of surplus patrol car to Saint Paul Police Historical Society. - Acceptance of GovAI Coalition travel reimbursement. - Amendments to Conduit Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds for Emma Norton/Restoring Waters and Nellie Francis Court projects. - Labor agreement (2026–2028) with Saint Paul Manual & Maintenance Supervisors Association. - Memorandum of Agreement with Plumbers Local 34 for Minnesota Paid Leave contributions. - Items 33, 34, and 35 were pulled for separate discussion. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 44 – Curb Cut Appeal (649 Snelling Ave N, Domino’s Pizza): Neighbor Bonita Stepa expressed opposition, arguing that the appeal seeks to benefit delivery drivers only and that traffic management should follow code as seen at nearby Taco Bell. Julie Hellwick noted that the variance was denied for condition E, not D, and questioned the pre-filed resolution draft. Appellant Eric Stoddard (Domino’s) advocated for retaining the curb cut to create a safe traffic pattern separating delivery vehicles from customers, with signage and design modifications to prevent traffic from entering the neighborhood. Discussion Items - Item 33 – Welcoming Week 2026 (RES 26-1483): Council recognized the city’s participation in Welcoming Week, reaffirming the contributions of immigrants and refugees. Speakers from the Saint Paul Immigrant Refugee Program and Welcoming America highlighted the week’s theme “The Stories We Share: The Courage to Connect.” The resolution was adopted unanimously (7–0). - Item 34 – Restoring Honorary Street Co-Naming (RES 26-1502): Councilmember Bowie moved to restore the practice, discontinued in 2017, and modernize it with a standard operating procedure. After debate, a version (version two) that included an exception for the next resolution (honoring Elder El-Kati) and a commitment to develop criteria was adopted 6–1 (Councilmember Jost opposed). The resolution itself then passed 6–1. - Item 35 – Co-Naming for Elder Mahmoud El-Kati (RES 26-1543): Council honored Professor Emeritus of History Mahmoud El-Kati by co-naming Milton Street and Iglehart Avenue. Speakers highlighted his decades of teaching, mentorship, and community impact. The community committed to bearing signage costs. Adopted 6–1 (Councilmember Jost opposed). - Item 36 – Drone Grant Application (RES 26-1399): Laid over from September 2; withdrawn by Council President Noecker because the council does not support expansion of the drone program until concerns are addressed. - Items 37–41 – First Readings of Ordinances: - Salt Storage Regulation (Ord 26-39): Staff explained the MS4 permit requirement to regulate bulk salt storage (≥1 ton) to protect surface waters. Laid over for second reading/public hearing on September 16. - Xcel Energy Franchise Agreements (Ord 26-40, 26-41, 26-43, 26-44): Climate Action Coordinator Liz Boyer presented highlights of new gas and electric franchise fees. Key changes include: simplified rates, decreased residential electric fee (median user saves $11/year), increased residential gas fee (median user pays $11 more – an overall wash), and a 50% rebate for low-income households enrolled in LIHEAP (9,821 participants). Commercial/industrial rates increase. A new Memorandum of Understanding with Xcel outlines joint energy efficiency and emission reduction efforts. All four ordinances laid over for second reading/public hearing on September 16. - Item 44 – Appeal of BZA Decision (Curb Cut Variance): After a public hearing, the council discussed the appeal. Councilmember Coleman moved to grant the appeal, citing staff recommendation that the curb cut improves safety by separating delivery and customer traffic. The appeal was granted (7–0). Key Outcomes - Welcoming Week resolution adopted unanimously (7–0). - Restoration of honorary street co-naming (version two) adopted 6–1; El-Kati co-naming adopted 6–1. - Drone grant application withdrawn. - Salt storage and Xcel franchise ordinances laid over to September 16 for second reading and public hearing. - Sound variance for Light the Night (Blood Cancer United) adopted (7–0). - $160,000 donation from Como Friends to Como Zoo and Conservatory adopted (7–0). - Curb cut appeal granted (7–0), reversing the Board of Zoning Appeals denial. - Legislative hearing consent agenda (items 45–50) adopted as amended (7–0). - Next meeting: September 16, 2026.

Council Chair Crystal Orieta hosted the third fall listening tour in her home district, presenting accomplishments and soliciting public input on policy and community concerns. The meeting featured a recap of legislative packages passed in 2026 and a two-hour public comment period covering issues from maintenance to data centers. Public Comments & Testimony - Gail Powell and Leslie Dwight (Holloway Estates): Raised concerns about inconsistent grass cutting by the county, stating that a lack of staffing has led to overtime-only maintenance. Leslie Dwight argued that initiatives like Clean Corridors become unfunded mandates, and noted that some properties have not paid taxes since 1954, calling for accountability. - Richard Hensley: Complained about unmaintained roads (Woodyard Road, Allentown Road) and long response times from 311, with one request scheduled for April 2027. He also reported a drainage issue caused by a neighbor's unpermitted construction. - Joe Horkel (Upper Marlboro town council, Friends of the Library): Urged funding for the library system, noting that staff did not receive a 2% raise last year and face a second year without a raise, hurting retention. Also thanked for data center moratorium but urged noise ordinance attention. Raised concerns about county-owned vacant properties like the Elm Street school. - Floyd Simpson Jr. (Crownsville): Criticized community policing members for following and targeting residents without cause. - James McRae (Cavita Heights): Asked about the legality of a family operating a store in their front yard, causing traffic. - Stacey Hartwell: Questioned the council's policy on electric bills subsidizing infrastructure for large loads like data centers and the sphere. Chair Orieta agreed and discussed regional efforts and rate moratorium. - Dan Smith (Chevlin): Thanked for focus on ICE and democracy, urged public financing of elections. Questioned vacant property law applicability to Landover Mall. Criticized streamlining development at the expense of environmental standards. Suggested community housing retrofits. - Charlie Porter (District 7): Disappointed in lack of council presence on his street. Criticized 311 system and snow removal on Tucker Road. - Karina Addison (Largo): Asked about litigation over new fees on liquor stores and storage facilities, and whether the county consulted businesses. Chair Orieta defended the fees, arguing these businesses do not contribute positively and that she is pro-business for restaurants and small businesses. - Keen Aspive (Suitland): Complained about overgrown grass at Allentown Road and commercial vehicles parked in residential streets. Called for better customer service from 311. - Gerald Weston (North Hillmark Circle): Described an open-air drug market at Hillmar Drive and Walters Lane, with police present but not intervening. - James Yasinowski (River Bend): Represented National Harbor Noise Disturbances Group, opposed the proposed entertainment sphere due to lack of public involvement, traffic, visual pollution, and energy demands. Asked for public hearings. - Adam Wall (Library staff): Spoke about library funding cuts, loss of resources, and staff not receiving raises for two years. - Sayla Bell (No Landover Data Center Coalition): Criticized the two-year moratorium on data centers as insufficient, noting a loophole that allows early termination. Questioned the council's commitment to a permanent ban. Chair Orieta said she supports a full ban but lacked six votes; she is working on a permanent solution for Landover. - Kevin Huang: Asked about planning board members who advanced data center zoning (LDR 155) despite public opposition. Chair Orieta explained the planning board only makes recommendations, and she is a no vote on that bill. - Paul Howe (Palmar Manor): Asked about tax subsidies for the sphere. Chair Orieta explained her criteria: labor, MBE, workforce development, community benefits. - Wanda Carter (Suitland): Opposed the Silver Hill apartments project, citing traffic, lack of entry points, and impact on her street. Expressed frustration that Chair Orieta did not publicly oppose it. Chair Orieta explained she cannot speak on quasi-judicial matters until it comes before the council. - Unnamed speaker: Asked about affordable housing package. Chair Orieta described upcoming bills on small landlord incentives, surplus land for affordable housing, fast-tracking, and homeownership. - Resident from Kentland Columbia Park: Complained about vacant houses, trash, narrow streets, tree limbs, and streetlights out for months. Asked for help. - Candace Jones Young (Town Square at Suitland): Raised an issue with early entry kindergarten: her son passed the test but cannot use sibling privilege for a specialty school because early entry students must attend boundary school. Chair Orieta promised to raise with the superintendent. - Jade Campbell (Library employee): Spoke about lack of raises, building disrepair, and need for funding. - Brittany Adams: Reported a failing asphalt section on Pennsylvania Avenue SE and asked for help contacting Maryland DOT. - Reverend Richardson (District 25): Raised public safety enforcement on Hillmar Drive, Pepco right-of-way, and workforce development with Hope Project. Chair Orieta committed to follow up. - Malika Matthews: Asked about debris cleanup after accidents, burning debris regulations, and a single-family home that became a three-story apartment without proper permit. - Robert Pettis (Federation of Park Recreation Council): Opposed budget cuts and transfers from Park and Planning, arguing they harm parks and recreation. Chair Orieta defended the cuts as equitable, noting historic underinvestment in southern districts and that cuts were from building funds, not services. Discussion Items - Chair Orieta presented a detailed recap of legislative packages passed in 2026: - Immigration package: Restrictions on ICE collaboration, safe spaces, resident kidnapping protection, facial mask ban, and nonprofit data collection. - Community beautification: Clean corridors with rapid response, transparency dashboard, vacant property maintenance and tax increases (5x), illegal sign enforcement, "see it, snap it, get paid" program, and a moratorium on convenience stores in District 7. - Universal child care: Workgroup, expansion act, building block grant ($500K), and quality of life fund funded by an annual $5,000 fee on liquor stores, tobacco stores, self-storage, and gun shops. - Economic development: Fine dining fast track, EDI carve-out for sit-down restaurants, small business grants, and minority subcontractor to prime contractor program. - Data center moratorium: Two-year moratorium on all data center development. - Upcoming packages: Affordable housing, workforce development, and transparency/access to information. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; the meeting was a listening tour. - Chair Orieta and her staff (Amir, Trey) committed to follow up on numerous constituent service issues, including: - Grass cutting in Holloway Estates and other areas. - Long 311 response times and resetting service level agreements. - Library funding and raises. - Vacant property enforcement (Landover Mall, county-owned buildings). - Sphere development: public hearings to be scheduled; TIFF legislation expected. - Data center moratorium: Chair Orieta working on a permanent ban for Landover. - Police presence at Hillmar Drive and Walters Lane. - Early entry kindergarten policy: referral to school board. - Park and Planning budget: Chair defended cuts, promised continued oversight. - Residents were encouraged to take the quality of life survey. - The meeting concluded at approximately [time not given].

The Housing and Land Use Committee (HLU) of the Maui County Council reconvened from previous sessions (August 5, 19, and 27, 2026) to consider Resolution 26-129 and Resolution 26-130, which would refer to the Maui Planning Commission proposed bills to amend community plans and rezone apartment-district properties in the Sea Level Rise Exposure Area (SLREXA) to hotel districts, allowing continued Transient Vacation Rental (TVR) uses. The meeting ran from 10:32 a.m. to 5:02 p.m., with multiple recesses for deliberation. Oral testimony was closed, but written testimony continued to be accepted. Public Comments & Testimony - No oral testimony was taken; the oral testimony period had closed prior to this meeting. Discussion Items Resolution 26-129 – Criteria and Conditions The committee focused on establishing criteria to determine which properties among eight listed (including Island Sands, Maalaea Kai, Kihei Bay Surf, Kihei Bay Vista, Lokelani, Hale Ono Loa, Pikake, and Hale Kai I) would qualify for referral to the planning commission. - Councilmember Paulton proposed a criterion that properties in Kihei must be makai (ocean side) of South Kihei Road to be included, arguing the county is defending that road’s infrastructure. She also proposed three conditions for the committee report: (1) public beach access from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. where absent; (2) updated state certified shoreline assessment; and (3) requiring removal or bonding for structures within 40 feet of the certified shoreline, with removal when within 20 feet. - Councilmember Rollins Fernandez proposed a criterion based on historical residential use: properties where owner-occupied or long-term residential uses exceeded 25% of total units in calendar year 2008 (as a proxy for predominantly visitor accommodations) would be excluded from rezoning. She also proposed a condition requiring property owners to execute an agreement for removal of human-made objects if structures become threatened by sea level rise. - Councilmember Batangan and others debated the legal nexus for conditions, with Deputy Corporation Counsel explaining that conditions must have a rational nexus to the impact of the zoning change and be roughly proportional. - After extensive debate, a motion to adopt Paulton’s South Kihei Road criterion failed (4 ayes, 5 noes). A motion to adopt Rollins Fernandez’s original 25% criterion also failed (4 ayes, 5 noes). - A compromise amendment by Paulton to apply the 25% criterion except for properties in flood hazard areas was then passed (5 ayes, 4 noes). Under this, the three properties excluded from rezoning were Island Sands, Maalaea Kai, and Hale Kai I. - The committee then voted to amend Resolution 26-129 by incorporating the approved criteria (properties with 50% of structures in SLREXA, flood hazard area, or shoreline setback; properties not originally built for affordable/workforce housing; and the exclusion of the three properties identified under Paulton’s amended criterion). The amended resolution passed (5 ayes, 4 noes). - The proposed conditions (beach access, shoreline assessment, and removal agreements) were not voted on but will be transmitted to the Maui Planning Commission as ideas for their consideration, along with noting that there was no consensus on them. Resolution 26-130 – Two Additional Properties Councilmember Cook introduced Resolution 26-130 to rezone two properties: 10 Walaka Street (Kihei) and Makai Sunset Inn (Lahaina, which burned down in the Lahaina fire) to allow continued TVR use. - Councilmember Paulton moved to file the resolution, arguing that 10 Walaka Street had not paid correct property taxes until recently and that Makai Sunset Inn, destroyed by fire, should not create new shoreline hotel uses. That motion to file failed (4 ayes, 5 noes). - Councilmember Cook then moved to adopt the resolution. After discussion about the property tax history and lack of final payment verification, the committee voted to defer Resolution 26-130 to a future meeting, as key resource persons were no longer available and additional documentation was needed. Key Outcomes - Resolution 26-129 was recommended for adoption (5-4 vote) with the approved criteria: properties meeting the 50%+ footprint test in SLREXA, flood hazard area, or shoreline setback, and not originally intended for workforce housing, with the additional exclusion of Island Sands, Maalaea Kai, and Hale Kai I based on the 25% residential use criterion (excluding flood zone properties). - Proposed conditions from Paulton and Rollins Fernandez were not adopted but will be forwarded to the planning commission as discussion points, with a note that they lacked unanimous support. - Resolution 26-130 was deferred; no further action taken on September 9, 2026. - The meeting adjourned at 5:02 p.m.

The Columbus Plan Commission met on Wednesday, September 9, 2026, at 4:00 PM in the Meeting Hall at City Hall, 123 Washington Street, Columbus, Indiana. The meeting was streamed live and online. Commissioners present: Michael Kinder (presiding officer), David Bush, Sandy Sherman, Laura Garrett, Keerthi Alapati, and others. The commission considered three agenda items: a site development plan for the Downtown Entrance Plaza, a continuance request for a Wawa gas station, and a preliminary plat for the Timberland Springs subdivision. All actions were approved except a modification for overhead utility lines, which was denied. Consent Calendar - Minutes of the August 12, 2026 meeting were approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Timberland Springs Subdivision: Jesse Perez (733 Dawson Street) expressed support for the development but raised concerns about flooding on Dawson Street and the condition of Danois Creek. He requested a plan for drainage improvements. Colin Roof (4605 South 150 West) questioned the dimensions of the proposed berm and drainage impacts on his property. The applicant responded that drainage would be routed to the Straddlemyer arm with four ponds to control runoff and that homes would be elevated above floodplain elevations. - Downtown Entrance Plaza: Jamie Goldsborough (downtown resident and Landmark Columbus Foundation) and Brooke Hawkins (director of Columbus Area Arts Council) spoke in support of the project, citing its cost-effectiveness and benefit to downtown vibrancy. Jean Donica also expressed support as an adjoining neighbor. Discussion Items - SDP-26-32: Columbus Downtown Entrance Plaza – A proposal by the Columbus Redevelopment Commission for a redesign of Robert Garton Plaza. The site features a public safety plaza, seating, picnic area, and a freestanding sign. Two modifications were requested: (1) to allow a freestanding sign where not normally permitted (site under 2 acres, no primary structure), and (2) to allow the sign to be 64 sq. ft. (ordinance permits 50 sq. ft.). Staff found criteria met for both modifications. The commission approved both modifications and the overall site development plan unanimously (7-0). - SDP-26-34: Wawa – The applicant requested a continuance to the October 14, 2026 meeting due to fall break scheduling concerns. The commission granted the continuance by voice vote. - SUB-26-48: Timberland Springs Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat – Arbor Homes proposed 284 lots and 7 common areas on 107 acres at the northeast corner of Deaver Road and 150 West. Three modifications were requested: (1) waiver of sidewalk crossing at Bridal Way intersection, instead providing a sidewalk connection to Renwood Drive; (2) extension of temporary dead-end street length from 150 ft to 310 ft for phasing flexibility; (3) allowance to keep overhead utility lines along 150 West instead of burying them. Staff recommended approval of modifications 1 and 2, but denial of modification 3 (overhead lines). The commission approved modifications 1 and 2 (7-0) and denied modification 3 (6-1 vote, Keerthi Alapati opposed). The overall preliminary plat was approved with staff-required revisions and two commitments: (1) install a 5-foot sidewalk on the west side of 150 West between Renwood Drive and Bridal Way, and (2) install an RRFB (rapid flashing beacon) at the intersection of 150 West and Renwood Drive when that intersection improvements are completed. Vote: 7-0 in favor. Key Outcomes - SDP-26-32 (Downtown Entrance Plaza) – Approved with modifications for freestanding sign; all votes 7-0. - SDP-26-34 (Wawa) – Continued to October 14, 2026. - SUB-26-48 (Timberland Springs) – Modifications 1 and 2 approved; modification 3 denied. Overall preliminary plat approved with conditions and commitments. Vote: 7-0. - Next Meeting: The October 14 meeting date may conflict with fall break; a quorum may be affected. The commission will determine if the meeting proceeds or is rescheduled to November 12 (Veterans Day) or November 11.