EnvisionCR
⬚ figure
A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Updated April 14, 2026 PREPARED BY RDG PLANNING & DESIGN HR GREEN, INC.
CEDAR RAPIDS City of Five Seasons®
⬚ figure
A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Updated April 14, 2026 PREPARED BY RDG PLANNING & DESIGN HR GREEN, INC.
CEDAR RAPIDS City of Five Seasons®
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
City Manager City of Cedar Rapids
It is with gratitude that I thank and acknowledge the Cedar Rapids community for their interest, involvement, and active participation in the planning process of EnvisionCR. It can be challenging to wrap your mind around something as vast as a comprehensive plan, but Cedar Rapids residents have shown us they are willing and active participants in helping shape the long-term vision of our community.
During the months of pre-planning leading up to the launch of the new plan, we knew we wanted to involve the community in every stage of the process. The plan previously on the books was more than 15 years old, and we were eager for fresh insight and a realigned sense of community aspiration and identity.
Under the skilled and experienced leadership of our Community Development staff, the department set out to engage residents of all ages and backgrounds in a process that would ultimately span the course of 13 months. This product is the result of collaboration to the highest degree, from high-school students to senior executive leadership.
From face-to-face interaction and open houses, to nontraditional forms of digital outreach, the community embraced the planning process and responded with thoughtful, intentional feedback. Our team was amazed at not only the sheer number of participants, but their level of engagement and anticipation of the future plan.
Internally, our efforts have also included cross-departmental collaboration and unity in plan adoption and implementation. The goals set forth in the comprehensive plan will be adopted by all departments, collectively using EnvisionCR as a blueprint for prioritization, funding considerations, and long-term planning.
It is with great anticipation that we look forward to the next chapter and see the initiatives start to unfold. Our planning efforts would not have been possible without the collaboration and participation of the community we serve. Again, thank you for your engagement and expectations. We look forward to answering the call.
Sincerely, Jeff Pomeranz, City Manager City of Cedar Rapids
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Ron Corbett | Mayor Susie Weinacht | At-Large Ann Poe | At-Large Ralph Russell | At Large Kris Gulick | District 1 Monica Vernon | District 2 Pat Shey | District 3 Scott Olson | District 4 Justin Shields | District 5
PLANNING COMMISSION Dominique Blank Samantha Dahlby James Halverson Bill Hunse Kim King Carletta Knox-Seymour Scott Overland Richard Pankey Virginia Wilts
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Jeff Pomeranz Sandi Fowler Emily Muhlbach
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Jennifer Pratt Gary Kranse Adam Lindenlaub Seth Gunnerson Jeff Hintz Anne Russett Kirsty Sanchez Thomas Smith Brandon Whyte
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Jasmine Almoayed
PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM Angie Charipar Rob Davis Brad DeBrower Dave Elgin Mark English Ron Griffith Kasey Hutchinson Bruce Jacobs Wayne Jerman Sven Leff Brent Long Joe Mailander Ken Russell Greg Smith Vern Zakostelecky
EnvisionCR STEERING COMMITTEE Tom Aller Lydia Brown Samantha Dahlby Kris Gulick Michael Kates JoAnn McNiel Scott Overland Scott Olson Al Pierson Ann Poe Jim Sattler Monica Vernon Kyle Skogman Allen Witt
CONSULTANT TEAM RDG Planning & Design www.RDGUSA.com
HR Green, Inc. www.HRGREEN.com
7 | DISCOVER | A review of the plan's purpose and public engagement process.
19 | GUIDING PRINCIPLES | The principles of the plan emerged through the process, and established the desirable conditions for Cedar Rapids’ future.
33 | ELEMENTS | Goals and initiatives for achieving the public's vision for the future.
161 | IMPLEMENTATION | An ongoing process that uses and updates the plan.
⬚ figure
DISCOVER
⬚ figure
THE ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN
⬚ figure
In March 2014, the city formally kicked-off its new comprehensive plan – EnvisionCR, a plan to engage residents hands-on and inspire them to create a vision for Cedar Rapids’ future.
We want to thank the hundreds of residents who invested their time and insight to help roadmap a strong future. EnvisionCR is a true document of the people.
As comprehensive planners, we worried the post-flood planning required of Cedar Rapids residents would leave the community survey-weary and reluctant to move forward. We’ve never been so wrong.
You turned up by the hundreds at public open houses, and responded in droves online.
Nearly everywhere we turned, residents welcomed the chance to partner with city officials to build a dynamic future. You’ve shared your vision for neighborhoods, downtown retail, entrepreneurship and industry, active riverfront opportunities, and more.
The theme that underpins all of these exceptional visions is faith in what Cedar Rapids is, and what it can become. City leaders have heard your desire to build on these themes and create a community of exceptional choices – a hub of the Midwest, where people clamor to live, work, learn, and play.
We work across the country with city leaders who are creating fresh new plans, but rarely do we get to enjoy a community this involved - this empowered to shape its future. We were particularly wowed by a powerful think-tank of nearly 100 local high school students who offered intelligent ideas in creative and passionate ways, loving the opportunity to talk directly with city officials.
Thank you, Cedar Rapids – for your vision, your passion, and your faith in the future.
⬚ figure
RDG Planning & Design
⬚ figure
By way of introduction to this comprehensive plan, the consulting team’s letter to the community, published in the Cedar Rapids Gazette on August 25, 2014 bears repeating:
EnvisionCR serves as the City's comprehensive plan, providing long-range guidance for policy decisions, investment priorities, and coordinated planning efforts across departments. The annual review of EnvisionCR is an important opportunity to evaluate the City's progress in implementing the Plan and to ensure that its recommendations remain aligned with evolving community needs, City Council Priorities, and citywide goals.
This review is intentionally timed to support the development of departmental budgets and work plans for the upcoming year. Through the coordinated evaluation of Initiatives and Action Steps, City staff are able to better understand how their efforts connect to the vision and strategies outlined in EnvisionCR. This collaborative process strengthens interdepartmental relationships, improves communication, and contributes to more efficient and cohesive planning and project development.
For the 2025 update, the narratives for ProtectCR and GreenCR were revised to reflect recent planning efforts, emerging trends, and ongoing implementation work. In addition, all corresponding area, neighborhood, corridor, infrastructure, and quality-of-life plans were reviewed and updated as part of this cycle. These updates help ensure that EnvisionCR remains a relevant, accurate, and forward-looking guide for decision-making and community investment.
⬚ figure
| Status | Count |
|---|---|
| Complete | 39 |
| Ongoing | 17 |
| Started | 51 |
| On-Schedule | 158 |
| Total Initiatives | 265 |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Encourage mixed-use and infill development. | |||||
| 1. | Develop a strategy to encourage small-scale infill development on vacant City-owned properties. | Community Development | Complete | City developed a viewer of all City owned properties for the public to make inquiries about. Completed in 2025. | |
| Manage growth and development to balance costs and serviceability to neighborhoods. | |||||
| 1. | Develop a strategy to preserve conservation areas identified in the Future Land Use Map following annexation. | 2-3 years | Community Development , Utilities, Public Works, Parks & Recreation | Started | |
| 2. | Develop annexation guidelines that incorporates infrastructure and service issues and costs, geographic features, environmental and other land use constraints, and market needs. | Within 1 year | Community Development | Started | |
| 3. | Update annexation agreements with adjacent communities. | Within 1 year | Community Development | Started |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Have the best parks, recreation, and trails system in the region. | |||||
| 1. | Update Parks and Recreation Master Plan to include a needs analysis, gap analysis, evaluation of existing facilities and programs, asset management strategies, and implementation actions. | 2-3 years | Parks & Recreation | On-schedule | |
| 2. | Develop Site Master Plans, prior to making improvements, for each of the following signature parks: Bever Park and Jones Park. | 2-3 years | Parks & Recreation | Started | |
| 3. | Develop a land acquisition strategy for new parks and expansion of existing parks. | 4-5 Years | Parks & Recreation | On-schedule | |
| 4. | Identify ways to incorporate parks and open space into new subdivisions as part of the update to the subdivision code. | 2-3 years | Parks & Recreation | On-schedule |
| CONNECTCR | Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goal 1: Provide choices for all transportation users. | ||||
| 1. Update the city's Comprehensive Trails Plan to: 1. Review existing and planned network 2. Identify completed projects 3. Confirm planned projects 4. Evaluate existing off- and on-street facilities | Public Works | Complete | The City Completed it's new Trails and Bikeways Plan in 2025. | |
| Goal 2: Bulid a complete network of connected streets. | ||||
| 1. Complete the Cedar Rapids portion of Tower Terrace Road, and support completion of this multi-jurisdictional project. | Within 1 year | Public Works | Started | Seeking funding to complete C Ave NE to Summerset Ave NE. C Ave NE to the City of Marion is complete. Design & right of way acquisition are underway. |
| Goal 3: Establish a network of complete streets. | ||||
| 1. Link interested property owners to training and technical assistance programs on the use of tax credits | Community Development | Ongoing | City Staff provides contact information on request and has had tax credit experts present at Historic Preservation Commission meetings to give Commissioners more information. | |
| Goal 4: Improve the funtion and appearance of our key corridors. | ||||
| 1. Almplement Wayfinding Program | Public Works | Complete | Completed in 2024. | |
| Goal 5: Support the development of an effective, regional, multi-modal transportation system. | ||||
| 1. Adopt the Corridor MPO Long Range Transportation Plan. | MPO | Complete | Completed in 2025. | |
| 2. Complete the Cedar Rapids portion of Tower Terrace Road, and support completion of this multi-jurisdictional project. | Within 1 year | Public Works | Started | Seeking funding to complete C Ave NE to Summerset Ave NE. C Ave NE to the City of Marion is complete. Design & right of way acquisition are underway. |
| 3. Develop the city's Comprehensive Transportation Plan consistent with the goals of the Corridor MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. | 2-3 years | Public Works | On-schedule | No updates at this time. |
| 4. Start transition to hybrid buses. | 2-3 years | Transit | On-schedule | The City submitted & won a grant application to fund two hybrid buses in 2025. |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protect Cedar Rapids from flooding and other hazards | |||||
| 1. | Determine a funding strategy to complete the Flood Control System, as quickly as possible, including Federal funding, City debt capacity, and County support. | Beyond 5 years | Utilities | On-schedule | City has been working on the final design of the 8th Avenue Bridge Replacement over the Cedar River to meet main grant requirement The West Side FCS received its first federal funding grant announcement of $25 million from the USDOT. Other progress includes completing a levee through Cedar Lake and opening of a storm water pump station in Czech Village. |
| 2. | Amend the Future Land Use Map to reflect planned land use based on the adopted flood control alignment. | Within 1 year | Community Development, Public Works | Started | No updates at this time. |
| 3. | Review the potential for regional flooding and water quality improvements and work with partners in planning and implementation. | 2-3 years | Public Works, Utilities, Parks & Recreation | Started | The City actively participates in the Middle Iowa, Indian Creek, Middle Cedar, and Lower Cedar Watershed Management Authorities. In collaboration with these organizations, the City promotes the use of infiltration practices to reduce runoff and flooding in urban and agricultural areas. |
| Maintain and provide quality services to the community | |||||
| 1. | Replace or update outdated facilities ( Bender Pool, Parks Maintenance, Twin Pines Clubhouse, Ellis Clubhouse, and Gardner Clubhouse to create codern and sustainable facilities | 4-5 years | Parks & Recreation | On-Schedule | Close to being finished with an assesment which will provide guidance on the condition of all community pools including Bender. Ellis Clubhouse is done, and Gardner Clubhouse is expected to be finished spring 2026. |
| 2. | Acquisition of a new off-site facility that would provide space for evidence storage and personnel, and Crime Scene Unit. | Within 1 year | Police Department | Started | The search for a suitable location continues. There's currently no plans to move Joint Communications from it's current location. |
| 3. | Review options and most successful way to implement a new records management system. | 2-3 years | Police Department | Started | A project manager has been hired. Implementation is moving forward. Scheduled to be in place by 2028. Schedule changed to 2-3 years in 2025. |
| 4. | Review digital evidence procedures and research areas of opportunity to streamline and improve Public Information Requests and requests for the County Attorney. | Within 1 year | Police Department | Started | The City is in the process of selecting a records management system and a robust Digital Evidence Management System (DEMS). |
| 5. | Upgrade water meters to improve efficiency and be less invasive. | Within 1 year | Utilities | Started | In progress, expected to be completed in 2026. |
| 6. | Upgrade lead water lines per the EPA's lead service line replacement (LSLR) program. | Within 1 year | Utilities | Started | A revised service line inventory was done in October 2025. The City is developing a plan to replace lead service lines. |
| 7. | Identify commonalities in overdoses and repeat offenders and partner with other organizations to provide resources to individuals needing extra support. | Fire Department | Ongoing | The Fire Department receives most of their calls for service from a relatively small portion of the public. The Care Team was formed to identify resources in the community and coordinate with organizations to address things like care for the elderly, overdoses and repeat offenders. Moved to ongoing in 2025. | |
| 8. | Invest and secure a live fire training site. | 3-5 years | Fire Department | On-Schedule | City has potentially identified Land as well as initiated discussions with a private entity to explore private public partnership. Funding resources are being explored. |
| 9. | Develop plan for implementation of the Raftelis Study recommendations. | Fire Department | Complete | Completed in 2025. | |
| 10. | Implement security system to include badge entry and surveillance cameras at every station. | 2-3 years | Fire Department | On-Schedule | No updates at this time |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintain and provide quality services to the community | |||||
| 11. | Relocate fire stations 2 and 8. | Beyond 5 years | Fire Department | On-schedule | Prioritizing the training facility construction development. Changed to beyond 5 years in 2025. |
| 12. | Rebuild fire stations 5 and 6. | Beyond 5 years | Fire Department | On-schedule | Prioritizing the training facility construction development. |
| 13. | Expand and renovate fire stations 4 and 9. | 2-3 years | Fire Department | On-schedule | Prioritizing the training facility construction development. |
| 14. | Implement staffing recommendations of the Raftelis Study. | Within 1 year | Fire Department | On-Schedule | The City applied for FEMA's Staffing for Adequate Fire & Emergency Response (SAFER) grant funding. |
| 15. | Upgrade fitness equipment and physical fitness program for the fire department. | Fire Department | Complete | Completed in 2025. | |
| 16. | Upgrade Central Fire's audio/ visual equipment to host virtual trainings. | 2-3 years | Fire Department | On-Schedule | No updates at this time. |
| 17. | Replace the fire department's outdated portable communication systems. | Fire Department | Complete | Completed in 2025. | |
| 18. | Create a replacement plan for all fire department's radios to be encrypted. | Fire Department | Complete | Completed in 2025. | |
| 19. | Upgrade lead water lines per the EPA's lead service line replacement (LSLR) program. | Within 1 year | Utilities | Started | A revised service line inventory was done in October 2025. The City is developing a plan to replace lead service lines. |
| 20. | Identify commonalities in overdoses and repeat offenders and partner with other organizations to provide resources to individuals needing extra support. | Fire Department | Ongoing | The Fire Department receives most of their calls for service from a relatively small portion of the public. The Care Team was formed to identify resources in the community and coordinate with organizations to address things like care for the elderly, overdoses and repeat offenders. Moved to ongoing in 2025. | |
| 21. | Invest and secure a live fire training site. | 3-5 years | Fire Department | On-Schedule | City has potntially identified Land as well as initiated discussions with a private entity to explore private public partnernship. Funding resources are being explored. |
| 22. | Develop plan for implementation of the Raftelis Study recommendations. | Fire Department | Complete | Completed in 2025. | |
| 23. | Implement security system to include badge entry and surveillance cameras at every station. | 2-3 years | Fire Department | On-Schedule | No updates at this time |
| 24. | Study the feasibility of creating certification program for contractors who work on historic resources | Beyond 5 years | Community Development | On-Schedule | No updates at this time. |
| Goal 8: Incentives and benefits for preserving historic properties should attract investment in historic properties | |||||
| 1. | Link interested property owners to training and technical assistance programs on the use of tax credits | Community Development | Ongoing | City Staff provides contact information on request and has had tax credit experts present at Historic Preservation Commission meetings to give Commissioners more information. | |
| 2. | Incentives should be developed and maintained that include financial aid, regulatory flexibility and technical assistance to preserve historic properties | Community Development | Ongoing | The City offers economic development incentives for redevelopment of existing historic structures or the relocation/integration of a historic structure as part of a new development project. |
Within these following tables are plan action steps to be started Within 1 Year, are continuous, or have been completed. To see a a full update on plan action steps, go to the plan on the City's website: www.cedar-rapids.org
| HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN | Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goal 7: Clear and complete ordinances that guide the preservation program, protect historic properties, and promote preservation goals | ||||
| 1. Maintain the disaster-response program for endangered properties | Community Development | Complete | Completed in 2025. | |
| Goal 11: Community organizations are strong advocates for historic preservation | ||||
| 1. Identify outreach events with community organizations that may be interested in historic preservation | Community Development | Ongoing | The City is planning a Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) meeting at the History Center. Distributed Historic Rehab Program information with several community groups in Wellington Heights area. |
| WELLINGTON HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN | Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Capital and Public Safety | ||||
| 1. Improve lighting throughout the neighborhood | Public Works | Complete | Completed in 2024 | |
| Housing and Historic Character | ||||
| 1. Establish incentive for de-conversion | Short-Term | Community Development | On-Schedule | No updates at this time. |
| Open Space and Recreation | ||||
| 1. Explore opportunities for Wellington Green | Parks & Recreation | Complete | The City's lease is currently being terminated with Willis Dady and the City no longer considers this a park. | |
| Aesthetics and Neighborhood Design | ||||
| 1. Design and install identity signage at neighborhood gateway intersections | Short-Term | Public Works | On-Schedule | No updates at this time. |
| Sustainability | ||||
| 1. Explore and implement "green alleys" where feasible | Short-Term | Community Development | Started | No updates at this time. |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity Goal 1: Improve transportation and infrastructure to make 6th street a multi-modal corridor | |||||
| 1. | Study one-way pair of 15th and 16th Avenues and develop a preferred plan. | Public Works | Complete | Concept completed in 2024. | |
| Strength Goal 1: Promote aesthetic improvements and enhance its visual character | |||||
| 1. | Identify gaps in pedestrian street lighting and determine priority areas for safety improvements along the 6th Street SW corridor and planning area | Community Development, Public Works | Complete | Street lighting was designed to provide light for streets as well as the sidewalks. Completed in 2024 | |
| Strength Goal 2: Improve organizational capacity | |||||
| 1. | Improve Reed Park programming to engage the neighborhood | Parks & Recreation, Taylor Area NA | Ongoing | Changed to ongoing in 2025. |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity Goal 1: Improve walkability, accessibility, and connectivity in the area | |||||
| 1. | Ensure future road network for undeveloped sites prioritizes walkability through small block sizes, improved connections between developments, and increased intersections in alignment with the 15-minute neighborhood concept. | Within 1 year | Community Development | On-Schedule | The creation of Sandberg Lane adjacent to the new Westside Library project is an example of this. |
| 2. | Review mobile home ordinance to improve connectivity requirements. | Within 1 year | Community Development | On-Schedule | No updates at this time. |
| Connectivity Goal 2: Improve active transportation options | |||||
| 1. | Prioritize trails in the area through the Trails and Bikeway Plan update to increase access to recreational amenities. | Public Works | Complete | This was completed with the adoption of the Trails and Bikeways Plan in 2025. | |
| Land Use & Placemaking Goal 1: Increase public, recreational, greenspace in the area | |||||
| 1. | Partner with other City departments and local property owners to include strategic parkspace considerations as land is acquired for other City projects and new development to align with the 15-minute neighborhood concept. | Within 1 year | Community Development | On-Schedule | No updates at this time. |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circulation | |||||
| 1. | Establish a minimum standard street profile and right of way that accommodates 4 travel lanes, turn lanes, center median, sidewalks and snow storage. | Public Works | Complete | The street profile has been established with four lanes, two going west , a turn lane and one lane going east. Completed in 2024. | |
| Character | |||||
| 1. | Include Lincoln Highway identity as part of aesthetic improvements included in a streetscape master plan. | Community Development | Complete | Completed in 2024. |
| Czech Village | Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Character and Placemaking Goal 1: Provide Czech Village and the adjacent neighborhoods a major community open space that could accommodate public activities while also serving as a catalyst for redevelopment. | ||||
| 1. | Determine the programmed amenities to be included in the future greenway park, including the Round House. | Within 1 year | Parks and Recreation | On-Schedule |
| Character and Placemaking Goal 2: Ensure the preservation and enhancement of Czech Village’s historic character through future development. | ||||
| 1. | Complete fundraising to reconstruct the former Round House structure within the greenway park. | Friends of the Czech Village | Complete | |
| Connectivity Goal 1: Simplify the mobility network, creating safer conditions for vehicles, cyclist, and pedestrians moving into, out of, and through Czech Village. | ||||
| 1. | Design for construction of the pedestrian promenade and parking lot expansion between 16th Avenue SW and the greenway park. | 2-3 years | Public Works | Complete |
| Sinclair Area | Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Character and Placemaking Goal 1: Create a signature built feature and open space amenity area to serve as the focus for redevelopment and public space improvements within the district. | ||||
| Design and construct Alliant Energy LightLine and trail extensions. | Within 1 year | Public Works | On-Schedule | Alliant Energy LightLine under construction, to be completed in 2026. |
| Connectivity Goal 1: Extend the street and trail networks through the Sinclair District, linking future development sites with the city’s existing mobility framework. | ||||
| Design concept layout for new north/south street adjacent to the Sinclair detention basin between 2nd and 4th Streets SE. | Public Works - Engineering Divison | Complete | Completed in 2025. | |
| Design concept layout for the extension of 4th and 3rd Streets SE east to connect with 9th Street SE. | Public Works | Complete | Completed in 2025. | |
| Infill Development Goal 1: Provide a development framework that will encourage the development of a mixed-use district, scaled appropriately to the surrounding neighborhoods and centered around a public plaza. | ||||
| Design central plaza space at the intersection of 3rd Street SE and new north/south street. | Within 1 year | Community Development | On-Schedule | No updates at this time. |
| New Bohemia | Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Character and Placemaking Goal 1: Unify the district through the creation and implementation of a common public realm design aesthetic. | ||||
| Design a gateway feature on 3rd Street SE east of 8th Avenue SE to celebrate entrance into the district. | Within 1 year | Community Development | On-Schedule | No updates at this time. |
| Connectivity Goal 1: Provide public connections, both physical and visual, from the NewBo district to the riverfront, that respond to the future flood control system improvements in a contextual manner. | ||||
| Perform a detailed market analysis for the district (including the NewBo Expansion). | Within 1 year | The District (Main Street) | On-Schedule | No updates at this time. |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon-Free Goal 1.A. Reduce carbon emissions 45% by 2030 and net-zero by 2050 | |||||
| 1. | Build a sustainable neighborhood program to advance sustainability achievements in each neighborhood and provide an exciting community-building opportunity for Neighborhood Associations | City Manager's Office (Sustainability) + Community Development | Ongoing | The Green Homes Program provides a way for Cedar Rapids residents to engage in the CCAP by sharing their sustainable actions, committing to do more, and receiving ongoing educational materials. This program is monitored on an annual basis to ensure it's meeting it's intended goals. | |
| 2. | Create a fund to implement a Green & Healthy Homes and Small Businesses program to support deep energy and water efficiency retrofits, hazard remediation, renewable energy, and vehicle and large appliance electrification, prioritizing vulnerable neighborhoods. | Community Development, City Manager's Office, Building Services | Ongoing | The Neighborhood Finance Corporation Energy Efficiency Program is active. This program is monitored on an annual basis to ensure it's meeting it's intended goals. | |
| 3. | Build a Sustainable Business program that enhances sustainable building practices (energy efficiency, clean energy, electrification, water, waste reduction) and sustainable land use practices (trees, green infrastructure, gardens, biking facilities). | City Manager's Office, Community Development | Ongoing | Standard City tax incentives include up to 10 year 100% tax exemption or reimbursement based on demonstrated increased cost. This program is monitored on an annual basis to ensure it's meeting it's intended goals. | |
| 4. | Update land development regulations to expand missing middle housing and neighborhood scale commercial opportunities through the City. | Community Development, Development Services | Ongoing | No updates at this time. | |
| 5. | Enhance the Complete Streets Policy to further community education and prioritize urban heat island mitigation and tree plantings in vulnerable neighborhoods. | Public Works, Community Development, Parks & Recreation | Ongoing | Heat mitigation is being integrated into City operations. Examples include bus shelter locations and shade structures. |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon-Free Goal 1B. INCREASE RENEWABLES TO 70-100% ELECTRICITY | |||||
| 1. | Support large-scale solar installations in underutilized areas (parking lots and rooftops) and urban reserve areas that offer multiple benefits. | Development Services, Community Development, Utilities | Ongoing | City of Cedar Rapids became an anchor tenant in Alliant Energy's Community Solar Garden, which allocates 900, 250-watt solar blocks over 20 years. In turn, the City receives a credit on its energy bill exceeding the amount of the investment. • A team of City staff are evaluating solar potential on city buildings and land. • The City has solar installations on NW Transit, three (3) water booster stations, and Ellis Clubhouse. • Local electric grid will have 50% reduced emissions by 2030. • The City is gold-rated SolSmart community for solar-friendly policies, programs, and utilities. | |
| Carbon-Free Goal 1.C Increase transtport sector's share of low-emission energy to 35-65% | |||||
| 1. | Develop readiness in the community for electric vehicle infrastructure and emerging low-emitting technologies. | City Manager's Office, Community Development, Finance, Public Works | Ongoing | The City committed to pursuing a smart charging designation through the DOE. | |
| Carbon-Free Goal 1D. Eliminate coal, reduce carbon in industry 65-90% and sequester remaining carbon | |||||
| 1. | Collaborate with industry around emission reductions (carbon capture, renewable energy) and community sustainability efforts (stormwater BMPs, garden and tree plantings, philanthropy, volunteerism). | City Manager's Office, Utilities, Public Works, Community Development | Ongoing | The City has a stormwater costshare program for commercial organizations. Ongoing volunteer opportunities are held every year. | |
| Resilient and Accessible Goal 2.A. Build resilience to flooding and climate hazards with priority for vulnerable residents | |||||
| 1. | Support and expand existing resilience programs to mitigate flooding and prepare residents for future climate extremes. | Within 1 year | City Manager's Office, Development Services, Community Development | Started | The City actively works with the Indian Creek Watershed Management Authority (ICWMA), the Middle Cedar Watershed Management Authority (MCWMA), and the Lower Cedar Watershed Management Authority to reduce runoff and mitigate flooding impacts. |
| 2. | Support the stormwater master plan with particular focus on regional detention basins and major funding gaps for hard infrastructure maintenance. | Within 1 year | Public Works, City Manager's Office, Development Services, Community Development | Started | Stormwater Master Plan was updated in 2024. The City is currently identifying funding sources for implementation. |
| 3. | Protect water quality by supporting source water protection initiatives and existing watershed partnerships that reduce nutrient-rich runoff into the Cedar River. | Utilities, Public Works | Complete | The City recently completed a Phase 2 Source Water Protection Plan (SWPP), which outlines the City's approach to safeguarding our water. The city is also working with 11 partners including regional farmers for the Cedar River Source Water Partnership (CRSWP). The goal of (CRSWP) is to work with farmers to protect Cedar Rapids' drinking water and support water quality improvements along the Cedar River. Complete 2023. |
| COMMUNITY CLIMATE ACTION PLAN | Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon-Free Goal 2B: Ensure all residents have accessible options for growing and consuming healthy, culturally relevant food | ||||
| 1. | Develop a food access policy as part of a sustainable development approach to ensure vulnerable residents can achieve healthy and relevant food (land access, growing, consuming, selling) within a 15-minute walk (including urban farms, gardens on commercial properties, public gardens, pantries, groceries, education). | Parks & Recreation, City Manager's Office, Community Development | Ongoing | |
| Resilient and Accessible Goal 2.C. Ensure equitable access to parks and natural space | ||||
| 1. | Implement the city's ReLeaf program, supporting vulnerable neighborhoods with air and heat pollution challenges. | Parks & Recreation | Ongoing | |
| Resilient and Accessible Goal 2.D. Increase equitable access to clean air and water | ||||
| 1. | Protect water quality by supporting source water protection initiatives and existing watershed partnerships that reduce nutrient-rich runoff into the Cedar River. | Utilities, Public Works | Ongoing | |
| 2. | Support stormwater BMP cost-share and ERU reduction programs on large properties. | Public Works, Development Services, Utilities | Ongoing | |
| Resilient and Accessible Goal 2.F : Provide direct connection to city government for vulnerable residents | ||||
| 1. | Protect water quality by supporting source water protection initiatives and existing watershed partnerships that reduce nutrient-rich runoff into the Cedar River. | Utilites, Public Works | Complete | |
| 2. | Support stormwater BMP cost-share and ERU reduction programs on large properties. | Within 1 year | Public Works, Development Services, Utilities | On-Schedule |
| Resilient and Accessible Goal 2.E. Create high-wage, green jobs and green economic development | ||||
| 1. | Expand sustainability support and expectations in purchasing, contracts, and development to support circular economy, local buying, and cooperative buying. | City Manager's Office, Finance, Public Works, Utilities | Complete | |
| Resilient and Accessible Goal 2.F. Provide direct connection to city government for vulnerable residents | ||||
| 2. | Operationalize the equitable engagement toolkit to reach more under-resourced and under-represented residents. | Within 1 year | T Community Development, City Manager's Office, Public Works | On-Schedule |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Housing Goal 2: Expand incentives that foster affordable, accessible and supportive housing | ||||
| 1. | Advocate and work with state to encourage housing tax credit program to support developments in close proximity to broader range of public amenities, not just transit (i.e. transit, and other amenities that support 15-minute neighborhoods). | City Manager's Office | Complete | |
| Housing Goal 4: Employ innovative approaches to support broader participation by Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants to increase enrollment in the Family Self Sufficiency (FSS) Program | ||||
| 1. | Update FSS program flyer, with approval of Program Coordinating Committee | Community Development - Housing | Complete | |
| 2. | Explore branding the FSS program to spark increased participant interest and understanding. | Community Development - Housing | Complete | |
| 3. | Increase promotion of FSS program to Section 8 Program participants through a variety of networks including targeted in-person outreach and informational fair and partnerships with community organizations. | Community Development - Housing | Ongoing | |
| Outdoor Spaces and Buildings Goal 1: Advance cultural, social, and economic value through public art | ||||
| 1. | Develop and implement an art show event geared towards older community members | Library | Complete |
Age Friendly Action Plan Goals & Initiatives - 2025 Update, Adopted September 2022 -DRAFT
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outdoor Spaces and Buildings Goal 2: Nurture the existence of "Third Places" and other important community spaces to foster social capital and to advance sustainability efforts to becoming 15-minute city | |||
| 1. | Explore feasibility of partnerships (i.e. with Economic Alliance, Downton District, library and/or other appropriate entities to promote winter skywalk activity. | Within 1 year | Community Development |
| Social Participation Goal 2: Foster neighborhood connections | |||
| 1. | Explore feasibility of neighborhood block parties to support neighborhood connections. | Community Development | |
| Social Participation Goal 3: Promote availability of accessible, affordable, and fun social activities | |||
| 1. | Identify residents who have voiced experiencing a lack of connection, including, but not limited to: Veterans, people with disabilities, BIPOC, LGBTQ+, and nursing home and assisted living residents, and develop outreach and engagement plans which reflects their unique culture, strengths and needs. | Within 1 year | City Manager's Office |
| 2. | Support social connection and digital literacy through senior oriented technology classes. | Library | |
| 3. | Increase circulating technology options. | Library | |
| Transportation Goal 1: Support sustainable mobility access | |||
| 1. | Explore opportunity to bring electrification to City parks to support charging for electric wheelchairs/scooters. | Within 1 year | City Managers Office |
| 2. | Ensure coordination with Climate Action Plan for mobility hubs equipped with charging for electric mobility devices (wheelchairs/scooters). | Within 1 year | City Managers Office |
| Transportation Goal 2: Promote active transportation | |||
| 1. | Identify opportunities to enhance and update transit maps, stop times, and visuals on City website. | Within 1 Year | Transit |
| 2. | Incorporate real-time bus route information into rotation on screens at City facilities. | Within 1 Year | Information Technology |
Age Friendly Action Plan Goals & Initiatives - 2025 UPdate, Adopted September 2022 -DRAFT
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communication & Information Goal 1: Maximize potential of MyCR mobile app as community resource | ||||
| 1. | Explore how to integrate Play! calendar into Mobile CR digital app. | Within 1 Year | City Manager's Office | Started |
| Civic Participation & Employment Goal 2: Bolster Equitable Engagement Toolkit development | ||||
| 1. | Explore new partnership opportunities to broaden outreach (i.e. Meals on Wheels, Assisted Living, Green Square Meals, etc.). | Community Development | Ongoing | |
| Civic Participation & Employment Goal 3: Attract a diverse and inclusive community for all |
Public Art Plan Goals & Initiatives - 2025 Update, Adopted April 2022 -DRAFT
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goal 1 - Continue To Enhance And Broaden Public Art Throughout The City: 1.1 Transform spaces throughout the City | ||||
| 1. | Create specific temporary art guidelines. | Public Art Commission | Complete | |
| Goal 1 - Continue To Enhance And Broaden Public Art Throughout The City: 1.2 Expand communication efforts around the value of public art to residents. | ||||
| 1. | Create a communications strategy to promote current and future public art installations through social media, programs, and events. | 1-2 Years | Communications | On-Schedule |
| 2. | Consider the creation of a mobile public art program to engage youth and families in underrepresented communities. This program may be in partnership with Parks and Recreation and/or the Public Library. | 3-5 years | To Be Decided | Started |
| Goal 1 - Continue To Enhance And Broaden Public Art Throughout The City: 1.3 Working with the neighborhood associations, develop a local artist-initiated public art program. | ||||
| 1. | Create a matching City fund for the program. | 1-2 years | City Leadership | On-Schedule |
Public Art Plan Goals & Initiatives - 2025 Update, Adopted April 2022 -DRAFT
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goal 3 | - Cultivate Partnerships To Support The Public Art Program And Advance City Priorities: 3.2 Continue to convene City departments to identify opportunities for partnerships. | ||||
| 1. | Work closely with the flood management team to implement public art as part of the system (as identified in the flood control plan). | 1-2 years | Public Art Staff | Started | Currently underway, installing a pump station mural with Public Works in spring 2026 in the Five Season Plaza Park. |
| Goal 4 | - Create A Sustainable Administrative And Funding Structure: 4.1 Reimagine the Commission/Committee structure. | ||||
| 1. | Review and update artist selection processes, establishing protocols and processes aligned with national best practices. | Public Art Staff, Public Art Commission | Complete | Completed in 2025. | |
| Goal 5 | - Implement A Maintenance Plan For The Current And Future Collection: 5.1 Invest in the Sustainability of the Collection | ||||
| 1. | Follow maintenance plan guidelines as defined in the Collection Survey. | 1-2 years | Public Art Staff | Started | Plans are underway for maintenance on the Tree of 5 Seasons. Summer of 2025 Crystal Impression received maintenance, and volunteers are restoring the Statue of Liberty replica. |
| Schedule | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land Use 1: Support opportunities for commercial and mixed-use development. | ||||
| 1. | Complete a Future Land Use Map amendment to reguide parcels in the study area identified as U-MI to U-HI. | Within 1 year | Community Development | Started |
| Connectivity 1: Improve pedestrian and vehicular traffic flow to and through the study area. | ||||
| 1. | Complete a parking study for the sport facility properties and adjacent streets. | 1-2 years | Community Development Support Group(s): Public Works | Started |
| 2. | Follow maintenance plan guidelines as defined in the Collection Survey. | 1-2 years | Public Art Staff | Started |
| 3. | Subscribe to a reputable collection management platform for the public art collection. | Public Art Staff | Complete | |
| 4. | Complete engineering study to determine if pedestrian crossing improvements are needed at the 8th Ave SW crossing at Rockford Rd. | Within 1 year | Lead Group: Public Works - Traffic | Started |
| Connectivity 2: Support opportunities for alternative modes of transportation. | ||||
| 1. | Improve location and accessibility of existing bike parking and install bike parking, where it does not exist, near entrances of the sport facilities. | Within 1 year | Lead Group: Community Development Support Group(s): Parks and Recreation, Sport Facilities | On-Schedule |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activate May's Island | ||||
| 1. | Programming of Mays Island, parking facility and Plaza Park, including design concepts, project scoping, and budget strategies. | Within 1 year | Public Works | Started |
| 2. | Conduct an assessment to determine the economic and structural viability of the underground ramp and the ability of Plaza Park to be redesigned and activated. | Facilities | Complete | |
| Continue to enhance public spaces adjacent to the Cedar River and support implementation of the Cedar River Flood Control System (FCS). | ||||
| 1. | Support phased, long-term implementation of (FCS) Master Plan public realm amenities and flood protection measures proposed for Downtown – the White-Water Course, 4th Avenue Plaza & Promenade, and Festival Grounds. | Public Works | Ongoing |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ensure Downtown is clean, safe, and welcoming. | |||||
| 1. | Move forward with the joint City/Linn County community approach to effectively ending homelessness with establishment of a Local Oversight Board and staff person to monitor performance on a community-wide basis, ensuring efficient and effective use of resources and continued collaboration with social service providers, the Police Department and other City departments, Linn County, and neighboring communities. | Within 1 year | Community Development | Started | Local Oversight Board will provide recommendations on funding and increased efficiencies across the community will start meeting in January of 2025. |
| 2. | Improve communication and education around available resources and services for the unhoused population to business and property owners, residents, employees, and other Downtown stakeholders. | Within 1 year | Community Development | Started | The Landlord and Tenant Success Pilot, funded by Cedar Rapids Bank and Trust will continue into 2025. A section of the OurCR magazine will be reserved for an update on the efforts to reduce homelessness in Cedar Rapids in the 2025 winter addition. |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ensure Downtown is clean, safe, and welcoming. | ||||
| 1. | Improve communication and education around available resources and services for the unhoused population to business and property owners, residents, employees, and other Downtown stakeholders. | Within 1 year | Community Development | Started |
| Attract and retain primary jobs in Downtown. | ||||
| 1. | Recruit new office uses by reconfiguring space from large to small, creating smaller leasable spaces that new ventures can afford. | 2-3 years | Economic Development | Started |
| Add public art and other physical place enhancements. | ||||
| 1. | Programming of 3rd Street, including design concepts, project scoping, and budget strategies to develop a preferred option for streetscape enhancements, such as: • A separated cycle track with two-way auto travel and parking on both sides of the street. • A curbless festival street concept that could accommodate two-way auto travel shared with bicycles and parking on both sides of the street that could easily be closed to automobiles during special events. | Within 1 year | Public Works | On-Schedule |
| 2. | Pilot closing 3rd Street to automobiles from 1st to 4th Avenues for special events. During the closures, assess the traffic and parking impacts to the other streets to make sure there are no significant negative impacts to Downtown circulation and parking. | 2-3 years | Public Works | On-Schedule |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provide regular programming in Downtown public spaces. | ||||
| 1. | Programming of permanent amenities that are oriented toward kids, like play equipment and splash pads, that encourage families to enjoy Downtown public spaces with evaluation of existing amenities, project scoping, and budget strategies. | Within 1 year | Parks & Recreation | Started |
| Explore opportunities for infill development, redevelopment, and adaptive reuse of existing spaces. | ||||
| 2. | Encourage office-to-housing building conversions where feasible by streamlining permitting and approval processes, considering financial incentives like property tax abatements or development fee reductions, exploring opportunities for public-private partnerships, and relaxing building code requirements. | Community Development | Complete | |
| 3. | Support opportunities for adaptive reuse and infill of housing, light manufacturing, and maker businesses within the Manufacturing/Maker Hub area, including experiential and craft manufacturing, artist studios, and small-scale food processing, | Community Development | Complete | |
| 4. | Attract an additional hotel(s) in the core of Downtown to address the shortage of hotel rooms and expand capacity for larger-scale conventions. | Within 1 year | Public Works | Started |
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Improve physical and economic connections to and synergy with adjacent districts. | ||||
| 1. | Enhance the streetscape along key corridors connecting Downtown to adjacent districts. | Within 1 year | Public Works | On-Schedule |
GOAL A: EXPAND THE EXTENT AND USE OF THE TRAIL AND BIKEWAY NETWORK
| Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategy 1: Focus on facility types that provide greater separation, comfort, and safety | ||||
| 2. | Adopt FHWA's Bikeway Selection Guide as the reference used to guide the outcome of bikeway facility decisions | Within 1 year | Public Works, County: Linn County Conservation | Started |
| Strategy 2: Develop the regional and local trail and bikeway network | ||||
| 1. | Designate and define regional and local bicycle facilities for funding, maintenance, and design purposes | Within 1 year | MPO | Started |
| 4. | Update EnvisionCR to incorporate review and evaluation of trail and bikeway connections in the planning guidelines | Within 1 year | Community Development | Started |
| 5. | Explore amendments to Chapter 32 of the Cedar Rapids Municipal Code to require trail construction at the time of development | Within 1 year | Community Development | Started |
| Strategy 3: Make it easier to safely cross busy streets | ||||
| 2. | Amend the Project Development and Management Manual to identify intersection safety countermeasures along projects that include trails or bikeways | Within 1 year | Public Works | On-Schedule |
| Strategy 4: Improve Amenities | ||||
| 1. | Analyze existing trailhead parking lots and identify gaps to maintain trailhead parking lots at minimum 5-mile intervals along the regional network | MPO | Complete | |
| 2. | Analyze existing water and toilet facilities and identify gaps to maintain water and toilet facilities at minimum 5-mile intervals along the regional network | MPO | Complete | |
| Resilient and Accessible Goal 2.E. Create high-wage, green jobs and green economic development | ||||
| 2. | Expand sustainability support and expectations in purchasing, contracts, and development to support circular economy, local buying, and cooperative buying. | City Manager's Office, Finance, Public Works, Utilities | Complete |
Trails and Bikeways Plan - 2025 Update, Adopted May 2025 -DRAFT
| GOAL A: EXPAND THE EXTENT AND USE OF THE TRAIL AND BIKEWAY NETWORK | Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategy 4: Improve Amenities | ||||
| 3. | Analyze existing arts and related attractions and identify gaps to maintain arts and related attractions at minimum 5-mile intervals along the regional trail system | MPO | Complete | |
| Strategy 5: Improve the public's attitude toward trail and bikeway users | ||||
| 2. | Enhance trail and bikeway communications to educate the public about the vision and purpose of the trail and bikeway system | Within 1 year | Community Development | Started |
| 3. | Identify one entity to host trail and bikeway count data | MPO | Complete | |
| Strategy 7: Improve winter maintenance of trail and bikeway facilities | ||||
| 4. | Analyze existing arts and related attractions and identify gaps to maintain arts and related attractions at minimum 5-mile intervals along the regional trail system | MPO | Complete | |
| Strategy 5: Improve the public's attitude toward trail and bikeway users | ||||
| GOAL B: MAINTAIN THE EXISTING TRAIL AND BIKEWAY NETWORK | Schedule | Lead | Status | Comments |
| Strategy 8: Identify resources for trails and bikeways use, expansion, and maintenance | ||||
| 2. | Identify, coordinate, and pursue supplemental funding options | Within 1 year | Public Works | On-Schedule |
| 4. | Define the purpose, goals, responsibilities, and duties of the BikeCR Committee. | Community Development | Complete | |
| 5. | Partner with advocacy groups, agencies, schools, and neighboring communities to promote, educate, and provide opportunities to those who depend on cycling or are under-represented | Community Development, County: Linn County Conservation | Ongoing |
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
THEMES THAT UNDERPIN THE ENTIRE PLAN
⬚ figure
| SUSTAINABILITY | HEALTH | PLACEMAKING | EFFICIENCY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainability is the ability to meet the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Pursuing sustainability in the City means addressing and improving environmental, social, and economic health concurrently—the triple bottom line of sustainability. | Healthy places support residents’ mental and physical health and in so doing, quickly attain a distinction as a place for families and young professionals to call home. For example, trails and parks spaces support the health of the body, while education and cultural facilities support intellectual development. | People will often identify with one particular place within their city. Sometimes this location is a school, a park, or even one’s home. Placemaking is about building memories through public spaces and activities, often associated with a destination like the riverfront, downtown or a given neighborhood. | Efficiency is about doing things in an optimal way, for example completing an infrastructure project in the fastest or in the least expensive way. Effectiveness is about doing the right task, completing activities and achieving goals. The plan is about being both efficient and effective. |
You will find here a visionary plan for action, rooted in the strong commitment of the residents of Cedar Rapids to continue what they have so well-started: to build an ever-better Cedar Rapids.
The plan’s structure is simple. Here, in the DISCOVER section, you will get an introduction to the background materials and process that drove the plan. You will also see the four themes that drive the plan forward: sustainability, health, placemaking, and efficiency. These themes are ever-present throughout the plan.
The GUIDING PRINCIPLES section demonstrates the foundation for the plan, built from the grassroots up. These principles should drive decision-making within Cedar Rapids and throughout the region for many years to come. The public engagement process led directly to these principles and their resulting land use maps. This is a critical section for decision-makers and for the public to understand the broad-sweeping overall direction of the plan.
Then you will see six detailed sections or plan ELEMENTS – these make up the essence of the plan. Each element consists of a background discussion before introducing you to the element’s goals. Each goal is supported by a series of initiatives that will help the city achieve that goal over time and reach the vision embodied through that element.
Finally, this plan reiterates the INITIATIVES in summary form, complete with timelines, roles and responsibilities – the information essential to creating a plan for action.
But this plan begins at the beginning – with a basic understanding of the purpose of a comprehensive plan.
The elements of this plan, with their associated goals, are as follows:
StrengthenCR. Make bold moves in community planning to retain the character of neighborhoods and corridors.
GrowCR. Engage in future planning to encourage sustainable connections of growth areas to existing neighborhoods.
ConnectCR. Create a culture that enhances transportation options for pedestrians and cyclists through complete streets, trails, and public transportation.
GreenCR. Buffer and connect existing parks, trails, and streams to build a natural network in addition to regional collaborations and individual efforts to improve stormwater management, water quality, wildlife habitat, and outdoor recreation.
InvestCR. Make Cedar Rapids a desirable place for businesses to start, move, and grow by leveraging resources to invest in business districts and amenities that keep and attract a skilled workforce.
ProtectCR. Provide quality services to increase neighborhood safety and keep moving forward with the flood control system.
⬚ figure
THE ELEMENT NAMES HAVE BEEN ADOPTED AS THE CITY COUNCIL’S GOALS. THE DESCRIPTIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL GOALS HAVE BEEN USED TO DESCRIBE THE ENVISIONCR ELEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THIS PAGE.
WHAT IS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN?
The EnvisionCR comprehensive plan provides a vision for the future of Cedar Rapids, with a focus on priorities for city policies and public investments in the next 20 years.
The plan serves three primary roles:
1. Community Building. Comprehensive planning provides an opportunity for residents to create a shared vision for their community. Residents and city staff identified issues and opportunities for Cedar Rapids' land use, infrastructure, public facilities, and natural resources, among other areas. These findings were used to set public priorities and provide a set of action steps that can improve quality of life and make the city more attractive for potential growth.
2. Legal Basis for Land Use Regulations. Section 414 of the Code of Iowa allows cities to adopt land use regulations such as zoning and subdivision ordinances, and to promote the "health, safety, morals or general welfare of the community." These regulations govern how land is developed within a municipality and its extra-territorial jurisdiction. Land use regulations recognize that people live cooperatively and have certain responsibilities to coordinate and harmonize the uses of private property. The comprehensive plan provides a legal basis for these regulations.
3. Guidance for Decision-Makers. The plan will serve as a guide for city staff, the Planning Commission, City Council, and other city boards and commissions, as they set policy and make investment and land use decisions.
The plan is designed as a flexible document that can be updated as conditions change over time.
⬚ figure
Broad Guiding Values For Comprehensive Plans
Sections to Include in All Comprehensive Plans
In 2010, the Iowa State Legislature passed the "Iowa Smart Planning Act" as a way to guide and encourage the development of local comprehensive plans. The legislation outlines ten smart planning principles and 13 comprehensive plan elements that Iowa cities should use to develop comprehensive plans. These guidelines are intended to improve economic opportunities, preserve the natural environment, protect quality of life, and ensure equitable decision-making processes.
The smart planning principles and comprehensive plan elements as defined in the legislation are listed above.
Though the sets of elements and principles may look similar, they differ in that the ten smart planning principles are meant to be the overarching values that inform each of the 13 elements of the plan.
The Cedar Rapids comprehensive plan was created in compliance with the guidelines of the Iowa Smart Planning Act. The plan addresses all 13 elements of a comprehensive plan required by the Iowa Smart Planning Act, but is organized in a format that fits Cedar Rapids' public engagement process and planning needs. Cedar Rapids received an Iowa smart planning grant that partially funded the creation of this plan.
UNDERSTANDING TRENDS
As Cedar Rapids prepares for its future, the first step in the process is to understand trends. Population projections help Cedar Rapids plan efficiently for future land use and community services. It is helpful to plan for a slightly optimistic growth rate. A one percent growth rate results in a 2035 population of about 1,000. This change raises immediate questions.
Cedar Rapids' residents and businesses are enormous community assets and their participation was essential to answering these, and many other, questions during the planning process.
CHART 1: Population Change and Projection
⬚ figure
CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS
THE CEDAR RAPIDS POPULATION IS CHANGING. RECENT TRENDS SHOW THE POPULATION IS AGING AND BECOMING MORE RACIALLY AND ETHNICALLY DIVERSE.
⬚ figure
2.3x: THE INCREASE IN CEDAR RAPIDS’ HISPANIC/LATINO POPULATION FROM 2000 - 2018.
THE INCREASE IN THE NON-WHITE POPULATION IN CEDAR RAPIDS, AS PERCENT OF TOTAL POPULATION, FROM 2000 TO 2018: 8% - 15%
This section of the plan describes outreach efforts of a community engagement program unprecedented in scope and its efforts to involve as many people from Cedar Rapids as possible. The campaign for maximizing communication and opportunities for the public input process include:
The steering committee was an important team of decision-makers and involved citizens focused on a vibrant future for Cedar Rapids, based on resident needs and recommendations. The steering committee met throughout the development of this plan, guiding the process overall and ensuring the people’s voices were well heard and considered.
Background materials related to the existing plan, past growth and land use, natural resources, neighborhoods, economy and a variety of other factors were developed to set the stage for understanding the importance of comprehensive planning. They also provided the starting point for building this plan and introducing the planning process to the steering committee, decision makers and the public-at-large.
Throughout the process, the public has been invited to share ideas and input via the city’s website, including participation in www.crtalks.com, directly e-mailing the Community Development Department (communitydevelopment@cedar-rapids.org) and/or participating via Twitter or Facebook. On March 24, 2014, the city also launched an on-line forum specific to EnvisionCR via Google Hangout. Panelists participating in the forum included representatives of the Iowa Cultural Corridor Alliance, Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation, Blue Zones, ImpactCR, and the Cedar Rapids Gazette. Public comments are viewable via the web through easy links from the EnvisionCR page on the city’s website.
On March 26, more than 300 residents engaged in a dynamic open house, that outlined essential content for the plan and seeking the public’s input on each of the categories:
At that kick-off event, and throughout the course of the public engagement process, the public was also asked to share its big ideas for the future of Cedar Rapids. Comments ranged from skate parks to support for industry and entrepreneurs. All comments were considered and many incorporated as the process moved forward – translating into principles, goals, initiatives, or additional critical background information for this document.
Throughout the process, but particularly in the winter and early spring of 2014, the consulting team and city Community Development staff conducted an ongoing series of conversations, reaching out to audiences from the following backgrounds:
These conversations included discussions of the city’s current strengths and challenges, potential opportunities, desired future, and obstacles to achieving that future. Comments of both a broad-sweeping and specific nature were encouraged. These sessions provided critical insight to prepare for additional conversation with the public and stakeholders and for direct input into this plan.
Two stakeholder workshops with 30-50 participants each were conducted to focus on key input aspects to the plan. The first workshop (March 26, 2014) involved visioning elements/big ideas and identifying gaps between a preferred future for Cedar Rapids and current conditions. A second workshop (June 17, 2014) saw the stakeholders developing goals, action steps, and considering measures of success.
EnvisionCR covers a large and diverse area. In order to address specific local issues, one week-long planning workshop was held, allowing the public to stop by throughout the week and essentially become part of the
planning team. They identified issues and expressed ideas for their neighborhoods and businesses in words, sketches, and maps. This workshop took place in April 2014.
Cedar Rapids may well lead the nation in involving youth in its comprehensive planning efforts, particularly through a series of highly interactive sessions involving four high school classrooms, reaching nearly 100 students. Initially, a member of the consulting team and/or city staff visited each classroom to gain insights into student likes/dislikes and big ideas for Cedar Rapids. These sessions were followed by a half-day event involving all classrooms at once, where students crafted visions, goals, and actions to move their community forward. They reported their results with a mix of flip chart bullet points, and dramatically more creative means (including art work and song). As one student put it at the conclusion of the event, “This makes me think I’d like to stay here after all.”
Articles, letters to the editor, radio and television interviews provided opportunities to communicate the plan’s purpose, objectives and emerging recommendations.
In addition to the kick-off celebration, two additional open houses provided key points of opportunity for public input and feedback on the plan as developed at that point in time. Held on August 27, 2014 and November 10, 2014, these open houses generated 100+ participants each and high quality feedback, including detailed review on the part of many citizens of the draft goals and initiatives using a pencil-and-paper feedback instrument.
By Kyle Skogman Published in Corridor Business Journal August 25, 2014
Public engagement can be a challenging and rewarding component of civic planning. Over the last several months, I’ve been encouraged to see the city facilitate meaningful dialogue as part of the new comprehensive plan, EnvisionCR.
I’ve been afforded the opportunity to advocate for diverse community and business representatives by participating on the EnvisionCR steering committee, a role that has allowed me to glimpse a wide-array of public feedback.
⬚ figure
This opportunity has only grown my respect for the varying perspectives we share as a community, and for the well-rounded structure the city is giving to their comprehensive plan.
Alongside representatives from non-profits, young professional networks, developers, business owners, educational professionals, corporations, and City Council members, the steering committee has helped champion the direction of the draft plan, and helped unravel a myriad of public feedback comments.
While our perspectives are diverse, we have found that our goals are very much the same. We see the need to keep building on the momentum of downtown, from Newbo to Kingston. We see the value and the importance of studying our transportation system – we want to avoid repeats of infrastructure that has brought frustrations or challenges. We have expressed a desire for a robust economic development strategy, giving traction to young entrepreneurs and making ourselves attractive to outside businesses.
Together, key stakeholders have wrestled with questions that fundamentally shape the Cedar Rapids landscape; questions like what does it mean to be an economic leader? How do we establish ourselves as the hub of the region? How can we promote mixed-use development? What can we do to ensure Cedar Rapids offers activities that appeal to a wide age range?
I have been proud to help facilitate this critical dialogue as Cedar Rapids moves forward with the next steps of their comprehensive plan.
(blank page)
⬚ figure
"There is no logic that can be superimposed on the city; people make it, and it is to them, not buildings, that we must fit our plans."
⬚ figure
DISCOVER A review of the public engagement process and trends indicated by previous plans, reports, and studies.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES The principles of the plan emerged through the public engagement process, and established the desirable conditions for Cedar Rapids' future.
ELEMENTS The structure of the plan is organized around six strategic elements, each providing goals and initiatives for public policy.
IMPLEMENTATION An ongoing process that uses and updates the plan.
⬚ figure
ACHIEVE A UNIFIED VISION
LIVE HEALTHY
STRENGTHEN NEIGHBORHOODS
KEEP BUSINESS VIBRANT
CONNECT THE CITY
EMBRACE THE OUTDOORS
STREAMLINE SERVICES
⬚ figure
ACHIEVE A UNIFIED VISION
LIVE HEALTHY
STRENGTHEN NEIGHBORHOODS
KEEP BUSINESS VIBRANT
CONNECT THE CITY
EMBRACE THE OUTDOORS
STREAMLINE SERVICES
As an urban center in an agricultural region, Cedar Rapids is comfortable in balancing diverse interests, exploring options, and supporting a broad spectrum of lives and livelihoods.
EnvisionCR's guiding principles reflect a community focused on a vibrant and dynamic future of lasting value - one that promotes public health, social engagement, a robust economy, natural resources and life-long learning. At the same time, Cedar Rapids embraces history and a future of artistic, cultural, scientific, and technical vitality.
The people of Cedar Rapids plan proactively for their future. Their conversations point to a set of principles that should shape the city's work ahead for years to come. It should be noted the four themes of sustainability, health, placemaking, and efficiency are ever present as an undercurrent to these guiding principles. These principles - intended to drive decision-making - are derived from the many stakeholder conversations and broad public input sessions held in support of this plan.
Theses principles, along with the goals and initiatives of this plan, also exist to support the City's vision statement, which describes a broad goal for the future of Cedar Rapids:
Cedar Rapids, a vibrant urban hometown—a beacon for people and businesses invested in building a greater community now and for the next generation.
⬚ figure
REGIONALISM
Cedar Rapids desires to facilitate a regional environment that supports not just individual community or neighborhood needs, but recognizes the importance of regional collaboration and regional vision. Participation in ICR Iowa, annexation and utility agreements, and the trails network serve as features in getting this work underway. Enhanced regional functions and goals need to be a part of the future of Cedar Rapids and its surroundings.
CREATIVE HUB OF THE CORRIDOR
Cedar Rapids’ role in ICR Iowa referenced above reinforces this concept of regionalism. The goal of ICR Iowa is to develop the seven county region surrounding Cedar Rapids and Iowa City into a nationally-recognized, prosperous region with creativity at its center. Cultural exchange, rather than single direction transfers, is essential to this vision. Cedar Rapids residents want to see NewBo, Paramount, the Czech-Slovak District, the McGrath Amphitheatre and more coalesce into a critical cultural mass with traction.
LIVE HEALTHY
⬚ figure
CREATE A HEALTHY AND DESIRABLE PLACE TO LIVE. Healthy places support residents’ mental and physical health and in so doing, quickly attain a “buzz” – a distinction as a place for families and young professionals to call home. Cedar Rapids has been designated a Bicycle Friendly Community and recently named an All-American City. These designations confirm Cedar Rapids’ alignment with this principle.
A COMMUNITY OF CHOICE Cedar Rapids’ residents ask for options. Many speak to a desire to embrace diversity in all things. They want to walk as well as ride, promote entrepreneurship while embracing industry, connect to the river or enjoy an upland neighborhood. They welcome an opportunity to design daily living that meets their personal, family, inter-generational, and cultural needs. Removing or reducing barriers to healthier choices, such as active transportation and eating fresh fruits and vegetables, should be a priority.
RESILIENT CITY A healthy community is one that can weather storms of many kinds—from natural disasters to economic downtowns. This applies at the City level, such as building infrastructure that can withstand damaging conditions, to the individual level, as physical, mental, and economic health supports households that can successfully face challenging conditions.
⬚ figure
STRENGTHEN THE QUALITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS’ NEIGHBORHOODS. CREATE HOUSING OPTIONS FOR ALL.
TRADITIONS AND FUTURE NEEDS Strong neighborhoods honor the traditions of the past, but keep a mindful eye to resident needs for the future – through social, cultural, work, health, learning and recreation opportunities. Historic preservation also helps play a key role in this endeavor. Developing neighborhoods rich in living options supports the community of choice theme and builds community character.
NEIGHBORHOOD HUBS PRESERVING COMMUNITY CHARACTER Neighbors speak to a need for greater empowerment, identity, and a resulting strengthening of character and community. Cedar Rapids residents ask for connections throughout Cedar Rapids, but they still desire hubs of vitality dispersed throughout the community - allowing each neighborhood its focal point, its distinction.
SOCIAL EQUITY Equity is a key component to building strong neighborhoods and communities. Inclusion of all, regardless of age, gender identity, race, income, and many other social characteristics, is an essential part of creating a more equitable society. Considering the needs of our most vulnerable residents helps build stronger neighborhoods for all.
KEEP BUSINESS VIBRANT
⬚ figure
REINVEST IN THE CITY’S BUSINESS DISTRICTS. COMPETE SUCCESSFULLY FOR PRIVATE INVESTMENT.
Cedar Rapids continues to support and benefit from the long-term employers, many with agricultural, technological or other innovative roots. New opportunities emerge through entrepreneurship, incubators, and innovation corridors. Cedar Rapids has enjoyed success through attracting small satellites of larger businesses and encouraging their local growth.
DOWNTOWN VITALITY
Residents want to provide the foundation for experiences both tactile and technological, adventurous and reflective, entrepreneurial and artisan. The public sees the current downtown as mostly business interests, but they aspire to see boutiques, start-ups, and artful spaces. They love NewBo and want more.
SKILLED WORKERS
Industry and economic development experts want Cedar Rapids to better integrate education and specific work-force needs in the community. They speak of a potential shortfall in the jobs they need filled and what the workforce can provide. Interest in improved integration of Cedar Rapids' dynamic education centers into the fabric of the community surfaces here. Ongoing dialogue between businesses and academia are important.
INDUSTRY EMBRACED
Industry has been and remains a key piece of Cedar Rapids' economy and identity. Cedar Rapids should embrace that history and tell its story, as it supports the development and expansion of industry and technology today.
⬚ figure
Cedar Rapids’ growth of the future includes increased linkages and/or bringing services and choices together for access, collaboration, and synergism. Connections between people are as important as connections between places.
PLACES AND PATHS Residents seek physical connections that reflect the “community choice” theme. Walking, cycling, and public transportation must be as accessible as options for the car. Closer proximity of areas where residents can live, work, learn, and play allow for easy pathways and/or merged services.
HUMAN CONNECTION Foster community connection, both between neighbors and between residents and the City. Neighborhood Associations, supported by City Staff, are one path to increase connections between neighborhoods. City communications, such as press releases, social media, and the quarterly OurCR magazine, along with direct connections with residents can help build a strong relationship and trust between the City and the residents we serve.
⬚ figure
PRESERVE NATURAL AREAS AND MANAGE IMPACTS. ESTABLISH A PREMIER SYSTEM FOR PARKS AND RECREATION.
A post-flood Cedar Rapids has already made great strides in embracing its natural systems. Relatively recent studies speak to the value of environmentally sensitive areas and large tracts of habitat to support diverse plants and wildlife. Residents need nature integrated into daily living for physical and mental health.
A GREENER CITY The riverfront greenway is just one piece of a community seeking at every turn to make its mark in the arena of sustainability. Pockets of dynamic social spaces coupled with relatively high per capita park acres have inspired residents and leaders to promote public health in daily living, to support restoration, multi-family housing, energy conservation and alternative fuels, complete streets, sustainable sites, easy-access trails - the list goes on. They ask for a community that makes a commitment to sustainability.
EMBRACE THE RIVER As the City develops the Flood Control System, it is important to maintain our connection with the Cedar River. We should recognize our river as an asset and enhance opportunities for residents to connect with nature and enjoy recreation opportunities on and around the river.
STREAMLINE SERVICES
⬚ figure
PROVIDE EFFICIENT URBAN SERVICES.
STREAMLINED GOVERNMENT, EFFECTIVE PARTNERSHIPS Many see the public-private partnership - in varied configurations - as one of the paths to Cedar Rapids' future success. They see those partnerships most enriched through government systems that foster collaboration and coordination. One-stop-shops, all stakeholder roundtables and consistency across boundaries in rules and rule-making surface as potential tools for Cedar Rapids' progressive future.
CONTINUAL INNOVATION The City of Cedar Rapids has a strong culture of innovation and adaptability, which has served well to allow the City to react to unanticipated events and circumstances. This philosophy should continue to grow as we strive to improve services and react to ever changing conditions.
The Future Land Use Map shows the future land use designations for existing land uses and longer term growth areas. This map shows land use transitions that will not occur for many years, beyond the 2035 time frame.
The future land use map is based on the guiding principles and adopt an intensity-based approach to managing land development.
The map depicts new land uses for privately owned properties. The transition of these properties from their current use to the depicted use is expected to occur over time, in response to market demands, as property owners voluntarily sell, develop, or change the use of their land.
The Future Land Use Map presents the land uses envisioned for the future. The new land uses represented on this map will transition over time, as property owners voluntarily sell, develop, or change their property.
The Future Land Use map provides flexibility for a variety of land uses within each Land Use Typology Area (LUTA). The map should provide guidance for:
Guide for Land Use Decisions. The Future Land Use map will guide the land use and development decisions of the City Planning Commission and the City Council. As such, it serves to inform property owners and encourage development proposals that are consistent with the community vision.
MAP 1: Future Land Use Map
⬚ figure
Due to the dynamic nature of the Future Land Use Map, all instances of this map shown in this document are intended to be illustrative and may not show the most up to date LUTA. The official Future Land Use Map shall be maintained by the city and made available online at crgis.cedar-rapids.org/FLUM or upon request.
(blank page)
⬚ figure
"Isn't it astonishing that all of these secrets have been preserved for so many years just so we could discover them!"
⬚ figure
DISCOVER A review of the public engagement process and trends indicated by previous plans, reports, and studies.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES The principles of the plan emerged through the public engagement process, and established the desirable conditions for Cedar Rapids' future.
ELEMENTS The structure of the plan is organized around six strategic elements, each providing goals and initiatives for public policy.
IMPLEMENTATION An ongoing process that uses and updates the plan.
STRATEGIC APPROACH TO ACCOMPLISHING GOALS
The elements of this plan, with their associated goals, are as follows:
StrengthenCR. Make bold moves in community planning to retain the character of neighborhoods and corridors.
GrowCR. Make bold moves in future planning to encourage sustainable connections of growth areas to existing neighborhoods.
ConnectCR. Create a culture that enhances transportation options for pedestrians and cyclists through complete streets, trails, and public transportation.
GreenCR. Buffer and connect existing parks, trails, and streams to build a natural network in addition to regional collaborations and individual efforts to improve stormwater management, water quality, wildlife habitat, and outdoor recreation.
InvestCR. Make Cedar Rapids a desirable place for businesses to start, move, and grow by leveraging resources to invest in business districts and amenities that keep and attract a skilled workforce.
ProtectCR. Provide quality services to increase neighborhood safety and keep moving forward with the flood control system.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
STRENGTHENCR
StrengthenCR focuses on strengthening Cedar Rapids’ neighborhoods. This element covers topics related to land use, housing, mobility, services and infrastructure, and other topics important to neighborhoods. This element identifies specific strategies and initiatives to ensure Cedar Rapids is a city of strong and vibrant neighborhoods, and also outlines an approach to planning for its diverse communities.
EnvisionCR provides the foundation for all future planning efforts. Recognizing that planning is continually happening, StrengthenCR outlines an approach to planning that provides a mechanism for neighborhoods, residents, and other stakeholders to work with the city to develop plans that respond to their diverse needs and contexts. Specifically, StrengthenCR outlines four types of planning initiatives:
All action plans will be tailored toward the unique geographic, demographic, and social diversity of each area. They will involve stakeholders, including but not limited to residents, businesses, property owners, city departments, regional agencies, and adjacent jurisdictions. At a minimum plans will be developed using the following guidelines also shown in Figure 1:
⬚ figure
Visual Preference Survey
A visual preference survey, or an equivalent, will aid in determining those aspects of development character deemed to be positive and negative. This technique asks stakeholders to score images that illustrate various elements of development character.
Based on the feedback from the visual preference survey on what types of development are considered positive and what types are considered negative, a character analysis will be conducted. The character analysis examines the built environment and determines the positive and negative development features and identifies the dominant development characteristics – both positive and negative.
A review of the development regulations is an important part of any planning effort. Based on the results of the character analysis, development regulations can be reviewed to evaluate whether they support the maintenance of the positive characteristics and provide tools to correct the negative characteristics. If existing regulations are inconsistent with this analysis, recommendations for revisions of current regulations or the creation of new regulations should be incorporated into the list of identified policy initiatives and action steps.
Figure 2 is a diagram of the various planning efforts that show the relationship to EnvisionCR. Neighborhood Action Plans, Area Action Plans, and Corridor Action Plans act as components of EnvisionCR, the foundational document, and must be consistent with its goals.
FIGURE 1: Minimum Plan Development Guidelines
⬚ figure
An example of an approach to a Character Analysis:
General Character:
Street and Block Patterns:
Building Placement and Location:
Building Height:
Mobility:
Some areas of Cedar Rapids do not have a formal neighborhood group. Without encouragement by city officials, neighborhood groups typically only form and become active to address ongoing serious neighborhood issues or take advantage of a specific opportunity. For example, many of today’s more active neighborhood groups were re-invigorated in response to the flood of 2008. However, this often leaves many neighborhoods without a clear impetus to organize, despite the potential benefits. In order to encourage more neighborhoods to become active and organize, the city created a Neighborhood Certification Program.
Currently, Cedar Rapids has 10 registered neighborhood associations, as shown in Map 1. Neighborhood groups can be a huge benefit to a community – they can help plan and support neighborhood improvements, create a stronger sense of community, and act as a liaison with the city.
To date, the focus of Cedar Rapids' neighborhood planning efforts has been on the downtown and central city neighborhoods. These neighborhoods were most impacted by the 2008 flood, and the flood recovery process created an immediate need to plan for the future of these neighborhoods. In each of these planning processes, neighborhood residents, property owners, business people, and other stakeholders were brought together to identify neighborhood issues and develop goals and strategies to address the most serious problems.
While the planning that has occurred since the 2008 flood has been successful, many areas of the city may benefit from more specific, targeted planning efforts. These planning efforts will allow a more detailed look at the city's diverse communities.
StrengthenCR outlines an approach to future planning efforts and establishes a process by which residents and other stakeholders may engage in a planning process that addresses the issues and identifies the opportunities unique to individual communities. Specifically, Neighborhood Action Plans, which are reserved for certified neighborhood associations, will be developed.
Neighborhoods are often defined by a combination of factors, ranging from social to economic, but the physical geography of the community typically plays a fundamental role. The series of maps in this section illustrates the physical
The Wellington Heights Neighborhood Plan is an example of a Neighborhood Action Plan. Visit:
www.cedar-rapid.org/government/departments/community-development
features that in many cases help to define neighborhoods.
Over time new neighborhood groups will form, and this is encouraged through the city's Neighborhood Certification Program. The focus of Neighborhood Action Plans is on these formally organized groups of citizens with defined neighborhood boundaries. Within these areas, the city is committed to working with neighborhood groups and other stakeholders on the development of future Neighborhood Action Plans.
FIGURE 2: EnvisionCR Planning Program
⬚ figure
MAP 1: Registered Neighborhood Associations in Cedar Rapids - 2023
⬚ figure
The City continually tracks the progress of the Neighborhood Certification Program work plan projects. Neighborhood groups should seek to be recognized by the city as a Certified Neighborhood. Receiving the designation will assist in communication between grassroots interests and projects and possible support from the city.
The City also provides the Neighborhood Service Delivery Program (NSD) to existing and newly formed neighborhood associations. NSD consists of programs and tools organized by the city to deliver to neighborhoods, with the goals of addressing issues such as safety, maintenance, infrastructure, connectivity, and city responsiveness; building relationships among neighborhoods; bringing government closer to people; and increasing visibility.
Neighborhood Action Plans, initiated by the city or neighborhood group, are strategic plans supported by the city. The Westdale Area Action Plan was adopted in December of 2022.
The character and quality of neighborhoods and corridors help define the city. In addition, improving the quality of these areas improves perceptions, provides a strong sense of place, and helps to attract and retain a vibrant population. Making improvements and enhancing the quality of the city's diverse communities requires an approach to planning that incorporates the unique character of each area, but also considers a variety of topics that impact all communities.
Every community is unique, but many communities' most celebrated areas have an integrated mix of land use and a multi-modal transportation system that meets the needs of all users. In planning for Cedar Rapids' communities, it is important to consider how land use patterns impact people's mobility. Promoting multiple land uses and higher intensities, as opposed to low-density sprawl, encourages biking, walking, and transit use. This also promotes a more active lifestyle and leads to healthier and more sustainable communities.
Promoting infill development is a land use strategy that reduces the amount of land consumed and also reduces the cost of providing infrastructure and services. Development on vacant and underutilized sites that have access to public utilities is encouraged.
Brownfield sites, which are environmentally contaminated or potentially contaminated sites, also provide opportunities for infill development. There are challenges to developing these sites, as costs for remediation are often expensive.
In many cases, financing, incentives, or other programs are necessary in order to promote redevelopment on brownfields. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources maintains an inventory of contaminated sites, which provides useful information for planning purposes.
Restoring the historic fabric in neighborhoods is a tool for economic development. For example, adapting the Water Tower Place introduced housing in NewBo, which ultimately became a catalyst for additional neighborhood investment. These examples, along with hundreds of projects completed throughout Iowa, are examples of how historic preservation can stimulate new investment in existing neighborhoods.
In addition to a mix of land uses and a variety of transportation options, design, including sustainable design, as well as arts and cultural and historic preservation can improve the overall health of a community.
Cedar Rapids has a rich history that stretches over more than a century. This history is partially reflected in the city's older buildings and important sites, most notably in and surrounding downtown but also in some residential and mixed use areas outside of the central district, such as the Czech Village. In addition, features that older adults consider relatively "new" now qualify for historic designations. For example, buildings constructed in the mid 1950s now meet the 50-year old guideline used by the National Register of Historic Places. These buildings and sites are important assets for the city, provide the possibility of significant economic return, and help tell the city's story.
Much of the design for older neighborhoods focused on having sidewalks that connected people to schools, parks, neighborhood commercial; porches that engaged the neighborhood; trees and landscaping that framed the street; and garages were subordinate to the home and tucked behind the main facade. These distinctive characteristics of Cedar Rapids' pre-WWII neighborhoods are positive neighborhood attributes that need to be preserved and emulated.
Infill development should respect the established urban character of the neighborhood and reinforce design that promotes walkability, convenience, and engagement with neighbors. Incentive programs could be designed to support private initiatives that encourage walkable characteristics.
The Community Climate Action Plan calls for a Sustainable Business Program (Carbon-Free Action 3, page 31). The program, called Community Leaders, will enhance sustainable building practices (energy efficiency, clean energy, electrification, water, waste reduction) and land-use practices (trees, green infrastructure, gardens, bicycling facilities). The Green Homes program guides and celebrates sustainability action in neighborhoods, supporting the mission of the Community Climate Action Plan (Carbon-Free Action 1, page 29)..
The presence of cultural facilities can enhance specific districts (neighborhoods/areas/ etc.) and the community as a whole. These can include museums, performance spaces, galleries, civic buildings, public art and other public and private institutions. Existing cultural resources are an important part of the community and should be incorporated into future plans. Community planning efforts should identify opportunities to enhance districts with public art, gateway features and the thoughtful placement of potential future cultural facilities.
MAP 2: 15-Minute Walk Time near Schools
⬚ figure
Connection to Schools
Neighborhood schools are the core of a neighborhood. Map 2 shows the school locations of the school districts that serve Cedar Rapids. The identity of many Cedar Rapids’ neighborhoods is wrapped up in their schools – they are the focal point of the neighborhood, they create a gathering place for nearby residents, and often provide an attractive amenity by offering playgrounds and green space that are open to the public. Neighborhood schools are an important part of what attracts people to live in a neighborhood, and they play a role in creating the emotional connection that keeps residents there over time. This emotional component has a tangible effect on whether residents continue to invest in their properties and neighborhoods, and is thus a critical part of preventing neighborhood deterioration.
Map 3 identifies a 15-minute walk time around individual schools. These areas are priority areas for maintaining and improving connectivity in neighborhoods. Overcoming barriers to walkability will increase the number of people on sidewalks. These include:
Physical Barriers. Natural and built features can limit walkability and convenience. These features include rivers, steep slopes, busy streets, poor connection among streets, and lack of sidewalks.
Psychological Barriers. Aside from the physical barriers, walkers are influenced by their sense of security - their level of anxiety while traveling to their destination. Poor lighting and distressed housing/property can influence a person’s decision to walk to school, visit a friend by bike, run an errand, exercise and other routine activities.
strengthencr 43
MAP 3: National Register of Historic Places - Listed Districts
⬚ figure
Historic Resources
Historic resources are an important part of Cedar Rapids' identity. They enhance quality of life, economic vitality, and environmental sustainability, which can lead to a community's overall space well being. Investment in these assets is a priority of the City of Cedar Rapids, and therefore, future planning efforts should carefully consider the role of historic preservation.
Map 4 outlines the city's nine national historic districts.
Local and National Districts
National Districts Only
Historic Preservation Plan
The City's first Historic Preservation Plan (HPP) was adopted by the City Council on September 22, 2015. The HPP was one of eight identified measures to help mitigate the loss of historic properties from the 2008 flood as outlined in the terms of a Memorandum of Agreement in August of 2011. The HPP outlines the City's vision for historic preservation and the components of the preservation program. The preservation program consists of five parts:
The HPP identifies 10 overarching goals focused on preservation, which have policies and initiatives within them to help achieve the community's vision for preservation.
MAP 4: EnvisionCR Corridor Action Plan Locations
The Highway 100 Corridor Management Plan is an example of an Area Action Plan. This plan is a partnership between the Corridor Metropolitan Planning Organization, the City of Cedar Rapids, and Linn County. The plan will include a development concept and provide recommendations on development phasing, serviceability, parks, and infrastructure needs.
Historic resources are an important part of Cedar Rapids' identity. They enhance quality of life, economic vitality, and environmental sustainability, which can lead to a community's overall space well being. Investment in these assets is a priority of the City of Cedar Rapids, and therefore, future planning efforts should carefully consider the role of historic preservation.
Map 4 outlines the city's nine national historic districts.
The City's first Historic Preservation Plan (HPP) was adopted by the City Council on September 22, 2015. The HPP was one of eight identified measures to help mitigate the loss of historic properties from the 2008 flood as outlined in the terms of a Memorandum of Agreement in August of 2011. The HPP outlines the City's vision for historic preservation
⬚ figure
SOURCE: CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, HR GREEN, INC., RDG PLANNING & DESIGN
Cedar Rapids Plans
MAP 5: Center Point Road Opportunities
⬚ figure
Gateways
Catalyst Sites
Key Intersection
Policy Areas
Landscaping
NW Neighborhood Area Action Plan is an example of a Corridor Action Plan. Although described as an area plan, the Northwest Neighborhood Plan focused on the main corridor of the area - Ellis Boulevard - and explored options to create a viable business corridor.
• Gateways. Gateways mark the arrival to the district. Signage, landscaping, art installations, and graphics are all possible features at gateways.
• Access Management. Corridor requires further study for improving the safety and circulation of vehicles entering the street from adjacent properties.
• Landscaping. Basic landscaping enhancements that may include shrubs, flowers, maintained lawn, and other plantings.
• Streetscaping. Enhancements may include landscaping, sidewalk improvements, street furniture, lighting, and graphics.
• Streetscaping Master Plan. Public initiative and probable financing to establish a uniform approach.
• Enhanced Greenspace. Large open spaces along corridors should be well-maintained.
| ▓▓▓▓ | Catalyst Sites | ╍╍╍╍╍ | Railroad |
| ▒▒▒▒ | Policy Areas | ●●●●● | Connecting Streets |
| █ | Greenspace | Waterway | |
| █ | Enhanced Greenspace | ∰∰∰ | Streetscaping |
| ⊚ | Key Intersection | ⬚⬚⬚⬚ | Access Mangement |
| ✿ | Gateway Node |
MAP 6: Collins Road Opportunities
⬚ figure
Streetscaping
Streetscaping Master Plan
Access Management
Gateway
| ▓ Catalyst Sites | ╍ Railroad |
| █ Policy Areas | ●●●●● Connecting Streets |
| ■ Greenspace | — Waterway |
| █ Enhanced Greenspace | ∿ Streetscaping |
| ⊚ Key Intersection | □□□□ Access Mangement |
| ☼ Gateway Node |
strengthencr 47
The city's housing stock should accommodate residents of all life stages, incomes, and preferences. Providing a variety of housing choices helps to attract and retain residents and contributes to overall community vitality.
Cedar Rapids should continue to integrate a variety of housing types in existing and new growth areas. Land development ordinances should provide adequate flexibility to accommodate innovative and economical designs within traditional town patterns. Some of these configurations may include:
Neighborhoods may include a mix of housing types and target multiple price points in the market, allowing for a mix of housing options and incomes.
The preservation of existing neighborhoods and housing stock becomes especially important when there is a shortage of affordable units. Indeed, rehabilitation and preventive maintenance are the city’s most cost-effective ways to assuring a continued supply of good housing. Neighborhood conservation strategies include:
In addition to conventional rehabilitation programs, Cedar Rapids should promote the use of programs which help to convert existing rental housing stock to owner-occupancy in targeted neighborhoods. These programs include the FHA 203(K) program, an FHA mortgage insurance program, which combines loans for purchase and rehabilitation of property into a single, unified loan.
Development and enforcement of a strong housing standards ordinance, together with upgrading the housing stock through new affordable construction, can put significant competitive pressure on these units to upgrade or leave the market.
The primary regulatory tool that impacts housing type and affordability is zoning. Through the zoning code the city has the ability to shape the type of land uses it desires by location and to determine a baseline for appearance standards for those uses.
Through the adoption of local zoning standards, there is the potential that a community can develop “exclusionary” housing policies that limit the availability of housing. This often results in the community limiting housing to primarily expensive single-family homes, prohibiting smaller-lot affordable homes and severely limiting multi-family housing.
Cedar Rapids’ zoning code shows little evidence of exclusionary housing policies. Specifically, the zoning code promotes housing on smaller lots that can help to promote affordable homeownership by allowing less expensive smaller lots in new developments. In addition, a mix of land uses, especially commercial and residential mix use, are allowed and encouraged in multiple zones. The land use approach outlined in EnvisionCR will further help to promote a mix of land uses and a variety of housing types.
Many other elements of the zoning code also affect housing diversity, affordability, and accessibility. Therefore, as part of the city’s comprehensive update to the zoning code (see StrengthenCR Goal #2), the city will explore the allowance of density bonuses for affordable housing, second units, and joint live/work units in certain zoning districts.
ADU section of the zoning code was expanded in 2022. Completed 2023
Providing housing opportunities to low and moderate income housing, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the homeless is particularly important to the city since these groups often do not have the resources to participate in private sector housing.
Since the 2008 flood, the city has commissioned housing market analyses periodically to monitor absorption of replacement housing. Maxfield Research, Inc. prepared a comprehensive housing needs analysis for Cedar Rapids in October 2016, as seen in Table 1. The report includes a snapshot of Cedar Rapids' demographics, housing characteristics, rental housing market analysis, senior housing market analysis, for-sale housing market analysis, and finally housing needs analysis.
Recommendations outlined in the most recent housing study align with the goals of StrengthenCR. They include:
⬚ figure
The housing study includes a number of specific recommendations regarding the accommodation of various types of senior housing. There is pent-up demand for additional subsidized senior rental units. City support of these efforts will range from supporting rezoning requests for project sites to potentially partnering with developers where market conditions require a public subsidy.
Contact Community Development at City Hall for the most recent copy of the Comprehensive Housing Needs Analysis.
| Table 1: Housing Needs Analysis Update | |
|---|---|
| Housing Demand, 2016-2025 | Number of Units |
| Market Rate Rental | 1,201 |
| Shallow-Subsidy Rental | 1,039 |
| Deep-Subsidy Rental | 665 |
| For-Sale Single-family | 1,314 |
| For-Sale Multifamily | 432 |
| Total | 4,651 |
| Senior Housing Demand, 2016 | Number of Units |
| Active Adult Market Rate Ownership | 349 |
| Active Adult Market Rate Rental | 370 |
| Market Rate Congregate | 184 |
| Market Rate Assisted Living | -3 |
| Market Rate Memory Care | 255 |
| Active Adult Shallow & Deep Subsidy | 898 |
| Total | 2,053 |
Source: Maxfield Research and Consulting, September 2023 (pg 113)
⬚ figure
The Maxfield Housing Study reports:
According to the Maxfield Housing Study, there are 43 age-restricted housing facilities in the metro with subsidized senior units totaling 3,800. As of September of 2023, the overall vacancy for senior properties was estimated to be 5.6%. Deep-subsidy and shallow-subsidy units had a 0% vacancy rate, many with waiting lists for units.
The city currently administers the federally-subsidized Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program, providing rental housing assistance to low-income residents. In 2023, a total of 1,030 families received assistance under the program. The city opened its waiting list for vouchers for one day in 2022 and received 1,300 applications. The waiting list is closed again and is not estimated to be opened again for another three years.
Beginning in 2024, the city will administer a single-family replacement housing program, locally known as Rebuilding Ownership Opportunities Together (“ROOTs”) 2.0 that provides incentives for replacement of owner-occupied housing. Low and moderate income buyers can purchase a new, energy efficient, affordable home and receive down payment assistance of up to $35,000. The program will create 101 new housing units in an effort to replace housing lost in the 2020 derecho. A companion Multi-family New Construction Program will produce 199 replacement rental units, 51% of which must be affordable to low and moderate renters. Additionally, an owner-occupied housing rehabilitation program will allow for up to 50 low to moderate-income households to receive assistance with repairs needed from derecho damage.into standard condition. The Comprehensive Rehabilitation Program assists 5-10 homeowners annually.
Programs assists approximately 40 homeowners annually with emergency repairs that prevent the home from becoming uninhabitable. A Comprehensive Rehabilitation Program assists low and moderate-income homeowners with more substantial repairs that bring the entire property into standard condition. The Comprehensive Rehabilitation Program assists 5-10 homeowners annually.
Saving Properties and Revitalizing Communities (SPARC) program was adopted in 2023 and addresses vacant and abandoned properties. Completed 2023
Barriers have been addressed with the Alliance for Equitable Housing. The organization is a multi-jurisdictional collaboration for developing a comprehensive housing solutions plan. Completed 2023
⬚ figure
(blank page)
⬚ figure
GROWCR
⬚ figure
Cedar Rapids' ability to develop and redevelop land within the city limits is vital to its future. City policy should encourage quality development and redevelopment within the City limits and ensure that adequate land is available to accommodate anticipated development. During the last twenty-five years, Cedar Rapids has grown from a community of 108,000 people to 130,000. Physically, the city has expanded with residential subdivisions emerging on the fringe of the built areas and commercial development becoming even more decentralized along corridors. These patterns and changes have created a dispersed city pattern, often separating services and jobs from where people live. Thoughtful and useful policies help coordinate development and unify the city's development patterns, filling in gaps and expanding when necessary.
This section establishes the basic program for land development in Cedar Rapids during the next twenty years. This element works to manage growth for the long-term benefit of the city. Population growth and changing markets will continue to create demand for new housing and neighborhoods in Cedar Rapids. New population and trends will generate demand for commercial development. Economic development and diversification efforts will require new employment areas for changing needs. Despite this element's emphasis on growth, the plan's focus steers development toward infill projects to existing areas of the community.
Flooding circumstances of the past force Cedar Rapids to be even more proactive to shape its future, rather than merely react to demands resulting from devastation. Development should not occur randomly, and its appropriate management and direction will contribute to the quality of the city. Indeed, present and prospective residents of cities increasingly demand more attractive and convenient communities. Cedar Rapids' character and quality will be important to future marketing and development within the City limits. New growth centers should be part of a coordinated policy leading to a stronger community.
This section considers the amount of development needed to accommodate the city's projected 2035 population of 161,073 (1% annual growth rate). It establishes a strategy to guide the city's growth, based on the premise that new growth is critical to Cedar Rapids' success as a community. Investments in the city's infrastructure, transportation system, public facilities, and community services should be designed to serve growth efficiently.
This section begins with an in-depth discussion of a new approach to development regulations and therefore, growth management. Following the discussion of Land Use Typology Areas (LUTAs), the specific goals are addressed.
⬚ figure
Contemporary growth in American cities has tended to “zone” different land uses away from one another. The concept of single-use zoning grew out of a need to separate places in which people lived from major industries in order to protect their health. In some cases, neighboring uses can produce so much traffic, noise, smells, or other environmental effects that separation remains the most appropriate policy. But, increasingly, mixing of compatible but different uses creates interesting and attractive communities. A development pattern that encourages a mix of land uses and activities increases the vitality and sense of security of a place and increases the number of people using public spaces. A variety of uses closer to one another can also reduce the number of miles that people must travel by car to conduct their daily lives.
A mixed land use pattern opens up opportunities to build a variety of housing types. The development of housing above office and commercial establishments adds vitality to business areas and increases the economic yield on property. Nationally, more communities are finding that by mixing land uses, neighborhoods are more attractive to workers who are looking at quality of life criteria when determining where to settle. Plans and land development policies that provide appropriate mixing of use also provide greater flexibility for those who build communities and avoid unnecessary regulation.
To achieve these goals, Cedar Rapids uses a framework of Land Use Typology Areas (“LUTAs”)1. The LUTA framework allows differentiation between areas of the city and the types, forms, and intensities of development allowed in each area.
On the following pages, LUTAs are described in terms of their purpose, form, uses, intensity, and compatibility requirements. The descriptions of LUTAs provide a sequence for land use designations with increasing levels of intensity. It is therefore appropriate to compare them one to another when reading descriptions. If, for example, Urban Medium Intensity is described as being more intense, it is understood that it is more intense than the previously described LUTA, which is Urban Low Intensity.
The LUTA framework relies on several core concepts, described below:
In the LUTA concept, several different factors are used to describe present and future land uses. Most people are already familiar with the idea of land uses, such as residential or commercial. However, many of the LUTAs incorporate areas that have more than one of these broad categories. The LUTA concept adds designations based on how much development occurs in an area and how that development affects its neighbors. This is measured by intensity and/or density of development.
One advantage of the LUTA concept is its ability to integrate, rather than separate, different land uses, providing both more interest and more efficiency in the city. Uses may be integrated in two ways: horizontally and vertically.
Horizontal integration keeps individual building purposes separate, but allows neighboring buildings to contain different, compatible uses. Vertical integration puts more than one use in the same building.
One of the most important concerns in land use planning is the relationship between different uses and their relative compatibility with each other. In suburban style areas where densities are low, compatibility is usually achieved by spacing between buildings and by congregating like uses together. This simple method is easy to administer and understand; however it leads to some undesirable conditions such as increased commute times with employment and residential areas being further separated from each other. It creates an automobile dependent city, which leads to un-walkable neighborhoods, congestion, and increased transportation expenses.
Compatibility in today’s world can be attained in a more sophisticated way by focusing on the performance of various uses and designing regulations that allow greater integration of uses. If carefully done, the integration of uses can be achieved to shorten commute times, create walkable, interesting neighborhoods, and preserve privacy, security, and aesthetics. The LUTAs described below exist on a continuum of intensity. This leads to a continuum of compatibility methods. That is to say, as LUTAs become more intense and uses become more integrated, compatibility methods focus less on spacing and congregating of similar uses, and more on performance-based methods that directly address issues such as noise, traffic, air quality, privacy, and aesthetics.
The LUTAs concept emerged from the comprehensive planning process in Oklahoma City and was originally authored by its staff. ↩
At its most basic measure, density is a calculation of how many dwelling (housing) units are in a given area. This is typically measured as dwelling units per acre, calculated using the net area of the project site. All proposed residential densities must fit within the range specified by the LUTA for the particular property. Higher density does not always mean apartments or rental properties. While multi-unit can have higher densities than other types of housing developments, it is possible for housing with higher density to be owner occupied. Missing Middle housing refers to those housing types that are in between single-family homes and large-scale, multi-family developments and integrated into neighborhoods with a variety of housing types.
⬚ figure
The homes toward the left in the image above can fit within the development patterns of a traditional neighborhood and provide housing options which are compatible with the scale and density of detached, single-unit housing. Development of Missing Middle housing in neighborhoods with single-unit housing allows for a variety of styles and price points within the same area. This mixture of housing types also makes transitioning from one housing style to another possible. This gives residents the opportunity to stay in the same area as their housing needs change over the course of their lives.
Horizontal integration of uses means that different uses are housed in different buildings, but are adjacent and related to each other.
⬚ figure
Vertical integration of uses means that different uses are located in the same buildings.
⬚ figure
UNDERSTANDING COMPATIBILITY
Table 1 shows the types of land uses proposed to be included in each of the LUTAs. EnvisionCR includes both location standards and criteria and compatibility standards for land uses. Table 2 shows the compatibility between different types of land use and each LUTA. Table 3 provides characteristics and considerations for each LUTA.
The relationship between different land uses and their relative compatibility with each other is important to successful execution of an integrated land use concept. Compatibility measures the ability by which different uses may be near or adjacent to each other without impacting either property.
EnvisionCR includes both:
⬚ figure
FIGURE 4: Transitions in Land Use Intensities
LAND USE TYPOLOGY AREA SUMMARY
Table 1: Land Use Typology Areas
| Land Use Typology Area | Description/Purpose | Residential density (du/A) | Non-residential or Mixed-use intensity (FAR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AP Agricultural Preserve | Areas preserved for permanent farming and agricultural production. | 1 unit/40 acres max | NA |
| R Rural | Areas that are unlikely to receive urban services. Agriculture and very low-density development will be the probable final use. | 1 unit/2 acres max | NA |
| U-LL Urban-Large Lot | Areas with urban services including very low-density residential constrained by environmental elements, such as steep slopes, waterways, and woodlands. | 0-6 | 0.50 max. |
| U-LI Urban-Low Intensity | Areas with urban services including relatively low-density residential and neighborhood commercial and service uses. | 2-12 | 0.50 max. |
| U-MI Urban-Medium Intensity | Areas with urban services including medium-density residential and neighborhood and community commercial, office, and service uses. | 4-24 | 1.0 max. |
| U-HI Urban-High Intensity | Areas with urban services including medium and high-density residential, major commercial, office, and service uses, and limited industrial in suitable locations. | 8-40 | 3.0 max. |
| DT Downtown | High-intensity mixed uses focused on Downtown and immediate environs. | 20 and up | 1.0 and up |
| C Commercial | Areas dominated by major community and regional commercial development that are both large in scale and have high traffic impact. May include high-density residential use. | 16-40 | 1.0 max. |
| I Industrial | Areas dominated by large-scale industrial uses. | NA | NA |
| ER Employment Reserve | Areas reserved for future large employers. | NA | NA |
| P Public, Semi-Public | Areas with major, typically land-intensive public,semi-public, or other civic uses. | NA | NA |
| OS Open Space | Areas intended to provide open space recreational uses, such as local and regional parks and for the preservation of environmentally sensitive areas. May include accessory or complementary uses if permitted by flood plain or other environmental regulations. | NA | NA |
| UR Urban Reserve Overlay | Areas that are unlikely to be served by urban infrastructure during the planning period but will be feasibly served and needed for urban development in the long-term. | 1 unit/40 acres max | NA |
| EC Environmental Conservation Overlay | Areas will remain undeveloped due to sensitive environmental features and habitat. | NA | NA |
| FC Flood Control Study Area | Areas of the community currently under study for planned flood control project. | NA | NA |
The table displays the range of typology areas that apply to Cedar Rapids. The majority of the city's area falls into U-LI, U-MI, and U-HI.
Table 2: Land Use Compatibility
| Land Uses | AP Agriculture Preserve | R Rural | U-LL Urban Large Lot | U-LI Urban Low Intensity | U-MI Urban Medium Intensity | U-HI Urban High Intensity | DT Downtown | C Commercial | I Industrial | ER Employment Reserve | P Public, Semi-Public | OS Open Space | UR Urban Reserve Overlay | FC Flood Control Study Area |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture (agriculture and related activities) | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||
| Single-family residential | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ||||||||
| Two-family residential | ○ | ● | ● | ○ | ||||||||||
| Multi-family residential | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||||
| Rural commercial (commercial uses that are compatible with rural and agricultural uses) | ○ | ● | ● | |||||||||||
| Neighborhood commercial (Small scale commercial development appropriate for neighborhood settings. Includes smaller shops, convenience stores, restaurants and offices) | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ○ | |||||||
| Community commercial (Commercial developments which serve larger areas of the community and require access to arterial roads, such as supermarkets, medium sized office buildings, restaurants, and medium size retail centers) | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ○ | |||||||
| Regional commercial (Regionally significant office and commercial uses, such as shopping centers, malls, and major retailers) | ○ | ○ | ● | |||||||||||
| Limited industrial (light industrial uses, such as light manufacturing, assembly, warehousing, and distribution) | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | |||||||||
| Intensive industrial (heavy industrial uses, such as heavy manufacturing, refineries, and other labor and capital industrial activities) | ○ | ● | ○ | |||||||||||
| Employment centers (centers with major office and business uses, such as technology and research centers, corporate headquarters, and clean industry centers) | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ||||||||||
| Parks (open space recreational uses) | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ||
| Public and civic facilities (public and semi-public uses, such as fire stations, libraries, schools, community centers, and utility facilities) | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | ● |
The categories listed above are intended to be general in nature and not strictly applied to land uses in the Zoning Ordinance. A mix of land uses are allowed and encouraged in many LUTAs, assuming the uses proposed are permitted by the Land Use Typology Area and the Zoning Ordinance.
● Normally permitted ○ Requires location and compatibility standards
RURAL TO URBAN
⬚ figure
FIGURE 5: Rural to Urban Section - Cedar Rapids
RURAL <—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————> URBAN
Cedar Rapids is a community that transitions from a relatively high intensity typology (e.g. downtown) to a rural cross-section of exceptionally low-intensity. Thus when developing land use categories, the full range of Cedar Rapids' development must be addressed.
⬚ figure
LOW INTENSITY MIXED USES
HIGH INTENSITY MIXED USES
The Land Use Typology Areas are described on the following pages.
Table 3: Land Use Criteria and Descriptions
| LUTA | Use/Form/Intensity Characteristics | Location/Compatibility Characteristics | Service and Infrastructure Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural Preserve | Agriculture will remain the principal use during the planning period.<br><br>Very large minimum lot sizes.<br><br>Maximum residential density of 1 unit/40 acres. | Rural areas focusing on areas with prime farmland soil.<br><br>Minimal pressure or conflicts from residential or other uses. | Minimal infrastructure.<br><br>Extension of urban services will not occur during the foreseeable future. |
| Rural | Very large lot, single-family residential.<br><br>Maximum residential density of 1 unit/2 acres.<br><br>Open space buffers should be provided along arterials for development at higher densities. | Rural areas where more intense development is not planned.<br><br>Buffering or separation from pre-existing agriculture or agricultural industries. | Extension of urban services is unlikely during the foreseeable future.<br><br>Community water/wastewater systems in rural cluster developments. |
| Urban-Large Lot | Very large lot, single-family residential.<br><br>Maximum residential density of 6 units/acre. | Areas within the city limits that, due to steep terrain or other environmental factors, cannot be developed to typical urban residential densities.<br><br>Due to large lot sizes and limited uses, incompatibilities are minimized. | Full urban services.<br><br>Low densities make provision of urban services and infrastructure less cost effective than in typical urban residential areas. |
| Urban-Low Intensity | Single-family, two family, and multi-family residential with densities between 2 and 12 units/acre allowed.<br><br>Potential lot clustering.<br><br>Innovative subdivisions or site configurations encouraged through planned unit developments.<br><br>Commercial development clusters may be integrated into mixed use projects with commercial/residential uses.<br><br>Commercial uses should have frontage along streets, with limited direct surface parking exposure along right of ways. Pad sites may be used to shield parking lots. Cohesive sign design, with consistency of materials, lighting, and height. | Areas should be buffered from uses with adverse environmental effects, including noise, odors, air and light pollution, and heavy traffic.<br><br>Compatibility may be achieved with density and land use transitions, from lower to higher densities.<br><br>Locate new commercial facilities on commercial nodes, typically at median breaks or intersections of collector and/or arterial streets.<br><br>Neighborhood nodes should restrict commercial uses to one or two quadrants of intersections.<br><br>Locations may vary as part of a planned unit development. | Full urban services.<br><br>Framework of interconnected streets and sidewalks and trails.<br><br>Commercial uses should have direct access to collector or arterial streets. Shared access with other projects is encouraged to minimize curb cuts.<br><br>When applicable, internal auto and pedestrian circulation systems should be provided.<br><br>Direct pedestrian access from transit stops, public sidewalks and paths to business entrances.<br><br>Transit and bicycle access is advisable.<br><br>Convenient local access to surrounding neighborhoods with design that discourages external traffic. |
Table 3: Land Use Criteria and Descriptions
| LUTA | Use/Form/Intensity Characteristics | Location/Compatibility Characteristics | Service and Infrastructure Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urban-Medium Intensity | Single-family, two-family, and multi-family residential with densities between 6 and 24 units/acre allowed. Potential lot clustering. Innovative subdivisions or site configurations encouraged through planned unit developments. May incorporate community commercial scale clusters of developments. Commercial uses should be integrated wherever possible into mixed use development with residential uses. Frontage along streets, with limited direct surface parking exposure along right of way lines. Cohesive sign design, with consistency of materials, lighting, and height. In areas with access to transit, direct pedestrian access from transit stop to business entrances is encouraged. Commercial and mixed use development should include public or assembly space, typically in a plaza or urban sidewalk configuration with user amenities. | Reasonable access or location on collector or arterial streets. Convenient access to neighborhood commercial services. Buffering from or mitigation of adverse environmental effects, including noise, odors, air and light pollution, and heavy traffic. Compatibility may be achieved with density and land use transitions. Locate new commercial facilities in commercial nodes, typically at median breaks or intersections of collector and/or arterial streets. Neighborhood nodes should restrict commercial uses to one or two quadrants of intersections. Locations may vary as part of a planned unit development. | Full urban services. Framework of interconnected streets and sidewalks or paths. Transit and bicycle access is advisable. May include internal or alley access. Commercial uses should have direct access to collector or arterial streets. Shared access with other projects is encouraged to minimize curb cuts. When applicable, internal auto and pedestrian circulations systems. Direct pedestrian access from public sidewalks and paths to major pedestrian ways within projects. Transit and bicycle access. Convenient local access to surrounding neighborhoods with design that discourages external traffic. |
| Urban-High Intensity | Single-family, two-family, and multi-family residential with densities between 8 and 40 units/acre allowed. Innovative site configurations encouraged through planned unit developments. May be a component of mixed use projects, or include secondary retail and office uses. See Community Commercial in Urban-Median Intensity. | Adjacency to collector or arterial streets. Convenient access or integration into neighborhood and/or community commercial services. Buffering from or mitigation of adverse environmental effects, including noise, odors, air and light pollution, and heavy traffic. Compatibility may be achieved with density and land use transitions. | Full urban services. Framework of interconnected streets and sidewalks or paths. Transit and bicycle access. May include internal streets and connections to mixed uses. |
Table 3: Land Use Criteria and Descriptions
| LUTA | Use/Form/Intensity Characteristics | Location/Compatibility Characteristics | Service and Infrastructure Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Downtown | Unique regional commercial, employment, cultural and governmental center. Land uses reflect the most mixed use district in the city.<br><br>Multi-family residential with a minimum density of 20 units/acre.<br><br>Building intensity is the greatest in the city, with a minimum FAR of 1.0 required.<br><br>Variety of building types. Placement characterized by zero or minimal front yard setbacks.<br><br>Parking frequently provided off-site in public parking facilities. | Historic location of downtown along the Cedar River. As the most intensely developed area, land use intensity drops off with distance from the center.<br><br>Defining the limits of Downtwon is difficult and subject to change over time. Downtown-proper is bordered by area with less intense downtown support services and public institutions.<br><br>Transitions to area where off-street parking is a building requirement must be defined. | Full urban services.<br><br>Focal point for transportation network and area of largest infrastructure needs due to density of development. |
| Commercial | Unique retail and/or entertainment destinations serving metropolitan areas and surrounding region, as well as medium to high intensity offices and low-impact business parks.<br><br>Variety of building configurations.<br><br>Retail centers should be integrated into large-scale mixed use development with high-intensity office and residential uses.<br><br>Cohesive sign design, with consistency of materials, lighting, and height.<br><br>Access to transit is a high priority, direct pedestrian access from transit stop to major center entrances is required, where feasible.<br><br>Developments should include significant public or assembly space. | For new facilities, location at regional highway interchanges or at arterial intersections with superior regional access.<br><br>Location at major intersections and transit stops is highly desirable.<br><br>Locations may vary as part of a planned unit development. | Full urban services.<br><br>Superior arterial and highway access. Internal auto, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation system.<br><br>Direct pedestrian access from public sidewalks and paths to major pedestrian ways within project.<br><br>Local and regional transit service.<br><br>Shared access with other projects is encouraged to minimize curb cuts. |
Table 3: Land Use Criteria and Descriptions
| LUTA | Use/Form/Intensity Characteristics | Location/Compatibility Characteristics | Service and Infrastructure Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial | Broad range of industrial uses allowed. May include warehousing and distribution, manufacturing, and office/flex buildings. <br><br> May include limited supporting retail and commercial uses for the primary purpose of serving employee and business needs. <br><br> Landscaping and screening at perimeter and along street exposures. <br><br> Screening of high impact site components. Special design controls to mitigate visual and operational impact. | Convenient access to major arterials, highways, and other transportation facilities, as needed. <br><br> Locations with limited visibility along major civic corridors. <br><br> Locations that are distant from or do not affect incompatible uses, such as residential and major commercial. | Full urban services with adequate availability of water and sewer to serve needs. <br><br> Excellent access to transportation facilities without encroaching on lower-intensity uses, particularly residential. <br><br> Transit service is desirable. May take the form of special services or transit "brokerages." |
| Employment Reserve | Areas most suitable for large-scale industrial and business development. <br><br> Desire retention of large land parcels to accommodate major employers. <br><br> New uses to be employment or employment related, such as manufacturing, office, distribution, warehousing, technology and research centers. <br><br> Only commercial uses that support employment base allowed. | Good freeway and rail access. Access to airport. <br><br> Availability of water and sewer infrastructure. <br><br> Proximity to other employment centers and accessibility from residential areas for employees. <br><br> Compatibility with adjacent land uses. Need for appropriate buffering and screening from residential areas. <br><br> Not located within sensitive environmental areas, especially flood-prone areas. | Depending on nature of business, may have extraordinary water and sewer discharge/treatment needs. <br><br> Employee and truck service traffic require extensive street and highway infrastructure. <br><br> High-speed internet infrastructure needed for most new employment uses. |
| Public, Semi-Public | Uses range from colleges, campuses, cemeteries, and large public institutions. <br><br> Intended for areas where the form and function of public and semi-public uses varies from the surrounding LUTAs. Examples include multi-building campuses, cemeteries, and other large planned areas. Public uses are permitted in any LUTA without map amendment, provided that they generally conform to the design requirements of the underlying LUTA. | Individual review of proposals requires an assessment of operating characteristics, project design, and traffic management. <br><br> Commonly allowed in areas zoned for residential or commercial. | Typically requires full public services. |
Table 3: Land Use Criteria and Descriptions
| LUTA | Use/Form/Intensity Characteristics | Location/Compatibility Characteristics | Service and Infrastructure Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Space | Areas intended to provide open space recreational uses, such as local and regional parks and for the preservation of environmentally sensitive areas. Uses include parks and undevelopable areas due to accessibility or extreme slopes. | Parks should be centrally located with easy access for both pedestrian and auto users.<br><br>Ideally, residents should be within approximately a half a mile of a park facility.<br><br>All parks should be connected through the city's trail and greenway systems. | Minimal impact on public infrastructure. Parks and policing services impacted. |
| Urban Reserve Overlay | Areas established in the plan as the long-term growth areas for Cedar Rapids.<br><br>Goal is to keep rural residential development out of area to minimize conflicts with ultimate provision of city infrastructure and urban-scale development.<br><br>Typically require residential development to have minimum 10 acre lot size to discourage development. | Consider watershed boundaries and natural drainage patterns for provision of sanitary sewer service.<br><br>Other locational factors include natural features and pre-existing development.<br><br>Existing municipal boundaries and competition for growth areas can be factors. | Requires inventory and capacity analysis of public infrastructure and service needs of growth area.<br><br>Should conduct a cost/benefit analysis prior to establishment of future growth area. |
| Environmental Conservation Overlay | Environmentally sensitive areas that should be protected from development.<br><br>Includes wetlands, prairies, floodplains, drainage channels and scenic corridors. | Should follow environmental features.<br><br>Should be pre-designated in development areas.<br><br>Can be incorporated into the city's trail system when appropriate. | Natural and improved drainage systems require periodic maintenance. |
| Flood Control Study Area | Land which may be impacted by the future Flood Control System.<br><br>Uses should be limited to existing land use or open space until the Flood Control System alignment is finalized. Development or establishment of new uses should not be permitted unless it is determined that they will have no impact on the Future Flood Control System.<br><br>Temporary LUTA designation which should be amended once final decisions are made on Flood Control System alignment. | Land near the Cedar River. | Flood protection strategies required and may need periodic maintenance. |
MAP 1: Future Land Use Map
⬚ figure
Due to the dynamic nature of the Future Land Use Map, all instances of this map shown in this document are intended to be representative. The official Future Land Use Map shall be maintained by the city and made available online or upon request.
Map available online. Visit: http://crgis.cedar-rapids.org/FLUM/index.html
||||| Environmental Conservation --- Urban Reserve --- Cedar Rapids Boundaries
LAND USE TYPOLOGY AREAS (LUTA)
⬚ figure
FIGURE 6: Urban-Low Intensity
⬚ figure
The intent of this LUTA is to create smarter (more efficient, dense, walkable, bikeable) new suburban style development and encourage retrofitting of existing suburban style development to a more efficient, walkable pattern. As compared to denser LUTAs, Urban Low Intensity areas should offer more space and separation of uses in exchange for greater distances to destinations, fewer shared amenities, and less immediate access to jobs and cultural amenities.
Suburban style development. At the lowest density, areas should be just dense enough to warrant urban utilities and urban levels of service. At the highest density, areas should be only dense enough to support minimal transit.
Compatibility in these areas will be achieved through gradual increases of intensity, transitioning from one land use to another. For example, a cross-section of this area may show large lot single family next to medium lot single family, next to townhomes, next to apartments, next to commercial. Although the focus is on gradual changes in intensity, these changes should occur at a small enough scale to ensure integration of land uses within an area roughly a quarter section in size in order to encourage walking, biking, and the reduction of auto trips.
These areas should have full urban services, including a framework of interconnected streets, sidewalks, and trails. Commercial uses should have direct access to collector or arterial streets. Shared access with other projects is encouraged to minimize curb cuts. When applicable, internal auto and pedestrian circulation systems should be provided.
Infrastructure should also include direct pedestrian access from transit stops, public sidewalks, and paths to business entrances. Transit and bicycle access is advisable. Connectivity should be provided for convenient local access to surrounding neighborhoods with design that discourages external traffic.
LAND USE TYPOLOGY AREAS (LUTA)
⬚ figure
FIGURE 7: Urban-Medium Intensity
⬚ figure
The intent of this LUTA is to create vibrant, urban areas that draw customers and employees from outside the immediate area. A greater degree of space and cost saving should be attained through increased FARs. Increased density improves opportunities for economic activity and social interaction and acts as an incentive to redevelop aging buildings and develop vacant lots.
Includes multi-story residential and commercial uses.
Land uses and intensities should be integrated at a finer grain than within the Urban Low Intensity designation. As compared to U-LI areas, compatibility should be achieved through increased attention to traffic circulation and parking, site and building design, and on-site operations.
These areas should have full urban services, including a framework of interconnected streets and sidewalks or paths. Commercial uses should have direct access to collector or arterial streets. Shared access with other projects is encouraged to minimize curb cuts. When applicable, internal auto and pedestrian circulation systems should be provided. Internal or alley access may also be provided.
Direct pedestrian access from public sidewalks and paths to major pedestrian ways within projects should be provided. Transit and bicycle access is strongly encouraged. Connectivity should be provided for convenient local access to surrounding neighborhoods with design that discourages external traffic.
LAND USE TYPOLOGY AREAS (LUTA)
⬚ figure
FIGURE 8: Urban - High Intensity
⬚ figure
Sub-regional and regional attractions with large office or medical buildings and high density residential living. High density improves economic performance and opportunities for social interaction, and acts as an incentive to redevelop or rehabilitate aging buildings and develop vacant lots.
Land uses and intensities should be fully integrated and mixed. As compared to U-MI areas, compatibility should be achieved through increased attention to traffic circulation and parking, site and building design, and on-site operations.
These areas should have full urban services, including a framework of interconnected streets and sidewalks or paths.
Transit and bicycle access is essential in these areas. Infrastructure in these areas may include internal streets and connections to mixed uses.
LAND USE TYPOLOGY AREAS (LUTA)
⬚ figure
FIGURE 9: Downtown
⬚ figure
As the most intense area in the city for commerce and tourism, downtown should exhibit high density and intensity. The economic health of downtown benefits from close proximity between businesses. Downtown should allow for residential opportunities at all price points from affordable to high-end.
High Density. Multiple land uses coexist horizontally and vertically in buildings.
Because land uses and intensities are fully integrated and mixed, allowance is made for less harmonious neighbors through increased attention to traffic circulation and parking, site and building design, and on-site operations.
These areas should have full urban services. Downtown areas should be the focal point for the transportation network. These are the areas of largest infrastructure needs due to the density of development.
LAND USE TYPOLOGY AREAS (LUTA)
The intent of this LUTA is to provide low density, residential neighborhoods with availability of urban services. Designation is intended for existing neighborhoods. Amendments to the Future Land Use Map to this LUTA is discouraged. Any proposed amendments would need to show confirmation of environmentally sensitive areas. Development would need to avoid any identified environmentally sensitive areas.
Areas are served by urban utilities and urban levels of service.
Compatibility in these areas will be achieved through gradual increases of intensity, transitioning from one land use to another. Different intensities of land use are positioned to create a smooth internal transition from lower to higher intensity uses.
These areas should have full urban services. However, the low densities of these areas make the provision of urban services and infrastructure less cost effective than in typical urban residential areas.
The intent of this LUTA is to preserve working agricultural ground or large estates long into the future.
⬚ figure
These areas should have minimal infrastructure. Extension of urban services will not occur in these areas in the foreseeable future.
LAND USE TYPOLOGY AREAS (LUTA)
The intent of this LUTA is to provide plentiful space for low density, rural residential neighborhoods to remain in perpetuity with no pressure to urbanize.
Extension of urban services is unlikely in these areas in the foreseeable future. Community water/wastewater systems should be used in rural cluster developments.
LAND USE TYPOLOGY AREAS (LUTA)
This involves regional, community, and neighborhood scale areas where city investment, regulation, and policy is intended to enhance retail activity and performance, leading to stable neighborhoods and revenues. Special areas are reserved for their geographic positioning within markets and their appropriateness for retail uses. While other uses such as office and services may be allowed, the predominant uses should be retail in order to maximize effectiveness of city investment and policies.
The focus is on compatibility with development outside the commercial areas, as development within should all be similar in nature.
Commercial areas should have full urban services with superior arterial and highway access, along with good internal auto, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation. Local and regional transit service should be available. Direct pedestrian access from public sidewalks to major pedestrian ways within projects should be provided. Shared vehicular access with other projects is encouraged to minimize curb cuts.
The industrial designation allows for a broad range of industrial uses from small to large employers. Typical land uses range from outdoor storage to large indoor manufacturing and warehousing facilities.
Industrial areas are intended to house all types of industrial uses including manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, and office/industrial flex space. Limited retail and services are allowed, such as a gas station. Uses in this area can be smaller in size than in the Employment Reserve (ER) areas and aesthetic and other standards are less stringent.
Consider the following criteria when making decisions regarding industrial uses:
⬚ figure
ensure compatibility between employment uses inside and outside the area. Design standards should include land buffers, architectural and site design standards, and other appropriate standards implemented through Planned Unit Development (PUD) or new codes or guidelines. Operational standards should consider traffic, noise, lighting, and air quality.
These areas should have full urban services with adequate availability of water and sewer to serve needs of industrial uses. Excellent access to transportation facilities is also important in these areas. However, transportation access should not encroach on lower-intensity uses, particularly residential areas. Transit service is desirable in industrial areas, which may take the form of special services or transit "brokerages."
Development abutting an industrial boundary should be held to higher design and operational standards to
LAND USE TYPOLOGY AREAS (LUTA)
Employment Reserve areas contain sites that are the most suitable for large industrial and business development in the city. Protection of these areas is essential for Cedar Rapids' economic stability and future growth. The Employment Reserve designation provides a competitive advantage for attracting new companies and retaining companies that need to expand. Large acreages should be maintained to maximize clustering for specialization, synergy, transportation efficiency, and knowledge exchange.
Employment Reserve areas are prime areas for manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, office, and office/industrial flex space uses. ER areas require a higher standard for industrial infrastructure, urban design, access, and other factors. Non-industrial and non-office uses should be limited to support services for the primary employment generators. This may include limited commercial development. Fragmentation of Employment Reserve areas by small-scale development or incompatible uses is strongly discouraged.
Ensure the bulk of land within Employment Reserve areas is used for manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, office, and other industrial uses that generate substantial employment.
Allow small-scale industrial or office uses that support and strengthen major employment generators provided these do not impair the viability of future industrial or office development within Employment Reserve areas by fragmenting viable parcels or impeding internal circulation or exterior connectivity.
Allow commercial and other uses within Employment Reserve areas only as needed to support the primary purpose of the Employment Reserve designation and only in locations that do not fragment or otherwise limit capacity for industrial and office development.
Support transportation and utilities infrastructure improvements, both within and outside ER areas, that increase the viability of these areas for industrial and office uses.
Transportation infrastructure improvements should provide for efficient street layouts and enhance connectivity and capacity.
Subdivisions that result in inefficient street layout, poor parcel configuration, or otherwise limit future development in ER areas should not be approved.
A perpetual inventory of development-ready land should be maintained. (Development-ready land has all necessary infrastructure in place, or has the ability to achieve that state in short order.)
As Employment Reserve Areas develop, analyze the need for new industrial and employment reserve land. Employment Reserve Area lands that are developed may also need to be re-categorized accordingly.
Consider the following criteria when appropriating new ER lands:
Do not allow uses that are incompatible with large-scale industrial or office development to locate within Employment Reserve areas. Such uses include, but are not limited to, residential and schools.
Ensure development adjacent to Employment Reserve areas is compatible with and will not compromise viability of employment lands. Uses considered incompatible inside the Employment Reserve area may be appropriate adjacent to the area if compatibility can be demonstrated through special development controls in a Planned Unit Development.
Apply special design controls to Employment Reserve areas. These controls could at first be implemented through Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) or design guidelines. Encourage industrial park design which includes sensitive design and placement of buildings, screening or prohibiting outdoor storage, parcel sizes which allow for long term expansion for individual users, special landscaping requirements, and buffering treatments for truck access and loading facilities. Design standards should mitigate negative aesthetic, traffic, and other impacts.
The creation of a new zoning classification should be
LAND USE TYPOLOGY AREAS (LUTA)
considered to assist in obtaining the type and quality of development desired for this area.
Development abutting an ER boundary, whether inside or outside the boundary, should be held to higher design standards to ensure compatibility between employment uses inside the ER area and possible residential uses outside the area. Such design standards should include land buffers, architectural and site design standards, and other appropriate standards implemented through PUDs or new codes or guidelines.
In cases where infrastructure (e.g. sewer, transportation) has been installed with the express purpose of providing necessary capacity to Employment Reserve areas, any proposed rezone or subdivision outside of the Employment Reserve area must not impact the necessary capacity of the Employment Reserve.
Depending on the nature of businesses in Employment Reserve areas, there may be extraordinary water and sewer discharge and treatment needs. Employee and truck service traffic requires extensive street and highway infrastructure. High-speed internet infrastructure is also needed for most new employment uses.
The intent of this LUTA is to provide space for educational, institutional and assembly, and other public uses, including hospitals, major campuses (high school, college, and university), cemeteries, airport, landfills, water plant, and major utilities.
Educational. Educational uses are public, private, and parochial institutions at high school, or post-secondary level, or trade or business schools, that provide educational instruction to students.
Institutional and Assembly Uses. Institutional and Assembly Uses generally include community facilities, cultural facilities, cemeteries and places where large groups of people assemble for a common activity.
Other Public Uses. Other Public Uses include major public facilities, such as landfills, water treatment facilities, major utilities, or other large public campuses.
Public/Semi-Public areas typically require full public services.
Open spaces are important areas intended to provide open space recreational uses, such as regional and local parks and for the preservation of environmentally sensitive areas.
Development is recreational and low impact in nature, while complementary to the purpose of the wider area as open natural space.
These areas are valuable for their natural character, so uses within them should have as close to zero impact on the area as possible. This requires minimal visual, auditory, and other pollutants that would reduce the pristine character of the areas. Aids for compatibility may include:
Open Spaces areas should have minimal impact on public infrastructure. However, Parks and Police services are impacted.
LAND USE TYPOLOGY AREAS (LUTA)
The intent of this overlay is to preserve working agricultural ground or large estates until urbanization occurs. UR areas are adjacent to existing urban areas and will eventually be urbanized. UR designation helps prevent premature extension of infrastructure resulting in additional, unnecessary maintenance costs and parcelization, which encourages “leapfrog” development and makes orderly and efficient growth difficult.
In this LUTA, the goal is to minimize the conflict between agricultural operations and new development of any kind, including residential.
Urban Reserve Overlay areas require inventory and capacity analysis of public infrastructure and service needs required for the growth area. Prior to establishment of a future growth area, a cost/benefit analysis should be conducted.
This overlay is intended for areas of special environmental importance or sensitivity where basic land use policies are amended in consideration of the area's environmental significance. The EC overlays other LUTAs on the Future Land Use Map. EC policies are intended to be combined with other LUTAs. For example, if an EC area overlays a U-LI area, policies from both designations apply. The EC areas are designated for the following attributes, yet require additional study.
Development may be of the same general uses, and form as allowable in the underlying LUTA; however, measures should be taken to ensure development is low-impact in nature. Such measures may include:
The key consideration in these areas is minimizing the impact of development on the natural environment and seeking to integrate development into the natural environment in a symbiotic way. Development should preserve and enhance views, both from development and from streets and riparian corridors or other natural amenities.
In Environmental Conservation Overlay areas, natural and improved drainage systems will require periodic maintenance.
These areas of the community are currently under study for planned flood control projects.
Development should be limited in nature prior to adoption of the Flood Control Project by the City Council, at which point the future land use map should be updated to reflect anticipated future development. Open space and maintenance of existing structures should be a priority while this LUTA is used.
Any development within this area should carefully consider any impacts to future flood control. Development should ensure:
In these areas, flood protection strategies are required and may need periodic maintenance.
⬚ figure
| ■ | Flood Control Study Area |
| ■ | Floodway |
| ■ | 100-Year Flood Zone |
| ■ | 500-Year Flood Zone |
Cedar Rapids, like most cities, used a Euclidean (use-based) zoning ordinance for most of its history with districts dominated by a single major use classification (agricultural, residential, office, commercial, and industrial). While traditional Euclidean zoning (named after a landmark Supreme Court decision that sustained use-based zoning) addresses the primary purpose of separating incompatible uses, it has significant shortcomings, including its relative inflexibility, tendency to encourage decentralized development, and inability to accommodate mixed use urban development. These problems have led planners to propose alternatives such as performance zoning, “smart codes” that regulate building form, incentive zoning, and other techniques. In one way or another, each of these regulates how development is designed over the use of the development.
Since the adoption of EnvisionCR in 2015, the City has been working to update its zoning code to address these issues and better implement the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
During the EnvisionCR comprehensive planning process in 2015, the future land use approach shifted toward a model that makes greater use of intensity categories. The philosophical bases of this approach are that:
Intensity (or density) of a development type is more influential in measuring impact on the land and potential compatibility than the specific land use. This concept replaces the traditional hierarchy of uses (agricultural, residential, office, and commercial in ascending order) with other measurements, such as residential density (typically measured by dwelling units per acre), floor area ratio (ratio of building area to site area), and traffic generation (measured by trips generated per day).
It is impossible for a future land use map to anticipate a specific property's use. Attempting to do so leads to so many comprehensive plan amendments that the overall point of the plan is lost in the clutter and the document itself becomes irrelevant.
The growing preference for walkable and bikeable projects and neighborhoods, clearly manifest in Cedar Rapids, leads to development proposals that mix uses together. This mixing of uses, if managed carefully, leads to more desirable projects and major efficiencies, including complementary use of parking and reduced dependence on automobiles.
In following these principles, the Cedar Rapids approach moved toward intensity-based categories, or LUTAs (see previous pages for discussion). These categories define ranges of intensity of urban development (for example, low, medium, and high). Each of these categories can incorporate a variety of uses, corresponding to a level of intensity measured by objective metrics (du/A, FAR, ADT, for example). Thus, a land use area designated Urban-Low Intensity may include residential uses with a density range of 1-4 units per acre and certain non-residential uses with similar impact (such as an FAR below .30 and/or traffic generation below 50 daily trips per acre of development).
⬚ figure
MAP 3: Future Land Use Map
The image to the left shows an excerpt of the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use Map defines the intended intensity for each part of the City.
To view the full Future Land Use Map, see http://crgis.cedar-rapids.org/FLUM/index.html
Following the 2015 adoption of Envision CR, the Cedar Rapids Future Land Use Map was updated using these LUTAs.
In November 2018, the City of Cedar Rapids adopted an updated zoning code intended to implement the goals of EnvisionCR. The new code shifts away from traditional Euclidean zoning by focusing on density and intensity of uses and by using Urban, Traditional, and Suburban character areas. The updated code is intended to provide greater flexibility for development, while ensuring that the scale and character of new development is compatible with existing districts and neighborhoods.
The Urban Districts use Form-Based Code, which places an emphasis on physical form, character, and intensity of development, with a secondary focus on land use, to maintain or create traditional urban design and preserve and enhance community character. In the Traditional and Suburban districts, Mixed Use districts replace the previous Commercial districts. This allows for more integration of compatible uses, while maintaining more traditional Euclidean zones for residential and industrial uses.
The updated zoning code was drafted based on the following guidelines from original EnvisionCR (2015):
Level One: Intensity Ranges. Districts are based on specified intensity ranges, established by the comprehensive plan. In order to comply with the comprehensive plan, a development proposal should fall within the range of intensities for its intensity district. While most districts would be intensity-based, some single-use districts (particularly for regional commercial and industrial uses) will continue to be necessary. These would be used for types of development where mixed uses are extremely unlikely or even inadvisable.
The updated zoning code includes Urban, Traditional, and Suburban Districts and defines compatibility between each zone district and LUTA. Intensity in each zone district is controlled by minimum and maximum residential densities and maximum lot coverage and footprint size for non-residential uses. Design standards ensure that the scale and design of development is appropriate for its context.
Level Two: Standards for Appropriate Location. While the intensity-based concept proposes mixed uses, it does not mean that every land use is appropriate everywhere. Commercial and industrial uses have particular needs for transportation, surrounding conditions, utilities, and visibility. Urban uses in general require adequate water, wastewater, and utility infrastructure that can meet their demands for service. These individual requirements apply even in mixed use environments. This makes specific criteria for location and design of individual uses especially important. Developers and builders will use these criteria as they select sites and design projects. Neighborhood residents will be reassured that potentially incompatible uses will be directed to appropriate sites. Approving agencies will use criteria to evaluate the quality of development proposals and their compliance with the comprehensive plan.
The updated zoning code used the Future Land Use Map and the previous zoning code to determine appropriate zone districts. For the most part, the updated zoning code
⬚ figure
converted previous zones to the nearest “matching” district in the new code. In some cases, the updated zoning code used the Future Land Use Map as a basis for altering zone districts in places where previous zoning was incompatible with the identified LUTA.
Level Three: Transitional Standards. Finally, when different types of uses are adjacent or close enough to each other to create potential conflicts, design standards to moderate the transition should be in place. For example, a commercial use may be appropriately located next to a residential use according to level one and two. Transitional standards will further govern how that use is developed to prevent or minimize impact on its neighbors. The comprehensive plan will establish the thresholds for applying transitional standards and recommendations for guidelines that should then be incorporated into the zoning ordinance.
The updated zoning code includes provisions on Neighborhood Manners that apply additional standards to intense urban form districts that are adjacent to lower intensity residential districts. These standards include additional screening, setbacks, and height step backs to prevent adverse impact on adjacent single-unit neighborhoods. In other more intense districts, landscaping and buffering requirements prevent impacts from higher intensity uses on neighboring lower intensity uses.
MAP 4: Current Zoning, 2024
The image to the left shows an excerpt of the updated zoning map. In Urban, form-based areas, zone districts are displayed in street right-of-ways and apply to each frontage of a site. Some sites may be located within more than one district; for example, a corner lot may have one frontage in the U-NG zone and the other in the U-VG zone.
In Suburban and Traditional areas, zone districts are shown covering the entire area.
To view the full zoning map, see http://crgis.cedar-rapids.org/APV/index.html
Development that occurs in existing urban areas, rather than at the urban fringe, is called infill. Infill development is a way of "recycling" land, since many infill lots were previously used for another purpose. Infill makes use of existing infrastructure, such as streets and sewer connections. Although there are often costs uniquely associated with infill, such as site clean-up, this type of development can be more economical overall, due to the lesser need for infrastructure extension. The City should concentrate on upgrading facilities in urban areas and prioritizing the use of existing capacity over construction of new facilities.
GrowCR provides a framework for increasing the diversity and density of land uses within the city. The new Future Land Use Map supports infill projects and provides greater flexibility to approaches for redevelopment.
Downtown Cedar Rapids. Downtown is the heart of the city. Downtown retains an intimate walkable scale, making it an attractive district that can form a cornerstone for additional central city development. Enhancements to its special features can strengthen its role as an attraction for both residents and visitors.
Commercial Clusters. Commercial clusters, such as Lindale Mall and Westdale have a high concentration of retail. Westdale Mall is being redeveloped into mixed use.
Commercial Corridors. Commercial corridors, such as 16th Avenue and 1st Avenue (among others), are oriented to automobiles. StrengthenCR establishes an initial program to stimulate further investment by the private market, while providing improved access and circulation.
Neighborhoods. Following the 2008 flood, many neighborhoods focused on revitalization efforts. StrengthenCR reinforces these planning initiatives.
⬚ figure
1. Develop a strategy to encourage small-scale infill development on vacant City-owned properties.
City is developing a viewer of City owned properties for the public to view and make inquiries about. Expected to launch in 2025.
⬚ figure
Although infill development is strongly encouraged in Cedar Rapids, there can be barriers to infill development. These should be considered early in the process of infill development or redevelopment.
Land Use Regulations. Land use regulations, such as zoning, can sometimes provide barriers for infill development. However, the updated zoning code is intended to mitigate this issue by allowing for Major Design Exceptions and Minor Design Adjustments. In some cases, infill development may require public hearings that may not be necessary for greenfield development.
Assembling Parcels. Some sites for potential infill are challenging in terms of site location, size, topography, or other physical constraints. Infill sites may also have existing structures in disrepair or be classified as brownfields. Assembling a site out of many parcels can be challenging when land is owned by multiple entities. Legal property issues such as liens and restrictions can also pose challenges to infill development.
Resident Opposition. When a public hearing is required for infill development, resident opposition to new development or redevelopment can present a challenge.
Infill development also has benefits, both to the developer and the community. Possible benefits are outlined in order to encourage smart growth development within infill areas.
Existing Infrastructure. Development and redevelopment within infill areas has the benefit of utilizing existing infrastructure. This reduces cost for the developer, as they will not need to extend infrastructure, such as roads, water, and sewer, into undeveloped areas.
Less conversion of open space. Infill development makes use of land in developed neighborhoods and reduces the need for development of agricultural areas or open space.
Transportation. Locating new development closer to existing schools, employers, retail, and other services reduces travel times and prevents congestion. Infill development can more easily be connected to public transportation, trails, and bike routes, which offer more options for residents or users.
⬚ figure
April 2018
⬚ figure
November 2018
The image above shows an infill home built in 2018 by Habitat for Humanity. This displays an example of how new development can fit into and enhance traditional neighborhoods and provide additional housing in developed areas.
Cedar Rapids is a growing community, projecting to increase by about 30,000 people by 2035.
As Cedar Rapids grows, so will the demands on city services, such as water, sewer, and stormwater. Although this growth will correspond with an increased tax base, funds are limited. Keeping growth and revenue in balance is essential to maintaining a high level of services in everything from libraries to fire response. The City wants to continue to provide the same high level of service as it grows. The building of new neighborhoods should not be at the cost of older neighborhoods.
Growth should occur first in areas that provide opportunities for infill and redevelopment. EnvisionCR recognizes that demand will emerge for development on the fringe of previously built areas, and proposes a strategic approach to manage that growth within a framework of growth areas.
The type of development experienced can have a tremendous impact on service costs. For example, lower density neighborhoods are typically more costly to serve than higher density areas, since households are spread out over larger areas—that means everything from garbage trucks to ambulances have more miles to cover.
In a similar way, location of development has a tremendous effect. Due to topography or geographic proximity, certain areas may be impractical to serve, while unconstrained areas have fewer challenges and cost less to serve. Map 4 summarizes the serviceability of sanitary sewer and water in potential growth areas. Maps 5 and 6 show the individual serviceability of sanitary sewer and water in potential growth areas. Map 7 shows the estimated drive time for the Cedar Rapids' Fire Department to serve the city.
⬚ figure
Additional study is required to fully understand serviceability. The evaluation on the following pages is a snapshot based on information from Public Works, Utilities, Police Department, and Fire Department. Each offered opinions on serviceability based on known conditions. Geographic areas were scored using the criteria on the next page.
The City must be strategic in infrastructure extension, encouraging development in areas that will be cost effective, and allowing continued high level of service.
The provision of city services, especially sewer and water, heavily influences where growth occurs. Service and infrastructure investments should be made in strategic areas. Strategic areas are those that meet three measures.
First, the city wishes to grow there, according to the comprehensive plan and other plans; second, it is efficient to grow there, and; third, the market can support growth in that area. Strategic growth areas can include revitalization areas and new development areas.
MAP 5: Aggregated Serviceability for Sanitary Sewer and Water.
⬚ figure
Excellent serviceability. The area can be adequately served for proposed land uses by existing infrastructure.
Good serviceability. The area can be adequately served for proposed land uses by existing infrastructure. Affordable upgrades required.
Serviceable. The area can be adequately served for proposed land uses. For example, extension to the system is required and typical for conventional development. This is a typical rating for conventional development.
Serviceable, but requires improvements. The city has planned or is planning improvements for this area. For example, the city knows that we need a lift station or water tower is needed.
Serviceable, but requires study. The city assumes the area can be serviceable through improvements. For example, the city believes that a lift station or water tower is needed
Unknown serviceability, requires study. The city has not planned for service to this area.
MAP 6: Sanitary Sewer Serviceability
⬚ figure
MAP 7: Water Serviceability
⬚ figure
MAP 8: Fire Response Time
⬚ figure
Estimated Drive Times
Police Station Fire Station Hospital
The growth area approach will help maintain vibrant character, ensure efficiency in infrastructure and services, provide logical connections that improve access and mobility, and encourage a mix of uses. Each area functions as a neighborhood - it provides a balance of development types and community services, and requires community investments and features that create desirable living environments. Growth Areas are connected to one another by collector streets and greenways. This approach to growth helps maintain and enhance overall community character by extending Cedar Rapids' distinctive pattern of neighborhoods.
Future potential attributes of the Growth Areas, also found in many of Cedar Rapids' existing neighborhoods, include:
Where growth occurs, it should be contiguous to existing development to make efficient use of transportation and utility infrastructure.
⬚ figure
Map 5 defines the potential Growth Areas, and each area is discussed in detail on the following pages. These growth areas are based on the criteria defined . Important considerations for each Potential Growth Area include:
West. Orienting development in response to the Highway 100 expansion, and incorporating the natural environment as an amenity.
Southwest. Dedicating land for industrial projects and establishing a network of streets for emerging neighborhoods.
South. Dedicating land for major employer and large parcel projects, while completing a network of projects that would relate to Kirkwood Boulevard, while setting the stage for future growth past the southern ridgeline, which necessitates improved infrastructure.
North. Dedicating land for residential development, accompanied by a continuous parkway that connects neighborhoods and parks.
EnvisionCR presents possible population yields for growth areas. The calculation is only an assumption, and can be later used to assist in future transportation modeling. The development concept designates more land uses beyond the life of the plan. Population is calculated by:
| Table 4: Demonstration for Population Yield | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-LL | U-LI | U-MI | U-HI | |
| Gross area (acres) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Net area (acres) | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Households per acre | 0.5-4 | 2-6 | 6-12 | 12-20 |
| Total Households | 40-320 | 160-480 | 480-960 | 960-1600 |
| Avg. Household Size | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| Total Population | 88-704 | 352-1,056 | 1056-2,112 | 2,112-3,520 |
Maps 9-12
Administrative Area Boundary Lines
||||| Environmental Conservation --- Urban Reserve --- Cedar Rapids Boundaries
Agriculture Park/Open Space Rural Urban Low Intensity Urban Large Lot Urban Medium Intensity Urban High Intensity Downtown Commercial Industrial Employement Reserve Public/Semi-Public Flood Control Study Area
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The West Area is one of the primary areas for growth in Cedar Rapids. The Highway 100 Corridor Management Plan provides more detail for the study area. Development in the area far exceeds the total demand for Cedar Rapids' 2035 land needs.
ConnectCR discusses strategies for an interconnected and multi-modal transportation system. Major transportation elements in the West Area include:
MAP 10: West Area
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The Southwest Area considers the land uses to complete the gaps between existing built areas and the City of Fairfax.
ConnectCR discusses strategies for an interconnected and multi-modal transportation system. Major transportation elements in the Southwest Area include:
MAP 11: Southwest Area
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
projected housing: ~5,524 - 12,838 projected population: ~12,153 - 28,244
The South Area is increasingly positioned for strong growth. This area is benefiting from major office development along Wright Brothers Boulevard and proximity to the airport, Prairie View Technology Park, and Kirkwood Community College.
Major transportation elements in the South Area include:
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The North Area is one of the primary areas for growth for Cedar Rapids. The Tuma Soccer Complex, located at the crossroads of C Avenue and County Home Road, is two miles north of Cedar Rapids' corporate limits. The development concept provides a concept for connecting the soccer complex into the city.
ConnectCR discusses strategies for an interconnected and multi-modal transportation system. Major transportation elements in the North Area include:
MAP 13: North Area
⬚ figure
For areas not identified as Growth Areas, there are a number of obstacles that would increase the cost of providing necessary infrastructure for new development. Some of these obstacles include difficulty in providing water or sanitary sewer service, challenging topography, or sensitive environmental features.
Growth in these areas is unlikely because of these additional costs. Growth should be directed instead to infill opportunities within City Limits or the Growth Areas, discussed above. Directing growth to areas with existing infrastructure is more efficient and ensures that new development has access to adequate city services.
Although development is not likely in these areas, it may still occur in some cases. When this happens, connectivity features should be a priority. ConnectCR discusses strategies for an interconnected and multi-modal transportation system. Major transportation elements to prioritize in these areas include multiple points of transportation access for all developments and connectivity with future roads to provide a network of streets.
No updates at this time.
The City completed a growth study that identifies the cost/benefit of serviceability and development of various growth areas. Completed in 2024.detailed studies for extending services to these growth areas.
Completed in 2023.
As Cedar Rapids grows, it should maintain a connected street network while providing options for moving about the city, including walking, biking, and using transit.
Cedar Rapids must maintain an effective transportation system to maintain good connections within and between neighborhoods, between neighborhoods and major activity centers, and for local and regional travel.
EnvisionCR reinforces Connections 2040 (Corridor MPO's Long-Range Transportation Plan), which specifically identifies connections between neighborhoods as a priority, stating:
Provide Accessibility to Existing and Future Development Areas: Providing a good transportation system to travel from home to work or shopping and a transportation system that provides good access to business are important for economic vitality. This transportation system can be responsive to land use growth patterns or provide a structural infrastructure element to promote target development areas, which are integrated with the land use system.
Elements of this Cedar Rapids transportation system are considered in more detail in ConnectCR, and summarized below:
Complete streets are street corridors designed to accommodate all types of transportation, including motor vehicles, bicycles, transit and pedestrian transportation. The "complete street" concept applies to both arterial and collector streets and should be integrated into the transportation network of the city, particularly in existing areas and in areas which are developing for the first time.
Establishing a vocabulary of streetscape elements that span older and developing neighborhoods can unify the neighborhoods. Connected sidewalks, landscaping patterns, banners, neighborhoods graphics, and lighting are all elements of subtly connecting neighborhoods to each other.
Travelers sometimes chooses routes based on the experience of the street. Pedestrian and bicyclists, who move at slower speeds and have a closer relationship with the street environment, tend to gravitate toward attractive and secure corridors.
The ReLeaf Cedar Rapids Plan, adopted in February 2022 and expected to take 10 years to implement, directs the establishment of a consistent tree canopy to shade all streets in the community. The Plan's planting schedule prioritizes corridors with greater pedestrian use and one of its outcomes is to create a cohesive urban forest comprised of diverse, native trees that are both more resilient as well as convey a sense of local character.
A pathway and greenway system knits neighborhoods together. A planned greenway system includes a network of trails, pathways, and green spaces that connect both existing and new neighborhoods, activity centers, and pathways along major streets. The city's street and pathway system provides some of the connecting tissue that assures that Cedar Rapids' neighborhoods are, in the end, components of a unified and diverse city.
Increased connectivity between existing and emerging neighborhoods strengthens the concept of a unified community made up of distinct parts.
Maintaining natural areas and open spaces between existing and new neighborhoods is relatively easy to accomplish in Cedar Rapids by preserving areas that are difficult to develop, such as hills, steep slopes, drainage ways, and floodplains.
Participants in EnvisionCR and other community leaders frequently cited a need to improve regional collaboration for communication and efficiency.
Cedar Rapids benefits from numerous regional organizations and initiatives already in operation, including Cedar Rapids Metro Economic Alliance, Iowa's Creative Corridor, ImpactCR, Leadership for Five Seasons, Diversity Focus, Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation (GCRCF), Iowa Cultural Corridor Alliance, and many more. All of these organizations and initiatives facilitate dialogue among various members of the community - living in or doing business in the area.
Iowa's Creative Corridor celebrates the region's culture and promotes the marketability of the region for business development. Through the leadership of the Economic Alliance, in association with Iowa City Area Development Group, the Iowa's Creative Corridor Project could expand to include a coordinated effort that effectively creates an umbrella initiative for all organizations that seek to improve the quality of life for the region.
Participants would organize themselves around the five principal capitals and be chaired by leaders in the region: financial, human, social, natural, and physical.
Adopting a common project to garner purpose and support will strengthen the communication and interaction among the various groups. Ultimately, chairs and co-chairs would become the central steering committee for the project and assist in coordinating sub-committees related to their capital.
• Financial Capital. Organizations and initiatives supporting the improvements of value. Possible organizations: Economic Alliance, banking and financial industry, and major employers.
• Human Capital. Organizations and initiatives supporting the improvements of people's health, knowledge, skills, motivation, and mental state. Possible organizations: college and universities, school districts and Grant Wood AEA, hospitals, health and human services organizations.
• Social Capital. Organizations and initiatives supporting stewardship of communication, relationships, and partnerships. Possible organizations: ImpactCR, Leadership for Five Seasons, Diversity Focus, GCRCF, and AARP.
• Natural Capital. Organizations and initiatives supporting the improvement of the natural environment. The health and quality of Natural Capital influences all other capitals. Possible organizations: Corridor Conservation Coalition, Linn County Conservation Board, Trees Forever, and Solid Waste Management.
• Physical (Manufactured) Capital. Organizations and initiatives producing goods and providing services. Possible organizations: Developers, major manufacturing, businesses that export goods.
Communication between levels of government and with the public is essential to providing efficient and effective service. Actions for consideration to enhance local and regional communication include:
• Host annual open house. For example: Leawood, Kansas provides an annual open house for the community to learn about projects happening in their city. Departments have booths for people to approach managers to discuss projects that are adopted or being developed.
• Continue participation and coordination with the Corridor MPO.
• Initiate monthly meeting for mayors or city administrators in the region to discuss issues facing their community and region.
The city should work with Linn County and nearby cities to assure consistent development standards for areas outside of Cedar Rapids' jurisdiction that are likely to be incorporated into the planning area during the next twenty years. Areas covered by annexation agreements are shown on Map 11. The following criteria should be used when evaluating annexation requests:
Continue to support regional planning efforts through coordination with school districts, other local jurisdictions, and the Corridor MPO.
Communication and collaboration among organizations for planning efforts ensures broader support and probable implementation.
Iowa's metropolitan regions have benefited tremendously by undertaking initiatives to improve dialogue between private and public sector organizations.
The purpose of the organizational effort is to enhance the region's marketability strength to compete with other metropolitan regions throughout the Midwest when attracting people and businesses to start or locate in Iowa.
Develop annexation guidelines that incorporates infrastructure and service issues and costs, geographic features, environmental and other land use constraints, and market needs. Current working group between Community Development, Public Works, Utilities, and Development Services to update annexation guidelines and Future Land Use Map to reflect these factors.
Update annexation agreements with adjacent communities. Updated agreements have been executed with the following communities: Marion, Hiawatha, Swisher and Palo. Agreements with Ely and Fairfax are in the process of being updated.
This page was intentionally left bland.
⬚ figure
Cedar Rapids is situated at the convergence of two distinct landforms: the Iowan Surface and the Southern Iowa Drift Plain, each shaped by ancient glacial activity and erosion. These geological foundations, along with the unique climatic conditions of the Midwest, have created an environment conducive to a diverse ecosystem. Over thousands of years, cycles of growth and decay under prairie vegetation have enriched the soil, facilitating the proliferation of vast stands of timber and expansive prairie stretches within the Cedar River valley.
The Cedar River runs through the heart of Cedar Rapids and provides the foundation for an interconnected network of natural and built environment. Community members celebrate the trails, streams, and parks that make Cedar Rapids unique. The natural resources that have shaped Cedar Rapids—supporting livelihoods, recreation, and cultural identity—also present challenges. Flooding and severe weather have underscored the need for resilience, prompting the community to prioritize preparedness and responsible stewardship of these vital resources.
On June 13, 2008, floodwaters crested to its highest level in Cedar Rapids history, reaching 31.12 feet and surpassing the 500-year floodplain. The previous record had been 20 feet. A total of 1,126 city blocks were flooded. The flood event cost several billion dollars in damages.
In 2020, a powerful derecho long-lived windstorm, swept through the region with wind gusts estimated to reach up to 140 miles per hour. Power poles and roofs were obliterated, many homes and buildings collapsed, and an estimated 65 percent of the City's tree canopy was destroyed. This powerful storm damaged every quadrant of the City and impacted all residents in some way.
Cedar Rapids has continued to prioritize its natural spaces and build resilience into park maintenance while improving the park experience for residents. When managed with sound natural resource practices, these parklands offer wide-ranging benefits:
Similarly, trails continue to elevate Iowa’s profile as a regional and national destination. Cedar Rapids’ investment in trail infrastructure positions the City as an emerging leader in cycling tourism, economic development, neighborhood connectivity, and active living—all of which contribute to public health and community vibrancy.
⬚ figure
A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water, such as a creek, stream, river or lake. Think “drainage area.” The water can flow by many means including over land, through drain tile, or via underground waterways. Due to Cedar Rapids’ flood history, an understanding of watersheds is considerably more common in this community than elsewhere.
Watersheds can be defined at various scales. Cedar Rapids is located primarily in the Cedar River Watershed, which spans over 7,485 square miles – roughly the size of New Jersey. The Cedar River Watershed, which is part of the Upper Mississippi River watershed, contains six distinct subbasins: the Upper Cedar, Middle Cedar, Lower Cedar, West Fork, Winnebago, and Shell Rock. Within these subbasins there are 224 distinct subwatersheds, which are smaller units within a watershed.
The 100-year floodplain indicates a 1% chance of flooding in any given year, while the 500-year floodplain indicates a 0.2% chance of flooding in any given year.
Since the destructive Flood of 2008, Cedar Rapids has rebuilt, ever mindful of the impacts of volatile river systems and floodplains. The community members of Cedar Rapids know all too well the importance of floodplains in terms of infrastructure protection, ecology, and water quality and quantity. The floodplain, when properly managed, can provide an important community asset. A minimal-development greenway approach can likely achieve important social, economic, and environmental goals. Cedar Rapids is already embarking on a strategy to establish a greenway corridor along the Cedar River, with
⬚ figure
the adoption of the Greenway Parks Plan in 2024. The Plan is a long-range project that integrates flood protection with community spaces.
Wetlands are defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as “areas where water covers the soil, or is present either at or near the surface of the soil all year or for varying periods of time during the year, including during the growing season.” Wetlands provide essential ecosystem services such as water filtration, flood mitigation, wildlife and pollinator habitat, and are very important for overall watershed health. Because wetlands are so important, they are a protected habitat class and activities that could affect wetlands are regulated by local, state, and federal governments. Wetland mapping and delineation is an important strategy to look at hydric (wet) soils and ecologically sensitive areas. In Iowa, over 95% of wetlands have been drained.
Most of the wetlands are adjacent to streams or within the floodplain, but a number of small-scale wetlands are scattered throughout the region. Wetlands are essential to the hydrologic ecosystem because of their water cleansing properties. The number of wetlands surfacing in the region indicates value in exploring the potential of a wetland mitigation bank to serve this region. When wetland mitigation occurs within the watershed of the original wetland, it is more effective at replicating the functions of the original wetland, assuming the mitigating wetland is well designed and managed.
Wetland restoration is a key priority of conservation efforts on both public and privately owned land. In the Cedar River Watershed, oxbow wetland restoration and nutrient removal wetlands are two key strategies for introducing more wetland habitat in the watershed.
MAP 2: Cedar River Watersheds and Wetlands
⬚ figure
— Iowa Border [ ] Cedar River Watershed [ ] Basins [ ] Subwatersheds [ ] Wetlands
Source: City of Cedar Rapids Community Development 2025
Iowa DNR, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA, NPS, USFWS
Cedar Rapids supports the use of green infrastructure to improve water quality and manage stormwater sustainably. When rain or snowmelt flows across hard surfaces, it carries pollutants directly into streams and rivers, contributing to degraded water quality and localized flooding. Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) slow, soak, and filter runoff before it reaches waterways. Infiltration-based practices are especially effective in sandier soils, found primarily around downtown and east of the Cedar River. Surface-based options, such as vegetated buffers and filter strips, also help remove pollutants and reduce runoff. To encourage wider adoption, the City allocates $25,000 annually for residential projects and $250,000 for commercial projects, offering a 50% reimbursement up to $2,000 for eligible residential improvements, with no cap for commercial properties. To date, 72 residential and 16 commercial green infrastructure projects have been completed, advancing communitywide stewardship and enhancing the city's stormwater resilience.
Qualifying projects include: · Rain gardens · Bioswales · Soil quality restoration · Permeable pavers
The City of Cedar Rapids is engaged in multiple partnerships with the goal of protecting source water, reducing flood risk, and improving overall watershed health. Our flagship program is the Cedar River Source Water Partnership (CRSWP), which aims to protect community source water supplies from nitrate contamination stemming from agricultural areas. The City of Cedar Rapids serves as the lead partner on this project, which was awarded $7 million through the USDA-NRCS Regional Conservation Partnership Project and an additional $8 million from Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship (IDALS). Since 2021, the CRSWP partners have implemented 342,970 acres of cover crops, 9 wetlands, and 93,000 acres of reduced tillage. Additional partners include the Iowa Soybean Association, The Nature Conservancy, the Iowa Ag Water Alliance, and ag retailers in the watershed such as Linn Coop, IAS, and Nexus.
The City of Cedar Rapids leads this project in partnership with the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship IDALS and six counties in the Middle Cedar Watershed. The goal of this project is to decrease nitrate loading to the Cedar River by installing bioreactors and saturated buffers on farmland. The project utilizes a streamlined approach for design and construction that increases the pace and scale of implementation in the Middle Cedar Watershed.
Achievements: Since 2023, 68 edge-of-field practices have been installed and another 44 are planned for construction in the next year.
In 2025 the City's Watershed Program was awarded a new $1.3 million grant from United States Environmental Protection Agency through their Farmer to Farmer grant program. Through this grant the City will work with partners and landowners to restore ecosystem services to the Middle Cedar Watershed, to reduce nutrient pollution and improve farmland sustainability. Activities will be carried out at two scales. At the individual farm scale, the project will work directly with farmer cooperators to install projects such as wetland restorations and other denitrification strategies.
At the watershed scale, project partners will develop a hydrologic model to identify additional opportunities for resilience projects such as river restoration, floodplain reconnection, and nutrient removal wetlands. The environmental benefits of the project will be documented and shared with communities in the watershed.
⬚ figure
Above: examples of projects completed in Cedar Rapids
⬚ figure
SOIL QUALITY RESTORATION: Tillage, aeration, and compost improve the health of soil lawns. Healthy soil absorbs a greater volume of runoff.
PERMEABLE PAVERS: Permeable pavers allow stormwater to seep through their joints and soak into the soil beneath instead of flowing directly to creeks and rivers.
LANDSCAPING FEATURES: Native vegetation soaks up runoff, absorbing nutrients and providing habitat for pollinators. Features like rain gardens, bioretention cells, and bioswales capture excessive runoff in ponds or send runoff to a storm sewer or surface water system.
MAP 3: Impaired Waterways
⬚ figure
The Iowa Department of Natural Resources publishes impaired stream data every two years. When looking at stream impairment, it is important to recognize impaired waterways can range from slight to severe. The impaired stream data focuses primarily on Category 5 impairments – those stream segments requiring a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). A TMDL is a study of how much pollution (i.e. 'load') a stream segment can withstand and still meet state water quality standards. The TMDL study provides a detailed look at that stream segment's impairment and often offers details that relate to potential corrective measures. Due to the number of impaired waters in Iowa, a significant time lapse often occurs between calling out the need for a TMDL and actually completing a TMDL study. At the comprehensive plan level, impaired stream segments reveal stream stretches that likely need buffers. When work on the impairment does occur, buffers will help that work reach its full potential.
The Cedar River Source Water Partnership (CRSWP) is a city-led urban-rural initiative focused on improving drinking water quality, reducing flood risk, and restoring wildlife habitat throughout the Cedar River Watershed. Funded with $19 million through the US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Regional Conservation Partnership Program, the effort brings together state agencies, conservation organizations, and farmers from 2022 to 2027. Conservation practices implemented through the partnership include cover crops, no-till farming, prairie strips, vegetative buffers, and wetlands.
More information can be found at: https://www.iaagwater.org/
— Cedar Rapids Boundary
— 2024 Impaired Waterways
ReLeaf Cedar Rapids is an ambitious urban reforestation plan launched in 2022 to restore the City’s tree canopy, which was devastated by the August 2020 derecho. The storm brought sustained winds for 45 minutes, with gusts reaching up to 140 mph, impacting every neighborhood and destroying an estimated 670,000 trees—approximately two-thirds of the City’s canopy.
The Plan was developed through a seven-month planning process that engaged more than 2,800 community members provided input through public workshops, online surveys, and clipboard interviews at neighborhood events.
The overwhelming message heard from residents was the importance of replanting a resilient canopy of native trees, with an emphasis on plant diversity and distinct neighborhood character. Long-term goals of the plan include advancing tree equity, mitigating climate change, creating volunteer opportunities, and increasing public education about the value of urban trees and the broader urban forest ecosystem.
The ReLeaf Cedar Rapids includes goals to replant all public streets in the City within a decade following a transparent, justifiable methodology that is applied consistently. During the planning process, more than 7,500 street segments were evaluated and scored based on eight factors:
· Pre-derecho tree canopy · Urban heat island effect · Population density · Social vulnerability · Tree loss from the derecho · Pedestrian infrastructure demand · Roadway classification · Available planting sites
This data-driven approach produced a numerical prioritization that guides City staff to sequence street tree plantings by year.
The ReLeaf Plan also provides detailed reforestation designs for 38 public parks and outlines guiding principles for restoring tree canopy across all parks citywide. Over its ten-year horizon, the plan calls for planting 34,200 new street trees and an additional 8,300 trees in parks to rebuild a healthier, more resilient urban forest for future generations. As of 2025, the community has planted 18,388 trees, meaning the ReLeaf effort is already more than halfway toward achieving its goal.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
INITIATIVES
The overlay identifies environmentally sensitive areas in need of protection, based on the environmental maps created for this plan. The overlay establishes protections for these areas.
Creation of a policy will include best practice research to identify methods suitable to Cedar Rapids’ environment.
This will require identifying goals, metrics, policy needs, and department leads. An educational component focused towards the community and city staff will also be developed.
The development of the iGreenCR Action Plan, the city's first municipal sustainability plan is underway
Completed in 2020
Activities needed to accomplish this include promoting success and experience both internally and externally, developing the iGreenCR Action Plan, and conducting outreach related to the implementation of the plan.
Completed in 2020
Build customer capacity to respond to drought conditions which may include a rebate program, educational campaign, water conservation, and future updates to the municipal code as part of the green building program.
Develop a strategy to replace removed ash trees in parks and public right-of-way.
The Emerald Ash Borer is an exotic beetle whose larvae feeds on the inner bark of ash trees, disrupting their ability to transport water and nutrients. Ash trees lose moisture internally very quickly and begin to fall apart soon after they die, creating public nuisance or hazard situation.
The City has been proactively preparing for the Emerald Ash Borer since 2009, with efforts to stop planning ash trees, diversify tree species, and inspect existing ash trees. The City is in the process of removing all parkway ash trees. The City has removed over 2000 of the original 7000 ash trees identified in the 2016 tree inventory.
As thousands of trees are removed from City property, it is important that new trees are planted to maintain our tree canopy. In addition to the ash removals, the City removes approximately 1,000 other trees per year and plants approximately 600 trees per year. A strategy should be developed to maintain and enhance the City's urban forest
Cedar Rapids is committed to building a connected, inclusive, and resilient system of parks, trails, riverfront amenities, and public art that enhances quality of life, attracts investment, and celebrates the identity of our community. Recent initiatives such as the adoption of the Trails and Bikeways Plan and the Community Gardens in Parks Plan, along with the upcoming update to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan reflect a unified approach to strengthening our recreational network. EnvisionCR supports the continued implementation of these plans, reinforcing a long-term vision for an active and accessible city. Today, Cedar Rapids proudly maintains three dog parks, with a fourth opening at Jones Park by summer 2026, along with six public pools and more than 100 parks offering a wide range of amenities and experiences for residents and visitors alike.
Through community engagement Cedar Rapids heard the community overwhelmingly support transforming the Cedar River into a vibrant destination for recreation, culture, and community life.
Engagement Plans & Activities:
The iconic 60-foot stainless steel monument will anchor a thoughtfully designed public space where landscaping, bicycling paths, seating areas, and accessible river overlooks blend seamlessly with levees, floodwalls, and pump stations. The result is a dynamic riverfront that not only protects Cedar Rapids from future floods, but also celebrates our identity, connects communities, and offers everyday enjoyment for residents and visitors alike.
In the Downtown Vision Plan May's Island is planned to become a welcoming civic gathering space with shade trees, seating, ADA-accessible features, and includes a new landmark sign. These improvements, supported by grants and partnerships, will make the island a centerpiece for events and public life. To ensure long-term success, the City will formalize a Riverfront Activation Partnership with local organizations and businesses to guide programming, funding, and future enhancements.
This Plan will bring three connected parks—Time Check Park, Riverfront Park, and Czech Village Park to life. These parks will provide recreation opportunities while supporting flood resilience. Recent updates to the plan incorporate progress on the Flood Control System and include exciting features like the LightLine Loop, water access points, active and passive recreation atop of levees and floodwalls.
In 2025 a new Trails and Bikeways Plan was adopted. Cedar Rapids is closing gaps between neighborhoods, downtown, and signature parks, while linking local routes to regional trails. These improvements will make it easier and safer for people of all ages and abilities to walk, bike, and roll throughout the City. Clear signage, intuitive park entrances, and wayfinding maps will help residents and visitors navigate the system with ease. The City in collaboration with surrounding communities is commiteed to creating a well-connected, safe, and community-driven trails and bikeways network, strengthening both local and regional active transportation systems.
A central role in activating public spaces is arts and culture. Beginning in 2026, a Rotating Sculpture Exhibit will bring five new artworks to the Czech Village area each year, creating a dynamic and ever-changing experience. These installations will enliven the space.
Residents have expressed strong interest in river activities, and the City is responding by planning new amenities such as car-top boat launches, fishing platforms, and safe wading areas. A proposed paddlers trail will offer staging areas and portage options, while whitewater features are being evaluated to improve safety and attract visitors. These investments will balance in-stream and riverside recreation, creating opportunities for both adventure and relaxation.
Through these efforts, Cedar Rapids will deliver a region-leading parks, recreation, and trails system that connects neighborhoods, activates the riverfront, and celebrates local culture.
⬚ figure
(Greenway Parks Plan – Time Check area concept rendering)
Legend
Completed & Underway Greenway Parks Projects:
108 envisioncr
As part of the City’s commitment to creating a more age-friendly and connected community, we’ve introduced the Block N’ Roll community block party trailer. This all-in-one mobile unit is stocked with everything you need to host a fun and successful neighborhood gathering — making it easier to connect with friends, family, and neighbors. The Block ‘N Roll is available to rent from April-October.
The trailer includes:
Each summer, the Rollin’ Recmobile brings recreational opportunities directly to Cedar Rapids neighborhoods. The mobile unit visits nearly 20 parks weekly, offering games, crafts, and activities for all ages. Parks and Recreation staff lead the programming, creating spaces for kids to play and connect close to home.
To support youth during the summer months, free lunches are available at all midday stops through a partnership with the school district’s summer meal program for children under 17. In addition to park visits, the Recmobile also appears at community events throughout the season, helping expand access to recreation across the city.
In January 2026, Cedar Rapids was recognized by the League of American Bicyclists as a Silver-Level Bicycle Friendly Community, an upgrade from its previous Bronze designation. This achievement reflects the City’s ongoing commitment to creating safe, accessible, and enjoyable biking opportunities for residents and visitors of all ages and abilities. The award acknowledges investments in bike infrastructure, education, and encouragement programs that promote cycling as both a healthy and sustainable mode of transportation.
⬚ figure
Key efforts contributing to this recognition include long-range planning and expansion of the trail and bikeway system, as well as community events like Bike to Work Week and Ride the Districts, which encourage active transportation and showcase the growing network of bike routes. With projects such as the Alliant Energy LightLine and continued enhancements to bike lanes and trails, Cedar Rapids is building a more connected city and fostering a culture that embraces cycling as an integral part of everyday life.
⬚ figure
MAP 4: Cedar Rapids Parks
⬚ figure
City Boundary Golf Courses Parks Pools Dog Parks Community Gardens
City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa DNR, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, USDA, USFWS
INITIATIVES
2018 City Council Priority
The current parks and recreation master plan was completed in April 2010. The plan should be updated every 15 years.
These plans are key to maintain these parks, and their unique identities, as destinations for the city and region.
These plans are key to maintaining these parks, and their unique identities as destination for the City and region.
Completed in 2023.
The city continues to look for opportunities to reduce its costs while providing a benefit to the natural environment.
Many cities require dedication of park land by developers, typically as a function of the number of acres or dwelling units in the development. Some cities allow developers to provide a payment for parks, in lieu of land dedication, but the legal precedent for this in Iowa is complex - cities should consult with their attorney on this issue.
The City is working with ConnectCR in a public-private partnership to revitalize Cedar Lake and build the Smokestack Bridge, a pedestrian/trail bridge over the Cedar River near the Czech Village and NewBo neighborhoods. The City has committed $5 million to the project, with ConnectCR conducting private fundraising to cover the remaining costs. The City will be responsible for the design and construction of both projects, and will take ownership, with Cedar Lake and the Smokestack Bridge becoming park of the City's park system. These projects will enhance connections in our parks and trails system and provide a variety of recreation options, including biking, kayaking, and fishing. Completed in 2024.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
(blank page)
Organizations across the world, in both the public and private sectors, are seeing the impacts of environmental degradation and climate change and preparing for the future. Here in Cedar Rapids, businesses, non-profits, and government agencies are working to strengthen resilience to climate-related disasters, integrate climate considerations into policies and planning, and build local knowledge and capacity. To understand why this work matters, it helps to distinguish between weather and climate. Weather reflects the short-term conditions of the atmosphere, while climate describes the long-term patterns our community expects. Those long-term patterns are changing and will continue to shift in the years ahead.
A warming planet is a major challenge for sustainability. Human activities that contribute to climate change are, by definition, not sustainable. To achieve sustainability, the City is making decisions that consider the Triple Bottom Line—balancing the environment (Planet), the economy (Profit), and the health and well-being of residents (People) environment, economy, and health and well-being of residents simultaneously. EnvisionCR reflects the public's desire for a sustainable city – one that will be vibrant, dynamic and stand the test of time.
The Cedar Rapids community knows the impact of severe weather events, which will increase in frequency and severity as our climate changes. The City is building a flood control system that will withstand the same water volume as the 2008 flood. When planning future growth, the City considers the impact of development on stormwater and urban heat. Additionally, Cedar Rapids is doing its part to innovate and reduce greenhouse gases while supporting economic growth. As communities, corporations, and nations continue to prioritize nature and the use of clean energy, our future improves.
⬚ figure
People (Social)
Planet (Environmental)
Profit (Economic)
Because the City cares about the future of it's residents, a Community Climate Action Plan (CCAP) was adopted on September 28, 2021. The plan fulfills the ambitious goals of City Council's Climate Resolution to reduce greenhouse gases, build resilience to climate hazards, and support access to basic needs for all residents. The plan prioritizes 24 actions within two key goal areas:
The City is committed to doing its part to limit global warming and avoid the worst effects of a changing climate. This will take a community effort, where every resident, business, and institution plays a role in reducing emissions and strengthening resilience to ensure everyone benefits from an improved quality of life. Working towards climate resilience is a momentous opportunity to shape our community into one where everyone has access to basic needs, healthy food, active living, and prosperity. Cedar Rapids will move forward together.
Higher Temperatures
Long-term winter temperatures have increased six times more than summer temperatures. Nighttime temperatures have increased more than daytime temperatures since 1970. Iowa's humidity has risen substantially, especially in summer, which now has 13% more atmospheric moisture than 1975 as indicated by a 3 degree to 5 degree F rise in dew-point temperature. This fuels convective thunderstorms that provide more summer precipitation.
Agricultural Challenges: Climate extremes, not averages, have the greater impact on crop and livestock productivity. Weather events can increased soil erosion and water runoff. A warmer climate provides favorable conditions for the survival and spread of many unwanted pests and pathogens.
Habitat Changes: Plants are leafing out and flowering sooner. Birds are arriving earlier in the spring. Particular animals are now being sighted farther north than in the past.
Public Health Effects: Increases in heart and lung problems from increasing air pollutants of ozone and fine particles enhanced by higher temperatures. Increases in infectious diseases transmitted by insects that require a warmer, wetter climate. An increased prevalence of asthma and allergies. Negative effects from heat waves, which disproportionately affect the elderly, children, and individuals with health conditions.
In 2019, Cedar Rapids launched its first micromobility program, partnering with Veo to bring shared scooters and bikes to the community. This initiative isn’t just about convenience—it’s about creating a healthier, more sustainable city. Micromobility options help reduce parking demand, traffic congestion, noise pollution, and harmful emissions. For many residents, this program is more than a choice it’s a lifeline. In fact, 39% of riders don’t own or have access to a car, and 75% say the program helped them reduce car travel, lowering environmental impact. To ensure accessibility for all, Veo offers 50% off rides for anyone enrolled in local, state, or federal assistance programs, making affordable transportation available to those who need it most. This program matters because it connects people to jobs, education, and daily needs while building a greener, more inclusive Cedar Rapids.
Cedar Rapids is investing in cleaner transportation with the purchase of two hybrid diesel-electric buses, funded by a Federal Transit Administration Low or No Emission Grant and a 15% required local match. These buses will reduce fuel consumption and emissions through features like regenerative braking, start/stop technology, and geofencing for electric-only in designated zones.
The buses will serve the City’s busiest routes to maximize environmental and economic benefits, aligning with Cedar Rapids’ Community Climate Action Plan goals of reducing greenhouse gases and improving resiliency. While the upfront cost is higher than traditional diesel models, increased fuel efficiency and long-term savings make this a strategic investment.
This marks the City’s first step toward transitioning its fleet to lower-emission vehicles, complementing other sustainability efforts such as EV charger installations and the purchase of low-emission sedans and light-duty vehicles. Future bus replacements will prioritize hybrid or cleaner technologies as funding and feasibility allow.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
CONNECTCR
⬚ figure
ConnectCR focuses on the interaction of transportation and land use and their influence on the quality of life in Cedar Rapids. In any community, the transportation system fills many functions - as a lifeline for business and industry and a tool for economic self-sufficiency, a form-giver to the city, and an amenity and vital service for residents.
Interestingly in the United States, it is mobility that dominates much of how people think about cities and towns. Outside of home and workplaces, much of city life is spent moving from one place to another, and the street has become the public space that citizens experience most. In our cities, we have become creatures of movement.
Transportation facilities, including sidewalks, trails, streets, Interstate 380, and railroad corridors, make up a significant amount of Cedar Rapids' developed area. The dominance of streets in the cityscape makes their design and scale especially important. As street widths fluctuate, their scale continues to change. The street width affects the nature of the experience and the visibility of people, signs, and buildings along the street.
Transportation arteries, including both the railroad and major roads, are also the corridors of commerce in Cedar Rapids and nearly every other community. They provide the access and visibility that retailers, service providers, and industry need to thrive. Therefore, urban corridors are closely tied to economic development, and improvements can stimulate the business environment.
In November 2021, the citizens of Cedar Rapids voted to extend collection of the 1% local option sales tax for another ten-year period from July 1, 2024 thru June 30, 2034. The program to fund streets through this revenue source is known as the Paving for Progress program that will provide approximately $26 million annually for maintenance, repair, construction and reconstruction of public streets. Projects are prioritized and selected based on the City's Pavement Management Plan. These streets are public spaces that accommodate a variety of users in an attractive and functionally efficient way. Many communities such as Cedar Rapids find that the aesthetic upgrading of key community corridors and entrances creates significant economic benefits by encouraging better development standards.
The city's transportation system should encourage all modes for appropriate trips – many short distances should not require automobile travel, for example. Nearly half of all trips are within three miles. Therefore, street standards should include reasonable accommodations for all users. The concept of "complete streets," multi-modal facilities that serve automobiles, bicycles, and pedestrians in an attractive public environment, should be integrated into the transportation, park, and pathway networks of the city.
Cedar Rapids' neighborhoods, activity centers, civic districts, and major open spaces should be linked by a balanced transportation network that integrates motor vehicles, pedestrians, bicycles, motorized wheelchairs, and other low-speed "personal mobility vehicles." An active transportation network (including pedestrian, bicycle, and public transportation) connected to land use and development, increases mobility and helps create a sustainable and healthy city. Residents also identified trails and bicycle infrastructure as a community priority.
From a development perspective, a system that encourages multi-modal transportation includes:
The success of pedestrian and bicycle transportation systems can be measured by four key criteria:
Directness. The system should provide relatively direct routes to destinations without taking people far out of their way.
Integrity. The system should connect to places and provide continuity, rather than leaving users in dead ends or uncomfortable places.
Safety. The system should be physically safe to its users and not present hazardous conditions.
Comfort. The system should understand the various capabilities and comfort levels of its users. For example, senior citizens may take a relatively long time to cross a street, and some bicyclists are not comfortable riding in mixed traffic.
Cedar Rapids should maintain a continuous pedestrian network to complement the street system. A multi-use trail and walkway system can complement automobile trips by providing a good environment for non-motorized transportation. Cedar Rapids has created a substantial bicycle system, in some cases oriented along street right-of-ways. A more comprehensive system can continue to enhance and expand these facilities, while adding a significant network of off-road (trails and sidepaths) facilities that relate to major destinations and development opportunities. The details of trail development of the system are described in GreenCR and the Cedar Rapids Comprehensive Trails Plan (2012). Generally, trails are preferred due to their separation from the road network and the inherent conflicts with automobiles. However, the proper use of sidepaths in conjunction with on-street facilities leads to a more comprehensive bicycle network that is more responsive to users of all abilities in addition to the benefits garnered by non-bicyclists using off-street facilities. Cedar Rapids currently has the following types of facilities:
FIGURE 1: Typical 3-lane section with sidepath and bicycle lane.
⬚ figure
Trails: provide exclusive paths separated from parallel streets.
On-street: paint is used to delineate specific locations for bicyclists such as bike lanes, Sharrows, and buffered bike lanes. Vehicle parking or other fixed objects can be used to create protected bike lanes.
Sidepaths: parallel streets and are a minimum of 10 feet wide.
Singletrack: mountain bike trails wide enough for one rider often located in parks.
Share-the-Road. “Share-the-road” designation should not relegate bicycles to specific routes. However, they do help direct bicyclists to certain routes and notify motorists that bicycles are likely to be in the area. Providing a complete wayfinding system will help direct users to destinations.
Sidewalks. Sidewalks are a critical, although frequently under-recognized, part of any city's transportation system. Pedestrian facilities are increasingly a public utility and resource for promoting public health. In addition to reducing walking along roadway crashes, sidewalks reduce other pedestrian crashes. Roadways without sidewalks are more than twice as likely to have pedestrian crashes as sites with sidewalks on both sides of the street. Providing walkways for pedestrians dramatically increases how well pedestrians perceive their needs are being met along roadways. The wider the separation between the pedestrian and the roadway is, the more comfortable the pedestrian facility. By providing facilities that are more comfortable, we can increase the number of trips made by walking, particularly in areas with mixed land uses. Research indicates that people will walk for recreational purposes if a facility is provided. Recreational walking is one of the easiest ways for people to get the recommended allotment of physical exercise each day. Moderate exercise, such as walking, contributes to both physical and mental well being.
Transit. Transit service is currently more often used by transit dependent or limited mobility customers – seniors, people with disabilities, and children. The potential market in Cedar Rapids is even larger when demand from students and choice transit users are considered.
Work towards implementing the transit system and policy recommendations from the 2016 Corridor MPO Transit Study. Continue to update the transit study as necessary. Map 2 shows the existing fixed-route transit system shows the existing fixed-route transit system.
MAP 1: Bicycle Network
⬚ figure
| Legend | |
|---|---|
| Cedar Rapids Trails and Bikeways | Neighboring Community Trails and Bikeways |
| — Existing Separated | — Existing Separated |
| — Existing Unseparated | — Existing Unseparated |
| -- Future Separated | -- Future Separated |
| -- Future Unseparated | -- Future Unseparated |
MAP 2: 2024 Fixed-Route Transit System
⬚ figure
INITIATIVES
The City is working with a consultant on the Linn County and Cedar Rapids Trails and Bikeways Plan. The Plan is expected to be adopted in 2025.
Cedar Rapids Boundary
As Cedar Rapids grows, it should maintain a connected street network, providing transportation options for movement around the City.
Cedar Rapids must also maintain an effective transportation framework to ensure good connections within and between neighborhoods, major activity centers, and for regional travel.
Within the framework of higher-order streets (arterials and collectors, local street systems will develop to serve individual developments. These systems should be designed with clear circulation patterns that preserve the quiet qualities of neighborhoods while providing access to residents, visitors, and public safety vehicles.
The following is a cursory review of Cedar Rapids transportation system that provides a base-level understanding of transportation needs that should continue to be evaluated annually.
The Center Point Road corridor is an example of a location characterized by comparatively high traffic volumes, an array of land uses ranging from low-density residential to large commercial businesses, an existing trail system, and closely spaced access locations. These factors create access management problems and prompt the need for systemic improvements in access management. Once completed, overall intersection safety will be enhanced and future congestion issues around Collins Road/IA Highway 100 will be mitigated.
When a neighborhood has only one access point, the lack of multiple roadway connections to the area can result in increased travel time, increased vehicle miles traveled, and potentially reduced public safety response as emergency vehicles do not have multiple route choices. In these cases some of the individual streets may need to be extended to provide an additional connection, while others are a group of streets that may need to be extended and connected.
The City of Cedar Rapids has re-timed corridors based on traffic counts collected in 2017. All corridors have been coordinated according to those volumes and we have begun our maintenance program of refining the coordination based on updated traffic volumes. ATSPM (Automated Traffic Signal Performance Measures) metrics are being used at existing signalized intersections with upgrades to detection in order to obtain new traffic volume data. This data is being used to re-time signals in Cedar Rapids and will be a very useful tool in maximizing efficiencies and identifying issues.
In certain cases, signal re-timing will not improve functionality of corridors due to capacity constraints. Some of these locations are being modified to increase capacity, which will reduce delay. These locations include Boyson Rd & I-380 interchange and Wright Brothers Blvd & I-380 interchange. These improvements allow for reductions in delay with existing traffic volumes as well as accommodate for an increasing traffic need due to development.
Future traffic congestion along roadway corridors is based on traffic volume forecasts for the year 2040. Roadway segments that will likely have congestion issues in the future include:
FIGURE 2: Connectivity Demonstration
⬚ figure
The diagram above shows the possible extension of streets that would create a network and provide circulation options for people living in the neighborhood. Also, the additional access improves serviceability for snow removal, trash collection, and emergency response. Providing a strong connected network of roads and pedestrian facilities can help distribute traffic, reduce travel distances and times, improve routing for transit and reduce walking distances. Good connectivity also provides better routing opportunities for emergency services and delivery (solid waste, recycling, mail) vehicles. All of these effects can play a positive role in reducing congestion on the street network. A well-connected transportation network can also facilitate walking and bicycling. Increased levels of connectivity are associated with higher levels of physical activity from transportation.
To take a big picture look at the walking environment and connectivity, the City developed a Pedestrian Master Plan with the vision of making walking in Cedar Rapids safe, convenient, accessible, and enjoyable for people of all ages and abilities by 2040. The Pedestrian Master Plan was adopted in 2019, and is being updated in 2025. The goal of the Plan is to develop an updated priority list where there's a need to install new sidewalks. Having a plan helps the City focus on areas of greatest need and establish priorities based on the community's feedback.
Cedar Rapids has a burgeoning trail network. A well connected pedestrian network is critical to increasing walking in Cedar Rapids. For nearly a decade, the City of Cedar Rapids as a community and an organization has placed a greater emphasis on walking. In 2010, the City adopted its first Sidewalk Master Plan. In 2014, the Sidewalk Master Plan was updated, and the City Council adopted Iowa's first Complete Streets Policy.
FIGURE 3: Sidewalk Connectivity
⬚ figure
The images above show how sidewalk improvements can provide increased pedestrian connectivity in areas where street connections are impractical or undesirable for the neighborhood. Sidewalk connections allow neighborhood residents to walk to nearby commercial uses, while avoiding potential traffic impacts.
Roadway corridors with frequent crashes are identified as having safety issues. Nearly all the corridors with reported safety issues are classified as arterial roadways. As such, these roadways carry a large proportion of traffic throughout the city and often at higher speeds. Several roadways identified are existing truck routes, so heavy vehicles are inter-mixed with automobile traffic. The combination of higher speeds, increased traffic volumes, and heavy truck movement factors into the safety concerns associated with these roadways.
The intersections identified as locations of frequent crashes as reported during the five-year timeframe, 2013 to 2017. Those intersections with identified concerns are generally located where two arterial roadways intersect. Intersecting arterial roadways have been found to generate a high volume of turning movements and an increased likelihood of vehicle conflicts. These intersections are primarily located along corridors with safety and future congestion issues including Collins Road NE and First Avenue NE.
| Corridor | Between |
|---|---|
| Blairs Ferry Road NE | I-380 & C Ave |
| Collins Road NE | I-380 & C Ave |
| 1st Avenue NE | L St & 3rd St |
| 1st Avenue W | 10th St NE & 7th Street SW |
| 16th Avenue E | 8th St & 16th St |
| Edgewood Rd SW | 16th Ave & 37th Ave |
SOURCE: IOWA DOT SAVER.
| Intersections |
|---|
| Center Pt Rd NE at Hwy 100 WB Off Ramp |
| Edgewood Rd SW at 37th Ave |
| Edgewood Rd SW at 16th Ave |
| 1st Ave W at L St |
| Blairs Ferry Rd NE at Council St |
| 16th Ave SW at Wiley Blvd |
| 1st Ave E at 8th St |
| Collins Rd NE at C Ave |
| Collins Rd NE at Council St |
| Blairs Ferry Rd NE at C Ave |
| Edgewood Rd SW at 33rd |
| 1st Ave E at Collins Rd |
SOURCE: IOWA DOT SAVER.
Staff conducts a majority of the traffic engineering studies for the majority of Paving for Progress and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects. Complex studies are typically contracted to consultants.
Staff answers approximately 900 public requests per year asking if changes in traffic control are warranted.
The City started a signal re-timing maintenance initiative. Using updated technology data is captured at signaled intersections. This data is vital in timing corridors based on updated traffic volumes. Staff have updated 95% of all signalized intersections using this data.
Pedestrian and bicycle needs are considered in the Capital Improvement Plan through feedback from residents, requests and the application of the Complete Streets Policy.
Streets make up one-of-the largest single category of public spaces in Cedar Rapids. Streets take up more land than all of the trails, schools, college campuses, public buildings and other facilities combined. For many residents, their primary contact with the outside public realm is on streets, as drivers and, to a lesser degree, as pedestrians and bicyclists. Streets are the real front doors to houses in neighborhoods, as well as paths to work. Streets as public spaces should be both efficient and attractive.
This concept of "complete streets" – streets that serve a variety of functions and potentials – should be applied to other principal corridors in Cedar Rapids. Complete streets may include all or some of the following features:
Complete streets will have different roles, ranging from neighborhood circulators and collectors to major arterials. As these streets are developed or upgraded, the design features that mark civic streets should be incorporated into their design.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Sign and mark streets for bicyclists per the Complete Streets Policy. The city should continue to mark and sign streets for bicycle use as it has in the downtown.
Retrofit high priority corridors with sidewalks and pedestrian amenities ensuring ADA compliance. The city should continue to implement its adopted Sidewalk Master Plan.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
Demonstration from Chicago, Illinois Top: Complete Street Left: Bike Lane Right: Sharrow
Cedar Rapids' streets should be designed as public spaces as well as conduits for travel.
Good streets have more than one purpose. In addition to moving people or goods, they are important public spaces and should be designed appropriately. The concept of streets as public spaces defines strategic streets as parkways that connect neighborhoods, parks, and activity centers while providing a strong and unified image for the community. These streets have special characteristics that serve to unify rather than divide neighborhoods, accommodate all forms of travel, and encourage adjacent development to be oriented toward the public right-of-way.
Cedar Rapids has demonstrated its awareness of the multiple purposes of streets with its increased investment across downtown, NewBo (3rd Street SE, and Czech Village (16th Avenue SW. Attractive landscaping, improved lighting, public art, and street furniture have made these districts a pleasure for people traveling through some of Cedar Rapids' most distinct and inviting public spaces.
Map 5 displays the City's existing federal functional classification system. Map 8 recommends additions to be considered during the eventual update of the regional Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The LRTP is called Connections 2040 and is developed and updated by the Corridor Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The Corridor MPO is a regional entity comprised of the metropolitan communities and performs regional transportation planning for the Cedar Rapids metropolitan area. The LRTP is a guide for the investment of federal transportation funds in the metro area and Cedar Rapids should make sure its most important projects are included in the plan.
Cedar Rapids' gateways are a visitor's first interaction with the community, and convey a powerful first impression to visitors. The City's front doors should welcome and invite visitors, making a dramatic statement about the quality and character of the community. Cedar Rapids' primary gateways include its interchanges with Interstate 380, Highway 30, Highway 100 (Collins Road), and Highway 151 (Williams Boulevard and 1st Avenue).
But entrances and corridors are also important to residents who use the City every day. Major corridors like 1st Avenue are important places of commercial and civic activity. Applying enhancements along this corridor would make it more attractive and demonstrate the significance of design improvements along major transportation routes. Attractive residential streets also add value to their surroundings and provide avenues on which people travel at slower speeds.
Corridor Action Plans examine issues and identify solutions related to connectivity, land use, character, streetscapes, and placemaking. These plans can be integrated into Neighborhood or Area Action Plans or be done as a stand-alone plan. Regardless, the City will develop these plans based on coordination with numerous City activities. For example, road improvement or utility projects offer an opportunity to address issues related to connectivity and streetscapes. Economic Development or housing development projects may address character and land use issues.
As discussed in StrengthenCR, candidate roadways for Corridor Action Plans are ones that provide key linkages or connections throughout the City. Corridors that emerged from the planning process as a priority for improvement and requiring further study are listed below as candidates for Corridor Action Plans and shown on Map 5. It is important to note that these may change over time and this is an ongoing process.
⬚ figure
Corridor Action Plans. Corridor Action Plans are recommended to identify functional and aesthetic improvements.
• Prepare corridor action plan for 3rd Street SE.
The 3rd Street SE Corridor Action Plan will evaluate the functional and aesthetic enhancements of the street and surrounding area from 1st Avenue E to 14th Avenue SE for the purpose of unifying New Bohemia to downtown, Czech Village, and surrounding development investments. Initial concepts were explored in the Czech Village/New Bohemia Main Street District Plan prepared in 2013.
• Prepare corridor action plan for 1st Avenue Corridor and Williams Boulevard.
The First Avenue Corridor Action Plan will evaluate multi-modal connectivity and roadway improvements between Collins Road/IA Highway 100 and Williams Boulevard SW. The First Avenue Corridor is a major east-west thoroughfare in the city that transitions between a wide range of areas (e.g., commercial districts, residential areas, etc.). This mix of land uses can also support multi-modal transportation options. This corridor currently faces many issues, including safety, access management, and congestion. The First Avenue Corridor Action Plan will identify options to improve the function and appearance of the corridor.
The Williams Boulevard Corridor Action Plan will evaluate roadway improvement alternatives between 1st Avenue and Highway 30. The Williams Boulevard SW corridor currently faces many safety issues related to access control and traffic volumes. This corridor also provides an opportunity to expand the city’s multi-modal transportation options. The alternatives identified in this plan will address existing issues and future congestion problems related to possible redevelopment along the corridor.
• Prepare corridor action plan for 16th Avenue SW.
The 16th Avenue SW Corridor Action Plan will evaluate roadway improvement alternatives between the future Highway 100 and the Cedar River. This corridor has been identified as an important freight route as several freight delivery companies are located along the corridor. As Highway 100 is completed to the west, the corridor will have a new connection that will be evaluated to determine the mobility of multi-modal traffic along the corridor. The existing corridor also features two intersections with safety issues and the potential for increased congestion. The alternatives identified in this corridor action plan will address the existing issues as well as increased congestion and multi-modal improvements along the corridor, with special attention paid to freight movement and mitigating adverse impacts on residential development north of 16th Avenue.
⬚ figure
Wayfinding
Cedar Rapids should design and gradually install a wayfinding graphics system along all its corridors that directs visitors to destinations in a clear and attractive way. Care should be given to being consistent with the existing wayfinding system in downtown.
• Prepare corridor action plan for Center Point Road NE.
The Center Point Road NE Corridor Action Plan will evaluate roadway improvement alternatives between downtown Cedar Rapids and Blairs Ferry Road NE. The corridor connects downtown to residential and commercial areas in the north and maintains high traffic volumes as it parallels I-380. The array of land uses, existing trail system, and access to public transportation also create opportunities as a multi-modal corridor. Existing issues identified along the corridor include access management, intersection safety, and future congestion issues around Collins Road/IA Highway 100. The action plan will identify alternatives to address the current access issues, intersection safety, and overall multi-modal functionality of the corridor.
MAP 3: EnvisionCR Corridor Action Plan Locations
⬚ figure
ONGOING TASKS
Develop Corridor Action Plans based on coordination with City initiatives such as road improvements or utility projects, economic development and housing development, or other planning activities like a Neighborhood or Area Action Plan.
The City will coordinate development of these plans with other City led initiatitives such as infrastructure or planning projects.
INITIATIVES
Cedar Rapids should work with the Iowa Department of Transportation to explore flexibility in its interpretation of the MUTCD and to develop a wayfinding system that is both acceptable to Iowa DOT and attractive, economical, and clear to users. This is planned to be completed in 2025.
Corridor Action Plan Locations
Cedar Rapids Boundary
An effective multi-modal transportation system for Cedar Rapids takes advantage of existing systems and looks for ways to improve them.
Air Service. Opened in 1947, the Eastern Iowa Airport (EIA) is owned by the City and is considered a small hub primary airport by the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS. The State of Iowa identifies the EIA as a Commercial Service airport as it meets the needs of the state aviation system and serves as one of its essential transportation and economic centers. The EIA has almost completed a 10 year $120 million renovation plan including adding terminal gates, jet bridges, and other passenger amenities. The EIA added three nonstop flights, as well as three nonstop destinations. With these upgrades and additions the EIA was able to serve a record setting 1.4 million passengers in 2023.
Freight. Freight, as shown on Map 7, is conducted through Cedar Rapids mainly by truck and rail. Truck traffic is primarily conducted along I-380, US Highway 151, US Highway 30, and Iowa Highway 13, and Iowa Highway 100. The City has identified truck routes for internal traffic that should be reviewed on an appropriate basis. Cedar Rapids has five railroad companies serving the City. The Union Pacific runs east/west and the CRANDIC (Cedar Rapids and Iowa City, the Canadian National, Iowa Northern, and Chicago, Central & Pacific run north/south.
⬚ figure
Transportation Options. Automobile, bicycle, transit, and pedestrian networks are highly important to the region and should be constantly monitored to make sure they serve the needs of both the City and the region.
One way to do this is through the Corridor MPO’s Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The Long Range Transportation Plan is federally mandated to be updated every five years to ensure alignment with all of its member communities' regional transportation priorities. While the Corridor MPO updates this planning document, Cedar Rapids will provide transportation projects (road, trail, and transit) to be included within it. Ultimately, the projects that enhance the regional multi-modal transportation system will be available for funding through the Corridor MPO’s Transportation Improvement Program process.
MAP 4: Freight
⬚ figure
Road Projects
Trail Projects
MAP 5: Vision Projects
⬚ figure
MAP 6: Proposed Long Range Transportation Plan Updates
⬚ figure
INITIATIVES
The plan is on schedule to be adopted in July of 2025.
No updates at this time.
Benefits of Hybrids:
Cold/ hot weather and using HVAC system drain the batteries faster.
Buses can to switch to electric when idling near schools/ hospitals etc.
No need for infrastructure overhaul, no charging stations. New initiative in 2024.
| Short Term (Within 3 Years) | |
| Medium Term (3-5 Years) | |
| Long Term (Beyond 5 Years) | |
| Vision Projects | |
| Growth Area Projects |
(blank page)
INVESTCR
IInvestCR focuses on how to foster a robust economic environment in Cedar Rapids. Many indicators point to an economy that is already strong. In 2023, Cedar Rapids had a $550 $288 million net retail surplus, a 40% 38% excess of local supply over demand, meaning the city attracts spending from outside its borders. The unemployment rate for June 2023 Cedar Rapids MSA was 3.5%, lower than the County (3.6%) and higher than State (3.0%) . From 2018 to 2022 the median home value in Cedar Rapids was $167,900, below the State average of $181,600.
Yet, concerns surface over the economic trajectory of Cedar Rapids. According to a 2013 economic study, Cedar Rapids residents expressed three top issues:
The goals of InvestCR address these economic concerns and more. This element is driven primarily by the results of the City’s Strategic Assessment for Economic Development prepared in 2014 by Angelou Economics. Goals 1, 2 and 4 in particular draw most of their content directly from the City’s Strategic Plan for Economic Development, whose main findings were reconfirmed by the latest study update in 2023. The reader is encouraged to refer to the 2014 economic development planning report for more detail on the goals which are available on the City’s economic development web portal (www. economicdevelopmentcr.com).
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
To attract and retain residents of any age, the city needs to enhance quality of life, and create a culture that drives people to form an attachment to this community. The "Soul of the Community Study" by the Knight Foundation in 2010 found that the key drivers of community attachment are: social offerings, openness, and aesthetics. Public spaces and neighborhoods should reflect these principles. The NewBo Market area is a good example of a public space that embodies these three principles.
Downtown Cedar Rapids is an important component of a young professional-friendly environment, and the implementation of the 2012 Downtown Plan will help make this a stronger asset for Cedar Rapids.
In addition, other sections of EnvisionCR provide strategies to implement this initiative, by promoting place-making, alternative transportation and diverse neighborhoods. These strategies include:
⬚ figure
TThe public sector has a role to play in the private market, by making sure policies are business friendly, fostering connections, and aligning public investments with market trends that support collective economic goals. In an increasingly global marketplace, the city is strongest when it is growing as part of a region to promote economic development. The City has many organizations active in econmic development, including the Cedar Rapids Metro Economic Alliance, Kirkwood Small Business Development Center, NewBoCo, The District, and the Entrepreneurial Development Center, Inc. The city will work with these organizations, neighboring municipalities, and others to continue to identify and rally around common regional economic goals.
The East Central Iowa Council of Governments (ECICOG) maintains an active regional economic development program through the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration (EDA). As the region’s EDA Economic Development District, ECICOG develops and implements a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) for its seven-county service area, which includes Cedar Rapids. The new CEDS, ENVISION East Central Iowa, covers the 2022 to 2026 planning period. Also, as part of its economic development initiatives, ECICOG administers the Cedar Rapids Business Assistance Revolving Loan Fund and micro loan fund (MICRO).
⬚ figure
Implement the retail and services recruitment strategy. Economic Development has an active retail attraction program, which works to recruit retailers and provides retail assessment on demand.
Promote the city’s unused fiber optic capacity to attract technology companies. Economic Development and/or IT staff coordinate meeting with entrepreneurs, competitive local exchange carriers, data local exchange carriers, and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to leverage broadband network resources.
Implement the business expansion and retention program. Economic Development uses a business retention survey tool. Through this survey, staff meets with an average of 70-90 existing businesses per year to help with retention issues and state and City incentives.
1. Partner with Urban Dreams to provide underserved communities with workforce development opportunities. Complete 2023
2. Promote core districts through façade program and other improvements. Historic Tax Credits, Reinvestment District and Destination Iowa all leverage state and federal funds for this. The Cedar Rapids Revolving Loan Fund was updated in 2022 to add more of the community outside of the flood area. Completed 2023
⬚ figure
The City of Cedar Rapids is proactively addressing the challenge of attracting new residents and businesses to ensure sustained economic growth. Recognizing the critical role of workforce availability, Cedar Rapids is collaborating with regional and national labor-market experts as part of Mayor-led Collaborative Growth Initiative. The initiative, in partnership with the City and economic development groups from Cedar Rapids, Marion, and Hiawatha, aims to identify the region's strengths, target markets, and develop a data-driven marketing plan to attract residents seeking job opportunities in the area. This first-of-its-kind local effort seeks to create a model for building a thriving community through workforce growth, with the hope that it can serve as an example for other communities facing similar workforce challenges.
Cedar Rapids has a long and established history as a major employment center within the State of Iowa. The Cedar Rapids community has 6 out of 10 businesses in the metro area and 75% of all Linn County jobs. Every business day, more than 61,000 commuters from across Iowa arrive in Cedar Rapids to work. Between the period of 2010 to 2019, Cedar Rapids saw total workforce increase from 149,975 to 157,252 persons. In many critical ways, Cedar Rapids is the economic engine of the region.
In parallel with the broader state and national economies, Cedar Rapids experienced a contraction in the size of its workforce in 2020 due to the economic shock from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Figures provided by Iowa Workforce Development show that approximately 5,700 workers exited the employment in Cedar Rapids/Linn County through 2022. However, since the brief recession in 2020, a total of 6,079 workers have returned to the Cedar Rapids labor market. In addition, regional economic model forecasts predict continued growth in the size of Cedar Rapids workforce in the next decade through 2033. As of the end of calendar year 2023, Cedar Rapids maintained an unemployment rate of 3.3% non-seasonally adjusted versus an overall unemployment rate of 3.7% nationally. Likewise, in November 2023, Iowa maintained a higher rate of labor force participation at 68.1% than the U.S overall 62.5%.
The City has made resources and services highly accessible through City's webpage. A Welcoming Week Committee was created to ensure success. Through ARPA funding the City is extending State of Iowa's Last Dollar Scholarship program to include: 1. Additional Career and Technical Education (CTE) Programs. 2. Students who don't qualify for traditional federal funding programs. 3. Students attending classes part-time.
Staff have partnered with ICR Iowa and are working on marketing and business attraction for the Airport Super Park and Big Cedar Industrial Park. Several active prospects for both sites and one project slated to go into the Airport Super Park. Develop and implement a citywide Wi-Fi network to support entrepreneurship, job skills, educational opportunities, and innovation.
⬚ figure
MEDQUARTER MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (THE LAKOTA GROUP)
Businesses receive direct benefits by close proximity and interaction with other businesses, a phenomenon often referred to as "economies of agglomeration." A concentration of businesses can use common suppliers and draw from a common customer base. Even competing businesses can benefit from each other's proximity, since a concentration of one type of business can serve to establish a niche market that attracts customers and/or workers. Business districts and corridors should make the most of these potential benefits by supporting connectivity between businesses and an active environment that attracts workers, customers, and other businesses.
Business corridors and districts also provide some of the city's most important public spaces. These types of vibrant urban spaces play a critical role in helping residents form an attachment to their community.
Strategies to achieve this goal are provided elsewhere in this document and in other plans. This goal will be achieved by implementing the recommendations of:
The City has made resources and services highly accessible through City's webpage.
Completed 2023
⬚ figure
The city, through an expanded economic development department, can take an active role in business creation, retention and expansion. The city can have the greatest effect by gathering information on business needs, coordinating access to funding or assets (such as large spaces for expansions and new development), and crafting city policies and incentives that match the needs of the local business community. In general, the public sector should be focused on activities which will act as a catalyst or support for private sector activity. Ultimately, the city should prioritize support for grassroots efforts by the local business community - efforts that will build social capital, particularly among entrepreneurs.
⬚ figure
PROTECTCR
⬚ figure
ProtectCR focuses on how to protect the city from hazards, and how to provide quality public facilities and infrastructure. As Cedar Rapids grows, maintaining efficiency and quality of infrastructure and public services are major priorities. Cedar Rapids needs to strike a balance between providing new services in growth areas and maintaining older infrastructure in existing neighborhoods in the core of the City.
Protect Cedar Rapids from flooding and other hazards.
In 2008, Cedar Rapids experienced billions of dollars in damage due to flooding. The community has engaged in a multitude of planning processes and the City has initiated countless infrastructure projects to reduce the incidence of flooding and ensure community members and buildings are protected against flood events. Cedar Rapids has taken a four-part recovery approach:
Some of the most densely populated areas of the community, including the downtown, are in the floodplain. These areas need protection and Cedar Rapids is implementing a strategic approach to development to minimize flood risk.
Immediately after the flood of 2008, the City began developing two flood recovery plans, which established the goals for recovery and an initial alignment for the flood control system. At the same time, the City worked with the Army Corps of Engineers on a feasibility study for permanent flood control. This study led to the City receiving $220 million in federal funds for construction of flood control on the east side of the river. Additionally, the City worked with the State to create the Flood Mitigation Program, which resulted in Cedar Rapids receiving $269 million in funding for the west side of the river.
MAP 1: Flood Control System Alignment (2025)
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
In 2015, the City of Cedar Rapids adopted the Flood Control System (FCS) Master Plan. The mission is to "reduce flood risk through the heart of Cedar Rapids on both the west and east sides of the river, and incorporate aesthetic elements that reflect our community's culture, history, and vision." Goals in this plan mirror several of the goals of EnvisionCR.
The Master Plan includes the alignment for the FCS, as shown in Map 1, along with an anticipated timeline for design and construction. The Master Plan also addresses funding for the Flood Control System, including local, State, and Federal sources.
As of 2025 the Flood Control System is 30% complete and projected to be 58% complete by July 2026. Though not fully complete, the Flood Control System has still significantly reduced the resources required to implement the flood response strategies. Compared to 2015, 300 manhole/intake wells versus the 200 required today, 40 storm sewer plugs versus 15 required today, 10,600 units of hesco barriers versus 5,600 required today, and 53,250 cubic yards of temporary berms versus the 37,850 cubic yards needed today. Additionally, the progression in the Flood Control System is estimated to save over 10,000 man-hours in temporary flood fighting operations.
The Flood Control Master Plan, along with materials from open houses, can be found at: http://www.cityofcr.com/floodcontrol
⬚ figure
SOURCE: CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM
DRAFT CONCEPT RENDERINGS FROM THE FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM OF FIVE SEASONS PLAZA PARK
Following the 2008 flood, Cedar Rapids engaged residents through numerous community input meetings to shape a vision for riverfront redevelopment. Feedback from these meetings informed the River Corridor Redevelopment Plan and the Neighborhood Planning Process. Community members prioritized creating a vibrant, mixed-use riverfront that enhances connectivity, supports economic growth, and improves quality of life. A key theme was ensuring the riverfront served as public open space, with flood control integrated as a community amenity rather than a barrier to riverfront views.
The McGrath Amphitheatre not only serves as a vibrant venue for local events and concerts, but it was also the first completed segment of the City’s permanent flood control system on the west side. The levee was designed in a traditional amphitheater style to both allow attendees from any location within the site see performances and protect the City from future flooding. Additionally, removable flood panels can be installed when needed to safeguard the area during potential flood hazards.
Originally, the skatepark and playground at Riverside Park were located farther from C Street SW. To accommodate construction of the permanent flood control system, these amenities were removed and replaced with a detention basin and pump station. However, the City collaborated closely with the local skating community and a globally recognized skatepark designer to develop a new, larger, and more advanced skatepark—enhancing both recreation and resilience.
Many flood control improvements at Cedar Lake are now complete and include a new levee and a pipeline connection to the Cedar River. The City is now in the process of completing the ConnectCR project that will increase and enhance recreational opportunities for all ages and abilities on and around Cedar Lake. Once this surrounding construction is finalized (end of 2026), the area will offer expanded recreational opportunities while also functioning as an overflow basin during potential flood events—blending utility with community benefit.
In 2014, the City created a plan for a cohesive riverfront greenway that includes flood protection as well as integrated public park amenities. The Greenway Parks Plan was updated in 2024 to reflect current realities including design and construction of the Flood Control System and nearby private redevelopment. When fully implemented, there will be three greenway park spaces with resilient infrastructure—creating a multifunctional riverfront that protects and connects.
In addition to flooding, the City is committed to protecting the community against other potential hazards through the implementation of the Linn County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. This plan is updated every five years, with the most recent plan adopted in 2025 to cover 2025-2030.
The Linn County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies hazards that the city should prepare for based on an assessment of hazards by probability of occurrence, severity, and other factors. The plan rates the following as "high priority" hazards for Cedar Rapids: river flood, flash flood, drought, thunderstorm, lightning and hail, severe winter storm, tornado and windstorm, and transportation incident.
The Linn County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan provides guidance on minimizing the negative impacts of natural, technological, and human-caused hazards. The goals of the plan are to:
As the Plan points out, many hazard threats are addressed by ongoing city operations. For example, the city protects against infrastructure failure through the regular inspections and maintenance.
To address hazards not covered by ongoing operations, the plan includes an action plan for Cedar Rapids, with high priority actions that are expected to be addressed during the life of this plan. Some key actions are listed below, with the complete Action Plan included in the appendix.
⬚ figure
INITIATIVES
City has been working on the final design of the 8th Avenue Bridge Replacement over the Cedar River to meet the main grant requirement of September 30, 2026. The West Side FCS received its first federal funding grant announcement of $25 million from the USDOT. Other progress includes completing a levee through Cedar Lake and opening of a storm water pump station in Czech Village.
Completed in 2023.
The City is an active member of the Indian Creek Watershed Management Authority (ICWMA), the Middle Cedar Watershed Management Authority (MCWMA), and the Lower Cedar Watershed Management Authority. The ICWMA Watershed Masterplan was published in 2015 and has received a technical assistance grant for 2018-2022. Completed in 2023.
The City of Cedar Rapids strives to provide the highest quality services to the community. A large portion of services provided to the community come from Fire, Police Utilities and Public Works. The Police Department and the Fire Department are committed to the community they serve when responding to calls for service and interacting with citizens. Police Officers and firefighters respond to approximately 146,000 calls for service to the community each year.
IUtility services provides raw and potable water, maintains separated sanitary and storm sewer systems, garbage recycling and yard waste collection, and wastewater treatment. All of these services provided by the Utilities and Public Works Departments are vital to the safety of citizens. Today, the network of mains that is used to provide drinking water to citizens is 715-plus miles in length and distributes municipal water to more than 140 thousand residents and industrial users at up to 60 million gallons per day.
Community facilities such as recreation centers, municipal offices, and fire stations are an important facet of Cedar Rapids’ quality of life and are critical to public safety. These public facilities represent large capital assets that must respond to the needs of current and future residents and future growth needs. Although these features sustain life in the community – they are often only noticed when they are absent, or something goes wrong. Yet, they have a major impact on residents’ satisfaction with the City and with the direction of future growth.
The City has established and continues to grow and facilitate partnerships with private entities in the community who provide serivces to residents. Involvement in these partnerships may involve participation and coordination by City staff or funding from the City.
⬚ figure
The Fire Department inspects new and existing buildings, but population growth and limited staffing have made annual inspections impossible. Following national guidelines, inspections now occur on 1 , 2 , or 3 year cycles based on risk. Even with this schedule, the City cannot meet all inspection needs, so high risk occupancies such as apartments, schools, and large public venues are prioritized. To restore regular inspection of industrial facilities and strengthen safety and economic resilience, the City will add three new positions: Industry Liaison, Legacy Inspector, and Construction Projects Liaison.
A recent study highlighted significant facility and infrastructure gaps across most fire stations, including limited security systems, inadequate storage, lack of modern decontamination and fitness spaces, outdated IT capacity, insufficient privacy accommodations, and building layouts that slow response times. The department also lacks a training facility that meets industry standards.
The Fire Department will continue building partnerships, refining its organizational structure, and implementing the Strategic Plan to strengthen prevention, education, and emergency response. The Operations Division will assess and enhance programs across Emergency Medical
Services (EMS), fire suppression, hazardous materials, special operations, and training. Through the CARE Team a coalition of service providers the department will also focus on addressing frequent medical calls related to residents with complex needs.
The Fire Department Was accredited by the Commission on Fire Accreditation International in 2018 and was reaccredited in 2023. CRFD will continue to meet the standards for accreditation.
The Cedar Rapids Police Department provides a broad range of essential services supporting the safety, stability, and wellbeing of the community. The Department will continue conducting targeted traffic enforcement to improve roadway safety and further refine and improve the use of video camera systems on City-owned property to aid investigations. Reducing crime remains an ongoing priority. Departmental policies and directives outlined in the Police Department’s Strategic Plan drive those efforts. The Department continues to implement coordinated strategies aimed at reducing gun violence and enhancing community safety. These efforts have led to repeated years of shots-fired reports in decline, and a rising level of safety in the city. Investigators work tirelessly for victims and have successfully closed every homicide since 2020.
Training and hiring practices are designed to reflect our community’s population and needs, ensuring we deliver the highest level of service on every call.
In addition to core public safety and emergency response functions, the Police Department provides a wide range of community caretaking services, including School Resource Officers, public education initiatives, victim assistance, and crime prevention programs.
Specialized units such as Canine, Special Response Team (SRT), Police Community Action Team, District Lieutenants, Narcotics, Financial, Person, and Property Crimes give our officers the ability to address crime, and more importantly – prevention – at every level in our city. The Department also manages reports and records services providing transparency, accountability, and public access to information.
Since earning accreditation from the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) in 2019 and achieving reaccreditation in 2023, the Department remains committed to maintaining this national standard of excellence through rigorous annual review.
Together, these efforts reflect the Department’s ongoing commitment to ensuring a safe and resilient community for residents, businesses and visitors.
The Cedar Rapids Police Department proudly operates a specialized K9 Unit, which has historically been supported primarily through generous community donations. This dedicated unit currently consists of eight K9 teams and provides 24-hour coverage across the City.
The program began in the 1970s, originally focusing on schools, airports, and bus terminals to deter drug trafficking. Over the years, the unit has expanded its capabilities. Today, the K9s use their exceptional sense of smell to assist in tracking suspects, locating missing persons, detecting illicit drugs and explosives, and conducting article and building searches.
Since its inception, the department has had a total of 33 K9 officers serve alongside their human partners, playing a vital role in public safety and community engagement.
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
The Cedar Rapids Utilities Department delivers essential water and wastewater services across the region; providing high-quality drinking water to residents and businesses in Cedar Rapids, as well as to the City of Robins, the Poweshiek Water Association, and several additional properties in Linn County. Advanced wastewater treatment facilities serve Cedar Rapids and the neighboring communities of Marion, Hiawatha, Robins, and Palo, along with select Linn County properties. These vital services ensure a reliable water supply and environmentally responsible wastewater management for thousands of customers throughout the metropolitan area and those downstream of our city. Cedar Rapids was recognized for a fifth time in 2025 for having Iowa’s Best-Tasting Drinking Water; a recognition that has been received three of the past four years.
Before approving any new development with significant water demands, Cedar Rapids Utilities conducts a comprehensive capacity evaluation. This process includes analyzing current system performance, projected water usage, and infrastructure requirements to ensure reliable service without impacting existing customers. The work is done closely with developers to plan for sustainable growth while maintaining system integrity.
Cedar Rapids is also committed to supplying water that is safe for every family, business, and visitor. Utilities actively monitors and addresses emerging contaminants, including PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), through rigorous testing and treatment strategies that meet or exceed state and federal standards. The water is certified as safe for infants and young children, giving parents confidence that their baby’s formula and drinking water are free from harmful substances.
The Cedar Rapids Public Works Department is committed to building and maintaining the infrastructure that keeps our city moving. Through six specialized divisions, we deliver essential services that support safety, mobility, and quality of life.
• Construction Engineering oversees major capital improvement projects, including new streets, sidewalks, and trails. This division ensures projects are designed and built to meet safety, sustainability, and community needs.
• Engineering provides technical expertise for city infrastructure, managing design standards, drainage systems, and long-term planning to support Cedar Rapids’ growth.
• Real Estate handles property acquisition and right-of-way management for public projects, ensuring timely coordination and compliance with regulations.
• Sewer Maintenance maintains and repairs the city’s sanitary and storm sewer systems, protecting water quality and reducing flood risks through proactive inspections and emergency response.
• Street Maintenance is responsible for the upkeep of more than 1,400 miles of city streets, including resurfacing, pothole repairs, snow and ice control, and street sweeping to keep roads safe and accessible year-round.
• Traffic Engineering & Operations manages traffic signals, signage, and roadway safety improvements, using data-driven strategies to enhance mobility and reduce congestion.
• Flood Control implements and maintains permanent flood protection systems along the Cedar River, including levees, floodwalls, and pump stations, safeguarding homes, businesses, and critical infrastructure from high-water events.
Together, these divisions form a comprehensive team dedicated to maintaining reliable infrastructure, supporting economic development, and improving everyday life for residents and businesses in Cedar Rapids.
Public Works (PW) received accreditation in 2023 through American Public Works Association (APWA) Accreditation demonstrating full compliance with 322 practice statements. PW will continue to seek accreditation status and quality services.
INITIATIVES
Achieve American Public Works Association Accreditation. Completed in 2023
Replace or update outdated facilities (Bender Pool, Parks Maintenance, Twin Pines Clubhouse, Ellis Clubhouse, and Gardner Clubhouse) to create modern and sustainable facilities. Close to being finished with an assesment which will provide guidance on the condition of all community pools. Ellis Clubhouse is done, and Gardner Clubhouse is expected to be finished spring 2026. Parks Maintenance updates haven't started.
Evaluate high risk structures and target hazards for increased emergency response needs, fire prevention activities, fire protection systems and equipment per adopted codes, standards, regulations, and policies. Completed in 2020
Identify, evaluate, and acquire technology, equipment, and facilities to improve infrastructure and service delivery per the Cedar Rapids Fire Department Strategic Plan. The new strategic plan is part of the Commission on Fire Accreditation International process and is the basis of planning for the department from 2023-2027. It consists of four strategic priorities: community risk reduction, maximizing operational effectiveness, employee health and safety, and employee training and company readiness. Completed in 2023.
Evaluate the standard of cover and current operational model Completed in 2023
Prepare a fire station assessment and relocation plan based on the current and future needs of the City, firefighter health, and facility design best practices. Completed in 2023
Acquisition of a new off-site facility that would provide space for evidence storage and personnel, and Crime Scene Unit. The search for a suitable location continues. There's currently no plans to move Joint Communications from it's current location.
Review options and most successful way to implement a new records management system. A project manager has been hired. Implementation is moving forward. Sheduled to be in place by 2028. Schedule changed to 2-3 years in 2025.
Review Municipal Code sections utilized by the Police Department to determine areas of improvement. Completed in 2023.
Review workload and duties associated with specialty assignments assigned to Criminal Investigation Division to determine areas of improvement and efficiency. Completed in 2023.
Review digital evidence procedures and research areas of opportunity to streamline and improve Public Information Requests and requests for the County Attorney. A new RMS (Records Management System) is being implemented to replace the current one.
Review diversion programs offered in all schools Cedar Rapids Police Officers are located in to ensure programs offered are beneficial to youth and the community. Reviewed in collaboration with CRCSD and school year data.
All buildings in Cedar Rapids should use best practices in building construction, such as energy efficiency and on-site stormwater management. One of the most visible ways to encourage this to develop public facilities as demonstration pieces for exemplary design and construction practices.
To ensure community safety and recovery, city buildings and infrastructure should be built with emergency management in mind. Existing building codes are designed to limit threat from fire, wind, and other dangers. Code enforcement should continue to be a priority, in order to ensure the safety of residents.
refers to facilities that pose significant risks or hold essential community functions during a flood event. This includes hospitals and similar institutions; buildings that store critical documents, data, or equipment of high public value; facilities that contain hazardous materials or fuel; power installations needed during emergencies; and other buildings with comparable uses.
Under this definition, facilities such as hospitals, police and fire stations, jails, museums, water and wastewater treatment facilities, critical server or data centers essential for City operations, and buildings that store emergency response materials or vital records are all subject to these elevated design standards if located within either the regulatory floodplain or the Shaded X Zone on the map below.
Most standard City facilities fall under the typical floodplain regulations of Chapter 32B. However, any building that meets the definition of Maximum Damage Potential must be designed and protected to a higher standard specifically, up to two feet above the 500-year (0.2% annual-chance) flood event. These requirements apply not only within the standard floodplain but also within the mapped 500-year flood zone (Shaded X Zone).
⬚ figure
The Downtown Library, Central Fire Station, City Services Center, Ellis Clubhouse, and the Ground Transportation Center are all examples of exceptional facilities. Cedar Rapids can highlight these facilities through signage, tours, and other means – as examples of what the community would like to see replicated in the private sector.
Program City staff from various departments — including Community Development, Building Services, Police, Finance, and Public Works — teamed up to develop the Saving Properties and Revitalizing Communities (SPARC) Program. This program is designed to address issues caused by abandoned or vacant tax-delinquent properties that can negatively impact neighborhoods. In partnership with Linn County, the SPARC Program will strategically acquire these properties and facilitate their disposition through a Request for Qualification (RFQ) process, making the properties available to affordable housing developers or adjacent neighbors when redevelopment is feasible. A resolution to establish the program will be considered during the 8/8 council meeting
MAP 2 : FEMA Flood Zones
⬚ figure
A, AE, AE, FLOODWAY X, 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD
FEMA Flood Zones
(blank page)
⬚ figure
1959 – 2014
⬚ figure
Gary Kranse joined the City of Cedar Rapids in November 2013, as Director of Community Development and Planning. Co-workers and community members alike were immediately drawn to his positive attitude, friendly spirit, and generous nature.
A visionary and people-person, Gary dove whole-heartedly into spearheading the development of the city's new Comprehensive Plan – EnvisionCR. We owe much to his passion and commitment. His leadership set a precedent for strong community engagement which continues to inspire his staff to this day.
In his short time with us, Gary's tenacity and enthusiasm quickly united departments and helped form strong ties with the surrounding community. This collaborative spirit only served to enhance the depth of EnvisionCR's emerging themes and goals, shaped by those inspired to join the process. His leadership and foresight helped in crafting an inclusive and thoughtful plan shaped by as many participants as possible. We lost Gary far too early; his sudden passing in April of 2014 left a personal void that will be impossible to fill. But his work will continue; not in a binder on a shelf, but in a vision that can be found at the intersection of outreach and community participation. We are committed to seeing this plan used to the fullest, in all areas of City planning and development.
It is fitting that we open the next chapter of this plan – the implementation – with words we heard spoken by Gary many times.
Let's pound it out.
"The plan should be viewed as a dynamic changing document that is used actively by the city."
⬚ figure
A review of the public engagement process and trends indicated by previous plans, reports, and studies.
The principles of the plan emerged through the public engagement process, and established the desirable conditions for Cedar Rapids' future.
The structure of the plan is organized around six strategic elements, each providing goals and initiatives for public policy.
An ongoing process that uses and updates the plan.
IMPLEMENTING ENVISIONCR
DiscoverCR lays the conditions for future change in the community, forecasting a possible growth of 30,000 people between 2015 and 2035 to achieve a population over 160,000. This increase represents a demand for new housing and services within the city and on its fringe, more commercial services, and new jobs. In front of this growth are the city’s Guiding Principles, which lay the groundwork of decision-making for the coming twenty years. EnvisionCR articulates the principles into goals and initiatives organized around six Elements, including StrengthenCR, GrowCR, GreenCR, ConnectCR, InvestCR, and ProtectCR. These six elements, with their narratives and maps, are the core of EnvisionCR.
This section focuses on Initiatives for implementation. These key areas include:
Responsibilities for the roles of decision-makers and staff are grounded in planning ethics established by the American Institute of Certified Planners.
The public, decision-makers, and staff must be concerned for the short- and long-range consequences of present actions on the public. EnvisionCR promotes excellence of design, while preserving the integrity of the natural and built environment.
Responsibilities: Elected/Appointed Officials Decision-makers, along with staff, must be conscious of the rights of others. Decisions should expand choices and opportunities for all persons, including the disadvantaged, and promote racial and economic integration. Officials include the City Council and City Boards and Commissions.
Responsibilities: City Staff City staff should continue to seek meaningful input from the public on the development of plans and programs. EnvisionCR is rooted in a public engagement process, and thereby the goals and initiatives represent the aspirations of the community. Recommendations from staff to decision-makers should provide accurate information on planning issues to all affected persons and to governmental decision makers.
The city should perform an evaluation and review of the Initiatives and at least two Elements of EnvisionCR annually. The review group should consist of department managers who will obtain feedback from a variety of sources including the City Planning Commission and other appropriate organizations.
Staff will also obtain input from youth. Youth can help Cedar Rapids to understand and respond to the needs and wants of the next generation. Through this input process, the city can:
City staff will provide City Council with proposed updates identified through the evaluation process. This updated information can then be utilized during the city's planning and budgeting process as described in the Plan Update section.
The scope of EnvisionCR is both ambitious and long-term. Each of the many actions and policies described in the plan can contribute to the betterment of the city. Yet, presenting a twenty-year development program at one time can appear daunting. So, the evaluation and review process, described in the previous section, will be done annually. This will provide flexibility to account for changing conditions.
Cedar Rapids should use the plan to define policies, actions, and capital investments for the upcoming year. This effort should be coordinated with Cedar Rapids' existing capital improvement planning and budgeting process, although many of the plan’s recommendations are not capital items. This annual process should be completed before the beginning of each budget year.
The tables following in this chapter present a concise summary of the Goals and Initiatives of EnvisionCR. The Goals and Initiatives in Tables 1 - 6 are organized according to their Element.
These Initiatives include various types of efforts:
TABLE 1: Plan Evaluation and Review Schedule
| Section | 4-Year Strategic Program | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
| DiscoverCR (Population Change) | Review | |||
| StrengthenCR | Update | Review | ||
| InvestCR | Update | Review | ||
| GrowCR | Update | Review | ||
| ConnectCR | Update | Review | ||
| GreenCR | Update | Review | ||
| ProtectCR | Update | Review |
A schedule for implementing the Initiatives is shown in the tables. This schedule indicates when the Initiative would begin and is advisory in nature. Updating of the schedule will be part of the Plan Evaluation and Review process. Projects indicated within the first year are policy/action/capital considered to be high priority Initiatives and can be catalysts for other Initiatives.
Lead represents the leader for the Initiative, which is the city but may include coordination with public, private, or non-profit entities. Other city departments that may contribute to accomplishing these Initiatives are listed here as Partners.
References direct the user of this plan to review pages in this plan.
To keep EnvisionCR up to date it will be necessary to make amendments to the plan. However, as the foundational document that guides development, most amendments to EnvisionCR should happen annually and through a comprehensive effort to address changes to the community overtime.
Future Land Use Map Amendments. The Future Land Use Map plays a key role in guiding the recommendations and decisions of the City Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment and the City Council. Amendments to the Future Land Use Map may be necessary to accommodate new development which meets the goals of the city but are not permitted by the adopted Future Land Use Map. Amendments should be carefully considered by the City Planning Commission and the City Council and should be based on findings that they support the Guiding Principles and Goals of EnvisionCR. The process to amend the Future Land Use Map is described in the city’s Zoning Ordinance but should generally involve review by City Planning Commission and then a hearing and resolution by City Council.
Public notification should be provided in a manner similar to rezoning applications. Amendments may be initiated by the city as a result of planning initiatives or a review of current development patterns. Amendments to the Future Land Use Map may also be required as part of proposed development.
Amendments to Initiatives. Amendments to the Initiatives table shall be made by resolution of City Council after review and recommendation by the City Planning Commission as part of the Annual Evaluation Process.
Text Amendments. Project-specific text amendments, such as proposed changes to the Guiding Principles, Goals, Elements and Land Use Typology Areas, are discouraged unless done as part of a comprehensive review process.
Other Plan Amendments. Map and text amendments to EnvisionCR may be necessary as part of a city-led planning effort, such as the Neighborhood Action Plans, Master Greenway Plan, Transportation Plan and Comprehensive Trails Plan. If amendments to EnvisionCR are necessary, they shall happen concurrently with the adoption of the plan or plan update.
Administrative Changes. Changes to the document to fix typos or update hyperlinks should be documented and changed administratively by staff but do not require action by City Council.
This page intentionally left blank.
(blank page)
GROWCR - MAP 1: Future Land Use Map
⬚ figure
Due to the dynamic nature of the Future Land Use Map, all instances of this map shown in this document are intended to be representative. The official Future Land Use Map shall be maintained by the City and made available online or upon request.
Map available online. Visit: www.cedar-rapids.org/government/departments/community-development
PROTECTCR - TABLE 1: Hazards Addressed by Cedar Rapids Operations (Table 10 of Linn County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan)
| Hazard | Justification |
|---|---|
| Infrastructure Failure | • Public Works regularly inspects, maintains, and improves infrastructure. For submerged infrastructure like the 5 in 1 Dam, diver inspections are completed regularly.<br>• The city enforces buildings codes, and the fire and police departments are trained to respond to structural failure or fire. The Eastern Iowa Airport, which is owned by the city, has fire suppression equipment specific to aircraft and trained personnel.<br>• In addition, the majority of the city's critical facilities have backup power generation. |
| Hazardous Materials Incident | • City employees are trained to properly handle hazardous materials, and the city maintains safety plans.<br>• The fire and police departments are trained to immediately respond to hazard material incidents, and the Cedar Rapids Fire Department includes the hazardous materials response team for the area. In addition, Tier II hazard material listings are maintained for the area. |
| Terrorism | The fire and police departments are trained to response to terrorist events and complete training at local institutions such as schools. |
| Levee and Dam Failure | Public Works regularly inspects, maintains, and improves infrastructure. For submerged infrastructure like the 5 in 1 Dam, diver inspections are completed regularly. Flood protection failure may become a higher priority after the city constructs a comprehensive flood protection system. TaT2024 |
| Human Disease | The city maintains a clean secure water supply, wastewater treatment, and coordinates with Linn County Public Health. |
| Animal, Plant, Crop Disease | The city maintains vegetation in public areas. Due to the urban nature of the city, the risk of animal and crop disease directly impacting the city is minimal. |
| Earthquake | The risk of an earthquake severe enough to cause damage occurring in the area is minimal. Buildings codes are enforced and increase the likelihood structures can withstand a minor event. |
| Grass and Wildland Fire | The city maintains vegetation in public areas, and the fire and police departments are trained to respond to grass and wildland fire events. |
| Sinkholes | Geological hazards are mitigated in the infrastructure design and construction process. |
| Landslide | Geological hazards are mitigated in the infrastructure design and construction process. |
| Expansive Soils | Geological hazards are mitigated in the infrastructure design and construction process. |
SOURCE: LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN, JUNE 2014
PROTECTCR - TABLE 2A: Cedar Rapids Hazard Mitigation STRATEGY (Table 107 of Linn County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2019-2024)
| ID | Proposed Mitigation Action | Hazard(s) Addressed | Goal(s) Addressed | Inclusion in Previous Plan | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Participate in the Community Resilience Roundtable Program and implement supporting projects | All hazards | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | X | Pilot program of the National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences Resilient America Roundtable. Community meetings have been ongoing, and some projects are in development. |
| 2 | Install flood warning system on Indian Creek | Flood | 1, 2, 4, 5 | X | Coordinating with the Army Corps of Engineers, adjacent cities, and the East Central Iowa Council of Governments was in the "Current Mitigation Activities" category in the previous plan. The Indian Creek Watershed Management Authority was created. The multi-jurisdictional and multi-disciplinary group is developing a watershed management plan and coordinating with the Silver Jackets to develop a warning system. The project is still needed as the USGS shut down the river gage in Marion. |
| 3 | Complete stormwater outfall backflow protection project | Flood | 1, 2, 5 | X | This project is underway and partially completed. Stormwater pipe outlets have been added at the Cedar River. |
| 4 | Install backup power sources for traffic lights | Flood | 1, 3, 5 | X | This project is underway. 70 of the City's 185 traffic lights have had backup power installed, and the City has funding for 30 more. |
| 5 | Complete Vinton ditch improvements | Flood | 1, 2, 5 | X | This project is in progress and involves bank stabilization. |
| 6 | Acquire, relocate, elevate, and/or demolish structures in flood hazard areas or structures subject to repetitive damage | Flood | 1, 2, 5 | X | This project is ongoing and actions are taken as funding is available. |
| 7 | Expand the city's outdoor warning siren system | Tornado and windstorm, lightning, and hail | 1, 4, 5 | X | Possible areas for expansion include the Tuma Soccer Complex or the area around County Home Rd. and C Ave |
| 8 | Construct safe rooms in public facilities and recreation areas | Tornado and windstorm, lightning, and hail | 1, 5 | X | |
| 9 | Harden public facilities to withstand wind and other severe weather damage | Tornado and windstorm, lightning, and hail | 1, 2, 5 | X |
SOURCE: LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN, 2019
PROTECTCR - TABLE 2A: Cedar Rapids Hazard Mitigation STRATEGY (...continued Table 107 of Linn County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2019-2024)
| ID | Proposed Mitigation Action | Hazard(s) Addressed | Goal(s) Addressed | Inclusion in Previous Plan | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Add additional shallow water wells to the city's water supply | Drought | 1, 3, 5 | X | Well #5 is under construction. Other wells are planned. |
| 11 | Complete the city's Permanent Flood Protection Project which includes the following phases: <br>• Ellis Ln. NW to I-380 <br>• I-380 to 8th Avenue SW <br>• 8th Ave. SW to 12th Ave. SW (Ingredion) <br>• 12th Ave. SW to Cedar Rapids/Linn County Solid Waste Agency Site 1 <br>• I-380 at 7th St NE to Cargill (Bean) and around Quaker Oats to A Ave. NE <br>• A Ave. NE to 8th Ave. SE <br>• 8th Ave. SE to Alliant Substation <br>• Alliant Substation to Cargill (Corn) <br>• 30 gate closures and 11 pump stations <br>• 8th Ave. Bridge replacement and raising | Flood | 1, 2, 3, 5 | X | This is a long term project currently under design and construction, with completion expected in the 2030s, subject to funding availability. This project is being implemented into smaller subsegments for construction. Each completed subsegment mitigates against flooding. There is currently an initiative to evaluate the possibility and benefit of extending the east side system concept upstream to McLoud Run and J Ave NE to protect additional properties. |
| 12 | Complete the City's FCS Edgewood Bridge and approach improvements | Flood | 1, 2, 3, 5 | X | |
| 13 | Develop and implement a City response plan for Indian Creek flooding | Flood | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | X | Previously this action related to participating in the Indian Creek Watershed Management Authority planning process. The WMA has completed their master plan, which the city participated in. Separately, the city could develop a flood response plan for the Indian Creek. |
| 14 | Add detention basins and other stormwater infrastructure to increase stormwater management capability and reduce flood risk | Flood | 1, 2, 3, 5 | X | These activities will be guided by the City's developing Stormwater Master Plan. This project may complement the Indian Creek Watershed Management Plan and the Middle Cedar Watershed Management Plan. |
| 16 | Complete and maintain a debris management plan and any related contracts | All hazards | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
SOURCE: LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN, 2019
PROTECTCR - TABLE 2B: Cedar Rapids Hazard Mitigation STRATEGY (...continued - Table 107 of Linn County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan)
| ID | Proposed Mitigation Action | Hazard(s) Addressed | Goal(s) Addressed | Inclusion in Previous Plan | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Update Stormwater Master Plan and prioritized Capital Improvement Project list | Flood | 1, 2, 3, 5 | X | The City is in year 3 of 5 of the update cycle for the Stormwater Master Plan. The committee wanted to expand the strategy from the previously approved plan to include their planning framework. |
| 16 | Complete and maintain a debris management plan and any related contracts | All hazards | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | ||
| 17 | Participate actively in Watershed Management Authorities (WMA) that Cedar Rapids is a member of and support the WMA's plans. | Flood | 1, 2, 3, 5 | ||
| 18 | Where possible, identify and implement projects that complement the Flood Risk Management goal and objectives of the Indian Creek Watershed Management Plan | Flood | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | ||
| 19 | Install backup generators at critical facilities/ pumping stations | Flood | 1, 2, 3, 5 | ||
| 20 | Complete vulnerability assessment of Joint Communications Network and address vulnerabilities | All | 3, 4, 5 | ||
| 21 | Continue development of Cedar River Flood Response Plan | Flood | 1, 2, 3, 5 | ||
| 22 | Update Sanitary Sewer Master Plan and prioritize Capital Improvement Project list | Flood | 1, 2, 5 | ||
| 23 | Implement mitigation projects outlined in Repetitive Loss Area Analysis | Flood | 1, 2, 4, 5 | Refer to Appendix E |
SOURCE: LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN, 2019
PROTECTCR - TABLE 4: Benefit vs. Cost Criteria (Table 139 of Linn Co. Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan)
| Type | Benefit | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| High | Results are likely immediate and/or widespread reduction of risk from hazard(s) addressed; generally supported by the community; lead agency has capabilities. | Existing funding is not adequate to complete the project; funding may only be available through grants/assistance; anticipated to cost greater than $100,000. |
| Medium | Results are likely a long-term reduction of risk from hazard(s) addressed and/or results are not widespread; potential community opposition; lead agency has capabilities. | Requires amending the budget and/or requires a bond to complete the project; anticipated to cost between $10,000 and $100,000. |
| Low | Results are difficult to determine and/or may not result in long-term reduction of risk from hazard(s) addressed; definite community opposition; lead agency may encounter capability issues. | Existing funding is adequate or the project can be completed through volunteer and/or staff time; anticipated to cost less than $10,000. |
SOURCE: LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN, 2019
"To determine how a mitigation strategy should be completed, an action plan and timeline for mitigation actions was determined through a prioritization process that considered local priorities, local operations, potential benefit, and estimated cost. Ultimately, mitigation actions were assigned a priority level, which determines the potential timeline for completion. Refer to Tables 13 and 14."
PROTECTCR - TABLE 5: Mitigation Action Priority Level (Table 140 of Linn Co. Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan)
| Priority Level | Potential Timeline | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1-5 Years | The mitigation action will be addressed during the current plan period. |
| 2 | 5-10 Years | The mitigation action may become a higher priority in the plan update. |
| 3 | 10-15 Years | The mitigation action maybe become a higher priority in the plan update or will not be completed until higher priority mitigation actions are complete. |
SOURCE: LINN COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN, 2019
"For most jurisdictions, not all mitigation actions considered in the prioritization process met exact criteria. The planning committee in Cedar Rapids developed the final action plan to ensure the priority level for each mitigation actions reflects local risks, priorities, and operations. See Table 15 for Cedar Rapid’s action plan."
PROTECTCR - TABLE 2A: Cedar Rapids Hazard Mitigation STRATEGY (Table 107 of Linn County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2019-2024)
| Priority Level | ID | Proposed Mitigation Action | Lead | Potential Partner(s) | Benefit | Cost | Potential Funding Source(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | Participate in the Community Resilience Roundtable Program and implement supporting projects | City Manager | Linn County | High | Low | City, partners, Resilient America, and other to be identified |
| 1 | 2 | Install flood warning system on Indian Creek | Indian Creek Watershed Management Authority | Iowa DNR, Cedar Rapids, Marion, Linn County, ACE, IFC | High | Medium | ACE, USGS, IFC |
| 1 | 3 | Complete stormwater outfall backflow protection project | Public Works | High | Medium | City Stormwater Utility | |
| 1 | 4 | Install backup power sources for traffic lights | Public Works | IDOT | High | Low-Medium | City, others to be identified |
| 1 | 5 | Complete Vinton ditch improvements | Public Works | High | High | CDBD, Local Option Sales Tax, FMA | |
| 1 | 6 | Acquire, relocate, elevate, and/or demolish structures in flood hazard areas or structures subject to repetitive damage | Public Works | IHSEMD, ACE | High | High | City, ACE, HMGP, PDM, FMA |
| 1 | 7 | Expand the city's outdoor warning siren system. | City Manager | IHSEMD, Linn County EMA | High | Medium | City, HMGP, PDM |
| 1 | 8 | Construct safe rooms in public facilities and recreation areas | City Manager and Parks and Recreation | Linn County EMA | High | High | City, HMGP, PDM |
| 1 | 9 | Harden public facilities to withstand wind and other severe weather damage | City Manager and Public Works | High | High | City, HMGP, PDM | |
| 1 | 11.01 | Complete the city's Flood Control System (FCS) Project phase from Ellis Ln. NW to I-380 | Public Works | ACE, FEMA, Iowa DNR | High | High | City, CDBG, State, other locally available sources |
| 1 | 11.02 | Complete the city's Flood Control System (FCS) Project phase replacing and raising the 8th Ave. Bridge | Public Works | ACE, GSA | High | High | City, ACE, other locally available sources |
PROTECTCR - TABLE 2A: Cedar Rapids Hazard Mitigation STRATEGY (Table 107 of Linn County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2019-2024)
| Priority Level | ID | Proposed Mitigation Action | Lead | Potential Partner(s) | Benefit | Cost | Potential Funding Source(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.03 | Complete the city's Flood Control System (FCS) Project phase from I-380 to 8th Ave. SW | Public Works | ACE, FEMA, Iowa DNR | High | High | City, State, other locally available sources |
| 1 | 11.04 | Complete the city's Flood Control System (FCS) Project phase from 8th Ave. SW to 12th Ave. SW (Ingredion) | Public Works | ACE, FEMA, Iowa DNR | High | High | City, State, other locally available sources |
| 1 | 11.05 | Complete the city's Flood Control System (FCS) Project phase from 12th Ave. SW to Cedar Rapids/Linn County Solid Works Agency Site 1 | Public Works | ACE, FEMA, Iowa DNR | High | High | City, State, other locally available sources |
| 1 | 11.06 | Complete the city's Flood Control System (FCS) Project phase from I-380 at 7th St. NE to Cargill (bean facility) and around Quaker Oats to A Ave. NE | Public Works | ACE | High | High | City, State, other locally available sources |
| 1 | 11.07 | Complete the city's Flood Control System (FCS) Project phase from A Ave. NE to 8th Ave. SE | Public Works | ACE | High | High | City, State, other locally available sources |
| 1 | 11.08 | Complete the city's Flood Control System (FCS) Project phase from 8th Ave. SE to Alliant Substation | Public Works | ACE | High | High | City, State, other locally available sources |
| 1 | 11.09 | Complete the city's Flood Control System (FCS) Project phase from Alliant Substation to Cargill (corn facility) | Public Works | ACE | High | High | City, State, other locally available sources |
| 1 | 11.10 | Complete the city's Flood Control System (FCS) Project phase installing 30 gate closures and 11 pump stations | Public Works | ACE | High | High | City, State, other locally available sources |
| 1 | 12 | Complete the City's Flood Control System (FCS) Edgewood Bridge and approach improvements | Public Works | IHSEMD | High | Medium-High | City, HMGP, PDM, FMA |
| 1 | 13 | Develop and implement a City response plan for Indian Creek flooding | Public Works | Indian Creek Watershed Management Authority | High | High | Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund, HMGP, PDM, FMA |
PROTECTCR - TABLE 2A: Cedar Rapids Hazard Mitigation STRATEGY (Table 107 of Linn County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2019-2024)
| Priority Level | ID | Proposed Mitigation Action | Lead | Potential Partner(s) | Benefit | Cost | Potential Funding Source(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | Add detention basins and other stormwater infrastructure to increase stormwater management capability and reduce flood risk | Public Works | Medium | Medium-High | Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund, FMA | |
| 1 | 15 | Update Stormwater Master Plan and prioritize Capital Improvement Project list | Public Works | IHSEMD | High | Medium | Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund, CDBG, HMGP, PDM, FMA |
| 1 | 16 | Complete and maintain a debris management plan and all related contracts | City Manager | High | Low | City | |
| 1 | 17 | Participate actively in the watershed management authorities (WMA) that Cedar Rapids is a member of and support the WMA's plans | Public Works | WMAs | High | Low | City |
| 1 | 18 | Where possible, identify and implement projects that complement the Flood Risk Management goal and objectives of the Indian Creek Watershed Management Plan | Public Works | IHSEMD | City, HMGP, PDM, FMA, other locally available grants | ||
| 1 | 19 | Install backup generators at critical facilities/pumping stations | Finance | High | Medium | City, HMCP, PDM | |
| 1 | 20 | Complete vulnerability assessment of Joint Communications and address any vulnerabilities | Information Technology | High | Low-Medium | City | |
| 1 | 21 | Continue development of Cedar River Flood Response Plan | Public Works | IFC | High | Medium | City |
| 1 | 22 | Update Sanitary Sewer Master Plan and prioritized Capital Improvement Project list | Public Works | IHSEMD | High | Medium | Sanitary Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund, City, CDBG, HMGP, PDM, FMA |
| 1 | 23 | Implement mitigation projects outlined in Repetitive Loss Area Analysis | Public Works | IHSEMD | High | Low-High | City, HMGP, PDM, FMA |
| 2 | 10 | Add additional shallow water wells to city's water supply | Utilities | High | High | City |
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
⬚ figure
RDG PLANNING ● DESIGN HRGreen