⬚ figure

TRANSFORM CLARK COUNTY

MASTER PLAN

⬚ figure

ADOPTED - NOVEMBER 17, 2021

⬚ figure

Acknowledgements

The Transform Clark County project and the updated Master Plan would not have been possible without the contributions of thousands of individuals. Elected and appointed officials, County staff, local and regional agencies and service providers, neighborhood leaders, and community members contributed ideas, provided valuable feedback, shared information with neighbors, and invested their time and energy toward creating this Master Plan. We recognize the value of everyone who participated in the process, with special thanks to the following individuals and groups for their contributions.

Board of County Commissioners

Marilyn Kirkpatrick, Chair Jim Gibson, Vice-Chair Michael Naft Ross Miller William McCurdy II Tick Segerblom Justin Jones Lawrence Brown (2020) Lawrence Weekly (2020)

Planning Commission

Nelson Stone, Chair Steve Kirk, Vice Chair Jenna Waltho Timothy Castello Edward Frasier III Vivian Kilarski Duy Nguyen Donna Tagliaferri (2020) Tom Morley (2020)

Comprehensive Planning Department Staff

Nancy Amundsen, Director Mario Bermudez, Planning Manager Sami Real, Planning Manager Shane Ammerman, Assistant Planning Manager Garrett TerBerg, Principal Planner Paul Doerr, Senior Planner Greg Cerven, Senior Planner Dan Kezar, Senior Planner Melissa Candek, Planner Michael Homa, Senior GIS Analyst Alexander Tong, GIS Analyst II

ADOPTED - NOVEMBER 17, 2021

⬚ figure

Other County Departments

Administrative Services Aviation Building Business License Clark County Water Reclamation Community and Economic Development District Attorney Environment & Sustainability Fire Parks & Recreation Public Communications Public Works Real Property Management Social Services

Town Advisory Board (TAB) and Citizen Advisory Council (CAC) Representatives

Bunkerville Town Advisory Board Enterprise Town Advisory Board Goodsprings Citizens Advisory Council Indian Springs Town Advisory Board Laughlin Town Advisory Board Lone Mountain Citizens Advisory Council Lower Kyle Canyon Citizens Advisory Council Moapa Town Advisory Board Moapa Valley Town Advisory Board Mountain Springs Citizens Advisory Council Mt. Charleston Town Advisory Board Paradise Town Advisory Board Red Rock Citizens Advisory Council Sandy Valley Citizens Advisory Council Searchlight Town Advisory Board Spring Valley Town Advisory Board Sunrise Manor Town Advisory Board Whitney Town Advisory Board Winchester Town Advisory Board

Local and Regional Agencies

City of Boulder City City of Henderson City of Las Vegas City of Mesquite City of North Las Vegas Clark County Regional Flood Control District Clark County School District Las Vegas Valley Water District Nellis Air Force Base Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Southern Nevada Water Authority University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Consultant Team

Clarion Associates MIG, Inc.

List of Maps

Acronyms

Photo Credits

All photos provided by

• Clark County
• Clarion Associates
• Shutterstock
• Flickr Creative Commons

Contents

Section 1: Introduction | 1

About the Master Plan | 3 Core Values | 7 Relationship to NRS Requirements | 8 Parts of the Plan | 10 Amending and Updating the Plan | 11 Related Plans and Studies | 13

Section 2: Countywide Goals and Policies | 15

About this Section | 16 Core Value 1: Unique Communities, Neighborhoods, and Lifestyles | 18 Core Value 2: Equitable Access to Programs, Services, and Amenities | 28 Core Value 3: A Healthy and Sustainable Natural and Built Environment | 36 Core Value 4: A More Connected Clark County | 44 Core Value 5: A Diverse and Resilient Economy | 52 Core Value 6: Sustainable and Resilient Growth and Development | 60

Section 3: Growth Framework | 69

About this Section | 70 Planned Land Use | 71 Neighborhoods | 73 Commercial and Mixed-Use Areas | 86 Employment | 93 Other | 99 Infrastructure and Services | 103 Water Resources | 105 Natural and Manmade Hazards | 107 Federal Lands | 108 Airport Environs | 116

Section 4: Area-Specific Goals and Policies | 118

About This Section | 119 Enterprise | 121 Laughlin | 126

Lone Mountain 131

Northeast County 135

Northwest County 146

South County 161

Spring Valley 176

Summerlin South 181

Sunrise Manor 185

Whitney 190

Winchester/Paradise 194

Section 5: Implementation 200

About this Section 201

Partner Organizations 202

How to Use this Section 203

Core Value 1: Unique Communities, Neighborhoods, and Lifestyles 204

Core Value 2: Equitable Access to Programs, Services, and Amenities 206

Core Value 3: A Healthy and Sustainable Natural Environment 208

Core Value 4: A More Connected Clark County 210

Core Value 5: A Diverse and Resilient Economy 212

Core Value 6: Predictable Growth and Development 213

(blank page)

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

The Clark County Master Plan (the Master Plan) is the result of a multi-year effort—Transform Clark County—to establish a cohesive, countywide vision for the future and a defined strategy to achieve that vision. The updated Master Plan is one of two major outcomes from Transform Clark County. The other is a rewrite of Clark County’s key regulatory document—the Unified Development Code (Title 30). The updated Master Plan serves as the policy guide for the growth and physical development of Clark County and informs updates and interpretations of the Title 30.

Although the Master Plan has been amended and revised over time, it has not been comprehensively updated since 1983. Since that time, Clark County has grown by more than 427 percent—from an estimated 530,195 residents to approximately 2,266,715 in 2020. During that time Clark County has transformed by almost every measure. The population boom has resulted in a corresponding increase in development, often at a fast pace and increasingly without updated guidance from the Master Plan about the desired form, location, or character of that development.

Alongside the surge in population and development has been the growth of new and old industries—the Las Vegas Valley has grown into the gaming and entertainment capital of the world and has become a popular tourist destination. Other major industries and employers are tied to the many military facilities in Clark County, and the growth of federal, state, and local government agencies to serve the growing population. Increasingly, Southern Nevada has seen economic growth from technology firms, the cannabis industry, professional sports, and recreation-related business. These shifts necessitate a fresh look at how to comprehensively plan for the future of Clark County.

Over time, the Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act (SNPLMA) disposal boundary has been expanded to allow for additional development and growth in the Las Vegas Valley. At the same time, land for development is finite, so efficient use of available land is important. Recent changes to the landscape of Clark County include the periodic establishment or expansion of land designated for wildlife habitat, scenic preservation, and recreational use; plans for transit-oriented development (TOD) and future expansion of high-frequency transit service along major roadways in the Las Vegas Valley. These efforts indicate a need for revitalization and investment in older neighborhoods, a desire for more sustainable development practices, and recognition of alternative approaches needed to accommodate growth.

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION

About the Master Plan

The Master Plan is required by NRS 278.150 through 170 to serve as the comprehensive master plan for Clark County. The Master Plan is an important tool for identifying the community’s core values and desired quality of life in the next ten to 20 years. The Master Plan also establishes the goals and policies that are used by Clark County to achieve the community’s vision for the future, alongside regional partners and the residents of Clark County. While the Master Plan addresses issues of regional significance, this Master Plan applies specifically to unincorporated portions of Clark County. Incorporated cities within Clark County are responsible for preparing and implementing their own plans.

While the previous plan for Clark County was organized into elements to cover each of the required topics of NRS §278.160, this Master Plan modernizes that approach by focusing on a series of themes—or core values—that cover each of the required topic areas. This approach recognizes the interrelated nature of each topic area and the need for the Master Plan to inspire the community and spur action toward achieving a common vision.

Engagement at Each Phase

The master planning process was divided into six phases with opportunities at each stage for input. A summary of these opportunities is provided below. A detailed summary of community comments and survey results is provided in the Community Outreach Summaries.

As noted previously, this process included a rewrite of both the Master Plan and Development Code. As a result, opportunities for input on both documents were provided at strategic points during the Master Plan portion of the process to ensure recommendations were aligned.

Project Kick-Off

A series of initial stakeholder interviews and online meetings were held in July 2020 with elected and appointed officials, staff from relevant County departments, representatives from other communities and agencies in Clark County (e.g., city representatives, the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, Clark County School District, and Southern Nevada Water Authority), TAB and CAC representatives, and the public at-large—including the development community, environmental advocates, business owners, and residents. The purpose of these initial meetings was to introduce the purpose and scope of the project and begin to gather ideas from key stakeholders about issues and opportunities to be addressed as part of the Master Plan and Title 30 rewrites.

Vision and Goals

Building on the results of the initial stakeholder meetings, an online survey was developed to seek input from the community-at-large about current and future conditions in Clark County. The survey was offered in English and Spanish and was widely advertised through traditional and social media channels. More than 2,800 responses were received. The results provided insight into resident opinions on issues and opportunities in Clark County related to the built and natural environment, transportation, recreation, housing, the economy, and quality of life. The survey also provided insight into resident values and their vision for the future of Clark County.

The results of this initial survey were used to develop the Preliminary Plan Framework, which identified six draft core values for Clark County, and proposed supporting goals and policy topics for consideration. The Preliminary Plan Framework was the focus of a second round of online meetings held in September 2020. A second online survey was also offered (in both English and Spanish) over more than a month in September and October 2020. Nearly 900 responses were received.

Policy Directions

Based on the input received on the Preliminary Plan Framework, the fourth phase of the project—Policy Directions—began to establish a more detailed framework of goals and policies. This phase included three rounds of public engagement— one to provide general input on the Title 30, one to review the Draft Countywide Policies, and one to review the draft Area-Specific Policies and Draft Land Use Categories.

An online survey to inform the Title 30 rewrite was launched in November 2020 to help inform kick-off meetings for that portion of the process that were held in January 2021. Over 500 people responded to the survey.

A third round of community and stakeholder meetings on the Master Plan was conducted in December 2020 to review the Draft Countywide Policies, followed by an online input opportunity that ran through the end of January 2021.

A fourth round of public engagement on the Master Plan—in April and May 2021—focused on the Draft Area-Specific Policies, Draft Land Use Categories, and Preliminary Zoning Districts (to provide direction and ensure alignment with the Title 30). A virtual open house allowed the public to review the full document online and leave comments specific to individual planning areas. This virtual open house also included public review of draft land use categories with similar functionality for leaving comments and a side-by-side map where the public could see how the new categories might be applied to the future land use map. During this phase, County staff also worked closely with TABs and CACs to solicit input specific to individual planning areas.

Draft Master Plan

The Draft Master Plan was distributed for review on the project website and through an e-blast to website subscribers and stakeholder contacts in July 2021. Notice of the available draft for public review was distributed in partnership with the Clark County Public Communications Office through local media outlets and social media, along with efforts by elected and appointed officials to distribute to their constituents. In addition to making the document available to download and review through the project website, the Draft Master Plan was published online through a web-portal allowing anyone to add comments to specific places in the Draft Master Plan. Another fifth series of public meetings was held online and in-person in July and August 2021 to solicit feedback on the Draft Master Plan from elected and appointed officials, County staff, TAB and CAC representatives, regional agencies and partners, and members of the public.

Master Plan Adoption and Implementation

During the final phase of the project – Master Plan Adoption and Implementation—feedback on the Draft Master Plan was used to further refine the Master Plan. The updated Master Plan was then published for public review and adoption meetings were held with the Clark County Planning Commission (PC) and Clark County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with opportunities for the public to comment prior to adoption of the Master Plan.

Unified Development Code (Title 30)

As noted earlier, the Transform Clark County process included a review and rewrite of Title 30, which was completed during the project phases following adoption of this Master Plan. Some outreach efforts were combined earlier on in the Master Plan process to improve efficiency. For example, during the project kick-off meetings, attendees were asked to weigh-in on Title 30 issues like the user-friendliness of Title 30, development quality, historic preservation and neighborhood character, application review procedures, and barriers to developing under the current Title 30.

Changing Approaches

After kicking-off the Transform Clark County project in early 2020, the Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to dramatic changes to the County’s approach to gathering community input and engaging the community in the planning process. The dual public health and economic crises led to an increased focus on day-to-day issues among many local leaders, regional agencies, County departments, and community members. Necessary limitations on in-person meetings and workshops also required alternative approaches to public outreach and engagement.

⬚ figure

In the initial phases of the planning effort, the County quickly adapted to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic by enhancing the role of the project website and incorporating more online surveys, virtual meetings, and web-based tools. In many ways this approach allowed for greater transparency and reduced barriers to public involvement in the process, but these methods also invariably impacted the way that many in Clark County were able to participate.

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION

4,200

SURVEY RESPONSES

⬚ figure

93

ONLINE & IN-PERSON MEETINGS

⬚ figure

600+

MEETING ATTENDEES

⬚ figure

406

INDIVIDUAL COMMENTS/ LETTERS RECEIVED

⬚ figure

Who Participated?

Over the course of the process, over 5,000 people provided feedback. However, early observations of meeting attendance and data collected from early online surveys indicated underrepresentation of young, lower-income, and non-white residents. Often language barriers, experience and comfort with engaging in government-led processes, and time constraints limit engagement among these groups, but unequal access to computers and internet may also be barriers. The COVID-19 pandemic also disproportionately impacted the physical and economic health of these same communities.

To help engage a broader range of participants, more meeting times were offered, and meetings were scheduled at different times of day and days of the week. Online surveys, flyers, and meeting materials were translated into Spanish where possible, and alternative ways of participating online (e.g., surveys and virtual workshops) were offered to allow people unable or uncomfortable with attending online meetings to share their ideas and feedback. Targeted outreach to specific groups was also conducted to build awareness about the process and encourage broader participation.

ABOUT THE MASTER PLAN

⬚ figure

Water Conservation Innovative Leadership Affordable Business Friendly Welcoming Diverse Futuristic Planning Responsible Transportation Preservation Economy Infrastructure Accessible Safe Recreation Thriving Optimistic Beautiful Employment Clean Air Adaptable Strong Resilient Inclusive Together Unity Stability Green Open Communication Healthcare Smart Efficient Destination Less Government More Police Nature Education Exciting Help the Homeless Equality Vibrant Modern Jobs Connected Peaceful Quality Accepting Sustainable Forward-Thinking Friendly Entertainment Prosperous Justice Tourism Technology Diverse Economy Clean Equitable Conservation Low Taxes Renewable Energy Affordable Housing Resident-Friendly Growth Opportunity Progressive Walkable Slow Growth Family-Friendly Community Arts and Culture Hopeful Healthy Less Crowded Open Space Low Crime Less California Conservative

Core Values

During the third phase of the project, as part of the identification of the community’s vision and values, survey responses were used to better understand the issues important to Clark County residents. The word cloud, on the previous page, depicts the most common phrases that survey respondents used when asked: “What three words best characterize your vision for Clark County’s future?”

These responses, along with feedback provided during online public meetings, other survey data, and study of community issues led to the development of six core values:

Because the core values are closely interrelated, they are intended to be viewed as being equal in weight and are not listed in any particular order of importance. This foundation encourages systems thinking to recognize and emphasize the interrelationships among all aspects of the community’s vision. A systems thinking perspective recognizes the interdependent economic, social, and environmental implications of policies, decisions, and outcomes, and recognizes the benefits and trade-offs across these topic areas. The core values serve as the organizing structure for the countywide goals and policies.

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

Relationship to NRS Requirements

In counties with a population greater than 700,000 residents, NRS §278.160 requires the Master Plan to include eight topical elements along with a number of sub-elements. The graphic on the following pages illustrates the relationship between each of the six core values and the policy topics they encompass compared to the required NRS elements and sub-elements. Supporting and technical information required by NRS §278.160 is provided in other sections of the plan.

Section 3: Growth Framework, addresses NRS requirements related to transportation, conservation, and public facilities and services. Section 5: Implementation, details the initiatives that will support the plan and the roles and responsibilities of the County and other partners for implementation, and the appendices—notably, Appendix A: Supplemental Information (Countywide) and Appendix B: Supplemental Information (Area-Specific)—provide a library of supporting data, information, and documentation related to sections of the Master Plan and information required by NRS §278.160.

⬚ figure

Core Value #1:

Unique Communities, Neighborhoods, and Lifestyles

TOPICS ADDRESSED

• Housing access/affordability
• Complete neighborhoods (design of new neighborhoods)
• Established neighborhoods
• Freestanding communities
• Rural neighborhoods
• Historic Preservation

RELATIONSHIP TO NRS REQUIREMENTS

• Housing
• Historic Preservation
• Land Use (community design and development, master planned communities, rural neighborhoods preservation plan, mixed-use development)

Core Value #2:

Equitable Access to Services and Amenities

TOPICS ADDRESSED

• Parks, trails, and open space
• Health and human services
• Arts and culture

RELATIONSHIP TO NRS REQUIREMENTS

• Recreation and open space

Core Value #3:

A Healthy and Sustainable Natural Environment

TOPICS ADDRESSED

• Air quality
• Energy
• Water
• Waste reduction
• Natural areas
• Federal lands

RELATIONSHIP TO NRS REQUIREMENTS

• Conservation
• Energy

⬚ figure

Core Value #4:

A More Connected Clark County

TOPICS ADDRESSED

• Multimodal transportation
• Regional collaboration
• Transparent and inclusive government

RELATIONSHIP TO NRS REQUIREMENTS

• Transportation

⬚ figure

Core Value #5:

A Diverse and Resilient Economy

TOPICS ADDRESSED

• Employment and job base
• Education/workforce
• Business-friendly environment

RELATIONSHIP TO NRS REQUIREMENTS

• Public Facilities and Services (economic and schools sub-elements)

⬚ figure

Core Value #6:

Predictable Growth and Development

TOPICS ADDRESSED

• Growth management
• Alignment with adopted plans
• Development quality
• Hazard mitigation
• Adequate public facilities
• Mixed-use and Transit-oriented development

RELATIONSHIP TO NRS REQUIREMENTS

• Land use
• Public Facilities and Services (utilities/ aboveground utility plan sub-elements)
• Safety (fire, police, and natural & man-made hazards sub-elements)

Parts of the Plan

The Master Plan contains five interrelated sections in addition to this introductory section. The core values serve as a foundation for each of these Master Plan components. The graphic below provides an overview of the key components of each section.

SECTION 2: Countywide Goals and Policies. Establishes a policy framework guide day-to-day decision-making on issues of importance to Clark County as a whole.

SECTION 3: Growth Framework. Addresses the various factors that influence growth and development in unincorporated Clark County:

• Planned Land Use. Includes the Countywide Planned Land Use Map and Land Use Category definitions.
• Infrastructure and Services. Provides an overview of infrastructure and service provision at a countywide level, generally, who provides which services, how they are funded, what plans and regulations are in place, and who administers them. Topics addressed include flood control and drainage, libraries, public safety, recreation and open space, schools, transportation, utilities, and water and wastewater.
• Natural and Manmade Hazards. Provides an overview of land- and water-related hazards that directly impact growth and development in Clark County.
• Federal Lands. Summarizes land use and resource considerations that apply to the more than 4.5 million acres of federal land in Clark County.
• Airport Environs. Provides an overview of land use considerations related to Clark County’s many airports and associated maps.

SECTION 4: Area-Specific Goals and Policies. Supplements Section 2: Countywide Goals and Policies with guidance unique to each of the 11 planning areas in Clark County—Enterprise, Laughlin, Lone Mountain, Northeast County, Northwest County, South County, Spring Valley, Summerlin South, Sunrise Manor, Whitney, and Winchester/Paradise. This section also supplements Section 3: Growth Framework with Planned Land Use maps for each of the planning areas.

SECTION 5: Implementation. Highlights major initiatives that will support the implementation of the Master Plan through the coordinated efforts of Clark County departments in collaboration with multiple governmental agencies and partner organizations.

APPENDICES. Five appendices provide a library of supporting data, information, and documentation related to sections of the Master Plan and information required by NRS §278.160.

• Appendix A. Supplemental Information (Countywide). Contains technical information and data related to transportation, recreation and open space, federal lands, and conservation issues in Clark County to supplement overview provided in Section 3: Growth Framework.
• Appendix B. Supplemental Information (Area-Specific). Contains background information specific to each of the 11 planning areas. Topics addressed include infrastructure and services, natural and manmade hazards, historic and cultural resources, and habitat conservation.
• Appendix C. The State of the County report. Provides an overview of the County’s jurisdiction, representation, services, distinct geographies, regional partners, and other factors that influence how Clark County provides services and plans for the future. Also provides contextual data and trends associated with Clark County’s population, demographics, housing stock, growth, and economy.
• Appendix D. Glossary of Terms. Defines key terms used throughout the Master Plan as a reference for users.
• Appendix E. Community Outreach Summaries. Includes a summary of input received during the Master Plan update.

⬚ figure

Amending and Updating the Plan

The Master Plan is intended to provide policy guidance for a ten- to 20-year planning horizon. However, periodic plan amendments and updates will be necessary to keep the Master Plan relevant as conditions change, new issues and opportunities emerge, actions are completed, and priorities shift. Generally, the Master Plan should be reviewed annually or biennially to determine whether minor or major amendments are needed. The timing of updates to area-specific goals and policies and planning area land use plans (as contained in Section 3) will vary. Master Plan amendments and updates and should follow the criteria and considerations outlined below.

Minor Amendments

Minor amendments to the Master Plan (including appendices) may be proposed for targeted text or map revisions that do not significantly affect other plan goals or policies. Minor amendments may be initiated by the Director of the Department of Comprehensive Planning (Director), the Planning Commission, or the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). The Director shall make a recommendation on the proposed amendment to the Planning Commission, who, in turn, provides a recommendation to the Board. While there are no limits on the number of minor amendments to the Master Plan, such amendments should generally be consolidated into a package of routine amendments that is brought forward once a year. There are no time limits for public hearings or BCC decisions regarding minor amendments. In order to adopt a minor amendment, the BCC must find that the change is justified because:

1. There is evidence that an error exists in the mapped location of a geographical feature, including without limitation, topography, slopes, hydrographic features, wetland delineations and floodplains;
2. The name of a jurisdiction, agency, department, or district by the County, governing board or other governing authority, or other entities is altered; or
3. Statistical information included in the Master Plan (e.g., annual population estimates) is updated by a new or revised study.

Major Amendments

Major amendments to the Master Plan can be initiated by the Director, the Planning Commission, or the BCC, or by a person’s application. The Director shall make a recommendation on the proposed amendment to the Planning Commission, who, in turn, provides a recommendation to the Board. When considering a major amendment to the Master Plan, the following criteria should be evaluated:

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the overall intent of the Master Plan;
2. The proposed amendment is required based on changed conditions or further studies;
3. The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding area;
4. Strict adherence to the current goals and policies of the Master Plan would result in a situation neither intended by nor in keeping with other core values, goals, and policies;
5. The proposed amendment will not have a negative effect on adjacent properties or on transportation services and facilities;
6. The proposed amendment will have a minimal effect on service provision or is compatible with existing and planned service provision and future development of the area; and
7. The proposed amendment will not cause a detriment to the public health, safety, and general welfare of the people of Clark County.

Land Use Plan Updates

Historically, the County has updated the Master Plan and each planning area land use plan every five years. However, some planning areas are rapidly growing and changing while others are experiencing less dramatic shifts. As a result, the practice of updating each planning area land use plan on a five-year rotation has underserved some communities while in other planning areas, this has resulted in minimal changes.

Upon adoption of this Master Plan, updates to the land use plans and associated goals and policies for each planning area will be updated based on their relative need. Plans for fast-growing planning areas in the Las Vegas Valley should generally be reviewed and updated every three to five years while more stable planning areas should generally be updated every five to ten years. The table below identifies planning areas considered to be evolving or stable based on conditions at the time of the Master Plan’s completion, a recommended schedule for each, and potential review triggers that may warrant a deviation from the recommended schedule.

A review schedule will be maintained by the Department of Comprehensive Planning and updated as necessary as part of routine updates and amendments.

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION

Related Plans and Studies

The Master Plan is the overarching policy guidance for Clark County, but many other plans have been—or will be—adopted by the County, its various departments, and other regional agencies and service providers. Some plans are regional in scale while others provide more detailed guidance on a particular topic or a smaller geography. Related plans and studies are referenced throughout this Master Plan to highlight the County’s role in supporting the implementation of plans developed by other regional agencies or partners, and to note where those plans and studies will help support the implementation of the goals and policies adopted as part of this Master Plan.

Alongside the development of the Master Plan, the County recently adopted the first phase of its All-In Sustainability and Climate Action Plan, which focuses on taking action to address climate change and create a more sustainable future for Clark County. Phase 1 focuses on measures that the County can employ in its day-to-day operations to ensure the well-being and prosperity of everyone in Clark County, today and into the future. As a next step, the County recently initiated the second—community-facing—phase of the All-In Sustainability and Climate Action Plan in collaboration with regional partners. While this Master Plan places significant focus on sustainability, many of the goals and policies in this document are intended to support the more detailed goals and actions of the All-In Sustainability and Climate Action Plan.

Instead of replicating the detailed goals and policies of various other plans, this Master Plan captures the community’s big-picture vision and ensures alignment with the many topic- or area-specific plans within Clark County. This approach ensures that the Master Plan is user-friendly and grounded in the community’s overall goals for the future, while also ensuring alignment between various plans or policy direction.

⬚ figure

(blank page)

SECTION 2

COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

⬚ figure

About this Section

This section of the Master Plan establishes a policy framework to guide day-to-day decision-making. Countywide goals and policies should be used as a reference when questions arise or guidance is needed on the County’s position on a particular topic or issue. Many of the goals and policies reflect the current practices of Clark County and its partnerships with others at the regional, state, and federal level. Others are new, and reflect community and stakeholder feedback received as part of the Transform Clark County process. Because they are applicable countywide, goals and policies in this section are intentionally broad. More detailed policy guidance for individual planning areas within Clark County is provided in Section 4: Area-Specific Goals and Policies.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

CORE VALUE 1: UNIQUE COMMUNITIES, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND LIFESTYLES

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

Where are we today?

Clark County is made up of many unique neighborhoods and communities, and residents place a high value on protecting this diversity. The county offers a wide range of lifestyles, from “big city” urbanized areas to sparsely populated rural expanses, plus everything in between. Residents wish to maintain this wide array of choices in lifestyle without losing sight of common goals that apply to the county as a whole.

Diverse neighborhoods and communities require diverse goals. In some older, established areas, residents would like to see the existing neighborhood fabric and character preserved. Other areas are ripe for reinvestment and revitalization. Residents on the fringe of the Las Vegas Valley are concerned about expanding development, and in addition to protection of lower density areas, would like to see an emphasis on transition areas between higher and lower density neighborhoods. Outlying communities would like to maintain their distinction from the Las Vegas Valley. Residents would also like to have a higher bar set for new neighborhoods in unincorporated Clark County.

Whatever the character of an area and the goals that are appropriate to it, the overarching objective of maintaining affordability unites them all. Residents recognize that a greater diversity of housing types would help to achieve this, and they are clear that there are areas where mixing single-family homes with apartments, duplexes and other kinds of units would be welcome development. Similarly, many would like to see more mixed-use centers and neighborhoods where various housing types and shops, restaurants, and services exist side-by-side.

In 2050, Clark County is a place where...

• Rural and outlying communities continue to thrive alongside urban areas, and areas of different character progress from one into another with logical transitions between them;
• There are many choices about the kind of place we call home, and the existence of those choices helps assure that home is a place affordable to all; and
• A family-friendly atmosphere thrives alongside many lifestyle options to accommodate the diverse population.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

⬚ figure

CV 1: UNIQUE COMMUNITIES, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND LIFESTYLES

Countywide Goals and Policies

Goal 1.1: Provide opportunities for diverse housing options to meet the needs of residents of all ages, income levels, and abilities

POLICY 1.1.1: MIX OF HOUSING TYPES

Encourage the provision of diverse housing types at varied densities and in numerous locations. In particular, seek opportunities to expand “middle” housing options that are less prevalent in unincorporated parts of Clark County, such as duplexes, townhomes, three- and four-plexes, and smaller multi-family complexes.

POLICY 1.1.2: HOUSING ACCESS

Concentrate higher-density housing in areas with access to existing or planned high-frequency transit, major employment centers, existing infrastructure, and other services.

POLICY 1.1.3: MULTI-GENERATIONAL HOUSING

Support the integration of detached or attached accessory dwelling units (ADUs) as part of new development and/or in established neighborhoods to support aging-in-place and expand the supply of smaller dwelling units. [See also, Policy 1.4.4, Infill and Redevelopment]

⬚ figure

POLICY 1.1.4: SUPPORTIVE HOUSING

Encourage housing options that incorporate universal design and visitability principles to facilitate aging-in-place, and accommodation of older residents and others with mobility limitations or disabilities.

POLICY 1.1.5: HOUSING FOR VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

Collaborate with local and regional partners on development of programs and resources to prevent residents from becoming homeless and facilitate the provision of expanded housing for vulnerable populations, including the elderly and those transitioning away from homelessness. [See also, Goal 2.3, All Clark County residents have access to the high-quality health and social services they need, and supporting policies]

Goal 1.2: Expand the number of long-term affordable housing units available in Clark County

POLICY 1.2.1: EXISTING AFFORDABLE UNITS

Maintain the supply of long-term affordable housing (restricted for 20-50 years) by focusing efforts on rehabilitation and preservation of existing affordable units particularly in areas where redevelopment pressure exists or is likely to occur in the future.

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

POLICY 1.2.2: FINANCIAL SUPPORT

Support programs that use state, federal, and local housing program funds to preserve existing affordable housing and provide financial assistance to lower income homeowners to maintain their properties in good condition and improve energy efficiency.

POLICY 1.2.3: NON-PROFIT OWNERSHIP

Encourage acquisition of housing by non-profit organizations, land trusts, or tenants as a strategy to protect housing from upward pressure on prices and rents.

POLICY 1.2.4: REGULATORY TOOLS

Investigate the feasibility of implementing regulatory requirements (e.g., inclusionary zoning), targeted incentives, and public-private partnerships to promote expanded construction of climate resilient affordable housing units throughout the County.

POLICY 1.2.5: DISPOSAL LAND

Support the implementation of affordable housing development plans on former Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands designated for the development of affordable housing. [See also, Goal 6.1, A coordinated pattern of development in unincorporated Clark County, and supporting policies]

⬚ figure

POLICY 1.2.6: NEW AFFORDABLE UNITS

Continue to work with community and regional partners to evaluate the feasibility of and pursue a variety of strategies that will expand the number of affordable units, such as, but not limited to activity bonds, housing trust funds, land banks or land trusts, and fee-in-lieu programs.

Goal 1.3: Encourage the development of new neighborhoods that embody Clark County’s core values

POLICY 1.3.1: NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITY

Encourage the integration of varied housing models, architectural styles, streetscapes, signage, common landscaped areas, and other character-defining features that contribute to a distinct neighborhood identity.

POLICY 1.3.2: MIX OF HOUSING OPTIONS WITHIN NEIGHBORHOODS

Encourage a mix of housing options—both product types and unit sizes—within larger neighborhoods and multi-family developments.

POLICY 1.3.3: NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES

Encourage the integration of grocery stores, restaurants, medical offices, and other daily-needs services as part of

⬚ figure

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

or adjacent to new neighborhoods to minimize the need for longer-vehicle trips. Promote direct connections that allow residents to safely access services on foot or by bike.

POLICY 1.3.4: INTER-CONNECTED NEIGHBORHOODS

Seek opportunities to connect new and existing neighborhoods with sidewalks and trails where “stubs” exist or where new connections would improve access to existing or planned amenities and services. Avoid “walling off” neighborhoods except in locations where noise or other characteristics of adjacent uses impact neighborhood livability. Where walls are warranted, provide periodic breaks for pedestrians and bicycles.

POLICY 1.3.5: NEIGHBORHOOD LIVABILITY

Encourage the integration and connection of parks, trails, community gardens, common open space, recreational amenities, or other features in new neighborhoods to enhance the health and quality of life of residents. [See also, Goal 3.6, Focus on incorporating enhanced sustainability and resilience practices into the built environment, and supporting policies.]

Goal 1.4: Invest in and care for established neighborhoods

POLICY 1.4.1: NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS

Support efforts to make neighborhood improvements (e.g., trail connections, increasing tree canopy, complete street improvements) that enhance neighborhood quality and pride, reduce crime, and improve climate resilience.

POLICY 1.4.2: EXISTING HOUSING STOCK

Support the retention of existing housing stock in unincorporated Clark County. Encourage ongoing maintenance and promote reinvestment and improvements in declining areas and targeted redevelopment of blighted properties. Work with property owners, neighborhoods, and non-profit organizations to bring substandard units into compliance with adopted codes, improve overall housing conditions and generally prolong the lifespan, efficiency, and habitability of older homes. [See also, Goal 3.6, Focus on incorporating enhanced sustainability and resilience practices into the built environment, and supporting policies.]

POLICY 1.4.3: CODE ENFORCEMENT

Continue to respond to potential violations of Clark County codes in an efficient and effective manner. Assist in resolving citizen complaints related to zoning violations, short-term rentals, solid waste, sign enforcement, graffiti, and other neighborhood concerns through education, service, and enforcement.

POLICY 1.4.4: INFILL AND REDEVELOPMENT

Encourage infill development and redevelopment in established neighborhoods through flexible standards and other regulatory incentives, while promoting compatibility with the scale and intensity of the surrounding area. Establish more detailed guidance in conjunction with periodic updates to planning area land use plan maps and area-specific goals and policies. [See also, Policy 1.1.3, Multi-Generational Housing]

POLICY 1.4.5: BUFFERS AND TRANSITIONS

Standardize requirements for buffers and development transitions to mitigate the impacts of higher intensity uses proposed adjacent to an existing or planned residential neighborhood.

Goal 1.5: Maintain opportunities for Ranch Estate lifestyles within the Las Vegas Valley

POLICY 1.5.1: RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION AREAS

Support the protection of existing Rural Neighborhood Preservation (RNP) areas as defined by NRS §278.

Rural Neighborhood Preservation Areas

While many large-lot neighborhoods in unincorporated Clark County are commonly referred to as RNPs, not all of these neighborhoods meet the legal definition. According to NRS §278.0177, a “Rural preservation neighborhood” means a subdivided or developed area:

1. Which consists of ten or more residential dwelling units;
2. Where the outer boundary of each lot that is used for residential purposes is not more than 330 feet from the outer boundary of any other lot that is used for residential purposes;
3. Which has no more than two residential dwelling units per acre; and
4. Which allows residents to raise or keep animals non-commercially.

Countywide Goal 1.5 and associated policies, in conjunction with the Ranch Estate Neighborhood (RN) land use category and key considerations for neighborhoods outlined in Section 3: Growth Framework, are intended to protect the character of existing neighborhoods that meet this definition as adjacent properties develop over time.

⬚ figure

POLICY 1.5.2: COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT

Adopt and implement standards to protect the established character and lifestyles associated with RNP areas and minimize future conflicts with higher intensity development planned on sites that are adjacent to RNP areas, or infill development within a RNP. Incorporate a range of possible approaches, such as transitioning densities with larger lots, clustering higher intensity housing units away from the shared edge of the RNP, requiring similar building heights and orientations, or a combination of these and other appropriate strategies.

POLICY 1.5.3: RURAL USES AND ACTIVITIES

Continue to support activities and uses related to the raising and keeping of animals for personal enjoyment or food production in RNP areas in accordance with the Unified Development Code (Title 30).

Goal 1.6: Protect the character, identity, and economic viability of the County’s outlying communities

POLICY 1.6.1: AREA-SPECIFIC POLICIES

Review all proposed projects in outlying communities through the lens of the area-specific policies contained in this Master Plan. Support efforts by outlying communities to protect and enhance their unique histories, economic drivers, agriculture or ranching heritage, recreational, ecotourism potential, or other character-defining features.

POLICY 1.6.2: LAND USE PLANNING

Address the unique land use considerations for outlying communities in Clark County through periodic updates to planning area land use plans and the application of tailored development regulations where appropriate.

POLICY 1.6.3: ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY

Support opportunities for local economic development in outlying communities.

⬚ figure

Goal 1.7: Protect Clark County’s historic, cultural, and archaeological resources

POLICY 1.7.1: RESOURCE IDENTIFICATION AND PROTECTION

Cooperate with local preservation non-profits, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), the National Park Service (NPS), and others to further efforts at identifying and protecting sites within the county that have historic, cultural, or archaeological significance.

POLICY 1.7.2: EDUCATION

Broaden the public’s awareness and understanding of the economic, social, and environmental benefits of preserving historic, cultural, and archaeological resources in the county.

POLICY 1.7.3: DOCUMENTATION AND INTERPRETATION

Encourage efforts at the community, state, or federal level to expand documentation of historic, cultural, and archaeological resources in Clark County.

POLICY 1.7.4: HISTORIC RESOURCES

Encourage the preservation and/or adaptive reuse of existing buildings, structures, or sites determined to be eligible for the State or National Register of Historic Places.

POLICY 1.7.5: HISTORIC DESIGNATION

Support the expansion of the County’s list of Historic Designations, as well as the addition of buildings, structures, or sites to the State and National Register of Historic Places.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

Historical Markers

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

Designated Historic Properties

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

Relationship to the County’s All-In Sustainability and Climate Action Plan

The goals and policies of Core Value 1 promote a more sustainable and resilient Clark County by:

• Encouraging development along high-frequency transit corridors;
• Supporting the establishment of neighborhood-serving commercial centers near where people live;
• Focusing on the rehabilitation and preservation of existing housing and structures;
• Encouraging infill development; and
• Improving connections between neighborhoods.

⬚ figure

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

CORE VALUE 2: EQUITABLE ACCESS TO PROGRAMS, SERVICES, AND AMENITIES

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

Where are we today?

Clark County offers many services, programs, and amenities that contribute to the high quality of life that residents enjoy. There are great libraries, excellent parks, recreational and enrichment programs, clean and safe streets, and support services for vulnerable populations. However, many of these services are not available in the areas where they are needed most. At over 8,000 square miles—roughly the same size as New Jersey—the county is vast and bridging the distances can be a struggle for residents whose incomes and transportation options are limited. In addition, new neighborhoods in unincorporated Clark County, in most cases, are built without the types of basic amenities and services that residents desire—such as parks and common open spaces. This practice has emphasized inequalities by geography and income level that will be amplified by the effects of extreme heat and other effects of climate change.

While there are numerous existing amenities that residents enjoy, many agree on one that is lacking: a local arts and culture scene. Casinos routinely bring national acts and blockbuster exhibitions to the area, but residents would like to see a stronger focus on local, small-scale community spaces to create and share art, music, theatre, and other creative pursuits of their own.

In 2050, Clark County is a place where...

• Every neighborhood and community in Clark County have access to high-quality amenities including libraries, recreational and senior centers, swimming pools, parks, trails, and open spaces;
• Every resident can access the health and human services they need, without regard to income, age, or ability, and in close proximity to their home; and
• A vibrant local arts, culture, and entertainment scene thrives alongside the national acts and venues the Las Vegas Valley is known for.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

⬚ figure

CV 2: EQUITABLE ACCESS TO PROGRAMS, SERVICES, AND AMENITIES

Countywide Goals and Policies

Goal 2.1: Continue to expand the County’s parks, trails, and open space system at a level that is sustainable

POLICY 2.1.1: LEVELS OF SERVICE

Continue to plan for a mix of urban and rural area parks, trails, and open spaces at a scale and scope that matches the County’s capacity to sustain a high level of service over the long-term. Work to achieve optimal levels of service by type and location, as defined in Section 3: Growth Framework.

POLICY 2.1.2: EQUITABLE ACCESS

Consider health benefits, impacts, and service population needs in the design, location, and prioritization of new facilities or improvements to existing facilities. Prioritize system investment in areas or communities that are currently underserved, where barriers to access exist, or where existing facilities are not projected to meet future needs.

POLICY 2.1.3: TRAIL SITING

Minimize recreational trail operation and maintenance costs through efficient siting, design, and construction. Prioritize trails and trailheads in locations that:

• Connect or provide access to existing parks, trails, and recreational facilities;
• Are located within public rights-of-way/public lands, along natural washes, flood control facilities, and public utility corridors;
• Improve connectivity to trails in adjacent municipalities; and
• Encourage multiple uses and provide access to public lands where appropriate.

Major Regional Initiatives

Neon to Nature. Part of Southern Nevada Health District’s (SNHD) “Get Healthy Clark County” initiative, Neon to Nature is an online tool or mobile app that enables county residents and visitors to find information about the 1,000+ miles of walking and bicycle trails throughout Southern Nevada. Each trail listing includes trail information and photos, along with maps of each trail’s location, length, and amenities.

Vegas Valley Rim Trail. The Vegas Valley Rim Trail is a grand vision for a 100+ mile trail that, once complete, will circle the periphery of the Las Vegas Valley. The Rim Trail passes through unincorporated Clark County and the cities of Las Vegas, Henderson, and North Las Vegas. Portions of the trail already exist, and work is being done to link the discrete sections together, as well as to link to other completed trail networks, including the 35 miles of Las Vegas Wash trails. In addition to the County and cities, there are many partners working to make the trail a reality, including Get Outdoors Nevada, the NPS, the BLM, the Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition (SNRPC), and the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC).

POLICY 2.1.4: ACCESS AND USES

Designate areas where non-motorized users can experience and enjoy access to open lands and promote responsible use of off-highway vehicles (OHVs) in designated areas.[See also, Goal 3.5, Manage access to public lands to balance habitat, recreational, environmental, aesthetic, and economic value, and supporting policies]

CV 2: EQUITABLE ACCESS TO PROGRAMS, SERVICES, AND AMENITIES

⬚ figure

POLICY 2.1.5: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Establish clear expectations for the provision of recreational amenities in new development to include parks, active and passive open space, and connections to adjacent properties, public lands, trail systems, and park facilities.

POLICY 2.1.6: OPEN SPACE

Seek opportunities to protect distinctive topographic features for parks and open space through purchase, preservation, or dedication. Encourage new development to provide and maintain access to public lands through access easements and trail connections.

POLICY 2.1.7: SUSTAINABLE PARK DESIGN

Incorporate sustainable concepts such as water conservation, solar and energy efficient lighting, and cooling centers and drinking water in new parks and facilities, as well as for park retrofits and additions. Coordinate with appropriate agencies and departments to provide public access to cooling centers and drinking water.

POLICY 2.1.8: REGIONAL AND STATE SYSTEM

Continue to work with adjacent cities, federal agencies, and other state and regional partners on the implementation of collaborative projects and plans that support the enhancement of the open space and trail system throughout Clark County.

Goal 2.2: All residents in Clark County have access to high-quality programs and amenities

POLICY 2.2.1: PROGRAMMING

Continue to provide a range of recreational, educational, enrichment, and special interest programs to meet the diverse interests, ages, and needs of residents throughout Clark County.

⬚ figure

POLICY 2.2.2: LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE

Establish thresholds for adequate on-going maintenance of existing facilities and ensure the availability of adequate funding for the long-term upkeep of the facilities. Implement regular monitoring to ascertain that levels of maintenance are adequate to level of use and demand for facilities.

POLICY 2.2.3: FACILITY EXPANSION/ NEW FACILITIES

Plan proactively for expansion of existing facilities and provision of new ones to meet increases in demand and accommodate anticipated population growth. Incorporate considerations for a changing climate into facility siting, design, and upgrades.

POLICY 2.2.4: MULTI-PURPOSE FACILITIES

Seek opportunities to develop and maintain multi-purpose, multi-generational, and/or other types of shared-use facilities (e.g., school recreational facilities, parks, community meeting space, libraries, and museums) in order to efficiently locate community and recreational facilities and programs and leverage available funding.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

Clark County Trails Map - Las Vegas Valley

⬚ figure

Clark County Trails Map - Las Vegas Valley

⬚ figure

0 2.3 4.5 9 Miles

Adopted Date: November 17, 2021 Amended Date: January 18, 2023 CLARK COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING

Goal 2.3: All Clark County residents have access to the high-quality health and social services they need

POLICY 2.3.1: PROGRAMMING

Continue to support public health education and information dissemination initiatives that contribute to the health, quality of life, and well-being of all residents of Clark County.

POLICY 2.3.2: COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Support on-going efforts of the SNHD to address the prioritized list of needs identified in the Clark County Community Health Needs Assessment which include access to care, relief from extreme heat, motor vehicle and pedestrian safety, violence prevention, substance use, and mental health.

POLICY 2.3.3: SERVICES FOR VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

Work with partner agencies that focus on homelessness prevention and assistance, and other entities that assist seniors, disabled, or other at-risk populations to ensure efficient provision of services, seamless networks of support, and preparedness for more extreme heat such as access to cooling spaces and drinking water.

POLICY 2.3.4: INFORMATION SHARING

Collaborate with internal and external County service providers on planning, information sharing, and service delivery. Ensure efficient referrals and interactions with the public seeking services by ensuring each department has a current and complete awareness of other departments’ programs and services.

POLICY 2.3.5: FUNDING SOURCES

Continue with the identification of adequate, stable funding sources that allow service providers to meet the present level of demand for service among at-risk, homeless, and other vulnerable populations. Anticipate or respond to increases in the demand for services by identifying the means and funding to meet increased need to the maximum extent possible.

POLICY 2.3.6: ACCESS TO SERVICES

Coordinate with RTC and other regional partners on siting of future health and human service facilities to encourage a more uniform distribution of specialized services in unincorporated Clark County and encourage compact land use patterns and a mix of uses in locations that have or are planned for high frequency transit. [See also, Core Value 4, A More Connected Clark County]

⬚ figure

Human Service Providers in Clark County

Several County departments—and numerous external partners—are involved in social services provisions in the County. The Clark County Social Service (CCSS) department is central to the County’s efforts to provide services for seniors, persons with disabilities, and disadvantaged residents, while Parks & Recreation, through its cultural division and community centers, provides educational, recreational, and cultural programming. The County also collaborates with other jurisdictions on matters of health, housing, and transportation, by participating in the SNHD, the Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority (SNRHA), and RTC, Southern Nevada’s Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). Beyond County government and intergovernmental agencies, the County also collaborates with non-profits, faith-based service providers, and private agencies engaged in human service provision.

POLICY 2.3.7: COOLING SPACES AND DRINKING WATER

Support a network of publicly accessible cooling centers and drinking water access points such as parks and recreational facilities, community centers, libraries, and other air-conditioned spaces, prioritizing locations in areas with the most heat exposure and need for relief from extreme heat. Develop public outreach strategies to promote access to cooling centers and drinking water locations and coordinate with public transportation providers and community partners to share transportation options, focusing outreach to those communities most vulnerable to extreme heat.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

Goal 2.4: Continue to foster a supportive environment for local arts, culture, and entertainment

POLICY 2.4.1: LOCAL ARTS & CULTURE

Continue to provide opportunities to use public facilities, such as parks, the Clark County Government Center Amphitheatre, community centers, senior centers, libraries, and museums as spaces to create and showcase local contributions to arts, music, and culture.

POLICY 2.4.2: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

Encourage community support for and participation in opportunities to display and perform locally-created exhibits and productions.

POLICY 2.4.3: PUBLIC ART

Continue to support the County’s Art fund, and the work of the Clark County Art Committee in publicizing calls for public art proposals and on-going installation of exhibits. Seek opportunities to incorporate art into public projects and encourage inclusion of artistic features in private developments as well.

POLICY 2.4.4: NATIONAL ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT

Support continued efforts by casinos, non-profits, and other groups to bring national entertainment and cultural events to destinations and venues throughout Clark County.

Relationship to the County’s All-In Sustainability and Climate Action Plan

The goals and policies of Core Value 2 support a more sustainable and resilient Clark County by:

• Expanding parks, trails, and open space as communities grow;
• Encouraging parks, trails, and open space to be sustainably designed;
• Prioritizing equitable access to parks, trails, open space, public services, and amenities; and
• Integrating local arts, culture, and entertainment into the community.

🟢 Directly Supports ⚪ Indirectly Supports

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

CORE VALUE 3: A HEALTHY AND SUSTAINABLE NATURAL AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

Where are we today?

Clark County boasts some of the most unique geography anywhere in the world, and residents are well aware of their good fortune in this respect. From the heights of Mount Charleston and Red Rock Canyon to the depths of the Colorado River, from the modest confines of Siegfried & Roy Park to the vast expanse of Lake Mead, residents cite the ready access to parks, public lands, and outdoor recreation areas as one of the strongest “positives” of living in the county. While enjoying the natural assets of the county, residents are also keenly aware of the importance of being respectful stewards of the environment.

Managing resource use is one frequently cited concern allied closely with the need to preserve existing open spaces from encroachment. Residents have witnessed recent growth that brings development to the very perimeter of open spaces, and while regional growth is forecasted to continue at a slower pace, they are conscious of the need to act now to balance future expansion with conservation. The desired outcomes include growth centered in existing urban areas; compact, mixed use communities that allow a reduction in carbon footprints; and an increased emphasis on sustainable development practices.

There is also concern over how climate change is—and will increasingly—affect county communities and vulnerable residents, but there is agreement that present actions can mitigate future impacts. Residents want to undertake measures to ensure the continued viability of natural resources and the environment so that ensuing generations can benefit from the same assets we enjoy today.

As the supply of vacant land within the Las Vegas Valley diminishes, collaboration with the federal partners who manage much of the land within County borders becomes ever more important.

In 2050, Clark County is a place where...

• Deliberate steps taken in the past have made Clark County more resilient to the effects of extreme heat, drought, and other effects of climate change;
• The built environment has been constructed or retrofitted to diminish intensity of resource use, reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, and increase its resilience to changing climate conditions; and
• Through continued efforts and deliberate focus on compact, sustainable development and low-impact lifestyles, we are able to pass on to the next generation a healthy natural environment.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

⬚ figure

CV 3: A HEALTHY AND SUSTAINABLE NATURAL AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT

Countywide Goals and Policies

Goal 3.1: Maintain air quality at a level that protects public health and improves visual clarity

POLICY 3.1.1: PRIORITY AIR POLLUTANTS

Monitor air quality conditions and pursue a variety of strategies to reduce priority air pollutants and associated health impacts as identified by the County’s All-In Sustainability and Climate Action Plan.

POLICY 3.1.2: TRANSPORTATION-RELATED EMISSIONS

Pursue a variety of strategies to reduce reliance on private automobile travel, with the goal of reducing fossil fuel consumption and associated pollutant emissions from vehicles, including efforts to encourage use of electronic vehicles and increase higher-density and transit-oriented development in urban areas of the Las Vegas Valley. [See also, Goal 4.1, Encourage the expansion and use of multimodal transportation options throughout Clark County, and related policies]

Goal 3.2: Support County and state efforts to expand the use of clean energy and achieve GHG reduction targets

POLICY 3.2.1: CLEAN ENERGY

Encourage the use of non-fossil fuels and renewable sources of energy in new development and pursue a variety of strategies to reduce energy consumption in existing development. [See also, Goal 3.6, Focus on incorporating enhanced sustainability and resilience practices into the built environment, and supporting policies.]

POLICY 3.2.2: FACILITY SITING

Support the expansion of locally-produced renewable/alternative energy to serve Southern Nevada by allowing for the construction and expansion of clean power generating and distribution facilities at a variety of scales.

POLICY 3.2.3: ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Implement measures for the reduction of energy consumption and promotion of energy conservation in Clark County operations, as identified in the County’s All-In Sustainability and Climate Action Plan. [See also, Goal 3.6, Focus on incorporating enhanced sustainability and resilience practices into the built environment, and supporting policies.]

POLICY 3.2.4: EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

Facilitate the expanded use of electric and alternative fuel vehicles and other emerging technologies that support the County’s sustainability goals.

POLICY 3.2.5: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Encourage growth that is sustainable for the region, is in alignment with GHG reduction targets, and takes future climate impacts into consideration.

Goal 3.3: Maintain and protect the quality, supply, and reliability of Clark County’s water resources for current and future residents

POLICY 3.3.1: WATER RESOURCES

Continue to support Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) efforts and plans to meet current and projected water demands, encourage water conservation, and implement adaptive management strategies.

⬚ figure

POLICY 3.3.2: WATER CONSERVATION

Coordinate with partner agencies on educational, programmatic, and regulatory strategies to increase water conservation projects and programs throughout Clark County. Utilize the SNWA Joint Water Conservation Plan to ensure conservation opportunities are optimized and reinforced.

POLICY 3.3.3: WATER QUALITY

Continue to implement an integrated, area-wide water quality management program in accordance with the Clark County 208 Area-Wide Water Quality Management Plan (208 WQMP) and related plans and studies.

POLICY 3.3.4: WASH PROTECTION AND RESTORATION PROGRAMS

Encourage preservation and protection of natural washes and waterways through measures that can improve the quality of water that enters Lake Mead. Utilize the Las Vegas Wash Comprehensive Adaptive Management Plan and related plans and studies to ensure land use compatibility with the Clark County Wetlands Park and associated wash improvements.

POLICY 3.3.5: IMPAIRED WATER BODIES

Support efforts to restore water quality to levels that allow impaired lakes, streams, and washes to be removed from the State of Nevada’s List of Impaired Rivers.

POLICY 3.3.6: AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITY

Encourage the use of vegetative or constructive buffering surrounding area landscapes and farmland to limit the amount of wind erosion and irrigation runoff and protect water quality.

POLICY 3.3.7: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Focus on maintaining quality of groundwater and public water bodies (e.g., lakes and rivers) with efforts to reduce untreated stormwater runoff through expanded use of catchment techniques, green infrastructure, vegetative buffers, regular maintenance of stormwater infrastructure, and continued compliance with the County’s Joint National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit (Stormwater Permit).

Water Resources Management

The sustainable management of Southern Nevada’s water resources is critical to the continued vitality of the region. Clark County works with a variety of partners to protect the quality, supply, and reliability of Clark County’s water resources for current and future residents. An overview of some of the major initiatives that help support the implementation of Goal 3.3 is provided in Section 3, Growth Framework. These initiatives include the SNWA Water Resources Plan, SNWA Water Conservation Plan, and Clark County 208 Water Quality Management Plan.

These ongoing initiatives reflect just some of the ongoing efforts by Clark County and its many regional partners to adapt growth-related policies and regulations to improve the resilience of Southern Nevada in the face of a changing climate.

POLICY 3.3.8: FLOOD CONTROL

Coordinate with the Regional Flood Control District (RFCD) on efforts to control localized flooding.

POLICY 3.3.9: GROUNDWATER PROTECTION

Explore land use and vegetation management practices that protect from aquifer contamination, support the proper abandonment of water wells, coordinate the implementation of the 208 WQMP, and support source water protection.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

POLICY 3.3.10: GROUNDWATER RESOURCES

Support initiatives to divert potentially overtaxing, harmful, or inappropriate development away from areas reaching water availability limits or with high groundwater recharge potential and to expand return flows to the Colorado River.

POLICY 3.3.11: SEWER AVAILABILITY

Limit the density of development in areas that do not or are not planned to have access to public wastewater facilities. Require residential development to connect to public sewer systems where these are available and put in place a plan to assist with conversion from individual septic where sewer service has expanded or will expand.

Goal 3.4: Reduce quantities of landfilled waste, potentially extending the operational life of current landfill sites within Clark County

POLICY 3.4.1: RECYCLING

Work with service providers to expand recycling rates within the Las Vegas Valley through wider implementation of curbside recycling programs, to include commercial and multi-family development, and other strategies as appropriate.

POLICY 3.4.2: WASTE DIVERSION

Encourage the adaptive reuse of existing buildings, the incorporation of recycled building materials, and other strategies to divert waste generated by construction, demolition, and renovation from landfills, subject to NRS and Southern Nevada Health District requirements.

POLICY 3.4.3: FOOD DIVERSION

Encourage regional and state efforts to divert food from banquets/casino events, restaurants, grocery stores, schools, vendors, and manufacturers that would otherwise be destined for the landfill for distribution to those in need. [See also, Goal 2.3, All Clark County residents have access to the high-quality health and social services they need, and supporting policies]

Goal 3.5: Manage access to public lands to balance habitat, recreational, environmental, aesthetic, and economic value

POLICY 3.5.1: APPROPRIATE USES

Encourage multiple uses on open lands unless activities could pose a detriment to natural resources and habitats, or long-term health of the land.

⬚ figure

POLICY 3.5.2: STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS

Continue to maintain compliance with state and federal regulations, such as the ESA, Clean Water mandates, Nevada laws regarding critically endangered plant species, and all other applicable laws and regulations, when non-federal development activity occurs.

POLICY 3.5.3: DESERT CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Continue administration of the Desert Conservation Program and the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Program (MSHCP) to ensure a balance between development and species conservation.

POLICY 3.5.4: INVASIVE SPECIES

Actively plan for the prevention, eradication, and management of noxious weeds and invasive species in natural areas.

Desert Conservation Program

Clark County’s Desert Conservation Program helps to ensure that species covered under the ESA can continue to survive in the wild by maintaining habitat for them. The program also allows for development, through an incidental take program. An incidental take is an otherwise legal action—such as development and construction—that disturbs the habitat in which protected species reside. The County has secured a permit from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) allowing for the disturbance of up to 145,000 acres through incidental take. A fee paid by the developer or construction company is required for any disturbance activity, and the fee is used for the acquisition of sensitive habitats, habitat restoration, public information and education, research, the Wild Desert Tortoise Assistance Line and installation and maintenance of fencing along roadways to reduce tortoise mortality. In addition to the desert tortoise, there are 77 other species that are protected through the Desert Conservation Program.

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

Goal 3.6: Incorporate enhanced sustainability and resilience practices into the built environment

POLICY 3.6.1: URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT

Mitigate the urban heat island effect in existing and new development through site and building features that provide shade, increase urban tree canopies, reduce the footprint of hardscaped areas, and otherwise help to reduce heat absorption by exterior surfaces.

POLICY 3.6.2: COMPACT, MIXED-USE, AND TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

Encourage compact, mixed-use, and transit-oriented development, or any combination thereof, in locations that will lessen reliance on automobiles as the primary means of access to necessary services and encourage reduction in vehicle miles traveled. [See also, Goal 4.1, Encourage the expansion and use of multimodal transportation options throughout Clark County, and related policies]

POLICY 3.6.3: GREEN BUILDING

Reduce energy consumption by encouraging the integration of passive heating and cooling principles, superior insulation, energy efficient windows, use of environmentally-certified materials, and other techniques that improve energy efficiency in the design of new homes and buildings. Prioritize the use of incentives for net zero development.

POLICY 3.6.4: WATER RECYCLING

Encourage the reuse of treated effluent for area green space including, but not limited to, parks and golf courses.

POLICY 3.6.5: DROUGHT-TOLERANT LANDSCAPING

Using the SNRPC Plant List as a guide for appropriate plant choices, encourage the use of drought-tolerant, climate resilient, and desert-appropriate landscaping and the use of and irrigation systems that are designed for maximum water use efficiency.

POLICY 3.6.6: MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION

Prioritize efforts to reduce transportation-related carbon emissions through expanded and inter-connected multi-modal transportation options. [See also, Goal 4.1, Encourage the expansion and use of multimodal transportation options throughout Clark County, and related policies]

POLICY 3.6.7: GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE

Encourage the inclusion of green infrastructure such as rain gardens, permeable pavers, infiltration planters, and rainwater harvesting systems to larger scale infrastructure investments including pervious pavement with infiltration, vegetated swales, green roofs, bioretention, and grey water recycling systems.

POLICY 3.6.8: TRANSMISSION CAPABILITY

Encourage the development of transmission capability and interconnectivity for distributed energy, cogeneration and alternative energy sources, including regional interconnectivity and transmission capability.

Relationship to the County’s All-In Sustainability and Climate Action Plan

The goals and policies of Core Value 3 support a more sustainable and resilient Clark County by:

• Maintaining and improving air and water quality;
• Expanding the use of clean energy;
• Reducing landfilled waste;
• Protecting public lands and the natural environment; and
• Incorporating sustainability and resilience practices into the built environment.

⬚ figure

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

CORE VALUE 4: A MORE CONNECTED CLARK COUNTY

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

Where are we today?

Connectivity in this context refers to both the physical aspects as they relate to transportation and mobility—and the less tangible aspects—as they relate to governance and community.

From a physical standpoint, many residents struggle to get where they need to go in Clark County without an automobile. Residents have appreciated seeing new infrastructure with shared space, allowing cars to travel alongside bicyclists, pedestrians, and public transportation. They would like to see this trend continue by focusing on efforts to connect existing trails, bike lanes and pedestrian facilities, along with expanding public transportation. As with many County initiatives, efforts at expanding transportation networks cross boundaries and jurisdictional lines which makes interagency collaboration in this area central to accomplishing these goals.

From a governance standpoint, connectivity refers to transparency, community engagement, and a focus on regional collaboration. Residents express the desire for County government to provide timely information, to make decisions consistent with adopted goals and policies, and to allow for meaningful opportunities for citizen participation.

Lastly, connectivity refers to residents’ desire to foster a collective sense of community in Clark County. Living in Searchlight is, of course, different from living in Summerlin South, but these places are connected through the people who call them home. These people are friends, neighbors, relatives, and coworkers who are connected in countless different ways. Fostering a sense of community among these diverse people and places is achieved by embracing and working toward a common set of goals for the County as a whole.

In 2050, Clark County is a place where...

• Sidewalks, high comfort bike facilities, trails and transit form a seamless, integrated network within and to major destinations in Clark County;
• County government is part of a well-established network of service providers and support agencies all collaborating to provide the best service and most efficient government possible;
• Effective government serves as the basis for transparent information sharing and predictable decision-making, while allowing meaningful opportunities for community input; and
• People have strong connections to their communities, to shared values, and to one another.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

⬚ figure

CV 4: A MORE CONNECTED CLARK COUNTY

Countywide Goals and Policies

Goal 4.1: Encourage the expansion and use of multimodal transportation options throughout Clark County

POLICY 4.1.1: REGIONAL HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT SYSTEM

Support efforts to provide faster, cleaner, more frequent, more equitable, and more convenient transit service to and from major destinations within the region through the phased implementation of the High-Capacity Transit network. Align land use and transportation decisions in unincorporated Clark County with recommendations contained in RTC’s On Board Mobility Plan and subsequent implementation documents.

POLICY 4.1.2: TRANSIT COVERAGE – LAS VEGAS VALLEY

Support efforts by RTC to enhance, redistribute, and/or expand service hours, coverage, and frequency to maximize access to jobs and housing, make short trips easier, better address the needs of underserved or transit-dependent populations, and connect major destinations in unincorporated Clark County with other destinations throughout the Las Vegas Valley.

POLICY 4.1.3: TRANSIT COVERAGE – OUTLYING COMMUNITIES

Support efforts by the Southern Nevada Transit Coalition (SNTC) to sustain and enhance Silver Rider Transit service for the rural parts of Clark County.

POLICY 4.1.4: MICROTRANSIT

Support efforts by RTC and partners to expand on-demand transit service in underserved areas of Clark County.

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

Proposed Southern Nevada High-Capacity Transit System

⬚ figure

LEGEND

⬚ figure

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

⬚ figure

POLICY 4.1.5: HIGH-SPEED PASSENGER RAIL

Support efforts to explore the future potential for high-speed passenger rail service between Las Vegas and Southern California.

POLICY 4.1.6: BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY

Support the implementation of the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for Southern Nevada by:

• Planning and implementing incremental improvements to existing roadways and trails in unincorporated Clark County to improve safety and connectivity for all modes, and people of all ages and abilities;
• Prioritizing the installation of pedestrian, equestrian, and high comfort bicycle facilities in areas of unincorporated Clark County that are currently underserved, contain, or are planned for—land uses or transportation facilities that generate high levels of activity, or where “gaps” between existing segments of sidewalks, trails, or bike lanes exist; and
• Adopting stronger, context-sensitive connectivity standards for future development and redevelopment.

POLICY 4.1.7: COMPLETE STREETS

Seek opportunities to integrate Complete Streets attributes as part of County infrastructure projects to the maximum extent practicable as a means to reduce traffic congestion, improve air and water quality, and increase the quality of life of residents by providing safe, convenient, and comfortable routes for walking, bicycling, public transportation, and driving.

⬚ figure

What is a Complete Street?

Complete Streets are roadways designed to accommodate all users safely and comfortably, regardless of age, ability, or mode of transportation. Users include motorists, cyclists, pedestrians, and all vehicle types, including public transportation, emergency responders, and freight and delivery trucks, among others. In addition to providing safety and access for all users, Complete Street design treatments take into account accommodations for disabled persons as required by the ADA. Design considerations for connectivity and access management are also taken into account for non-motorized users of the facility. (Source: RTC Policy for Complete Streets)

POLICY 4.1.8: SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

In coordination with Clark County School District (CCSD), support Safe Routes to Schools programs as a way to reduce vehicular congestion in school zones and create safe and inviting environments for students, families, and staff to walk, bicycle, and use public transportation to travel to and from school.

Goal 4.2: Actively manage the transportation system to improve reliability, efficiency, and safety

POLICY 4.2.1: FREEWAYS

Collaborate with the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT), RTC, and other regional partners on efforts to implement projects and programs that result in a more efficient freeway system, and support reductions in travel demand, air pollution, energy consumption, and infrastructure needs.

POLICY 4.2.2: ROADWAY DESIGN AND CLASSIFICATION

Ensure the identified functional class, right-of-way, design, capacity, and level of service of transportation facilities are consistent in supporting existing and future land use development patterns and climate goals.

POLICY 4.2.3: RIGHT-OF-WAY PRESERVATION

Support the identification and retention of rights-of-way for future roadways, fixed guideway systems, or other transportation facilities identified in adopted plans. Discourage the vacation of existing, or elimination of planned, rights-of-way unless alternative multimodal connections exist or can be provided in the vicinity.

POLICY 4.2.4: ACCESS MANAGEMENT

Limit driveway frequencies on arterial and collector streets in accordance with the RTC Clark County Area Access Management Plan.

POLICY 4.2.5: TRAFFIC CALMING

Encourage the use of context-sensitive traffic calming measures, such as roundabouts and road diets, in appropriate locations to reduce vehicle speeds, discourage shortcutting traffic, increase safety, and enhance the livability of neighborhoods and communities.

POLICY 4.2.6: FREIGHT NETWORK

Support efforts to enhance connectivity between truck, rail, and air transport to support the efficient movement of goods in and through Clark County. Support development that is compatible with freight operations to protect existing uses and maintain opportunities for future expansion of employment and industrial land uses in areas with desirable freight access. [See also, Core Value 5, A Diverse and Resilient Economy]

Goal 4.3: Support regional and interagency collaboration

POLICY 4.3.1: REGIONAL PLANNING

Continue participation in regional planning efforts, working alongside partner agencies to pursue shared goals related to growth management, infrastructure, affordable housing, economic development, social service provision, transportation, resource conservation, sustainability, and other issues of mutual importance within the Las Vegas Valley.

POLICY 4.3.2: SERVICE PROVIDERS

Continually seek opportunities to gain efficiency and efficacy in the delivery of County services, working with partner organizations and service providers to understand core strengths, capacities, and initiatives, better plan for coordinated service provision, and avoid the duplication of efforts.

POLICY 4.3.3: INTERAGENCY COORDINATION

Work with regional, state, and federal agencies to develop coordinated plans and regulations, prioritize inter-jurisdictional infrastructure improvements, develop coalitions to finance and implement needed improvements, and address other issues of mutual importance.

POLICY 4.3.4: LOCAL PLANS AND POLICIES

Actively participate in planning efforts led by the incorporated cities to encourage consistency with Clark County policies and regulations and identify opportunities for partnerships.

POLICY 4.3.5: INFORMATION SHARING

Facilitate improved interagency communication, encourage the exchange of information, and encourage resource sharing between Clark County and its regional, state, and federal agency partners.

POLICY 4.3.6: FEDERAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Strive for consistency between Clark County’s Master Plan and Title 30 and federal land management plans through on-going coordination with federal land management agencies.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

⬚ figure

Goal 4.4: Foster a culture of transparent and inclusive County government

POLICY 4.4.1: MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Incorporate the Master Plan into County capital improvement planning (CIP), departmental work programs, and decision-making at all levels to encourage consistency and continuity as elected officials and staff change over time.

POLICY 4.4.2: GEOGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION

Evaluate projects, proposals, and investments in the context of both countywide and area-specific interests, as expressed through the goals and policies of this Master Plan and supporting land use plans. Strive to ensure that the benefits resulting from a particular decision are fairly shared, and that any burdens or negative impacts do not disproportionately affect a particular group or location in the County.

POLICY 4.4.3: COUNTY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

Strive to reflect the diversity of the County in the membership of volunteer boards and commissions, including but not limited to people of different genders, races, ethnicities, income levels, ages, backgrounds, and occupational experience.

⬚ figure

POLICY 4.4.4: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Encourage fair and equitable participation in County processes and public hearings through focused efforts to engage all members of communities including typically hard to reach constituent groups.

POLICY 4.4.5: INCLUSIVE ENGAGEMENT

Seek to engage with a broad spectrum of the community during all County-led outreach efforts. This includes residents and businesses from different ages, racial backgrounds, education levels, and income levels, as well as those who face other barriers to participating in engagement activities.

POLICY 4.4.6: COMMUNICATIONS

Continue to use a range of tools, techniques, and technologies to disseminate timely information to Clark County residents and other interested parties, and encourage participation in County-sponsored events and processes.

Relationship to the County’s All-In Sustainability and Climate Action Plan

The goals and policies of Core Value 4 support a more sustainable and resilient Clark County by:

• Expanding access to alternative forms of transportation;
• Improving reliability, efficiency, and safety of transportation system; and
• Encouraging regional collaboration, transparency, and inclusiveness of local government.

🟢 Directly Supports ⚪ Indirectly Supports

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

CORE VALUE 5: A DIVERSE AND RESILIENT ECONOMY

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

Where are we today?

Clark County is home to one of the most popular tourist destinations in the world—the Las Vegas Strip—with its endless variety of hotels, casinos, restaurants, shows and attractions. The county plays host to the world, but this strength in the travel and tourism industries can also be a vulnerability: a highly concentrated economic base is subject to particularly severe shocks when its main industries are affected. This was clear during the Great Recession of 2008 when the county’s economic recovery lagged that of other parts of the country, and the Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought home this difficult lesson once again.

Residents hope that as the pandemic subsides, tourism and entertainment recover their central place in the economy, but they are even more acutely aware of the benefits to be gained from diversifying the region’s base economic industries. Expanding the employment mix can make the area more resilient to withstand any future downturns the economy experiences.

A related concern is for the county to attract industries that provide higher base wages than service industries typically offer. Some such industries, like health care, are growing in the area, and residents recognize that efforts to attract a broader industry base relies on having a workforce with the educational background and contemporary skills to fill the jobs offered. Another element to attracting new industries to the county involves making sure there is space for them to locate by preserving employment land, whether for commerce or industry, and fostering a business climate that makes setting a up new business easy and straightforward to accomplish.

In 2050, Clark County is a place where...

• Defined employment centers, diverse housing options for workers, supportive regulations, and a high quality of life in unincorporated Clark County have helped attract new industry, by providing space for new industries to locate;
• An economy distributed across many industries is stronger and more resilient to withstand periodic downturns; and
• Diverse industries offer living wages for the residents who work within them.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

⬚ figure

CV 5: A DIVERSE AND RESILIENT ECONOMY

Countywide Goals and Policies

Goal 5.1: Encourage diversification of the economic base to enhance resilience

POLICY 5.1.1: COUNTY-FOCUSED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Adopt and maintain an economic development strategy for County-led efforts that articulates Clark County’s near- and long-term economic development priorities within the Las Vegas Valley and for the county as a whole.

POLICY 5.1.2: STATE AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES

Actively participate in state and regional economic development initiatives led by the Governor’s Office of Economic Development (GOED), the Las Vegas Global Economic Alliance (LVGEA), and others that provide support and direction on issues of mutual importance.

POLICY 5.1.3: ECONOMIC BASE

Continue to emphasize tourism, conventions, trade shows, and gaming as one of the region’s economic pillars, while pursuing efforts to expand the presence of new and emerging sectors such as health care, technology, autonomous technology and vehicle systems, green industries, manufacturing, engineering, and others identified by the GOED, LVGEA, or the Clark County Economic Development Strategic Plan.

POLICY 5.1.4: REGIONAL OPPORTUNITY SITES

Continue to support land use patterns, partnerships, and other efforts that help advance Regional Opportunity Sites and other major efforts, such as the Las Vegas Medical District; Stadium District Development Plan; and Maryland Parkway Corridor Transit-Oriented Development Plan.

Economic Development Strategic Plan

Clark County’s Department of Community and Economic Development serves as the primary point of contact for companies looking to develop a new business, expand an existing business, or relocate a business to Clark County. An analysis of Clark County’s communities and economy was prepared on a parallel track with this Master Plan to help guide County-led community and economic development efforts within the region and across the county. The resulting Economic Development Strategic Plan established six broad goals:

1. Cultivate a Fertile Environment for Small Businesses and Entrepreneurs
2. Accelerate Economic Diversification
3. Integrate the Workforce Ecosystem
4. Mobilize Stakeholders around County-Wide Initiatives
5. Promote Community-Centered Design of the Build Environment
6. Ensure Equitable Access to Resources

Goals and policies in this Master Plan are intended to work hand-in-hand with the Economic Development Strategic Plan.

POLICY 5.1.5: REINVESTMENT

Encourage reinvestment in declining or vacant commercial centers through the adaptive reuse or redevelopment of blighted properties, and the introduction of a broader mix of uses (e.g., multi-family residential).

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

POLICY 5.1.6: OUTLYING COMMUNITIES

Collaborate with outlying communities in Clark County on the implementation of local and regional economic development goals particularly where targeted industry needs are better suited to locations within outlying communities.

Goal 5.2: Support continued improvements to and expansion of commercial airport operations in Clark County

POLICY 5.2.1: EXISTING PUBLIC-USE AIRPORTS

Minimize encroachment on operations at existing public-use airports throughout Clark County (as listed in Section 4) by restricting the expansion of land uses within the Airport Environs Overlay District (AEOD) and Airport Airspace Overlay District (AAOD) that are incompatible due to noise, safety, and other concerns, according to, at a minimum, guidance provided by federal agencies. [See also, Section 3: Growth Framework, Airport Environs]

POLICY 5.2.2: SOUTHERN NEVADA SUPPLEMENTAL AIRPORT

Continue to work with the BLM and other federal, state, and regional partners to plan for the development and conflict-free operation of the Southern Nevada Supplemental Airport (SNSA). Ensure future development on and in the vicinity of the airport site does not conflict with the compatibility area, retention basins, use of the transportation/utility corridor, or long-term plans for the facility and other potential aviation infrastructure.

POLICY 5.2.3: FUTURE AVIATION FACILITIES

Support long-term planning strategies for future aviation facilities needed to support the growing demand for alternative air transportation services, such as drones, new forms of air taxi services, or the non-urban heliport.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

⬚ figure

Goal 5.3: Support the military and the need for well-trained and prepared armed forces

POLICY 5.3.1: COMPATIBLE DEVELOPMENT

Cooperate with the U.S. Air Force (USAF) to reduce or mitigate development deemed incompatible with the mission of the military on and near Nellis Air Force Base, Creech Air Force Base, and the Nevada Test and Training Range.

POLICY 5.3.2: OVER FLIGHT AREAS

Support over flights where necessary and encourage the USAF to acquire lands in proximity to critical operation centers to ensure compatibility with existing land uses near USAF facilities.

POLICY 5.3.3: NELLIS COMPLEX COMPATIBLE USE PLAN

Support the strategies resulting from the Nellis Complex Compatible Use Plan to encourage compatible land uses around existing military installations and to support military operations.

⬚ figure

Goal 5.4: Support development of educational programs that prepare the workforce with the knowledge and skills to succeed

POLICY 5.4.1: EDUCATION

Support efforts at all levels of the education system that provide Clark County residents with the knowledge and skills needed in the modern workforce and encourage industries to hire from the local labor pool.

POLICY 5.4.2: VOCATIONAL TRAINING

Continue to work with state and regional partners to provide practical job training programs in skilled trades that enable participants to obtain stable, living-wage work in the county.

POLICY 5.4.3: SMALL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM

Continue to provide information, training, and other resources to help small businesses become competitive in their efforts to pursue and complete Clark County contracts.

Planned for Employment Areas

⬚ figure

Goal 5.5: Foster a business-friendly environment

POLICY 5.5.1: DESIGNATED EMPLOYMENT AREAS

Designate and support the development of industrial and employment uses in areas that are proximate to major air, rail, and highway facilities. Maintain the viability of designated employment areas by preventing encroachment from potentially incompatible uses or the conversion of employment-designated parcels to alternate uses.

POLICY 5.5.2: TECHNOLOGY

Continue to work with state and regional partners on the expansion of infrastructure, broadband access, and other technological enhancements that support the expansion of businesses throughout Clark County.

POLICY 5.5.3: SMALL AND LOCAL BUSINESSES

Encourage the retention and revitalization of established local business districts and the expansion of small businesses in unincorporated Clark County. [See also, Goal 1.6, Protect the character, identity, and economic viability of the County’s outlying communities, and supporting policies]

POLICY 5.5.4: DOWNTOWNS AND LOCAL BUSINESS DISTRICTS

Continue to work with the GOED, the LVGEA, and other partners to provide tools and technical assistance to enhance the economic vitality of downtowns and local business districts in the outlying communities. Encourage expanded participation in Nevada’s Main Street Communities program and other programs geared toward rural communities.

SECTION 2: COUNTYWIDE GOALS AND POLICIES

Relationship to the County’s All-In Sustainability and Climate Action Plan

The goals and policies of Core Value 5 support a more sustainable and resilient Clark County by:

• Supporting the diversification of the local economy;
• Improving coordination of land use with commercial airports and military facilities;
• Improving education and workforce development; and
• Retaining and supporting local businesses.

⬚ figure

(blank page)

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

⬚ figure