Public Meetings - Davis, California

The Davis City Council met on Tuesday, August 27, 2024, at 6:35 PM in the Community Chambers. The meeting covered a public hearing on the Oakshade Town Center Planned Development Amendment and Rezone, a review of alternatives for the Shriners Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR), consent calendar approvals, and public comments on tree ordinance enforcement. Key decisions included approval of the Oakshade amendments with a commitment to assess tree shade compliance, and direction to conduct deeper analysis on two EIR alternatives for the Shriners project. Consent Calendar - Item 3A: Approved Resolution awarding a contract to Carone & Company, Inc. for the 2024 Pavement Rehabilitation Project on Colusa Ave and Juniper Place (CIP ET8250), finding the project exempt from CEQA. - Item 3B: Approved Resolution increasing construction contingency for Yancy-Gwerder, Inc. for the Lake Terrace Sewer Relocation and Abandonment and Service Lateral CIPP Liner and Connection Seal – 2024 (CIP ET8166). - Item 3C: Approved Resolution approving the City of Davis HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and authorizing the City Manager to submit it to HUD. Councilmember Partida clarified that this is independent of the recent respite center funding decision. - Item 3D: Adopted second reading of an ordinance amending sections of Chapter 32 of the Davis Municipal Code (exempt from CEQA). - Item 3E: Adopted second reading of an ordinance clarifying provisions related to certain commissions in Chapters 6, 15, 22, and 29. - Item 3F: Adopted second reading of an ordinance adding Citywide Objective Design Standards for qualifying mixed-use and multi-family housing developments (exempt from CEQA). - Item 3G: Received informational minutes from the Historical Resources Management Commission meeting of February 26, 2024. - The consent calendar was approved unanimously (5-0) on a motion by Councilmember Partida, second by Vice Mayor Vaitla. Public Comments & Testimony - General Public Comment (Item 2): - Alan Hirsch, speaking for the city’s trees, expressed concern that new apartment complexes in South Davis lack sufficient tree spots to meet the 50% shade ordinance. He stated that the city’s methodology for calculating shade is inadequate and has not been updated for 15 years, despite three tree commission drafts that were not brought to council. He urged enforcement of existing tree laws. - Connor Gorman (individual) spoke in support of UC workers in contract negotiations, specifically UC librarians (UCAFT) and patient care/service workers (AFSME 3299), calling for community support. - Michael Shearer, retired certified arborist, urged the city council to enforce regulations requiring permits and evaluation before pruning or removing mature trees on multi-unit housing and parking lots, citing widespread destruction of mature trees in Davis. - Public Hearing on Oakshade Town Center (Item 4): - Jennifer Hess (Regency Centers) stated that the two vacant former junior anchor spaces (21,000 sq ft former Office Max and 17,000 sq ft former Rite Aid) are being marketed, but size restrictions in the current PD hamper leasing. She noted a signed lease contingent on removing the 15,000 sq ft cap and negotiations with the existing grocery store to expand into the former Rite Aid space. - Alan Hirsch repeated concerns about tree ordinance compliance at Oakshade, stating the site is in violation (50% shade in 50 years, but only 30 years in; dead/dying trees, no irrigation maintenance). He urged the council to enforce the law before approving the amendment. - Connor Gorman (pre-recorded) generally supported increased flexibility but stressed the need for a pharmacy and hoped for mixed-use residential if buildings are ever replaced. - Alan Pryor (pre-recorded) noted the shopping center is misnamed (no oaks, no shade) and urged the council to require full compliance with the parking lot tree ordinance. - Shriners Project EIR Alternatives (Item 5): - Alan Hirsch questioned the VMT per capita calculations, stating that density alone does not reduce VMT and that the preliminary estimates lack supporting data, making them unverifiable. He requested more transparency. - Connor Gorman (pre-recorded) supported higher density and a variety of alternatives. - Greg Crawford (individual) urged consideration of transit and alternative transportation to reduce VMT. - Ron (individual) noted that the EIR process is about studying alternatives and encouraged moving forward. - George Phillips (applicant’s representative) stated that the alternatives presented are more detailed than typical at this stage and urged the council to let the process proceed. - Long Range Calendar (Item 6B): - Alan Hirsch suggested updating standard conditions of approval to include stronger tree enforcement, modeled on the DISC development agreement. Discussion Items - Item 4 – Oakshade Town Center Planned Development Amendment and Rezone: - Staff (Principal Planner Dara Dungworth) presented the proposal to modify allowed uses, reclassify conditional uses, and remove size limits in the neighborhood commercial area. Planning Commission had recommended approval but moved residential and office uses back to conditional; staff recommended keeping them as permitted. The council discussed: - Councilmember Neville: Supported by-right residential and office uses to promote mixed use. - Vice Mayor Vaitla: Asked property owner about tree shade compliance. Jennifer Hess committed to conducting an arborist report, assessing deficiencies, and providing a timeline for remediation. - Councilmember Arnold: Questioned why other use changes (banks, movie theaters, more restaurants) were included now rather than in an omnibus ordinance. Staff explained this is a test case for a broader effort to update multiple shopping centers. Councilmember Arnold also emphasized the importance of retaining a pharmacy for the community. - Councilmember Partida: Supported the amendments and stressed the need for community gathering spaces beyond downtown. - City Attorney Inder Khalsa clarified that a zone change cannot be conditioned on tree compliance, but future building permits can require code compliance. Staff committed to peer review the arborist report and work with the owner on tree shade compliance. City Manager Mike Webb also committed to reinstituting 2x2 meetings with the Chamber of Commerce and DDBA. - Item 5 – Shriners Project EIR Alternatives Review: - Staff presented six revised preliminary alternative concepts: (1) No project; (2) Fewer units, same footprint; (3) Same units, smaller footprint (does not meet 15% VMT per capita reduction); (4) Smaller footprint, increased density (30% reduction); (5) Increased units, same footprint (28% reduction); (6) Off-site project. The council discussed VMT per capita methodology. Traffic consultant Greg Barons explained the difference between VMT per capita and total VMT. Vice Mayor Vaitla recommended deeper analysis on alternatives 4 and 5, which showed the greatest potential VMT reductions. Councilmember Neville asked about the baseline, and staff noted that the city has not adopted a local VMT threshold, relying on state guidelines and industry standards. The council agreed to proceed with the staff recommendation to do a deeper dive on alternatives 4 and 5. - Item 6A – AB 1234 Reporting: Councilmember Arnold reported a $300 city-paid expense for a SACOG board peer region tour in Denver. - Item 6B – Long Range Calendar: City Manager noted the next meeting is September 3, 2024, with the AB 1600 report shifted to September 17. Councilmember Neville requested an update on county-level crisis now funding and the city’s allocated funds for receiving centers. Key Outcomes - Oakshade Town Center Amendment: Approved unanimously (5-0) on a motion by Councilmember Neville, second by Councilmember Partida. The ordinance will make residential and office uses permitted (by right) and remove size restrictions. Property owner committed to an arborist report and remediation of tree shade deficiencies. Staff will follow up on code compliance and reinstate 2x2 meetings with the Chamber and DDBA. - Shriners Project EIR Alternatives: Approved unanimously (5-0) a motion by Vice Mayor Vaitla, second by Councilmember Arnold, to proceed with staff’s recommendation and conduct a deeper analysis on alternatives 4 and 5. The draft EIR will include these alternatives with more quantitative detail. - Consent Calendar: All items approved unanimously. - Public Comments: Tree ordinance enforcement and UC worker support were noted; no formal council action taken.

The Davis City Council met on Tuesday, July 30, 2024, beginning at 6:31 p.m. Mayor Chapman presided, with Councilmembers Arnold, Partita, and Neville present and Vice Mayor Vitla joining by phone. No agenda or minutes were available for this summary, which is based solely on the meeting transcript. The council approved the agenda and most consent items, held public hearings on water conservation and LED lighting, adopted objective design standards, and made commission appointments. Consent Calendar - The agenda was approved 5-0. - The consent calendar, minus item 3G, was approved unanimously (5-0). Public comment on consent items included support for direct city employment and fair pay for janitorial workers, support for the California task force on reparations, and support for a city land acknowledgement. Councilmember Partita said she would like the Human Relations Commission to continue discussing more meaningful, policy-level actions beyond the acknowledgement. Public Comments & Testimony - Molly Hillis, speaking for St. Martin's Episcopal Church's Social Justice and Outreach Committee, urged the council to prioritize air conditioning and insulation upgrades at the Davis Respite Center, citing heat exhaustion cases and noting the center closes at 4 p.m. and on holidays. - Steve Streeter and a second Heart of Davis speaker supported the respite center upgrades, noted recent CDBG funding, and asked that ADA and cooling-room work proceed concurrently. They also described volunteer training and a shade structure installed on July 19. - John Lee Slater spoke about applying a Bible-system model to local government and using daily indicators to analyze UC Davis' impact on the city. - Jordan Riley raised wide-ranging allegations involving police harassment, surveillance, and human experimentation. - Alan Hirsch emphasized protecting democratic processes, urged participation in a Yolo election training on August 25, and raised concerns about commission transparency and lost I-80 survey responses. - A speaker, Victor, thanked the council for considering a land acknowledgement and asked that it lead to ongoing education and support for local tribes. - Gaina Lambang, calling in, said 21 of 27 days from July 1-26 reached 100 degrees or higher, that the respite center closes at 4 p.m. and on holidays, and that the July 4 high was 108 degrees with only the Veterans Memorial Center open as a cooling center. She demanded immediate extension of respite center hours and faster upgrades. - Ellen Kalaric, co-chair of Faith Housing Justice Davis, spoke as an individual, expressing concern about heat stroke risks for unsheltered residents, urging climate-controlled cooling capacity, and commenting on consent items involving janitorial services, reparations, and the land acknowledgement. Discussion Items - City Manager announcements: The city launched pre-designed accessory dwelling unit (ADU) plans funded by a SACOG grant. G Street construction between Second and Third streets is expected to begin at the end of August, with a fall grand opening planned. - Legislative calendar (item 3G): The council considered the annual legislative calendar with meetings on the first and third Tuesdays, an exception for November 5, and a proposed July recess instead of August. Councilmember Partita raised concerns that county and other boards recess in August, which could eliminate an actual break. After discussion, the council voted 5-0 to adopt the calendar as presented. - Commission appointments: The council made appointments to four advisory commissions. Public commenter Alan Hirsch criticized reduced public participation on commissions, and Mark Heising sought appointment to the Transportation Commission. The subcommittee recommendations were approved 5-0. Fiscal Commission: Mitchell Maribayashi appointed. Senior Commission: Marsha Coop (regular) and Thomas Roast (alternate) appointed. Social Services and Transportation Commission slates were also approved. Vice Mayor Vitla had said he would recuse from social services and transportation votes, though the announced vote was 5-0. - Water shortage contingency plan update: Staff presented proposed updates to the city's water shortage contingency plan, including making three-days-per-week sprinkler irrigation limits permanent in Stage 1, moving two-days-per-week limits to Stage 2, limiting all sprinkler irrigation to two days per week in Stage 3, and moving vehicle-washing restrictions to Stage 3 with low-water home washing allowed. Public comment included Alan Hirsch's call to prioritize irrigation for playground and downtown trees, and Dylan's questions about enforcement and outreach. Staff said enforcement is education-first and outreach uses Greener Davis, utility bill inserts, and renter/landlord resources. The council approved the resolution 5-0. - LED lighting project: Staff presented the third public hearing for the city facility LED lighting project at corporation yards, City Hall, and the Senior Center. Annual PG&E costs at the four sites are about $260,000; the project would save about $45,000 per year and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Alan Hirsch supported the project and noted the estimated 99 metric tons of GHG reduction is equivalent to about 10 households' annual energy use. Pre-recorded caller Connor Warman broadly supported it while also advocating for public power and municipalization of PG&E. The council authorized the zero-percent on-bill financing agreement with PG&E by a 5-0 vote. - Objective design standards: The Community Development Director presented an ordinance and resolution adopting objective design standards required by state housing laws such as SB 35. Planning Commission recommended approval with changes, including removing the 'earth tones' color requirement, requiring painted or color-coated block, and allowing matte white and vegetative roofs. Council discussion clarified when the standards apply, their relationship to ministerial review, and that affordable-housing projects may seek waivers or concessions. The council amended the motion to remove the front-entry-facing-the-primary-street requirement and to use neutral color language instead of 'earth tones,' then approved the item 5-0. - AB 1234 and long-range calendar: No council members reported meetings attended at city expense under AB 1234. Staff reported no substantive changes to the long-range calendar and said the calendar would be populated using the newly adopted legislative calendar in late August. Key Outcomes - Approved agenda 5-0. - Approved consent calendar minus item 3G 5-0; adopted the legislative calendar 5-0. - Made commission appointments 5-0, with Vice Mayor Vitla's stated recusal from social services and transportation votes. - Approved the water shortage contingency plan update 5-0. - Authorized the LED project and PG&E on-bill financing agreement 5-0. - Adopted the objective design standards ordinance and resolution with amendments 5-0. - No AB 1234 reports were filed; council adjourned after receiving the long-range calendar update.

The Davis Planning Commission met on July 10, 2024, at 7:00 PM to consider two major items: a proposed amendment to the Oak Shade Town Center Planned Development to relax use and size restrictions, and amendments to the Downtown Davis Form Based Code to address legal non-conforming structures. The commission recommended approval of the Oak Shade amendments with a modification and continued the Form Based Code discussion for further research. Brief Announcements - Council liaison Donna Neville noted the City Council had accepted a three-year strategic homelessness plan, which aligns with the upcoming General Plan update. - Staff reported that the Shriners project NOP was released, Palomino and Promenade EIRs are underway, and the North Covell Creek project was formally withdrawn on July 5, 2024. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 5B – Form Based Code Amendments: Luis Miguel, owner of 523 G Street, and his partner Larissa Pomesticova spoke about their two-year effort to develop a five-unit multiplex on their property behind an existing legal non-conforming house. They expressed frustration that after significant investment and staff encouragement, they were told the project cannot proceed under the current code. They urged the commission to reject the proposed amendments that would further limit redevelopment and asked for flexibility to preserve the existing structure while adding density. Discussion Items 5A. Oak Shade Town Center PD Amendment (2107–2151 Cowell Boulevard) - Staff Presentation: Principal Planner Dara Dungworth explained the request by Regency Centers to amend the existing PD to reclassify many conditional uses as permitted, remove size limits (including grocery store cap of 40,000 sq ft), and allow greater leasing flexibility for two vacant anchor spaces (21,000 and 17,000 sq ft). Staff recommended approval, leaving daycare and gas stations as conditional uses. The city’s Economic Development Manager Katie provided data showing Davis has higher commercial vacancy rates than the Sacramento region and nation. - Applicant Presentation: Jennifer Hess from Regency Centers described their marketing efforts and intention to expand the existing grocer (Safeway) into the former Rite Aid space with a pharmacy. No building footprint changes are planned. - Commission Questions: Commissioners inquired about parking, daycare concerns, restaurant competition, and the rationale for historic size limits. Staff noted the limits were originally intended to keep neighborhood centers small and protect downtown, but market conditions have changed. The commission discussed whether to remove the “residential or office uses on upper stories” from permitted uses; a compromise was proposed to move it to conditional uses. - Public Comment: None. - Outcome: The commission voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the PD amendment with the modification that 4A13 (residential or office uses on upper stories) be moved from permitted to conditional use. Commissioner McLaughlin made the motion, seconded by Commissioner Deos. 5B. Downtown Davis Form Based Code Amendments - Staff Presentation: Associate Planner Thomas McNairn presented proposed amendments to clarify legal non-conforming structures. Key provisions: if a non-conforming structure is damaged 60% of appraised value, it must establish a new building type; additions limited to 15% of existing gross square footage; demolition of 25% of perimeter requires new building type; no additional building sites allowed on a lot with a legal non-conforming structure. Staff also proposed to add the duplex building type and increase cottage court heights from 1 to 2 stories. - Commission Questions: Extensive discussion on the 15% and 60% thresholds, their origins, and impacts. Commissioners expressed concern that the rules discourage incremental development, penalize small property owners, and conflict with the goal of densification. They cited the 523 G Street project as an example where an attractive old house could be preserved while adding density. Options like SB9, ADUs, and looking at other cities’ approaches were raised. - Public Comment: Luis Miguel and Larissa Pomesticova detailed their project and pleaded for flexibility. - Commission Deliberation: Nearly all commissioners agreed more research is needed. They directed staff to investigate how other jurisdictions with form-based codes handle legal non-conforming structures, including percentages, hardship cases, and insurance implications. Some suggested the commission might separate the non-conforming issues from other non-controversial amendments (e.g., cottage court heights). Commissioner Bennett proposed cross-referencing language and notifying affected property owners. Key Outcomes - Oak Shade Town Center PD Amendment: The commission voted 7-0 to recommend City Council approval with the modification that Section 4A13 (residential/office on upper stories) be moved from permitted to conditional use. The recommendation also includes a CEQA exemption finding. - Downtown Form Based Code Amendments: The public hearing was continued off calendar to allow staff to conduct additional research on other cities’ practices, the interaction with SB9, ADU allowances, and potential hardship provisions. Staff will return with refined recommendations, likely in late August or September 2024. No vote was taken. - Upcoming Meetings: July 24, August 14, August 28, September 11, and September 25 are reserved, with the July 24 meeting tentatively including a Chipotle design review and conditional use permit.

The Davis City Council met on Tuesday, July 9, 2024, in the Community Chambers at 23 Russell Boulevard, Davis, CA. The meeting was scheduled for 6:30 p.m. and was called to order at 6:36 p.m. Vice Mayor Bapu Vaitla participated by teleconference from 2414 Westernesse Road, Davis, CA, because he had tested positive for COVID-19. All votes were roll call votes and all motions carried 5-0. No meeting minutes were available for this session. The agenda included a Disability Pride Month proclamation, approval of the consent calendar (with the G Street Activation item pulled for discussion), authorization of the Shriners Property Notice of Preparation (NOP) and draft EIR process, and adoption of the Three-Year Davis Homeless Strategic Plan (2024–2027). Ceremonial Presentation - Councilmember Arnold read a proclamation recognizing July 2024 as Disability Pride Month, marking the 34th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act (signed July 26, 1990). Robin Dewey of Team Davis accepted the proclamation and described Team Davis as a local nonprofit providing free athletic, social, recreational, and educational activities; she said its roughly 500 participants, families, volunteers, and supporters make Davis 'the best place in the country to live if you have a disability.' She thanked community partners including the city's adaptive recreation program, UC Davis and Davis High School Best Buddies, YOLO People First, Purple Tree Cafe, True Connections, YOLO Neuro Diverse Network, Developmental Disability Future Planning Group of YOLO County, and Alter Regional Center. City Manager & Council Announcements - City Manager Mike Webb gave heat safety reminders: temperatures were forecast to exceed 100 degrees Wednesday through Saturday; cooling locations include the Senior Center (open until 4 p.m. Monday–Thursday and until 8 p.m. Friday) and the Mary Stevens Davis Library (open until 8 p.m. Monday–Thursday and 5:30 p.m. Friday); pool and swim hours vary and are posted at cityofdavis.org; Paul's Place and the Respite Center also have availability. - Webb announced a $1.6 million Federal Transit Administration grant, awarded to the city on behalf of Unitrans, for electric bus infrastructure and chargers to support up to 16 battery-electric buses. The total project is about $8.5 million, funded almost entirely by federal and grant sources; construction is slated for 2026 with buses arriving in 2027. - Webb also announced $1 million in federal appropriations for the Olive Drive–Amtrak station bicycle/pedestrian undercrossing connection, along with a $1 million contribution from the Rider Apartments development and the Olive Drive landing site provided through that development agreement. - No councilmember liaison reports were given. Vice Mayor Vaitla noted his absence was due to COVID-19. Consent Calendar - The Council approved the consent calendar (items 4A through 4K3), minus item 4B (G Street Activation, pulled by Vice Mayor Vaitla), on a 5-0 vote. Routine items included the Central Park Revitalization Project (Natalie's Corner) construction contract award to Abide Builders Inc.; Veterans Memorial Theater Siding Project award to J-Walt Construction (listed as 'J-W alt Construction' in the agenda); purchase of cationic emulsion polymer for the wastewater treatment plant; the Stormwater Utility Fund update and rate adjustment (effective July 1, 2022, implemented August 1, 2024); on-call geotechnical engineering and materials testing agreements with Construction Testing Services, Blackburn Consulting, Geocon, Terracon Consultants Inc., and UES; the City Manager employment agreement; second readings of ordinances making the bike and scooter share program permanent and revising purchasing requirements; the Legislative Subcommittee update; and commission/committee minutes. - City Attorney Inder Khalsa made the Brown Act-required announcement about the City Manager's employment agreement: a 2% cost-of-living increase effective January 9, 2024; removal of pension cost sharing; performance bonuses equivalent to 3% of salary for calendar year 2023 and 3% for calendar year 2024 (the latter payable in January 2025); and an increase in annual leave cash-out from 120 to 200 hours. - Councilmember Neville commented on consent item J without pulling it, noting the Legislative Subcommittee's funding letter requests (including the one that helped secure the Olive Drive/Amtrak funding), the letter of support for AB 817 (which would allow more teleconferencing flexibility for advisory bodies), ACA 1 on the November 5, 2024 ballot (lowering the voter threshold from two-thirds to 55% for local general obligation bonds and special taxes for affordable housing and public infrastructure), and the California Supreme Court decision keeping the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act off the ballot as an unconstitutional revision. Public Comments & Testimony (General) - Lois Wolk, chair of the Natalie Corona Committee, reported that the committee reached its $500,000 fundraising goal for the Central Park splash pad honoring Officer Natalie Corona. A $50,000 Sutter Health grant brought the total to $496,000 on July 3, and Davis firefighters (DPFA) donated the remaining $4,000. She urged approval of item 4A and invited the community to the September 14, 10:00 a.m. groundbreaking. - Dorta Jensen raised concerns about camera angles during public comment and audience members with signs; she thanked the council for adjusting the camera angle. - Dorothy Riley alleged FBI/police COINTELPRO targeting, torture, and trafficking; she repeated similar claims during the homeless plan item. - Mel, a delegate from Davis's Sister City Sangju, South Korea, said this is the 20th anniversary of the sister city relationship (established in 2004) and that she is the 13th delegate; she invited councilmembers to visit Sangju in October. - Gray Crawford said his public comment at the June 4 meeting was disrupted by an audience member holding signs and moving to stay in camera view; he said his free speech was infringed and encouraged strict enforcement of rules prohibiting audience response. - An unnamed resident described the area between Cindy's restaurant and a motel as looking like 'Skid Row' and reported seeing teenagers counting money, which he suspected indicated drug dealing. - Ryan Darling said only two of his roughly 800-person Davis High School graduating class remain in town; he cited the average first-time homebuyer age in California as 49 and urged more local employment opportunities and permitting reform for young people. - Floyd Sparks alleged unfair eviction and loss of his Section 8 voucher at Creekside Apartments, saying his girlfriend was also evicted; he asked the city to investigate the property manager. - Pre-recorded commenter Connor Gorman supported Disability Pride Month and increased accessibility; supported making the G Street Activation space truly public and open to everyone; urged accessibility improvements (including weight and age restrictions) for the bike/scooter share program; supported the 2024 legislative priorities including AB 817; and urged the council to advocate for universal single-payer health care. - One commenter (Alan) performed a song during general public comment. Discussion Item: G Street Activation (Consent Item 4B) - Vice Mayor Vaitla requested discussion of communication with the business community on G Street, saying something was not working about messaging and business input. Staff (Assistant Public Works Director Ryan Chapman and Economic Development Director Katie Yancey) responded that the project must go out to bid within two weeks to be delivered by November 1; letters were sent through the Davis Downtown Business Association (DDBA) in May and physical copies were delivered to businesses. Yancey said she joined the project in early June specifically to improve stakeholder communication and that the current proposal is a 'stripped-down' version that can pivot and does not preclude future leasing to adjacent businesses or an entertainment district with alcohol consumption. - Councilmember Neville noted his understanding that the funds (ARPA) must be expended by the end of the calendar year; staff confirmed. Councilmember Partida said she was surprised businesses did not respond, and asked why the platform no longer extends to the beer shop; staff cited budget constraints and the business's non-participation, but said it could be added later. Councilmember Arnold said maintaining flexibility is important and that carving out a small downtown streetscape for people rather than vehicle throughput remains central. Mayor Chapman summarized that the underlying infrastructure is largely unchanged and the shift is to offer the space to the public first, with businesses able to enter lease negotiations later. - Public comment: Brett Lee, executive director of the Davis Downtown Business Association, spoke as an individual (stating the DDBA board has not taken a position). He said communication could be improved, noted three meetings with Katie Yancey in the past month, described city staff's outreach as generally good, reacted positively to the proposal, and said a check-in meeting is planned after implementation to make positive changes. - The Council approved all staff recommendations (receive the update; authorize the City Manager to execute the construction contract during recess not to exceed $1,300,000; approve a sole source purchase for furnishings; purchase project materials in advance of contract award; and issue a budget adjustment not to exceed $400,000 from Park Impact Fees) by a 5-0 vote. Discussion Item: Shriners Property – Notice of Preparation & Draft EIR (Item 5) - Principal Planner Dara Dungworth presented the project: approximately 232 acres, currently undeveloped and previously used for agriculture; located outside Davis city limits and the city's sphere of influence; Yolo County General Plan and zoning designations are agricultural. The proposal is a mixed-use development with 1,200 dwelling units (affordable and market-rate, single- and multi-family), neighborhood services, public/semi-public and educational uses, on- and off-site improvements, parks, open space, and greenbelts. Required approvals include a sphere of influence amendment, annexation, general plan amendment, pre-zoning, a development agreement, tentative subdivision maps, and a baseline project features agreement. - The EIR will include 14 chapters. The NOP requests public and agency input on the scope of analysis. A scoping meeting is scheduled for 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, July 25, 2024, at the Senior Center. - Preliminary alternatives presented: (1) No Project (required by CEQA); (2) 930 units on the same 232 acres (gross density 4.01 units/acre); (3) 1,200 units on 170 acres aligned with the Wildhorse boundary (7.06 units/acre); (4) 1,200 units on 100 acres aligned with the Palomino Place boundary (12 units/acre); and (5) a higher number of units on the 232-acre footprint, with the unit count to be determined. Staff calculated the proposed project's gross density at just over 5.1 units per acre. - Public commenters included: George Phillips (on behalf of the Shriners property) expressed pleasure at reaching this stage and supported moving the NOP forward. John Decker (Alta California Regional Center) said about 480 of its clients with developmental disabilities live in Davis, mostly with aging family caregivers, and expressed hope that the project would provide affordable housing; he noted the project team approached the Regional Center about a year ago. Parker Evans (Mutual Housing California) said his nonprofit has developed affordable housing in the region for 30+ years, operates six affordable communities in Davis (including Moore Village and Autolante), and is engaged as the affordable developer partner. A young speaker named Charlie asked the council to move the project forward so he and friends with disabilities can live and work in Davis. Victor Lagoonis (Davis Community Action Network) said he was pleased the project includes 20% affordable housing, which he said is over the 15%, plus below-market-rate units and open space/community park dedication; he urged greater overall density, equitable distribution of densities, solar shade structures, bike infrastructure, and additional lit athletic fields, citing data that 85% of people drive to work while 35% could bike in under 20 minutes. - Pre-recorded commenters Tamara Range, Deborah Ring, Christina Buss, Nora, Jessica Guerreri, and Mary Nissan all urged the council to approve the staff recommendation so the project can move into the NOP phase, citing the need for low-income housing for adults with intellectual/developmental disabilities. Mary Nissan also asked that the Alta California Regional Center be included in subcommittee discussions. Connor Gorman asked for more detailed quantitative analysis of EIR alternatives and for analysis of the negative impacts of not building a project or building a different project. - Council discussion: Staff explained that decisions about quantitative vs. qualitative analysis of alternatives need to be made early because additional studies are required. Councilmember Partida asked for density comparisons (the proposed project is just over 5.1 gross units per acre; staff believed the Cannery is roughly 6–7 units per acre but said they would confirm). Councilmember Neville asked about the alternative with a 'TBD' unit count, noting the project itself is not an 'alternative'; staff said the number could be set by VMT analysis and that detailed fiscal/financial analysis comes later through the development agreement process, not CEQA. Staff said a microgrid would be addressed through project review, the sustainability plan, or the development agreement. Asked about the Section 404 permit reference, staff noted a channel traverses the northern portion of the site. Councilmember Arnold noted that staff used the same methodology as the Village Farms EIR (including the same 22.5% unit reduction for the lower-unit alternative) and argued that under current CEQA/SACOG VMT methodology, no project in Davis can avoid a significant and unavoidable VMT impact finding. City Manager Webb agreed that VMT standards are geared to very urban environments. - Vice Mayor Vaitla proposed, and the Council approved 5-0, moving staff recommendation 1 with the following parameters: a total of five alternatives, with at least two alternatives at densities that achieve VMT per capita at least 15% below the current City of Davis average, at least one of those on the full project footprint, and the detailed alternatives brought back to the Council for final consideration. - The Council then appointed two members to an ad hoc subcommittee to work with staff and represent the city in Development Agreement/Baseline Project Features negotiations with the applicant and Tax Share negotiations with the County. Councilmember Partida and Mayor Chapman were appointed (motion by Partida, second by Neville; 5-0). Vice Mayor Vaitla and Councilmember Arnold had expressed interest but deferred. Discussion Item: Three-Year Davis Homeless Strategic Plan 2024–2027 (Item 6) - Social Services & Housing Director Dana Bailey presented the plan. Development began in November 2023 when the Council authorized a contract with RDA consultants; RDA consulted groups involved in the 2019 plan, including Davis Opportunity Village (DOVE), Davis Community Meals and Housing, and Heart of Davis. The process included a landscape analysis, point-in-time (PIT) counts, a SWOT analysis, surveys at Paul's Place and the Daytime Respite Center (with gift cards for participants), 46 one-on-one interviews, and two steering committee workshops (one in person, one virtual). The PIT count in Davis was 190 in 2019, 181 in 2022, and 162 in 2024; staff said neighboring jurisdictions' counts rose. Data showed increases in people experiencing homelessness four or more times in three years and in people homeless for more than a year. Staff said primary barriers include services for severe mental illness and substance abuse, housing navigation assistance, and service availability. - The top five services identified by people with lived experience were: multi-day motel/shelter stays, housing search assistance, one-time shelter help, first and last month's rent, and home basics (food, showers, benefit connections). - The plan's vision is 'a community-wide network of care grounded in respect, delivering humanizing and person-centered support to individuals and families who are housing insecure,' with guiding principles of respect, inclusiveness, collaboration, bold and progressive solutions, equitable solutions, and being person-centered. The three priority areas are: (1) prevention – a cohesive system of policies, strategies, and programs that help people remain in housing; (2) right-fit housing – sustainable, inclusive, accessible, supportive housing and sheltering solutions matched to individual needs, with an evidence-based funding strategy; and (3) a strong provider, partner, and community network prioritizing urgency, efficiency, and equity, including trauma-informed and equity-focused training. - The plan calls on the city department to lead implementation, provide regular progress reports through the Social Services Commission, convene annual community progress meetings, and avoid letting the plan 'sit on the shelf.' - Public commenters strongly urged prioritizing a permanent, year-round shelter: - Gaina Lambang thanked staff; noted the PIT count (181 in 2022) may undercount and that the need could be up to 793 people with major housing problems; noted Paul's Place is closed on weekends; and urged a year-round shelter and upgrades to the Respite Center (which she said lacks air conditioning, heating, and a door in the rest area). - Steve Streeter advocated for a year-round permanent shelter, fenced safe parking, Respite Center improvements, compliance with hospital/ER discharge laws, a 'federal phone booth' (which he said Sacramento and Woodland have but Davis does not), part-time employment support, and noted progress on tiny homes and the Walters House expansion. - Barbara Cletter (Interfaith Housing Justice Davis co-chair) said the plan does not list permanent shelter as a near-term goal/action and urged adding a goal to achieve permanent shelter within the next year. - Shoshana Zatz (Heart of Davis president) said the plan is useful but short on specifics and measurable objectives; that the PIT count undercounts; and that permanent year-round shelter (including safe parking, enhanced camping, and congregate/non-congregate shelter) must be the number one priority. She urged the city not to spend another year or two on an implementation plan. - Carrie Schender urged immediate action in the next few months given heat and cold, including sanctioned van/car camping and permanent shelter. - Alan Miller described impacts of visible homelessness (human waste, garbage, loose dogs, and a fire hazard behind his fence) and asserted that the Grants Pass and Martin v. Boise decisions 'have been nullified,' urging the city to address these problems and move people out of public spaces. - Victor Lagoonis, a former winter rotating shelter volunteer, said extreme heat shows the need does not end in winter; he appreciated the plan's holistic wraparound approach and suggested naming partnerships with the school district and students. - Mason Harry said 'if words could solve homelessness, we wouldn't be here right now' and urged the council to push for tangible answers within the next six months. - Pre-recorded commenters included Susan Padgett (Davis Methodist Church), who urged quick action on year-round emergency shelter and asked about winter shelter plans; Connor Gorman, who said housing is the main solution to homelessness and supported a holistic approach; and Martha Teeter, who thanked the 17-member steering committee, RDA consultants, and staff; noted that financial help, multi-day shelter stays, and permanent shelter/interim housing are key; cited that 59% of respondents said consistent access to a therapist or peer mentor would increase their use of supportive services; and noted the 2019 peer-mentor training was curtailed by COVID. - Council discussion: Councilmembers Arnold and Neville praised the work and stressed implementation. Neville said the PIT count undercount is important to acknowledge, voiced concern that parts of the plan lack measurable/tangible goals, and urged a definitive plan for a permanent year-round shelter. He asked about county alignment and Behavioral Health Services Act funding; Bailey said the state is no longer focused on funding new shelters and that programs like HHAP restrict funding to previously awarded jurisdictions, so the city is looking at permanent/transitional housing funding. Partida appreciated the SWOT analysis and the emphasis on understanding the problem before acting, asked about alignment with the county's homeless plan, and stressed addressing upstream entry points, not just emergency shelter. - In response to Vice Mayor Vaitla's request to address the shelter need directly, Bailey said Davis is unique; models include Woodland's congregate shelter plus tiny homes/modulars and West Sacramento's use of small motels; a year-round shelter requires trained 24/7 staff and careful planning, and 'it's not something that's going to happen quickly.' She said she would meet with the Council subcommittee by no later than August 2024 and that by September 2024 the city will be working with a new collaborative entity to implement prioritized goals. - Mayor Chapman said the subcommittee should meet with staff on a regular (e.g., monthly) basis and should work hand-in-hand with staff to prioritize and implement actions, so that the council is involved from the start rather than reviewing priorities later. - The Council adopted the plan and staff recommendations by a 5-0 vote (motion by Partida, second by Neville), with Councilmember Partida joining Mayor Chapman on the Council Subcommittee on Homelessness (Councilmember Arnold stepped aside). Key Outcomes - Agenda approved 5-0. - Consent calendar (items 4A–4K3, minus 4B) approved 5-0. - G Street Activation staff recommendations approved 5-0, including a construction contract authorization not to exceed $1,300,000 during the council recess, a sole source furnishings purchase, advance material purchases, and a budget adjustment of up to $400,000 from Park Impact Fees; continued business outreach was emphasized. - Shriners Property: Council authorized staff to issue the NOP (5-0), with at least two EIR alternatives achieving VMT per capita at least 15% below the city average, at least one on the full project footprint, and final alternatives returning to the Council for review. Scoping meeting: July 25, 2024, 6:30 p.m., Senior Center. Ad hoc subcommittee appointed: Councilmember Partida and Mayor Chapman (5-0). - Three-Year Davis Homeless Strategic Plan (2024–2027) adopted 5-0; staff directed to implement the plan; the Homelessness Subcommittee is now Mayor Chapman and Councilmember Partida; staff will meet with the subcommittee by August 2024 and establish a collaborative implementation body by September 2024; progress reports will go through the Social Services Commission, with annual community meetings. - No councilmembers reported meetings attended at city expense (AB 1234). - Next regular council meeting: Tuesday, July 30, 2024. The meeting adjourned; the transcript does not record an adjournment time.

The Planning Commission met on Wednesday, June 26, 2024, at 7:00 PM to receive an informational presentation on economic development opportunities and to consider adopting objective design standards for qualifying residential projects. The meeting included public comments, a unanimous consent calendar approval, and several amendments to the proposed design standards before recommending the ordinance and resolution to the City Council. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously (motion by Commissioner Bennett, seconded by Commissioner McLaughlin) the lot line adjustments for 2525 and 2555 Research Park Drive, and 500, 506, and 512 G Street (informational item). Public Comments & Testimony - David Sandino (South Davis resident) urged the Commission to add a standing agenda item discussing new land use legislation, cases, and litigation. He referenced the AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. Rob Bonta case and the need for strategic thinking on SB 35 implementation. He also recommended that the Commission take more time on the objective design standards, suggesting a subcommittee to improve design review for the entire city. - Ningwan (owner of Ningwan Soap, Historical Resources Management Commission member) spoke about her family's history in Davis and raised concerns about property issues and communist inspectors. She expressed interest in being more involved with city planning. Discussion Items A. Economic Development Opportunities and Objectives (Katie Yancey, Economic Development Director) - Katie Yancey presented her first-year work plan, including building an economic development toolbox (CoStar, ESRI Business Analyst), developing relationships with local and regional stakeholders, addressing building vacancies (with a pilot focusing on retail), and creating an economic development strategy. She discussed the need for a vacant/underutilized land inventory, an assessment of shopping centers, and identifying regulatory barriers to retail attraction. She also highlighted working with projects stalled by parking requirements and plans to integrate economic development principles citywide. Commissioners expressed strong support and interest in regular updates, with Commissioner Valencia asking about defining "community benefit" and engaging with UC Davis. Yancey noted a partnership grant application with the university. B. Objective Design Standards for Qualified Projects (Sherri Metzker, Community Development Director; Inder Khalsa, City Attorney) - Sherri Metzker explained that the state requires a streamlined ministerial approval process for qualifying residential projects, subject only to objective design standards. She presented a 61-item checklist covering site planning, architecture, materials, and roof features. The goal is to set clear, measurable standards that ensure minimum design quality while eliminating subjective discretion. Commissioners discussed several elements: - Stepbacks (Item 37): Initially required 8-foot stepbacks every 40 feet. After debate, a motion to reduce to a range of 5 to 8 feet (deleting the total of 16 feet) passed unanimously. - Roof Colors (Item 53): Amended to allow white or off-white roofs if non-glare, and vegetative (green) roofs, in addition to gray, brown, and terracotta. Passed unanimously. - Colors (Items 48 and 49): Item 48 amended to require a minimum of three colors with contrast; unpainted concrete not counted as a color. Item 49 (mandatory earth tone) was deleted. Passed unanimously. - Downspouts (Item 59): A motion to delete the requirement for internal downspouts on buildings over 40 feet failed 2-4. - Mechanical Equipment (Item 51): Amended to exclude solar panels from screening requirements. Passed unanimously. - Commissioners also discussed the need to revisit the standards periodically and requested staff return with an update after implementation. The city attorney noted that density bonus law allows waiver requests for even objective standards. Key Outcomes - Recommendation to City Council: The Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council: 1. Introduce an ordinance amending Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code to add Section 40.31.035 (citywide objective design standards for qualifying mixed-use and multifamily housing developments) and make a CEQA exemption determination. 2. Approve a resolution establishing the objective design standards, as amended (Items 37, 48, 49, 51, 53). - Staff was authorized to wordsmith the language to reflect the adopted amendments. - The Commission agreed to continue discussion on the long-range calendar, including upcoming items: downtown form-based code amendments (July 10 and August 14), Chipotle design review (July 24), and Oakshade Town Center planned development amendment (July 10). - Commissioner Brinkley will share a link to her nationwide general plan database with the Commission. - Staff will follow up on SB 10 (upzoning to 10 units per parcel) with the City Council's infill subcommittee.

The Davis City Council met on Tuesday, June 18, 2024, beginning at 6:49 p.m. (agenda listed 6:30 p.m.) and adjourned after 9:35 p.m. The meeting included ceremonial presentations, public comments, and several significant agenda items, including approval of a battery energy storage system at the wastewater treatment plant, allocation of federal grant funds for community development and housing, advancement of an underpass connecting the Amtrak station to Olive Drive, and placement of a one-cent sales tax measure on the November 2024 ballot. Consent Calendar - The council approved the consent calendar (5-0), which included: Task Order 10.2 for Richards Boulevard/I-80 Interchange design services; purchase of chemicals for the wastewater treatment plant; contingency increase for City Hall portable office trailer project; renewal of contract for enterprise software services with Central Square; professional services agreements for on-call landscape architecture and habitat restoration; an ordinance making permanent the bike and scooter share program (Spin); an ordinance revising purchasing requirements for informal bidding on public projects; and second reading of an ordinance re-adopting a military equipment use policy. Public Comments & Testimony - Kevin Wan (Davis Downtown president) expressed the board's unanimous support for placing a sales tax measure on the November ballot, noting plans to engage the downtown community. - Beth Bourne spoke against city support for transgender youth, asserting that affirming gender identity is harmful. - Dorda Jensen opposed the proposed sales tax increase, citing concerns about no sunset clause and potential economic disincentives. - Alan Miller criticized police response to crime and arson, calling for better public safety. - Alan Hirsch (Davis Lorax) urged support for the battery storage project and the Amtrak underpass, but expressed concern about freeway widening and reduced bus service on the 42 line. - Several speakers supported the battery storage system at the wastewater treatment plant, including Elaine Roberts Musser, who noted the project reduces costs and emissions. - Multiple speakers supported using CDBG funds to improve the respite center's resting room (HVAC, insulation, ADA access), including John Castle Franco, Barbara Cletter, and others representing Heart of Davis and Interfaith Housing Justice Davis. - Public comments on the Amtrak project favored the underpass option and asked for adequate width, tree replacement, and bike connectivity. - On the sales tax measure, opinions were divided: Helen Rowland Kramer, Barbara Cletter, Greg Rowe, Georgina Valencia, Norby Kumagai, and Vanessa Eric Hardy (Davis Chamber of Commerce) supported placing it on the ballot; Elaine Roberts Musser and Alan Miller opposed, citing lack of accountability and past unmet promises. Discussion Items - Item 5: Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) at Wastewater Treatment Plant – Staff presented a project to install a BESS to reduce peak electricity costs and greenhouse gas emissions. The $3.4 million project cost is offset by approximately $1.9 million in Self-Generation Incentive Program funds and nearly $1 million in Inflation Reduction Act tax credits, leaving $500,000 for the city. Councilmembers expressed excitement and support, with Councilmember Neville asking for follow-up on the SGIP source. The public hearing was held, and the council voted 5-0 to approve the resolution, create a CIP, and authorize the project. - Item 6: CDBG and HOME 2024-25 Funding Recommendations – Social Services & Housing Director Dana Bailey presented the annual action plan allocation of $1,062,361 in total HUD funds ($720,157 CDBG, $342,202 HOME). Recommendations included: CDBG public services ($108,023) to seven local organizations; CDBG public facilities ($468,000) for ADA improvements and HVAC at the respite center; HOME funds ($342,202) to Mutual Housing for rehabilitation of New Harmony site (water heater and softener). The council discussed the scope of the respite center improvements, phasing if bids exceed funds, and the process for awarding contracts. The council voted 5-0 to approve the resolution adopting the CDBG and HOME funding recommendations and the Annual Action Plan. - Item 7: Amtrak ADA / Olive Drive Shared-Use Path Connection – Amtrak Project Manager Sophia Jones-Bradford and city staff presented the 30% design for an underpass (tunnel) connecting the Amtrak platform to Olive Drive, chosen over an overpass to preserve historic aesthetics and improve accessibility. The project will bring the station into ADA compliance (by 2029 deadline) and create a safer bike/pedestrian link. Amtrak’s design and construction are fully funded ($2.5 million from IIJA); the city is responsible for funding the shared-use path connection ($3.5 million, with a pending grant application). Construction is estimated to complete by 2028. The council received the update and approved a resolution authorizing the city manager to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with Amtrak (5-0). Questions addressed parking impacts, construction staging, and tree replacement. - Item 8: Transaction and Use (Sales) Tax Increase – Assistant City Manager Kelly Stachowicz presented the final step to place a one-percent general sales tax increase on the November 5, 2024 ballot. The measure would raise the local rate from 1% to 2% (total 8.25% to 9.25%), generating approximately $11 million annually for general government use, with no sunset, annual audits, and public disclosure. The council heard public comments, then discussed the ballot language (75 words) and the process for writing ballot arguments. Councilmembers Arnold and Neville volunteered for the subcommittee. The council voted 5-0 to approve the resolution placing the measure on the ballot, introduce the ordinance (pending voter approval), and appoint Councilmembers Arnold and Neville to the subcommittee to draft arguments. Key Outcomes - Approved (5-0): Energy Conservation Agreement with EVA Green Power for a Battery Energy Storage System at the wastewater treatment plant; creation of a CIP for the project. - Approved (5-0): Resolution awarding 2024-25 CDBG and HOME funds as recommended, and adoption of the Annual Action Plan. - Approved (5-0): Resolution authorizing the city manager to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with Amtrak for the ADA/ Olive Drive underpass project; received update on 30% design. - Approved (5-0): Resolution ordering a November 2024 ballot measure to increase the local sales tax from 1% to 2%; introduced the enabling ordinance; appointed Councilmembers Arnold and Neville to the ballot argument subcommittee. - The council also approved the consent calendar (5-0) as presented. - The meeting adjourned at approximately 9:35 p.m., following additional public comment on the long-range calendar.

The Davis City Council met on June 5, 2024 (agenda and transcript indicate the meeting was held on June 4, but the official date provided for this summary is June 5). The council approved the FY 2024/25 mid-cycle budget with a general fund reserve at 7.5%, renewed surveillance technology and military equipment policies, and directed staff to return on June 18 with ballot language for a November 2024 general sales tax measure of up to 1%. Three proclamations were presented, and lengthy public comment addressed LGBTQ+ issues, the budget, and the proposed revenue measure. Consent Calendar - Short-Range Transit Plan and Cost-Share Agreement – Approved resolution awarding a professional services agreement to Transportation Management & Design Inc. and authorized the city manager to sign a cost-share agreement with UC Davis. - General Municipal Election (November 5, 2024) – Approved resolutions calling the election, requesting consolidation with the statewide election, and adopting revised district boundaries including The Promenade annexation. - Police Accountability Commission Action and Minutes – Received annual review of the Independent Police Auditor and minutes from multiple meetings as informational. Public Comments & Testimony - Proclamations (Item 1) – Several speakers expressed strong support for LGBTQ+ Pride Month and gun violence awareness; others opposed the proclamations, arguing against transgender policies and criticizing the focus on Pride over veterans. - General Public Comment (Item 3) – Residents raised concerns about district elections, commission mergers, ADA accessibility, and climate resilience. One speaker alleged conflicts of interest involving a council member’s nonprofit and business. - Surveillance Technology (Item 5) – Public comments questioned the necessity of drones and militarized equipment, cited civil liberties concerns, and urged reconsideration of police funding. The chair of the Police Accountability Commission reported that the commission found the written report insufficient to justify certain equipment requests. - Budget (Item 6) – Commenters criticized the rapid decline in the general fund reserve (from 21% to 7.5%), questioned the fiscal prudence of the council, and argued for redirecting police funds to social services. Others highlighted the need for transparent service-level reporting. - Revenue Measure (Item 7) – Supporters (including Interfaith Housing Justice Davis) urged the council to put a general sales tax measure on the ballot and to dedicate funds to a housing trust fund. Opponents called the tax regressive, argued the city should first seek contributions from UC Davis, and demanded a long-term financial plan before any tax increase. Discussion Items - Proclamations – Councilmembers presented proclamations for Juneteenth (June 19), National Gun Violence Awareness Month (June), and LGBTQ+ Pride Month (June). Recipients spoke about the significance of each, including personal stories and calls to action. - Surveillance Technology and Military Equipment Renewals – Police Chief Darren Pytel reviewed 20 surveillance technologies and military equipment items. No new technologies were added beyond replacements for aging equipment (e.g., drones, trail cameras). The council approved continued use after a public hearing, noting no modifications to policies and a single internal policy violation. - FY 2024/25 Mid-Cycle Budget – Finance Director Elena Adair presented the updated budget, highlighting a $2 million interfund loan from the Water Fund to the Solid Waste Fund, a general fund reserve of 7.5% (down from 8.9% projected), and $275,000 in departmental cuts (overtime, materials, temporary staff). The council approved the budget, the Redevelopment Successor Agency budget, the interfund loan, and the appropriations limit for FY 2024/25. - Proposed Revenue Measure – City Manager Mike Webb and Assistant City Manager Kelly Stachowicz presented a state-of-the-city overview and options for increasing revenue. A community survey showed majority support for a general sales tax increase. The council discussed the need for a simple-majority general tax (not a two-thirds special tax) and directed staff to prepare ballot language for a November 2024 measure to increase the local sales tax by 1% (generating approximately $11 million annually). - Long-Range Calendar – Councilmember Gloria Partida requested adding a discussion on facial recognition technology to a future meeting, citing a recommendation from the Police Accountability Commission. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar – Approved unanimously (5-0). - Surveillance Technology and Military Equipment – Approved findings and continued use of all technologies and equipment (motion by Councilmember Arnold, second by Councilmember Neville; vote 5-0). - FY 2024/25 Mid-Cycle Budget – Approved four resolutions (budget adoption, Successor Agency budget, Water-to-Solid Waste loan, and appropriations limit) (motion by Councilmember Neville, second by Vice Mayor Vaitla; vote 5-0). - Revenue Measure – Directed staff and the city attorney to return on June 18, 2024, with necessary documents to place a 1% local sales tax increase on the November 2024 ballot as a general tax (motion by Councilmember Partida, second by Vice Mayor Vaitla; vote 5-0). - Long-Range Calendar – Council agreed to add facial recognition technology discussion to a future agenda.

The Davis City Council met on Tuesday, May 21, 2024, beginning at 6:39 p.m. (agenda listed 6:30 p.m.) and concluding past midnight. The meeting featured ceremonial proclamations, a consent calendar approved 4-0, extensive public testimony, and action on restructuring the city's advisory commissions, appointing new commissioners, and adopting a mid-cycle budget update with fee increases. Councilmember Donna Neville was absent. Ceremonial Presentations - Public Works Week (May 19–25): Presented by Councilmember Arnold; Alexis Eastwood and Ryan Chapman accepted. - Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage Month: Presented by Councilmember Partida; Alan Way and Aaron Wendra of APAPA accepted, noting the chapter's internship program connecting students with elected officials. - Jewish American Heritage Month: Presented (speaker not specified); Rob Eagle of Congregation Bet Haverim accepted, expressing appreciation for the resolution and noting rising anti-Semitism. - May is Bike Month: Presented by Councilmember Partida; Trish Price of Bike Davis accepted, highlighting 63 miles of off-street paths and 120 miles of bike lanes. - Mental Health Awareness Month: Presented by Mayor Chapman; Tagwin Millard of CommuniCare+OLE accepted, referencing the organization's history as the Davis Community Free Clinic. Consent Calendar - The council approved the consent calendar 4-0, with Councilmember Partida abstaining from Item 4B (Pride Month crosswalk coloring and banners). Items included: - Contract for Playfields Park ADA Improvements. - Authorizing Pride Month activities. - Second reading of the Chiles Ranch Development Agreement amendment. - Open Space and Habitat Commission minutes. Public Comments & Testimony - Commission Restructuring (Item 5A): Over 40 public comments, both in person and by voicemail, addressed the proposed commission mergers. Supporters cited efficiency and alignment with city goals; opponents argued loss of citizen input, particularly for the Tree Commission, Finance and Budget Commission, and Utilities Commission. - Appointments to Human Relations Commission (Item 5B): A significant number of comments focused on the candidacy of Dr. Amir Cole. Supporters described him as a bridge-builder and called allegations a "slander campaign"; opponents cited his behavior during a student protest in October 2023, alleging harassment and intimidation. Similar comments were made about other candidates, including Dima Tamimi and Felix Alvarez. - Budget and Fees (Item 6): A commenter opposed Unitrans and Davis Community Transit fare increases, arguing they burden seniors and people with disabilities. Another supported modest increases to maintain service. - General Public Comments: Residents spoke about anti-Semitism, a personal robbery incident, homeless-related violence, and support for the climate and environmental justice commission. Discussion Items - Commission Structures and Scopes (Item 5A): Assistant City Manager Kelly Stachowicz presented the subcommittee's recommendations to merge six commissions into three new ones (Climate and Environmental Justice, Fiscal, and Transportation) and update scopes for others. After a lengthy public comment period and council deliberation, the council voted 4-0 to approve all five staff recommendations: 1. Approve the general resolution on commission structure. 2. Conclude work of specified existing commissions. 3. Establish new commissions (Climate and Environmental Justice, Fiscal, Transportation). 4. Re-establish six commissions (Human Relations, Open Space and Habitat, Police Accountability, Recreation and Parks, Senior Citizen, Social Services). 5. Modify Historical Resources Management Commission membership (reduce from seven to five members, meet on demand). - Appointments to Advisory Commissions (Item 5B): The council individually appointed members to the Fiscal, Human Relations, Open Space and Habitat, Planning, Police Accountability, and Senior Citizen Commissions, using a ranked-choice method. Notable appointments included Dr. Amir Cole (Human Relations Commission regular member) and Dima Tamimi (Human Relations Commission regular member), both receiving unanimous votes. The city clerk announced terms starting July 1, 2024. - Fiscal Year 2024/25 Mid-Cycle Budget Update (Item 6A): Finance Director Elena Adair presented the updated general fund summary, projecting a 0.4% revenue increase and 1.3% expenditure decrease, but with the reserve fund balance dropping from 8.9% to 7.5%. To close a structural deficit, the city is deferring capital projects (e.g., Community Park restrooms, Arlington roundabout), reducing OPEB contributions to pay-as-you-go, and seeking $1 million in departmental cuts. City Manager Mike Webb highlighted the impact of new labor contracts and PG&E cost increases ($1 million annually). The council received the update and directed staff to return June 4, 2024, with adoption of the mid-cycle adjustments and a proposed revenue measure for November 2024. - Public Hearing: City Fees and Charges (Item 6B): The council approved a resolution adopting fee increases for Unitrans and Davis Community Transit (2024 and 2025), as well as other city fees (e.g., swimming passes, mobile stage rental, Veterans Memorial Theater). The Unitrans fare increase was noted as a modest adjustment to maintain service. The motion passed 4-0. Key Outcomes - Commission Restructuring Approved: The council voted 4-0 to approve the commission structure changes, effective July 1, 2024. - Commission Appointments Made: Unanimous appointments filled vacancies on six commissions, with terms starting July 1. - Budget Update Received: Staff will return June 4 for final adoption of mid-cycle adjustments and discussion of a revenue measure. - Fee Increases Adopted: Unitrans, Davis Community Transit, and other city fees were increased via a 4-0 vote. - Councilmember Partida abstained from Item 4B due to potential conflict of interest (employment with Phoenix Coalition). - Next Steps: Staff will bring back specifics on $1 million departmental cuts and a revenue measure proposal on June 4, 2024.

The Davis City Council held a special meeting at 5:33 PM to present annual awards (Golden Heart, Thong Hy Huynh Memorial, and Environmental Recognition), followed by a reception. The regular meeting convened at 6:40 PM and included approval of a consent calendar, public hearings on weed abatement and an amendment to the Chiles Ranch Development Agreement, adoption of the updated investment policy, and formation of a subcommittee to review social responsibility criteria. Consent Calendar - Approved all items on the consent calendar (5-0) with Mayor Chapman abstaining on Item L (E Street Plaza parking lot ordinance) due to a business adjacency. Items included construction contracts for sewer, sports courts, playground, storm drain pump station, final maps, subdivision agreements, SB1 project list, firefighter MOUs, Mello-Roos tax rates, park maintenance taxes, parking lot ordinance, development impact fee report, comprehensive financial report, and a proclamation for Bike Month. Public Comments & Testimony - General Public Comment (Regular Meeting): Multiple speakers addressed the council on various topics. Adam Gottley invited the council to a congregation event. Guy Stevenson urged the city to invest in Naloxone (Narcan) to prevent overdose deaths. Amy Medavoy and Gil Medovoy spoke about the Israel-Palestine conflict, urging listening and peace. Ryan Masano gave a speech alleging a Jewish conspiracy. Mark Van Horn thanked the council for reducing polarization. Rodrigo and another speaker praised the council for allowing diverse views. A speaker criticized spending tax dollars on foreign conflicts. Prerecorded comments included Connor Gorman urging recovery of items during move-out season and Elaine Roberts Muster criticizing a legal opinion regarding the Senior Citizens Commission and Bretton Woods. Todd Adelman questioned the public process for SB1 funding. - Item 4 (Weed Abatement): No public comment. - Item 5 (Chiles Ranch DA): George Phillips, representing the applicant, spoke in support of the extension, noting the project's history and a pending sale to a builder. - Item 6 (Investment Policy): Six speakers (Nick Buxton, Erica, Alana, Ann Block, Dr. Jessica Shabot, Dean, Cheryl Futrell) urged divestment from companies like Caterpillar and General Dynamics, citing human rights violations and war crimes. They called for a subcommittee to review the policy and strengthen social responsibility criteria. Prerecorded comments from Connor Gorman and Jonathan London echoed similar concerns. City staff clarified that those two companies are no longer in the portfolio and that the city invests only in fixed-income securities. - Item 7 (Long-Range Calendar): Prerecorded comment from Connor Gorman urged a ban on police facial recognition technology and reconsideration of surveillance drones. Discussion Items - Item 5 – Third Amendment to Chiles Ranch Development Agreement: Senior Planner Eric Lee presented the staff recommendation for a five-year extension (to July 2029) with construction commencement by 2027, annual progress reports, and site maintenance. Applicants offered to increase the community enhancement contribution from $3,000 to $4,000 per market rate unit, but several councilmembers held out for $6,000 per unit, matching other recent developments. After a brief recess, the applicant agreed to $6,000 per market rate unit, with funds directed to the housing trust fund. The start date remained September 15, 2027. Council also discussed planning commission recommendations, including annual reporting and phase two map timing. The motion passed 5-0. - Item 6 – City of Davis Investment Policy: Finance Director Elena Adair presented the updated policy, which included changes per state law and auditor recommendations. Public comments raised concerns about investments in companies like Caterpillar and General Dynamics. Staff explained that the city's portfolio consists of short-term fixed-income securities and that the two mentioned companies were no longer held. Vice Mayor Vaitla proposed forming a subcommittee to review and potentially strengthen the social responsibility criteria (including the 51% revenue threshold). Council debated whether to refer to the Finance and Budget Commission or a council subcommittee. A motion to form a subcommittee (with Vice Mayor Vaitla and Councilmember Neville) passed 5-0. The underlying resolution to adopt the updated policy also passed 5-0. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar adopted 5-0 (Mayor Chapman abstained on Item L). - Weed abatement public hearing held; no protests were filed, and no further action was needed. - Chiles Ranch Development Agreement third amendment approved 5-0 with modifications: community enhancement fee increased to $6,000 per market rate unit, directed to the housing trust fund; construction must commence by September 15, 2027; annual progress reports required. - Investment Policy Resolution adopted 5-0. - Motion to form a council subcommittee (Vice Mayor Vaitla and Councilmember Neville) to review and recommend revisions to the investment policy's social responsibility criteria passed 5-0. - Councilmember Arnold noted that the Human Relations Commission will be asked to accelerate its work on a land acknowledgement. Councilmember Neville committed to providing a legislative tracking update at the June 18 meeting. Adjournment The meeting adjourned following item 7.