Link between Land Use and Fiscal Condition of the City
The fiscal analysis conducted by Economic & Planning Systems demonstrates the link between land use characteristics and the economic and fiscal well-being of the City. Land use and public policy priorities in the General Plan have broad implications for Fresno’s economic and fiscal well-being. As such, land use and physical development decision-making needs to be understood within this broader context of interdependence with many different and related outcomes and impacts. While this has always been true, it is particularly important in these times of economic stress and volatility in California. In the face of such challenges, the major question is whether future land use planning will continue historical expansionist patterns or whether a focus on distinct urban boundaries, infill development, and revitalization of existing urban areas is adopted.
Specifically, if this General Plan succeeds in improving Fresno’s quality of life by supporting strong public safety, other municipal services, good schools, an efficient transportation system, improved air quality, diverse housing opportunities, and attractive recreational and commercial amenities, it will attract and retain residents and employers who might otherwise choose other locations in the San Joaquin Valley or beyond. An improving employment base can, in turn, create a positive feedback loop by boosting property values and household incomes, and improving economic and social conditions. Achieving these quality of life factors will also boost the City’s tax base and enable further investment in the type of public services and infrastructure needed to maintain economic growth and quality of life.
Of course, the City’s economic and fiscal health are also affected by a variety of factors outside of its control, including the national business cycle, State and federal budget decisions, business climate, international trade, and the performance of key local industries. Thus, a key challenge during recessionary periods is to guard against a negative economic and fiscal spiral triggered by declining tax revenues and further exacerbated by disinvestment in critical public services and infrastructure that in turn reduces quality of life and ultimately the loss of valuable jobs and employed residents.
As part of General Plan implementation, the City should continually treat its land use, economic, and fiscal performance as fundamental and integrally linked components that over the long run will rise and/or fall together. The City, through the General Plan, will be able to approach, analyze, and evaluate contingent and related items holistically, rather than as distinct or independent items. For example, an over-emphasis on creating additional capacity for revenue generating land uses, such as “big-box” retail, will not necessarily improve the City’s long-term fiscal health if household incomes do not support growth in consumer demand or if new store sales “cannibalize” existing retail areas. Likewise, overly permissive land use or development standards may result