Public Meetings - Gulfport, Florida

Presentations Officer of the Year Recognition The meeting began with a proclamation honoring Officer Selena Ramos as the 2025 Officer of the Year. Chief Mary Farrand presented the award, recognizing Ramos's exemplary service since 2018, her role as a field training officer, and her selection by command staff. Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) Update Linda Fisher of Forward Pinellas presented findings from Task Two of the ADU study. Key points: - Projected ADU growth in Gulfport: 49 to 69 ADUs over 10 years in the policy direction areas (R1 and R1A districts outside the coastal high hazard area). This is based on St. Petersburg's experience, where ADU growth averaged 3%–4.2% of eligible parcels over 10 years. - Impacts on services and neighborhoods are expected to be minor due to the small numbers. Traffic from a few ADUs per street is negligible (5–7 trips/day per unit vs. 500–1,000 trips/day capacity). - Short-term rental concerns can be mitigated by owner-occupancy requirements, but pending state legislation (Senate Bill 48) may preempt that option. - The next task is drafting regulations with the Planning and Zoning Board. Stormwater Update Justin Keller of Advanced Engineering Design presented final recommendations based on council feedback from November 2025. Highlights: - Adaptation Plan (fully grant-funded, $250,000) to build on the vulnerability assessment. - BMP 3: 60th Street and 20th Avenue improvements ($2.5 million estimated). - Marina Tidal Flooding Reduction Project ($1.5 million, state appropriation requested). - Police/Fire Rapid Response Roadway Improvements ($3.75 million, state appropriation requested). - BMP 6: Climber Park pond option (alternative to piped option) and BMP 7: Wood Ibis bioswale with pump station ($2.2 million) to reduce flood duration. - BMP 8: Tomlinson Park – removing one ball field for expanded pond ($5.3 million). Councilmember Early expressed concern about losing a ball field and requested alternatives. - Council discussed the feasibility of floodable parks vs. permanent ponds, noting groundwater constraints. Senior Center Status Update Amy Bradlow of PBK Architects presented a three-phase renovation/expansion plan: - Phase One: 4,200 sq. ft. addition (two multipurpose rooms, lobby expansion, restrooms) – construction cost $3 million, total with soft costs $4 million. - Phase Two: Three options: (1) second floor over existing building (most expensive, 31% more than horizontal), (2) second floor over Phase One only (17% more), (3) all horizontal expansion (least expensive, $4.68 million). Horizontal option loses parking but avoids stair/elevator costs. - Phase Three: Renovation of existing building ($2.7 million construction). - The city intends to request a $3 million congressional appropriation from Representative Luna. Council consensus was to sign the letter supporting the request. No final decision on Phase Two options was needed; direction was to proceed with Phase One design. - Rachel, senior center director, noted the parking lot is often full and supported the horizontal option to minimize disruption. Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Update Interim Public Works Director Kendrix Anderson reported on the 49th Street corridor project: - Phase One (short-term): Intersection improvements at 5th Ave S, Fairfield Ave S, 11th Ave S, 15th Ave S, plus crosswalk upgrades, ADA ramps, LED lighting, and raised medians. Cost: $1.2 million ($500k city, $750k St. Pete). ILA approved in January 2026. - Demonstration project: $800k federal grant to test a three-lane repurposing (center turn lane) for 12 months. Temporary measures will collect data on traffic and safety. Can be removed if negative impacts occur. - Long-term options include either repurposing to three lanes or vertical traffic calming (not allowed in St. Pete's comp plan). - Councilmember Thanos raised concerns about crashes at 18th Avenue and 49th Street (wall at Trolley Market Square) and near-miss bike crashes. Anderson will discuss with St. Pete. Public Comments & Testimony - Nicole Thanos (resident) presented flowers to Vice Mayor April Thanos for her service. - Eileen Griffo (Tangerine Ave) expressed enthusiasm for the senior center project and announced upcoming fundraisers (Leslie Smith concert March 28, golf tournament April 4). - Rosemary Seawall (Town Shores) asked about brick road replacement and supported closing 27th Street for parking. - Christopher Butler Jones (50 Second St) presented a dossier arguing that Gulfport was historically a sundown town. He criticized the council for not using the term "sundown" in its resolution. He urged acknowledgment of historical exclusion. - Barney Waterberry (Tangerine Ave) sang a song about Gulfport. - Amy Costa (Wonderworks/Midtown Business Collective) reported a successful "For the Love of Gulfport" Pride event on Tangerine Greenway. - Matthew Galvin (15th Ave S) thanked Vice Mayor Thanos for her service. - Jonathan McCoachy praised Thanos's tenacity and urged council to continue open communication. - Regina Buscemi reminded of the Pink Flamingo Home Tour on Saturday. - Charlotte Downey (13th Ave S) thanked Thanos and council for their work. - A resident (27th Ave S) presented a draft resolution to continue the 287G agreement with ICE "under protest," citing coercive state threats. He argued that the training costs and secrecy justify protest. - Angie Bredenberg invited attendees to a post-meeting party at North End Tap House. - Julie Jacobi (49th St S) opposed two proposed charter amendments limiting leases to five years and requiring fair market value, arguing they would harm non-profit clubs like Boca Ciega Yacht Club and Gulfport Yacht Club. - Wolfgang Dininger (Beachway Park) announced a community cleanup on March 7 and a "Swap and Drop" event on April 11. - Christine Crosby (Baywood Point Dr) supported the yacht clubs and thanked Thanos. - Jennifer Webb (17th Ave S) gave a legislative update: ADU bills being combined, sovereign immunity increase to $500,000, and property tax discussions. She urged contacting state representatives. - E-comments: Included questions about 287G liability, Lincoln Cemetery annex petition, one-way street safety, and marina AR portfolio delinquency. Discussion Items - Council discussed the 287G program. Vice Mayor Thanos estimated training costs at $20,000 for seven officers and expressed desire to rescind the agreement, but acknowledged legal complications. She supported the "under protest" resolution. - Councilmember Shaw delivered a tribute to women in Gulfport's history for Women's History Month. - Councilmember Jackson promoted the Pink Flamingo Home Tour on March 7. - Mayor Love clarified that brick streets are replaced with bricks if disturbed. She announced a Traffic Flow Workshop on March 26 and encouraged public participation. Key Outcomes - ADU Study: Council accepted the impact assessment. Staff will proceed with drafting regulations for Planning and Zoning Board review. - Stormwater: Council approved pursuing the Adaptation Plan grant application and supported continued work on BMPs 3, 6, and the Police/Fire project. No final funding decisions were made. - Senior Center: Council reached consensus to sign a letter requesting $3 million in congressional funds for Phase One. Direction was given to proceed with Phase One design; Phase Two options will be decided later. - Safe Streets: Phase One construction is expected to begin in 2026. The demonstration project timeline is 18–24 months after grant agreement execution. Council raised specific concerns about intersections that staff will address. - Public Comments: Council heard concerns about the 287G program and charter amendments; no immediate action was taken. Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:18 PM.

The Gulfport City Council held a workshop on February 26, 2026, dedicated to discussing the 287(g) agreement between the Gulfport Police Department (GPD) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The meeting included a presentation by Police Chief Rand, public comments from approximately 25 speakers, and council discussion. No vote or formal action was taken; the workshop was intended to inform the public and address concerns. Public Comments & Testimony - Courtney Perkepis (resident): Expressed hope that the council would listen and act, noting the lack of live streaming and calling silence consent to deportation. - Noah Peretz (Stetson Law student, resident): Asked the council to move to renege on the agreement, arguing immigration enforcement is federal, local resources should stay local, and the agreement erodes trust. - Richard Freed (resident): Proud second-generation American; implied the chief signed under pressure; later corrected by mayor regarding who signed. - Maria Augusto (South Pasadena resident): Quoted ICE whistleblower Brian Schwank about deficient training, stating ICE training is "deficient, defective, and broken," and urged withdrawal. - Matthew Gelvin (resident): Questioned the legal definition of sanctuary city and whether it is a threat or adjudicated; expressed concern about professionalism and referenced Minneapolis. - Casey McCormick (resident): Expressed full confidence in GPD and support for 287(g), arguing it is wise to align with federal law and not become a sanctuary city. - Christa Fairbrother (resident): Asked why opting out equals sanctuary city; noted GPD has no jail; questioned necessity of the agreement. - Ellen Briggs (resident): Opposed 287(g), citing governor overreach. - Kate Basin (St. Petersburg resident): Former state inspector; opposed, stating ICE lacks community trust and that law enforcement loses trust if they cooperate. - Karen Goldberg (resident): Supported 287(g) as "lesser of two evils" and trusts GPD. - Frankie (St. Pete resident): Opposed, noting task force model is harsher; agreement erodes community trust. - Gina Buscemi (resident): Questioned what would change since zero arrests in a year; urged caution. - Leo Gonzalez (Tampa, member of Tampa Bay Immigrant Solidarity Network): Opposed; stated immigrant families are scared and that over 70% of arrested immigrants have no criminal record; called the agreement a dragnet. - Lauren Stern (resident): Noted that public pressure led to the workshop; commented on fear and urged council to revoke. - Amy Costa (resident): Passionately opposed; referenced historical parallels to Nazi Germany; urged council to stand up for the voiceless. - Chris Oro (South Pasadena resident): Opposed; cited ICE atrocities and erosion of constitutional rights. - Rachel Dale (Seminole resident, patron): Expressed fear that people may not patronize businesses or show up to work due to risk of detention. - Laura Lee Wanger (resident): Opposed; gave example of unequal treatment based on skin color. - Eliza Sydney (resident): Highlighted health and education impacts; children not showing up to school due to fear. - Unnamed speaker (St. Pete resident, family connections): Called the agreement shameful and lacking transparency; not required since GPD has no jail. - Robert Combs (resident): Supported 287(g); argued it helps law enforcement and only affects those breaking law; opposed protecting criminals. - Mason Morvet (resident): Questioned whether the agreement is truly voluntary given Key West threat; asked about statute requiring "best efforts." - Town Shores (resident): Did not argue for rescission but called for transparency, citizen rights, and protection; criticized lack of public input before signing. - E-Comments (read by clerk): Three comments opposed 287(g): Isabel Sousa said it contradicts inclusion; Jeanette Sells cited budget strain after hurricanes; Connie Takic stated training is inadequate and abuses rights. Discussion Items - Police Chief Rand’s Presentation: Detailed the 287(g) timeline, state law (Fla. Stat. 908), Pinellas County participation (all 10 PDs and sheriff signed), training (40 hours online, 7 of 33 GPD officers trained, no cost), criteria for immigration inquiry (must be based on conduct, not race), and that GPD has processed zero cases since signing on Feb. 27, 2025. She clarified that ICE will not command GPD officers. - City Attorney’s Clarifications: Explained Key West case where attorney general threatened sanctuary city designation after attempted withdrawal; stated 287(g) is not mandatory under state law, but sheriff’s pressure was strong; noted that "best efforts" is the standard. - Councilmember Questions: Vice Mayor asked about cost of officer training (city manager could not provide dollar amount but said no extra cost); asked about warrantless entry authority (city attorney corrected that Florida does not use "bench warrant" for search warrants); discussed liability and future addendums. - Councilmember Shaw: Asked about funding for task force officers ($7,500 per officer and vehicle costs if assigned); clarified GPD is not on task force. Asked for definition of sanctuary city (city attorney cited Fla. Stat. 908.102). Asked about racial profiling (state law prohibits it). - Councilmember (unidentified): Expressed that public trust is high in GPD; stated that local police are preferable to ICE; argued that the agreement helps prevent ICE from coming to Gulfport. - Mayor’s Remarks: Noted the workshop was to answer public questions and address fear; stated she feels Gulfport is safer with the agreement; said she will not kick the sleeping bear; emphasized that she was elected to handle Gulfport issues, not national ones. Key Outcomes - No Vote or Decision: The workshop was informational; no motion or resolution was made. The mayor stated that the purpose was to "answer the public's comments and try and resolve some fear." The meeting adjourned without a directive. - Requests: Councilmember Shaw asked that any future addendums to the agreement come before the council with legal options. City attorney offered to prepare a memo on citizens' rights. - Public Sentiment: Majority of speakers opposed the 287(g) agreement; a few supported it. The council acknowledged the concerns but did not signal an intent to rescind.

The Gulfport City Council met on Tuesday, February 17, 2026, at 6:00 PM at City Hall. The meeting included a presentation on living shorelines, public comments, approval of two ordinances, three resolutions (one tabled), and several council reports. Key discussions centered on a proposed grant for shoreline restoration, a dispute over the Lions Club lease buyout, and preparations for a workshop on immigration enforcement. Consent Calendar - Item 6.a: Approved minutes from the February 3 and February 5, 2026 meetings unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Lauren Stern (55th Street, Gulfport Coastline Coalition) supported the living shoreline project and later criticized the Lions Club lease payout. - Amy Costa (28th Avenue South) reminded the public of the March 1 "For the Love of Gulfport" event. - Courtney Prokopis (15th Avenue South) requested detailed data (e.g., number of sworn officers, call types) ahead of the upcoming workshop on the 287(g) mandate, arguing the agreement exceeded the city manager's authority and urged the council to evaluate whether it serves the community's best interest. - Wolfgang Dininger (Beachway Park, Gulfport Grassroots) reported on cleanup efforts, noting a rise in cigarette butts on the beach and urging stronger enforcement of the no-smoking ordinance. - E‑Comments: Richard Freed complained about an ICE recruitment ad; Deborah Schubs demanded a legal opinion on a missing date on a cemetery annex petition; Sean Simpson (business owner) opposed a proposed one-way street plan affecting 29th Avenue South parking. Presentation on Passive Shorelines - Priscilla Kidder, a 40‑year Gulfport resident, presented a proposal for a hybrid living shoreline at Veterans Park. She requested council support to apply for a Tampa Bay Environmental Restoration Fund (TBERF) grant (annual budget $800,000; typical grants $25,000–$250,000, requiring a 1:1 in‑kind match). The project would include oyster domes, oyster bags, and shore grass to reduce erosion, filter stormwater, and protect the seawall. Phase 1 (design/permitting) would take 12 months; Phase 2 (construction) 4 months; Phase 3 (monitoring) 12 months. Council expressed enthusiastic support; no formal vote was needed, but consensus was clear. Discussion Items - City Manager Report: Provided a permitting update: 59 homeowner applications received, 20 issued, 5 awaiting payment. Commercial permits include several projects (e.g., Gulf Shores condominium, a restaurant at 2832 Beach Boulevard, a fitness center at PYCC). Councilmember Vice Mayor Thanos requested data on permit turnaround times and expressed concern about “concierge service” and misinformation. - Council Comments: Included updates on the Pink Flamingo Tour (March 7), Tree City USA recognition, solar rebate programs, the federal hurricane recovery grant ($50,000 per household, $813 million for Pinellas County), fish deaths at Wood Ibis pond, and a legislative report from Councilmember Shaw on property tax proposals, sovereign immunity, and local business tax issues. Mayor Love noted the potential merger of three planning councils into one Tampa Bay regional council. Ordinances – Second Reading & Public Hearings - Ordinance 2026-01 (Recovery Residences): Amended the zoning code to create procedures for certified recovery residences, complying with state law. Approved unanimously (5–0). - Ordinance 2026-02 (Residential Lighting Nuisance): Added residential lighting to the nuisance ordinance. Council discussed next steps to develop specific standards (lumens, height, etc.) with a new ordinance to be drafted by the city attorney within 60 days. Approved unanimously (5–0). Resolutions - Resolution 2026-08 (Summer Rec Fees): Adopted a fee schedule for the 2026 Children’s Summer Recreation Program. Council noted the program is affordable and praised no increase. Approved unanimously (5–0). - Resolution 2026-09 (Water Valves): Authorized a contract with Colt Services, LLC for potable water insert valves on the 58th Street Roadway Project. Approved unanimously (5–0). - Resolution 2026-10 (Lions Club Lease Payout): Authorized payment of $227,500 (50% of an MAI appraisal valuing the building at $455,000) to the Gulfport Lions Club per lease terms. After extensive debate, Council tabled the item to ask the appraiser to verify assumptions (building age, depreciation, flood damage, and comparable sales). The matter will return at the March 3 meeting. Key Outcomes - Living Shoreline Grant: Council informally supported Ms. Kidder’s grant application; she will proceed with city staff. - Ordinances 2026-01 and 2026-02 both passed unanimously. - Resolutions 2026-08 and 2026-09 passed unanimously. - Resolution 2026-10 tabled unanimously for fact‑checking. - New Business: Councilmember Early introduced a proposal for a dog run at Tomlinson Park in Ward 4 (further details forthcoming). Councilmember Shaw invited the Gulfport Young Families Council to present a proposal for childcare during city meetings; consensus was reached to schedule a presentation. - Next Meeting: Regular council meeting scheduled for March 3, 2026.

The Gulfport City Council held a workshop on February 5, 2026, at 6:00 PM to explain the 10 charter amendment questions that will appear on the March 10, 2026 General Municipal Election ballot. City Clerk Teresa Carico presented each question, clarifying the meaning of a yes or no vote. The meeting was informational only; the Council did not express opinions or take votes. Public questions and comments were allowed after each question and at the end. Discussion Items - Process Overview: The Charter Review Committee was appointed in May 2025, met bi-weekly for 12 meetings through October 15, 2025, and presented recommendations to Council on October 21, 2025. After two readings (November 4 and December 2, 2025), Ordinance 2025-12 was approved, and the ballot questions were submitted to the Supervisor of Elections by the December 9 deadline. - Question 1 – Limiting Leases of City-Owned Property to Five Years: The current charter allows leases up to 30 years. A yes vote would reduce the maximum lease term to five years. A no vote leaves the 30-year maximum unchanged. - Public questions raised concerns about capital recovery for lessees (e.g., yacht clubs) and the lack of a city plan if leases cannot be renewed. City Manager O'Reilly noted that payout clauses could be negotiated in lease agreements, and the Council would decide future use. The City Clerk stated the recommendation came from citizen feedback through the Charter Review Committee. - Question 2 – Leases Required at Fair Market Value: Currently, the charter does not specify lease pricing. A yes vote would require all leases of city-owned real property to be based on fair market value determined by a licensed appraiser. A no vote leaves no such requirement. - Public commenters questioned how fair market value could be determined for unique waterfront properties with restricted uses (e.g., yacht clubs that cannot be sold or redeveloped). Jonathan McCoachy argued the concept is “fatally flawed” because an appraiser would need to know the allowed use. Council clarified that fair market value would set a minimum rent, and other terms could be negotiated. The City Manager noted that only the two yacht clubs are currently under long-term leases; other properties (e.g., athletic fields) are under recreational use agreements and would not be affected. - Question 3 – Three-Year Terms for Council Members: Currently council members serve two-year terms. A yes vote would change future terms to three years. The election for Wards 1 and 3 on the same ballot would still be for two-year terms because the amendment would take effect later. - A late-arriving attendee asked about the origin; a council member (likely Vice Mayor Thanos) said other cities have longer terms, making three years more practical. - Question 4 – Term Limits (Three Consecutive Terms): A yes vote would limit council members (and the mayor) to three consecutive terms. No public questions. - Question 5 – Waiting Period After Three Terms: A yes vote would require a two-year waiting period before a former council member could run again for the same ward, unless no other candidate qualifies. No public questions. - Question 6 – Remove Criminal Misdemeanor Language: Currently, council members who direct staff or request appointment/removal of employees are guilty of a second-degree misdemeanor. A yes vote removes that criminal provision from the charter. City Manager O'Reilly explained that the criminal charge would still exist under state statute, but removal from the charter avoids requiring a conviction (which may not be prosecuted). Jennifer Webb asked about alignment with state law; the City Manager confirmed the change does not conflict. - Question 7 – Vacancy by Forfeiture of Office: A yes vote adds forfeiture of office (by majority vote of remaining council members) as a cause for vacancy, alongside death, resignation, or removal. No public questions. - Question 8 – Criteria for Forfeiture of Office: A yes vote establishes specific criteria: lack of qualifications (e.g., moving out of ward), conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude, or failure to attend three consecutive meetings or four meetings within 12 months (unless excused). A council member asked whether the council can override absences; the City Clerk confirmed that excused absences are allowed by majority vote, and the current charter’s language on excused absences remains unchanged. The change reduces the threshold from six meetings in 12 months to four. - Question 9 – Removal from Office by Magistrate: A yes vote allows removal of a council member for intentional, willful, flagrant, or continuous violations of the charter or adopted rules, after an independent magistrate hearing. A council member noted potential conflicts if Question 7 (forfeiture by majority vote) passes but Question 9 fails, or if Question 6 (criminal misdemeanor) remains. The City Manager said conflicts could be addressed through policies and procedures. A resident asked about the definition of an independent magistrate; the City Manager explained the city could use its existing magistrate or issue a request for qualifications. - Question 10 – Charter Review Every Five Years: Currently, a full review is required every 10 years. A yes vote would require a citizens’ committee every five years. Council clarified that council can still call for a review at any time, and the five-year clock would reset from the last full review (2025). No public questions. Public Comments & Testimony - Lenny Gukenheimer (5213 Dillet Avenue South) questioned the five-year lease limit, noting that yacht clubs have made investments and provide services like maintaining the basin and mangroves. He suggested a no vote. - Mary (not fully identified) asked how capital recovery would work under five-year leases and whether the city would absorb maintenance costs if lessees leave. She later questioned the feasibility of fair market value for waterfront properties with non-transferable use. She also expressed concern that non-profits (like Sea Scouts and youth sailing programs) could be displaced, losing community benefits. - Lee Nell (2157 29th Avenue) asked for the origin of the five-year lease idea; the City Clerk referred to charter review committee presentations on the city website. - Jonathan McCoachy argued that fair market value is “fatally flawed” for unique properties and that the city should be measured by quality of life, not business metrics. He later reiterated that the focus on financial benefit is misplaced. - Lauren asked which properties are affected (only the two yacht clubs) and whether the city has a process for selecting new lessees; the City Manager said leases require a council ordinance. - Regina asked if all city-owned properties could be leased; the City Manager said yes, but parks dedicated for recreation cannot be sold or leased. - Jennifer Webb asked about state statute alignment on the criminal misdemeanor question and about fair market value application. - Laura Oldaney (Ninth Avenue South) raised fiscal pragmatism, noting the casino (a major revenue source) was damaged by a hurricane and potential property tax cuts could hurt city finances. She encouraged residents to consider revenue impacts. - A council member (likely Councilmember Shaw or Early) corrected a public myth that leases are still $1/year, stating current leases are $2,000/month. - Julie (not further identified) reminded attendees of voter registration deadlines: February 9 to register, February 26 to request a mail ballot via votepinellas.gov. Key Outcomes - The meeting was purely informational; no votes or decisions were made. - Voters will decide all 10 charter questions on the March 10, 2026 ballot. - Council members emphasized they are not giving opinions and encouraged residents to inform themselves and vote. - The City Clerk’s website (cityclerk.gulfport-fl.gov) contains full details, including charter review presentations and sample ballots. - Voter registration deadline: February 9, 2026. Mail ballot request deadline: February 26, 2026.

The Gulfport City Council met on Tuesday, February 3, 2026, at 6:00 PM at City Hall. The agenda included a proclamation recognizing 211 Day, a presentation by Mayor Love on downtown traffic circulation and parking, public comment on topics including the city's ICE agreement and proposed lease charter amendments, and votes on a residential lighting ordinance and a resolution affirming Gulfport as an inclusive city. Presentations - Proclamation – First Contact (211 Day): Mayor Love proclaimed February 11, 2026, as National 211 Day. Councilmember Jackson presented the proclamation to Sasha St. Felix, Director of First Contact (formerly 211 Tampa Bay Cares). The proclamation noted that 211 responded to over 62,000 calls, texts, emails, and online requests from Pinellas County residents in 2025. - Mayor Love – Downtown Traffic Flow, Parking, and Speed Limits: Mayor Love presented an unscientific proposal aimed at increasing pedestrian and bike safety, and adding parking without constructing a garage. Key elements included converting 54th Street (southbound) and 56th Street (northbound) to one-way, along with several avenues between 54th and 56th (29th, 31st eastbound; 30th, Dellette westbound); adding angled parking; lowering speed limits on Beach, Shore, 56th, and 54th to 20 mph; establishing designated handicap and golf cart parking; and adding 15-minute parking spots. The Mayor requested consensus to hold a public workshop on March 26 to gather public input. Council members expressed general support for starting the conversation. Consent Calendar - Item 6.a: The meeting minutes from January 20, 2026, were approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Jennifer Dons: Proposed scheduling regular pre-planned workshop days to allow more community input on specific topics. - Charlotte Downey: Provided an open letter to the council urging them to formally affirm that city police officers are under no obligation to participate in illegal or unconstitutional actions with ICE agents, referencing the city’s 287(g) agreement. - Lewis Stevens (Kingdom Changer Church): Introduced his church located behind Boca Ciega High School and expressed interest in partnering with the city. - Laura Oldeney: Asked the council to create a system ensuring staff actions, such as signing the ICE agreement, do not blindside the council or residents. - Eileen (Gulfport Senior Center Foundation): Reported on the success of recent fundraising events and promoted upcoming activities, including Foundation Fridays and a comedy show. - Jennifer Webb (Gulfport Merchants Chamber): Promoted a series of local events including the Mademoiselle Paris ribbon cutting and the Pink Flamingo Tour of Homes. - Amy Costa (Wonderworks): Announced the “For the Love of Gulfport” event was rescheduled to March 1. - Beth Birkabine and Dilly Jacoby: Expressed strong concern about potential charter amendment referendum questions regarding “fair market value” for city leases, fearing it could drive out long-standing non-profit organizations like the Gulfport Little League and the yacht clubs. - Sam (Lee): Condemned the city for what he characterized as weaponizing government against him over a seven-year period and called the “Inclusive City” resolution a “sham.” - Wolfgang Dininger (Gulfport Grassroots): Promoted upcoming community cleanups. - E-comments: Comments from Deborah Schufs (regarding public records) and Margaret Tober (regarding marina accounts and utility billing) were read into the record. Ordinances - Item 7.a – Ordinance 2026-02 (Residential Lighting Nuisance): The council held its first reading of an ordinance adding residential lighting to the city’s nuisance code. City Manager Nichols explained this was a first step to establish lighting as a code enforcement matter, with a more comprehensive ordinance on light intensity and height expected later. The ordinance passed on a vote of 3 to 2 (Councilmembers Early and Jackson opposed). Resolutions - Item 8.a – Resolution 2026-06 (Sunsetting the Senior Citizens Advisory Committee on Aging): The resolution passed unanimously. Sunsetting the committee allows its members to operate without the constraints of Florida’s Sunshine Law, enabling more flexible planning. - Item 8.b – Resolution 2026-07 (Affirming Commitment to be an Inclusive City): The council adopted a resolution affirming the city’s commitment to inclusivity and acknowledging its history. Following a suggestion from the public, the title was amended from “all-inclusive” to “inclusive.” The amended resolution passed 4 to 1 (Vice Mayor Thanos opposed). Key Outcomes - Votes: Consent minutes approved (unanimous); Lighting ordinance passed first reading (3-2); Senior Committee sunset resolution approved (unanimous); Inclusive City resolution approved (4-1). - Directives: Councilmember Shaw was given consensus to add future discussion items regarding senior transportation (GEMS/Looper) to council meetings and a neighborhood survey for a potential Tangerine Avenue one-way conversion. - Upcoming Workshops: Mayor Love noted a workshop on the city’s ICE 287(g) agreement was scheduled for February 26, and a charter review workshop for the February 5 meeting.

On Tuesday, January 20, 2026, the Gulfport City Council met at 6:00 PM at City Hall for a regular meeting that lasted over four hours. The meeting included presentations, extensive public comment on the city's 287G agreement with ICE, adoption of several resolutions and ordinances, and discussion of future policies on lighting, e-bikes, inclusivity, and downtown planning. Consent Calendar - The Council unanimously approved the January 6, 2026 meeting minutes (Item 6.a). - Resolution No. 2026-02 authorizing the purchase of Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) gateway equipment from Neptune Technology Group was approved unanimously. - Resolution No. 2026-03 authorizing a contract with Kirms Communications LLC for installation of AMI poles and hardware was approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Amy Trippy (Gulfport resident) questioned why the 287G agreement was signed in February 2025 without City Council or public input. She requested a council review and possible reconsideration. - Karen Cotler opposed the 287G agreement, stating ICE has shown disregard for civil rights and that police should not act as a conduit to ICE. - Kate Seidman expressed shock about ICE in Gulfport and urged the council to act locally against federal immigration enforcement. - Donovan Nickel provided updates on e-bike safety studies and pending state legislation (House Bill 4243). - Scott Lindy (Gulfport Merchants Chamber) highlighted upcoming community events and praised the first Art Opening at the Welcome Center. - Emily Smith (Largo) denounced the 287G agreement, describing ICE actions as violent and unconstitutional. - Mary Winstead (Gulfport resident of 36 years) called for acknowledgement of Gulfport's history as a sundown town, saying apology is not needed but recognition is. - Charlotte Downey urged council to rescind the 287G agreement to protect the police department from unconstitutional activities. - Julia Bull criticized the city's decision to reduce funding to the local newspaper (GABBER) and reallocate advertising dollars to Gulfport Living, a publication owned by a global investment firm. She said this defunds local journalism and excludes one-third of households. - Christine Pough urged support for the GABBER, warning that losing city funding could mean the paper's demise. - Joe Senia supported the GABBER and asked that the mayor's column be published in it, criticizing the council for following a playbook similar to national attacks on free press. - Ben Atherton-Zeman (clergy) supported the GABBER and called for dissolving the 287G agreement, referencing Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s call and the murder of Renee Good. - Courtney Prokoppus detailed the end of Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and described ICE's Operation Tidal Wave in Central Florida, asking the council to end the 287G agreement. - Laura (last name not given) supported the GABBER and acknowledged Gulfport's sundown history, noting the lack of diversity in the room. - Lauren Stern provided context on 287G: contracts are not mandatory, the state uses fear and intimidation, and the Trump administration relies on local collaboration. She urged rescinding the agreement and compared it to early steps of historical persecution. - Eliza Sydney (young family) said the 287G agreement does not make them feel safer and asked for courage over fear. - Matthew Gelvin asked the council to sever the link between the town and larger federal immigration operations. - Amy Costa urged rescinding the 287G agreement and called for fairness in advertising support to all publications. She also promoted upcoming community events. - Wolfgang Dinninger (Gulfport Grassroots) reported on beach cleanups: 32 volunteers collected 242 pounds of trash on January 10, 2026. He announced future cleanups including Lincoln Cemetery on February 7. - Susan Gore asked how the 287G agreement happened without council knowledge and suggested a workshop to inform citizens of their rights. E-comments: The City Clerk reported 77 e-comments, with 76 opposing the 287G agreement (12 from Gulfport residents, 65 non-residents). One comment about Lincoln Cemetery. Council voted to read only Gulfport resident comments and the Lincoln Cemetery comment. Those read urged ending the agreement, raising concerns about trust, safety, and constitutional violations. Discussion Items - Lighting Draft Ordinance (Item 9.a): Council discussed a draft nuisance lighting ordinance. Members expressed concerns about subjectivity and overreach (HOA-like). The Mayor noted the urgency to address light pollution as new tall homes are built. Council consensus directed staff to split the ordinance: (1) pass a nuisance-focused section prohibiting lights shining onto adjacent properties and public rights-of-way, and (2) return later with a comprehensive lighting ordinance covering intensity, height, and fixture requirements. - E-Bikes (Item 9.b): Council tabled discussion pending state legislation (HB 4243) which may preempt local rules. Members noted separate issues regarding non-electric conveyances in parks. - Inclusivity Resolution (Item 9.c): Council debated whether to include an acknowledgment of Gulfport's sundown town history. Councilmember Shaw proposed two new whereas clauses. After discussion, Council agreed to add: "Recognizes the importance of acknowledging our history, including moments when discrimination or exclusion occurred as an essential step in strengthening trust, healing, and building a more just and welcoming community." The city attorney will incorporate this language into the resolution and bring it back for a vote. - Considerations for Downtown Area (Item 9.d): Mayor Love presented observations from prior community forums ("Gulfport on the Edge" and "Gulfport 2050"). Key consensus themes: need for affordable housing, environmental resilience (sea level rise, walkability, bike/pedestrian safety), and preserving Gulfport's character. She announced she will present a plan for parking and traffic flow at the next meeting. Key Outcomes - Ordinance 2026-01 (Certified Recovery Residences): Approved on first reading (unanimous). The ordinance complies with state mandates and establishes certification, permitting, and revocation procedures for such facilities. - Resolution 2026-04 (FEMA Community Disaster Loan): Approved (unanimous). Authorizes the city manager to borrow up to $5 million as a line of credit to backstop revenues during hurricane recovery, with any drawdown requiring Council approval. - Resolution 2026-05 (Conditional Use for Church, C25-02): Approved (4-1, Vice Mayor Thanos dissenting). The resolution allows a conditional use for a church at 54th Street, subject to conditions including a parking agreement with adjacent Sunflower School, fire inspection, and business tax receipt compliance. - New Business: Mayor Love proposed a workshop on the 287G agreement to provide accurate information and address community fears. Council tentatively scheduled the workshop for February 2026, with further details to be finalized. - Discussions on Lighting and E-Bikes: Council gave staff direction to proceed with a two-step lighting ordinance and to table e-bike regulation pending state law.

The Gulfport City Council held a workshop on January 8, 2026, at 6:00 PM at Gulfport City Hall to gather community input on the future of the marina parcel previously leased by the Lions Club. The building, damaged by floods and containing asbestos, will be demolished. The Coast Guard station is also slated for demolition. No votes or decisions were made; the meeting was purely for listening and idea collection. Public Comments & Testimony - Beth Birkabine (24-year resident, BCYC member): Thanked council for the holiday lighted boat parade. Emphasized the critical need to preserve the small boat launch area behind the Lions Club for youth sailing and small boat programs (sunfish, prams, kayaks, paddleboards). Noted that this beach-style launch is rare in Pinellas County and essential for sailboats that cannot be launched from fixed docks. Stated that the launch area is separate from the hoist and slip facilities used by BCYC’s adult school boats. - Christine Crosby (28-year resident, Baywood Point): Shared personal story of grandchildren taking private sailing lessons at that beach, calling it unique and ideal for children. - Chuck (resident since 2019, near the property): Supported keeping the area for small boats, limited motors, and no heavy vehicular traffic. Mentioned 17 members now have sunfish using that beach. Also noted wildlife and mangroves. - Paula Duby (Baywood Point, BCYC member): Highlighted that the cove is a manatee birthing and hurricane hole area. Requested that the launch area be open to the general public for small boats (sailboats, paddleboards, kayaks), not just clubs. Noted parking available nearby. - Judy Kuhn (48th Street South, marina district): Urged flood mitigation through permeable surfaces and salt-tolerant native plants (sea grape, mangroves, buttonwood). Supported preserving small boat access but wanted the rest of the area to become green space to reduce flooding. - Guy O'Connor (Gulfport resident, continuing Beth's statement): Asked the city to formally recognize the small boat launch area, guarantee shared access for BCYC and Gulfport Yacht Club, and allow limited on-site storage with BCYC as steward. Also encouraged expansion of dry storage (income for city) and adding marina amenities like restrooms, but discouraged paving or heavy construction. Offered to help with appraisal issues and to cooperate on re-establishing the marina. - Jonathan McCoachy (28-year resident, 300-400 feet from site): Advocated for the entire area east of Tift and south of 29th to be marine-focused. Supported public access for small boats, a marine advisory committee, restrooms for marina tenants, and exploring partnerships with Tampa Bay Watch or USF for educational use. Suggested asking experts what to do with the 4,000 sq ft building site before demolition. - John Hogan (Upton Street, marina district): Proposed a small bar and grill for boaters and the neighborhood, arguing it would generate revenue and bring people. Believed parking is sufficient and it could coexist with small boat launch. - Joel Hine (Past Commodore, Boca Ciega Yacht Club): Asked to preserve small boat access and partner with existing clubs (like BCYC and Gulfport Yacht Club) who can manage the area responsibly. Compared to other area sailing programs (St. Pete Sailing Center $130/quarter, Clearwater $175/year, BCYC $190/quarter) which provide structured access. Noted that these clubs assume liability and insurance costs. - Bob Fechner (Commodore, Gulfport Yacht Club, 5626 25th Ave S): Highlighted club’s 90-year history in Gulfport (2028). Club races 5-15 boats twice a month, with regattas expecting 30 boats. All boats are small catamarans/monohulls needing beach launch. Supported public access but stressed continued use for both clubs. Favored a marine advisory council. - Fred Fortis (3049 DuPont Street S, Gulfport Yacht Club): Stressed the area is the only spot for hand-launching catamarans and dinghies. Expressed concerns about full public access leading to security issues for boats and city maintenance costs. Suggested keeping it quasi-public. - Kimberly McAllenis (Upton Street): Emphasized environmental impact must be paramount, especially after hurricanes. Disagreed with exclusive club access; said if public, it should be fully public. Called for thoughtful planning balancing environment, community, and finances. - Albert Risenberg (19th Avenue S, sailor with sunfish): Noted that yacht clubs have locked up much of the shoreline. Advocated for a simple public park/launch area that is permeable and low-maintenance, open to everyone without membership fees. - Paula (Del Rio Way): Supported a marine council. Opposed any additional traffic (restaurant/bar) as Del Rio Way is already congested during regattas. Supported public small craft access but not exclusive club use. - Karen Schwartz (Delaware Avenue S, marina district): Opposed any development; wanted the area to return to mangroves and permeable surfaces. Suggested portable restrooms and food trucks instead of permanent structures. - Lenny Gokenheimer (5213 Delette Avenue S): Supported restrooms on wheels (like a mobile trailer) that can be removed during storms. Favored a council to manage the area and enforce rules. - Deb Atkins (452 27th Avenue, marina district, 11-year resident): Opposed Ferris wheel or commercialization. Supported open public launch (not membership-based) and environmental focus, but concerned about traffic from boat trailers. - Lauren Stern (Ward 4, reading for Gulfport Coastline Coalition): Urged keeping land free, public, and rewilded; using green infrastructure; and exploring designation as a wildlife release area. Supported portable restrooms. - Julie Jacoby (49th Street, 24-year homeowner): Supported continued use by both yacht clubs but also public access. Noted parking and trailer access must be considered if public launch allowed. Opposed restaurant. Suggested expanded kayak/paddleboard storage for revenue. - Margaret Tober (written comment): Demolish the building and create a living shoreline, or demolish and sell the property. - Brian Durr (written comment, read by council): Suggested dog park and beach, public park with kayak storage rental, partial expansion of dry dock, shared club facility, or short-term camper site for storm-displaced residents. Opposed amphitheater, hotel, commercial, selling land, or restricting beach access. Also suggested covered picnic pavilions at the Coast Guard site. Discussion Items - Mayor: Opened meeting emphasizing listening mode. Noted that demolition of the Lions Club building is imminent (January) and the city owns the land. Mentioned the living shoreline project at the point is pending a submerged land lease but moving forward. - Councilor (unidentified): Heard from constituents wanting a water park but is open to listening. - Vice Mayor: Heard various suggestions; noted building must come down due to asbestos. Open to portable restrooms (earlier quote $70k for a unit). Favored public boat launch, keeping it low-maintenance and natural, and a marine advisory committee. Opposed commercial use like bar/grill due to floodproofing costs and landlord complications. - Councilor (second): Supported passive park and small boat access. Heard from businesses opposing competition. Mentioned support for sunset park at Clam Bayou, splash pads not feasible near shore due to aquifer, possible bike rental expansion from marina to downtown. Noted eagle and kingfisher sightings. - Mayor: Summarized consensus: no commercialization, keep public access, both clubs and public can use launch, environmental protection, restrooms (whichever most cost-effective), a small fenced playground for children since the area lacks one, permeable surfaces, and a marine advisory board (but need to decide if formal advisory board under sunshine or volunteer group). - City Manager: Provided updates: market value appraisal ordered for Lions Club buyout; plans to go out to bid for South Basin and casino dock within two weeks; demolition of both buildings likely in January; Coast Guard demolition cost similar to Lions Club (around $40,000). Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were taken. The council will use the input gathered to guide future plans for the marina parcel. - The Lions Club building and Coast Guard station are scheduled for demolition in January 2026, pending appraisal and council action on the buyout. - The South Basin and casino dock projects will go out for bid within two weeks. - The living shoreline project at the point remains pending a submerged land lease from the federal government. - A marine advisory committee or volunteer group will be considered; council advised to determine structure (formal vs. informal) before proceeding. - The council emphasized that any development must prioritize environmental protection, flood mitigation, permeable surfaces, and public access for small non-motorized boats, while avoiding commercialization and additional traffic in the neighborhood.

The City of Gulfport Planning and Zoning Board convened on January 7, 2026 (officially recorded as 2026-01-07 11:00:00+00:00) at Gulfport City Hall. Chairperson Cowan presided, with members Gonzalez Hastings, Kelly, McCoachy, and Vice Chair Hanrahan present. City Attorney Salzman and Deputy Clerk Hartman were also in attendance. The agenda included the approval of minutes, a quasi-judicial conditional use application for a church, a proposed ordinance on Certified Recovery Residences, and other business. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The board unanimously approved the minutes from the June 4, 2025, meeting with a correction to identify the body as the Planning and Zoning Board rather than the City Council. Public Comments & Testimony - Non-Agenda Items: No members of the public spoke on non-agenda items. - Application C25-02 (Church) Public Comment: - Mr. Bailey, a resident across the street, opposed the application, expressing strong concerns over insufficient parking. He calculated the narrow lot could only fit approximately 10 car spaces (90 feet divided by 9 feet per space) and cited city code requiring 1 space per 3 seats for a church (15 spots required for 45 seats) and 1 space per 150 square feet for educational training. - Mr. David Kohler, an adjacent resident, also opposed the application, concerned that the broad definition of a church could allow for event space, weddings, and other functions, increasing traffic and parking demand. Discussion Items - Quasi-Judicial Procedure: City Attorney Salzman explained the due process rules for the conditional use hearing, emphasizing the need for competent substantial evidence and the disclosure of any ex parte communications. - Application C25-02: Quickshaft USA, LLC – Church Conditional Use: The applicant sought a permit for a church (Vision Disciples of Ministry) and related training facilities. The building was originally a church in 1958 and later a preschool. The property was subdivided in June 2024, separating the church building from the adjacent Sunflower School. - Staff Position: Staff stated that since the building predates the current zoning code and the capacity (45 seats) is not increasing, existing parking standards do not apply. The primary new building code requirement is an upgraded sprinkler system. - Board Deliberation: The board discussed the parking deficit, the applicant's absence, and the potential for expanded operating hours. The consensus was to recommend approval with strict conditions regarding parking and hours. - Proposed Ordinance 22-6.14: Certified Recovery Residences: The board reviewed a state-mandated ordinance allowing these residences in all districts. - Staff Position: Staff explained the city cannot ban the use but can enforce standard land development regulations such as setbacks, building coverage, height, and parking through site plan review. - Board Concerns: Members discussed the lack of specific occupancy limits in the state framework, the preemption of local home rule, and the potential for for-profit operators creating high-density situations. The board sought to recommend approval while maximizing local oversight through the site plan review process. - Other Business: Board Member Gonzalez Hastings led a discussion on density calculations, the interaction of the Future Land Use Map with zoning districts, and the location of the High Hazard Area. An anecdote was shared about a St. Petersburg homeowner whose property taxes rose by approximately $3,000 per year ($453 per month) after adding an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU), raising concerns about true affordability. An update was given on a nearby 5-acre waterfront property with a demolition permit application filed for a proposed 25-unit multi-family development. Key Outcomes - Minutes Approved: The June 4, 2025, meeting minutes were approved unanimously with a correction. - Application C25-02 (Church Use): The board voted unanimously (5-0) to recommend approval to the City Council. The recommendation was conditioned upon the applicant: 1) maximizing on-site parking, 2) executing a formal shared parking agreement with the neighboring property owner, and 3) ensuring operating hours do not conflict with the school's schedule. The board noted the applicant's absence and expects her to address these conditions directly to the council. - Ordinance 22-6.14 (Certified Recovery Residences): The board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the ordinance to the City Council. The board explicitly recommended that all future applications undergo a full site plan review by the Site Plan Review Committee, including Fire Department sign-off on occupancy and safety. - Administrative Reminders: Board members were reminded to file their Form 1 (Financial Disclosure) by the July 1, 2026 deadline.

The Gulfport City Council held its first meeting of 2026 on January 6. Agenda items included presentations on the holiday decoration contest, the Senior Citizens’ Advisory Committee’s walking trail, and the final Vulnerability Study. The council took action on consent items, discussed storm recovery permit fees, debated zoning density changes, and addressed long-term resilience planning. Presentations - Holiday Decoration Contest: Mayor Love awarded commercial winner Gary King and recognized general theme winners Eddie Smith and Patrick Mortimer for their extensive holiday display and their Operation Santa toy drive contributions. - Senior Citizens’ Advisory Committee: Caron Schwartz requested council consider sunsetting Resolution 92-12 to ease quorum and Sunshine Law constraints. Bradley Bruner reported on the Discover Gulfport Walking Trail system, detailing the completed Red (1.3 mi) and Yellow (3.3 mi) trails and future plans for QR codes, storyboards, and brochures. - Vulnerability Study (Advanced Engineering & Design): Justin Keller provided a Watershed Management Plan update, noting the addition of nine total projects (including alternates at Clymer Park, Yolanda Park, and Wood Ibis Park property) to be priced by end of January. Cody Stewart presented the final Vulnerability Assessment (VA), analyzing 21 flood scenarios (sea level rise, storm surge, rainfall). The C-Score analysis identified high-risk critical assets: county lift stations, the casino, city hall, police, and fire stations. The firm recommended the city pursue a 100%-state-funded Adaptation and Implementation Plan and noted the city is now eligible for 50%-matched implementation project grants. Public Comments & Testimony - Dean Hay (Gulfport Environmental Team - GET): Announced a volunteer tree inventory training and walk on January 17 at the Neighborhood Center. - Laura Aldanay: Advocated for community education on the VA projections and asked the city to coordinate with Boca Ciega High School on upstream stormwater retention. - Bob: Requested consideration of temporary pumping measures as an interim safeguard while permanent stormwater solutions are developed. Discussion Items - Zoning Reclassification (Missing Middle Housing): Vice Mayor Thanos proposed a discussion on rezoning R1 districts citywide to R2 (or adjusting lot sizes) to allow duplexes and triplexes for increased affordable housing. Other council members expressed preference for completing the ADU ordinance first, citing limited staff time, the need for community input, and the settled nature of neighborhoods. The council agreed to prioritize ADUs before broader zoning density changes. - Permit Fee Relief: Mayor Love proposed waiving permit fees for original homeowners who are now demolishing and rebuilding after the 2024 storms. The council discussed eligibility criteria (homestead status, homeowner intent) and the financial impact on the city’s permitting contract. The City Manager was directed to research the feasibility and provide data on pending demolition permits. - Sundown Town Statement: Council reviewed a request for an acknowledgment regarding the city’s past. The City Attorney was directed to draft a statement recognizing historical practices and affirming the current commitment to inclusivity for council review. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar (Item 6a): Meeting minutes from December 2 and 16, 2025, approved (Unanimous). - Resolution 2026-01 (Item 8a): Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an interlocal agreement with St. Petersburg for 49th Street corridor intersection and safety improvements approved (Unanimous). - Directives: - City Attorney to draft a historical acknowledgment statement. - Staff to review permit fee waiver feasibility for storm-rebuild homeowners. - Council to advance ADU ordinance revisions before tackling broader zoning changes. - City Manager to pursue an Adaptation and Implementation Plan grant (100% state-funded). - Upcoming Events: Mayor Love announced a town hall on January 8 to gather resident input on the future of the marina property. The council reached consensus to waive Hickman Center fees for a League of Women Voters candidate forum (Jan 29) and permit a town hall at the Neighborhood Center for the tree inventory event (Jan 17). Operation Santa was reported to have assisted 352 children from 152 families.