Public Meetings - Hillsborough County, Florida

On August 28, 2026, the Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners held a special meeting to consider and vote on the Development and Funding Agreement, Guaranty, and Team Non-Relocation Agreement with the Tampa Bay Rays (StadCo) for a new ballpark at the Hillsborough College Dale Mabry Campus. After a presentation by county staff, public comment, and board discussion, the board voted 5-2 to approve the agreements, with an amendment setting the Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) at $60 million. Public Comments & Testimony - Opposition: Many speakers opposed the use of public funds for the ballpark, arguing that taxpayer money should be used for roads, infrastructure, public safety, and other essential services. Concerns were raised about the optics of subsidizing billionaires, the uncertainty of Amendment 3 (property tax referendum), and the lack of a finalized CBA with specific dollar amounts. Speakers also highlighted the displacement of Hillsborough College buildings and the juvenile detention facility. - Support: Supporters emphasized the economic impact ($34.8 billion direct impact, 5,000 annualized jobs), the catalytic effect on surrounding development (8–10 million square feet of mixed-use), the state's $180 million investment in the college, and the creation of a professional sports hub. They argued that the deal protects taxpayers through rent payments ($4 million/year with CPI), cost overrun coverage by the Rays, and a strong non-relocation clause. Discussion Items - Chair Hagan framed the vote as a choice between being a world-class community or losing a generational opportunity, noting that without the ballpark, the surrounding development would not occur. He defended the use of CIT funds, citing two legal opinions that found no prohibition in the ordinance or ballot language. - Commissioner Cohen highlighted improvements from the original MOU: rent increased from $0 to $4 million/year, the Rays' contribution rose from 50% to 62%, and the state committed $100 million to the Lithia Pinecrest Road project, reducing the county's CIT obligation. He argued that the deal expands the tax base and supports transit planning. - Commissioner Myers emphasized community benefits, affordable housing commitments, and workforce development opportunities through HCC. She called the vote a historic opportunity. - Commissioner Wistel (voted no) criticized the use of CIT funds for a stadium, the reliance on property tax reserves ($103 million), and the insufficient return to the county. He argued that the deal shifts risk to unincorporated taxpayers and that fire rescue services cannot be guaranteed. He also questioned the transparency and the rush to vote before Amendment 3. - Commissioner Cameron-Sapato (voted no) echoed opposition, citing constituent feedback that taxpayer money should not fund a stadium when roads and infrastructure are in need. - Commissioner Miller proposed an amendment to the motion, increasing the CBA from $50 million to $60 million, with 65% ($39 million) to the county and 35% ($21 million) to the city. He also required that 20% ($12 million) be front-loaded over four years ($3 million/year, split proportionally). The remaining $48 million would be defined in a binding payment schedule in the CBA. He expressed disappointment with the disproportionate share of tax increment revenue (based on millage rates) but ultimately supported the amended motion. Key Outcomes - Vote: The board approved the Development and Funding Agreement, Guaranty, and Team Non-Relocation Agreement by a vote of 5-2, with Commissioners Cameron-Sapato and Wistel voting no. - Motion Details: The motion, as amended, included: - Approval of the three documents in substantial form. - Authorization for the County Attorney to conform the documents to the City of Tampa's approved version and correct scriveners' errors. - A Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) totaling $60 million, with 65% ($39 million) allocated to Hillsborough County and 35% ($21 million) to the City of Tampa. - Front-loading: 20% ($12 million) of the CBA shall be paid in four equal annual installments of $3 million, distributed as $1.95 million to the county and $1.05 million to the city each year. - The remaining $48 million to be funded pursuant to a binding payment and performance schedule to be determined in the final CBA. - Conditions Precedent: Funding is subject to numerous conditions, including bond validation, satisfaction of CDD approval items, execution of a construction funds trust agreement, and verification of the Rays' financing (including MLB loan and equity commitments).

The Environmental Protection Commission (EPC) meeting was called to order at 2:30 PM. The invocation and Pledge of Allegiance were led by Commissioner Cameron Campeda. Roll call confirmed the absence of Commissioner Christine Miller. The agenda was approved unanimously. Consent Calendar - Agenda approved with a motion by Commissioner Corn, second by Commissioner Watson, carried 5-0. Discussion Items - Green Star Certification (Item 9A): Ken Sierra presented the Green Star Initiative, a certification program recognizing auto repair facilities that exceed environmental compliance. Twenty new facilities were certified, including Southeastern Freight Lines, Brandon Auto Mall (Alfa Romeo, Fiat, Cadillac), Courtesy Toyota, Morgan Import Motor Cars (seven dealerships and a training shop), Manheim Auctions, Jerry Ohm Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, Florida Detroit Diesel Allison, Honuswan Auto Care, and all five Hillsborough County Fleet Management facilities. Certificates were presented to representatives; Commissioner Bowles commended the county's own fleet participation. - Particulate Matter and Air Quality (Item 9B): Christian Rodriguez presented on PM10 and PM2.5, describing local sources (traffic, industry, port, construction, fires), health effects (respiratory and cardiovascular harm), and the county’s monitoring network of five sites. He noted the EPA lowered the annual PM2.5 standard from 12 to 9 µg/m³ in 2024, and the 2023-2025 design value for Hillsborough County was 7.5 µg/m³, below the standard. The role of Saharan dust and wildfires was discussed. Commissioners received the report with no questions. - Water Quality in Tampa Bay (Item 9C): Sam Alrabi presented the history of the EPC’s water monitoring program, including 261 stations, 2500 annual samples, 40,000 lab analyses, and $9.5 million in pollution recovery funds spent. He reported that water quality scores improved from the 40s in the 1970s to the 90s today. Current health concerns (dengue fever, vibrio vulnificus) were outlined. Commissioners expressed appreciation. Commissioner Bowles asked about inter-county coordination; Sam confirmed collaboration with the Agency on Bay Management and Tampa Bay Estuary Program. Commissioner Watson reiterated a call to allocate tourism development funds for seagrass restoration. Commissioner Coyne praised progress and advocated for opening the Courtney Campbell Causeway to improve circulation in Old Tampa Bay. Commissioner Wolfsburg reported a successful resolution of a camera issue mentioned at a previous town hall. - Executive Director Report: Janet reported staff participation in Juneteenth events, town hall meetings, an appreciation luncheon hosted by Commissioner Myers, conferences, a Port Tampa Bay harbor tour, and the start of annual seagrass and benthic monitoring. She noted the passing of Rick Kirby, a former EPC employee, and welcomed prayers for him and for Lorna Horton's brother. The next meeting is scheduled for October 22, 2026. Key Outcomes - Agenda approved 5-0. - No formal votes or decisions were taken on the informational presentations; the meeting consisted of reports and discussion only.

The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners held a quarterly awards and recognition ceremony on August 26, 2026, to celebrate the work and accomplishments of county employees, departments, and community partners. The ceremony honored achievements in emergency management accreditation, fire rescue leadership, animal welfare, communications, and environmental science. Emergency Management Accreditation - Commissioner Cohen presented the first recognition to the Hillsborough County Fire Rescue Office of Emergency Management for earning full accreditation from the Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP). The accreditation was awarded after a multi-year evaluation demonstrating compliance with all 73 EMAP standards covering administration, planning, mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery, continuity, communications, logistics, training, exercises, and public information. The Office of Emergency Management led a countywide effort over more than two years involving county departments, constitutional offices, municipalities, public safety agencies, health care partners, nonprofit organizations, private sector stakeholders, and state and federal partners. Commissioner Cohen noted that she witnessed the team in action during real emergencies, including the 2024 hurricanes. Fire Rescue Chief (unnamed in this segment) thanked the team, especially CK Moore, and stated that the accreditation means the county has coordinated and partnered with all departments to provide citizens with the best emergency management team. Fire Rescue Chief of the Year - Commissioner Bowles recognized Fire Chief Doherty for being named the Florida Fire Chiefs Association State Fire Chief of the Year. Commissioner Bowles highlighted Chief Doherty's more than 25 years of experience, including roles in Georgia and Tampa Fire Rescue before joining Hillsborough County Fire Rescue in 2016. He was named the seventh fire chief in county history in December 2023. Commissioner Bowles noted that Chief Doherty thrives in leadership and values frontline perspectives. Chief Doherty accepted the award, emphasizing that it reflects the entire organization of over 1,400 employees and the support from county partners such as the county attorney's office, HR, public works, and pet resources. He stated, "This award without a doubt is a credit to Hillsborough County as a whole." Pet Resource Center Awards (National Association of Counties Achievement Awards) - Commissioner (unnamed, likely the same commissioner who introduced pet resources) presented two awards from the National Association of Counties (NACo) 2026 Achievement Awards to the Pet Resource Center (PRC) and its partners. - Partnership with Rescue Me Tampa (RMT): Recognized for increasing live placement rates of dogs and cats to more than 95%, promoting pets with special needs in real time on social media, and strengthening the volunteer corps. Specific examples included a canine influenza outbreak in June 2024 affecting 300 dogs, which were quarantined off-site for about one month, and a summer heat wave where RMT provided a snow cone company to give treats to dogs and volunteers. The award was for Civic Education and Public Information and Volunteers. Scott Trabowski, director of pet resources, and Ann Malone with Rescue Me Tampa spoke. Malone stated, "This award proves that previous adversaries can become collaborating partners when we share the same goal, which is to save lives." She noted Rescue Me Tampa has more than 70,000 followers and that through deadline dogs this year they have counted 11 lives saved. - Neurodiverse Volunteer Program: Recognized for innovation in volunteerism. The program has 57 young people volunteering more than 3,100 hours each year. Last year, these volunteers contributed over 3,000 hours of care, resulting in savings of over $102,000. The program is in its fifth year. Chelsea Waldecky, Division Director of Veterinary and Behavioral Services, accepted the award. She noted that PRC cares for more than 15,000 animals each year and that the program partners with Pepin Academies. She acknowledged volunteer John, his family, and Ms. Janelle Kilby, director of transition at Pepin Academies. HTV Content Marketing Award - Commissioner Myers presented the Reagan PR Daily Award for Content Marketing in long-form video format to the Hillsborough County Communications and Digital Media Department, specifically Hillsborough Television (HTV). The award recognized the YouTube series "Hillsborough County Animal Control: Unleashed," which follows day-to-day investigations, abuse cases, and reunifications. The first episode premiered in January 2026, and new episodes are released quarterly. The production uses patrol cameras, GoPro, and body cams. Digital media producer Kristen Lampy and Animal Control Supervisor Michael San Juan accepted. Lampy thanked his family, the communications team, and the animal control officers. San Juan stated, "We are not hiding what we're out there doing... showing the difference of the old dog catcher and what we're actually out there doing now." Environmental Scientist Recognition - Commissioner Bowles recognized Anthony Halcyon, a senior environmental scientist with Hillsborough County Environmental Services, for being inducted into the University of Florida's 40 Gators Under 40 class of 2026. Halcyon leads initiatives in water conservation, environmental education, public outreach, and regional coordination. His work includes translating complex environmental science into practical information for residents. Director Kevin Moran introduced him, noting that Halcyon's demeanor allows him to connect with customers and provide solutions. Halcyon thanked the commissioners and the county for allowing him to be a better person and scientist. Closing - A commissioner (likely Commissioner Bowles or another) concluded the ceremony, expressing gratitude to all award recipients for their invaluable work to make Hillsborough County a great place to live, work, and play.

The Zoning Hearing Master (ZHM) convened on August 24, 2026, at 6:00 PM at the County Center in Tampa to conduct public hearings on rezoning and major modification applications. Hearing Officer Steve Luce presided. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and staff introductions. All testimony was given under oath. The ZHM will file recommendations by September 15, 2026, with final decisions by the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) on October 13, 2026, for most items, unless otherwise noted. Consent Calendar - Withdrawn Applications (by Zoning Administrator): MM 26-0154 (Todd Pressman), RZ-PD 26-0206 (Karla Llanos), RZ-STD 26-0979 (Todd Pressman) - Continued to September 28, 2026, ZHM Hearing: MM 26-0215 (Florida Conference of Seventh-day Adventists), RZ-PD 26-0237 (Disbrow Corp & Mini Vacations), RZ-PD 26-0281 (Equity Trust Company), RZ-PD 26-0283 (Todd Pressman), MM 26-0546 (Crown Castle USA), RZ-PD 26-0665 (Greentek Property Solutions), RZ-PD 26-0706 (Samia Asset Management), MM 26-0735 (Hillary Hass / American Landmark), RZ-PD 26-0799 (Jacob Cremer), RZ-PD 26-0801 & 26-0802 (Learning Gate Community School), RZ-PD 26-0957 (Ray Gustafson), MM 26-0970 (Jacob Cremer, continued by applicant), RZ-STD 26-1158 (Manish Patel) Public Comments & Testimony Significant public testimony was heard on several applications: - MM 26-0062 (Apollo Beach): Multiple residents opposed the major modification to allow 237 multi-family units. Brad Algren (208 Apollo Beach Blvd) argued the conversion exceeded comprehensive plan density and was inconsistent with height and setback provisions. Laura Craig (6348 Coco Lane) cited severe traffic congestion on Apollo Beach Boulevard, school overcrowding, flooding risks, and evacuation concerns. Lynn Banks (102 St. George Court) presented a petition with 350 signatures from the Caribbean Isles community opposing the development, raising concerns about water runoff, canal siltation, traffic safety, and the building height exceeding the 50-foot guideline. Mary Laverley (123 St. Martin’s Way) questioned the DRI trip exchange methodology (35,000 sq ft vs. 310,000 sq ft) and drainage impacts. Michelle Reed (423 Island Cay Way) supported yielding time to Mr. Algren. Mario Vitoni (220 Elks Bay Rd), representing a neighboring industrial property, expressed concern about impact on remaining developable square footage. Robert Dobby (1407 Jumana Loop) raised concerns about crime and property values. Greg Ellett (6510 Dolphin Cove Dr) noted the traffic signal at Apollo Beach Blvd and US 41 is substandard and that a low-income apartment building was already approved nearby. - RZ-PD 26-0671 (Balm Rd LLC): Al Bruner (150 Carlton Lake Rd), president of the Balm Civic Association, opposed the 220-unit single-family development, arguing it violates the Balm Community Plan (1 unit per 5 acres), overloads schools, increases traffic on two-lane roads, lacks first responder infrastructure, and reduces agricultural capacity. He cited Sumner High School exceeding capacity within two years of opening. - RZ-PD 26-0673 (Corporation to Develop Communities of Tampa): Patricia Blandon (6502 23rd Ave) opposed the 20 affordable duplexes, citing destruction of old-growth trees, environmental concerns (natural springs filled, sinkhole risk, well water contamination), and the area already having multiple recycling plants. She expressed frustration with development not being responsive to the community. - MM 26-0800 (Perfection Partners / Thonotosassa): Lori Walker (13016 Country View Rd) opposed the 30-unit major modification, stating the rural roads cannot handle more traffic and that the planning commission previously recommended denial. Robert Alvis (11907 Thonotosassa Rd) argued the density (1.2 units/acre) does not fit the rural area, noting the road is the oldest paved road in unincorporated Hillsborough and is substandard. Sue Zaley (6411 Red Hawk Ln) and Tegan Zaley (6411 Red Hawk Ln) opposed, citing incompatibility with the rural scenic corridor, flooding impacts from previous developments, and failure to maintain rural character. - RZ-PD 26-0974 (Leaders Companies / Bellamy Rd): Jonathan Bailey (13790 Roosevelt Blvd), attorney for Hillsdale Baptist Church and school, strongly opposed the convenience store with gas pumps, citing safety risks for children, increased traffic (from 28 to 2,800 daily trips), environmental concerns (wetland impacts, fuel tanks near wetlands), and incompatibility with the residential and institutional character. Michael Cruz Markey (6535 Steeplechase Dr) noted a similar proposal was denied 17 years ago by the same hearing officer, and argued Bellamy Road is the only access for 2,500 homes and traffic would be dangerous. Richard Alexander (6516 Spring Oak Ct) described the development as “greed vs. families,” highlighting the church, pre-K, and schools nearby. Penelope Jacobs (6303 Neston Ct) worried about children exposed to alcohol and gambling. Ginger Wilson (15105 Craggy Cliff St) recounted witnessing a cyclist killed at the intersection and cited numerous daily collisions. Claudia Capiello (14919 Barbie Ave) presented a petition of 870 signatures opposing the project. Jennifer Anderson (14725 Red Cliff Dr) noted the rural area has farm animals and wildlife, and traffic from Veterans Expressway already causes backups. John Perricini (14720 Bellamy Rd) warned that wetland modifications would flood his property. - RZ-PD 26-0803 (22nd Avenue Tampa): No public opposition was recorded. - MM 26-0822 (Todd Pressman / Brandon): No public opposition was recorded. Discussion Items - C1. RZ-STD 26-1168 (Larry Poliner / RCE Consultants): Request to remove a restriction prohibiting sales/rental of farm and garden equipment on 0.45 acres zoned CG-R. Staff and planning commission found the removal supportable, consistent with surrounding commercial uses. No public opposition. - C2. RZ-STD 26-1184 (Mattamy Tampa/Sarasota): Rezone 16.51 acres from AS-1 to RSC-9 with restrictions (4 units/acre, 7,200 sq ft minimum lots, 60 ft width). Staff and planning commission found it compatible with surrounding residential. Public concerns about enforcement of plans, access on Raulerson Road, fence height, pump station noise, drainage, and notices. - D1. MM 26-0062 (Apollo Beach): Major modification to PD 77-0123 to convert 34,511 sq ft of commercial entitlements to 237 multi-family units. Dispute centered on trip exchange methodology: applicant argued PM peak hour trips (as per DRI), staff argued AM outbound peak hour trips control, requiring exchange of 310,364 sq ft. Applicant filed a concurrent DRI development order amendment. Staff recommended disapproval due to traffic tie; transportation staff confirmed exchange would exceed trip cap by 10 trips if using AM outbound. Planning commission found it consistent subject to DRI compliance. Height and buffer variations were requested; staff found variations supportable. - D2. RZ-PD 26-0363 (Todd Pressman): Rezone 4.11 acres from PD (18-1373) to new PD for 14 single-family homes (density 3.4 units/acre). Staff and planning commission found it compatible. No opposition. - D3. RZ-PD 26-0445 (Todd Pressman): Rezone 0.55 acres from CG to PD for a 4-story medical/professional office building (11,979 sq ft) at 4020 W Waters Ave. Significant downzoning from commercial general uses. PD variations for setbacks and buffers. One stormwater concern letter received. Staff and planning commission found it compatible and consistent. - D4. RZ-PD 26-0671 (Balm Rd LLC): Rezone 79.9 acres from AR and PD 93-0005 to new PD for 220 single-family detached units (density 2.75 units/acre). Staff and planning commission found it compatible. Public opposition cited density, traffic, school capacity, and infrastructure deficits. - D5. RZ-PD 26-0673 (Corporation to Develop Communities of Tampa): Rezone 1.71 acres from RSC-9 to PD for 20 affordable duplex units (12 units/acre). Staff and planning commission found it consistent with community plan. Public opposition raised tree removal, environmental damage, well contamination, and impact on neighborhood character. - D6. MM 26-0800 (Perfection Partners): Major modification to increase from 14 to 30 single-family lots on 24.22 acres (density 1.24 units/acre) in rural area, pending comprehensive plan amendment to R-2. Staff (development services) found it supportable; planning commission staff found inconsistent with rural character and policy 4.4.7 (lake frontage density). Applicant noted previous planning commission denial, but argued R-2 allows 2 units/acre. Public opposition emphasized incompatibility with rural scenic corridor, flooding, and infrastructure. - D7. RZ-PD 26-0803 (22nd Avenue Tampa): Rezone 22.2 acres (combination of PD and SPI-UC-2) near University Mall, with concurrent comp plan amendment to R-35 on a portion. Applicant seeks to allow multifamily (up to 483 units) in existing senior building and future redevelopment. Parcel B (ALF) unchanged. Staff and planning commission found it consistent. No opposition. - D8. MM 26-0822 (Todd Pressman): Major modification on 1.78 acres in Brandon to replace 18 duplexes with 16 townhomes (density 9 units/acre). Staff and planning commission found it compatible with enhanced buffers. No opposition. - D9. RZ-PD 26-0974 (Leaders Companies): Rezone 3.4 acres from AS-1 to PD for convenience store with 12 fueling pumps. Staff found not supportable due to wetland encroachment, intensity, and unresolved transportation issues (access spacing, right-of-way, county property use). Transportation staff recommended denial. Planning commission found inconsistent due to environmental and compatibility concerns. Applicant argued it meets commercial locational criteria and is a PD that can be conditioned. Public opposition overwhelming, citing safety, traffic, wetlands, and proximity to church/school. Key Outcomes - All applications in categories C and D were heard and are pending recommendation to the BOCC or the October 8, 2026 CPA meeting. The ZHM will file recommendations by September 15, 2026. - No final decisions were made at this hearing; all will be referred to the BOCC for final action. - Withdrawals and continuances as listed in the consent calendar were effectuated without hearing. - For D1, the ZHM noted the trip exchange dispute and allowed a five-minute extension for rebuttal. No motion was made; the record will include the applicant’s DRI amendment request. - For D6, the ZHM acknowledged the pending comprehensive plan amendment and the inconsistent planning commission finding. - For D9, the ZHM heard extensive opposition and noted the outstanding wetland variance and transportation issues; the applicant requested conditional approval. - Adjournment at approximately 8:50 PM after a 10-minute break.

The Circuit 13 Juvenile Justice Advisory Board convened on August 21, 2026, to discuss the closure of the Hillsborough Detention Center, crime statistics, community programs, and public concerns. Key actions included forming an emergency Detention Closure Work Group and receiving updates on workforce development and the Safe Summer Series. Consent Calendar - Agenda adopted by motion. - Minutes from February and May 2026 approved. - Major Craig Roberts confirmed as chair of the Service Excellence Award Subcommittee. Public Comments & Testimony - Reverend Dr. Thurston Smith: Expressed concern over the detention center closure, describing it as "poor policy and very poor planning." Emphasized the need for "warm handoffs" in transitions. - Connie Burton: Criticized the lack of transparency and questioned the racial demographics of affected youth. Stressed the need for community resources like bowling alleys and skating rinks. - Yvette Lewis (NAACP Hillsborough County): Requested full transparency and written answers regarding the detention closure. Called for NAACP representation on the board. - Valerie Bullock (Ponce Leon and College Hill Project): Highlighted the trauma of separation from families and the lack of planning. Emphasized the need for creative solutions and community funding. Discussion Items - Detention Center Closure Update: DJJ representative Ryan reported that the Hillsborough Detention Center is closing as part of a long-planned transition to a new facility. Youth are being moved to existing centers in surrounding counties, including Brevard and Manatee. Three youth have been moved so far. Members expressed concerns about transportation, family visitation, attorney access, mental health impact, and lack of communication. A motion to form an emergency Detention Closure Work Group was made, seconded, and approved. Rob Parkinson volunteered to chair the group. - Delinquency Citation Statistics (Judy Royston): For June 2026, 42 total citations (38 community, 4 school); dominant charge was battery DV (12). For July 2026, 34 community, zero school; dominant charges were DV and petty theft (9 each). Gender breakdown: 18 females and 25 males in June; 20 females and 14 males in July. - Children's Services Update: Reported July 2026 bed days: 161 SINS (shelter/independent living), 124 DV (domestic violence). Current facility population: 1 truancy, 4 SINS, 1 DV, 1 DCF. - Innovation Zone Subcommittee (Conchita Jones): Presented the "Future Forward Pathways to Employment" pilot program targeting 25 youth ages 16–18 on probation. Focus on workforce readiness, credentials, and job placement. Subcommittee to continue exploring partners and funding. - Safe Summer Series (Freddie Barton): Reported over 800 youth participated in four positive takeover events with zero arrests. Nine youth completed the Responsibility Matters restorative justice program, resulting in no-file status for charges related to a street takeover. The Evening Reporting Center will continue beyond September 30 despite loss of state funding, sustained by Hillsborough County funds ($300,000 for ERC and gun violence initiative). Mentioned community violence prevention mini-grants of up to $2,500 each. Key Outcomes - Motion for an emergency Detention Closure Work Group passed unanimously. The work group will meet weekly (possibly via Teams) to identify problems, propose stopgap solutions (e.g., using other county facilities), and issue recommendations to DJJ. - Reduction in detention bed days: From 20,789 in state fiscal year 2024-25 to 19,472 in 2025-26, a reduction of 1,317 bed days, attributed to collaborative work despite legislation holding youth longer. - The board committed to seeking community input and continuing collaboration with DJJ and local stakeholders.

The Tampa Bay Water Board held its regular meeting on August 19, 2026, addressing drought conditions, water supply projects, and infrastructure expansions. The board approved several action items related to the South Hillsborough Pipeline and Well Field, SCADA upgrades, and professional services contracts. Public comments included concerns about low lake levels and a rambling statement on constitutional issues. Public Comments & Testimony - David Ballard Geddes Jr. delivered a rambling statement referencing the Federalist Papers, the Constitution, and other topics, none directly related to water issues. - Joe Abuzek, representing Lake Carroll residents (approximately 1,000 people), reported that the lake is at a record low, causing boating and fishing to cease and leaving about 50 boats stranded on lifts. He thanked staff for coordinating on the issue and requested continued help from Tampa Bay Water. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda was approved unanimously without any items pulled. General Manager’s Report - Drought conditions persist across the tri-county area, with most of the region in extreme or severe drought. A rainfall deficit of 14.3 inches over the last year and river flows at 23.3 million gallons per day (MGD) below normal remain critical. The service area remains under Stage 3 water shortage restrictions through at least October 1. - The C.W. Bill Young Reservoir is now at 4 billion gallons (26% full), up from previous lows. Conservation and enforcement are yielding results: July deliveries were 10 MGD less than projected. - The 12-month average pumping rate for consolidated permit well fields reached 106.3 MGD at July’s end. The South Central Hillsborough Regional Well Field averaged 26.57 MGD, below its permit limit. - In July, the agency successfully priced $292 million in revenue bonds for the capital improvement plan, refunding a portion of 2016 bonds. The bonds were oversubscribed six times, with orders exceeding $2.3 billion, allowing for lower interest rates. Bond closing is scheduled for August 27. - Other updates: a new point of connection request from Pasco County (target 2035), participation in cybersecurity workshops, and receipt of the GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the 18th consecutive year. Discussion and Action Items South Hillsborough Pipeline – Final GMP Package (C1) - The board approved the fourth and final Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) amendment with Garney Companies Inc. for $53.65 million ($38.8 million funded by Tampa Bay Water, $14.8 million by Hillsborough County). The total project budget increased to $534.4 million from $505.7 million, largely due to additional work requested by Hillsborough County and higher property acquisition costs. South Hillsborough Pipeline – Program Management Support (C2) - Approved a $3.76 million amendment to the Black & Veatch contract for continued program and construction management support, bringing the total contract to $7 million. Motion passed unanimously. Fish Hawk CDD Easement Settlement (C3) - Approved a $2.1 million settlement with the Fish Hawk Community Development District for seven permanent and two temporary easements. Property acquisition for Segment B increased from $9 million budget to an estimated $11.4 million, but the overall pipeline property budget of $23 million is expected to have savings. South Hillsborough Well Field – Engineering Services (C4) - Approved a $14.3 million professional engineering services contract with Stantec Consulting Services. The well field is expected to yield 6 to 12 MGD, with completion targeted for November 2029. The project has secured 3.7 MGD in water use permits from private landowners and may gain up to 6.1 MGD through recharge credits with Hillsborough County. SCADA System Upgrades at Surface Water Treatment Plant (C5) - Approved a $20.3 million contract amendment with Veolia for construction phase services. The project will modernize the SCADA system, including PLCs, data networks, and cybersecurity controls. Construction will run concurrent with the plant expansion, with substantial completion by December 2028. As-Needed Engineering Services Contracts (C6) - Approved the award of 25 five-year contracts for as-needed engineering services, each valued at up to $1.25 million, with individual tasks up to $500,000. Nine of the 25 firms are new to Tampa Bay Water. Construction Update – South Hillsborough Pipeline and Surface Water Treatment Plant Expansion (D1) - The surface water treatment plant expansion is 10% complete (20% of budget spent). The South Hillsborough Pipeline is 8% complete by linear footage (20% of construction budget spent). Staff highlighted public outreach efforts, including coordination with six schools. Commissioner Wastel expressed concerns about inadequate public notification and requested improved signage and communication. The update was received and filed unanimously. Key Outcomes - All action items (C1 through C6) were approved unanimously by the board. - The board received and filed the construction update (D1). - The board discussed possibly canceling the September meeting if the agenda is light. - A motion to adjourn was approved unanimously.

The Hillsborough County Tourism Development Council (TDC) met on August 13, 2026, at 3:30 PM to receive quarterly updates on tourism development tax (TDT) collections, consider a revised FY27 budget, and hear presentations on the Tampa Convention Center expansion study and Visit Tampa Bay’s performance. Key discussions centered on proposed reductions to Visit Tampa Bay’s funding amidst a challenging revenue outlook, with council members debating the appropriate balance between marketing, capital improvements, and reserve use. The council voted to accept the quarterly report and revised budget with a footnote allowing administrative reallocation of unspent funds to Visit Tampa Bay. One member dissented. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The minutes from the prior meeting were approved unanimously with a voice vote after a motion by Councilmember Gonsmart Williams and a second by Councilmember Palencia. Roll call was taken: Hagan, Castor, Collier, Gonsmart Williams, Haney, Mackinaw, Manthe, Morrison, Licentia, and Ross were present, establishing a quorum. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public offered comments. Discussion Items Tourism Development Tax (TDT) Quarterly Report and Revised FY27 Budget - Presentation: Yaxha (Administrative Officer) presented the TDT quarterly report for quarters two and three (Q2 and Q3) of FY26. Key points: - Three-cent TDT: $20.4 million in collections, $19.9 million in revenues, $15.6 million in expenditures, leaving a year-to-date balance of $182,000. - Six-cent TDT: $6.8 million in collections, $6.8 million in revenues, $3.4 million in expenditures, leaving $2.6 million year-to-date. - Collections were down 7.6% overall for FY26 compared to FY25, with Q1 down 17.2%, Q2 down 11%, and Q3 up 3.7%. July 2026 collections were up 0.78% compared to July 2025. - Projections for Q4: $6.8 million in collections but $10 million in expenditures, resulting in a $3 million shortfall for the quarter and a $2.9 million deficit for the year. - Revised FY27 budget: projecting 4% growth off FY26 expected numbers, with three-cent collections estimated at $35.5 million. Allocations include: - Visit Tampa Bay: $25.836 million (2.5% reduction from FY26) - Tampa Bay Sports Commission: $1.819 million (3% increase) - Tampa Bay Film Commission: $527,000 (3% increase) - High Impact Events: $750,000 (reduced from $1.3 million, with $550,000 reallocated to Visit Tampa Bay) - Film Incentive: increased by $500,000 for a new production ("Land Remembered") - TSA Operations: flat at $350,000 - Facility Enhancements: flat at $500,000 - Make It Tampa Bay: reduced by $850,000 to $150,000 (with $650,000 reallocated to Visit Tampa Bay) - Corporate Transient Demand Marketing: reduced by $200,000 - Visitor Experience: unchanged at $255,000 - Out-of-Area Marketing: unchanged at $985,000 - Six-cent allocations: Visit Tampa Bay $3.3 million (a $254,000 reduction), Cultural and Attraction-Based Capital reduced by $594,000, and Tampa Convention Center obligation unchanged at $2 million. - Council Discussion: - Councilmember Hagan expressed concern about the 2.5% reduction to Visit Tampa Bay (approximately $600,000), noting that the industry faces a tough year ahead and questioned whether the cut could be absorbed from reserves. He asked where the reduction would impact staffing or marketing. - Councilmember Placencia commended staff for walking a fine line and noted that the budget softened the blow compared to initial proposals. He highlighted the film incentive increase as a positive, calling the potential TV series "Land Remembered" a major opportunity. - Councilmember Morrison proposed restoring Visit Tampa Bay’s funding by reducing the Cultural and Attraction-Based Capital line item by the same amount (2.3%), arguing that the marketing fuel is critical. He also suggested looking at other categories like facility enhancements or corporate transient demand marketing for savings. He emphasized that the hotel industry supports keeping Visit Tampa Bay whole, and that the budget should reflect that priority. - Councilmember (Mayor) Castor noted that Visit Tampa Bay receives 43% of the total TDT budget (including flow-throughs like visitor experience centers, making it effectively 40-41% according to Santiago later). She argued that this is already a significant share and that capital investments are also necessary to maintain attractions. - Councilmember Manthe said his first priority is keeping Visit Tampa Bay whole, noting that competing cities typically allocate 50% of their TDT to their CVB. He suggested approving the budget with a footnote allowing the County Administrator to move unused funds from other line items (e.g., film incentives, cultural capital, high impact events) to Visit Tampa Bay on an administrative basis. - Greg Horwidell (Deputy County Administrator) explained that the reductions are a reflection of reality, not a judgment on Visit Tampa Bay’s performance. He stated that capital dollars are necessary to maintain first-rate facilities that attract visitors, and that the council can revisit allocations at the next quarterly meeting if revenues outperform. - Tom Fessler (Chief Financial Administrator) noted that TDT reserves are approximately $30 million, but there is a planned drawdown for the 2029 College Football Playoff National Championship and other projects. He said interest earnings on the three-cent TDT are expected to be about $1 million this year. - Councilmember Hagan expressed preference for using reserves rather than cutting any organization, especially in a challenging year. He supported the motion with the footnote. - Vote: A motion by Councilmember Manthe, seconded by Councilmember Collier, to accept the quarterly financial report and the revised budget recommendation with the administrative footnote (allowing reallocation of unspent funds to Visit Tampa Bay) was approved. The vote was 9-1, with Councilmember Morrison recorded as a no vote. Tampa Convention Center Expansion Feasibility Study - Presentation: David Ingram, Executive Director of the Tampa Convention Center, presented findings from a study conducted by CSL (Convention Sports and Leisure). Key points: - Current facility: 200,000 square feet of exhibit space (bottom third of competitive set, average 290,000 sq ft), 36,000 sq ft ballroom (average 63,000 sq ft), and low ballroom-to-exhibit ratio. - Competitors are expanding: Austin (demolish and rebuild to 275,000 sq ft), Fort Lauderdale (expanded to 350,000 sq ft with 800-room Omni), Raleigh (expanding with 90,000 sq ft flexible space and 600-room Omni), and Nashville (moving toward expansion). - Occupancy at the center is at 65-70% (exhibit space) and exceeding 70% for ballroom, indicating the center is full and turning away business. In FY23-24, the center achieved 65% exhibit occupancy and over 70% ballroom occupancy. - Six targets for expansion: three critical – 150,000-200,000 sq ft additional exhibit space, 50,000-60,000 sq ft ballroom, and an 800+ room headquarters hotel. Supporting: 30,000-40,000 sq ft meeting space, outdoor capacity for 1,000, and more dining/retail within walking distance. - Four concepts presented: 1. Concept 1: Expand north of Embassy Suites, reconfigure front drive (remove stairs), add 140,000 sq ft exhibit, 58,000 sq ft ballroom, 24,000 sq ft meeting rooms. No new hotel. Tax impact: $12.6 million (currently $11.4 million). 2. Concept 2: Add a 200-300 room hotel on the Sails Plaza site. Tax impact: $13 million. 3. Concept 3: Use FDOT property (off-ramp) for a 600-800 room hotel. Tax impact: $14.5 million. 4. Concept 4: Full build-out with 150,000 sq ft exhibit, 800-1,000 room hotel on both FDOT and TIA property. Tax impact: $15.1 million. - If no expansion, tax revenue is projected to drop to $10.7 million as the center reaches capacity and large groups like SOF Week (27,000 attendees) may seek other venues. - Phased approach suggested: first build the exhibit space behind Embassy Suites, then renovate the existing facility, keeping the center operational during construction. - Council Discussion: - Councilmember (Lou) advocated for going big with Concept 4, cautioning against a phased approach that could disrupt business. He noted that in his experience, adding hotel rooms lifts all boats. - Councilmember (Mayor) Castor noted that four hotel brands are interested, and the property is available. - Councilmember (Bob) thanked Ingram for the valuable discussion and noted the need to plan for future revenue generation. - Councilmember (Troy) supported Concept 4, saying "go bigger, go home." Visit Tampa Bay Performance Report - Presentation: Santiago, President and CEO of Visit Tampa Bay, provided a performance update. - He thanked the council for their concerns about funding and acknowledged the collaboration with county staff. - Clarified that the 43% figure includes flow-throughs (e.g., visitor experience centers, Make It Tampa Bay) that Visit Tampa Bay manages without taking an admin cut, so the effective allocation is 40-41%. - Performance data (Smith Travel Research, October 2025 – June 2026): - Occupancy: 73% (down from hurricane-inflated 77% in FY25, but on par with normal record years). - Average Daily Rate (ADR) and Revenue Per Available Room (RevPAR) outperformed FY25 and FY24. - July 2026 hotel performance was up over 2% compared to July 2025; first week of August 2026 was up 2.9%. - Bed tax collections through May 2026: $54.6 million. - Economic impact: major conventions and events hosted, including all four major government groups (U.S. Conference of Mayors, National League of Cities, National Association of Counties, county administrators). - Competitive concerns: Tampa has the smallest convention center in its comp set, and other markets like Savannah are expanding. Without expansion, the center will lose business. - Marketing campaigns generated $48 million in hotel revenue (tracked via ad clicks and bookings). - Free media: $22 million in earned media, averaging 4 stories per day. - Corporate transient program generated 92,000+ room nights and $19 million in hotel revenue. - Santiago stated that the organization will make the budget work, but noted that contractual commitments (rent, utilities, incentives) and staff are the primary uses of funds, with marketing and programming being flexible. Key Outcomes - Budget Approval: The council voted 9-1 to accept the quarterly TDT financial report and the revised FY27 budget, including a footnote allowing the County Administrator to reallocate unspent funds from other line items to Visit Tampa Bay. Councilmember Morrison was the sole dissenter, advocating for a different allocation. - Next Steps: Staff will bring back a report at the next quarterly meeting to revisit allocations if revenues improve. The convention center expansion study will be further considered; no formal action was taken. - Convention Center: The council acknowledged the need for expansion and directed staff to continue exploring options. No vote was taken.

The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) held a public hearing on August 13, 2026, to consider multiple comprehensive plan amendments and rezonings, including both small-scale and large-scale map amendments, urban service area expansions, and concurrent rezoning requests. The meeting featured extensive public testimony on several items, particularly the Dorman Road/Lithia Pinecrest proposals (Items C1, C2, and C3). The board approved all items except where noted, with the most contested decisions passing by a 5-2 vote. Consent Calendar & Early Items - Item A1 (HCCPA 2607) & Rezoning PD 26-0433: Approved 7-0. A small-scale map amendment (6.7 acres) from Res-6/OC-20 to Light Industrial Plan (LIP), with a concurrent planned development rezoning for warehouse/distribution/manufacturing (up to 100,000 sq ft). The site is near Tampa International Airport and in a coastal high-hazard area. Applicant argued res-6 is inappropriate; planning commission found consistency. No public speakers. - Item A3 (HCCPA 2613): Approved 7-0. Small-scale map amendment (1.12 acres) from Res-1 to Res-2 at 2909 Dur Road, allowing increased density (1 to 2 units per acre). Applicant Lindy Long sought to split property for a second dwelling. No public opposition. - Item A4 (HCCPA 2614): Approved 7-0. Small-scale map amendment (9.57 acres) at 15640 Carton Lake Road from Ag-Rural 1:5 to Ag-Estate 1:2.5, allowing higher density. Applicant Josephine Lauder explained the need to subdivide for family home. No public opposition. Transmittal Items (B1 and B2) - Items B1 (HCCPA 2602) & B2 (HCCPA 2603): Approved 6-0 for transmittal to the state. Large-scale amendments (81.9 acres) to expand the urban service area and change future land use from Res-1 to Res-2 and Res-4 at Williams Road and Bessie Dix Road. Planning commission found consistency. Applicant noted no opposition letters received. Traffic and emergency management comments were raised but not considered formal objections. Contested Items: Dorman Road Proposals (C1, C2, C3) Public Comments & Testimony Over 70 individuals signed up to speak; the board set a 2-minute limit per speaker. The vast majority of public comment opposed the Dorman Road proposals (Items C1, C2, and the rezoning). Key themes included: - Traffic & Infrastructure: Many residents cited that Lithia Pinecrest Road has failed level of service for nearly two decades, with no scheduled widening. Commissioner Wastel acknowledged the road is "the worst road in the county" and noted a $100 million commitment for widening, but residents argued that alone is insufficient. - Emergency Services: Multiple speakers (including a former critical care nurse, a retired firefighter, and a resident) detailed slow response times, with Fire Station 2 being 1.5 miles away but response times already failing. The county's Office of Emergency Management found the application conflicted with the local mitigation strategy. - School Overcrowding: Residents testified that Newsom High School is at 3,000+ students (capacity 2,500), and buses are overcrowded with children sitting on floors. - Environmental & Wildlife Concerns: Speakers highlighted the presence of Florida sandhill cranes, gopher tortoises (reclassified as critically endangered), Florida panthers, and other wildlife. The site is part of the Florida Ecological Greenways Network. The agribusiness department warned of impacts on agricultural transport. - Rural Character & Compatibility: Speakers argued that the proposed density (up to 2 units per acre) is a tenfold increase from the existing 1 unit per 5 acres, violating the comprehensive plan's requirement for gradual transition. Many residents stated they moved to Lithia for the rural lifestyle. - Stormwater & Flooding: Residents showed photos of flooding from previous developments and cited that the site is in a FEMA high-risk flood zone and a peak-sensitive basin. - Legal & Procedural: Opponents noted that the planning commission voted 4-3 to find the amendments inconsistent, and that the applicant's site plan changed late in the process, potentially violating due process. Proponent testimony (from the applicant and the seller of the land) argued that the proposal meets all seven criteria for urban service area expansion, provides a moderate density (1.47 units per acre, reduced from 380 to 280 units), and includes enhanced buffers and landscaping. The applicant also noted that a denial would not preserve the land but could open it to more intensive uses by right, such as a school or industrial uses. Discussion Items - Commissioner Miller (District representative) stated she would not support the amendments, citing school capacity, fire response, and traffic issues. She thanked the community for their engagement. - Commissioner Wastel raised concerns about the roundabout design and mobility fees. He noted that the board had recently approved a YIGBY (Yes In God's Backyard) pilot that could allow dense multifamily on the site, and that the proposed development, though not ideal, provides more control than a state preemption. He indicated he could support with conditions on mobility fees and roundabout design. - Commissioner Cohen asked detailed questions about the site plan, buffers, and access points. She noted the $100 million for Lithia Pinecrest widening and the $1.8 billion One Water investment. - Commissioner Myers moved to approve the comprehensive plan amendments, citing that all staff recommendations were for consistency and that the proposal meets housing needs. - Commissioner Bowles emphasized the community's role in shaping the development, noting the developer made meaningful concessions. He also cited the threat of state preemption (Live Local Act) that could force higher density with less local control. Key Outcomes - HCCPA 2605 (Urban Service Area Expansion): Approved 5-2 (Commissioners Miller and Cameta opposed). Requires a supermajority. - HCCPA 2606 (Future Land Use to Res-2): Approved 5-2 (same opposition). - Rezoning PD 26-0422 (280-unit planned development): Approved 5-2 with two amendments: (1) removal of the emergency access on Dorman Road, and (2) a condition requiring mobility fees from the development to be used for transportation improvements in the immediate area (consistent with recent approvals). The motion also included a discussion to ensure the roundabout design does not preclude future widening. Commissioners Miller and Cameta voted no. The board adjourned after the vote.

The Hillsborough Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Board held its regular meeting on Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. at the Hillsborough County Center. Chair Andrew Ross presided; Vice Chair Joshua Wostal took over after 11:00 a.m. The board approved the minutes from the June 10, 2026, meetings, adopted a new procurement policy with a reporting requirement, accepted an economic benefits of trails report, and received several status updates. Public comment highlighted concerns about pedestrian safety, transit service cuts, and the need for regional vision. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The board unanimously approved the minutes from the June 10, 2026, TPO Board meeting and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Public Hearing. Public Comments & Testimony - Hong Mai (new member of the Florida Transportation Commission) introduced himself, outlined his experience with the Southwest Florida Water Management District and Tampa Port Authority, and requested a five-minute slot at a future meeting to appear in person. - Christina Clark (via Facebook) expressed frustration with Tampa’s ranking as one of the deadliest metros for pedestrians and urged stronger Vision Zero enforcement, including protecting bike lanes and enforcing the three-foot passing rule. - Sarasota Mobility Alliance (via Facebook) asked that buses run as late as local bars are open. - Ran Bear Robbins (via email) urged the TPO and partner agencies to restore emergency funding for the Transportation Disadvantaged Tampa Bay cross-county service, citing negative impacts on workforce participation and independence for people with disabilities. - Kayam Shakat (via email) recommended dedicated light rail/tram corridors, traffic calming, protected bike infrastructure, and transit-oriented development to reduce car dependency in Pasco and Hillsborough counties. Committee Reports - Rick Fernandez, CAC Chair: Reported that the Citizens Advisory Committee (August 5, 2026) discussed HART’s Transit Development Plan and the Little Manatee South Urban Expansion Area Study. He highlighted concerns from the Sundance community that environmental and hurricane evacuation data were omitted from the study analysis, and requested the TPO encourage FDOT to broaden the scope to include Buckeye Road in Manatee County. - Harmoni McGee, TPO Staff: Summarized the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee’s recommendation to accept the Economic Benefits of Trails report, noting the committee’s interest in tracking tourism dollars from trails. She also read the public comments received via social media and email (listed above). Action Items - TPO Procurement Policy: Presented by Jonathan Nixon Elder. The policy establishes a procurement framework for professional services, with contracts valued at $200,000 or more requiring TPO Board approval. After discussion, Commissioner Chris Boles moved to approve the policy with a condition that the Executive Director provide a quarterly report for purchases between $50,000 and $200,000 for one year. The motion was seconded by School Board Member Lynn Gray and passed unanimously. - Economic Benefits of Trails Report: Presented by Jenna Gordon. The report, prepared with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, found that the existing 48-mile multiuse trail network supports 79 jobs annually, generates $3.36 million in wages, $9.9 million in annual visitor spending, and up to $8.5 million in annual household transportation savings (if 5% of county residents shift to a 3-mile round trip per week). A hypothetical 25-mile expansion could support 171 jobs and $21 million in annual output. Commissioner Joshua Wostal moved to receive the report; board member John King seconded. The motion passed unanimously after discussion emphasizing connectivity over paving and safety concerns. Status Reports - HART Route 1 Update: Jesus Peraza Garcia reported on the 2025 fare-free pilot (42–57% ridership increase) and the 2026 frequency-increase pilot (weekend ridership up 7–10% vs. 2024). Although fares were restored, Route 1 outperformed the system (weekday decline 8% vs. 12% systemwide). A survey found 27% of riders were new and 80% would continue riding with fares. Next survey planned for December 2026. - 2027–2036 Transit Development Plan (TDP) Major Update: Heather Sovush presented outreach results from March 2026: 800 survey responses and 10 workshops with 59 attendees. Top desired connections included airport-to-downtown and East Tampa-to-West Tampa; top improvements included frequency increases and bus rapid transit. The final plan will be presented to HART Board in November 2026 and to the TPO in January 2027. - Regional Infrastructure Accelerator (RIA) Update: Gina Dew (HNTB) provided an update on the RIA grant. Five shortlisted regional projects (Westshore Intermodal Center, TPA-to-downtown premium transit, I-275 managed lanes, US 19 BRT, and Tampa streetcar extension) are being evaluated for financing using Build America Bureau tools. A second round of funding ($1 million) was awarded to advance analysis. The report will be submitted to USDOT in September 2026. Councilmember Naya Young expressed support for the streetcar extension; Commissioner Boles questioned the Hillsborough-heavy list; Director Wong asked about private investment opportunities. Executive Director’s Report - Dr. Johnny Wong announced a TPO Special Meeting on September 1, 2026 (Tuesday) to review Phase 2 merger deliverables, and a regular meeting on September 9. A Tri-County TMA meeting is set for October 2. He noted federal legislative updates: a proposed rulemaking to convert grant management guidance into regulations (20 states challenging) and local staff will attend the Tri-County BOCC meeting on August 15 to discuss the 2027 legislative program. He clarified that the Fort Hamer Interchange project is not a TPO action item and remains in the unfunded needs plan. Key Outcomes - Unanimous approval of June 10, 2026, meeting minutes. - Unanimous approval of the TPO Procurement Policy with a one-year reporting condition for purchases between $50k and $200k. - Unanimous acceptance of the Economic Benefits of Trails report. - Reports received by unanimous vote: HART Route 1 update, TDP Major Update, and RIA update (all for information only). - Next meetings: Special TPO Board Meeting – September 1, 2026; Regular TPO Board Meeting – September 9, 2026; Tri-County TMA – October 2, 2026.