Tue, Feb 24, 2026·Alameda, California·City Council

City of Alameda–AC Transit ILC Meeting Summary (February 24, 2026)

Discussion Breakdown

Engineering And Infrastructure52%
Equity in Transportation14%
Disability Rights10%
Procedural9%
Workforce Development5%
Public Engagement5%
Transportation Safety3%
Community Engagement1%
Fiscal Sustainability1%

Summary

City of Alameda–AC Transit ILC Meeting (February 24, 2026)

The City of Alameda and AC Transit Interagency Liaison Committee (ILC) held a hybrid meeting focused on coordination updates: (1) ILC restructuring parameters, (2) Alameda construction projects and anticipated transit impacts, (3) recent AC Transit service changes and school supplementary service planning, (4) the Park Street Transit Signal Priority (TSP) and signal optimization project, and (5) program/status updates including the free bus pass pilot, the Alameda TMA EasyPass program, the Oakland-Alameda Access Project tube closures, and post-Realign ridership/complaints.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Christina (Community Action for Sustainable Alameda) expressed excitement and support for the corridor and signal projects and praised City–AC Transit coordination. She urged expanded, street-level communications beyond email lists (noting many riders may not be subscribed), suggested including Oakland-Alameda Access Project website information in stop postings, and recommended posting construction/transit materials at Alameda libraries.

Discussion Items

  • ILC restructuring update (AC Transit)

    • Robert Del Rosario (AC Transit) reported Board-approved parameters: Alameda will remain a standalone (not joint) ILC meeting in response to feedback; meetings reduced to 3 times/year (from 4); target 90-minute meeting length; remote participation options still being explored though meetings remain in-person for now.
  • Ongoing City of Alameda construction projects (City Public Works)

    • Brendan Christelier (City of Alameda) reviewed active and upcoming projects and expected AC Transit impacts:
      • Central Avenue project (1.7 miles): intersection near Pacific/Main/Central closed and routes already rerouted; project still expected to finish ahead of the original August 2026 end date (now projected late spring/early summer, weather depending).
      • Sanitary sewer replacement: coordinated to avoid lane closures that would prevent traffic flow; flaggers planned.
      • Shoreline outfalls (Crown Beach area): work off-roadway; no expected transit impacts.
      • Clement/Tilden/Fernside/Landing closures: identified as the most impactful; staged closures including Fernside closure expected late March–June; Landing closure expected mid-September–November; bus stop reconstruction September–November with potential temporary reopening depending on construction.
      • Lincoln Park pathway lighting and annual painting/striping: minimal to no expected transit impacts.
      • Upcoming temporary bus stop upgrades on Willie Stargell: bids expected in the next 1–2 months; construction anticipated ~2–3 months thereafter.
    • Vice Mayor Marilyn Pryor asked about updating navigation apps; staff stated the City can notify Waze/Google/Apple via established channels.
  • February 2026 AC Transit service change (Alameda highlights)

    • AC Transit staff summarized changes implemented Feb. 1 to improve reliability and respond to crowding/operator feedback:
      • Line 19 now terminates at Fruitvale BART (instead of Division 4).
      • Minor schedule adjustments on Lines 30, 31, and 96.
      • Line O: added one morning weekday trip to San Francisco and one afternoon weekday trip to Fruitvale BART to address reported overcrowding.
    • Vice Mayor Pryor asked how added trips were accommodated after Realign; Del Rosario attributed capacity to improved operator availability/attendance and improved “service operated,” noting AC Transit’s goal is 99.5% and recent performance was regularly above 98%.
    • Vice Mayor Pryor raised a rider experience issue: some W and O trips appear to arrive at Santa Clara/Webster at nearly the same time; AC Transit agreed to review whether this is schedule design, late running, and/or whether ridership supports intentional “platooning” versus staggering.
  • Supplementary school service update (AC Transit)

    • Sean Dislajone (AC Transit) explained supplementary service as added school-day capacity aligned to bell times (generally drop-off 15–20 minutes before school; pick-up 5–15 minutes after).
    • AC Transit will request updated bell schedules (letters/emails going out in the next week or two; requested return by the first Friday of March).
    • Alameda supplementary service: 9 trips/day. A slide table had an error due to double-counting; staff clarified ridership is about 300 riders/day (not ~500+), or roughly 30–35 passengers per trip.
    • Coordinated bell-time schools identified: Alameda High School, Island High School, Encinal Junior/Senior High, Lincoln Middle School; other schools along routes may use service but may not be coordinated.
    • Susan Davis (Alameda USD community affairs) asked if AC Transit has trouble receiving bell schedules; staff said Alameda coordination has been strong. Davis offered to help facilitate school contacts if needed.
    • Vice Mayor Pryor thanked AC Transit and Alameda USD (including Board President Ryan Lalonde) for coordination around Otis-area school needs during an upcoming temporary campus move.
  • Park Street TSP & Signal Optimization Project (AC Transit / consultant team)

    • Maria Henderson (AC Transit), Will Bueller (AC Transit traffic engineer), and Ryan Dole (Kimley-Horn) presented the MTC Bus Accelerated Infrastructure Delivery (BusAID)-funded project.
    • Scope: extend Park St. TSP from existing coverage (Blanding to Central) to Otis; extend wireless interconnect Encinal to Otis; upgrade controller/wiring at Park & San Jose; conduct pre/post evaluation.
    • Construction expectations: half-day lane closures (lanes reopened daily), work hours 8:30 a.m.–3:00 p.m., possible temporary bus stop relocations/no-parking restrictions (~1 day), and pedestrian accessible detours as needed.
    • Construction duration: overall about 3 months, with ~1 month of active field work and additional time for programming and signal timing updates.
    • Benefits stated by staff: improved bus reliability/efficiency; reduced passenger delay; improved corridor signal coordination that can reduce congestion for all users; minimal impacts to other modes because green time is only used when available.
    • A prior TSP project study (Line 51 corridor/Webster) was cited as having decreased commute-direction travel times by an average of 28%.
    • Vice Mayor Pryor asked whether Park St. results might be similar; presenters said outcomes are uncertain due to corridor differences but they will evaluate quickly after completion (consultant estimated roughly ~3 months for evaluation work).
    • Vice Mayor Pryor also asked why bus priority is constrained by other movements; staff responded that policies vary and AC Transit’s approach reflects adopted policy balancing agencies/residents.
    • Staff described communications: stop notices, rider alerts, project website, and social media; Vice Mayor asked about easy access methods (e.g., QR codes) and multilingual information.

Status Briefings

  • Free bus pass pilot for seniors and people with disabilities (City of Alameda)

    • Liz Escobar (City paratransit coordinator) reported ~116,000 rides/taps from July–Dec 2025 (~19,300/month).
    • Current enrollment: 730 members, a 24% decrease from end of last fiscal year due to deactivations for non-renewal and adding ~30 from the waitlist.
    • Escobar emphasized the program’s importance, citing ongoing daily interest and a story of an 85-year-old who received a pass after nearly a year on the waitlist.
    • Waitlist update: ~35 people remain; Lisa Foster (City) noted a requested $7,000 per fiscal year budget adjustment to help cover per-ride rate increases and potentially clear the waitlist; staff described uncertainty because rides are unlimited and they are awaiting clearer post-deactivation usage data.
    • A councilmember referenced potential future ACTC discretionary funding and encouraged tracking regional opportunities for fare programs.
  • Transportation Management Association (TMA) update (Alameda TMA)

    • Michael Hara (TMA president/chair) introduced Arsh Singh Hothi (new general manager).
    • EasyPass program growth: from 2,572 passes (April 2025) to 2,886 at the most recent count (+314), attributed in part to new housing (COOs) and employer growth at Alameda Point.
    • Singh Hothi conveyed partner feedback (APC/Building Futures) that EasyPass is a “lifeline” for residents, helping access essentials (e.g., groceries, healthcare) via lines including 19 and 96.
  • Oakland-Alameda Access Project (tube closures) coordination

    • Lisa Foster (City) expressed appreciation to ACTC/Caltrans for shifting Webster Tube work from continuous single-lane closure to overnight closures, and for shortening closure end time from 6 a.m. to 5 a.m. to reduce impacts on AC Transit morning operations.
    • AC Transit staff stated they are developing potential detour schedules for a possible April service change, using standard tube-closure detours (e.g., Park St. Bridge routing), and noted complexities with different Sunday/weekday schedules. Closures described as Sunday nights through Thursday nights (into Friday mornings), with no weekend closures.
  • AC Transit ridership and complaints (post-Realign; Sept–Dec 2025)

    • Crystal Wayne (AC Transit) reported:
      • Lines 20/21 (renumbered to 30/31): ridership roughly flat vs. Sept–Dec 2024.
      • Line 19: up about 14% on average.
      • Transbay Line W: up about 6% on average (staff attributed likely to elimination of Line OX).
      • Lines 51A, 96, and O: slightly down vs. the same period in 2024.
    • On-time performance challenges continue on some routes (AC Transit definition: no more than 1 minute early or 5 minutes late); staff expect some improvement following the February service change.
    • Complaint themes: late buses, canceled trips, and Line O overcrowding (which staff said was addressed with added trips).

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes or motions were recorded in the transcript.
  • Operational/coordination outcomes and next steps included:
    • Confirmation of ILC restructuring parameters (Alameda standalone meeting; 3 meetings/year; 90-minute target).
    • Continued City–AC Transit coordination on construction impacts, especially the Fernside/Landing closures and stop relocations.
    • AC Transit to review potential W/O trip timing at Santa Clara/Webster and assess ridership/scheduling for possible staggering.
    • AC Transit to proceed toward Park Street TSP project milestones: design completion targeted end of February, construction spring–summer 2026, fine-tuning end of summer 2026, and in-service TSP by fall 2026.
    • City to monitor free-pass pilot funding and ridership trends before clearing remaining waitlist.
    • AC Transit to continue planning detours/schedules for Webster Tube overnight closures, with potential adjustments in an April service change.

Next Meetings

  • June 11, 2026
  • October 8, 2026

Meeting Transcript

We can go ahead and uh start the meeting. Uh and I'll start with the uh the script to uh uh acknowledge that we're in our remote meeting. Good morning and welcome to the February 12, 2026 City of Alameda AC transit ILC hybrid meeting. No action shall be taken during a disruption that would prevent members of the public from offering public comments using the call-in or internet-based option. This meeting is being recorded for the members of the public who have dialed into this meeting by telephone. You must press star nine to raise your hand when the agenda item you would like to speak on is called, and the committee secretary will unmute you at the appropriate time and call the last four digits of your phone number. If you are attending the meeting via Zoom, you may use the raise your hand feature, and your name will be called when it is your turn to speak. If you decide not to speak, you may dial star nine or click lower your hand in Zoom. We request that all speakers clearly and slowly state their name for the record and make sure their location is quiet and that all other audio devices are turned off. Each speaker will be allowed two minutes to present their comments and will be notified when their time is up. Okay, so um agenda item one is roll call and welcome in introduction. Great. Um I will start with the City of Alameda representatives. We have Vice Mayor Pryor here. Thank you for chairing this morning. Uh Councilmember Deslag. Here. Representing AC Transit, we have Director Yellow and Director Sayed. Here, we can quickly go through staff introductions. Um good morning. My name is Robert Bel Rosari. I'm the director of service development and planning for AC Transit. Um I'll turn it over to Crystal. Uh Crystal Wayne Transportation Planner with AC Transit. Lisa Foster, Transportation Planning Manager, City of Alameda. We're in the side, Cheryl Fair's representative, legislative transit relations, AC Transit. Uh Brendan Christelier, uh Engineer Public Works Department, City of Alameda. Sean, these were contacting the planning manager, AC transit. We'll read some friends and transfer. And uh folks online, you can uh introduce yourself. Good morning, I'm Rama Pochara, executive direct for planning and engineering, AC Transit. Steve. Good morning, Stephen Jones, Director of Legislative Affairs, Community Relations AC Transit. Casey. HeC Bruno, Senior Transportation Planner. Deborah. Deborah Garcia, Customer Services Manager. And I'm Susan Davis. I manage community affairs for the school district. And Tammy Kailo, Secretary to this committee. That's it for introduction. I'd like to also welcome how we have Board President Ryan Lalon joining us from the Alameda Unified School District. Thank you, Ryan. Great. Oh sorry, announcement. So I don't believe there are any announcements at this time, right? Tammy, anyone online, public comments? There are no public comments at this time. All right, and then um do we have public comments in the room? Okay.