OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Alameda Planning Board Approves Site A Housing Increase with Commercial Clarity Conditions (July 25, 2022)

Planning BoardMonday, July 25, 2022
BodyAlameda, California
SessionPlanning Board
DateMonday, July 25, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Welcome to planning board meeting July 25th, um 2022.

0:06

That's called the meeting to order.

0:09

Before we move on to um FLAC salute, I would like to welcome and introduce board member Diana Ariza.

0:16

Um board member Lisa, would you like to make a brief statement?

0:21

Thank you.

0:21

I'm honored to be here, and I'm grateful for the nomination.

0:25

And I'm looking forward to working together.

0:27

I have lived in Alameda for about 16 years, and I work as an architect um designing schools.

1:02

Recording in progress.

1:08

Um Alan, would you mind calling local call?

1:11

Sure.

1:12

Um, just for the record, we have three absences, excuse absences tonight.

1:16

Um, President Sahaba, board member TIG, and board member Cisneros.

1:20

Um I will call on board member Areza.

1:23

Yes, present.

1:25

Uh Board Member Curtis.

1:26

Here.

1:27

Board Member Hong.

1:29

Here.

1:29

And Vice Chair Reese.

1:31

Here.

1:32

And we have four present.

1:33

We have a quorum.

1:37

Let's move on to agenda item number four.

1:39

Any agenda changes and discussion?

1:43

Uh yes.

1:44

So uh since we do not have a full board present tonight, um, we will continue uh item seven B board elections.

1:51

Thank you.

1:52

Otherwise, no other changes.

1:53

Thank you very much.

1:55

Um, let's move on to item number five, oral communications.

2:00

Anyone may address the board on a topic not on the agenda under this item by submitting a speaker information slip, subject to the three-minute time limit.

2:10

Do we have any um anybody that with their hands raised?

2:18

No one is raising their hands at the time.

2:21

Thank you.

2:23

Okay, seeing none.

2:24

Moving on to item number six, consent calendar.

2:28

Um, we don't have any item under that.

2:31

Now move on to uh agenda item number seven, regular agenda 7A.

2:37

Um Alan, do you have a presentation?

2:41

Uh yes, uh Vice Chair Riz, I do.

2:45

Um let me just first of all announce um Andrew Thomas is has been the project planner and leading this effort.

2:52

He unfortunately cannot make it tonight, so I will be filling in for him.

2:56

Um joining me tonight um is Stephanie Hill from Alameda Point Partners as well as Jessica Murphy from Cyprus Equity Investments.

3:04

And may the clerk's office um promote the two if you see them.

3:09

Oh, there they are.

3:11

Okay.

3:12

Um so let's see.

3:13

I have a um set of slides.

3:16

May I share screen.

3:21

Okay, thank you.

3:31

Okay, so good evening, um, chair and members of the planning board.

3:34

I'm Alan Tai, City Planner, again filling in for Andrew Thomas.

3:38

Um, we've been talking about site A for a number of years now.

3:41

Um going back to 2015, the city approved a development plan and a development agreement for um 800 units um at site A.

3:50

And the key about the site A project is that um it is new development into the for Alameda Naval Air Station.

3:58

Um and it there are several highlights from that plan.

4:02

Number one is um the city does not have the financial resources to replace the dilapidated obsolete um infrastructure that's serving the site.

4:10

So we are heavily reliant on private development to fund the infrastructure.

4:16

And if you want to think about the development of the future development of site A as um following uh site A future development site A and Alameda Point, relying on sort of the uh major infrastructure that's uh primarily underground.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Policy████████████████████████████████████████40%
Affordable Housing████████████████████20%
Procedural██████████████████18%
Infrastructure███████7%
Zoning Code█████5%
Public Comment█████5%
Parks and Recreation██2%
Community Engagement██2%
Development Agreement1%
Summary of Proceedings

Alameda Planning Board Approves Site A Housing Increase with Commercial Clarity Conditions (July 25, 2022)

The Alameda Planning Board met via Zoom on Monday, July 25, 2022, at 7:00 PM. Four members were present: Board Members Ariza, Curtis, Hom, and Vice Chair Ruiz presiding, constituting a quorum. President Saheba and Board Members Teague and Cisneros were excused. The board welcomed newly appointed Board Member Diana Ariza, who said she has lived in Alameda for about 16 years and works as an architect designing schools. The main item was a public hearing on the Alameda Point Site A Development Plan Amendment and Development Agreement Amendment to increase housing capacity. After initially voting to continue the item, the board reconsidered and approved both resolutions with conditions once the applicant supplied a block-by-block commercial square footage breakdown.

Convening and Roll Call

  • Meeting called to order at 7:00 PM; roll call showed four members present and a quorum.
  • Agenda change: Item 7-B (Board Elections) was continued to a future meeting because a full board was not present.
  • No consent calendar items were listed.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Karen Bay, a public commenter, said Site A is the waterfront town center and that retail is an important community benefit. She asked that the approximately 60,000 square feet of retail shown in the illustrative plan, including 50,000 square feet in Block 11 and 10,000 square feet in Block 10B, be memorialized in the development agreement and phasing plans. She also requested a detailed breakout of commercial square footage by type and phase, since the project was giving up a substantial amount of commercial space.

Discussion Items

  • Staff planner Alan Tai, filling in for Andrew Thomas, presented the amendments with Stephanie Hill of Alameda Point Partners and Jessica Murphy of Cypress Equity Investments. The proposal would add about 416 market-rate units and 194 affordable units at Site A to help meet the city's Regional Housing Needs Allocation. This would require reducing commercial square footage, including converting Block 10 from its originally envisioned large retail use to residential with ground-floor commercial.
  • Existing development at Site A includes 454 completed residential units and 220 units expected to start construction later in summer 2022. Two parks are complete, including a waterfront park that opened earlier in 2022. On-site affordability is set at 25 percent, which is higher than the citywide 15 percent requirement. Completed affordable projects include Corsair Flats, 60 senior units with set-asides for veterans and formerly homeless residents, and the Starling, 70 affordable family homes with set-asides for formerly homeless families. Aero Apartments provides 200 market-rate rental units.
  • Proposed Phase 1B includes Block 10 with 90 affordable homes along West Atlantic with ground-floor commercial, 88 market-rate units behind them, and 20 additional units in Block 1A. Phase 2 would include approximately 400 residential units (about 300 market-rate and 100 affordable), a community-oriented use adjacent to the waterfront park that could be a performing arts center, the second phase of the waterfront park at about 3.5 acres with a kayak launch, and critical infrastructure to support the neighboring West Midway project, which is planned for about 800 units.
  • Board Member Curtis asked about coordination and alignment of infrastructure with West Midway. Staff and the applicant said there was no joint tentative map, but design coordination is occurring with city staff and public works, and the disposition and development agreement includes a schedule of performance with mechanisms for the city to step in if infrastructure timing fails.
  • Board Member Hom asked where the additional units would be located and how much commercial space would be reduced. The applicant said Phase 2 commercial space would be reduced by approximately 175,000 square feet, and Block 10 retail would be reduced from about 65,000 square feet to about 10,000 square feet. Hom also asked about a public open-space connection, and staff said a public access easement would be addressed at the site plan stage.
  • Chair Ruiz and other board members raised concerns that the resolution used up to language and the development plan did not clearly show a block-by-block accounting of commercial and non-residential square footage. They said the development agreement should include a schedule specifying commercial square footage by block to avoid future misunderstandings and repeated amendments.
  • The board first voted 4-0 to continue the item for clarification. The applicant then provided block-by-block non-residential figures: Block 9, 10,000 square feet of retail; Block 10B, 10,500 square feet; Block 11, 15,000 square feet; Block 1B, 38,000 square feet of commercial; Block 3, 70,000 square feet; Block 4, 16,500 square feet of retail plus approximately 100,000 square feet of hotel; and a theater of approximately 53,000 square feet in Blocks 12A, 12B, and 13. Board Member Hom described the total as about 303,000 square feet.
  • The board voted 4-0 to reconsider the continuation motion, then took up a new motion to approve with conditions.

Key Outcomes

  • The Planning Board approved the resolution approving the Site A Development Plan Amendment (PLN22-0172) on a 4-0 vote. Conditions included updating the land use diagram/sheet 11 to reflect the commercial square footage presented, establishing a not less than minimum commercial floor area, and clarifying in the Development Agreement Amendment that the planning and zoning regulations are locked in as of the City Council's 2022 approval rather than the original 2015 agreement.
  • The board approved a separate resolution recommending that the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Development Agreement on a 4-0 vote.
  • Item 7-B on Board Elections was continued.
  • Staff reported that August is summer recess and September will be busy, with HCD comments on the Housing Element update expected, an Active Transportation Plan review, and other projects. A written communication from YIMBY Law to the California Department of Housing and Community Development dated July 8, 2022 was acknowledged.
  • Board Member Hom announced the APA California conference on October 1-4, 2022 in Anaheim, with a limited virtual option; Board Member Curtis encouraged new board members to attend planning commissioner training sessions.

No minutes were approved, and no further oral communications were received before adjournment.

Meeting Transcript

Welcome to planning board meeting July 25th, um 2022. That's called the meeting to order. Before we move on to um FLAC salute, I would like to welcome and introduce board member Diana Ariza. Um board member Lisa, would you like to make a brief statement? Thank you. I'm honored to be here, and I'm grateful for the nomination. And I'm looking forward to working together. I have lived in Alameda for about 16 years, and I work as an architect um designing schools. Recording in progress. Um Alan, would you mind calling local call? Sure. Um, just for the record, we have three absences, excuse absences tonight. Um, President Sahaba, board member TIG, and board member Cisneros. Um I will call on board member Areza. Yes, present. Uh Board Member Curtis. Here. Board Member Hong. Here. And Vice Chair Reese. Here. And we have four present. We have a quorum. Let's move on to agenda item number four. Any agenda changes and discussion? Uh yes. So uh since we do not have a full board present tonight, um, we will continue uh item seven B board elections. Thank you. Otherwise, no other changes. Thank you very much. Um, let's move on to item number five, oral communications. Anyone may address the board on a topic not on the agenda under this item by submitting a speaker information slip, subject to the three-minute time limit. Do we have any um anybody that with their hands raised? No one is raising their hands at the time. Thank you. Okay, seeing none. Moving on to item number six, consent calendar. Um, we don't have any item under that. Now move on to uh agenda item number seven, regular agenda 7A. Um Alan, do you have a presentation? Uh yes, uh Vice Chair Riz, I do. Um let me just first of all announce um Andrew Thomas is has been the project planner and leading this effort. He unfortunately cannot make it tonight, so I will be filling in for him. Um joining me tonight um is Stephanie Hill from Alameda Point Partners as well as Jessica Murphy from Cyprus Equity Investments. And may the clerk's office um promote the two if you see them. Oh, there they are. Okay. Um so let's see. I have a um set of slides. May I share screen.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com