OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Alameda Planning Board Meeting: November 14, 2022 – Housing Developments, Drive-Through Review, and All-Electric Building Code Workshop

Planning BoardMonday, November 14, 2022
BodyAlameda, California
SessionPlanning Board
DateMonday, November 14, 2022
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Thank you.

0:01

Good evening.

0:03

That's called the November 14th, 2002 planning board meeting.

0:10

To order.

0:11

And Alan, would you mind roll?

0:16

Actually, actually, yeah, let's do FLAF Salute first.

0:19

Board Member Sahaba, would you mind leading us?

0:23

Sure.

0:24

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States to America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

0:36

Thank you.

0:37

Roll call, please.

0:43

Here.

0:44

Board member Arisa.

0:46

Yes, here.

0:48

Board member Curtis.

0:50

Yeah.

0:50

Board Member Homs here.

0:53

Board Member Saheba.

0:55

Present.

0:56

Board Member Teague.

0:58

Here.

0:58

And Board Member Cisneros is not yet president, it looks like.

1:09

We have a quorum.

1:12

Moving on to agenda changes and discussions.

1:15

Do we have any agenda changes that's not noted on the notice?

1:20

None from staff.

1:22

Thank you very much.

1:23

Moving on to oral communications.

1:26

Anyone may address the board on a topic that's not on the agenda under this item.

1:31

Do we have any speaker information slip?

1:39

Seeing none, let's move on to item number six consent calendar, annual review of Alameda Landing Commercial Project Development.

1:57

Do I have a motion?

2:02

We don't need to do any emotions.

2:03

We don't need a motion.

2:04

Any board member can pull the consent item.

2:07

So that's now moving on to regular agent agenda item.

2:12

So given that I just pull item number six A.

2:15

Um that's start with that.

2:18

Um, board member T, I understand you have a question, so why don't I let you um start on that?

2:26

Uh would you please explain what's going to happen to the surplus funds and the existing TMA when it moves to the new TMA and what can be done with those funds.

2:41

This is Andrew Thomas, Planning Building Transportation Director.

2:44

The the idea here is we have two independent TMAs operating.

2:48

That the Alameda TMA should absorb the Alameda landing TMA.

2:53

So that means all of its members and its assets would move over to the Alameda TMA, um, including the surplus, which is the money that was spent that was contributed from the Alameda Landing property owners to the TMA.

3:10

So under the Alameda Landing TDM program, which is still the governing document, whether it's the West Alameda TMA or the eighth Alameda TMA, that's still the governing document.

3:25

Um that indicates that the two things that they that the Alameda landing um program should be implementing is transit passes and the water shuttle.

3:36

So from staff's perspective, ultimately ultimately it'd be the board members of the Alameda TMA, which will include representation from Alameda Landing.

3:45

Ultimately, the TMA decides how best to use the money.

3:48

But to if they're following the TDM plan, which they're supposed to, it's gonna say you should be funding a water shuttle and AC Transit Easy Passes.

3:58

So that's where the sir, I would think the surplus could go to the pilot program for the water shuttle, would be an ideal use of those surplus funds.

4:05

Thank you.

4:08

Um any other board member have questions?

4:10

If not, I I'm gonna proceed.

4:14

Okay.

4:15

My question is that from the report, I understand that the staff is recommending the dissolution of um West Alameda TMA.

4:23

What I'm unclear is um the and the report also stated that the current free shuttle between the target parking lot to Oakland 12th Street Station is within 50 feet of a AC transit stop um bus stop.

4:43

And what is unclear to me is uh what's gonna happen after the dissolution of um West Alameda TMA.

4:53

Does that mean that the shuttle goes away?

5:00

Or is the um the overall Alameda TMA going to continue to operate the shuttle?

5:06

So um the whether it's the West Alameda TMA or the Alameda TMA um deciding what to do with its resources, because that's the way these are set up.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Affordable Housing███████████████████████23%
Renewable Energy████████████████16%
Procedural█████████████13%
Housing█████████9%
Public Comment█████████9%
Urban Design██████6%
Bike Lane Enforcement█████5%
Public Engagement████4%
Transportation Safety███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Alameda Planning Board Meeting – November 14, 2022

The Alameda Planning Board met on November 14, 2022, via Zoom, to consider a consent calendar item, three regular agenda items, and a public workshop. The board approved an annual review of the Alameda Landing Development Agreements, a 227-unit multi-family project at 300 Mosley Avenue, and a use permit review for a Starbucks drive-through. A public workshop on proposed all-electric new construction and major alteration requirements was held for comment. Board member Ruiz recused herself from the 300 Mosley item due to a potential conflict.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 6-A (Annual Review of Alameda Landing Commercial and Residential Development Agreements) was pulled by the board president for discussion; no other consent items were approved.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 7-A (300 Mosley Avenue):
    • William Schumacher (resident of Admiral’s Cove) questioned why the building is proposed near his backyard rather than on a vacant lot across Lakehurst Street, noting the vacant lot is not used.
    • Jenna Stokes (resident) stated that residents received city notices only the Monday before the hearing, with no affirmative outreach from the applicant. She expressed concern over the loss of common open space (park, dog park, grills) and significant reduction of private yards for several townhomes.
    • Erica Holman (resident of the fourplex to be demolished) said she and her neighbors were told by management no such plans existed, and she faces visa complications if forced to move. The applicant later stated relocation is not imminent (likely not before 2024).
  • Item 7-C (All-Electric Reach Code Workshop): No public comments were received.

Discussion Items

  • 6-A: Annual Review of Alameda Landing Development Agreements – Staff presented the annual review of two development agreements for the Alameda Landing mixed-use commercial and residential projects. Board member Teague asked about surplus funds from the existing Transportation Management Association (TMA) and the fate of the free shuttle. Staff explained that the West Alameda TMA will dissolve and its assets (including surplus) will transfer to the Alameda TMA, which will decide how to use funds per the TDM plan (transit passes and water shuttle). Board member Hom raised equity concerns about replacing the free shuttle (open to all) with AC Transit Easy Passes (one per household). No public comment. The board voted 6-0 to approve the draft resolution.

  • 7-A: 300 Mosley Avenue – Development Plan, Design Review, and Density Bonus – Applicant Carmel Partners proposed a seven-story, 227-unit multi-family building on a 2.6-acre infill site within Admiral’s Cove (existing 150 townhome units). The project requires demolition of one existing fourplex (applicant hopes to relocate it). Key density bonus waivers requested: front yard setback reduction (5 ft vs. 20 ft), reduced private open space for 58 units, parking space size ratio (one space short of 50% standard), building height (74 ft/7 stories vs. 45 ft/4 stories), and bicycle parking (172 long-term vs. 227 required, 30 short-term vs. 46 required; the short-term reduction is the one concession). Staff recommended approval and suggested board could also approve the bicycle parking waiver. Board members asked about outreach to residents, park shade study, fire access, and design features. Public comments expressed concerns over notification, loss of open space, and yard reductions. Board discussion acknowledged SB330 constraints limiting denial options. Board member Curtis moved to approve with staff’s recommended amendments (including accepting bike parking waiver). Motion carried 5-0 (Ruiz recused).

  • 7-B: 980 Island Drive – Use Permit Review (Starbucks Drive-Through) – Staff reviewed traffic safety and circulation, finding no negative impacts. Board member Hom noted occasional queueing onto the street but not blocking traffic. No public comment. Board voted 6-0 to accept the staff report and authorize continued operations.

  • 7-C: Public Workshop – All-Electric Reach Code (2022 California Green Building Standards) – Staff presented a draft ordinance requiring newly constructed buildings and major alterations (≥50% foundation or framing replacement) to be all-electric, with exceptions for commercial kitchens, R&D/manufacturing, and existing legal entitlements. The draft also updates local climatic findings. Board members raised questions about definitions (repair vs. reinforcement, tenant improvements), impacts on landlord reinvestment, and an exception for “places of public accommodation” for commercial kitchens (which may inadvertently exclude food manufacturing). No formal action was taken; the item is a workshop to inform the City Council’s December 6 hearing.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 6-A: Approved 6-0.
  • Item 7-A: Approved 5-0 (Ruiz recused) with staff’s amended conditions, including acceptance of the bicycle parking waiver.
  • Item 7-B: Approved 6-0; continued use permit operations.
  • Item 7-C: No action taken; board comments to be forwarded to City Council.
  • Minutes: July 25, 2022 minutes approved 4-0-2 (Saheba present, Teague abstain) with corrections. September 12, 2022 minutes approved 4-0-2 (Curtis and Saheba abstain).
  • Next Meetings: November 28 meeting canceled; next meeting December 12 (agenda includes Penzaro site housing and Clement Avenue extension).

Meeting Transcript

Thank you. Good evening. That's called the November 14th, 2002 planning board meeting. To order. And Alan, would you mind roll? Actually, actually, yeah, let's do FLAF Salute first. Board Member Sahaba, would you mind leading us? Sure. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States to America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all. Thank you. Roll call, please. Here. Board member Arisa. Yes, here. Board member Curtis. Yeah. Board Member Homs here. Board Member Saheba. Present. Board Member Teague. Here. And Board Member Cisneros is not yet president, it looks like. We have a quorum. Moving on to agenda changes and discussions. Do we have any agenda changes that's not noted on the notice? None from staff. Thank you very much. Moving on to oral communications. Anyone may address the board on a topic that's not on the agenda under this item. Do we have any speaker information slip? Seeing none, let's move on to item number six consent calendar, annual review of Alameda Landing Commercial Project Development. Do I have a motion? We don't need to do any emotions. We don't need a motion. Any board member can pull the consent item. So that's now moving on to regular agent agenda item. So given that I just pull item number six A. Um that's start with that. Um, board member T, I understand you have a question, so why don't I let you um start on that? Uh would you please explain what's going to happen to the surplus funds and the existing TMA when it moves to the new TMA and what can be done with those funds. This is Andrew Thomas, Planning Building Transportation Director. The the idea here is we have two independent TMAs operating. That the Alameda TMA should absorb the Alameda landing TMA. So that means all of its members and its assets would move over to the Alameda TMA, um, including the surplus, which is the money that was spent that was contributed from the Alameda Landing property owners to the TMA. So under the Alameda Landing TDM program, which is still the governing document, whether it's the West Alameda TMA or the eighth Alameda TMA, that's still the governing document. Um that indicates that the two things that they that the Alameda landing um program should be implementing is transit passes and the water shuttle. So from staff's perspective, ultimately ultimately it'd be the board members of the Alameda TMA, which will include representation from Alameda Landing. Ultimately, the TMA decides how best to use the money. But to if they're following the TDM plan, which they're supposed to, it's gonna say you should be funding a water shuttle and AC Transit Easy Passes. So that's where the sir, I would think the surplus could go to the pilot program for the water shuttle, would be an ideal use of those surplus funds.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com