OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Alameda County, California/Board of Supervisors
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Alameda County Social Services Committee Meeting – October 1, 2026

Board of Supervisors — Thursday, October 1, 2026
BodyAlameda County, California
SessionBoard of Supervisors
DateThursday, October 1, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:12:59

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

So the reason we needed to break was because people uh online could not hear us.

Speaker 2

0:06

Well, if you would want us to do that, like to so that they get all of the information.

0:11

I don't

Speaker 1

0:11

let me find

Speaker 2

0:12

out from TISA.

Speaker 1

0:13

We need to start from the very beginning.

0:17

Okay.

Speaker 2

0:18

So uh once again, my name is Vincent Gordon.

0:21

I'm the program manager for the Alameda County Public Guardian and Public Conservators Office, and this is Monica Bruno, one of the probate supervisors with our department, and we're gonna give you a short presentation today on what our office does and any updates

Unassigned speaker

0:36

to

Speaker 2

0:36

the program and to the organization and staffing, etc.

0:40

So can move on to the first slide.

Unassigned speaker

0:43

So

Speaker 2

0:43

just an overview.

0:44

Um, you know, our department is uh guided by the probate code, and um the conservatorship cases that we deal with are all governed by the probate code.

0:56

Go on to the next slide.

Unassigned speaker

1:02

So

Speaker 2

1:02

the probate code uh dates back to 1931, and it's the statutory framework intended to protect the rights of people who are under a conservatorship.

1:12

And a conservatorship is a form of a legal arrangement to manage the affairs of an adult, similar to a guardianship for a for a child, but for an adult, and it mandates periodic review of the conservatorship by the court investigator to make sure that we're operating in their best interest.

1:32

Uh you skip to a different slideshow.

1:38

All right.

1:39

Next slide.

Speaker 3

1:45

And also the probate code, it dictates the conservative's basic need for physical health, food, clothing, and shelter are met, and they consider the least restrictive setting.

1:57

So when you look for the public guardian, it's the least restrictive.

2:01

They have all their alternatives before us, and it also provides for the proper management and protection of the conservative's real and personal property.

Speaker 4

2:10

Next slide.

Unassigned speaker

2:13

So

Speaker 2

2:14

the role of the court, the conservator is subject to control and oversight of the court.

2:18

Everything that we do at our office, the court um you know is gonna scrutinize and um and we have to present you know various um documentation and accountings.

2:29

Um the judge assigns a probate examiner and a court investigator, so the court has its own um staffing that uh will follow up and investigate the same information and an examiner to look at the the assets um that are being held by our conservator to make sure everything is you know um that we're in agreement.

Speaker 3

2:52

Okay, and the probate court determines the powers and duties of the conservator, and the probate court considers the reports of the probate court investigator and different parties, including the conservative and their council, and has the sole discretion to determine the best interests of the conservative.

3:09

Next slide.

Unassigned speaker

3:12

So

Speaker 2

3:12

there's a couple different types of conservatorships.

3:14

Um the first one mentioned is a limited conservatorship, those are generally for um people with developmental disabilities, and there's a specific set of powers that are um petitioned for.

3:26

Uh, our office does not do a lot of those, but we do have a couple and um are occasionally asked to uh investigate those cases.

3:34

Um, then there's a general conservatorships, and then there's two basic categories there's conservatorship of person, and then there's a conservatorship of a state.

3:43

Um, under conservatorship of person, there are additional uh powers that we would have to petition for, including medical decision making authority, um, psychotropic medication authority and placement in what's called a secure perimeter.

3:58

Aside from that, our office also does LPS conservatorships, which stands for the Lanterman Petra Short Act.

4:05

These are conservatorships for people with severe mental health uh disabilities.

4:10

Um, the rules for uh you know um detain and then you know, uh providing clinical treatment to those folks in order to restore them to competency is governed by the Lannerman Petra Short Act, which sets up a series of holds where at each point they determine whether the person is what's called gravely disabled, meaning unable to provide for their own food, clothing, or shelter, or a threat to themselves or others.

Unassigned speaker

4:39

Okay,

Speaker 3

4:39

next slide.

Speaker 2

4:40

We're

Speaker 4

4:40

gonna

Speaker 3

4:42

okay.

4:43

Appointment procedure.

4:44

So the public guardian, also known as the PG.

4:47

We petition for conservatorship of person and or a state if there's any imminent threat to the person's health or safety or to the person's estate, and there's no one else who is qualified and willing to act.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

And also the probate court may sometimes appoint the PG to investigate as well.

Speaker 3

5:05

And the third bullet point, that's a misprint.

5:08

In 2018, the PG was appointed by the probate court, less than 25% of conservatorship cases.

5:15

Currently, the PG is appointed on only 17% of conservatorship cases in the probate court right now.

5:22

Next slide.

Speaker 5

5:25

Samantha Stoner can assistant county counsel.

5:28

So county council represents the PG in all cases where either the PG is appointed or otherwise involved in the case that may happen in temporary or general appointments or as a successor trustee or appointed as the guardian.

5:43

We review all filings and advise the PG in all areas.

5:48

Next slide.

5:51

Conservatees also get appointed counsel.

5:55

They are mandatory appointed counsel.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Child Welfare Services██████████████████████████████████████████42%
Adult Protective Services████████████████████████24%
Senior Services████████8%
Public Health Services██████6%
Public Assistance██████6%
Public Engagement██████6%
Community Engagement██2%
Budget Process█1%
Public Comment█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Alameda County Social Services Committee Meeting – October 1, 2026

The Social Services Committee of the Alameda County Board of Supervisors convened on October 1, 2026, to receive annual updates from the Public Guardian, the Area Agency on Aging, the Department of Child Support Services, and the 12th status update on the State Auditor’s findings regarding the Department of Children and Family Services. No votes were taken; all items were informational.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Marilyn Harris spoke on Agenda Item I (Public Guardian Annual Update). No other public comments were made.

Discussion Items

I. Public Guardian Annual Update

  • Presenters: Vincent Gordon (Program Manager, Dept. of Adult & Aging Services), Samantha N. Stonework-Hand (Assistant County Counsel), Kirsten Voyles (Legal Director, Legal Assistance for Seniors).
  • Overview of the Public Guardian’s role in probate and LPS conservatorships, governed by the Probate Code (dating to 1931) and the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act.
  • Staffing: Two probate units with 6 vacancies; average probate caseload rose 40%—from 19 to 27 cases per worker over two years.
  • Financial oversight: The Public Guardian manages approximately $27.7 million in assets, serving about 155 conservatees (majority over age 70 in skilled nursing facilities).
  • LPS program: Caseloads remained consistent (avg. 44 cases per worker) but challenging due to mental health recidivism and placement difficulties.
  • Care Court (presented earlier by Judge Bean) has not increased LPS referrals and may offer a less restrictive alternative.

II. Area Agency on Aging Annual Update

  • Presenter: Kim Fogle (Management Analyst, substituting for Jennifer Stephens-Pierre).
  • The AAA network provides about 200,000 congregate meals and distributes nearly 10,000 bags of groceries annually; an estimated 80,000 older adults rely on AAA-funded programs.
  • Contracts: 77 contracts totaling $17.5 million in the last four-year cycle; new RFP awarded 53 contracts worth $15 million for the next four years.
  • Accomplishments: 140 new Certified Nursing Assistants graduated from the healthcare career pathways program in three years; supported passage of AB 1069 (emergency shelter access for older adults).
  • Upcoming events: Holiday basket distribution (Dec. 11) and Aging Well & Planning Ahead Forum (Apr. 16, 2027).
  • Staffing: AAA has two vacancies (clerk and administrative specialist). Assistant Agency Director Faith Battles noted significant understaffing in IHSS social worker positions (caseloads over 400) and ongoing fines for failing to complete annual assessments.

III. Department of Child Support Services Annual Update

  • Presenter: Vangeria Harvey (Acting Director).
  • Caseload: Over 25,000 families, including 4,000+ currently on CalWORKs; over $72 million collected and distributed in the current federal fiscal year (through August).
  • Performance metrics: Parentage establishment 98.8%; order establishment 91.2%; current support collections 68.3%; arrears collections 63.9%—ranking in the top quarter of California counties.
  • Legislation: SB 1264 (expanded notification of estate for child support arrears), AB 2195 (protects low-income parents from commercial license suspension), AB 747 (effective Jan. 1, 2027, requires GPS‑stamped photos for service of process).
  • Outreach: First Family Resource Fair (200+ families), Dad discussions, and participation in the “Together We Give” campaign.

IV. Department of Children and Family Services Status Update #12

  • Presenter: Michelle Love (Assistant Agency Director, DCFS).
  • Progress on State Auditor’s recommendations (2024-108) and the California Department of Social Services Corrective Action Plan (CAP).
  • Timeliness of investigations: Digital assignment board implemented; supervisor oversight strengthened; vacancy rate in emergency response reduced to 5.8% (down from higher levels in September 2025).
  • Staffing: Expanding emergency response from 31 staff (Aug. 2024) to 59 by end of 2026; new four-week on-the-job training added.
  • Family finding contract: From June 1 to Sept. 1, 2026, 394 relatives identified; 91 youth served (ages 14–26); 33 youth completed services.
  • Transitional shelter care facility: Reopened April 3, 2026; 19 intakes through August; policies submitted; meetings now occurring.
  • Training compliance: 92.6% of supervisors and 82.5% of workers completed required hours.
  • Safety culture survey: Response rate 53% in 2026 (similar to 54% in 2025); emotional exhaustion slightly increased (37%); physical safety improved; scores comparable to national benchmarks.
  • CDSS will oversee the CAP with monthly meetings for two years; the CAP is due October 1, 2026.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal motions or votes occurred; all items were received as information.
  • Supervisor Fortunato Bas recommended establishing an advisory board (composed of the Interagency Coordinating Council and additional experts) to guide long‑term transformation of child welfare services. Discussion highlighted existing oversight from CDSS and the ICC, with caution about adding extra demands on DCFS staff.
  • The committee will receive continued updates on the Corrective Action Plan and the organizational assessment by Baker Tilly.

Meeting Transcript

So the reason we needed to break was because people uh online could not hear us. Well, if you would want us to do that, like to so that they get all of the information. I don't let me find out from TISA. We need to start from the very beginning. Okay. So uh once again, my name is Vincent Gordon. I'm the program manager for the Alameda County Public Guardian and Public Conservators Office, and this is Monica Bruno, one of the probate supervisors with our department, and we're gonna give you a short presentation today on what our office does and any updates to the program and to the organization and staffing, etc. So can move on to the first slide. So just an overview. Um, you know, our department is uh guided by the probate code, and um the conservatorship cases that we deal with are all governed by the probate code. Go on to the next slide. So the probate code uh dates back to 1931, and it's the statutory framework intended to protect the rights of people who are under a conservatorship. And a conservatorship is a form of a legal arrangement to manage the affairs of an adult, similar to a guardianship for a for a child, but for an adult, and it mandates periodic review of the conservatorship by the court investigator to make sure that we're operating in their best interest. Uh you skip to a different slideshow. All right. Next slide. And also the probate code, it dictates the conservative's basic need for physical health, food, clothing, and shelter are met, and they consider the least restrictive setting. So when you look for the public guardian, it's the least restrictive. They have all their alternatives before us, and it also provides for the proper management and protection of the conservative's real and personal property. Next slide. So the role of the court, the conservator is subject to control and oversight of the court. Everything that we do at our office, the court um you know is gonna scrutinize and um and we have to present you know various um documentation and accountings. Um the judge assigns a probate examiner and a court investigator, so the court has its own um staffing that uh will follow up and investigate the same information and an examiner to look at the the assets um that are being held by our conservator to make sure everything is you know um that we're in agreement. Okay, and the probate court determines the powers and duties of the conservator, and the probate court considers the reports of the probate court investigator and different parties, including the conservative and their council, and has the sole discretion to determine the best interests of the conservative. Next slide. So there's a couple different types of conservatorships. Um the first one mentioned is a limited conservatorship, those are generally for um people with developmental disabilities, and there's a specific set of powers that are um petitioned for. Uh, our office does not do a lot of those, but we do have a couple and um are occasionally asked to uh investigate those cases. Um, then there's a general conservatorships, and then there's two basic categories there's conservatorship of person, and then there's a conservatorship of a state. Um, under conservatorship of person, there are additional uh powers that we would have to petition for, including medical decision making authority, um, psychotropic medication authority and placement in what's called a secure perimeter. Aside from that, our office also does LPS conservatorships, which stands for the Lanterman Petra Short Act. These are conservatorships for people with severe mental health uh disabilities. Um, the rules for uh you know um detain and then you know, uh providing clinical treatment to those folks in order to restore them to competency is governed by the Lannerman Petra Short Act, which sets up a series of holds where at each point they determine whether the person is what's called gravely disabled, meaning unable to provide for their own food, clothing, or shelter, or a threat to themselves or others. Okay, next slide. We're gonna okay. Appointment procedure. So the public guardian, also known as the PG. We petition for conservatorship of person and or a state if there's any imminent threat to the person's health or safety or to the person's estate, and there's no one else who is qualified and willing to act. And also the probate court may sometimes appoint the PG to investigate as well.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com