OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Alameda County, California/Board of Supervisors
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Alameda County Together for All Ad Hoc Committee Meeting – October 9, 2026 (Agenda dated October 8)

Board of Supervisors — Friday, October 9, 2026
BodyAlameda County, California
SessionBoard of Supervisors
DateFriday, October 9, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:57:10

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:00

Good

Speaker 2

0:00

afternoon, everyone.

0:02

The meeting of the Alameda County Together for All Ad hoc committee shall come to order.

0:07

Let's call the role.

0:09

Supervisor Marquez

Speaker 3

0:11

present.

0:11

Supervisor Fortinado Bass.

Speaker 2

0:22

Thank you.

0:23

And Madam Clerk, could you please give instructions for public comment and interpretation?

Speaker 3

0:30

For in-person participation, the meeting site is open to the public.

0:34

If you'd like to speak on an item, please fill out a speaker's card in the front of the room and place it in the box for remote participation.

0:42

Follow the teleconferencing guidelines posted at www.acub.org.

0:48

And we do have Spanish interpretation in the back.

0:54

Carmen and Carmen and Christine.

Speaker 2

1:03

Carmen or Christine, would you mind coming to the mic to share interpretation instructions in Spanish.

Unassigned speaker

1:17

Okay.

Speaker 4

1:18

Hola, hola.

1:19

Si usa ni interprete, entonces hay que hablar lentamente, claramente, con pausas, para que las interpretes podamos seguir cada palabra porque is muy importante lo que dicen.

1:33

Gracias.

Speaker 2

1:39

Okay, thank you, everyone.

1:41

I'll share a few welcoming and framing remarks before we review the agenda.

1:46

So again, welcome to the Alameda County Together for All or Act for All Ad Hoc Committee, which prioritizes inclusion, equity, and opportunity for all residents.

1:58

As background, our committee is modeled after the 2017 ad hoc committee for immigrant and refugee rights by late supervisors Wilma Chan and Richard Vaillet.

2:10

The Act for All Committee is a vehicle to coordinate a proactive response to protect support and lift up communities that are impacted by federal policies and budgets.

2:20

And we have focused on a number of topics over the past year and a half, including immigrant and refugee justice, LGBTQ health equity, and food security.

2:33

Before we get started, I do want to share a few updates since our last meeting in July.

2:39

Firstly, in terms of immigrant and refugee justice, in September, the new public charge rule went into effect.

2:48

And the federal administration is giving immigration officers more power to deny green cards and visas to immigrants who use public benefits.

2:58

And this could include Medi-Cal, CalFresh, housing vouchers, unemployment, and other programs.

3:06

This change in policy is cruel and could cause even more people to fear seeking important social services that they need.

3:16

Nationally, immigration arrests have soared to new levels with nearly 50,000 arrests nationwide in July.

3:23

California has the third highest number of these arrests, and DHS and ICE are expanding detention capacity.

4:04

Enabling individuals to sue federal officials and state court over rights violations and requiring local agencies to release 911 call records originating from ICE facilities.

Unassigned speaker

4:18

As

Speaker 2

4:19

you know, we've also looked at immigration detention right here at home.

4:23

And in regards to FCI Dublin, the former federal correction facility in Dublin, California, you may remember that in April, our board adopted a resolution opposing the use of FCI Dublin for immigration detention.

4:40

In September, the Federal Bureau of Prisons received over 7,500 comments calling for the demolition of FCI Dublin so it's never used for carceral purposes again, including a letter from my office.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

Yet, despite this public outcry, the Bureau of Prisons maintained its finding that allows it to transfer the 80 safe the 87-acre property to the Federal General Services Administration, who has a unit that has been tasked with acquiring land for immigration detention facilities and could sell or transfer the FCI Dublin to DHS or ICE.

Unassigned speaker

5:22

The

Speaker 2

5:22

threat of local detention continues as ICE expands its property holdings.

5:27

And just this week, DHS bought two detention facilities in Southern California for 950 million dollars.

5:36

So let's keep organizing.

5:38

The ICE Out of Dublin Coalition has been canvassing our Dublin residents.

5:43

Please join the coalition and Dublin Tri-Valley and Alameda County residents this Saturday, October 10th, from 10 a.m.

5:52

to 12 noon in Dublin to stop the opening of an ICE descent detention center in our region.

6:00

And you can register at TinyURL.com slash IOD hyphen OCT 10.

6:11

And we'll try to add that to our social media so it's a bit easier to find.

6:16

In addition, in Gilroy, you may remember that there is a proposed immigration facility, and that proposed facility in Gilroy, which is in Santa Clara County, has been legally suspended as of September 30th.

6:32

It's facing a high profile legal battle over environmental procedural community concerns with the next major decision due today or tomorrow.

6:44

And a final court decision could determine whether ICE may conduct limited activities on the site while the injunction remains in effect.

6:54

And I also wanted to note in terms of immigrant justice that at one of our recent board meetings, the three community coalitions that we have been that we have been supporting for rapid response, legal services, and mutual aid and organizing those three coalitions got an extension of their contracts through the end of this fiscal year.

7:18

So we do hope that the community will continue to stay engaged because this issue has no but has by no means subsided.

7:26

It has only become even more urgent.

7:28

And in fact, about two weeks ago, I accompanied a dear friend to their ICE check-in and witness them being taken away from their family, and I'm trying to support that person.

7:40

So it's something that touches many of us.

7:52

So we continue to advance stronger oversight of surveillance technologies, artificial intelligence, and data governance.

7:59

At our May 12 board meeting after discussions of contracts with Flock and Pereguan, I raised the importance of developing a framework and standard services agreement that protects the civil rights of our residents and aligns with modern public sector privacy, cybersecurity, civil rights, and surveillance governance standards.

8:21

The board supported this direction and we had requested that the procurement and contracting policy committee potentially take up looking at a potential standard services agreement.

8:35

Recently, in June on June 30th, the board voted with a vote of three to two to approve an 18-month-long contract with Flock Safety for three different types of services, license plate readers, cameras, and drones.

8:49

And while the contract does include several new safeguards in response to the board's feedback in April, we did have limited time to thoroughly review that.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Food Security████████████████████████████████32%
Public Safety██████████████████18%
Technology and Innovation█████████████13%
Public Assistance███████████11%
Immigration Policy███████7%
Public Engagement███████7%
Artificial Intelligence███3%
Public Comment███3%
Procedural██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Alameda County Together for All Ad Hoc Committee Meeting – October 9, 2026

Note: The agenda and meeting transcript reference October 8, 2026, but the provided timestamp is October 9, 2026 20:15 UTC. This summary uses the given date as instructed.

The meeting, chaired by Supervisor Nikki Fortunato Bas, focused on the Hunger Action Month Proclamation and a one-year update on the Food Sovereignty Roundtable, followed by a presentation on networked surveillance and county leadership by Sarah Hamid of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). A third agenda item on surveillance ecosystems was postponed to November 5, 2026. Public comments addressed both agenda items and non-agenda matters.

Consent Calendar

  • No consent calendar items were listed.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 1 (Food Sovereignty): Multiple speakers expressed support for the Food Sovereignty Roundtable and the county's $50 million investment (Measure W). Speakers included Chiamaka Ogwebu (Alameda County Office of Education), Maria Alderetti (Community Kitchens), Katie Greenwald (Berkeley Food Network), Alma Zideko (Global Communication Education and Art, African Resource Center), and Kendall (Feed Black Futures). They highlighted the importance of community partnerships, the need to address chronic food insecurity (noting it can shorten life by 17 years), and the call for direct funding to marginalized farmers and organizations serving immigrants and seniors.
  • Item 2 (Surveillance): Blanca (Tubu, representing ACODE and ACCORD coalitions) and Itlali (Trabajadores Unidos Workers United) urged the committee to end mass surveillance systems like Flock and ALPRs, stating they threaten communities and undermine sanctuary protections. They also requested that the board hold off on putting Act for Our Coalition funding into an RFP until after the current administration, as an RFP would disrupt ongoing support work.
  • Non-Agenda: Zoe Polk (Executive Director, East Bay Community Law Center) thanked the board for a nine-month extension for ACODE/ACCORD funding and requested unconditional renewal without an RFP process, citing the coalition's service to 771 county residents (257% of target) and the growing need due to potential immigration enforcement.

Discussion Items

  • Item 1: Hunger Action Month Proclamation & One-Year Update of the Food Sovereignty Roundtable

    • Aliza Kazmi (Director of Community Partnerships, Office of Supervisor Fortunato Bas) framed the work: the board secured over $50 million over three fiscal years, with $3.6 million for neighborhood-based food systems. Data from June 2026 showed 3,700+ refugees and asylees lost CalFresh benefits; 23,000 people (later reduced to 12,000 due to state system improvements) were subject to ABOD work requirements; and 1,782 fewer children under 6 received CalFresh since July 2025 (an 8% decline).
    • Antoinette Burns (Social Services Agency) reported that the ABOD-exempt population dropped from 23,000 to 12,000 as of September 2026, with 26% elderly (ages 60–64) and 22% unhoused. She outlined efforts including a voluntary CalFresh Employment and Training Program, a workfare program starting January 1, 2027, and partnerships with philanthropic groups (Tipping Point, Aurora Health Group) for technology automation. A town hall meeting and marketing materials (bus shelter ads, billboards) are in development.
    • Tunisha Owens (Alameda County Community Food Bank) reported that Measure W funds supported 350,000 prepared meals for unhoused neighbors as of September 30, 2026 (nearly 5,000 meals per month). The RFP for Market Match, food recovery, and food resilience grants closed October 1 with 81 applications; awards are expected by December 2026.
    • Jeffrey Ja Wong (City of Oakland) described SB 1383-driven investments in city-owned commercial kitchens ($200,000 committed) and participation in the Roundtable's procurement and production working group to expand land access for urban growers.
    • Ali Anderson (Feed Black Futures) shared a story of a client who transitioned from food recipient to catering business owner, and called for direct funding to community organizations and protection of SNAP for formerly incarcerated people.
    • Linda Leu (TCV Food Bank) noted the closure of a 50-year-old food distribution site in Hayward and the need for collaborative solutions.
    • Elaine Smith (Farms to Grow) emphasized food production support for hyperlocal BIPOC farmers and submitted an RFP for technical assistance and heritage garden programs.
    • Supervisor Márquez thanked the group, highlighted geographic representation, and asked about the RFP review process. Tunisha Owens confirmed awards by December, with a review process running through October and November, and flexibility for applicants to update proposals.
  • Item 2: The Era of Networked Surveillance & County Leadership

    • Sarah Hamid (EFF) presented on automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and the growth of mass surveillance networks. Key points: ALPRs capture 99.99% of data unrelated to public safety; data leaves local systems via front, side, and backdoor pathways (e.g., 4,000+ federal lookups by local police); Flock Safety has raised $1 billion and is valued at $8.3 billion, with a business model dependent on network effects. Hamid argued that surveillance purchasing is not inevitable and outlined a co-governance framework (map, build, case, force, hold). She noted that Alameda County purchased surveillance piecemeal (e.g., 2015 stingray policy, 2023 Flock piggyback contract, June 2026 Flock consolidation for $2.4 million). The next major decision is the Axon body camera renewal (contract ends August 2027), which could expand from 6 to 16 products. She recommended ending ALPR network sharing rather than relying on guardrails, citing failed policies (e.g., Austin's 7-day retention policy circumvented by CSV exports).
    • Supervisor Márquez asked about mission/function creep; Hamid explained how data collected for narrow purposes (e.g., auto theft) is later repurposed for immigration enforcement or consumer profiling.
    • Supervisor Fortunato Bas noted the usefulness of the information and the need to further explore the county's aggregated surveillance network.

Key Outcomes

  • Food Sovereignty Roundtable: The committee accepted the one-year update. The Hunger Action Month Proclamation was recognized (adopted by the board earlier in September 2026). No formal vote was taken during this meeting.
  • Surveillance Presentation: No immediate action or vote; the committee heard the informational item and will continue discussions at future meetings. The postponed item on surveillance ecosystems will be taken up on November 5, 2026.
  • Public Comments (Non-Agenda): No board response to the request for unconditional renewal of ACODE/ACCORD funding; the issue may be brought to a full board meeting.
  • Next Meeting: Thursday, November 5, 2026, at 3:00 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon, everyone. The meeting of the Alameda County Together for All Ad hoc committee shall come to order. Let's call the role. Supervisor Marquez present. Supervisor Fortinado Bass. Thank you. And Madam Clerk, could you please give instructions for public comment and interpretation? For in-person participation, the meeting site is open to the public. If you'd like to speak on an item, please fill out a speaker's card in the front of the room and place it in the box for remote participation. Follow the teleconferencing guidelines posted at www.acub.org. And we do have Spanish interpretation in the back. Carmen and Carmen and Christine. Carmen or Christine, would you mind coming to the mic to share interpretation instructions in Spanish. Okay. Hola, hola. Si usa ni interprete, entonces hay que hablar lentamente, claramente, con pausas, para que las interpretes podamos seguir cada palabra porque is muy importante lo que dicen. Gracias. Okay, thank you, everyone. I'll share a few welcoming and framing remarks before we review the agenda. So again, welcome to the Alameda County Together for All or Act for All Ad Hoc Committee, which prioritizes inclusion, equity, and opportunity for all residents. As background, our committee is modeled after the 2017 ad hoc committee for immigrant and refugee rights by late supervisors Wilma Chan and Richard Vaillet. The Act for All Committee is a vehicle to coordinate a proactive response to protect support and lift up communities that are impacted by federal policies and budgets. And we have focused on a number of topics over the past year and a half, including immigrant and refugee justice, LGBTQ health equity, and food security. Before we get started, I do want to share a few updates since our last meeting in July. Firstly, in terms of immigrant and refugee justice, in September, the new public charge rule went into effect. And the federal administration is giving immigration officers more power to deny green cards and visas to immigrants who use public benefits. And this could include Medi-Cal, CalFresh, housing vouchers, unemployment, and other programs. This change in policy is cruel and could cause even more people to fear seeking important social services that they need. Nationally, immigration arrests have soared to new levels with nearly 50,000 arrests nationwide in July. California has the third highest number of these arrests, and DHS and ICE are expanding detention capacity. Enabling individuals to sue federal officials and state court over rights violations and requiring local agencies to release 911 call records originating from ICE facilities. As you know, we've also looked at immigration detention right here at home. And in regards to FCI Dublin, the former federal correction facility in Dublin, California, you may remember that in April, our board adopted a resolution opposing the use of FCI Dublin for immigration detention. In September, the Federal Bureau of Prisons received over 7,500 comments calling for the demolition of FCI Dublin so it's never used for carceral purposes again, including a letter from my office. Yet, despite this public outcry, the Bureau of Prisons maintained its finding that allows it to transfer the 80 safe the 87-acre property to the Federal General Services Administration, who has a unit that has been tasked with acquiring land for immigration detention facilities and could sell or transfer the FCI Dublin to DHS or ICE. The threat of local detention continues as ICE expands its property holdings. And just this week, DHS bought two detention facilities in Southern California for 950 million dollars. So let's keep organizing. The ICE Out of Dublin Coalition has been canvassing our Dublin residents. Please join the coalition and Dublin Tri-Valley and Alameda County residents this Saturday, October 10th, from 10 a.m. to 12 noon in Dublin to stop the opening of an ICE descent detention center in our region. And you can register at TinyURL.com slash IOD hyphen OCT 10. And we'll try to add that to our social media so it's a bit easier to find. In addition, in Gilroy, you may remember that there is a proposed immigration facility, and that proposed facility in Gilroy, which is in Santa Clara County, has been legally suspended as of September 30th. It's facing a high profile legal battle over environmental procedural community concerns with the next major decision due today or tomorrow. And a final court decision could determine whether ICE may conduct limited activities on the site while the injunction remains in effect.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com