OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing - July 6, 2026

Public MeetingsMonday, July 6, 2026
BodyAlexandria, Virginia
SessionPublic Meetings
DateMonday, July 6, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 11:11
Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Any guys are this meeting is called to order.

0:04

We're gonna proceed tonight with applications and other agenda items in the order that they're indicated on the docket.

0:10

Limited copies of tonight's agenda in each staff report are available uh right over there in the corner on a first come first serve basis.

0:16

If you are an applicant, please be sure to read the staff report for your case.

0:20

For each application, we will proceed in the following order of business.

0:24

The applicant or the applicant's representative may present the proposal or just be available for questions.

0:30

It's up to you.

0:31

The public will have an opportunity to speak on each application.

0:35

Members of the public should fill out a speaker form and hand it over here to Miss Lane if you would like to speak on night.

0:42

Uh if you're speaking for yourself, you have three minutes, and if you're speaking on behalf of the civic organization, you have five minutes.

0:49

After public comment is complete, the applicant may respond to public comments, but it's not required to.

0:55

Um there will then be board deliberation.

0:58

The board may ask the applicants questions and just engage in a dialogue.

1:02

After deliberation, the board can take one of several actions.

1:06

The board can vote on a motion to issue, conditionally issue or deny a certificate of appropriation of appropriateness upon request by an applicant.

1:27

If the board takes no action at the next regularly scheduled meeting, then the certificate of appropriateness is automatically issued.

1:35

I will make a couple of comments on voting here.

1:37

Votes uh motions pass by a simple majority vote.

1:41

A tie vote results in no action being taken on the motion.

1:45

And if the board votes to deny an application, a similar application will not be considered for a period of one year following the denial.

1:53

The board occasionally takes up matters other than applications for certificate of appropriateness, and the public will have an opportunity to comment on those as well.

2:02

Uh applicants are allowed to appeal any decision by the board to the city council.

2:07

Applications have to be made within 14 days of the board's decision and in conform uh in conformance with the applicable zoning regulations.

2:16

So with that said, Mr.

2:17

Conte, let's get going.

2:19

Okay.

2:20

Uh good is yes.

2:23

Uh consideration of the minutes from the June 17th BAR meeting.

2:27

Does any member wish to suggest modifications or changes to the June 17th minutes?

2:34

Does any member of the public have any modifications to suggest to the June 17th minutes?

2:39

Seeing none, can we have a motion on the minutes?

2:41

So moved.

2:42

Second?

2:43

Second.

2:44

All those in favor of adopting the minutes from the June 17th meeting say aye.

2:49

Aye.

2:50

Any opposed?

2:51

The minutes are adopted.

2:52

Okay, on to the consent count.

2:54

All right, thank you very much.

2:54

We have one item on the consent panel tonight.

2:57

Uh VAR 2026-00152.

3:01

All this poll and it's worth district.

3:03

Request for signage and operations of 400 K Street speaker two parcel addresses 480k Street.

3:08

The applicant is like a live organic cafe represented by Gary Marks.

3:13

All right, does any member of the board wish to remove this item from the consent calendar?

3:19

Ms.

3:19

Miller?

3:20

All right.

3:21

Just have a question.

3:22

Sure.

3:22

Um, we can take that to the first order.

3:27

Great.

3:27

So under new business, the question is.

3:43

Is the applicant here today?

3:45

Hi, come on up.

3:46

Uh shoot.

3:46

We usually have our A V cart there for you to rest on, but now you just have to stand there.

3:54

Okay.

3:54

Um maybe you know trap door.

3:58

It sounds like we just have a question, so Ms.

4:00

Miller.

4:00

No problem.

4:01

Hi.

4:02

Hi.

4:03

Uh I was wondering why the live is off center.

4:09

Why is it all center?

4:11

Um I believe, so if you look at it, it's actually I don't think it's all centered.

4:16

The small letter, if there's organic cafe letters next to it, it is centered on that canopy.

4:22

Well also included in the uh application.

4:24

Again, you look at the elevation there.

4:27

I believe it is centered.

4:28

Or should it be centered?

4:31

Or we can.

4:32

It's over the door.

4:34

All that should be centered over the door.

4:36

Yes, it's not what's in the package.

4:37

Is that right?

4:38

It is centered.

4:39

It's just hard to read the cafe.

4:43

It is similar to the right.

4:47

Okay.

4:48

Yeah, if you're just a whole point.

4:53

It's hard to see the elevation.

4:55

So we're digitally printed.

4:57

So sorry about that.

4:58

Oh, that's all right.

5:00

It's all right.

5:00

I just wonder.

5:01

I think that makes sense.

5:03

Thank you.

5:04

No problem.

5:05

Any other questions from board members on this one?

5:08

Do we have any public speakers who want to speak on this application?

5:12

Okay, we'll close the public input portion for this item.

5:16

Anyone have a motion on this?

5:17

Move to approve her staff recommendations.

5:20

Okay.

5:20

All those in favor of adopting BAR 2026 00152, consent calendar item number three.

5:30

Say aye.

5:31

Aye.

5:31

Any opposed?

5:33

Congratulations.

5:34

Thank you.

5:36

Okay, Mr.

5:37

Conkey, moving on to our next new business.

5:40

Second item item under business tonight is item number four.

5:44

This is DAR 2026-00164 over district.

5:52

The applicant is Margaret and Robert Pascal.

5:55

Are you the applicants?

5:57

Come on up to our blue X.

6:01

Unfortunately, we do need you to be there in order to like catch your voices, but if you would like to state your name and address for the record, you can then present information to us or just answer the board's questions, whatever you're comfortable with.

6:13

Robert Pascarella, after called Ross Fairfax.

6:17

And Margaret Pascarella.

6:19

And we're just saying it's already questions there.

6:22

Great.

6:23

I'll open it up to the board.

6:24

Does anyone have any questions on this?

6:26

Well, I guess I was wondering why you ordered like replacement windows instead of interesting.

6:35

So full framework placement.

6:46

Ms.

6:47

Lane, do we have any speakers on this one?

6:50

We'll close the public portion of this item.

6:55

I'll just sway in briefly.

6:57

Sometimes we do oppose insert windows.

6:59

I will say just based on the fact this is not it's a modern building and the window is pretty far from the public right away.

7:06

It seems appropriate in my assessment, but I open it up to the other members of the board for any input or motions that you want to offer.

7:14

Motion to approve.

7:20

Oh, this is not a roll call.

7:24

All those in favor of the motion say aye.

7:27

Aye.

7:27

Any opposed?

7:29

Congratulations.

7:30

Thank you.

7:33

All right, Mr.

7:34

Conkey.

7:34

Alright, go through it.

7:36

One more item from our ready business tonight is item number five and six.

7:40

This is the AR 726.

7:52

And the AR236.

8:06

Are you the applicant?

8:07

I'm not okay.

8:09

You have to say it again when you're standing on the blue X.

8:14

Can you give us an address for the record?

8:16

My work address is one thing we find in the record boulevard.

8:21

Thank you.

8:22

Would you like to make a presentation?

8:24

No, just here to answer any questions in the hand.

8:26

Okay, I'll open it up to my colleagues on the board.

8:32

Are there any public speakers on this one, Ms.

8:34

There is?

8:35

Okay, we'll close the public portion of the hearing.

8:38

Would anyone like to make deliberative comments or make a motion?

8:44

I'll motion to approve.

8:48

James had it.

8:50

Is this one uh this one is a roll call?

8:53

This one does require a roll.

8:54

Okay, let's call a roll.

9:00

Okay.

9:01

Uh Mr.

9:03

Aye.

9:04

Mr.

9:04

Spencer?

9:05

Hi.

9:06

Is that here?

9:07

It's on the FR.

9:08

Aye.

9:09

Mr.

9:09

Adams?

9:10

Aye.

9:10

Ms.

9:11

Miller?

9:11

Aye.

9:12

Mr.

9:12

Scott.

9:13

Aye.

9:14

And Ms.

9:14

Nan.

9:15

Aye.

9:16

Congratulations.

9:18

So, Mr.

9:18

Conkey, would you please send the link of today's meeting to the city council?

9:25

So we are supporting the residents of Alan.

9:28

Yes, we are.

9:28

Does anyone have any other matters they'd like to raise?

9:30

Also supporting the I will just I mention this to Mr.

9:34

Conkey.

9:35

Um there is a new restaurant over in Tavern Square, and we had approved some fairly nice large wooden doors there.

9:43

And it appears that they've installed just a regular retail storefront, or it might just not be any door like people was there before.

9:49

So I think city council's gonna take a look at it.

9:53

I guess if they what's the circumstance if they decide not to change the door at all?

9:58

They don't have to change the door.

9:59

Yeah.

10:01

I guess my concern is just that the wooden order they've put around the door doesn't really.

10:08

I I I will put the application sealed.

10:10

So I'd encourage you all to swing by there and take a look.

10:15

It is.

10:15

It's on Hith Street, maybe, and it's where that Indian Kismet place is.

10:22

It's where Pat Toys used to be.

10:24

Also Indian restaurant.

10:27

Fin and fire or something.

10:28

Fin a fire, sorry, fin a fire, yeah.

10:30

Oh, I didn't know.

10:32

And also the city council is looking into the equaron's windows, which don't as well.

10:39

Oh, status we need to not sure they can apply the approval.

10:43

Yep, come on on Washington Street.

10:45

That's on my list.

10:46

Okay, thank you.

10:47

Thank you, everybody.

10:48

And then uh date on we have one more hearing uh in July, July 15th.

10:53

We'll be back here.

10:54

Then we'll be off for August back in September.

10:56

Um in September, I'm gonna take that time to to work on some things.

11:00

Particularly want to work on our building height um presentation that we talked about a little bit, so I'll be trying to get some time maybe in September or October for that time on our uh docking mode, trying to find a uh

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████69%
Historic Preservation████████████████████31%
Summary of Proceedings

Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing - July 6, 2026

Note: The agenda and minutes for this meeting are dated July 2, 2026, but the provided metadata indicates the meeting took place on July 6, 2026. This summary uses the latter date as instructed.

The Board of Architectural Review met on July 6, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers at Del Pepper Community Resource Center. All seven board members were present. The board approved the minutes of the June 17, 2026 meeting, and considered three application items, all of which were approved unanimously.

Consent Calendar

  • BAR2026-00152 – Request for signage and alterations at 400 King Street, Suite 2 (Parcel Address: 480 King Street) for Life Alive Organic Café, represented by Gary Brent. This item was removed from the consent calendar and heard as the first new business item. Board member Miller questioned the centering of the sign; the applicant explained it was centered over the door. The board approved the application as submitted by a vote of 7-0.

Discussion Items

  • BAR2026-00164 – Request for alterations at 312 North Fairfax Street, applicants Margaret and Robert Pasquerella. The board discussed the use of replacement windows vs. full frame replacement. Staff noted that the modern building and distance from the public right-of-way made insert windows appropriate. The board approved the application as submitted by a vote of 7-0.
  • BAR2026-00205 & BAR2026-00206 – Request for alterations and an addition (BAR2026-00205) and partial demolition and encapsulation (BAR2026-00206) at 119 Wolfe Street, applicant Anne Altizer represented by Derek Binsted, Architect. The applicant did not make a presentation. There were no public speakers. The board approved both applications as submitted by a roll call vote of 7-0.

Key Outcomes

  • All three applications were approved unanimously.
  • A board member noted a concern about a new restaurant in Tavern Square that had installed a regular retail storefront instead of the approved large wooden doors, and that the city council was looking into the Equarons windows on Washington Street. The board secretary was asked to send the meeting link to city council.
  • The next public hearing is scheduled for July 15, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

Any guys are this meeting is called to order. We're gonna proceed tonight with applications and other agenda items in the order that they're indicated on the docket. Limited copies of tonight's agenda in each staff report are available uh right over there in the corner on a first come first serve basis. If you are an applicant, please be sure to read the staff report for your case. For each application, we will proceed in the following order of business. The applicant or the applicant's representative may present the proposal or just be available for questions. It's up to you. The public will have an opportunity to speak on each application. Members of the public should fill out a speaker form and hand it over here to Miss Lane if you would like to speak on night. Uh if you're speaking for yourself, you have three minutes, and if you're speaking on behalf of the civic organization, you have five minutes. After public comment is complete, the applicant may respond to public comments, but it's not required to. Um there will then be board deliberation. The board may ask the applicants questions and just engage in a dialogue. After deliberation, the board can take one of several actions. The board can vote on a motion to issue, conditionally issue or deny a certificate of appropriation of appropriateness upon request by an applicant. If the board takes no action at the next regularly scheduled meeting, then the certificate of appropriateness is automatically issued. I will make a couple of comments on voting here. Votes uh motions pass by a simple majority vote. A tie vote results in no action being taken on the motion. And if the board votes to deny an application, a similar application will not be considered for a period of one year following the denial. The board occasionally takes up matters other than applications for certificate of appropriateness, and the public will have an opportunity to comment on those as well. Uh applicants are allowed to appeal any decision by the board to the city council. Applications have to be made within 14 days of the board's decision and in conform uh in conformance with the applicable zoning regulations. So with that said, Mr. Conte, let's get going. Okay. Uh good is yes. Uh consideration of the minutes from the June 17th BAR meeting. Does any member wish to suggest modifications or changes to the June 17th minutes? Does any member of the public have any modifications to suggest to the June 17th minutes? Seeing none, can we have a motion on the minutes? So moved. Second? Second. All those in favor of adopting the minutes from the June 17th meeting say aye. Aye. Any opposed? The minutes are adopted. Okay, on to the consent count. All right, thank you very much. We have one item on the consent panel tonight. Uh VAR 2026-00152. All this poll and it's worth district. Request for signage and operations of 400 K Street speaker two parcel addresses 480k Street. The applicant is like a live organic cafe represented by Gary Marks. All right, does any member of the board wish to remove this item from the consent calendar? Ms. Miller? All right. Just have a question.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com