OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing - July 16, 2026

Public MeetingsThursday, July 16, 2026
BodyAlexandria, Virginia
SessionPublic Meetings
DateThursday, July 16, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:43:53

Transcript — Verbatim
0:09

So that you need to elect a chair pro temp.

0:13

So do I have a nomination for the chair potential?

0:18

Do I have a second for that?

0:19

Second.

0:23

All right.

0:26

Okay.

0:27

Thank you, Mr.

0:27

Tompee.

0:29

Um the first order of business is the meeting.

0:37

Um we have any comments either from the public or our board corrections.

0:46

Do you want to have uh a um moving?

0:53

Okay.

0:58

Okay, I'll be for some minutes as submitted.

1:02

Hi, that brings us to our consent calendars.

1:07

Mr.

1:08

Tompi, would you like to um introduce that?

1:12

Absolutely, yeah, too.

1:13

Uh we have one item on our consent calendar this evening.

1:17

Uh and then the three B AR26-00209, gray request for alteration and labor vision clearance at 1200 postreet, the applicant marked.

1:29

Okay.

1:30

Um, is there any member of the public that would like to remove the sign of the design calendar?

1:40

Is there a member of the board that would like to remove the sign?

1:47

So move second.

1:50

Second.

1:51

Okay, I'll make the expense of 50 cent calendar is submitted.

1:54

Yeah.

1:55

I'm all right.

1:58

Thank you.

1:58

So if you're uh if you were here for item number three, um it's it's concluded.

2:02

Thank you for done.

2:04

I was fine.

2:06

Uh okay, uh now move on to the new business.

2:09

Uh item number two or one.

2:11

This is the R 226, that 0207, all the sort of different operations, 28 Michigan Avenue.

2:24

Great.

2:24

Is the applicants uh somebody representing that to think that's it?

2:29

Okay, sure.

2:30

Come on now.

2:31

Um there's a beautiful blue hex here.

2:35

Um either talk about the staff recommendations or give us a presentation or um I am Daniel Fishman, the property owner in question.

2:53

Um it's uh one three two eight Michigan half.

2:57

I had some roof work done.

2:59

There was broken shingles and holes in the wood, rotted wood, so they replaced um you know all that stuff that needed some repair.

3:08

So it's now synthetic instead of the the slate that was there.

3:21

Staff recommendations.

3:25

I not sure what you're referring to.

3:36

Uh yeah, okay.

3:43

Do you want to um shift the on the moment?

3:48

I prefer to give them a bowl and actually look at that because I'm a stock that I think we can probably take a role in the time.

3:54

And so um please give them some minute to look at oh, we can do this.

4:08

Yeah, so let's move forward to second and we think that there's 78.

4:12

Okay.

4:13

And uh so we're gonna skip ahead and we'll come and we'll come back to you.

4:18

Um here talk about ceilings items seven and eighth.

4:24

Uh this is AR 2026, that 0026, Parker Bray.

4:30

Question operations at 310 North Fayette Street.

4:33

The applicant is heading recipe, represented by Chairman Savel architect and VAR 2026, that's the 0038 for the gray.

4:46

Applicant is well, represented by Jim Ms.

4:51

Okay.

5:00

question operations at three times north faith street the applicant put some credit reason by gentlemen to architect and here we are 26 dash 00 and 358 for the gray question question listen capsulation and three ten north faith street applicant is hi and so well represented by gym as well um can i have to know that yes okay thanks not many hi i'm patty rounceau we live at 310 north fayette street in alexandria and i'm chem labor with marriage pet aroundsville have you read the staff recommendations and if you can discuss that or to produce your project uh answer questions yeah uh we're happy to answer questions um the staff recommendations are fine with us the board let a project please have sorry motion to approve with staff recommendations i was gonna say that's public and i'm sorry oh you didn't do that much this okay i'm just guessing well questions so are there members of the public that want to discuss this um application okay so do only have um a motion for this application yes on motion the very one staff and judgments and this is not a second yes require the whole public this rows aye is middle hips aye sure someone thank you and you can uh reach out to the shelf staff and the word movement is not for the data reading okay thank you great you hosted an AFS student right yes I did a long time ago Luana maybe yes sure okay thank you for you yeah give it a couple minutes um I don't remember five minutes exceeding the whole more minutes I suggest we move on to item number um we're gonna sorry we can we can go ahead and go we can go ahead so um I don't I don't know I don't have a nine and that the question requested it approval and like the thing about finding time for that yeah um so um we would need a motion to approve the request referral 10 so you can motion that second so moved and all in favor of this borough aye we're back to number three more four no four yeah no doubt yes okay well i don't really know where we go from here because the work is done so well we you know we were here to discuss your case you know staff was recommended um a denial um that doesn't necessarily mean that it will be defined okay so we're very excited to talk about it i know that when we've gone by your property and I think there you're discussions so sure so why did I ask the public first is there anyone here to uh discuss this at the patron it's uh we could be an after the fact installation uh sign of some right and you know the work was recommended by the contractors so I kind of just took their judgment um it sounds like since it does connect with another roof that that you know that was raised in here is an issue they can put something to kind of divide I guess or blend I think if they came back and did that um you know and the house across the street did the same thing for me with the synthetic so I didn't think it to be a problem I guess so did you realize you went historically sure yeah I mean thinking that perhaps they're thinking divider between your room and the other three map that is that interesting no I think one of the concerns in here

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Engineering And Infrastructure████████████████████████████████████38%
Procedural███████7%
Community Engagement████4%
Public Engagement██2%
Affordable Housing1%
Summary of Proceedings

Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing - July 16, 2026

The Alexandria Board of Architectural Review (BAR) held a public hearing on July 16, 2026, at the Charles Houston Recreation Center, 901 Wythe Street. The meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. with four members present: Ms. del Ninno (appointed Chair Pro Tem), Ms. Miller, Ms. Robinson, and Mr. Spencer. Chair Scott, Vice Chair Zandian, and Mr. Adams were absent. The board considered several applications for alterations, demolition, and new construction within historic districts, along with a consent calendar and administrative approvals.

Consent Calendar

  • BAR2026-00209 (Parker Gray): Request for alterations and a waiver of vision clearance at 1200 Oronoco Street, applicant Tyler Martin. Approved as submitted (4-0).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Scott Corizon, representing the Old Town Civic Association (OTCA), spoke in full support of items 5 and 6 (BAR2026-00218 & 00219) for new construction and demolition at 333 North Fairfax Street and 300 North Lee Street. He commended the applicant's collaboration with neighbors and significant architectural adjustments, calling the project a model for neighborhood-appropriate development.

Discussion Items

  • BAR2026-00207 (OHAD) – 1328 Michigan Avenue: Applicant Daniel Fishman presented an after-the-fact application for roof replacement using synthetic slate instead of original slate. Staff recommended denial. Board members noted the work was already completed, the synthetic slate blended reasonably with adjacent original slate, and the building is set far from the street. The board voted 3-1 to approve, with Mr. Spencer voting against. Members emphasized that this approval should not set a precedent for future cases.

  • BAR2026-00226 & 00228 (Parker Gray) – 310 North Fayette Street: Request for alterations and partial demolition/encapsulation, applicant Patti Rounsevell. The board approved as amended by staff recommendations on a motion that also opened for public comment; the motion carried 4-0.

  • BAR2026-00218 & 00219 (OHAD) – 333 North Fairfax Street and 300 North Lee Street: This major project for complete demolition and new construction of a 24-home townhouse community was presented by EYA (Jack McLaurin, Jerry Yantis, and team). The design had evolved through three concept hearings. Key discussion points included:

    • Painted vs. natural brick: Debate over whether new construction should be painted brick (as proposed on some units) or left natural. Staff and several board members expressed concern about painting historic brick, while the applicant argued that painted brick is common in Old Town and provides variety. A mineral paint was recommended for breathability. The board ultimately decided to require the applicant to return to a future meeting with the final brick finish for approval.
    • Rear extension designs: Some board members felt the rear bay/extension options appeared poorly integrated with window alignments. The applicant noted that different floor plans (2-bedroom vs 3-bedroom) drove the variations and that many rear windows are recessed 5 feet. The board directed the applicant to work with staff on refining these designs.
    • Building 7 (Queen Street): Several members suggested adding more articulation or a residential character to the flat Italianate facade on this corner building. The applicant preferred the existing flush design as a reference to commercial history and the adjacent Hoffman building. No formal change was required, but the board encouraged further study.
    • Gutters/downspouts: Clarified that downspouts on street-facing units are exterior copper K-style gutters, while on mews-facing units they are piped into bioretention boxes.
    • Historic markers: The applicant proposed two markers: one referencing George Washington’s survey map and the maritime history, and a second (to be determined) possibly related to a Green Factory, subject to archaeological findings.
    • The board also requested coordination of window sill details, consistent use of brick piers, and consideration of reducing the roof overhang on the south elevation.
  • BAR2026-00223 & 00235 (OHAD) – 414 Duke Street: Applicant requested a deferral. Motion to defer carried 4-0.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar: Approved BAR#2026-00209 (4-0).
  • BAR2026-00207 (1328 Michigan Ave): Approved 3-1 with the caveat that this case does not set a precedent. Mr. Spencer voted no.
  • BAR2026-00226 & 00228 (310 N Fayette St): Approved as amended (4-0).
  • BAR2026-00218 & 00219 (333 N Fairfax / 300 N Lee): Motion carried 4-0 to partially approve and partially defer. The approval includes all aspects except the final brick finish (color and texture/painted vs. natural). The applicant must return to a future board meeting for approval of the brick finish. Additionally, the applicant is directed to work with staff on: refining rear extension designs, coordinating cornice and downspout details, exploring a reduced roof overhang with cantilever over doors on building 7, and ensuring consistent window sill detailing.
  • BAR2026-00223 & 00235 (414 Duke St): Deferred (4-0) at applicant’s request.
  • Administrative Approvals: 17 items listed on the docket for various window, door, roof, and stair replacements were noted as approved administratively (no separate vote recorded in the minutes).
  • Adjournment: The hearing adjourned at 8:44 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

So that you need to elect a chair pro temp. So do I have a nomination for the chair potential? Do I have a second for that? Second. All right. Okay. Thank you, Mr. Tompee. Um the first order of business is the meeting. Um we have any comments either from the public or our board corrections. Do you want to have uh a um moving? Okay. Okay, I'll be for some minutes as submitted. Hi, that brings us to our consent calendars. Mr. Tompi, would you like to um introduce that? Absolutely, yeah, too. Uh we have one item on our consent calendar this evening. Uh and then the three B AR26-00209, gray request for alteration and labor vision clearance at 1200 postreet, the applicant marked. Okay. Um, is there any member of the public that would like to remove the sign of the design calendar? Is there a member of the board that would like to remove the sign? So move second. Second. Okay, I'll make the expense of 50 cent calendar is submitted. Yeah. I'm all right. Thank you. So if you're uh if you were here for item number three, um it's it's concluded. Thank you for done. I was fine. Uh okay, uh now move on to the new business. Uh item number two or one. This is the R 226, that 0207, all the sort of different operations, 28 Michigan Avenue. Great. Is the applicants uh somebody representing that to think that's it? Okay, sure. Come on now. Um there's a beautiful blue hex here. Um either talk about the staff recommendations or give us a presentation or um I am Daniel Fishman, the property owner in question. Um it's uh one three two eight Michigan half. I had some roof work done. There was broken shingles and holes in the wood, rotted wood, so they replaced um you know all that stuff that needed some repair. So it's now synthetic instead of the the slate that was there. Staff recommendations. I not sure what you're referring to. Uh yeah, okay. Do you want to um shift the on the moment? I prefer to give them a bowl and actually look at that because I'm a stock that I think we can probably take a role in the time. And so um please give them some minute to look at oh, we can do this.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com