OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Alexandria, Virginia/Public Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Alexandria Planning Commission Public Hearing - October 7, 2026

Public Meetings — Wednesday, October 7, 2026
BodyAlexandria, Virginia
SessionPublic Meetings
DateWednesday, October 7, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:38:36

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:15

Good evening.

0:16

Welcome to the October 6th, 2026 Planning Commission public hearing.

0:20

I guess this is the work session before the public hearing.

Unassigned speaker

0:23

I

Speaker 1

0:24

am Melissa McMahon, chair of the Alexandria Planning Commission.

0:27

We will begin with a work session to discuss proposed changes to parking regulations.

0:31

This is not a public hearing item, and the planning commission will not take any formal action tonight on this matter.

0:37

Director Stoddard, could you get us started off by introducing staff?

Unassigned speaker

0:42

Sure.

Speaker 2

0:43

Happy to introduce staff who are here for the work session.

0:46

Of course, we've got colleagues from both uh test and planning and zoning who are working on this together.

0:51

Um we've got uh uh Katie and Sheila and Sam uh here to present the proposed uh parking text amendment.

0:58

And just I think we're gonna talk about this in the slides, but I it this is as Bears repeating at the beginning that some of this is bringing the local city zoning ordinance into alignment with the state code requirements that were put in place earlier this year.

1:10

Uh and so a lot of this conversation is about what is the new state code requirement.

1:14

Uh how does that align or or not align with the city zoning ordinance?

1:18

And what are we proposing to bring the two uh to bring the local zoning ordinance into alignment?

Speaker 1

1:24

Thank you.

Unassigned speaker

1:25

Go

Speaker 1

1:25

for it.

Speaker 3

1:26

Great, good evening.

1:27

My name is Sheila McCraw.

1:28

I'm the parking and curbside program manager for the city.

1:31

I'm joined by Katie North and Sam Shelby, who we've been working um and Tony has also been working actively on this project.

1:39

Um so as was just mentioned, uh, this past spring, House Bill 888 uh passed, which set new uh minimums

Unassigned speaker

1:50

for

Speaker 3

1:50

residential off-street parking requirements in designated areas and an administrative reduction process for parcels outside of the designated area.

2:00

So we're gonna be discussing tonight what those new requirements are and how we are looking to incorporate those in the city.

2:09

Um a little bit more background, our current city multifamily parking requirements were last updated over 10 years ago in 2015.

2:18

So it's also been a while since we visited this topic.

Unassigned speaker

2:22

Uh

Speaker 3

2:22

we're gonna go through the details of what are in the state requirements and how we're looking to apply those, but essentially we're looking to implement the state requirement citywide, the designated area citywide, um, where current city requirements are uh and then keep city requirements that are lower than the state requirements.

2:42

Um so

Speaker 4

2:43

where we are and what

Speaker 3

2:45

we're looking from you all tonight is we're looking to get some feedback and refining our proposed zoning.

2:51

Well, we're looking on refining our proposed language to meet the state requirements and in getting your feedback.

3:01

Um so we'll go into the specifics of the off-street parking requirements, but um one of the big parts of the bill was these designated areas.

3:14

So on this map that you can see here, the state code applies the new minimums within a half mile of transit facilities.

3:24

Um that's what's all outlined in these gray bubbles.

3:28

So you can see our transit stops and then our metro stations.

3:32

These are all covered in that um in that bill language.

3:37

So you'll see the majority of the city is covered.

3:41

Um we have a couple areas uh you'll see in the light gray that are not covered, but for ease of administration and process, we are recommending to apply the state requirements citywide.

3:55

Um maybe I'll pause for a second here.

3:58

I have a question.

3:59

Sure.

Speaker 1

4:00

How did you define those?

Speaker 3

4:04

Yes.

4:05

So the the exact language from the bill is designated areas, means any parcel located within one half mile of the entrance to a mass transit or public transportation station or facility.

4:18

For the purposes of this definition, mass transit or public transportation station or facility means a building or enhanced structure where members of the general public board or disembark mass transit or public transportation.

4:31

So it's any um obviously our metro stations, but then any bus stop with an enhanced feature, so a shelter, things like that.

4:41

And that's how the language is interpreted, and that's where we get this map.

Speaker 1

4:45

Okay, so those are where it's where it's the bus network.

4:51

These are all of our bus stops with shelters, essentially.

4:58

Cool.

4:58

Okay.

5:00

And if we added a bus stop with a shelter somewhere in the middle of that part, it's not included, it

Unassigned speaker

5:06

would

Speaker 3

5:07

and then it would expand the area.

5:09

Yep.

5:11

Yep.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning And Zoning███████████████████████████████████████████43%
Procedural█████████████████17%
Public Engagement█████████████13%
Parking Management██████████10%
Zoning███3%
Affordable Housing██2%
Transportation Safety██2%
Community Engagement██2%
Environmental Protection██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Alexandria Planning Commission Public Hearing - October 7, 2026

The Alexandria Planning Commission convened a public hearing on October 7, 2026, addressing a work session on parking regulations, a consent calendar with two items removed, a vacation request, a Duke Street land use plan update, two special use permits, and a master plan/zoning text amendment for substandard lots. The commission voted unanimously on all actions.

Work Session: Residential Parking Regulations

The meeting began with a work session on proposed changes to parking regulations to align with state code (House Bill 888). Staff recommended applying the state's new minimum parking requirements citywide, with a proposed 0.5 spaces per dwelling unit for multifamily buildings, and 0.35 for affordable units at or below 60% of area median income, with a maximum of 2 spaces per unit. The commission discussed the rationale and impacts, and will receive the final proposal on November 5.

Consent Calendar

Items #3 (Subdivision #2026-00009) and #4 (Special Use Permit #2026-00035) for 108 and 110 North Quaker Lane were requested to be removed from the consent calendar for individual consideration.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Linda Bennett (adjacent Tupelo Place resident) expressed concerns about potential future access from Tupelo Place and traffic impacts.
  • David Levy (309 East Nelson Ave) opposed the vacation, arguing the city should maintain the alley and preserve parking areas, and disputed claims about trash truck use.
  • Elizabeth Wright raised process questions about the number of dwelling units (six total) and asked about viewer committees for vacations.
  • Monica Perry (Del Ray Citizens Association) supported the 90% test for substandard lots but opposed the block face test, which would remove 56% of lots from SUP review.
  • Two students from St. Stephen's & St. Agnes School spoke in favor of the athletic lighting proposal.
  • Applicant attorneys (M. Catharine Puskar, Duncan Blair) spoke in support of their respective applications.

Discussion Items

  • Items #3 & #4: Subdivision and SUP for 108-110 N. Quaker Lane – Staff recommended approval; the commission approved the subdivision and recommended approval of the SUP for a lot without frontage.
  • Item #5: Vacation of Ramsey Street and East Alexandria Ave – Staff recommended approval of the partial vacation, with a realigned 20-foot alley. The commission approved.
  • Item #6: Duke Street Land Use Plan Update – Staff presented the draft plan, including housing affordability, open space, connectivity, and district concepts. The commission offered suggestions on labeling, shade as critical design, and implementation.
  • Item #7: SUP #2026-00034 for 501 East Howell Ave – Request for a two-unit dwelling on a substandard lot. Staff recommended approval; the commission agreed.
  • Item #8: DSUP #2026-10008 for 1000 St. Stephens Road – Athletic facilities, field lighting (up to 85 feet), and amended condition #66 to allow community use of the auditorium. Staff recommended approval; commission concurred.
  • Item #9: Master Plan and Zoning Text Amendment for Substandard Lots – Staff proposed new regulations allowing by-right development on lots meeting a 90% standard or block face test. The commission initiated and approved both the master plan amendment and zoning text amendment.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to approve Subdivision #2026-00009 – Approved 7-0.
  • Motion to recommend approval of SUP #2026-00035 – Approved 7-0.
  • Motion to recommend approval of Vacation #2026-00001 – Approved 7-0.
  • Motion to initiate and adopt Master Plan Amendment #2026-00002 – Both motions approved 7-0.
  • Motion to initiate and recommend approval of Zoning Text Amendment #2026-00003 – Both motions approved 7-0.
  • Motion to recommend approval of SUP #2026-00034 – Approved 7-0.
  • Motion to recommend approval of DSUP #2026-10008 – Approved 7-0.
  • Minutes deferred to next meeting; meeting adjourned at 10:39 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. Welcome to the October 6th, 2026 Planning Commission public hearing. I guess this is the work session before the public hearing. I am Melissa McMahon, chair of the Alexandria Planning Commission. We will begin with a work session to discuss proposed changes to parking regulations. This is not a public hearing item, and the planning commission will not take any formal action tonight on this matter. Director Stoddard, could you get us started off by introducing staff? Sure. Happy to introduce staff who are here for the work session. Of course, we've got colleagues from both uh test and planning and zoning who are working on this together. Um we've got uh uh Katie and Sheila and Sam uh here to present the proposed uh parking text amendment. And just I think we're gonna talk about this in the slides, but I it this is as Bears repeating at the beginning that some of this is bringing the local city zoning ordinance into alignment with the state code requirements that were put in place earlier this year. Uh and so a lot of this conversation is about what is the new state code requirement. Uh how does that align or or not align with the city zoning ordinance? And what are we proposing to bring the two uh to bring the local zoning ordinance into alignment? Thank you. Go for it. Great, good evening. My name is Sheila McCraw. I'm the parking and curbside program manager for the city. I'm joined by Katie North and Sam Shelby, who we've been working um and Tony has also been working actively on this project. Um so as was just mentioned, uh, this past spring, House Bill 888 uh passed, which set new uh minimums for residential off-street parking requirements in designated areas and an administrative reduction process for parcels outside of the designated area. So we're gonna be discussing tonight what those new requirements are and how we are looking to incorporate those in the city. Um a little bit more background, our current city multifamily parking requirements were last updated over 10 years ago in 2015. So it's also been a while since we visited this topic. Uh we're gonna go through the details of what are in the state requirements and how we're looking to apply those, but essentially we're looking to implement the state requirement citywide, the designated area citywide, um, where current city requirements are uh and then keep city requirements that are lower than the state requirements. Um so where we are and what we're looking from you all tonight is we're looking to get some feedback and refining our proposed zoning. Well, we're looking on refining our proposed language to meet the state requirements and in getting your feedback. Um so we'll go into the specifics of the off-street parking requirements, but um one of the big parts of the bill was these designated areas. So on this map that you can see here, the state code applies the new minimums within a half mile of transit facilities. Um that's what's all outlined in these gray bubbles. So you can see our transit stops and then our metro stations. These are all covered in that um in that bill language. So you'll see the majority of the city is covered. Um we have a couple areas uh you'll see in the light gray that are not covered, but for ease of administration and process, we are recommending to apply the state requirements citywide. Um maybe I'll pause for a second here. I have a question. Sure. How did you define those? Yes. So the the exact language from the bill is designated areas, means any parcel located within one half mile of the entrance to a mass transit or public transportation station or facility. For the purposes of this definition, mass transit or public transportation station or facility means a building or enhanced structure where members of the general public board or disembark mass transit or public transportation. So it's any um obviously our metro stations, but then any bus stop with an enhanced feature, so a shelter, things like that.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com