Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Board of Architectural Review (BAR) held a public hearing on certificates of appropriateness, one withdrawal, waterfront flood-mitigation improvements, and a proposed zoning text amendment briefing. The agenda and minutes date the meeting as Wednesday, October 7, 2026, but the supplied metadata date is October 8, 2026; this summary uses the supplied date. The agenda lists the venue as Charles Houston Recreation Center, 901 Wythe Street, while the minutes header lists Del Pepper Community Resource Center, 4850 Mark Center Drive. The hearing was called to order at 7:00 p.m. and adjourned at 10:31 p.m.
Yes. Yes. Okay. This meeting is called to order. We will proceed tonight with the uh applications and other agenda items in the order indicated on the docket. We don't have any copies of the docket anymore, do we? We do have a copy. Do we have to say the docket? We're moving to a paper-free system. So it's always better to look at the city's website in advance and print it out if you want to dock it. If you want to know this sitting around on the room, you can Google it too. Great. If you're an applicant, please be sure to read the staff report for your case. If you don't have it, you can scan it there and download it. We're gonna proceed in the following order of business. The applicant or applicant's representative may present the proposal or just be available for questions. And the board encourages everybody to be thorough but concise. The public will have an opportunity to speak on each application. Members of the public will be given three minutes. And if you're representing a civic organization, you'll have five minutes. So just make sure you fill out a speaker form and hand it in to Ms. Weiss Gerber in advance. After public comment is complete, the board will give the applicant an opportunity to respond to any public comments. Following this, we'll close the public hearing aspect and we will enter into deliberations where we'll have discussions with the applicant. After deliberation, the board may take the following actions for each application. We can vote on a motion to issue, continually issue, or deny a certificate of appropriation on request from an applicant. We can vote on a motion to defer. We can vote to continue the next case to the next available public hearing, or we can uh proceed to the next docket item without taking any action. If the board takes no action at the next regularly scheduled meeting, the certificate of appropriateness is automatically issued. A couple of comments on voting. Motions passed by a simple majority vote. A tie vote results in no action on the motion. It doesn't mean that the application fails, it means the motion fails. If the board votes to deny an application, a similar application will not be considered for a period of one year. The board occasionally takes up matters uh um other than applications for certificates of appropriateness. We are doing that tonight, and we'll give the public an opportunity to speak on those matters as well. Same deal, you'll just have to fill out a speaker form. Any appeals to the board will um from the board can go to the city council. And if you'd like to appeal any board decision, you just have to make the appeal with the city within 14 days, and that's what the zoning ordinance says. So uh with all of that, Mr. Conki, are we moving on to the minutes? All right. Um so the first thing we have to consider are the minutes um from the September 16th Board of Architectural Reviewed Public Hearing. Does anyone on the board have any comments or suggested amendments to the minutes from the September 16th hearing? Do any members of the public wish to suggest any amendments to the minutes from the September 16th hearing?