OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Alexandria, Virginia/Public Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing - October 22, 2026

Public Meetings — Thursday, October 22, 2026
BodyAlexandria, Virginia
SessionPublic Meetings
DateThursday, October 22, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:01:38

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:06

We will proceed tonight with applications and other agenda items in the order indicated on the docket.

0:11

Limited copies of tonight's agenda are available um right over here in the hall on a first conversor basis.

0:17

And there's I believe there's a QR code.

0:20

If you want to link to it and download the actual each item um onto the device.

0:26

There's also free Wi-Fi in the building.

0:27

I just found

Unassigned speaker

0:28

that.

Speaker 1

0:28

If you're an applicant, be sure to read the staff report report for your case for each application.

0:35

We will proceed in the follow-up or following order of business.

0:38

The applicant or the applicant's representative may present the proposal or be available for questions.

0:44

The public will have an opportunity to speak on each application.

0:47

Members of the public interested in speaking need to fill out a speaker form in advance and get them to any staff member from Mr.

0:54

Harris over here to receive them.

0:55

Members of the public can be given three minutes to speak, and those representing community organizations will have five minutes.

1:02

After public comments complete, the applicant may respond to any of the public comments, and then the board will close public comment and begin deliberation.

1:10

That's going to look like a conversation among the board and between the board and the applicant.

1:15

After deliberation, the board can take the following actions.

1:18

It can vote on a motion to issue conditionally issue or deny a certificate of appropriateness.

1:25

Upon request by an applicant, vote on a motion to defer taking action, vote to continue the case to the next available hearing, or proceed to the next item without taking action.

1:35

If the board takes no action at the next regularly scheduled meeting, the certificate of appropriateness is automatically issued.

1:42

Just want to make a few comments about voting.

1:45

Motions pass by simple majority vote.

1:47

A tie vote results in the motion uh failing, uh not the document item failing.

1:54

It just means the motion is failed.

1:56

If the board votes to deny publication, a similar application will not be considered for a period of one year following the denial.

2:03

The board occasionally takes the matters other than certificates of appropriateness, which we will tonight.

2:08

We will give the public an opportunity to speak on those matters.

2:11

Any decisions of the board, any votes by the board can be appealed to the city council, and they need to be filed within 14 days of the board's decision in accordance with the zoning ordinance.

2:22

So that is my introduction.

2:25

What do we get going?

2:26

I think the first thing is consideration of the minutes from the October 7th public hearing.

2:33

Does anyone have any suggested modifications to the minutes from the October 7th public hearing?

Speaker 2

2:40

I do.

Speaker 1

2:41

Okay.

Speaker 2

2:42

Okay.

Speaker 3

2:43

Um, um

Unassigned speaker

2:58

I don't

Speaker 3

2:59

think I can have

Speaker 4

3:00

a copy of it, so I'm just happy to just uh I direct to it.

3:04

Um, one of my um one thing that I said and it said that I um spoke of the AKA hotel.

3:13

But I think that hotel is called the Scarf block.

Unassigned speaker

3:17

The

Speaker 4

3:17

SATA.

Speaker 5

3:20

Oh, it was that was a good so it was previously made in the AKA.

3:23

Um, currently it's been changed recently to the session.

3:26

So depending upon the context, you could have been saying the it could be correct based on the previous name, but uh, AK.

Speaker 4

3:36

Okay,

Speaker 5

3:37

we can look at because the whole phone and look at we'll just make sure that

Speaker 1

3:40

we correct the record to reflect the correct name or just the address of the building.

Speaker 5

3:44

Yeah, okay.

3:45

Yeah, it just depends upon what you were.

3:46

If you were referring to it as a previous name, you could take a look at the correct if you're uh referring to it in the present tense, then it would be the seven.

3:56

Okay, we'll

Speaker 1

3:57

figure it

Unassigned speaker

3:57

out.

Speaker 1

3:57

Okay, are there any other suggested modifications to the minutes?

Unassigned speaker

4:03

All

Speaker 1

4:04

right, is there any public comment on the minutes from the October 7th meeting?

4:09

Seeing none, we will close public comment.

4:11

And can we have a motion on the minutes from October 7th?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning And Zoning█████████████████████████████████████████████49%
Historic Preservation█████████████████18%
Signage Regulations██████████████15%
Public Engagement██████6%
Procedural█████5%
Lighting Regulations██2%
Parks and Recreation██2%
Technology and Innovation█1%
Engineering And Infrastructure█1%
Summary of Proceedings

City of Alexandria Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing

Date: October 22, 2026 (Note: The agenda and minutes list the meeting date as October 21, 2026; the provided metadata indicates October 22, 2026. The agenda lists the location as Charles Houston Recreation Center (901 Wythe Street), while the minutes list the City Council Chambers at Del Pepper Community Resource Center (4850 Mark Center Drive).)

The Board of Architectural Review met to consider two certificate of appropriateness applications and updates to eleven chapters of the Design Guidelines for the Parker-Gray and Old and Historic Alexandria Districts. Present were Chair Scott, Ms. Miller, Ms. Robinson, Ms. del Ninno, and Mr. Adams. Vice Chair Zandian and Mr. Spencer were absent. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM and adjourned at 9:02 PM.

Approval of Minutes

  • The Board approved the minutes of the October 7, 2026 public hearing as amended (motion by Ms. del Ninno, seconded by Ms. Miller; vote 5-0). A correction was made to reference the correct name of a hotel.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Christine Roberts (private citizen) asked about the cornice material for the townhome project (Items 4&5) and urged use of high-quality materials.
  • Christine Roberts (Historic Alexandria Foundation) made six preservation-focused recommendations during the design guidelines discussion, including stronger protections for early buildings, more rigorous visibility and reversibility standards, and better applicant documentation.
  • Amanda Callahan (Old Town Civic Association) provided detailed comments on individual chapters of the proposed design guidelines, including requests to clarify definitions, update photographs, reduce the security camera size threshold from 1 cubic foot to 0.5 cubic foot, and cite specific code references. She asked the Board to defer adoption for further public input.
  • Scott (representing an unspecified organization) offered minor suggestions on clarifying jurisdiction, updating photographs, and explaining differences in screening requirements between districts.

Discussion Items

Item 3: BAR2026-00380 – Gorjana, 726 King Street

The applicant, represented by Katie Gray, proposed interior and exterior alterations and illuminated signage. Staff recommended approval for the storefront work but denial of the internally illuminated canopy sign, blade sign, and backlit graphic. The Board discussed alternative lighting (halo-lit letters, external gooseneck lighting, uplighting) and approved the project with options: either halo-lit letters within the canopy or larger externally lit letters, plus external illumination for the blade sign. The motion carried 5-0.

Items 4 & 5: BAR2026-00354 and BAR2026-00355 – Steeple Home Company Townhomes, 724-728 N. Patrick Street

Architect Stephen Kulinski presented a warehouse-inspired design for five townhomes. The design included reduced parapet height, recessed entrances, setback to widen sidewalks, and detailed brickwork. Board members praised the improvements. Concerns were raised about the brick color and the PVC cornice material. The Board approved the projects with staff to finalize the cornice material. Motion by Ms. Miller, seconded by Ms. Robinson; vote 5-0.

Item 6 – Updates to Design Guidelines

Staff presented proposed updates to 11 chapters covering utility meters, mechanical equipment, exterior lighting, security features, planters, and others. The design guidelines committee had discussed the chapters in May, June, and July; a community meeting was held August 19. After public testimony, the Board discussed each chapter.

Key discussion points:

  • Roof Decks and Railings: The Board agreed to add guidelines requiring minimally visible railings, require all rooftop railings to undergo Board review (removing administrative approval for cable and glass), and emphasize minimal disruption of historic materials. These changes will be drafted for a future vote.
  • Security Features: The Board agreed to reduce the administrative approval threshold for cameras from 1 cubic foot to 0.5 cubic foot and to replace an inappropriate floodlight photo.
  • Planters: The Board decided to strike a guideline stating permanent planters are inappropriate on early buildings, improve photographs, and add definitions of street-facing.
  • Exterior Lighting, Porches+Porticos, Security Features, Planters, Infrastructure in the Public Right-of-Way, Small Cell Facilities+Antennas: Approved with modifications including adding definitions and better photos.
  • Deferred Chapters: The Board deferred five chapters to a future public hearing: Utility Meters+Electric Vehicle Chargers, Mechanical Equipment+HVAC+Vents, Accessory Structures, Building Accessories, and Decks/Roof Decks/Balconies for further refinement, especially on roof deck and railing guidelines.

Key Outcomes

  • Minutes from October 7, 2026: Approved as amended (5-0).
  • BAR2026-00380 (Gorjana): Approved with modified signage (5-0).
  • BAR2026-00354 & 00355 (Steeple Home Townhomes): Approved with staff to finalize cornice material (5-0).
  • Design Guidelines (six chapters): Approved – Exterior Lighting, Porches+Porticos, Security Features, Planters, Infrastructure in the Public Right-of-Way, and Small Cell Facilities+Antennas (5-0).
  • Design Guidelines (five chapters deferred): Utility Meters+Electric Vehicle Chargers, Mechanical Equipment+HVAC+Vents, Accessory Structures, Building Accessories, and Decks, Roof Decks+Balconies deferred to future hearing.
  • Directives: Staff will incorporate board feedback on roof decks/railings, security camera size, planter photos, and definitions, and prepare revised drafts for the deferred chapters.

Meeting Transcript

We will proceed tonight with applications and other agenda items in the order indicated on the docket. Limited copies of tonight's agenda are available um right over here in the hall on a first conversor basis. And there's I believe there's a QR code. If you want to link to it and download the actual each item um onto the device. There's also free Wi-Fi in the building. I just found that. If you're an applicant, be sure to read the staff report report for your case for each application. We will proceed in the follow-up or following order of business. The applicant or the applicant's representative may present the proposal or be available for questions. The public will have an opportunity to speak on each application. Members of the public interested in speaking need to fill out a speaker form in advance and get them to any staff member from Mr. Harris over here to receive them. Members of the public can be given three minutes to speak, and those representing community organizations will have five minutes. After public comments complete, the applicant may respond to any of the public comments, and then the board will close public comment and begin deliberation. That's going to look like a conversation among the board and between the board and the applicant. After deliberation, the board can take the following actions. It can vote on a motion to issue conditionally issue or deny a certificate of appropriateness. Upon request by an applicant, vote on a motion to defer taking action, vote to continue the case to the next available hearing, or proceed to the next item without taking action. If the board takes no action at the next regularly scheduled meeting, the certificate of appropriateness is automatically issued. Just want to make a few comments about voting. Motions pass by simple majority vote. A tie vote results in the motion uh failing, uh not the document item failing. It just means the motion is failed. If the board votes to deny publication, a similar application will not be considered for a period of one year following the denial. The board occasionally takes the matters other than certificates of appropriateness, which we will tonight. We will give the public an opportunity to speak on those matters. Any decisions of the board, any votes by the board can be appealed to the city council, and they need to be filed within 14 days of the board's decision in accordance with the zoning ordinance. So that is my introduction. What do we get going? I think the first thing is consideration of the minutes from the October 7th public hearing. Does anyone have any suggested modifications to the minutes from the October 7th public hearing? I do. Okay. Okay. Um, um I don't think I can have a copy of it, so I'm just happy to just uh I direct to it. Um, one of my um one thing that I said and it said that I um spoke of the AKA hotel. But I think that hotel is called the Scarf block. The SATA. Oh, it was that was a good so it was previously made in the AKA. Um, currently it's been changed recently to the session. So depending upon the context, you could have been saying the it could be correct based on the previous name, but uh, AK. Okay, we can look at because the whole phone and look at we'll just make sure that we correct the record to reflect the correct name or just the address of the building. Yeah, okay.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com