OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Allentown Zoning Hearing Board Meeting Jan 7, 2026

Meeting PortalWednesday, January 7, 2026
BodyAllentown, Pennsylvania
SessionMeeting Portal
DateWednesday, January 7, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:34:56
Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

Tonight the board consists of Trent Sears to my immediate left and then Joe Peterson to my far left and I'm Samantha McLean.

0:08

Um tonight uh there are three items on the agenda, but my understanding, Mike, is that item number two, 807 North La Cross Street will be postponed to another agenda.

0:19

Yes, that's correct.

0:20

The applicant has requested a date certain of January 26th, and we can we're able to honor that request.

0:27

It's also worth noting on the agenda for for the ad that was provided for the Ridge Avenue property, the 406408 Ridge Avenue property.

0:37

There was a clerical error in the morning call notice that ran and that would have been posted.

0:42

It indicated that the use was permitted by special exception.

0:46

The use is a by-right use in this particular matter.

0:49

So there's no there's no special exception to be considered.

0:53

It's staff's belief that the note or that the error was was clerical alone and that the ad still would have provided sufficient notice of the matter at hand.

1:03

Thanks, Mike.

1:04

Um so with the two items that remain on the agenda, the secretary is going to call each item.

1:10

Um when she does, she'll ask if an applicant or appellant is present and if they're represented by counsel, and then if there are any objectors.

1:18

If you are an objector for an item, if you could just raise your hand so we're aware.

1:22

Um, and then she'll ask if there are any persons interested that are not necessarily objectors to the item, and at that point we ask that you raise your hand.

1:32

Case number one, special use application of physniki at 406 408 Ridge Avenue.

1:41

Is the appellant present?

1:42

Uh yes, represented by Eric Shaw.

1:45

The appellant is present.

1:46

Are there any objectors to case number one?

1:48

Yes, the city objects.

1:51

Are there any interested parties not necessarily objectors to case number one?

1:57

No.

1:58

Case number two, 807 North Lacrosse has been continued.

2:03

If anybody is here for that case.

2:13

Yes.

2:14

The appellant is present.

2:16

Are there any objectors to case number three?

2:20

No.

2:20

Are there any interested parties not necessarily objectors to case number three?

2:25

Yes.

2:28

Okay, thank you.

2:30

Um, so we will go with the the first item on the agenda 406 408 Ridge Avenue.

2:51

Um I have two witnesses, but what what I thought might make the most sense since the zoning officer and I have had some discourse back and forth as to the concern.

3:02

If it makes sense, I would just call him to so that he could raise his concern because then my the architect can address and the applicant can address what I understood to be the city's concern uh that caused them to be an objector, but I don't think objecting to the to not objecting to what we're looking for, but raising concerns that they'd like addressed in my presentation.

3:28

All right.

3:28

That that seems reasonable to me.

3:30

Any more concerns?

3:31

Go ahead.

3:32

Okay, so I'll I'll call the zoning officer, Mr.

3:34

Hanzo.

3:36

We have discussed um uh items that I'm oh sure, sorry, yeah.

3:41

Yeah, sure.

3:42

Mike Hanzo, zoning supervisor for the city of Allentown.

3:47

And yes, oh that's right, sorry.

3:51

I trust him so much.

3:52

I wasn't gonna trust his first year and that meeting just yes, I do.

3:58

And I have a couple exhibit packets to present.

4:01

So I have four sets here for we can just pass those down.

4:08

And Eric, I have a set for you as well.

4:13

So while the while the city is entering its appearance as an objector, I suppose a very strongly interested party with a very particular interest is probably a fair term to define the city's interest in this particular matter.

4:27

I'd like to make it very clear on the record up front that the city has no particular objection to the request itself or to or to the use per se any more than any other kind of proposal of this nature.

4:41

However, there are a couple a couple concerns or a couple code-specific concerns with this property that the the city believes the board should take carefully under advisement and that the city uh hopes the applicant does a diligent job of testifying to in their comments.

5:00

Exhibit C1, which I provided is a copy of a pre-sale inspection report for this property.

5:06

It's standard protocol.

5:08

Anytime a residential property in the city is offered up for sale for an inspector from the city's building standards rental inspection program to perform a systematic walkthrough with an eye toward identifying life safety and code issues.

5:24

The city enforces the international property maintenance code.

5:27

This is one of the primary mechanisms of enforcement in the city to ensure that all dwellings offered in the city are in some baseline safe and decent condition.

5:38

Before the current owner purchased this property, it was owned by a property owner where if you spoke to the rental inspectors would have been would have been known to keep properties in a condition that wouldn't have been compliant with the international property maintenance code.

5:53

There's a considerable list of code deficiencies identified in the in the pre-sale walkthrough.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Regulations█████████████████████████████████████████████83%
Public Safety███5%
Procedural██3%
Engineering And Infrastructure██3%
Parking Management██3%
Affordable Housing2%
Community Engagement1%
Summary of Proceedings

Allentown Zoning Hearing Board Meeting Jan 7, 2026

The Allentown Zoning Hearing Board convened on January 7, 2026, to address items including a special use application for a residential conversion at 406-408 Ridge Avenue and a variance request for a live-work unit at 1343 Linden Street. Item regarding 807 North LaCrosse Street was continued to January 26, 2026, at the applicant's request. The City of Allentown entered appearance as an objector to the Ridge Avenue proposal primarily due to code-specific building safety and egress concerns, while the applicants demonstrated good faith efforts to resolve deficiencies. Board members expressed support for the proposals, emphasizing the need for housing and the unique constraints of the properties.

Consent Calendar

  • [None listed; all items were active discussion and vote items.]

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Bradley Cartre (Neighbor): Expressed full support for the 1343 Linden Street application. The speaker stated that the property is a beneficial addition to the neighborhood and highlighted the area's walkability, proximity to public transit, grocery stores, and community resources like churches and schools. The speaker noted that existing tenants in the immediate vicinity rarely drive, suggesting low impact on parking.

Discussion Items

  • 406-408 Ridge Avenue (Special Use Application):

    • City Position (Zoning Officer Mike Hanzo): The city is not diametrically opposed to the conversion to four residential units but raised significant concerns regarding building code compliance, specifically the lack of two safe means of egress for the new first-floor units. The officer highlighted that the property is landlocked, making rear egress across private property a legal and physical hurdle. Additionally, a pre-sale inspection revealed code deficiencies, and a stop-work order had been issued by the building department for unpermitted work by the previous owner. The speaker emphasized that the current owner, Mr. Karametti, is acting in good faith to rectify these issues.
    • Applicant Position (Mr. Karametti): The owner stated his intention to bring the property into full compliance with current codes, noting he had hired an architect and demolition permits were already filed. He explained his decision to pursue two apartments instead of commercial use based on realtor advice regarding marketability in the area. The speaker expressed that the first floor was previously a dental office with unpermitted modifications and that the goal is to legitimize the four-unit configuration.
    • Architect Position (Stuart Galk, Galk Architects): The architect testified that the proposed use is feasible. Regarding egress, the speaker explained that the International Building Code allows for a single means of egress if the building is fully sprinklered, citing a recent project on Front Street that utilized this provision. The speaker argued that while the lot is landlocked, the lack of off-street parking is an existing non-conformity carried over from the previous dental office use, which required fewer spaces than a dental office would have needed. The speaker also noted that converting the space to a single large unit is less feasible due to market demand for smaller units and the building's internal configuration.
    • City Concerns on Parking: While the applicant argued that parking relief is unnecessary due to prior commercial non-conformity, the city noted that zoning review letters had previously identified a parking deficiency. The architect countered that the previous dental office use would have required significantly more parking (approx. 9 spaces) than the proposed two apartments (approx. 3 spaces), suggesting the current parking situation is a reasonable non-conformity to maintain.
  • 1343 Linden Street (Variance for Live-Work Unit):

    • Applicant Position (Jeff and Kelly Holzman): The owners requested a variance to convert an existing office space into a live-work unit. They stated that commercial office space in the area has been difficult to rent, whereas residential units are in high demand. The speaker noted the property has existing residential apartments on the upper floors and that the proposed space already contains a full bathroom and kitchenette, requiring only minor interior finishing. The speaker indicated the intended use would be for a tailor or similar artist/service professional, which fits the live-work definition.
    • Board Clarification: Board members clarified that the live-work unit must adhere to specific permissible uses (retail, personal services, artistic studios) compatible with the underlying residential zoning, and that a subsequent city business license would verify the specific tenant's business type.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion Made and Passed: Approved the special use application for 406-408 Ridge Avenue, granting the requested zoning relief for the two additional first-floor units.
    • Condition 1: The applicant must ensure the entire building is equipped with an automatic sprinkler system OR obtain an engineered solution for fire egress acceptable to the City Building Code Official.
    • Condition 2: All bedroom windows must be approved egress windows suitable for fire escape, compliant with the current or 2018 building code (whichever applies to the design contract).
  • Motion Made and Passed: Approved the variance for 1343 Linden Street to create one first-floor live-work unit.
    • Condition 1: The future tenant must comply with all Article 15 requirements for live-work units, specifically regarding permissible uses.
    • Condition 2: The tenant must obtain and maintain a valid City Business License, with zoning review to confirm the business type aligns with the live-work regulations and the underlying zone.
  • Item Continued: The application for 807 North LaCrosse Street was continued to January 26, 2026. A clerical error in the original public notice regarding the 406-408 Ridge Avenue property (indicating a special exception rather than a by-right use) was acknowledged by staff as a non-substantive error that did not affect the sufficiency of notice.

Meeting Transcript

Tonight the board consists of Trent Sears to my immediate left and then Joe Peterson to my far left and I'm Samantha McLean. Um tonight uh there are three items on the agenda, but my understanding, Mike, is that item number two, 807 North La Cross Street will be postponed to another agenda. Yes, that's correct. The applicant has requested a date certain of January 26th, and we can we're able to honor that request. It's also worth noting on the agenda for for the ad that was provided for the Ridge Avenue property, the 406408 Ridge Avenue property. There was a clerical error in the morning call notice that ran and that would have been posted. It indicated that the use was permitted by special exception. The use is a by-right use in this particular matter. So there's no there's no special exception to be considered. It's staff's belief that the note or that the error was was clerical alone and that the ad still would have provided sufficient notice of the matter at hand. Thanks, Mike. Um so with the two items that remain on the agenda, the secretary is going to call each item. Um when she does, she'll ask if an applicant or appellant is present and if they're represented by counsel, and then if there are any objectors. If you are an objector for an item, if you could just raise your hand so we're aware. Um, and then she'll ask if there are any persons interested that are not necessarily objectors to the item, and at that point we ask that you raise your hand. Case number one, special use application of physniki at 406 408 Ridge Avenue. Is the appellant present? Uh yes, represented by Eric Shaw. The appellant is present. Are there any objectors to case number one? Yes, the city objects. Are there any interested parties not necessarily objectors to case number one? No. Case number two, 807 North Lacrosse has been continued. If anybody is here for that case. Yes. The appellant is present. Are there any objectors to case number three? No. Are there any interested parties not necessarily objectors to case number three? Yes. Okay, thank you. Um, so we will go with the the first item on the agenda 406 408 Ridge Avenue. Um I have two witnesses, but what what I thought might make the most sense since the zoning officer and I have had some discourse back and forth as to the concern. If it makes sense, I would just call him to so that he could raise his concern because then my the architect can address and the applicant can address what I understood to be the city's concern uh that caused them to be an objector, but I don't think objecting to the to not objecting to what we're looking for, but raising concerns that they'd like addressed in my presentation. All right. That that seems reasonable to me. Any more concerns? Go ahead. Okay, so I'll I'll call the zoning officer, Mr. Hanzo. We have discussed um uh items that I'm oh sure, sorry, yeah. Yeah, sure. Mike Hanzo, zoning supervisor for the city of Allentown. And yes, oh that's right, sorry. I trust him so much. I wasn't gonna trust his first year and that meeting just yes, I do. And I have a couple exhibit packets to present. So I have four sets here for we can just pass those down. And Eric, I have a set for you as well.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com