Allentown Historical Architectural Review Board Meeting - March 6, 2026
Allentown Historical Architectural Review Board Meeting - March 6, 2026
The Allentown Historical Architectural Review Board (HARB) met on March 6, 2026, to review a door replacement application, provide comments on two demolition proposals under the Historic Building Demolition Control Overlay District, and discuss other business. The meeting was chaired by AJ Me with members David Hewart, Philip Hart, Alex Scholasweek, Rob Hammond, and Patty Shire present, along with consultant Amy Vay.
Consent Calendar
- The minutes from the February 2, 2026 meeting were approved unanimously.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Tom from the West Park Civic Association expressed support for the door replacement at 1515 Linden Street as proposed.
Discussion Items
- 1515 Linden Street (West Park Fan Shell Building): Staff presented a proposal to replace five single doors with four mahogany doors and one metal door, replicating original designs. Staff recommended approval with the condition that the original doors be salvaged. The applicant confirmed the doors would be salvaged and restored. The board approved the application with that condition.
- 112-114 North Eighth Street: Staff reviewed the proposed demolition of three structures (two attached two-story buildings and a rear garage) to allow construction of a seven-story, 23-unit apartment building. HARB's role is to comment on the historical and architectural significance of the existing buildings. Members discussed the historical value of the structures, particularly the rear garage on North Rough Wall Street. Member Rob Hammond raised concerns about the contractor's past compliance record, but the applicant (Alex Wright) disputed those claims. The board agreed to add comments emphasizing that the three structures are consistent in form and setback, and that neighboring historically significant buildings (110 and 116 North Eighth Street) must be protected during demolition. The board also recommended that demolition should not proceed until all permits for the new construction are secured.
- 138-142 North Ninth Street: Staff reviewed the proposed demolition of three attached three-story structures (one with Queen Anne/Second Empire influences, two with Eastlake influences) to allow a six-story, 40-unit mixed-use building with retail. Staff noted the buildings' high degree of integrity with original features. Board members expressed strong opposition to the demolition, citing the loss of brownstone, wood cornices, and other original details. Members noted that previous losses on the block make these structures more significant, and that the view from the adjacent Old Allentown Historic District's cemetery makes the rear facade important. The board added comments about the structures' historical significance and the visual impact on the surrounding historic district. The applicant indicated willingness to incorporate historical elements into the new design.
- Other Business:
- CLG Grant: Staff reported a $25,000 grant application to digitize historic records, with support from the board.
- Design Guidelines Update: The board will begin reviewing the historic design guidelines chapter by chapter, starting with Chapter 1.
- 428 North Sixth Street: The applicant (non-profit) faced budget cuts and proposed material changes (e.g., replacing brick with siding on sides/rear). The board advised that the project must be brought back for a new approval if the changes are significant; they did not prescribe specific changes.
- Violations Update: Staff reported ongoing enforcement at 248 North Ninth Street, including attempts to serve an alternate address after the owner failed to appear in court.
Key Outcomes
- 1515 Linden Street: Approved with the condition that original doors be salvaged.
- 112-114 North Eighth Street: HARB will forward comments to the Zoning Hearing Board stating that the three structures are historically significant, and that demolition should not occur until all permits for the new building are secured and neighboring structures are protected.
- 138-142 North Ninth Street: HARB will forward comments emphasizing the high historical integrity of the buildings, the negative impact of their loss on the streetscape, and the importance of the rear facade given its visibility from the Old Allentown Historic District.
- Other: The CLG grant application was noted; design guidelines review will proceed; the applicant for 428 North Sixth Street is to submit a new application for revised materials; enforcement efforts at 248 North Ninth Street continue.
Meeting Transcript
Council City Council renders the final decision of HARB recommendations. Under the direction of the historic design guidelines, HARB review covers the general design, arrangement, texture, material, and color of a building or will also examine how these factors relate to similar features around your building. Anyone in attendance wishing to comment on any of the listed items on tonight's agenda are required to sign in for records purposes. Okay. Staff will introduce and present the proposal through a prepared report, which was provided to the applicant and board members for review prior to the evening's meeting. The applicant could then provide additional context to their proposal before discussion. Presentations are limited to 30 minutes and comments from any interested party other than the applicant are limited to five minutes. After the presentation, the board will discuss the merits of the project among themselves, but will ask the applicant and staff for relevant information to supplement the discussion. After the deliberation, HARB will recommend to approve as submitted or approve with conditions, deny with explanation, or table the project for further discussion. If the applicant is not present at the meeting, or if information provided is not sufficient, the board may table the project until the next meeting to provide the opportunity for the applicant to present and or supply sufficient information for discussion. Proposal will only be tabled once. If requirements are not satisfied at the following meeting, the board may automatically recommend for denial and require the applicant to reapply for a new certificate of appropriateness. HARB recommendations will then be forwarded to the next uh available city council meeting for final resolution. Meanwhile, no work can proceed until a council resolution and certificate of appropriateness is received. Once received, you will then be able to pull any additional permit associated with your project. All right, let's go on to roll. Oh, yes, yes, I was, but I have to run our call. Good evening. March 2nd, 2026. Chair AJ Me here. Mike Chair, David Hewart here. Remember Philip Hart? Here. Remember Alex in Scholasweek? Remember Rob Hammond? Here. Member Patty Shire. Here. Let the record reflect that the quorum is present. Also present this evening is our consultant Amy Vay from LG Partners. That concludes memorable call. All right. Thank you. Moving on to minutes from February 2nd, 2026 meeting. Does everyone had a chance to review the minutes? Any comments, corrections, edits. All right. Is there a motion to approve? So moved. And is there a second? I'll second. Great. Those in favor of approval of minutes. Aye. None opposed. Great. Then we can move right into new business. So do we have a representative for 1515 Linden Street? Present. Great.
openpublica.com