OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Allentown Planning Commission Monthly Meeting - July 14, 2026

Meeting PortalTuesday, July 14, 2026
BodyAllentown, Pennsylvania
SessionMeeting Portal
DateTuesday, July 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:02:46

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

All right, right.

0:04

Okay, everybody, I'm gonna call this meeting of the City of Allentown Planning Commission to order.

0:08

Thank you for joining us.

0:11

Um approval of the meeting minutes from the June 9th meeting.

0:20

We've been prepared and circulated.

0:22

Does anybody have any comments, corrections, or additions?

0:26

Okay, hearing none, those will stand approved as written.

0:29

Uh next we have a couple pardon me.

0:35

Sorry.

0:36

We had a uh uh public meeting comment card submitted by Bonnie McMahon on item number one, which was the minutes in the I'm sorry, I didn't I was wanted to talk about the data center.

0:48

Okay.

0:49

So I had the we just wanted to clarify.

0:51

Thank you.

0:52

We'll call you then.

0:54

Yeah.

0:56

No, that's okay, thank you.

0:57

Um so then we have two administrative matters today, the first being a couple policies and procedures.

1:05

Uh one having to do with public comment policy.

1:11

Um the planning commission had not previously had any sort of formally adopted um policy, and I think one has been prepared that largely mimics or mirrors the city council and um general uh intent of the city charter.

1:29

So um that's been prepared and circulated for us, and I know we had the opportunity to reply individually back to staff.

1:39

Um so I assume that the version that's been included in our packet is the final version, and does anybody have any further comments or discussion about it?

1:51

Okay, um I suppose we should make uh we should take a motion to go ahead and formally adopting public comment probably to get public comment on the public comment policy um but uh but also I think because it's on the agenda once, um if you could talk about the second policy related to tabling, which a very short explanation of the tabling policy is simply that um to grant the tabling request if they're submitted in advance of 26 hours before the meeting, so we can amend the agenda and then if it's submitted afterwards, then make the applicant come to the meeting and and request it themselves.

2:26

Right.

2:28

Yeah, we were just talking about that, and I think we we've we've talked about that in the past.

2:32

I guess this is just the formal adoption of a policy.

2:36

So is there any comment on that one?

2:41

All right, so we have two two administrative matters.

2:43

Is there anybody in the public interested in questions or comments relative to our public comment policy or our policy regarding the voluntary tabling of a project on behalf of the client or the applicant, I should say?

3:02

Okay, we're hearing none.

3:04

So then I guess we'll take these individually just for the good of the order.

3:09

Uh can I accept a motion to approve the public comment policy?

3:13

So moved.

3:14

Craig, thank you.

3:17

Seconded.

3:18

Thank you, Leslie.

3:19

Any further discussion?

3:21

All those in favor say aye.

3:22

Aye.

3:22

Aye.

3:23

Any opposed?

3:24

Okay.

3:25

And then we'll have a motion to adopt the what do we call on this?

3:31

The postponement policy.

3:34

Postponement policy.

3:35

That sounds good.

3:40

I'll make the motion.

3:43

I'll say second the motion.

3:44

Okay, here thank you.

3:46

Any further discussion?

3:48

All those in favor say aye.

3:49

Aye.

3:49

Aye.

3:50

Any opposed.

3:51

Okay, the ayes have it.

3:53

Uh and for the public, uh, under the under the provisions of our new public uh comment policy.

4:02

So we'll continue to take public comment on agenda items at the or toward the conclusion of that particular agenda item and before any action is taken.

4:12

Um it will be restricted to residents, and you will be restricted to three minutes uh um timing.

4:18

And then at the end of the meeting, we will have uh general public comment for any item that uh public wishes to bring before the planning commission.

4:30

So moving forward, we'll go on to item number three, which is also administrative, and uh I'll turn it over to staff for an introduction, please.

4:39

Sure.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Engineering And Infrastructure█████████████████████████████████████████████46%
Procedural██████████10%
Technology and Innovation██████████10%
Public Engagement██████████10%
Community Engagement█████5%
Affordable Housing████4%
Public Safety████4%
Historic Preservation████4%
Environmental Protection███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Allentown Planning Commission Monthly Meeting - July 14, 2026

The Allentown City Planning Commission met on July 14, 2026 to consider adoption of administrative policies, amendments to data center regulations, a preliminary/final land development for a mixed-use building, and a sketch plan for a medical office building. The meeting also included staff updates and a vote to adopt a 4.5-hour meeting time limit.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes (June 9, 2026): Unanimously approved as written.
  • Administrative Policies: Two policies adopted unanimously (5-0): ACPC Postponement Policy (establishing a 26-hour deadline for applicant-requested postponements) and ACPC Public Participation Policy (restricting public comment to Allentown residents/taxpayers, limiting comments to three minutes, and taking public comment on agenda items before action and on non-agenda items at meeting end).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item #3 – Data Center Amendments: Kathryn Hoffman (1649 W. Linden St.) expressed support for mandates but objected to “if possible” phrasing for water/electric limits and questioned enforcement capacity. Bonnie McMahon (934 N. 26th St.) asked if smaller data centers (<50,000 sq ft) are regulated and whether the sound study covers infrasound. Alejandro Figueroa (Emmaus, taxpayer) urged inclusion of closed-loop cooling and waste heat recovery requirements.
  • Item #4 – West Residences: Alejandro Figueroa asked if the building was in a flood zone; the applicant confirmed it was not.
  • Item #5 – 3995 Tilghman Street: Tom Whelan (3957 W. Washington St., HOA member) requested repair of the deteriorating fence and asked if the facility would be urgent care; applicant stated it was not planned as urgent care.

Discussion Items

  • Data Center Ordinance Amendments (Bill 52-2026): Staff (Jennifer Gomez) reviewed amendments to the recently adopted Bill 20: removing Special Exception use for data centers in the IG district (maintained in IM district), increasing setback from sensitive receptors from 200 to 500 feet (measured from lot lines regardless of streets), adding public notification requirements (applicant-required public meeting and project website), refining noise/vibration regulations (full-spectrum sound studies, third-party acoustical consultants), and adding a decommissioning requirement with financial security. Commissioner Brown noted the ordinance is advisory; planning commission forwards recommendations to City Council. A motion to forward with a favorable recommendation passed 5-0.
  • West Residences at 2 Allen Street (Preliminary/Final – LMA-2025-00028): Staff (Melissa Velez) presented revised plans for a 7-story mixed-use building with 200 dwelling units (50 studios, 107 one-bedroom, 43 two-bedroom), 18,000 sq ft retail, and 200 parking spaces. The design pays homage to the Sussman Building. Staff highlighted remaining issues: loading/unloading dimensions, screening for garage headlight glare, streetscape enhancements, parking for retail/visitors, pedestrian easement on Brick Street, and lack of overall vision for the waterfront. Applicant (Carlos Tovar) responded: building moved 5 ft back from Brick Street, narrower garage windows with solid panels, restriping Riverside Drive for on-street parking, 40 public parking spaces rotating after-hours, terraces, green roof, and sustainable features. Discussion included placemaking, bike/pedestrian connections, affordable housing, lighting intensity, landscaping, cornice design, and bird-friendly windows. Commissioner Brown expressed disappointment that the Sussman Building was not retained but understood costs. Public comment: none on this item. Motion for conditional approval passed 4-0 (Commissioner Hartzell recused).
  • 3995 Tilghman Street (Sketch Plan – LMA-2026-00008): Staff (Melissa Velez) reviewed a proposal to demolish an existing restaurant and build a 2-story, 20,200 sq ft medical office building in the MX-S zone. The building design (brick/stone veneer) was well regarded. Staff recommended moving the building closer to the street, adding a second entrance, providing bike parking, improving landscaping/streetscape, and adding lighting. Applicant (John McRoberts) explained that a 60-ft drainage easement prevents moving the building forward; they will seek zoning board relief. A second entrance was deemed not feasible for a single-tenant medical building. They agreed to bike racks, a marked pedestrian path, and a courtesy copy to South Whitehall Township. No action required; comments provided for future plan submissions.
  • Other Matters: Staff announced the retirement of Chief Planner Jesse Sadiua after 12 years and the promotion of Melissa Velez to Chief Planner. The commission discussed setting a meeting end time to avoid exhaustive reviews. A motion to adopt a 4.5-hour meeting duration (with a 10 PM hard stop for the upcoming July 16 special meeting) passed unanimously.

Key Outcomes

  • Item #1 – Minutes: Approved unanimously.
  • Item #2 – Policies: Both adopted unanimously (5-0).
  • Item #3 – Bill 52: Motion to forward to City Council with a favorable recommendation passed 5-0.
  • Item #4 – West Residences: Motion for conditional preliminary/final approval passed 4-0 (Commissioner Hartzell abstained). Conditions include: garage window material to fully prevent headlight glare; designate non-residential parking; reduce/shield lighting on Brick Street; enhance landscaping with a landscape architect; enhance rooftop cornice or incorporate Sussman Building details; consider bird-friendly windows; provide pet waste and cigarette disposal stations; comply with staff report and city comment letter. Approval tied to building elevations dated May 6, 2026.
  • Item #5 – 3995 Tilghman Street: Sketch plan review; no formal action. Commission provided comments for subsequent submissions.
  • Meeting Time Limit: Motion to set a 4.5-hour meeting duration (with a specified end time of 10 PM for the July 16 special meeting) passed unanimously.

Meeting Transcript

All right, right. Okay, everybody, I'm gonna call this meeting of the City of Allentown Planning Commission to order. Thank you for joining us. Um approval of the meeting minutes from the June 9th meeting. We've been prepared and circulated. Does anybody have any comments, corrections, or additions? Okay, hearing none, those will stand approved as written. Uh next we have a couple pardon me. Sorry. We had a uh uh public meeting comment card submitted by Bonnie McMahon on item number one, which was the minutes in the I'm sorry, I didn't I was wanted to talk about the data center. Okay. So I had the we just wanted to clarify. Thank you. We'll call you then. Yeah. No, that's okay, thank you. Um so then we have two administrative matters today, the first being a couple policies and procedures. Uh one having to do with public comment policy. Um the planning commission had not previously had any sort of formally adopted um policy, and I think one has been prepared that largely mimics or mirrors the city council and um general uh intent of the city charter. So um that's been prepared and circulated for us, and I know we had the opportunity to reply individually back to staff. Um so I assume that the version that's been included in our packet is the final version, and does anybody have any further comments or discussion about it? Okay, um I suppose we should make uh we should take a motion to go ahead and formally adopting public comment probably to get public comment on the public comment policy um but uh but also I think because it's on the agenda once, um if you could talk about the second policy related to tabling, which a very short explanation of the tabling policy is simply that um to grant the tabling request if they're submitted in advance of 26 hours before the meeting, so we can amend the agenda and then if it's submitted afterwards, then make the applicant come to the meeting and and request it themselves. Right. Yeah, we were just talking about that, and I think we we've we've talked about that in the past. I guess this is just the formal adoption of a policy. So is there any comment on that one? All right, so we have two two administrative matters. Is there anybody in the public interested in questions or comments relative to our public comment policy or our policy regarding the voluntary tabling of a project on behalf of the client or the applicant, I should say? Okay, we're hearing none. So then I guess we'll take these individually just for the good of the order. Uh can I accept a motion to approve the public comment policy? So moved. Craig, thank you. Seconded. Thank you, Leslie. Any further discussion? All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. And then we'll have a motion to adopt the what do we call on this? The postponement policy. Postponement policy. That sounds good. I'll make the motion. I'll say second the motion. Okay, here thank you. Any further discussion? All those in favor say aye.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com