OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Urban Design Commission Meeting Summary - December 10, 2025

Assembly & Committee MeetingsThursday, December 11, 2025
BodyAnchorage, Alaska
SessionAssembly & Committee Meetings
DateThursday, December 11, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:13

Good evening.

0:14

It's 6 30 p.m.

0:16

December 10th, 2025, and the meeting of the Urban Design Commission will now come to order.

0:21

May we please have a roll call?

0:24

Monica Sullivan.

0:25

Here.

0:26

Edith McKee.

0:27

Here.

0:27

Alison Lenny.

0:29

Here.

0:29

Julia Foland.

0:32

Here.

0:34

Alexandra Nanello.

0:36

Here.

0:37

Trevor Burrus.

0:40

Here.

0:40

James Claus.

0:42

Here.

0:42

You have a quorum.

0:43

Thank you.

0:45

Thank you.

0:46

May we get a motion to approve the minutes from September 24th, 2025.

1:02

It's been moved by Commissioner Lennox and seconded by Commissioner Calls.

1:07

Are there any corrections to the minutes?

1:14

Are there any objections to the minutes being approved?

1:20

Hearing none, the minutes are approved.

1:25

Um next we're moving on to the special order of business.

1:28

Are there any disclosures this evening?

1:34

Nope.

1:36

Okay.

1:37

We'll move on.

1:38

We there is nothing on the consent agenda.

1:40

We have no unfinished business.

1:43

We will now move on to public hearings, and I will read the public process.

2:00

The chair will ask for public testimony on the issue.

2:04

Two, persons who wish to testify will follow the time limits established in the Urban Design Commission rules of procedure.

2:11

Petitioners, including all his, her, their representatives, will have 10 minutes.

2:16

Rebuttal by the petitioner may be allowed when time has been reserved.

2:20

Representatives of groups, community councils, PTAs, etc.

2:24

will have five minutes, and individuals will have three minutes.

2:49

A written notice of intent to appeal in accordance with AMC 21.03.050A.

3:00

Commission recommendations to the Anchorage Assembly are not appealable.

3:05

Following approval of the written findings of facts, this call is no longer being recorded.

3:12

Any party of interest may within 20 days file an appeal by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee and deposit in accordance with section 21.03.050.

3:24

The notice of appeal must be filed with a planning director on a form prescribed by the municipality.

3:30

If the appellant is not the applicant, the appellant's notice of appeal shall include proof of service on the applicant.

3:43

With respect to case 2025 0142, the petitioner is requesting major site plan review for 2026 Town Square Park Improvements.

3:54

May we please have staff's presentation.

3:56

Thank you, Madam Chair.

3:57

MOA Parks and Recreation has submitted major site plan review for improvements within Town Square Park in downtown Anchorage.

4:04

Town Square Park is five individual lots with a portion of 20-foot alleyway bifurcating the north parcels from the south parcel.

4:12

The improvements are categorized into two phases and align with the 2019 Town Square Park Master Plan.

4:19

The petitioner attended a pre-application conference with reviewing agencies on September 23rd, 2025, in accordance with AMC 2103080C2.

4:30

The petitioner met with the downtown community council on May 7th, 2025, and September 3rd, 2025.

4:37

That's found in attachment two of the application, which includes the petitioner's affidavit of posting, community meeting summary, and applications submittal to the planning department.

4:46

The planning department mailed 446 public hearing notices on November 18th, 2025.

4:52

The department also provided notice to all community councils.

4:55

The Rabbit Creek Community Council submitted written comments.

5:00

There is one late comment from Diane Holmes item G1, supplementary item number one that is in your packet.

5:05

There were no other public comments received by the planning department.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Parks and Recreation█████████████████████████████████████████████56%
Procedural██████████████17%
Public Engagement███████9%
Urban Planning███████9%
Public Safety███4%
Economic Development██2%
Transportation Safety██2%
Homelessness1%
Summary of Proceedings

Urban Design Commission Meeting Summary - December 10, 2025

This meeting of the Anchorage Urban Design Commission, held on December 10, 2025, commenced at 6:30 p.m. with a roll call establishing a quorum. The commission approved the minutes from September 24, 2025, and proceeded to a public hearing regarding Case 2025-0142, the Major Site Plan Review for 2026 Town Square Park Improvements. Following presentation and public testimony, the commission voted unanimously to approve the project.

Consent Calendar

  • The minutes from September 24, 2025, were approved unanimously on a motion by Commissioner Lenny and second by Commissioner Claus.
  • No items were placed on the consent agenda.
  • No unfinished business was identified.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Commissioner Sullivan: Expressed strong support for safety improvements regarding clear visibility and wide walkways. However, the speaker voiced concern that the current design lacks sufficient elements to create a vibrant, year-round winter atmosphere. Commissioner Sullivan stated a desire for permanent infrastructure to bring business and "eyes on the park" to the downtown area, specifically noting the loneliness of the park in winter and the desire for year-round activity to counter safety fears.
  • Commissioner Lenning: Expressed support for the plan, specifically commending the extensive public outreach. The commissioner raised concerns about sound carry due to the lowered topography but accepted the proposed tree buffer solution. Commissioner Lenning clarified that the intent to eliminate evergreen trees was for safety reasons. The speaker raised questions about whether the planting beds would be reduced in number or size, and clarified that the project does not include paving in the rights-of-way for ADA compliance. Commissioner Lenning expressed support for preserving the existing donor bricks via a digital tribute.
  • Commissioner Collis: Stated support for the layout, noting it would be easier to maintain. The commissioner inquired about the garden bed size, confirming the intent to maintain the existing square footage based on horticulture capacity. Commissioner Collis raised a question regarding the permanent nature of the string lighting versus seasonal lighting. The speaker suggested that future policy changes might be necessary regarding permanent public sanitation facilities and commended the use of portable restrooms over permanent green space usage.
  • Chris Beck (Advisory Group Member): Expressed a fundamental concern that the design effectively converts the park into a "plaza" which may not be sufficient to overcome the challenge of a space that is "dead 90% of the time." Speaker Beck argued that the current plan does not provide enough reasons for year-round use. The speaker stated that the only way to ensure success is to allow for enclosed, permanent buildings, change the city charter to permit them, and bring year-round businesses (like coffee shops) onto the site. Position: The speaker warned that without permanent structures and charter changes to enable year-round activity, the project will not adequately activate the space.
  • Project Team (Tanya Hong, Una Martin, Lauren Bisha): Stated that the site plan aligns with the 2019 Master Plan. The team explained that permanent buildings are prohibited by the Anchorage Charter and that utility lines cannot cross property lines without a complex resubdivision process. They confirmed that lighting (including string lighting) is planned for Phase 2 via the 2026 bond and that vendor areas will be used for events but not as permanent structures.

Discussion Items

  • Safety and Visibility: The commission discussed how lowering the topography (removing mounds to 42 inches) and removing evergreen trees improves sightlines. Commissioner Lenning asked about sound mitigation; the team explained that deciduous trees along the perimeter will be used to dampen sound from busy streets while maintaining visibility.
  • Winter Activation and Business: Commissioners discussed the lack of winter activity. Commissioner Sullivan asked about bringing in permanent businesses; staff reiterated that the current charter prohibits permanent buildings, and moving this would require a citizen vote. Commissioner Sullivan noted that current businesses across the street do not integrate with the park.
  • Restrooms and Bike Storage: Commissioner Sullivan inquired about permanent restrooms. Staff confirmed that the charter forbids permanent buildings, so portable restrooms will be used with a maintenance contract. Regarding bike lockers, the team explained that flat grading is required for lockers, which conflicts with the current budget and grading philosophy, so they are evaluating feasibility.
  • Planting Beds and Drainage: Commissioner Collis asked if planting beds would be reduced. The project manager stated the square footage will remain equal to current greenhouse capacity. Regarding drainage, the team confirmed the inclusion of a rain garden and landscape depressions to manage stormwater.
  • Donor Bricks and Memorials: The team explained that incorporating existing donor bricks into a vertical structure is not cost-effective due to the size; instead, they will be returned to donors, with a digital tribute and interpretive signage created. Memorials for the park founders (Shirley Brundage and Avis Couples) will include plaques and boulders.
  • F Street and Vendor Areas: The commission clarified that the F Street Plaza is intended for temporary vendor tents and events, not permanent structures. The team confirmed that vendor trucks will be electric to mitigate air quality concerns.
  • Cooperative Use Agreements: The team explained that the "Kobuk" (Kobuk Theater) area would have a cooperative use agreement allowing them to bring their own seating, but it would remain public space.
  • Sunset of the UDC: The Planning Director noted that the commission may be sunsetting pending a vote by the Assembly. Commissioners expressed sadness and gratitude for their service, with the Planning Director inviting them to serve on other boards like the Planning and Zoning Commission.

Key Outcomes

  • Approval: Case 2025-0142 (2026 Town Square Park Improvements) was approved by a unanimous vote (7-0-0).
  • Conditions of Approval: The approval is subject to conditions one, two, and three as outlined in the staff report.
  • Findings of Fact: Commissioner Lenning stated that the project meets all four approval criteria under AMC 21.03.180F, including consistency with the 2019 Master Plan, compliance with design standards, mitigation of adverse impacts, and alignment with the Comprehensive Plan goals for safety, accessibility, and civic involvement.
  • Next Steps: The project moves forward with the 2025 bond funding for Phase 1 (demolition, site improvements, electrical). Phase 2 lighting and string lighting are contingent on the 2026 bond. The Planning Department will manage the implementation of portable restrooms and evaluate bike locker feasibility.
  • Institutional Change: The commission acknowledged the potential sunset of the Urban Design Commission, pending Assembly action, and conveyed final sentiments of gratitude to the community and staff before adjourning at 7:34 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening. It's 6 30 p.m. December 10th, 2025, and the meeting of the Urban Design Commission will now come to order. May we please have a roll call? Monica Sullivan. Here. Edith McKee. Here. Alison Lenny. Here. Julia Foland. Here. Alexandra Nanello. Here. Trevor Burrus. Here. James Claus. Here. You have a quorum. Thank you. Thank you. May we get a motion to approve the minutes from September 24th, 2025. It's been moved by Commissioner Lennox and seconded by Commissioner Calls. Are there any corrections to the minutes? Are there any objections to the minutes being approved? Hearing none, the minutes are approved. Um next we're moving on to the special order of business. Are there any disclosures this evening? Nope. Okay. We'll move on. We there is nothing on the consent agenda. We have no unfinished business. We will now move on to public hearings, and I will read the public process. The chair will ask for public testimony on the issue. Two, persons who wish to testify will follow the time limits established in the Urban Design Commission rules of procedure. Petitioners, including all his, her, their representatives, will have 10 minutes. Rebuttal by the petitioner may be allowed when time has been reserved. Representatives of groups, community councils, PTAs, etc. will have five minutes, and individuals will have three minutes. A written notice of intent to appeal in accordance with AMC 21.03.050A. Commission recommendations to the Anchorage Assembly are not appealable. Following approval of the written findings of facts, this call is no longer being recorded. Any party of interest may within 20 days file an appeal by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee and deposit in accordance with section 21.03.050. The notice of appeal must be filed with a planning director on a form prescribed by the municipality. If the appellant is not the applicant, the appellant's notice of appeal shall include proof of service on the applicant. With respect to case 2025 0142, the petitioner is requesting major site plan review for 2026 Town Square Park Improvements. May we please have staff's presentation. Thank you, Madam Chair. MOA Parks and Recreation has submitted major site plan review for improvements within Town Square Park in downtown Anchorage.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com