The City of Annapolis Finance Committee held a special meeting on May 11, 2026, from 2:18 PM to 4:53 PM to deliberate and approve the Finance Committee Report and Recommendations for the Fiscal Year 2027 budget. The committee, consisting of Alderman Huntley, Alderwoman O'Neill, and Alderman Thorp, reviewed each section of the report, discussed positions on various budget items, and voted on final recommendations. Deputy City Manager Guild, Assistant City Attorney Leonard, and Budget Analyst Turner were present to answer questions.
Committee is called order at 2 18 p.m. on May 11th, 2026. Thanks everybody for being here with us today. Yeah, we're what we're gonna do today is go through the finance committee report. We've got it up on the screen and really we'll just walk through it. Um I'm not gonna read every section by any means. The point is to just kind of go section by section. If one of my colleagues on the committee has something they feel like we need to further discuss, just jump in and raise it, and then we will vote on the recommendations for each section. Um we can start right here in the top. Uh maybe not right in the top unless any of you have an issue with my West Moore quote. But uh I think making clear what the priorities that were most commonly mentioned were a really good way to start this off strong. So um the we're we're working through exactly how to mention these, so transportation infrastructure, or perhaps just improved infrastructure, uh, which we have sidewalks, crosswalks, walkability, street lights, speed reduction, smart signals, and raise intersections. I think that covers it. I'm sorry. Yeah. Isn't there a part of this report that's in here? Um you're saying report to the city council, like it should give it a breakdown. I think the first thing should be the um the quote. Oh, does it uh oh well oh I see what you're saying? No, there was uh there was a graphic beforehand. Uh Mitchell is updating that graphic. Okay. Yeah, all right. Is there anything else we were missing? Yes, because that was in there. She actually had already updated it, but the one thing she didn't change was changing 26 to 27. So she's just gotta fix that. Okay. Okay, so improved infrastructure. I've just copied what was from that presentation. So sidewalks, crosswalks, walkability, street lights, speed reduction, smart signals, raise, oh, intersections. Yeah, I think that's yeah. I think that just about gets at it. And then with that, I'd be fine with deleting this better service delivery for residents. Um yeah, I mean, yeah, the reason I think we could delete it is because you think community programs and environment and sustainability more or less cover it. Um maybe the one thing that I'm seeing in here, or that I'm not seeing in here that was on my mind under service delivery is uh improved permitting times. So maybe I could just lump that under environment and sustainability or service. Well, no, I'm suggesting we delete service delivery because I think it's covered under other things. Or if you think there's enough things that are not covered, we can put a parenthesis behind it and list a couple things. Okay, so service delivery was not a term used in the brief. Correct. So that's why you're adding it there, because it was talked about. So I wrote better service delivery. And then you suggested later that we just use the terms for the brief, which I think is smart. So service delivery is sort of a holdover, and I'm suggesting we either cut it or if there are parts of service delivery that are not in here currently that we put a parenthesis to say what we mean by service delivery. How about I like your idea of service delivery and it I think karma had something, but you know, to your point, parent, permit, permits, parking, uh. removal, snow and garbage removal. Yeah. Yeah. That works.