Environmental Matters Committee Regular Meeting – June 11, 2026
Environmental Matters Committee Regular Meeting – June 11, 2026
The Environmental Matters Committee met on June 11, 2026, from 3:03 PM to 5:03 PM to receive updates on Spa Creek water quality, state forest conservation legislation, and city resilience and sustainability initiatives. All three committee members were present.
Consent Calendar
- The agenda was approved on a voice vote.
- The minutes from the May 14, 2026 meeting were approved.
Discussion Items
-
State of Spa Creek (ID-34-26): Amy Clements (Spa Creek Conservancy) and Tammy Domanski (Anne Arundel Community College) presented 10 years of water quality monitoring data. Key findings:
- Bacteria levels are primarily driven by rainfall; 2025 was a dry year but rain often fell the day before sampling, leading to elevated bacteria counts. Nearly half of sampling days were affected by rain, and one third by more than an inch.
- Geometric mean bacteria concentrations exceeded the 35 CFU/100 mL threshold at all monitored sites in 2025, worsening from 2024.
- Nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus) and chlorophyll showed decreases in scores; dissolved oxygen also declined in 2025 but long-term trends show improvement at some sites.
- Source typing for bacteria and nutrients remains inconclusive; DNA testing by a private company was poor. A collaboration with the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center is being explored.
- The committee discussed swimming safety, signage, and public education. Alderman Savidge presented a plaque to Tammy Domanski for a decade of data collection.
-
Urban Forester Update (ID-136-26): City Forester Brian Adams summarized state legislation (HB 1511 and SB 526) that moves Maryland from "no net loss" to a "net gain" forest policy, effective July 1, 2026. Major changes include:
- 1:1 mitigation ratio (already city practice).
- Urban forests as priority retention areas.
- Exemptions for solar facilities, transit-oriented development, and multifamily housing (25+ units).
- New alternatives like planted green infrastructure.
- The committee will introduce legislation in July under a compressed schedule to adopt state requirements. Alderman Savidge also proposed parallel legislation to ensure multifamily projects over 20 units still have tree canopy requirements.
-
Resilience & Sustainability Update (ID-3-26): Deputy City Manager Jackie Guild reported:
- Energy Efficiency: Free LED retrofits completed at Forest Drive Fire Station; projected annual savings of $12,000–$85,000 across multiple city buildings. A $400,000 state grant will fund a detailed streetlight audit; purchasing BGE-owned lights could save $1.8M over 20 years (4.4-year payback).
- Solar: Community solar contract with Sun Central saves $66,000–$127,000 per year. New residential solar partnership with Solar United Neighbors launched.
- Electric Ferry: Awaiting FTA ruling on cash vs. in-kind match; $250,000 contribution secured from marina development. RFI/RFQ due October 2026.
- Leaf Blower Enforcement: Three citations upheld in court; proposed part-time enforcement position (~$55,000) needs council funds. Rebate program for landscapers has $30,000 remaining.
- Electric Vehicles: Charging infrastructure at police station planned; fleet assessment funded by BGE (city pays $2,500).
Key Outcomes
- The committee will consider recurring Spa Creek updates.
- Forest conservation ordinance update will be fast-tracked for July passage; parallel legislation on multifamily projects may be introduced.
- Streetlight purchase and LED conversion will advance using grant and alternative financing.
- Leaf blower enforcement position will be presented for council budget consideration.
- Electric ferry project continues; FTA response on match flexibility expected.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon, everybody. We'll call into order the June 11th meeting for environmental matters. For the record, we have old woman Taisha Conti present. OC virtual. So we can get um Alban Hotley on roll call. All right. So for roll call. We have Alderman Conti. Here. Alderman Huntley. I'm here. Right, thank you. And have approval of approval of the agenda. Is there a motion? Motion. Is there a second? Can I get a second to approve the agenda? Second. Thank you. All those approved all those who approved, please say aye. Aye. Motion carries. Thank you. Next up, business miscellaneous approval of the minutes from May 14th. Is there a motion to approve the minutes? So moved. Second. Seconded. All those in favor, please say aye. Motion carries. Thank you. And then general discussion. I'm gonna take privilege of the chair to reorganize this a little bit, because it did tell, I think I believe I told public works I'd get them out of here soon since they're doing us a favor and coming today. So I want to start with ID 3426, state of Spa Creek. So do we have somebody who's willing? So the reason this came up, you can come on to the table or the if there's more than one of you can come up to the table. So thank you for joining us today. Um where this came from is that we have received over the past few months various um concerns that have been raised by the public and the committee and elsewhere about the quality of Spa Creek. And so I wanted to just actually hear from those of you who are actually monitoring and seeing the watershed every day to see what the data shows, and to find out from you if there's any way we can assist you in those efforts. And so with that, if you could just introduce yourselves. So I have the presentation, uh, the PowerPoint that I use for the full presentation. Oh, you make sure you can each take a mic. Uh but I'm I'd like to shorten that a lot and just give the highlights, which I'm sure you're all you will all appreciate a lot also. So we've been monitoring on Spa Creek, uh Spa Creek and Bat Creek for 10 years now. And so the process or the program has expanded a lot over those years, and so when you look at this map, this map shows that the the goal is really to hit all parts of Spa Creek and Back Creek. So we have uh a couple of sites, Cherry Grove and Children's Museum, CG and SEM that are up in the headwaters, uh non-title to barely title, and then through the rest of Spa Creek, we have several sites that are shore-based and several that are midstream all the way out to the mouth. And then it's fewer years, but we still have now going on four-ish years on back creek with the same idea. Really, we have some sites that are very close to shore and then a couple of midstream sites. The concept being that um people get into the water at the shore, so we want an idea of what the shore is like, as well as the midstream area where you're gonna get more flushing and more dilution, more movement, everything. So for the assessment of the water, one thing that we don't do, so when we think about the report every year for Spa Creek Conservancy uh or Spa Creek, I don't think about it as a letter grade, and I know the slide makes it look like we're showing lighter grades.
openpublica.com