OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Arlington, Texas/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Arlington City Council Special Meeting Summary – October 28, 2026

City Council — Wednesday, October 28, 2026
BodyArlington, Texas
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, October 28, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:45:43

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Unassigned speaker

8:36

Okay,

Speaker 1

8:36

we're gonna go ahead and call the afternoon of the city council meeting to order it.

2:30:47

Okay, good afternoon.

2:30:48

We're gonna go ahead and call the session back to order again.

2:30:54

Figure out where we went to.

2:30:55

We are now at 3.1 with Mr.

2:30:58

Alex Bluskin.

Unassigned speaker

2:31:00

Thank

Speaker 2

2:31:00

you, Mayor.

2:31:01

Mayor, members of council, Alex Vuskin, Director of Code

Speaker 3

2:31:04

Compliance Services.

Speaker 2

2:31:05

Our topic for this presentation is the International Property Maintenance Code.

2:31:09

You may recall this was a topic of discussion earlier this year at the community and neighborhood development committee during the multifamily inspections process discussion.

2:31:20

At the time we were recommending this as a potential option for multifamily properties, and the committee uh suggested looking at implementing it for all properties uh throughout the city.

2:31:32

So we've also provided some information about this code during the uh presentation in August uh to the council about single family shared rental properties.

2:31:41

So some of the information will be familiar to

Unassigned speaker

2:31:44

you.

Unassigned speaker

2:31:46

So

Speaker 2

2:31:46

the International Property Maintenance Code or the IPMC is a model code that's developed by the International Code Council, and it sets minimum safety and maintenance standards for all residential and non-residential structures and existing premises.

2:32:01

The IPMC is reviewed on a three-year cycle by subject matter experts in the code enforcement field, also in building uh building the building industry and design professionals to ensure that it's kept up to date.

2:32:16

Um changes are recommended during those review cycles to recommend to cities who have adopted this code.

2:32:23

Um existing structures and premises that do not comply uh with the provisions in the code shall be altered or repaired to provide a reasonable minimum level of health safety and general welfare as required within the code.

Unassigned speaker

2:32:40

So

Speaker 2

2:32:41

you may ask what other cities are using this code.

2:32:43

So we found quite a few in Texas that have adopted all our portions of the IPMC, including some of our other larger cities throughout the state, like Austin, Houston, Plano, McKinney, San Antonio.

2:32:56

Um we reached out to some of those cities to ask them about their experiences with the code.

2:33:01

The feedback that we received was generally pretty positive.

2:33:04

Um Plano is one that we reached out to, and they have applied this code across the board to all properties since 2005.

2:33:12

Um they felt that it provided a centralized, clearly defined framework for property maintenance standards, and it allows the city the flexibility to amend provisions and address local issues that are not covered in other ordinances.

2:33:26

So they they felt like it had been a positive for the city of Plano.

2:33:32

The components of the IPMC, it has seven chapters in it, um, and they they cover premises, structures, equipment, facilities, um components like light, ventilation, space, heating and sanitation, protection from the elements.

2:33:49

Um team in code compliance, along with the city attorney's office, the planning and development services department, both the building inspections group, and the health division have have all reviewed uh and also fire prevention, excuse me, from the fire department.

2:34:04

There is a chapter on fire safety.

2:34:05

We've all reviewed these chapters to uh make sure that everything is in in line with our current ordinances, uh determine what local amendments, deletions need to be made, um, to ensure that we don't have any conflicts if council chooses to adopt this.

2:34:22

So we've conducted a pretty thorough review to make sure that we have a good understanding of what's included and it's in line with current ordinances.

Unassigned speaker

2:34:32

So

Speaker 2

2:34:33

adopting model codes is not is not new for the city of Arlington.

2:34:36

The city has adopted quite a few other model codes.

2:34:39

They cover a wide range of different topics, uh building codes, energy conservation, fire code, mechanical and plumbing, swimming pools, and electrical.

2:34:49

This is a common practice here in the city of Arlington and as well as in many other cities.

Unassigned speaker

2:35:00

I wanted to talk briefly about a few of our existing code compliance tools, some of which you you may already be familiar with, but the uniform housing code is one that's used frequently by our multifamily team to address issues like door safety, weather protection, fire hazards, hazardous wiring.

Speaker 2

2:35:17

The nuisance chapter covers a lot of the typical violations that we see in our neighborhoods, high weeds and grass, uh unclean premises, parking in the yard, nuisance landscaping.

2:35:29

Those are common code violations that we see in in residential neighborhoods.

2:35:34

The streets and sidewalks chapter has provisions related to overhanging tree limbs and site obstructions.

2:35:41

Health and sanitation is going to cover items like trash containers and trash card storage.

Unassigned speaker

2:35:48

We

Speaker 2

2:35:48

use the construction chapter for dangerous buildings, our dangerous and substandard structure inspector frequently uses the provisions in that code for dangerous buildings throughout the city.

2:35:59

We can also use that for work without a permit.

2:36:02

And then we use a couple of provisions from the Unified Development Code as well.

2:36:06

Uh highlighted use standards for business out of home, and then also design and development standards.

2:36:15

What does the IPMC add to our existing tools?

2:36:18

So this provides a certain level of standards for properties that are built before 2016 or 2014, and that covers items like landscaping or parking lot standards.

2:36:28

Um it allows us to enforce codes for non-habitability issues or non-weatherproofing issues like cracked windows, peeling paint, or missing mortar.

2:36:37

It provides just a general higher level of maintenance standards and provides clarity in our existing tools for enforcement.

2:36:45

And we feel after reviewing the code that it complements the ordinances that we currently have in place would be beneficial to our team moving forward.

2:37:01

So I won't go through every single provision, but I did want to highlight a couple of examples where in our review we felt like this would be beneficial to us.

2:37:09

Um mentioned peeling, flaking, and chip paint is covered under our uniform housing code.

2:37:14

Um the IPMC section 304.2 covers protective treatment.

2:37:19

Peeling, flaking, and chip paint shall be eliminated and surfaces repainted.

2:37:24

Um with the IPMC, we feel that this will allow us to address that issue without meeting additional requirements that uh under the Uniform Housing Code.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████████████56%
Public Transportation███████████████19%
Technology and Innovation██████7%
Zoning and Land Use█████6%
Engineering And Infrastructure██3%
Environmental Protection██2%
Arts And Culture██2%
Public Safety█1%
Community Engagement█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Arlington City Council Special Meeting Summary – October 28, 2026

The Arlington City Council met in special session on October 28, 2026, in the Council Briefing Room at Arlington City Hall. The meeting opened with an executive session under Texas Government Code Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, and 551.087, followed by work-session presentations and issue-session reports. No public comment period is reflected in the transcript. The afternoon session adjourned before the separately posted evening agenda, with council members planning to reconvene at 6:30 p.m. Note: the agenda attached to this record is dated October 27, 2026, while the meeting metadata identifies October 28, 2026 as the meeting date.

International Property Maintenance Code

  • Staff presented the International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC), a model code developed by the International Code Council and reviewed on a three-year cycle, setting minimum safety and maintenance standards for existing residential and non-residential structures.
  • Cities using the IPMC include Austin, Houston, Plano, McKinney, and San Antonio; Plano reported positive experience applying it citywide since 2005, citing a clear framework and flexibility to address local issues.
  • The IPMC would complement Arlington's existing tools (Uniform Housing Code, nuisance chapter, streets/sidewalks, health/sanitation, dangerous-buildings provisions) and add enforcement authority for items such as peeling paint, accessory-structure maintenance, commercial weather protection, and general exterior disrepair.
  • Proposed timeline: Building Code Board of Appeals review in November; City Council first reading on December 8 and final reading on December 15, if approved; effective date February 1, 2027.
  • No formal vote was taken. Council members responded favorably, with one member calling it a structured approach to closing gaps in existing codes.

Data Center Ordinance Options

  • Staff reviewed data center types, including hyperscale, co-located, enterprise, edge, high-performance computing, and cryptocurrency mining, and said the most likely forms in Arlington would be co-located, enterprise, and edge facilities.
  • Benefits were described as high-value investment with low traffic demand; concerns include noise, obsolescence, water use, and electric transmission infrastructure.
  • Staff explained noise measurement: dBA measures common environmental noise, while dBC captures low-frequency sound/vibration; the draft ordinance may also regulate “prominent discrete tones.” Cooling methods range from high-water evaporative cooling to closed-loop dry and immersion liquid cooling; dry methods use little/no water but can use up to about one-third more electricity.
  • Proposed principal-use regulations: specific use permit (SUP) only in LI and IM districts; PDs must explicitly allow data centers; evaporative cooling prohibited; 300-foot property-line-to-property-line setback from residential uses (same standard as gas wells); acoustical screening for ground and rooftop equipment; 75-foot maximum height; limits on generator testing times; pre-construction noise modeling; dBA/dBC limits; post-construction testing and remediation; parking only for office/meeting/security areas; and decommissioning/adaptive reuse plans.
  • Proposed accessory-use regulations: allowed in any non-residential district when tied to a principal use and under 50% of gross floor area; no outside backup generators; battery energy storage units permitted with limits; standalone accessory buildings capped at 20 feet in height and 1,000 square feet. Edge data center boxes would be allowed by right as accessory uses in any district, must be non-habitable, up to 200 square feet aggregate and 12 feet high, with no utility-scale battery system.
  • Councilmember Garcia Duma voiced support for keeping data centers as far from residential areas as possible and for noise modeling before SUP approval, so residents are protected before projects advance. Staff stressed the draft is a work in progress and subject to change.

Transportation Services Update

HandyTran

  • HandyTran serves riders 65 and older or with a documented disability, covering city limits plus 1.5 miles outside, with trips to/from CentrePort and Hurst/Bell TRE stations. Hours are Monday–Friday 7 a.m.–10 p.m. and Saturday 8 a.m.–9 p.m.; fare is $3 per person per ride; up to 34 vehicles run per day.
  • Cost-sharing: Fort Worth, Grand Prairie, and Dalworthington Gardens opted out, so their residents will lose HandyTran service on October 1, 2027. Mansfield, Kennedale, Forest Hills, and Euless have not yet decided; service to Penteco will continue under a mutual aid fire-services agreement.
  • Staff reported 137,513 completed trips in FY27 (a slight decrease), while most other metrics were labeled FY26. On-time performance was 96% in FY26, up 5% from FY25 and above the 90–95% industry standard. Active riders totaled 1,454; new applications totaled 577, the largest in eight years.
  • Ridership patterns: 32% of riders took 10 or fewer trips; 28% took more than 100 trips. Booking was 4% online and 50% by phone; remaining booking methods were not stated.
  • Cost and funding: average cost was $31.08 per trip; farebox covered 7% (industry range 4–9%), TxDOT 8%, FTA 59%, and city funds 26%. In dollars, total FY26 operating cost was about $4.3 million: $293,000 farebox, $341,000 TxDOT, $2.6 million FTA, and $1.1 million city general fund.
  • Council members praised improved service and noted complaint levels had decreased since the service changes.

Arlington On-Demand

  • On-Demand provides citywide public transit for the general public; hours are Monday–Friday 6 a.m.–9 p.m. and Saturday 9 a.m.–9 p.m. Fares range from $3 to $8 depending on distance, with a flat $3 fare to/from CentrePort TRE station. The fleet uses up to 62 six-passenger vans, 12 wheelchair accessible, including hybrid-electric Toyota Sienas.
  • Free ride programs: TCC offers free rides to Southeast Campus students; AISD is restarting free rides for at-risk students through student outreach; about 17 Arlington nonprofits receive free rides for low-income clients, averaging about 700 rides/month with a farebox value of about $3,200/month.
  • FY26 completed trips totaled 524,711; over 3.8 million trips have been completed since launch in 2017; weekly average is about 11,000 trips. Rider satisfaction is 4.85/5 stars. ETA averaged 14.6 minutes in the last two years, below Via's 18-minute comparative average. Utilization was 3.1 riders/vehicle/hour in FY26, above Via's average of 3.0; August/September reached 3.4–3.5. Met demand was 96%, with only 4% “seat unavailable” messages; Via's comparative average is 90%.
  • Average trip distance in FY26 was 7.3 miles; before the March fare change it was 7.5 miles and after it was 7.2 miles. Projected total operating cost for FY26 is about $9.6 million; city share is about 46% in recent years.
  • Sunday service: Via modeled Sunday demand at roughly 80% of Saturday levels (Saturday averages about 1,000–1,100 trips). Estimated city cost to add Sunday service is about $500,000–$1,000,000 per year, depending on FTA funding.
  • Councilmember Shelton expressed strong interest in adding Sunday service, calling Arlington too large to lack Sunday transit. Councilmember Garcia Duma asked about riders under 18 and free student ride programs; staff said riders must be 13 to ride alone, 6% of survey respondents are under 18, and 84% of trips are shared to some degree.
  • On autonomous vehicles, staff noted a prior RAPID pilot with Via provided over 100,000 autonomous rides with no safety incidents; future integration would likely be phased as technology and costs mature. Councilmember Hogg encouraged pursuing autonomous vehicles as a way to reduce driver costs and potentially enable Sunday service.

Citywide Art Projects

  • Councilmember Garcia Duma applauded Gary Packett and the citywide art team for commissioning local DFW artists and creating a sense of place. She cited University of Cincinnati research showing a 30% increase in foot traffic in mural areas and up to five times the city's average pedestrian volume near mural sites with restaurants. Staff noted the art effort spans multiple city departments.

Committee Reports

Finance and Audit – FY26 Audit Kickoff

  • The committee received the FY26 audit plan covering the year ending September 30, 2026. Work is scheduled in phases: planning/internal controls/risk assessment from November 2026 to January 2027; single-audit testing January–March 2027; final fieldwork and report issuance in March 2027.
  • Key audit focus areas: management override of controls, recognition of intergovernmental revenue, and compliance with federal and state grant requirements. The audit will implement GASB 103 and GASB 104.

Community and Neighborhood Development

  • Councilmember Hogg reported that the committee discussed single-family shared rental properties and multifamily recycling. On shared rentals, proposed ordinance changes would be triggered by permits for changes such as converting existing rooms into bedrooms; bedroom size would require at least one side to be 10 feet; existing configurations would be grandfathered unless the owner seeks a new permit.
  • Councilmember Garcia Duma noted the 10-foot-side rule was intended to preserve room dignity while allowing smaller, affordable homes to have three bedrooms; Councilmember Gonzalez also supported the approach. Staff compared rental registration programs in Carrollton, Garland, and Rowlett; a Board of Realtors meeting and a resident town hall are planned, with phased implementation.
  • On recycling, the committee endorsed expanding recycling to all multifamily properties through a franchise agreement with one vendor (Republic), transitioning existing contracts within 36 months or upon contract expiration, requiring site visits, calculating capacity in gallons per week, establishing per-unit billing, and reducing contamination. The franchise vendor would provide staffing, avoiding additional city personnel.

CVB, NLC, and NCTCOG Reports

  • CVB (reported by Councilmember Hogg): October 14 board meeting approved the FY27 budget; projected operating reserve balance is $761,000; UFL training camps generated 9,100 hotel room nights with a 10-to-1 ROI; Savannah Bananas had three sold-out nights with 36% of attendees from 50+ miles away and a $200,000 TPID sponsorship; hotel revenue was up 12% year-over-year through August; the Visit Arlington, Texas consumer brand launches in January 2027. Upcoming events include Women's World Boxing, Big 12 soccer and football, and UIL state football championships December 16–19.
  • NLC (reported by Councilmember Gonzalez): the Finance, Administration, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee met virtually October 15 and discussed intergovernmental relations policy and federal grant principles; NLC resolutions include support for the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, accurate 2030 census counts, streamlined federal grants, municipal bond tax exemptions, advanced refunding bond restoration, civic discourse, cryptocurrency regulation engagement, resolving state/federal cannabis conflicts, sustainable federal fiscal policy, and EITC/child tax credits. Data cited in the civic discourse resolution: 51% of surveyed local officials reported being insulted, 39% harassment, 17% threats, and 1% physical attacks in Q1 2026. Next meeting is November 18 at the NLC summit in Nashville.
  • NCTCOG (reported by Mayor): the Executive Board met October 22; released $145,000 for an independent North Texas air quality analysis because TCEQ data shows the region exceeding guidelines; authorized data sharing among NCTCOG, DART, Trinity Metro, and a Denton regional transit facilitator to optimize regional mobility.

Other Issues Session Items

  • Appointments: the City Secretary reported one board/commission appointment will be on the evening agenda.
  • Evening agenda items: Councilmember Garcia Duma noted that item 16.30 PICON had requested a continuance to November 10.
  • TML Region 8 Director Election: TML rules now require council action to cast the city's vote. Mayor raised concerns about one candidate based on documents and a recent KERA report and recommended Michael Browning, a council member from Alvarado. Council directed staff to prepare the resolution with Browning's name in the blank.
  • Resolution of Support for Ya'akub Ira Vijandre: tabled. The Mayor said he had spoken with Councilmember Pham and the city manager was coordinating a meeting to address underlying issues before further City Council action.
  • TxDOT project issues and future agenda items: no questions or additions were raised.

Key Outcomes

  • IPMC: council direction to proceed with Building Code Board of Appeals review in November, December 8 first reading, December 15 final reading, and February 1, 2027 effective date (pending approval).
  • Data center ordinance: no vote; staff will continue drafting, with council members emphasizing stronger residential setbacks and pre-SUP noise modeling.
  • Transportation: no formal decision; Sunday On-Demand service remains an option with a projected city cost of $500,000–$1,000,000 per year.
  • TML Region 8: council directed staff to name Michael Browning in the city's voting resolution.
  • CND: committee endorsed the multifamily recycling franchise approach and continued work on shared-rental ordinance changes and possible rental registration.
  • The resolution of support for Ya'akub Ira Vijandre was tabled indefinitely pending further meetings.
  • The afternoon/issue session adjourned with the council scheduled to reconvene at 6:30 p.m. for the evening agenda.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, we're gonna go ahead and call the afternoon of the city council meeting to order it. Okay, good afternoon. We're gonna go ahead and call the session back to order again. Figure out where we went to. We are now at 3.1 with Mr. Alex Bluskin. Thank you, Mayor. Mayor, members of council, Alex Vuskin, Director of Code Compliance Services. Our topic for this presentation is the International Property Maintenance Code. You may recall this was a topic of discussion earlier this year at the community and neighborhood development committee during the multifamily inspections process discussion. At the time we were recommending this as a potential option for multifamily properties, and the committee uh suggested looking at implementing it for all properties uh throughout the city. So we've also provided some information about this code during the uh presentation in August uh to the council about single family shared rental properties. So some of the information will be familiar to you. So the International Property Maintenance Code or the IPMC is a model code that's developed by the International Code Council, and it sets minimum safety and maintenance standards for all residential and non-residential structures and existing premises. The IPMC is reviewed on a three-year cycle by subject matter experts in the code enforcement field, also in building uh building the building industry and design professionals to ensure that it's kept up to date. Um changes are recommended during those review cycles to recommend to cities who have adopted this code. Um existing structures and premises that do not comply uh with the provisions in the code shall be altered or repaired to provide a reasonable minimum level of health safety and general welfare as required within the code. So you may ask what other cities are using this code. So we found quite a few in Texas that have adopted all our portions of the IPMC, including some of our other larger cities throughout the state, like Austin, Houston, Plano, McKinney, San Antonio. Um we reached out to some of those cities to ask them about their experiences with the code. The feedback that we received was generally pretty positive. Um Plano is one that we reached out to, and they have applied this code across the board to all properties since 2005. Um they felt that it provided a centralized, clearly defined framework for property maintenance standards, and it allows the city the flexibility to amend provisions and address local issues that are not covered in other ordinances. So they they felt like it had been a positive for the city of Plano. The components of the IPMC, it has seven chapters in it, um, and they they cover premises, structures, equipment, facilities, um components like light, ventilation, space, heating and sanitation, protection from the elements. Um team in code compliance, along with the city attorney's office, the planning and development services department, both the building inspections group, and the health division have have all reviewed uh and also fire prevention, excuse me, from the fire department. There is a chapter on fire safety. We've all reviewed these chapters to uh make sure that everything is in in line with our current ordinances, uh determine what local amendments, deletions need to be made, um, to ensure that we don't have any conflicts if council chooses to adopt this. So we've conducted a pretty thorough review to make sure that we have a good understanding of what's included and it's in line with current ordinances. So adopting model codes is not is not new for the city of Arlington. The city has adopted quite a few other model codes. They cover a wide range of different topics, uh building codes, energy conservation, fire code, mechanical and plumbing, swimming pools, and electrical. This is a common practice here in the city of Arlington and as well as in many other cities. I wanted to talk briefly about a few of our existing code compliance tools, some of which you you may already be familiar with, but the uniform housing code is one that's used frequently by our multifamily team to address issues like door safety, weather protection, fire hazards, hazardous wiring. The nuisance chapter covers a lot of the typical violations that we see in our neighborhoods, high weeds and grass, uh unclean premises, parking in the yard, nuisance landscaping. Those are common code violations that we see in in residential neighborhoods. The streets and sidewalks chapter has provisions related to overhanging tree limbs and site obstructions. Health and sanitation is going to cover items like trash containers and trash card storage. We use the construction chapter for dangerous buildings, our dangerous and substandard structure inspector frequently uses the provisions in that code for dangerous buildings throughout the city. We can also use that for work without a permit. And then we use a couple of provisions from the Unified Development Code as well. Uh highlighted use standards for business out of home, and then also design and development standards.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com