STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Auburn City Council held a special meeting on Monday, October 12, 2026, at 5:30 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers, with virtual participation options. The sole agenda item was Ordinance No. 7042, which authorizes an additional one hundredth of one percent (0.01%) sales and use tax to assist children and families, as enabled by state law and previously adopted by King County. Mayor Nancy Backus presided, and all seven councilmembers were present. The meeting was adjourned at 5:39 PM.
No members of the public provided oral or written comments.
Good evening. We will call the Auburn City Council special meeting for Monday, October 12, 2026 to order. And this meeting will be held both in person and virtually. Deputy Mayor Tracy Taylor. Here. Councilmember Amher. Here. Councilmember Baldwin. Here. Council Mr. Lot? Here. Councilmember Rakes. Here. Councilmember Sturgis. Here. Councilmember Clinton Taylor. Here. Wonderful. Okay. We are going to allow for public comment tonight. This is the place on the agenda where the public is invited to speak to the city council on any issue. Sean, did we receive any written comments? No, Your Honor. Okay. And did we have do we have anyone online or anyone that has requested additional consideration? No, Your Honor. Okay. We will open it up to in person. Is there anyone in the room that would like to provide public comment? Is there anyone in the room that would like to provide public comment? All right. And we will move to ordinances. Ordinance number 7042 and ordinance amending sections 3.60.010 and 3.60.020 of the Auburn City Code to authorize an additional 100th of 1% sales and use tax for assisting children and their families in accordance with section 202, Chapter 221 Laws of 2026 codified as RCW 82.14.542 providing for a severability and establishing an effective date. A second.01% sales tax dedicated to the services that assist children's and their family. And in Director Thomas's calculation, that would mean roughly 75 to 85,000 that we would not be receiving for that first quarter of collection. And so I did not feel that we could in good conscience allow that to happen when the needs are so great in our community. I'm not saying that the county doesn't do good work with the funds, but I think if this tax is going to be enacted, then we should be able to have the benefit of that money being collected and returned to our city. Councilmember Baldwin. Thank you, Mayor. Do you have any background on when King County Council began evaluating this proposal? Or evaluating the measure that they have now passed? I do not. I don't believe it was on anyone's radar except within the last week or so when they passed it at their council meeting. It may have been in their packet in advance, but it was not common knowledge. Anyone else? Councilmember Baldwin?