Bainbridge Island Planning Commission Regular Meeting - December 11, 2025
Bainbridge Island Planning Commission Regular Meeting - December 11, 2025
The meeting was called to order at 6:07 PM and adjourned at 9:56 PM. Chair Blossom presided, with Commissioners Blossom, Garcia, Schaab, Birtley, and Deines present. Commissioners Sullivan and Preudhomme were excused. Council Liaison Quitslund, Senior Planner Sutton, and Planning Manager Buchanan attended. Mayor Mathews joined via Zoom from 6:49 PM to 7:14 PM. The commission addressed multiple outstanding items for the Winslow Subarea Plan update, including Floor Area Ratio (FAR) standards, zoning boundaries, parking reductions, and affordable housing incentives.
Consent Calendar
- Agenda approved unanimously (5-0).
- Minutes of October 23, 2025 approved (5-0).
- Minutes of December 4, 2025 special meeting approved (5-0).
Public Comments & Testimony
- Henry Zimmerman, architect representing Hagar Scribner Properties, expressed support for affordable housing but criticized the city’s process for fast-tracking code updates outside the comprehensive plan process. He highlighted the area’s potential for below-grade parking, open space, and pedestrian connectivity, and urged the commission to focus on comprehensive plan updates rather than development regulations.
Discussion Items
- FAR for Ferry Zone: A motion for a maximum FAR of 2.5 failed (1-4). A subsequent motion for a maximum FAR of 4.0 for both the Ferry and High School zones passed (4-1). This was later clarified to require both tuck-under parking and 25% of units affordable at 80% AMI (unanimous 5-0). A motion to set a tiered FAR system (2.5 unincentivized, 3.0 for one incentive, 4.0 for both) failed (2-3). A motion to request consultants bring back a tiered FAR recommendation for the Ferry zone to incentivize smaller unit sizes passed (5-0).
- High School Road Zone: A motion to ask consultants for a tiered FAR structure for the High School Road zone passed (5-0).
- Zoning for TBD Areas: A motion to keep the area north of High School Road in its existing zoning (R2.9 north, R8 south) passed (5-0). A motion to revert the area west of Central Core to existing zoning, adjusting the Central Core boundary, passed (5-0).
- Central Core Boundary and Standards: A motion to adopt the Central Core boundary as recommended on June 5 and October 30, except for parcel 4-095 and the Winslow Way Overlay area, passed (5-0). A motion to extend the Winslow Way Overlay east to Ferncliff passed (5-0). A motion to require a step-back after two stories in the overlay passed (5-0).
- FAR for Central Core: A motion for a maximum incentivized FAR of 3.0 (requiring tuck-under parking and 25% affordable at 80% AMI) passed (5-0).
- Connection Zone: A motion for a maximum FAR of 1.5 (requiring tuck-under parking and 20% affordable at 80% AMI) passed (4-0, Commissioner Deines absent).
- New Brooklyn/Sportsman Club Area: A motion to retain business industrial zoning for parcels north of New Brooklyn passed (4-0). A motion to retain current zoning for the rest of the area passed (4-0).
- Remaining Zones: A motion to retain existing zoning for all other zones in the Winslow Subarea not already addressed passed (4-0).
- Parking Reductions: A motion to reduce residential parking minimums by half in the Winslow Subarea, but no less than 0.5 spaces per unit, passed (5-0). A motion for staff to draft a condition requiring developers to demonstrate an on-site parking management plan passed (4-0, Deines absent).
- Affordable Housing Incentives: A motion allowing 100% affordable projects (80% AMI) in mixed-use zones to achieve base height plus two stories without tuck-under parking passed (4-0). A motion for staff to propose an affordable housing overlay for R zones passed (4-0). A motion that the overlay maintain similar scale and building form to existing neighborhoods passed (4-0).
- Civic and Cultural Connection Overlay: A motion to incorporate policies LU 7.8 and WMP 2-12.1 through 2-12.5 into the Winslow Subarea goals and policies failed (2-3). A revised motion with the language "city should consider" an overlay passed (3-2).
Key Outcomes
- Maximum FAR for Ferry and High School zones set at 4.0 when both tuck-under parking and 25% affordable housing (80% AMI) are provided.
- Consultants directed to develop tiered FAR structures for Ferry and High School zones to encourage smaller unit sizes.
- Central Core zone boundary finalized with step-back standards after two stories.
- Central Core maximum incentivized FAR set at 3.0; Connection zone at 1.5.
- Residential parking minimums reduced by half in Winslow Subarea (minimum 0.5 spaces/unit).
- Staff directed to draft an affordable housing overlay for R zones, ensuring similar scale to existing neighborhoods.
- Civic and cultural connection policies added with consideration for future overlay district.
- Existing zoning retained for all other areas within the Winslow Subarea.
Meeting Transcript
Okay, calling to order the planning commission regular meeting for Thursday, December 11th, 2025. We would like to begin by acknowledging that the land on which we gather is within the ancestral territory of the Sequamish, people of clear salt water, expert fishermen, canoe builders, and basket weavers. The Sequamish live in harmony with the lands and waterways along Washington's Central Salish Sea, as they have for thousands of years. Here the Sequamish live and protect the land and waters of their ancestors for future generations as promised by the Point Elliott Treaty of 1855. Has everyone had a chance to review the agenda. I move to approve the agenda as presented. Second. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes unanimously. Any conflicts of interest to disclose? All right, seeing none. Uh we'll move on to the approval of planning commission meeting minutes. We have a motion. Move approval of the planning commission minutes from October 23rd, 2025. Second. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes unanimously. Move approval of the planning commission special meeting from December 4th, 2025. Second. Motion and a second for December 4th, 2025. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes unanimously. Moving on to public comment. Member members of the public are encouraged to submit written public comment to the planning commission at any time by emailing PCD at BainbridgeWa.gov. Members of the public who wish to provide public comment in person at a planning commission meeting should sign up to speak on the sign-in sheet by the chamber doors. The planning commission chair will call the people signed up on the sign-in sheet, and speakers will have up to three minutes to speak from the podium. Please speak directly into the microphone, which is adjustable. A timer on the screen will indicate when three minutes or such other time set by the chair has elapsed. Orderly behavior and civility and remarks is expected with no clapping or booing and no yielding of one person's time to another person. Guidelines for public comment are provided. Remote public comment is allowed with advanced notice to the planning and community development department by noon on the date of the meeting at PCD at Bainbridge WA.gov, provided that all remote commenters shall be required to display their true name and to keep their camera turned on to show their true uncovered face while delivering their comments. Public comment is not accepted during the balance of the planning commission meeting unless a public hearing or public participation meeting is on the agenda. Henry Zimmerman is the first uh speaker. Will the only speaker signed up? Can I begin? Thanks. Good evening. My name is Henry Zimmerman. I'm an architect that has been working with my client Hagar Scribner properties on providing a legacy project on their parcels since 2017. I'm here to represent my client and as a concerned citizen and professional. Let me be clear. We are for affordable housing and have been trying to develop a project on my client site in Winslow with an affordable housing component since 2017. Our objections to the city's 625 project and the work to fast track code updates are made because they are being done hastily outside of the comprehensive plan update and Winslow sub-area plan update process without proper impact studies and while ignoring red flags such as parking, overwhelming public objection, and proper process per the code. The code is being designed backwards from the 625 project up, not from the codified public process of the comprehensive plan downwards.
openpublica.com