The Baldwin County Planning and Zoning Commission met on June 7, 2024, to consider rezoning requests, planned residential developments, site plans, and other planning matters. The meeting began with approval of minutes and a consent agenda, followed by public hearings and deliberations on multiple applications. Key decisions included approval of a rezoning for Sailors Landing but tabling its PRD, denial of a higher density rezoning in District 39, and approval of several subdivisions and site plans.
Note: Votes were taken by roll call on several items; exact tallies are recorded in the official minutes.
Good evening. I'm gonna call to order our June 6th meeting of the Balmain County Planning and Zoning Commission. If you will at this time with a stand, we'll have a prayer and a pledge of allegiance. We're thankful for this great county we live in. We're thankful, Father, for all that make it that way. Father, we're thankful for the politicians for our first responders for the for our county staff that works hard to make this meeting possible, Father, for uh just a great place to live, and we appreciate that. So, Father, we just ask that what we do tonight honors that by doing good planning, and Father, that you'll give us insight that we need to do that. May we uh show respect to each other and honor you and how we conduct ourselves. We pray all this in the name of Jesus. Amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. At this time, I'll call the roll, Brandon Bias, Robert Davis, Jason Padgett, Michael Mullock here, Greg Seibert, here, Bill Boyer, Jamie Stratager, Mike McKenzie, Glenn Seal, Diane Burnett, Michael Fletcher, Danny Bolton, George Waters, and our newest member, Reed Key. Reed, we're glad to have you as part of our planning commission. So all right, we have a quorum. So at this time, we'll uh deal with our minutes of our last meeting. So you've had a copy of the May 2nd work session and our May 2nd regular meeting uh sent to you. Hopefully, everybody's had a chance to look at that. If there are no corrections, I'll entertain a motion that both of those be approved. Move there to be approved, please. Mr. Booers made a motion be approved. Mr. Bolton has second the motion. Any questions on the motion? All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion carries. Okay, one abstention. All right. At this time, our planning director will uh come and give us a little presentation of some things we need to know before we get started tonight. All right. Uh thank you, Mr. Chairman and Commission. Um just want to quickly go over our public hearing guidelines. We do have several uh a lot, several uh public hearings today on both zoning and subdivision cases. Um but the our guidelines that we go by during this meeting, um the uh public comments should be uh made only during the public hearing portion. So if you have a comment on one of our uh items, uh please wait till that items up and the chairman opens the commit uh opens the public hearing. Uh when you're called to the microphone, uh state your name and address uh for the record. Uh all comments should be addressed uh directed towards the chairman and uh he can uh direct them to wherever they need to go to staff or or other or applicant. Um the comments should be focused on whatever the the current application is and not um not on other items or or speculative items. And uh comments from individuals should be limited to to three minutes. Um if you're here to speak on behalf of a group uh that that can be expanded to five minutes. You just need to let the chairman know that you're speaking on behalf of a larger group. Um on the rezoning cases, um just to remind everyone that there are uh 11 factors in the zoning ordinance that we uh are required to um review each zoning case by uh directed at land use and compatibility of the land use the proposed land use of the proposed zoning district. Those uh well, you're gonna see these in all of our um presentations today, but quickly it's uh you know is it compatible with development pattern? Has there been a change in the uh condition since the the property was originally zoned? Does it better conform to the master plan? Uh are there any conflicts with public improvements?