Baldwin County Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – June 7, 2024
Baldwin County Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting – June 7, 2024
The Baldwin County Planning and Zoning Commission met on June 7, 2024, to consider rezoning requests, planned residential developments, site plans, and other planning matters. The meeting began with approval of minutes and a consent agenda, followed by public hearings and deliberations on multiple applications. Key decisions included approval of a rezoning for Sailors Landing but tabling its PRD, denial of a higher density rezoning in District 39, and approval of several subdivisions and site plans.
Consent Calendar
- Extension and name changes: Cottonwood Estates (subdivision extension), Belfast Estates (name change), and Lillian Medical (site plan) were approved unanimously.
- Site plans: Floor Medic (5,000 sq ft facility) and Toy Box South Storage (14,000 sq ft storage) were approved after public comments on drainage were addressed.
- Subdivisions: Spartan Heights (3 lots), resubdivision of lots 1–4 CDS (8 lots), Heritage Estates (7 lots), and resubdivision of lot 13A Pinecrest Acre (2 lots) were approved. The Pinecrest Acre case drew opposition from neighbor Bill Cowan, who cited changes to neighborhood character and covenants; staff noted covenants are not county-enforceable. The motion carried with one dissenting vote (Commissioner Seibert).
Public Comments & Testimony
- Floor Medic (CSP 24-11): Raymond Klein, adjacent property owner, expressed concern about drainage and culvert maintenance on County Road 13. Staff committed to investigating and coordinating with the City of Fairhope.
- Baldwin 13 Subdivision (SC24-13): Mary Beth Agans and other residents raised worries about water runoff, traffic, and lack of turn lanes. Staff clarified the application was only a three-lot subdivision and that future development would require separate site plan review.
- Pinecrest Acre Resubdivision (SC24-23): Bill Cowan opposed the two-lot subdivision, stating it violated restrictive covenants and would increase density. Staff reiterated that covenants are civil matters.
- Sorrel RV Park (PUD 24-05): No public opposition; Chris, the applicant, answered commission questions about septic capacity and lot sales.
- Daphne VIP Storage (HCA 24-02 / CSP 24-09): No public opposition; Frank McGinley noted the existing building predates current setback rules.
- Sailors Landing (Z 24-13 / PRD 24-01): Four speakers opposed:
- Scott Feely, a neighboring farmer, cited pesticide drift and loss of farmland.
- Dr. Amy Paskowski, veterinarian with adjacent home and clinic, raised traffic safety concerns on Highway 98.
- Brian Bodway, lifelong resident, worried about volunteer fire department capacity and emergency access.
- Nick Knockline, bordering landowner, expressed fears about stormwater flooding during major events like Hurricane Sally.
- Swinson Property (Z 24-15): Heather Casablan opposed the rezoning to B3, fearing future commercial uses like a Dollar General.
- Creekwood LLC (Z 24-16): Multiple residents opposed:
- Hailey Gregorius, a member of Planning District 39’s advisory committee, argued the rezoning undermined the recently adopted zoning plan.
- Chris Frigo and Doug Ward cited traffic, school overcrowding, and the need for responsible growth.
- Sissy Hawkins added concerns about density and parking problems on smaller lots.
- Caroline Oaks Subdivision (SPP 24-08): Dr. Monica Chillelli, HOA president from across Highway 181, opposed due to dangerous traffic conditions entering and exiting the subdivision.
Discussion Items
- Sorrel RV Park (PUD 24-05): Staff presented a 49-site RV park in unzoned Bonsecour area. Waiver requests for sidewalks and curb/gutter were accepted. Fire hydrants not required; fire alarm system recommended at permitting stage. Road widening of Mulsby Road required. Motion to approve with staff conditions passed unanimously.
- Daphne VIP Storage (HCA 24-02 / CSP 24-09): The commission first approved a setback appeal for an existing storage building (53.6 ft from centerline instead of required 75 ft). Then approved the site plan for new storage units, which will meet all setback requirements. Both passed unanimously.
- Sailors Landing (Z 24-13 / PRD 24-01): Staff recommended approval of rezoning from RA to RSF2 and the PRD overlay for 226 lots, but noted traffic and amenity concerns. Commissioners debated lot sizes (some 50 ft wide), parking, lack of detailed landscape/amenity plans, and the need for a second emergency access. After public testimony, a motion to deny the rezoning failed (5 voted in favor, 6 against?). Then a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning passed. The PRD was tabled to the next meeting to allow the applicant to provide more details on amenities, parking, and buffering.
- Swinson Property (Z 24-15): Staff found the rezoning to B3 compatible with surrounding commercial uses along Highway 59. Over opposition, the commission recommended approval to the county commission.
- Creekwood LLC (Z 24-16): Despite staff’s finding that the request falls within a planned node permitting RSF4, the commission voted to recommend denial, citing incompatibility with the existing rural character, school crowding, and traffic concerns.
- Caroline Oaks Subdivision (SPP 24-08): Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat for a three-lot commercial subdivision. The applicant noted ALDOT-required turn lane improvements. The commission approved despite resident opposition.
- Candyland Storage (CSP 24-13): Approvals for existing storage buildings constructed in 2006 without proper site plan review. No opposition; motion passed unanimously.
Key Outcomes
- Rezonings recommended to county commission:
- Sailors Landing (RA to RSF2): Approved (6-5? unclear, but passed)
- Swinson (RSF2 to B3): Approved
- Creekwood (RSF3 to RSF4): Denied
- PRD tabled: Sailors Landing PRD conditionally tabled to July 11 meeting.
- Setback appeal and site plan approvals: All approved as moved.
- Next meeting: July 11, 2024.
Note: Votes were taken by roll call on several items; exact tallies are recorded in the official minutes.
Meeting Transcript
Good evening. I'm gonna call to order our June 6th meeting of the Balmain County Planning and Zoning Commission. If you will at this time with a stand, we'll have a prayer and a pledge of allegiance. We're thankful for this great county we live in. We're thankful, Father, for all that make it that way. Father, we're thankful for the politicians for our first responders for the for our county staff that works hard to make this meeting possible, Father, for uh just a great place to live, and we appreciate that. So, Father, we just ask that what we do tonight honors that by doing good planning, and Father, that you'll give us insight that we need to do that. May we uh show respect to each other and honor you and how we conduct ourselves. We pray all this in the name of Jesus. Amen. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. At this time, I'll call the roll, Brandon Bias, Robert Davis, Jason Padgett, Michael Mullock here, Greg Seibert, here, Bill Boyer, Jamie Stratager, Mike McKenzie, Glenn Seal, Diane Burnett, Michael Fletcher, Danny Bolton, George Waters, and our newest member, Reed Key. Reed, we're glad to have you as part of our planning commission. So all right, we have a quorum. So at this time, we'll uh deal with our minutes of our last meeting. So you've had a copy of the May 2nd work session and our May 2nd regular meeting uh sent to you. Hopefully, everybody's had a chance to look at that. If there are no corrections, I'll entertain a motion that both of those be approved. Move there to be approved, please. Mr. Booers made a motion be approved. Mr. Bolton has second the motion. Any questions on the motion? All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion carries. Okay, one abstention. All right. At this time, our planning director will uh come and give us a little presentation of some things we need to know before we get started tonight. All right. Uh thank you, Mr. Chairman and Commission. Um just want to quickly go over our public hearing guidelines. We do have several uh a lot, several uh public hearings today on both zoning and subdivision cases. Um but the our guidelines that we go by during this meeting, um the uh public comments should be uh made only during the public hearing portion. So if you have a comment on one of our uh items, uh please wait till that items up and the chairman opens the commit uh opens the public hearing. Uh when you're called to the microphone, uh state your name and address uh for the record. Uh all comments should be addressed uh directed towards the chairman and uh he can uh direct them to wherever they need to go to staff or or other or applicant. Um the comments should be focused on whatever the the current application is and not um not on other items or or speculative items. And uh comments from individuals should be limited to to three minutes. Um if you're here to speak on behalf of a group uh that that can be expanded to five minutes. You just need to let the chairman know that you're speaking on behalf of a larger group. Um on the rezoning cases, um just to remind everyone that there are uh 11 factors in the zoning ordinance that we uh are required to um review each zoning case by uh directed at land use and compatibility of the land use the proposed land use of the proposed zoning district. Those uh well, you're gonna see these in all of our um presentations today, but quickly it's uh you know is it compatible with development pattern? Has there been a change in the uh condition since the the property was originally zoned? Does it better conform to the master plan? Uh are there any conflicts with public improvements?
openpublica.com