OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Baltimore County, Maryland/County Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Baltimore County Council Legislative Day 17 - September 16, 2026

County Council — Wednesday, September 16, 2026
BodyBaltimore County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council
DateWednesday, September 16, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:46:51

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
1:21

Good afternoon, everyone.

1:23

Welcome to Baltimore County Council legislation legislative day number seventeen.

1:33

We have a jam packed agenda today.

1:36

So we will try to get through it as quick as we can.

1:40

We're gonna start with a um bills for final reading and vote.

1:46

Um Mr.

1:48

Secretary, did you need to call one and two or did well the uh those those two um seventy six, I'm sorry, seventy-two twenty-six and seventy-three twenty-six, Mr.

1:57

Chair.

1:57

Uh the one is the waterway improvement supplemental appropriation uh that the that Major Weidick from the police department presented at the last meeting, and seventy-three is the fire prevention code, just the update uh every three or four years that Chief Dixon presented at the last meeting.

2:14

Right.

2:15

Um there were no questions from the at the time, so that they were excused from today's okay.

2:20

I I just didn't know if we needed to read them into the record or we could just move on to our first real one.

2:27

Yes, the first reading.

2:30

Right.

2:30

So we'll we'll go to Bill eighty six twenty-six.

2:34

Uh this is from the police department, and I think uh Colonel Matthew Gorman is with us today.

2:41

Colonel Gorman, how are you, sir?

2:44

Good.

2:45

Um I know you're gonna present to us about some police body armor.

2:52

Come on on up.

2:53

Thank you, sir.

3:05

Mr.

3:05

Chairman, members of the council.

3:07

Thank you for having us today.

3:08

The uh the Baltimore County Police Department is requesting that the Baltimore County Council approve and accept and appropriate uh two thousand three hundred and eighty-six dollars for FY27 body armor for local and law enforcement grant award from the governor's office of crime prevention and policy.

3:26

Along with the two thousand three hundred and eighty-six dollars the county uh granted to the county.

3:31

Um the county would have to supply matching funds for a total of four thousand seven hundred and seventy-two dollars that will be used uh to purchase body armor for for officers.

3:41

It was a small grant.

3:42

Um the budget office found this opportunity after the FY27 budget had been approved, and so we have applied for and been uh preliminary accepted to take in the two thousand three hundred and eighty-six and just need the county's matching funds for doing so.

4:00

Okay.

4:00

Well, thank you, sir.

4:01

Any questions for Colonel Gorman?

4:04

Thank you, sir.

4:05

We appreciate you being here.

4:09

Okay.

4:10

Uh next up we have um Bill 752.

4:16

Uh, this is on rental housing licenses.

4:19

And I think Mr.

4:21

Gutwalt um from PAI is gonna we didn't you didn't testify on this last work session, right?

4:31

Or is you did well, come on up anyway, because we got you have two.

4:39

Um Mr.

4:40

Gutwell, could you could you briefly cover seventy-five twenty-five again?

4:44

Or twenty seventy-five twenty-six, I'm sorry.

4:46

Just then we'll go and then we'll go to uh we'll go to the next.

4:54

You you have we'll go to seventy-six twenty-six as well.

4:57

Okay.

5:00

Uh 7526 is the rental housing licenses, and what this is doing is essentially um requiring people to provide a license if they are advertising.

5:08

It's also requiring them to put a to uh apply for a license and have a license if they're going to advertise to rent uh a unit in the county.

5:17

That's the basics of what this does.

5:20

Okay.

5:21

And then um, does anybody have questions on that, Bill?

5:24

I don't, I don't think we had questions before either.

5:28

So this is merely you're still you're gonna you're still gonna register if it you have to rental you have to go through rental registration if if you're going to advertise the property.

5:42

Advertising a lot of times, you know, with code enforcement we'll people will start advertising the property, but they won't actually be rental renting it.

5:48

If there's a complaint about the property or we'll find out about it, we say we're gonna have this gives us the opportunity to say get a license for for advertising to rent the property.

5:56

Correct.

5:56

Okay.

5:57

That's all.

5:57

We're getting ahead of the game.

5:58

Yes.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Environmental Protection███████████████15%
Public Safety█████████9%
Transportation Safety█████████9%
Technology and Innovation████████8%
Water And Wastewater Management██████6%
Zoning Regulations██████6%
Data Center Regulation██████6%
Affordable Housing██████6%
Code Enforcement█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Baltimore County Council Legislative Day 17 - September 16, 2026

This session of the Baltimore County Council featured numerous legislative items, including bills for final reading, fiscal matters, zoning changes, and public hearings on contracts for waste disposal, police equipment, and transit-oriented development. The council heard extensive public testimony on several controversial items, including the Wheelabrator waste disposal contract, data center moratorium extension, and tenant eviction procedures. Multiple bills were introduced and discussed, with many expected to come up for final votes at a later meeting.

Consent Calendar

  • Bills 72-26 (Waterway Improvement Supplemental Appropriation) and 73-26 (Fire Prevention Code Update) were presented for final reading and were excused with no questions from the council.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Wheelabrator Contract (Municipal Solid Waste Disposal): Over 50 speakers registered. Jennifer Kunz (Clean Water Action) urged rejection, citing $54 million in health damages from four pollutants and 77% of industrial mercury emissions in the region. Marie Laporte (Sierra Club) called for zero-waste planning. Deborah Kleinman (Sierra Club) highlighted asthma impacts. Greg Saltell (Curtis Bay Community) raised concerns about toxic ash disposal rates. Residents from Baltimore City and County opposed the long-term incineration contract, advocating for recycling and composting instead.
  • Data Center Moratorium Extension (Bill 79-26): Dozens spoke in favor of extending the moratorium through end of 2027. Speakers including Cynthia Taylor (Mount Olive UMC), Joshua Long (Interfaith Power & Light), Sean MacIntosh, Venetia Bell, Mary Taylor (Back River Community Action Group), Tawodrus Desta L (union diversity advocate), and many others argued for a full ban, citing water/energy consumption, noise, environmental justice concerns, and lack of local jobs. Christopher Anderson (Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 486) supported responsible development with stronger regulations but opposed a full ban. Committee members urged careful regulation.
  • Tenant Notice on Eviction (Bill 74-26): Andrew Miller (Jews United for Justice), Catherine Baxter (Maryland Legal Aid), Nisha McCoy (evicted tenant), Jira Churchill, and Albert Turner (Public Justice Center) testified on due process concerns, noting the county's current ordinance may be unconstitutional without a reclamation period for tenant property. They urged amendments to provide clear notice and storage options.
  • Lutherville Station TOD Designation (Resolution 30-26): Many spoke in favor, including Klaus Philipsen (architect), Stephen Palmer (MD DHCD), David Frederick, Marsha McLaughlin, Brian O'Malley (Central MD Transportation Alliance), Pamela Shaw (Lutherville Community Association) expressed concerns about process and community engagement. David Karseski (developer's attorney) defended the process. Michael Saviniac (B'More for People-Oriented Places) supported designation but criticized the current proposal as automobile-oriented.
  • Traffic Calming in Rural Areas (Resolution 31-26): Letitia Thompson, Lucy Rupke, and Rena Ryan testified about dangerous speeding and traffic on Glen Arm, Parkville, and other rural roads, urging immediate safety improvements.

Discussion Items

  • Police Body Armor Grant (Bill 86-26): Colonel Matthew Gorman requested acceptance of $2,386 grant with $2,386 in matching county funds for FY27 body armor. No questions.
  • Rental Housing Licenses (Bill 75-26): Mr. Gutwalt explained the bill would require a license for any property advertised for rent. No council questions; one speaker supported.
  • Electrical Code Update (Bill 76-26): Technical amendment to align with state code. Discussed clerical error amendment.
  • Mission Critical Partners Contract Amendment: Chris Martin presented amendment to extend contract for 911 backup center support through 2030. No questions.
  • KC Lance Industries Contract: Lawrence Richardson presented contract for moving portable dental equipment for school sealant program. Auditor questions addressed regarding reduced number of moves.
  • Mobile Dredging & Video Pipe Contract: Lisa Eichholtz presented contract for sewer and storm drain cleaning. Auditor questions on compensation limit via metro operating budget.
  • Middle River Sewer Extension (Resolution 28-26): Health project to connect 10,600 block of Bird River Road. Cost sharing: county $151,458.54, property owners $68,055.78 over 40 years. Councilman Marks noted community meeting. No opposition.
  • Atlantic Lining Company Contract: Nicholas Rodericks presented contract for geosynthetic liner installation/repair at landfills. Auditor questions on historical procurement and funding. No questions.
  • Wheelabrator Contract: Lauren Buckler presented five-year contract with four one-year renewals, rate increase to $60/ton. Councilman Marks questioned 10-year lock-in. Councilman Patoka expressed concerns about long-term commitment and environmental impact. Discussion of air permit status and alternative disposal costs.
  • Growth Tier Map Change (Resolution 27-26): Director Lafferty presented change for 4122 Sweet Air Road from Tier 4 to Tier 3, allowing major subdivision on septic. Planning board concurred. One speaker supported.
  • Turner Station PILOT Amendment (Resolution 29-26): Terry Hickey presented revised agreement due to closing delay. Start date pushed to July 1, 2027. Councilman Crandall expressed support.
  • Commercial House Parties (Bill 84-26): Brad Croner and police officials explained bill to prohibit for-profit parties in residential areas, citing resource drain. Council members Jones, Young, Crandall added as co-sponsors. Speakers Linda Sumeski and Mary Harvey requested broader language for rural areas and higher fines.
  • Inspector General Technical Clarification (Bill 78-26): Councilman Ortell explained bill ensures OIG continuity when IG vacant. Speaker Mary Taylor supported with caveat on delegated authority.
  • Data Center Moratorium Extension (Bill 79-26): Councilman Marks moved to extend moratorium through 2027 to await state report. Extensive testimony.
  • MLR Zone Uses (Bill 80-26): Councilman Mangioni presented bill to add commercial/institutional uses in Hunt Valley office parks.
  • Residential Office Zone Beauty/Wellness (Bill 81-26): Councilman Jones presented bill after constituent Janice Brown's request. Councilman Patoka noted code updates needed for new business models.
  • Surplus Commodities for Fire Companies (Bill 82-26): Councilman Marks presented bill to allow donation/lease of surplus equipment. Councilman Jones and others co-sponsored.
  • FOP Property Tax Credit (Bill 83-26): Enabling legislation for MD Transportation Authority Police. No questions.
  • Advisory Committee on Animal Services (Bill 85-26): Brad Croner and Dr. Varella presented bill to revamp committee. Speaker Ann George opposed, citing lack of community input and past vacancies.
  • Tenant Notice Warrant of Restitution (Bill 74-26): Mr. Croner presented bill aligning with state law requiring 14-day notice. Amendments proposed to remove abandonment ordinance and study further. Debate on constitutionality and cost.
  • Lutherville Station TOD (Resolution 30-26): Councilman Mangioni and Director Lafferty presented. Discussion of community benefits and need for PUD process. Support from many groups; concerns about timing and community engagement.
  • Traffic Calming in Rural Areas (Resolution 31-26): Councilman Marks requested review of policies. Councilman Patoka noted need for more speed cameras. Testimony from affected residents.

Key Outcomes

  • No final votes were taken on legislative day 17; all bills and resolutions are scheduled for final reading and vote at the next legislative session (anticipated Monday, September 20).
  • Extensive public input on the Wheelabrator contract may lead to amendments or deferral.
  • Council members expressed interest in strengthening the data center moratorium bill with stronger community protections.
  • Amendments to the eviction notice bill were proposed; further discussion expected.
  • The TOD designation for Lutherville Station is expected to proceed with ongoing community negotiations.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Baltimore County Council legislation legislative day number seventeen. We have a jam packed agenda today. So we will try to get through it as quick as we can. We're gonna start with a um bills for final reading and vote. Um Mr. Secretary, did you need to call one and two or did well the uh those those two um seventy six, I'm sorry, seventy-two twenty-six and seventy-three twenty-six, Mr. Chair. Uh the one is the waterway improvement supplemental appropriation uh that the that Major Weidick from the police department presented at the last meeting, and seventy-three is the fire prevention code, just the update uh every three or four years that Chief Dixon presented at the last meeting. Right. Um there were no questions from the at the time, so that they were excused from today's okay. I I just didn't know if we needed to read them into the record or we could just move on to our first real one. Yes, the first reading. Right. So we'll we'll go to Bill eighty six twenty-six. Uh this is from the police department, and I think uh Colonel Matthew Gorman is with us today. Colonel Gorman, how are you, sir? Good. Um I know you're gonna present to us about some police body armor. Come on on up. Thank you, sir. Mr. Chairman, members of the council. Thank you for having us today. The uh the Baltimore County Police Department is requesting that the Baltimore County Council approve and accept and appropriate uh two thousand three hundred and eighty-six dollars for FY27 body armor for local and law enforcement grant award from the governor's office of crime prevention and policy. Along with the two thousand three hundred and eighty-six dollars the county uh granted to the county. Um the county would have to supply matching funds for a total of four thousand seven hundred and seventy-two dollars that will be used uh to purchase body armor for for officers. It was a small grant. Um the budget office found this opportunity after the FY27 budget had been approved, and so we have applied for and been uh preliminary accepted to take in the two thousand three hundred and eighty-six and just need the county's matching funds for doing so. Okay. Well, thank you, sir. Any questions for Colonel Gorman? Thank you, sir. We appreciate you being here. Okay. Uh next up we have um Bill 752. Uh, this is on rental housing licenses. And I think Mr. Gutwalt um from PAI is gonna we didn't you didn't testify on this last work session, right? Or is you did well, come on up anyway, because we got you have two. Um Mr. Gutwell, could you could you briefly cover seventy-five twenty-five again? Or twenty seventy-five twenty-six, I'm sorry. Just then we'll go and then we'll go to uh we'll go to the next. You you have we'll go to seventy-six twenty-six as well. Okay. Uh 7526 is the rental housing licenses, and what this is doing is essentially um requiring people to provide a license if they are advertising. It's also requiring them to put a to uh apply for a license and have a license if they're going to advertise to rent uh a unit in the county. That's the basics of what this does. Okay.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com