OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Bellevue Planning Commission Meeting – July 23, 2026

City CouncilThursday, July 23, 2026
BodyBellevue, Washington
SessionCity Council
DateThursday, July 23, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:57:51

Transcript — Verbatim
0:04

Are we?

0:06

Great.

0:07

Good evening and welcome to the July 22nd meeting of the City of Bellevue Planning Commission.

0:11

This evening's meeting is held via hybrid format with both in-person and virtual options via Zoom.

0:16

Tonight's meeting will provide an opportunity for public comments during the oral communications portion of the agenda.

0:22

All written comments that have been submitted prior to 11 a.m.

0:25

today, Wednesday, May 13th, will be summarized into the record.

0:29

We have three public hearings on the agenda tonight.

0:31

The first public hearing is for the Evans Plaza Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA.

0:35

The second one is the public hearing for the Transportation Conformance Comprehensive Plan Amendment.

0:40

And the third one is the public hearing for the parking reform land use code amendment.

0:43

Now let's move forward to roll call.

0:45

First, Commissioner Conloo and Commissioner View Vases have both informed us that they will not be attending this meeting.

0:50

Commissioner Ferris will be remote.

0:53

And uh Commissioner Keppel.

0:55

Here.

0:56

Commissioner Nilcheon.

0:59

Here.

1:00

Commissioner Kennedy.

1:02

Present.

1:02

And Council Liaison, Councilmember Bargava.

1:05

Here.

1:05

And I am Chair Liu.

1:08

All right.

1:08

Can we get a motion to approve tonight's agenda?

1:11

So moved.

1:12

Is there a second?

1:13

All approve of the agenda.

1:14

Say aye.

1:15

Aye.

1:15

Aye.

1:16

All right, Councilmember Bargava, do you have any reports for us?

1:20

Yeah, I just want to provide a quick update on the council meeting this week.

1:25

There was some uh there were three uh important elements I just want to call out.

1:30

The first is we had a quick park naming recommendation uh from the PAX Commission with a lot of um community input.

1:38

Staff recommended a name for a park on Main Street and 112th Avenue, Southeast.

1:44

Uh after uh uh comprehensive uh process they went through and a unanimous recommendation from the parks board, and the park name they chose was Isan Park, and the council uh was fully in agreement as well.

1:58

The name honors Bellevue's Japanese American heritage and supports the future Japanese American legacy project that is planned on the site.

2:05

So that's the first one.

2:07

The second, we had a study session, which was kind of interesting.

2:11

I want to call out a few things from there on the transportation capital needs and growth strategy.

2:16

Um staff provided an update on the transportation capital needs to support Bellevue's plan growth, including a new portfolio project management approach that they put together and potential uh for a possible transportation benefit district to be funded either through a councilmatic action or through a vote of the people.

2:37

Um the discussion uh was very much focused around multimodal infrastructure, um safety improvements, and aligning investments needed for the comprehensive plan uh growth.

2:50

But there was also a couple of key changes.

2:52

Uh one, the TBD is now not part of the baseline budget that was going to come through later this year.

2:57

And the second thing is um the TBD funding will they proposed right now a different split from a 60-40 split with a 40% to the grand connection now to a 10% to the grand connection versus what it was before.

3:12

So that was a couple of things on the TBD that we're both calling out.

3:16

And lastly, there was uh um a quick update on the MFT updates for advancing HOMA housing goals.

3:24

Um, it was just sort of a follow-up from the earlier session that council had on this um with the changes incorporated into a possible update to the code um with the four-year MFT catalyst supercharger and um a two-year look back.

3:40

They also change we also had a proposal for expanding the fee and loo option.

3:45

Um, to be able to get to participate in the MFDA program if folks want doing on-site performance for affordable housing instead of we're doing a fee and loo.

3:54

And of course, there was some clarifications around the permit issuance and filing date, et cetera.

3:59

So those were the key uh updates from the council this week.

4:03

So any questions for the council member.

4:07

Great.

4:07

Uh Kate, are there any reports from the boards and commissions?

4:10

No boards and commissions, but I just wanted to acknowledge that Commissioner Ferris is indeed remote.

4:15

Great.

4:15

Thank you.

4:17

All right.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use and Zoning█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Community Engagement██████████████████19%
Procedural██████████████15%
Affordable Housing█████5%
Transportation Safety████4%
Economic Development███3%
Public Transportation███3%
Environmental Protection1%
Public Engagement1%
Summary of Proceedings

Bellevue Planning Commission Meeting – July 23, 2026

The Bellevue Planning Commission met on July 23, 2026, in a hybrid format (in-person and via Zoom) to conduct three public hearings: the Evans Plaza Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA), the Transportation Conformance CPA, and the Parking Reform Land Use Code Amendment (LUCA). The meeting also included oral communications from the public, reports from the council liaison, and scheduling updates. The commission voted on recommendations for all three items, forwarding them to the city council.

Public Comments & Testimony

General Oral Communications (Public Comment)

  • Several residents of the Woodridge neighborhood spoke about conflicts between new middle-housing permits and existing private covenants. They requested better permit transparency, on-site notices, and mailed notifications for middle-housing projects. Speakers included Marcel Van Houten (Woodridge Community Association treasurer), Eric Brand (physician and board member), David Lee (commercial developer), Carol Schiller, and Julie Cobb. They emphasized that the city should not enforce covenants but should improve the process to avoid costly litigation.
  • Alex Zimmerman spoke about lack of affordable senior housing and criticized the city’s housing policies. He was warned to stay on topic and later removed after disruptive behavior.

Evans Plaza CPA Public Hearing

  • Tenants and neighborhood residents testified. Small business owners (Rebecca Chatfield of Best Friends Bellevue Pet Salon, Mohammed Roshan Khan of Shahana Steakhouse) described the thriving commercial center and expressed fear of displacement. They asked for protections, longer notice, and relocation assistance.
  • Bridal Trails residents (Barbara Hughes, Warren Halverson, Pamela Johnston, Loretta Lopez, Norman Hanson) opposed the applicant’s high-density proposal, citing traffic congestion, loss of retail, and inadequate transit access. They argued the process lacked robust public engagement and that the site is not transit-oriented.
  • Alex Zimmerman also spoke against the plan, calling it a “fake” plan and urging rejection.

Transportation Conformance CPA Public Hearing

  • Only Alex Zimmerman registered to speak. He was removed after being disruptive and not staying on topic. No other public comments were received.

Parking Reform LUCA Public Hearing

  • Nava Carlisle (Bellevue Chamber intern) spoke in favor of reducing parking requirements. She requested elimination of the citywide visitor parking requirement, removal of minimum parking in growth centers and transit areas, and a standalone administrative departure process for parking reductions.

Discussion Items

Evans Plaza Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA)

  • Staff presented a recommendation to change the site’s land use designation from General Commercial to Low Rise One Mixed Use (LR1) instead of the applicant’s requested Low Rise Two Mixed Use (LR2). Staff argued that LR1 is consistent with the comprehensive plan, given limited transit access and the Pineview neighborhood center’s character.
  • The applicant (Steve Malson, Evans Wakefield) argued for LR2, noting proximity to highways and light rail (though stations are a mile away) and the need for higher density to support mixed-use development.
  • Commissioners discussed the “significantly changed conditions” criterion. Commissioner Keppel and Kennedy expressed doubt that policy changes since the 2024 comprehensive plan update met the high threshold. Commissioner Ferris and Nilcheon felt the neighborhood center designation constituted a significant change. Commissioner Liu supported the staff recommendation.
  • The commission voted on a motion to recommend the staff’s LR1 designation. The motion carried (2 ayes, 2 opposed, 0 abstentions, with one commissioner possibly not voting).

Transportation Conformance CPA

  • Staff presented minor amendments to align the transportation element with updated functional plans (Mobility Implementation Plan and Transportation Facilities Plan). The changes remove references to superseded plans and update a 12-year timeframe to 20 years.
  • The Transportation Commission had previously reviewed and recommended the amendments.
  • Commissioners unanimously supported the staff recommendation.

Parking Reform Land Use Code Amendment (LUCA)

  • Staff presented a draft to comply with state laws (SB 5184, SB 6015, HB 1491) and consolidate parking regulations. Key changes: location-based and use-based parking exemptions, reduced minimum ratios, visitor parking requirement citywide, and new parking development standards.
  • Commissioners discussed:
    • Visitor parking: staff clarified the requirement is allowed under state law and applies to new residential projects only. Commissioner Kennedy noted the need for visitor spaces.
    • Shared parking: Commissioner Keppel suggested stronger incentives; staff recommended a wait-and-see approach.
    • Parking space width: staff proposed two alternatives for incentivizing wider spaces. Alternative Two (allowing a mix of 9-foot and standard spaces with a 10% reduction for all spaces being 9 feet, or a 12% reduction if all are 9 feet) was favored by commissioners as a compromise.
  • Commissioners expressed support for the wait-and-see approach on shared parking and Alternative Two for width incentives.

Key Outcomes

  • Evans Plaza CPA: The commission voted to recommend the Low Rise One Mixed Use designation (staff recommendation) to the city council. The motion carried with a divided vote.
  • Transportation Conformance CPA: The commission unanimously recommended approval of the minor amendments to the city council.
  • Parking Reform LUCA: The commission voted to recommend approval of the LUCA to the city council with the adoption of Alternative Two for parking space width incentives (allowing a mix of 9-foot and standard spaces with a 10–12% reduction). The motion carried unanimously.
  • Meeting adjourned at approximately 10:00 PM.

Meeting Transcript

Are we? Great. Good evening and welcome to the July 22nd meeting of the City of Bellevue Planning Commission. This evening's meeting is held via hybrid format with both in-person and virtual options via Zoom. Tonight's meeting will provide an opportunity for public comments during the oral communications portion of the agenda. All written comments that have been submitted prior to 11 a.m. today, Wednesday, May 13th, will be summarized into the record. We have three public hearings on the agenda tonight. The first public hearing is for the Evans Plaza Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA. The second one is the public hearing for the Transportation Conformance Comprehensive Plan Amendment. And the third one is the public hearing for the parking reform land use code amendment. Now let's move forward to roll call. First, Commissioner Conloo and Commissioner View Vases have both informed us that they will not be attending this meeting. Commissioner Ferris will be remote. And uh Commissioner Keppel. Here. Commissioner Nilcheon. Here. Commissioner Kennedy. Present. And Council Liaison, Councilmember Bargava. Here. And I am Chair Liu. All right. Can we get a motion to approve tonight's agenda? So moved. Is there a second? All approve of the agenda. Say aye. Aye. Aye. All right, Councilmember Bargava, do you have any reports for us? Yeah, I just want to provide a quick update on the council meeting this week. There was some uh there were three uh important elements I just want to call out. The first is we had a quick park naming recommendation uh from the PAX Commission with a lot of um community input. Staff recommended a name for a park on Main Street and 112th Avenue, Southeast. Uh after uh uh comprehensive uh process they went through and a unanimous recommendation from the parks board, and the park name they chose was Isan Park, and the council uh was fully in agreement as well. The name honors Bellevue's Japanese American heritage and supports the future Japanese American legacy project that is planned on the site. So that's the first one. The second, we had a study session, which was kind of interesting. I want to call out a few things from there on the transportation capital needs and growth strategy. Um staff provided an update on the transportation capital needs to support Bellevue's plan growth, including a new portfolio project management approach that they put together and potential uh for a possible transportation benefit district to be funded either through a councilmatic action or through a vote of the people. Um the discussion uh was very much focused around multimodal infrastructure, um safety improvements, and aligning investments needed for the comprehensive plan uh growth. But there was also a couple of key changes. Uh one, the TBD is now not part of the baseline budget that was going to come through later this year. And the second thing is um the TBD funding will they proposed right now a different split from a 60-40 split with a 40% to the grand connection now to a 10% to the grand connection versus what it was before. So that was a couple of things on the TBD that we're both calling out. And lastly, there was uh um a quick update on the MFT updates for advancing HOMA housing goals. Um, it was just sort of a follow-up from the earlier session that council had on this um with the changes incorporated into a possible update to the code um with the four-year MFT catalyst supercharger and um a two-year look back. They also change we also had a proposal for expanding the fee and loo option.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com