Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Bentonville Planning Commission met on November 4, 2025, beginning with a Tech Review session at 4:00 PM followed by a Public Hearing at 5:00 PM. The agenda included several lot splits, large-scale developments, waivers, and an update on the Plan Bentonville code revision. A significant portion of the meeting focused on a new sewer capacity policy and its impact on pending lot splits.
All right, it's four o'clock. We're gonna go ahead and get started with our November 4th tech review meeting. Uh has everyone had a chance to look at the October 21st meeting minutes. Yes. All right. Well, we'll get started with our consent agenda. Okay. Item one, Autumn Hills subdivision. It's a typo on the agenda. It's actually lots 61 and 62 property line adjustment. The developer uh split it, took it to the HOA board, and they said nope. And so they're coming back to unsplit it. All right, next item. Item two, Medlin Meadow subdivision phase two lot one. This is an easement plat for some utility easements. This is uh north of Southeast Walton at Medlin Lane. It's the multifamily project 120 units. Next item. Item three, ever sole addition lot 26, another easement plat. This is for Macaulay Place out there by the community center. Uh some access drainage and utility easements at 751 Southwest 41st Street, R3 zone property. All right. All right, next item. Item four C Street Town Homes, a large scale development for 61 townhomes sitting on 2.5 acres. It's parked at a 2.2. This is at the southeast corner of 8th and C near Thayden School. And uh I think I put it enough in the uh agenda that we understand it. It's the material standard that meets the neighborhood materials. It's not the standard one that we have for large scales because it's residential in a DC zone. So could I ask Tom what process? Because I'm looking at the staff report and it's bolded consistent with surrounding development. Um so what process does staff go through and reviewing to determine whether it's consistent with the surrounding development? Because I think I can make strong arguments that it's not consistent as well. So I'm just trying to figure out how you all process that when it comes in, because it's really a decision by the planning commission on whether we think it looks good and whether we think it's consistent with. Agreed. So uh the applicant put together sheet A200 where they took a snapshot of different projects in the neighborhood. So is the top of that sheet their project? Right.