Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Bentonville Planning Commission held a technical review session at 4:30 PM and a regular meeting at 5:00 PM on March 3, 2026. The commission addressed a consent agenda, a waiver request, a planned residential development, and four public hearing items. The meeting also included updates on the ARDOT N/S corridor and public comments on zoning overlays.
So it's 4 30. So uh good afternoon, everyone. I'm going to go ahead and call to order the tech review meeting of the Venville Planning Commission for March the 3rd. And uh we'll begin with the review of the minutes. Anyone have any modifications or changes uh to the minutes? Okay, see none. We'll move on to the consent agenda. Any items under the consent agenda that a commission would like to have removed from the consent agenda or any item that you'd like to have further discussion about at that review. Just for the record, uh number one is lot 13, not but not blood. Like 10. Thanks, sir. Okay, hearing none. We will retain those items on the consent agenda. Move to new business, the echo echelon subdivision waiver request. So Tom, you want to walk us through that one of uh subject matter experts. I think we need one. Okay. Um the essentially the purpose of this item is we discovered uh an issue with uh Peloton tying into West Third, um, didn't meet the street specs. Um we um notified the engineer record um of that discrepancy and requested them to correct the issue. Um, and then that's why it is in front of you because we're requesting all the way to the street specs. You so we we have the we kind of have the report, the request from them and and from engineering, but can you just kind of walk us through what the real issue is? And um, I know that I read in the report that that during the inspection was identified to them before they poured concrete, but they poured concrete anyway. Yes. So can you just kind of walk me through that? Yes, so our construction inspectors, you know, they perform inspections um right routinely, and as part of that, one of those inspections, um, the grade uh vertical grade was pointed out as being an issue with um how Peloton was tying in to Northwest Third. Um, and so at that point I went out and looked at it and determined that yes, the vertical grade didn't meet the street specs. Um, and the particular point is that the vertical grade of uh Peloton should meet the vertical grade or the grade of Northwest Third. And the way it is constructed today, there's a five-foot gap between um where they've constructed the shared use path and and where it ties into third, and there's about a 10% to 12 and a half percent uh grade difference between those two. So what it's gonna create is an issue where you know if you're turning into the subdivision, um, there's gonna be a downward grade on third to meet a 10% to 12% grade up to go over the shared use path and go into the subdivision on Peloton. And if you can also see the the fire code also states that grade of streets shall not be any greater than 10%. And in this case, it does violate that and and our street specs also line up to that. Um I don't know if there's any other information you want other than that, it's just gonna create an issue where um, as I stated in my comments that fire apparatus um has a potential to drag on that, and then also vehicles that are low to the ground, trailers, things like that with that change in vertical grade between third and and uh Peloton will create an issue where they would drag on that concrete and it would damage the concrete, could damage vehicles and also slow down the reactive time for urgency.