OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Bentonville, Arkansas/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Bentonville Planning Commission Meeting Summary - August 4, 2026

Planning Commission — Tuesday, August 4, 2026
BodyBentonville, Arkansas
SessionPlanning Commission
DateTuesday, August 4, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:00:30

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:50

That's that's relative.

0:51

All

Speaker 2

0:52

right, everybody ready?

Speaker 1

0:53

Okay.

0:55

So

Speaker 2

0:55

I'm gonna go ahead and call to order the um August the 4th.

Unassigned speaker

1:01

Do

Speaker 2

1:01

I have that right?

1:03

August the fourth meeting of the Bentville Planning Commission for tech review.

1:08

And uh we will begin with the minutes.

1:12

Does anyone have any changes, modifications, or comments with regards to the minutes from the July 24th meeting?

1:22

All right.

1:23

Seeing none, any items on the consent agenda, the commission would like to have removed to the regular agenda.

1:32

Any technical questions with regards to those three items?

1:39

All right.

1:40

Let's move on to a new business.

1:42

The first item up, Mr.

1:43

Ton.

Speaker 3

1:45

New business.

1:46

So this is uh an upcoming public hearing that the city council will be considering the vacation of an access easement.

1:55

There's a water line and uh the way the easement got laid down in uh Hanover was uh utility and access.

2:04

And uh we never really look at these, but now that we're putting them on the agenda, we looked at it and it was like, well, we actually need the access for Arthur Hill subdivision, the preliminary plat 24-0010 down below.

2:15

So we are uh recommending to approve the vacation as modified, excepting out a portion for heart rehear.

Unassigned speaker

2:24

Okay.

Speaker 3

2:33

Uh we spoke with the applicant, Michael, and he's thumbs up with the um okay.

2:39

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

2:43

So

Speaker 2

2:44

do we move that cons to consent with um as modified as as modified?

2:49

That's modified.

2:50

Yeah.

2:51

Okay.

2:52

Any objections to moving that to consent?

Unassigned speaker

2:55

All right.

Speaker 2

2:56

Seeing them.

2:57

Move on to item number two.

Speaker 3

3:00

Item number two, JB Townhomes phase two.

3:03

This is uh 841 Northwest 14th.

Unassigned speaker

3:07

Uh

Speaker 3

3:07

phase one came through a couple of years ago.

3:10

This one came in under the old code, five townhomes, uh, kind of a carriage house, uh, parking situation for four of the units and uh the easterly units got a garage.

3:21

Materials are brick for the first story, uh hardy for the second story.

3:25

Special use primary.

Speaker 2

3:28

Hey, help me, someone help me figure out the new plan where I can find materials.

3:35

Under vertical

Speaker 1

3:36

construction.

Speaker 2

3:37

Under vertical construction.

3:38

I I look through this thing.

3:40

I I must have spent 30 minutes looking for those.

Speaker 3

3:45

Yeah.

Speaker 1

3:45

That sounds

Unassigned speaker

3:46

right.

Speaker 2

3:48

50 dash four.

Speaker 1

3:50

I have a yeah, 50 dash 504, yes.

Speaker 2

3:59

I want to make I won't take time, but I look I look through the table of contents and uh I looked all over the place and I cannot find the others at all.

Unassigned speaker

4:08

So

Speaker 2

4:08

the hardy board falls.

4:09

Is that is that an allowable material or is that a special use material?

4:13

I'm sorry, I was gonna find out before I got here, I just couldn't find it.

Speaker 3

4:16

The special use primary.

Speaker 2

4:29

Yeah, I was just I was just trying to find

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████72%
Procedural████████████████26%
Water And Wastewater Management█2%
Summary of Proceedings

Bentonville Planning Commission Meeting Summary - August 4, 2026

The Bentonville Planning Commission met on August 4, 2026, in a Tech Review session at 4:30 PM followed by a formal Public Hearing at 5:00 PM. The agenda included a consent calendar, several rezoning requests requiring public hearings, and a planned unit development (PUD) amendment. Key topics included property line adjustments, right-of-way and easement vacations, large-scale development approval, and multiple zoning changes from R-1 to various Transect classifications.

Consent Calendar

  • Meeting Minutes: The July 21, 2026 meeting minutes were approved (note: the agenda lists July 21st, but the Tech Review session referenced the “July 24th meeting”).
  • PLA26-0005: Property line adjustment for Lot 1 of North Main Mixed Use (212 N. Main St.).
  • VAC26-0034: Approval of a right-of-way vacation between 6th and 8th on F Street.
  • VAC26-0039: Utility easement vacation (Lot 1 of Baker’s Park Addition, west of Mobilly near parks maintenance building).
  • VAC26-0036: Access easement vacation for Hanover Subdivision (between Lot 50A and 5A). Approved as modified, excepting a portion needed for Harper Hill subdivision access.
  • LSD25-0031: Large scale development approval for JB Townhomes Phase 2 (841 NW 14th St.), consisting of five townhomes with brick and HardiePlank siding.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • RZ26-0036 (Massary Rezoning – 201 SW E St.): Judy Markless (503 West Central Avenue) spoke in opposition to the rezoning from R-1 to T4.1. She expressed concern that the change would allow denser uses like apartments or duplexes, contributing to the loss of permanent residential character in downtown neighborhoods and increasing short-term rentals and businesses.
  • RZ26-0038 (Pinnacle Buttes Properties – 204 Lake St.): Marnie Fusco, the property owner, stated her goal was to align her lot with neighboring properties (including a T5.1 adjacent) to allow expansion of her existing single-family home.
  • PUD25-0002 (Laurel Canyon PUD Amendment): Keira Gilmore (MODIS Studio, architect) requested the removal of a previously required shared-use parking agreement, noting the site now qualifies for a parking reduction (28% discount) under the new code due to its proximity (one-eighth mile) to the greenway.

Discussion Items

  • RZ26-0033 (J & M Capital Ventures, LLC – 4001-4104 SW Pawhuska St.): A request to rezone 10 lots from R-1 to T3.2 within the Suburban Neighborhood Place Type (Enhanced Review). The applicant sought the change to accommodate front-loaded larger home plans on lots where rear-loading presented constraints. Commissioners debated the implications of T3.2 (which allows larger footprints, ADUs, and duplexes) versus T3.1, with some expressing concern about setting a precedent and the self-imposed nature of the lot constraints. Staff recommended approval, citing it as the proper path to compliance over a variance.
  • RZ26-0035 (JP Missouri LLC – 2109 E. Central Ave.): A request for rezone from T5.1 to T5.2 (Enhanced Review). Staff recommended denial based on the Shoemaker Basin sewer system potentially exceeding design flows. The applicant (Jason Engels, Expedient Civil Engineering) argued that sewer upgrades would be addressed during the large-scale development plan stage.
  • RZ26-0036 (Massary Rezoning – 201 SW E St.): A rezoning from R-1 to T4.1 (Standard Review). The applicant (Dr. Massary) sought the change to reduce the rear setback to accommodate a detached garage with a workshop. The applicant stated they would be fine with T3.1. Commissioners debated whether a historical commitment to maintaining low-density zoning on this street was binding or overridden by the new Future Land Use Map, which allows T4.1.
  • RZ26-0037 (Atkins Rezoning – 403 NW 7th St.): Rezoning from R-1 to T3.1 within the Traditional Neighborhood Place Type (Standard Review). Passed unanimously with little discussion.
  • RZ26-0038 (Pinnacle Buttes Properties – 204 Lake St.): Rezoning from R-1 to T3.2 within the Walkable Neighborhood Place Type (Standard Review). Passed unanimously.
  • PUD25-0002 (Laurel Canyon PUD Amendment): Reconsideration of a previously approved PUD amendment. The applicant requested removal of the shared parking agreement requirement, as the site satisfies the 28% parking reduction for being within an eighth of a mile of the greenway under the new code.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Agenda: Adopted unanimously via roll call vote.
  • RZ26-0033 (J & M Capital Ventures Rezoning): Denied. While the chair stated “the item approved,” the roll call votes recorded were all negative (Davis: No, Backway: No, Wright: No). The motion to approve the rezoning did not carry, and the zoning remains R-1.
  • RZ26-0035 (JP Missouri Rezoning): Denied. Unanimous vote (6-0) against approval.
  • RZ26-0036 (Massary Rezoning): Denied. Vote resulted in a 3-3 tie, failing due to lack of a majority. City staff was directed to reach out to the applicant to discuss alternative zoning (T3.1).
  • RZ26-0037 (Atkins Rezoning): Approved. Unanimous vote (6-0).
  • RZ26-0038 (Pinnacle Buttes Rezoning): Approved. Unanimous vote (6-0).
  • PUD25-0002 (Laurel Canyon PUD Amendment): Approved. Unanimous vote (6-0) to remove the shared parking agreement requirement.

Meeting Transcript

That's that's relative. All right, everybody ready? Okay. So I'm gonna go ahead and call to order the um August the 4th. Do I have that right? August the fourth meeting of the Bentville Planning Commission for tech review. And uh we will begin with the minutes. Does anyone have any changes, modifications, or comments with regards to the minutes from the July 24th meeting? All right. Seeing none, any items on the consent agenda, the commission would like to have removed to the regular agenda. Any technical questions with regards to those three items? All right. Let's move on to a new business. The first item up, Mr. Ton. New business. So this is uh an upcoming public hearing that the city council will be considering the vacation of an access easement. There's a water line and uh the way the easement got laid down in uh Hanover was uh utility and access. And uh we never really look at these, but now that we're putting them on the agenda, we looked at it and it was like, well, we actually need the access for Arthur Hill subdivision, the preliminary plat 24-0010 down below. So we are uh recommending to approve the vacation as modified, excepting out a portion for heart rehear. Okay. Uh we spoke with the applicant, Michael, and he's thumbs up with the um okay. Okay. So do we move that cons to consent with um as modified as as modified? That's modified. Yeah. Okay. Any objections to moving that to consent? All right. Seeing them. Move on to item number two. Item number two, JB Townhomes phase two. This is uh 841 Northwest 14th. Uh phase one came through a couple of years ago. This one came in under the old code, five townhomes, uh, kind of a carriage house, uh, parking situation for four of the units and uh the easterly units got a garage. Materials are brick for the first story, uh hardy for the second story. Special use primary. Hey, help me, someone help me figure out the new plan where I can find materials. Under vertical construction. Under vertical construction. I I look through this thing. I I must have spent 30 minutes looking for those. Yeah. That sounds

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com